全 70 件のコメント

[–]yougonnagetit2L 33ポイント34ポイント  (6子コメント)

Alex, can I get things that judges don't care about for $500 please?

[–]KovarianJD 11ポイント12ポイント  (5子コメント)

Speak for your own judge. Mine definitely cares. :-P

[–]orm518Esq. 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

Mine did too.

[–]dbx99 18ポイント19ポイント  (1子コメント)

Mine took a bribe to send more juvies into privately run jails

[–]Jotebe 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

He was about to volunteer to save orphans but your failure to italicize finally proved morality is relative and drove him to a life of crime

[–]PraetorianXVIIIEsq. 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just piping in that none of mine do

[–]CivilBrocedureEsq. 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Mmmm... the fulfilling neuroses of people in positions of power.

[–]tonyb4863L 51ポイント52ポイント  (6子コメント)

Well, it should be italicized.

[–]PrestigiousGentleman 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

That's not the point.

[–]Schierke 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

The point (of the rule... agreed that it's not OP's point) is that there are a ton of meaningless technicalities in law that can be disastrous to ignore, and developing the attention to detail necessary to avoid fucking your clients' shit up all starts with learning in law school to italicize the whole id.

[–]nonameshere3L 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Find me an example other than law review where a brief gets tossed because of a non-italicized period.

Lolll get real

[–]Bibbity-boppity2L 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah I get that there are regional differences and what not but is there any style guide out there that actually says you shouldn't italicize here? Some people in this thread are smoking something.

[–]AtomicDuck 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It should be italicized, but I've never been able to tell the difference. I've tried to see a difference, but I can't.

[–]CupBeEmpty 8ポイント9ポイント  (12子コメント)

[–]silvere2Esq. 19ポイント20ポイント  (3子コメント)

On the right.

[–]Bibbity-boppity2L 16ポイント17ポイント  (2子コメント)

You can tell it's italicized because of the way it is.

[–]desparadacido 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

They don't think it be like it is, but it do.

[–]Schierke 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

Can't tell if you are testing the rest of us for blindness, or are blind yourself. It's so obviously the one on the right.

[–]CeyowenCt 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

No it's definitely the one on the left. You can see because the circle tilted slightly.

[–]Schierke -3ポイント-2ポイント  (2子コメント)

What the what?! Circles don't tilt. Or rather, a rotated circle doesn't look any different than the original circle. Don't they teach geometry at your law school? Jeez.

[–]nonameshere3L 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

IT SQUEEZES AND IS NO LONGER A PERFECT CIRCLE GIVING IT THE ILLUSION OF TILTING LIKE A FUCKING EGG TRYNA STAND UP

SUP BLOOD

[–]spirit_spineEsq. 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

DON'T FALL FOR IT GUYS.

"Italicize" isn't even a word.

[–]reeln166aJD 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

How can italics be real if our eyes aren't real?

[–]CupBeEmpty 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh you must be a Brit. Your people spell it "italicouze."

[–]naetdtJD 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not one Judge I've been before gives a flying fuck about italicized periods.

[–]kunagnis1L 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Great, another part I realize I've screwed up. Didn't think I'd find graders more anal than Biology lab professors til now ;)

[–]Daman091L 6ポイント7ポイント  (4子コメント)

That's why you underline

[–]ThebocaJJD 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Actually, this issue is exactly why I use italics instead of underlining. If I mis-italicize part of the cite, it is unlikely the reader will notice, but if I underline, it will be noticed by a sharp professor/clerk/partner/judge.

100% serious.

[–]gianini102L 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

My legal writing prof told us to italicize Id because she couldn't tell the difference in the period and it gave us leeway to miss one or ten.

[–]awmn4A3L 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Underlining went out with typewriters and is not really appropriate anymore.

[–]Brynden_Rivers_Esq2L 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Underlining makes the overall look of the document go down. It looks like garbage with no flow! Every document is a presentation.

[–]Schierke 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

What a fail grader. The period is part of the id., not "after" the id.

[–]thundahstruckEsq. 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I remember (1) marking things like this when I was a teaching assistant, and (2) caring about things like this when I started practicing.

[–]Schierke 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

"When you started"? What has happened to your pure standards now?

[–]bwice9 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good looking out, Ive got a memo due on Sunday and definitely would have missed that.