4522
4523

Hula Hoop (i.imgur.com)

drbatookhanxx が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]bury_the_boy 228ポイント229ポイント  (84子コメント)

Such a huge talent.

[–]blahblahblahblaha 28ポイント29ポイント  (60子コメント)

I'm puzzled at how few comments there are about how...like...she should keep doing this with enough frequency to...shrink her talent.

[–]basilhazel 74ポイント75ポイント  (49子コメント)

She obviously does it all the time. Just illustrates that diet has as much to do with weight as exercise.

[–]iLookLikeCapnAmerica 158ポイント159ポイント  (42子コメント)

Weight gain/loss is almost 100% calories in vs calories out.

The widest range in metabolic efficiency is about 5-10%.

You can lose weight eating nothing but butter and ice cream, just eat less than like 2k calories of it per day.

You can gain weight on carrots, just eat like 3k+ calories of it per day.

Exercise's only role in weight loss is to increase the caloric expenditure for the day in addition to portion control.

You should exercise to be aerobically and anaerobically healthy, not to lose weight.

[–]AFK42[🍰] 11ポイント12ポイント  (19子コメント)

How many carrots is 3000 calories?

[–]RareSense1012 12ポイント13ポイント  (10子コメント)

There are about 35 calories in one carrot. This means that it would take 86 carrots to reach 3,000 calories (35*86=3,010).

[–]hangerbaby 17ポイント18ポイント  (9子コメント)

That is surprisingly less than I would've thought

[–]ARandomCelebrity 25ポイント26ポイント  (2子コメント)

it's 16lb

[–]awry_lynx 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Yeah I could probably eat 86 carrots in a day. I mean, I'd hate it, but I could do it.

[–]ARandomCelebrity 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

it's 16lb

[–]LeagueOfLegendsAcc [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I don't think they are talking about baby carrots here.

[–]ReverendDizzle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You'd blow your colon to the mother fucking moon with a diet of 86 carrots a day. To the moon, Jerry!

[–]brolix [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

And this is why America is fat. No one has any clue what stuff costs calorically anymore.

[–]BLOODY_ANAL_VOMIT [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Right, and back when people worked on farms or in factories and didn't make it past 8th grade they did? Let's not pretend like there was a "good ole days" back when people counted calories and weighed their food.

The problem is we industrialized processed foods, which made calories incredibly cheap and easy to get, and at the same time we started to work outside less so we needed less calories.

[–]EnflameSalamandor 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

If you have a 3 oz portion of carrots, it's roughly 35 calories, so to hit 3000 calories in carrots is roughly 85 servings! Hopefully that answers your question :D

[–]davros_ 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Thank you for subscribing to Carrot Facts.

Did you know that cultivated carrots are usually made up of about 88% water, 7% sugar, 1% protein, 1% fibre, 1% ash, and 0.2% fat?

CARROT FACTS!

A nominal charge of 9.99 will appear on your monthly statement under the label CART*FCTS. Reply STOP to unsubscribe.

[–]samsaBEAR 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Enough to allow you to see into the void of space, let alone just the dark

[–]grodon909 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=224+carrots

[–]DREADLOCKSS [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Approximately 100 carrots according to the label of the carrots in my fridge (30 calories per serving of 78g green giant fresh carrots). But your macro's would be all messed up with 0g of fat, 700g of carbs, and 70g of protein in a 3000 calorie diet. You'd probably be dealing with a carb version of rabbit starvation due to a lack of fat in your diet. Fat is a necessary macronutrient for brain health and many other things. Meeting your calorie requirement is the most important thing to survive, next is your fat, carb, and protein requirements for long term health (macronutrients), next is your micronutrients (vitamins and minerals, usually found in meat and leafy green vegetables) and next is any supplements to your diet (creatine, fish oil, etc)

[–]chrypt 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

and to add to that, muscle consume more calories than fat so by building muscle you boost your calorie consumption, so build some muscle and you won't have a diet as restrictive as if you didn't exercise at all.

[–]RollBread 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have close relatives that do this and am now convinced that this is one of the biggest reasons people see next to no weight loss from dieting.

[–]Flyheading010 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

3000 calories comes to 120 regular or 750 baby carrots.

[–]k5josh -3ポイント-2ポイント  (7子コメント)

almost 100% calories in vs calories out.

"almost"? It's exactly calories in vs out.

[–]trpcicm 17ポイント18ポイント  (4子コメント)

The "almost" is the 5-10% disparity in BMR (Basal Metabolic Rate), which differs from person to person. If you took 100 people that all weight 100lbs and gave them the exact same diet and exercise regiment (like they stepped in sync, ate in sync, slept in sync) for a month, they would not all weight an identical weight at the end of the experiment due to differences in BMR. What the OP stated is correct, that it's almost all calories in vs calories out, but the slight difference comes up that there's a slight difference between how quickly each individual can use a single calorie.

[–]k5josh 12ポイント13ポイント  (3子コメント)

Metabolic rate is part of calories out.

[–]SuperBattleFranky37 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

yea - he's saying some people are more efficient at burning calories, and some people are less efficient. vice versa for maintaining calories in. it's just a quirk of having a large sample size.

[–]WorldBFree 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

not only do people differ, but the same person's rate can differ quite substantially from this time to that

[–]Meatmehalfway [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This is not taking into account BMR changes. For example, if I lift weights, my BMR after lifting will be higher than somebody who didn't lift. So the calories I burned during lifting are one thing but the new burn rate, as a result of lifting weights, is another. I think a lot of things change our BMR rates throughout the day so I think our current methods of calculating EE are missing variables.

[–]WorldBFree -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

not really

[–]hjklhlkj -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, if you got implants or an amputation you'd gain/lose weight...

But seriously, it's exactly calories in vs out otherwise.

[–]ZebraBrainLunchbox -2ポイント-1ポイント  (7子コメント)

You can lose weight eating nothing but butter and ice cream, just eat less than like 2k calories of it per day.

Well, yeah, but you would be incredibly unhealthy and have very little energy to do anything.

Weight differential is calories in calories out.

Proper nutrition is a little bit more than that.

[–]LateAugust 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

But they weren't talking about proper nutrition, they were talking about weight loss.

[–]iLookLikeCapnAmerica 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

You can lose weight eating nothing but butter and ice cream, just eat less than like 2k calories of it per day.

Well, yeah, but you would be incredibly unhealthy and have very little energy to do anything.

Unhealthy? Fuck yeah.

No energy? Nope.

You'd be getting tons of fat and carbs. You'd be fine for energy. You'd only be lacking in protein for muscle synthesis.

Weight differential is calories in calories out.

Proper nutrition is a little bit more than that.

Good thing I wasn't talking about micronutrient nutrition then, huh?

[–]ZebraBrainLunchbox [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Good thing I wasn't talking about micronutrient nutrition then, huh?

Good thing? I guess. What's the point then? Nobody should do what you said. It's pointless information. Like "You can lose weight by not eating food."

Yes, thanks. True but pointless.

[–]iLookLikeCapnAmerica [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Good thing I wasn't talking about micronutrient nutrition then, huh?

Good thing? I guess. What's the point then?

I'd say there were two main points...

Weight gain/loss is almost 100% calories in vs calories out.

And...

Exercise's only role in weight loss is to increase the caloric expenditure for the day in addition to portion control.

And if you've already forgotten, this was the comment I responded to...

She obviously does it all the time. Just illustrates that diet has as much to do with weight as exercise.

Do you need me to clarify how my response directly flows from the parent comment?

Nobody should do what you said.

I don't remember directing or even implying that anyone should do either example.

I'm honestly quite confused as to how you've come to this notion.

It's pointless information. Like "You can lose weight by not eating food."

Yes, thanks. True but pointless.

I think you're being a bit obtuse if you can't understand how those examples were perfectly illustrative of the principal I was explaining.

A principle which the vast majority of people out there sincerely do not understand; as simple as it is.

[–]ZebraBrainLunchbox [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Dude, just accept your comment was pointless and stupid.

Yes, 10-11 = -1. Thanks. We all get it.

It's not fucking informative or helpful at all.

Everyone knows calories in calories out. You're not clever anymore.

A principle which the vast majority of people out there sincerely do not understand

No. They do. You just want them not to so you seem special.

You're not special.

The only people who don't accept this as truth anymore are those who don't want to and you know you're not talking to them.

[–]rivermandan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

dude what in the fuck are you even going on about? get off your computer and have a nap

[–]warthundersfw 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Guck your fat shaming. I'd rather get invasive surgery because my body has been trained to not be full.

[–]ARandomCelebrity 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Well.. and while it certainly takes skill and technique, her movements aren't exactly a ton of exercise.

[–]iLookLikeCapnAmerica [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Given enough time they certainly are.

30 minutes of this kind of work, especially at her current weight, would be a decent workout.

[–]bctg106 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

While this is still exercise, it probably doesn't burn even close to the amount of calories that sprinting, long distance running or powerlifting does. Also while she seems very good at this with her current status of her body, how good do you think she'd be if she replaced all that excess adipose tissue with muscle, and trained her muscles for endurance.

[–]notheresnolight -3ポイント-2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Because she doesn't have any friends. Because of how unlikable she is. Unlikable. Liked by no one. A bitter, unlikable loner whose passing shall not be mourned.

[–]Snowblindyeti 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

The fuck....?

[–]notheresnolight 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

It says so right here in her personnel file. Very formal. Very official. It also says she was adopted. So that's funny, too.

[–]KuntaStillSingle 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

No one wanted to address the elephant in the room. Or more specifically the one in the hula hoop.

[–]peopledontlikemypost 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The fear of the ban is real

[–]CarnitasWhey -5ポイント-4ポイント  (0子コメント)

God you guys are rough lol

[–]Scrennscrandley 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Because it's not really necessary to comment on the appearance of people?

[–]fickle_fuck [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Even if they parade themselfs online? Every image that is taken and posted online is criticized.

[–]Banshee90 -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

I was thinking what did she look before she started doing this, but then again im a huge asshole.

[–]Win_in_Roam -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

You can find those comments, you just have to do is scroll aaaaallll the way down

[–]PerpetualDadBod -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Blah is very puzzled by people who aren't assholes

[–]smashedbigtoe 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I had to scroll down way to far to see the first joke of this size. I'm disappointed it wasn't bigger.

[–]Dick_Chainey 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm disappointed it wasn't bigger.

If you had a nickel...

[–]samvilla_1 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I had big expectations...

[–]STALKS_YOUR_MOTHER -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd be a lot less impressed if she was skinny. She has less room for error this way.

Edit: looks like tumblr girls passed through here.