You're very confused. I'll lay out the short-term conditions that Marx and Engels had for the transition to Communism. This is copied directly from The Communist Manifesto;

"The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralise all instruments of production in the hands of the State, i.e., of the proletariat organised as the ruling class; and to increase the total productive forces as rapidly as possible.

Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.

These measures will, of course, be different in different countries.

Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c."

The only one of these socialistic conditions that was not put into effect by the Bolsheviks was the first part of No. 8, "Equal liability of all to work", and even that only had a few exceptions. All of the rest were met by Soviet law. These conditions were also applied to the PRC, and many other states which called themselves communist before they either tore themselves apart or had to adopt much more practical policies. No, it wasn't the end result ie the abolition of money, state, and class. But they were communist. Not in order, but in ideology. The purpose of most communist governments has been to implement conditions that, if you believe Marx, will lead to communism as the final stage of economic systems. You're also incorrect about what fascism is, it doesn't simply mean a dictatorship and is in fact a well defined political ideology (usually, funnily enough, involving a sort of non-Marxist socialism), but I won't go into that now.

As for your rant about socialism and how it's real good and hunky-dory and the only reason people don't like it is because they're stupid and they don't know what it is; first of all it is directly related to communism as it features heavily in Marxist ideology. To a communist, socialism is the stage after capitalism and before communism and therefore that is usually what they implement and agitate for, see the excerpt from the Communist Manifesto. But regardless, it's dismissive and pretentious of you to claim that anyone who dislikes socialism and the expansion of state controls is simply ignorant of what it actually entails, especially as you yourself are showing great ignorance. All in all, please make sure you actually know what you're talking about before writing up something like this.