全 74 件のコメント

[–]NeoreactionSafe 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

The more grotesque the feminist myth becomes the easier it is to expose the myth as a myth.

Our goal is to attack the myth by undermining the emotions that keep it alive.

Understand this clearly... we never fight the surface layer of the myth. It's never a rational fight over details. Instead we are like snipers that attack the emotions of those who hold these myths so that they become discouraged.

Our job is to suck the life out of their mythology. We must make them feel tired of it.

We kill their spirit... just as we Kill the Beta... but in the hope that they become enlightened and free to improve afterwards.

We destroy in order to free truth from it's PC prison.

.

[–]LionLaw 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

The solution is pretty obvious:
Be an Alpha Fux.
Don't be a Beta Bux.

[–]Source1311 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah it's pretty simple isn't it - the answer to most of these posts is exactly that. I think it's the renewal of the fire which draws me back here. I keep getting amazed of the facts and statistics, the personal stories, the evolution of TRP.

[–]1oldredder 26ポイント27ポイント  (13子コメント)

All the more reason to never trust women and never be party to their hypergamy. If I know a woman's cheating on her husband or boyfriend to be with me I'll punish it. I'll lead her on then drop her like she's garbage. She should never be rewarded for her wrong behaviour. She should feel like a horrible person for trying - because she is

[–]cheeky_throwaway101 5ポイント6ポイント  (8子コメント)

This would be a great code to live by, if everyone could adopt this principle, even thirsty betas, it would help a great deal.

[–]1rp_valiant 2ポイント3ポイント  (7子コメント)

when has a woman ever cheated with a thirsty beta? It's not very common, it's usually alphas they meet at bars, the gym, yoga instructor, etc.

[–]cheeky_throwaway101 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

Trust me, when a woman gets bored. It doesn't matter who the other man is. I can personally vouch for being a thirsty Beta as an 18 year old, acne ridden with zero game. But when I worked at a female fashion store, married women were coming on to me at the staff party, wanting me to come out to their car to "talk".

You need to stop breaking things down into the simple dichotomy of Alpha and Beta. Women will cheat, branch swing etc. That is a given, don't kid yourself that they only move onto Alphas. They move onto whoever is there at the time.

I've seen women leave Alphas for the White Knight orbiter, just because they are "bored."

[–]1rp_valiant 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

you don't need to lecture me on the subtleties, sunshine. Alpha/Beta is a continuum, and the two terms originally existed to describe traits, not people. However, when you talk about "thirsty betas" that conjures a certain image of the meek lonely saddo. Sure, women occasionally cheat with those guys, but we're talking about probabilities. From reading TRP you should realise that when people talk in absolutes they're simply exclusing the "... in most cases" from the end of the sentence. Every rule has exceptions, that should be implicit.

[–]cheeky_throwaway101 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

I certainly didn't mean to sound condescending. I was just trying to point out, that although rare, it does happen. Women will always think the grass is greener.

[–]1rp_valiant 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

it does, but we can only really play by the numbers and the probability is higher that she'll cheat with a charismatic guy she meets in a club or at work compared to a lonely chubby man. Hence why I think it'd be more important for said "alphas" to not sleep with married women rather than thirsty betas.

[–]1oldredder 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

There is no continuum. Beta is unable to ever be alpha, and vice versa. It's forged in the womb and never changes. No exceptions.

[–]1rp_valiant 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

haha of course. All betas joining TRP are doomed to forever suckle at the teat of the post-wall munter.

[–]1oldredder 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've seen it happen plenty. The trick she's using is to trot out the guy so he can get a beating if he's not strong enough to fight back against the alpha because this violence entertains her.

[–]Pinkmistiscool 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Agree with never trusting a woman because, AWALT, but seriously? "Punishing" her hypergamy? A. That's exactly like punishing a fish for swimming around, (no matter how many times you try to teach the lesson, instinct will always take over). and B. even if you succeed, you are only serving to prop up the Beta tendencies of the husband/BF thereby ultimately hurting that fellow male because we all know hes unhappy in a deadbedroom and wont wake up from the nightmare until he sees her hypergamous ways.

[–]unassumingusername7 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

You reinstate civil society by disincentiving acting on hypergamy. You can't punish a woman for being hypergamous, but you sure as hell can for acting on it. And you should, if you want to maintain a working society. I don't know if it's actually possible to turn things back, but if someone wants to try, let them.

[–]Pinkmistiscool 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I can agree with you on the point of punishing the act in order to maintain a working society. We all know from TRP teachings that society and civilization are built upon the rock of Betas working hard to produce things to keep their women happy, and the rest of society shaming the women into staying with their Betas. I just think the "Overton window" has been moved so far toward the SJW/3rd wave feminism side that no amount of shaming or punishing is sending it back. Amost to the point of harming ones own self just by trying to "punish" a "special little snowflake". I think you are dead right by saying we should want to help, yet I believe I am dead right by saying there is no use in helping.

also, I think you meant "disincentivizing"

[–]1oldredder 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm happy to punish the wrong kind of fish for swimming around me. Either kill it to be rid of them or kill it for food.

even if you succeed, you are only serving to prop up the Beta

I'm good with that.

because we all know hes unhappy in a deadbedroom and wont wake up from the nightmare until he sees her hypergamous ways.

No. Even the beta male can get lots of good sex. Being beta does not mean having women always go dry-vagina. Beta is the follower. Not a failure. Beta males follow alpha males.

This subreddit badly abuses the terms beta and alpha into opposite and irrational meanings that are all wrong. NATURE defines alpha & beta, scientists have described this for centuries. TRP is 100% off base by inventing its own definitions that are in disagreement.

[–]Zinamam 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Which is why feminists love the idea of authoritarianism.

They can marry the state and fuck alphas whilst the betas pay more into the system but get none of the benefits.

[–]LukeMcFuckStick 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Feminism is headed wherever cultural Marxism wants it to head.

[–]howard333 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good breakdown. I believe this is all part of a larger political program conducted by western social planners. Notice how Democrat anti-war sentiments evaporated after 2008. The seamless continuation of the Bush foreign policy, e.g. the war in Afghanistan was sold to them as women's lib. Have a look at the NGO industry and how many of them focus on exporting feminism to the empire's periphery a.k.a. developing countries. We all know how the corporate media is pushing this stuff.

This is "soft-power" population control, like China's one-child policy, just a little more sophisticated. I've been focusing on the manosphere lately because the fucked up state of gender relations has been the greatest source of misery in my adult life, and other men feel the same way. What hits you in the balls is more personal, easier to give a shit about, than all the other things wrong with the world.

I'm starting to see how it all leads back to that though. Some obvious connections to follow... consider what the shitty American diet and mass psych medication have done to the sexual marketplace, and the corporate/government origins of those things.

[–]Pkbeefatude 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

The problem is Patriarchy is literally civilization. There is no evidence of lasting and prosperous female dominated societies, only male dominated.

As we know, men build and do.

To destroy the patriarchy is to destroy our concept of civilization and fall back to a pre-Neolithic harem based tribal society...which is sort of happening if you think about it.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 3ポイント4ポイント  (5子コメント)

I always get butthurt blue pill types accuse me of writing nothing but "bitter rants" or "pseudo-intellectual hocum." Honestly, watching that video, I think the stuff I write as well as TRP itself is about 100 magnitudes closer to reality than any feminist horse shit.

FYI that video is total sophistry, she owes all her wealth to being a sophist for contemporary feminism. The level of truth in her words is ridiculously low, somewhere near absolute zero.

[–]pyrrhic_victor 6ポイント7ポイント  (4子コメント)

You know, Feminism isn't about reality. It's about crafting a reality tunnel of subjugation, and setting it as the paragon of dogma for the age. I wonder when the Christian Church will realize it has been usurped.

[–]KingMinish 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think Christianity has more staying power when times are hard. When shit hits the fan feminism won't be able to hold its ground nearly as well as Christianity and hope for the afterlife.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Don't feel an upvote is enough to say how gold this is. Brilliant comment, just brilliant.

[–]pyrrhic_victor 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

That means a lot, coming from you. I cannot convey how much your writings have helped me over the past year, but that "pseudo-intellectual hocum" Antibiotic Nuke sparked truth within my blue-mindprogrammed brain. Thank you.

[–]SPICY_BUTT_MILK 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Of course. In what area of life do women ever engage in hard reality on reality's terms? It's always about fantasy and idealism and spinning that hamster wheel.

[–]silver_nuke13 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

Op you forgot uk trying to ban facesitting from porn (choke hazard lol) and the urge to ban (only female) sex bots because "it's unethical" (not only they project their feelings on a machine but are afraid of being replaced. I mean, who wouln't want a girlfriend with no drama, no need for expensive food, condoms, can lift a ton and looks however you like?; they're lobbying against to make sure we won't develop it to that level)

[–]maddox45 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

But its perfectly fine that vibrators and dildos have been around for 100 years. All hail the amazing "pussy pass".

[–]silver_nuke13 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Invented by men doctors, mind you

[–]Pkbeefatude 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah where is the outcry about the unrealistic standards created by dildos?

They are bigger, harder and can vibrate at hundreds of RPMS or swoop around like some crazy tentacle.

my dick cant do that =(

[–]votava926 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

You pretty much could have just made that last part a normal sentence without the () bullcrap

[–]silver_nuke13 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

You are good at observing things. Wow.

[–]the_red_scimitar 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hilariously, the more they "succeed", the more they lose. There's already a counter-movement among women, and I'm running into more and more younger women who definitely do not want to have the label "feminist". Wondering how much further it'll go before they just eat themselves, as we know how well they work together.

[–]ShitfacedBatman 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Patriarchy is eternal and undestroyable. There will always be a need for provider/protector duties whether you're an individual or in an LTR. Thus, the "matriarch" is still a patriarch. You don't get out of the provider/protector duties and roles needing to be fulfilled and performed - ever.

If a woman wants to become "the patriarch" and wear the pants in a relationship, well, she can become Ms. Fugly and find a feminine nurturer/caregiver type of guy all she wants. 99 times out of a 100, women that choose this path HATE it, have turbulent relationships, and are remorseful.

Protip for the ladies: you're not gonna find a quality man by becoming a man.

[–]EuronPacificus 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

STOP USING HER NAME. PLEASE.

[–]WolfenSatyr 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

She's a demon, using her name gives her power

[–]flyercomet 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think making something taboo gives it power. I'd rather just call things as they are.

[–]csehszlovakze 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

If feminism succeeds in the western world they'll just create a power vacuum which will be filled by something much more patriarchal: sharia law. They'll cry their current life back but it'll be way too late for regrets...

[–]watch_ping 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just look at the UK today. Sad sorry state.

[–]Stythe 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I don't know that this is as planned as you make it seem the impression I get from a lot of feminist/PC/SJW crap is that some pussy gets butthurt and throws a temper tantrum so loud others get hypnotized and go along with it for the attention or whatever. Then they get what they want and it just moves in without any planning or forethought. The big issue I see is that it's happened so much so quickly that people need to seriously get back on track of society won't last. Sadly, its at a point where the current generation of parents was raised by the shittiest generation of parents and the parents before them are mostly dead so we're SOL for guidance and nobody seems to know what to do, or have the balls to do anything about it. Those that do are too few to make a change.

[–]nomad-oz[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I didn't think it was planned. I've been reading a lot of different articles about relationships and this the underlying progressive trend.

However if you visit Invisible Serfs Collar you can read about the methods the progressives use to achieve their social changes. Feminists use the same tactics. It only takes a few vocal people at the top and the herd will follow.

[–]Stythe 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

That could be interesting. Thanks for the link, Ill take a gander at it. And yeah, the loudest people are the ones who usually get the most publicity. Sadly, the quiet ones are usually too busy being involved in something productive to speak up. That, or they deliberately don't get involved.

[–]Futdashukup 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Anyone who has to work with women will tell you they are fucking hard work. I mean, no offence, but fuck you, girls.

[–]MyRedAccount 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's some fairly interesting information out there if you challenge 2 correctly.

[–]Anon_namdre 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

One of my worst fears as a college senior is accidentally regret raping some dumb bitch and getting blacklisted from society for the rest of my life.

[–]Longest_username 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Patriarchy = Men.

From my POV you're slightly off the mark here.

There are two sides to patriarchy.

The side which helps you become a man that leads, shares value and does things not only for his own greatness, but to make the world better for others. This type of mature masculinity allows you to argue and discuss with others without personally attacking them or getting physical.

Sounds cheesy, but alot of the well respected guys on TRP are like this. They always offer value in it's most honest form and will take their time to help those trying to learn.

The other side of patriachy is the immature, hateful, destruction and vengeful type. These guys will try and argue with you for any reason possible just to score some validation points or to bring you down. They don't give a shit about others and are usually me me me me. These men are driven so far down into negativity, that the thought of rape and domestic violence are not unrealistic.

Each man has both sides in him, to some extent. Some can show the first types qualities most of the time, and will only slip up when they're put in a rage or dealing with a complete retard.

Some of the others live in the second type more of the time. The rest are moving between the two.

IMO It's the second type of man feminists hate and fear. Not ALL men.

Maybe I've got my head in the clouds, who knows.

[–]quietthomas -2ポイント-1ポイント  (4子コメント)

That's a lot of dumb. For starters, sex positivism is a hallmark of 3rd wave feminism. So that 3rd point on your list doesn't work.

Also, "Stay tuned for the sexual equality means she should be able to penetrate him also, advertising campaign, because a real man caters to her kinks. You’ve been warned. Get ready to Bend over Boys." this is HILARIOUS! Where the fuck did you get that from. That's just not how female sexuality works in most cases, it's retarded.

I think you're way off. Female Sexual Agency just means more variety of sex (because both genders will be getting bored), less consistency (because marriage will require two people who have given up on getting that variety).

It's a brave new world, but not something to be so terrified about. Trust me, we're not going to go from a consent culture, to a culture of men being peg-raped by rabid fems. That's just ridiculous.

[–]silver_nuke13 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

The pink glasses look funny on you

Feminism is more sinister than you think, and all you did was rejecting ab absurdo. FEMINISM IS NOT YOUR FRIEND. They are looking to shift power, hurt us and create a power void which to fill. But they aren't ready for it and we will go to shit.

[–]1sir_wankalot_here 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think you're way off. Female Sexual Agency just means more variety of sex (because both genders will be getting bored), less consistency (because marriage will require two people who have given up on getting that variety).

You are touching on a good point here, but you are not analysing it deep enough. Back in 1400, women had very few employment opportunities. About the only two I can think of is whore and serving wench ☺

Starting from the industrial revolution onwards the amount of different types of employment a woman could do increased. Overly simplified higher technology means for the user of that technology less skill.

So even if there wasn't divorce rape etc, you still see the same trends. So the woman still will ride the CC, not to the same degree granted. If she has a few bastards she then looks for a BB to support her.

From an economics point this makes sense. Why should she settle for a BB right away when she can have AF and most likely get a BB afterwards. If she can't worse case scenario she has to actually work.

[–]Kolbath 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

You are touching on a good point here, but you are not analysing it deep enough. Back in 1400, women had very few employment opportunities. About the only two I can think of is whore and serving wench ☺

Washer woman, seamstress, and house servant. (You may have been thinking of that in your wench. Typically a wench is a barmaid server, while a servant is slightly higher class.)

Starting from the industrial revolution onwards the amount of different types of employment a woman could do increased. Overly simplified higher technology means for the user of that technology less skill.

Sort of. The removal of direct personal strength, say by replacing a blacksmith with an auto-hammer, opened many fields to women. It didnt necessarily reduce the amount of skill involved. However, as we moved from manipulation of the world to manipulation of data, more female-centric positions opened up, so your point is still valid.

So even if there wasn't divorce rape etc, you still see the same trends. So the woman still will ride the CC, not to the same degree granted. If she has a few bastards she then looks for a BB to support her.

This is true no matter what. I know three women who had decent careers that shat out kids and decided they didn't want to return to work. Now daddy is stuck working extra hours and never seeing his child because he has to replace her fucking salary in what was supposed to be an equal partnership.

Note that I advocate a return to the mom at home nuclear family of the 40s and 50s, which was one of the strongest periods of American culture. However I do not advocate a return to it at the expense of men after a marriage is entered into as a partner contract of relatively equal money earners.

From an economics point this makes sense. Why should she settle for a BB right away when she can have AF and most likely get a BB afterwards. If she can't worse case scenario she has to actually work.

And we end up with another single mother child, raised by television and video games and the Internet, contributing nothing to society.

[–]nomad-oz[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just pointing out the trend... and using hyperbole to make a point.