use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
~18 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Zen Buddhism (Dhyāna, Chán, Seon, Thiền)
Yun Men's The Body Exposed, The Golden Wind (Oct 2015)
New to Zen? Remember, /r/zen is best consumed with a healthy dose of skepticism
Zazen instructions. (self.zen)
transgresionoverflow が 2日前 投稿
As the title says I want to practice zazen and when I searched on YouTube different techniques were given. What is the right technique for zazen?
[–]typondale 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日前 (5子コメント)
There isn't a right technique.Don't get caught up on this. I remember when I used to do zazen I was so worried I was doing it wrong.
If you're interested in this path, just sit down. You know about using a cushion and facing the wall right? Put your hands in your lap, tuck your chin to your chest, and follow you breath.
Some days are going to be better than others. Once in a while your mind will quiet completely and you'll feel euphoric. Most of the time it'll be a struggle.
But to be honest, a lot of people here don't believe that zazen is the right way to see your true nature. That's why you'll get some responses you weren't expecting. Make up your own mind tho.
[–]anotherjunkie 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日前 (3子コメント)
Here's something I've wondered: you mention sitting toward the wall, so I assume you meditate with your eyes open. Why is that? Is there a reason in the doctrine? Is it just generally agreed upon? I've read many times to sit with your eyes open, but my mind is much more tranquil with my eyes closed.
[–]sirwolfThe observer 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
You can meditate with your eyes open or closed, whichever works for you. Yoiu can look toward a wall, the ocean, or a forest.
Sit comfortably, in the most stable position you can achieve.
Follow your breath.
When you have a thought, hear something of feel something, note it.
The point is NOT to stop feeling hearing, thinking, the point is to bring the mind back to the focus object.
If you are wondering if you are doing it right, you are.
Here is a very new book that I recommend to anyone starting ut meditating The Mindful Geek.
It will give you a buttload of info without all the religious stuff. You can fill in the religion later if you like.
[–]typondale 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日前 (1子コメント)
Not sure. So you dont fall asleep i guess.
[–]themojomike 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
Basically this.
[–]dooj88 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
exactly. i've got my own dirt to have fun with. why should i worry about what's going on with yours and try to copy it?
[–]DaarioNuharisindependent 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
Order pizza. Wait. Zazen.
[–]songhill 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日前 (48子コメント)
Zazen or a form of it is taught in virtually all Buddhism tranditions. In Zen this is one of the specific instructions:
While still alive, be therefore assiduous in practising Dhyana. The practice consists in abandonments. ‘The abandonment of what?’ you may ask. Abandon your four elements (bhuta), abandon your five aggregates (skandha), abandon all the workings of your relative consciousness (karmavijnana), which you have been cherishing since eternity; retire within your inner being and see into the reason of it. As your self-reflection grows deeper and deeper, the moment will surely come upon you when the spiritual flower will suddenly burst into bloom, illuminating the entire universe. The experience is incommunicable, though you yourselves know perfectly well what it is. ~ Sixin Wuxin 死心悟新 (1044–1115)
[+]ewk スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント 2日前 (47子コメント)
Zen is not a branch of Buddhism.
If it was, you would have the courage to say what "Buddhists believe."
[–][deleted] 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日前 (12子コメント)
Hahaha
[–]ewk -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 2日前 (11子コメント)
Here's what Mahayana and Theravada believe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_points_unifying_Therav%C4%81da_and_Mah%C4%81y%C4%81na, Zen Masters reject that stuff.
Soto Buddhism, Secular, Mahayana and Theravada Buddhists all preach the eightfold path and the four noble truths. Zen Masters don't teach that stuff.
If you ask any religious person who really is sincerely Buddhist to define "Buddhism" and say what "Buddhists believe", it will be instantly recognizable that they won't tolerate Zen.
[–][deleted] 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日前 (10子コメント)
Thanks, you're free to believe or interpret whatever you want however you want. I just found that line pretty humorous.
[–]ewk -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 2日前 (9子コメント)
Disagree.
Facts are facts.
People don't get to make up stuff and pretend other people said it.
That's called fraud.
[–][deleted] 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日前* (8子コメント)
You disagree with me that I found it humorous? Or that you are free to believe and interpret what you want? You're right, facts are facts and these are facts.
Lol
edit: I became interested which may very well bite me in the ass but I wanted to look up the history of this lineage
The idea of a patriarchal lineage in Chan dates back to the epitaph for Fărú (法如 638–689), a disciple of the 5th patriarch, Daman Hongren (弘忍 601–674). In the Long Scroll of the Treatise on the Two Entrances and Four Practices and the Continued Biographies of Eminent Monks, Daoyu and Dazu Huike are the only explicitly identified disciples of Bodhidharma. The epitaph gives a line of descent identifying Bodhidharma as the first patriarch.[3][4] In the 6th century biographies of famous monks were collected. From this genre the typical Chan lineage was developed: These famous biographies were non-sectarian. The Ch'an biographical works, however, aimed to establish Ch'an as a legitimate school of Buddhism traceable to its Indian origins, and at the same time championed a particular form of Ch'an. Historical accuracy was of little concern to the compilers; old legends were repeated, new stories were invented and reiterated until they too became legends.[5]
The idea of a patriarchal lineage in Chan dates back to the epitaph for Fărú (法如 638–689), a disciple of the 5th patriarch, Daman Hongren (弘忍 601–674). In the Long Scroll of the Treatise on the Two Entrances and Four Practices and the Continued Biographies of Eminent Monks, Daoyu and Dazu Huike are the only explicitly identified disciples of Bodhidharma. The epitaph gives a line of descent identifying Bodhidharma as the first patriarch.[3][4]
In the 6th century biographies of famous monks were collected. From this genre the typical Chan lineage was developed:
These famous biographies were non-sectarian. The Ch'an biographical works, however, aimed to establish Ch'an as a legitimate school of Buddhism traceable to its Indian origins, and at the same time championed a particular form of Ch'an. Historical accuracy was of little concern to the compilers; old legends were repeated, new stories were invented and reiterated until they too became legends.[5]
Huh. So doesn't this lineage of Zen masters just trace right back to Buddha himself?
[–]ewk -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 2日前 (7子コメント)
As it turns out, not really. Here's some of the problems that arise from poor scholarship.
There is no one "Buddha". The name refers to several conflicting myths centered around some illiterate country hick who's father had an army.
The scholarship on Bodhidharma and the Patriarchs is about where the scholarship on Jesus was in the 1700's. Do the math on that one.
"Buddhism" is a colonial-era term for indigenous religions, much like "Indian" was a colonial-era term for Native Americans. In both cases the terms "Buddhism" and "Indian" inaccurately conflated disparate groups into a single broad label as if there were an underlying commonality based on the content of the groups... when the only real commonality was in the perception of the colonial powers that geography is a basis for label indigenous culture.
It might have been funny a hundred years ago to say "The Sioux are not Indians"... because people thought Native Americans were from India! Haha!
[–][deleted] 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日前 (4子コメント)
Again, thanks but you failed to elaborate on the piece I quoted but succeeded in commenting on my ignorance on the matter which is your strong suit it seems.
Replace Buddhism with dharma/dhamma for all I care, it doesn't change the idea behind a lineage.
[–]ewk -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 2日前 (3子コメント)
There isn't any one "dharma". You are still in the same boat with no paddle.
Somebody around here suggested something like replacing Buddhism with "Indianism", meaning "related to the many different cultures of ancient India".
Huangbo says that Bodhidharma dharma is the only valid dharma. He clearly didn't associate himself with Mahayana and Theravada religions.
[–]-Nagarjuna- 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
If there was anything further needed to discredit your viewpoint this is it.
I mean if it was based in a serious scholarly interest then it would be worth the time, but you've betrayed your true feelings here - you have some personal vendetta against Buddhists and their religion.
Also yes, he was illiterate, because there was no writing at the time... its not exactly an insult.
[–]ewk -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
ZeroDay account alt_trolls like you keep showing up here announcing that I've been discredited... lol.
I'm not claiming any credit to begin with.
I'm pointing out that the faux Buddhists in this forum can't define Buddhism, don't represent mainstream Buddhists in their views, and refuse to acknowledge that Zen Masters http://www.reddit.com/r/zen/wiki/lineagetexts don't teach the Buddha myths that churches preach.
This is the Zen forum. There is no vendetta in pointing out that faux Buddhists lying about Zen is a reflection on the failures of their faith and have nothing to do with Zen study.
Read a book. Not a magazine, not a sutra bible, read a @#$%#@#$ book.
[–]songhill 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日前 (31子コメント)
Zen is a branch or scion of Buddhism. Zen stems from the Seven Buddhas.
[–]ewk -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 2日前 (30子コメント)
If that were true, you could define "Buddhism" and say what "Buddhists believe."
You can't say. Your tongue has been cut off.
You can't even AMA about your religion without getting laughed out of this forum.
So your doctrines aren't all that interesting... since they are the doctrines of a coward.
[–]AbbieSage 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日前 (9子コメント)
Real Buddha-like behavior going on here.
[–]ewk -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 2日前 (8子コメント)
Yeah. When I ask the religious trolls (proslytrolls) in this forum what "Buddhism" is and what "Buddhists believe" they panic and start violating the precepts as fast as they can.
That the internets though. Religious intolerance and all that. You'd think the way they act that there wasn't an /r/Buddhism where they could go to talk about their faith.
[–]KeyserSozen 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (7子コメント)
In your world, you're always right. That must be comforting.
[–]ewk -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (6子コメント)
Dude, don't be silly. What is there to be "right" about?
Just because I pwn some illiterate religious guys and some New Agers on teh internets doesn't mean "always right".
You act like balancing a checkbook is some kind of miraculous thing that suggest divinity in the person who says they do it.
Get yourself together. Read a book.
[–]KeyserSozen 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
You must be confused -- I didn't say that you are right, though you certainly seem to believe that you are.
[–]ewk 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
What is there to be right about?
You certainly think you know something, but what you can you say that I know?
I tell people to read a book and I catch them lying when they pretend they have. That's not knowing anything.
It's called "literacy". Try it out.
[–]songhill 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日前 (19子コメント)
Zen is a branch or scion of Buddhism.
“there was never any such thing as an institutionally separate Chan “school” at any time in Chinese Buddhist history” ~ John R. McRae, Seeing through Zen: Encounter, Transformation, and Genealogy in Chinese Chan Buddhism
[–]ewk -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 2日前 (18子コメント)
Can't quote Zen Masters, can't make claims about what they say.
What's wrong? Isn't there any evidence for your claims in the lineage texts?
http://www.reddit.com/r/zen/wiki/lineagetexts
[–]songhill 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日前 (17子コメント)
You're the one who can't quote Zen masters who say that Zen is institutionally separate from Zen.
[–]ewk -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 2日前 (16子コメント)
You keep insisting that you can quote Zen Masters agreeing with Buddhists, but you can't.
All you got is insisting somebody prove your faith wrong when you can't even acknowledge that has never been real in the first place.
[–]songhill 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日前 (15子コメント)
Why would Zen masters say they are not Buddhists? If you theory is so apparent, where is the evidence?
[–]ewk -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 2日前 (14子コメント)
Why would a Zen Master cut a cat in half?
Why would a Zen Master slap a monk for bowing?
Why would a Zen Master hit somebody with a stick and call it "blowing off steam for the benefit of other people"?
Tune in next week to hear the Zen Master say, "A good thing is not as good as nothing."
You telling people that Zen involves whorshipping the sutras is dishonest.
[–]themojomike -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 2日前 (1子コメント)
Get lost troll.
[–]ewk -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
Let's play "Find the Troll".
I'll ask you a question. You ask me a question.
If we both answer honestly, then we can proceed to round two.
My question: "What do Buddhists believe?"
Remember to provide citations!
[–]AbbieSage 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日前 (1子コメント)
Sit and do nothing and become comfortable with doing nothing. You can't really do some elaborate and choreographed procedure with meditation. It's sitting quietly doing nothing.
[–]MaxNanasy 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
IDK about zazen, but some forms of meditation are more elaborate (e.g. the 16-step Anapanasati, which Buddha said could lead to liberation as a sole practice)
[–]yoga_throw 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
Sit on a cushion with your legs crossed. Rest your hands in your lap or on your knees. Rest your gaze at the floor a meter in front of you. Observe your breath. When thoughts arise let them go and return to observing the breath.
If new to meditation do this for 10 minutes twice a day. Every month, add ten more minutes to each sit until you're sitting for two hours per day. At that point you can add a third hour when you feel ready and desirous for it.
[–]cooye8Aed 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 19時間前 (0子コメント)
I have found vipassana meditation to be good preparation for zazen. The important thing is the emphasis on learning to observe (not control or suppress) thoughts and sensations.
Since Zazzen is a religious practice for Soto Buddhism, you should find a church to go to and ask there.
Zen Masters don't recommend practices generally and while several Zen Masters make fun of sitting meditation there remains a large Buddhist evangelical movement in the US that teaches primarily Zazen prayer-mediation and calls itself "Zen" in order to promote the religion to people who don't know any better.
[–]yoga_throw 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日前 (17子コメント)
Zen masters teach zazen. Read Zen: Tradition and Transition edited by Kenneth Graft. Most of the essays in the book address the importance of zazen in ancient and present day zen practice.
[–]ewk -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 2日前 (16子コメント)
You mean read books by people who aren't Zen Masters to find out what Zen Masters teach?
Awkward. It's like you are from a church and got no edu-cation.
Here: http://www.reddit.com/r/zen/wiki/lineagetexts
Try to keep your faith while studying the people that you claim to have faith in.
Zen Masters don't offer Zazen instructions.
Read a book.
[–]yoga_throw 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日前 (13子コメント)
I don't respond to copypasta.
[+]ewk スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 2日前 (12子コメント)
You don't have evidence for your beliefs.
Basically, they are made up.
[–]yoga_throw 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日前 (11子コメント)
I just posted evidence. An entire anthology of interviews with zen scholars, practitioners, and masters. You're blind.
[–]ewk -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 2日前 (10子コメント)
You can try to add to what Zen Masters say with your scholars and "practitioners" and anybody who pretends to be a Master, sure. That takes faith though.
If you don't study Zen though, then you are just a coward who makes stuff up and pretends other people said it.
[–]yoga_throw 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日前 (3子コメント)
In all seriousness, ewk, I think what our disagreement comes down to is that we have different viewpoints on what constitutes zen. I take a liberal approach and allow a zen center in my local city to qualify as zen. You take a conservative approach and only allow the some of the original canonical zen masters the criterion of qualifying as zen.
Can we agree on that? I think this describes why there's such a disparity between our ideas of zen (mine being Google friendly, for example) and yours being a more purist approach?
[–]ewk -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 2日前 (2子コメント)
No, we don't. You aren't being honest (again).
Everybody agrees that these people are what the name "Zen" refers to: http://www.reddit.com/r/zen/wiki/lineagetexts
You pretend that the name refers to your church so you can borrow the fame of the Zen lineage, but in the end you aren't honest enough to study Zen.
[–]zen_timezpress -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 2日前 (1子コメント)
lern rudimentary critical thinking skills
then study things that involve reasoning
zen aint magic
its isnt even more substantive than alice in wonderland
can learn the same thing from both
could learn all of zen by staring at a cup of hawaiian punch
or tripping on a rake
stop ackin like your e special
ur an egoist
[–]zen_timezpress -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 2日前 (5子コメント)
who is mor e of a coward
he who trusts him/erself
or he who is dependent on others
ur a child
[–]ewk -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 2日前 (4子コメント)
Read a book then you can teach me about cowardice.
[–]zen_timezpress 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日前 (3子コメント)
ok, when are you gonna be done writing it?
get a job
[–]ewk -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
Who's afraid of a paperback book?
[–]vastlytiny 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
They are all good. Pick the one you like.
[+]dota2nubNot even mind スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント 2日前 (0子コメント)
The guy who invented it wrote a book about it. I hear it's not very good. You could read that instead of asking in a completely unrelated subreddit.
π Rendered by PID 24820 on app-329 at 2015-10-10 03:14:04.780583+00:00 running 48a4a52 country code: JP.
[–]typondale 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]anotherjunkie 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]sirwolfThe observer 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]typondale 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]themojomike 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]dooj88 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]DaarioNuharisindependent 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]songhill 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (48子コメント)
[+]ewk スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント (47子コメント)
[–][deleted] 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]ewk -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (11子コメント)
[–][deleted] 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]ewk -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (9子コメント)
[–][deleted] 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]ewk -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (7子コメント)
[–][deleted] 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]ewk -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]-Nagarjuna- 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ewk -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]songhill 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (31子コメント)
[–]ewk -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (30子コメント)
[–]AbbieSage 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]ewk -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]KeyserSozen 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]ewk -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]KeyserSozen 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]ewk 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]songhill 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]ewk -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]songhill 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (17子コメント)
[–]ewk -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]songhill 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]ewk -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]themojomike -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ewk -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AbbieSage 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]MaxNanasy 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]yoga_throw 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]cooye8Aed 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ewk -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]yoga_throw 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (17子コメント)
[–]ewk -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]yoga_throw 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (13子コメント)
[+]ewk スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]yoga_throw 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]ewk -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]yoga_throw 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]ewk -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]zen_timezpress -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]zen_timezpress -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]ewk -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]zen_timezpress 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]zen_timezpress -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ewk -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]vastlytiny 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]dota2nubNot even mind スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント (0子コメント)