上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]VCUBNFO[S] 2035ポイント2036ポイント  (958子コメント)

The tactics included hiring black women to be seen pushing baby carriages in white neighborhoods

... wow

EDIT: Shameless plug for an amazing HBO miniseries about housing segregation and public housing. It's based off real events that happened in Yonkers, New York.

[–]corndog161 302ポイント303ポイント  (104子コメント)

Wow I assumed they dialed up the negative racial stereotypes to really scare people but fucking baby carriages?

[–]lollerkeet 423ポイント424ポイント  (32子コメント)

They're here... they're multiplying...

[–]acannon 139ポイント140ポイント  (7子コメント)

Blacknado

[–]princerules666 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Chocolate Rain.

No really, this is what that song is about.

[–]Milk_Cows [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Chocolate Rain

Raised your neighborhood insurance rates

Chocolate Rain

Makes us happy living in a gate

Chocolate Rain

History quickly crashing through your veins

Chocolate Rain

Using you to fall back down again

[–]pkkisthebomb 43ポイント44ポイント  (19子コメント)

-Blacks in the city

[–]willyolio 122ポイント123ポイント  (18子コメント)

honestly, i think it would be hilarious to make a pseudo-horror film like this.

all the white folk are freaking out, locking their doors, packing and rushing out of the neighbourhood, everyone speaking in hushed voices... it's like Signs

and then at the end of the film the horrifying monster is revealed: a black woman pushing a baby carriage.

[–]ChemicalRascal 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

And we're loooooosing control

[–]1gnominious 245ポイント246ポイント  (40子コメント)

Have some scruffy looking dude wandering around and people would call the cops to have him removed. Dude could have come from anywhere or just be passing through so people won't think much of it. Also he'd rat out the realtors because they're not paying him enough to deal with racist cops.

Now use a women with a baby in a carriage and people are going to be more reluctant to report her and the cops will be more reluctant to arrest her for no reason. The baby also represents an anchor. She's not pushing that carriage for miles so that means she's living nearby and there are more of them. It's not just some rich bachelor, but an entire family, maybe even several. They're here to stay.

[–]corndog161 26ポイント27ポイント  (37子コメント)

Good points. Those sneaky realtors!

[–]Jazzhands_trigger_me 27ポイント28ポイント  (36子コメント)

Worst part it would probably still work in some neighbourhoods...

[–]Pierre_Poutine90 64ポイント65ポイント  (11子コメント)

Especially if she's wearing a hijab and inviting neighbours over for Ramadan dinner.

[–]2242234 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

I would love to go and have Ramadan dinner with a Muslim family if I was invited, but unfortunately in the neighborhood we live in Muslim people don't seem to be interested in becoming part of the community. When they walk down the street the adults walk in groups and don't seem to acknowledge anybody around them. The kids are great though they will play with all the other kids. So there is hope.

[–]achabachacha 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

Actually, market value of Muslim neighborhood goes through the roof due to low/no crimes. The surrounding areas, I can't say much about.

[–]MrJHound 49ポイント50ポイント  (21子コメント)

Hi, I'm James, black guy.

I have a friend whose grandparents are so racist that I had to hide in the trunk so that I wouldn't be seen in the car with them as they passed by their grandparents' house.

When asked if I could ever come over, they told her, "No, baby. You just see them out and at school, you don't bring 'em to the house..."

[–]Jazzhands_trigger_me 17ポイント18ポイント  (18子コメント)

I wish this was a bad joke. Things are getting better most places but still..A long way to go to the dream some places. Stories like yours makes me lose hope in parts of humanity.

[–]MrJHound 38ポイント39ポイント  (16子コメント)

You know, Oprah said that for the racism to go away, it has to die out with the older generations. People got mad at her for saying it, but I feel like those are the people she was talking about and they might as well be proving her right.

[–]EditorialComplex 24ポイント25ポイント  (9子コメント)

Yeah, but as much as the younger generations think we're better, we aren't.

OK, that's not fair to us: We're certainly better in a lot of ways. Most younger people wouldn't say stuff like that, for instance. There's a perception that "racism is bad."

But there's also a whole lot of casual racism that I think we as the younger generations are way too comfortable with. (See: Coontown and a lot of other places on Reddit).

[–]Xaguta 28ポイント29ポイント  (2子コメント)

Wait, Coontown qualified as casual racism?

[–]chillbroswagginzz 30ポイント31ポイント  (4子コメント)

Oprah also said that atheists can't experience awe and wonder. She's perfectly comfortable labeling an entire group essentially sub-human for their beliefs, as long as it's not race based. I see this as a more accepted, casual form of bigotry that, somehow, she doesn't see the irony in.

[–]HadrasVorshoth 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've heard a similar thing in a Cold War espionage handbook (it's surprising how much of this stuff is just floating around as pdfs on the net. There's tons of information from disguises to how to speak to maintain cover, to how to defuse bombs. It's nuts how much info is freely available.).

A single man travelling alone may be a spy. Same with a single woman. Even a kid on its own, if justified somehow, is probably a midget spy. But a man, woman, and a kid? Probably a family on holiday to most security agencies, because coordinating multiple agents and a child to keep undercover is unlikely.

[–]dardanmm 39ポイント40ポイント  (7子コメント)

For me it was not surprising at all, knowing real estate agents

[–]MyfanwyTiffany 36ポイント37ポイント  (6子コメント)

[–]dardanmm 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Always love how they go to kinda hating each other to pure joy

[–]Shitty_Bollocks 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

What a wonderful start to my day

[–]MyfanwyTiffany 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Thanks, what a wonderful compliment to end my night!

[–]BLOOD_ASCENSION 12ポイント13ポイント  (3子コメント)

but fucking baby carriages?

yes, but the baby was eating a piece of fried chicken while smoking weed and screamin "where the white bitches at"

[–]VeggiePaninis 13ポイント14ポイント  (6子コメント)

It was more than just local fear tactics. Govt subsidized FHA mortgages had explicit rules in them saying they could not be issues to blacks. Meaning that middle class blacks couldn't move to other neighborhoods and get the benefits of living in middle class neighborhoods. One of the largest producers of wealth over the last century was via appreciating housing, which blacks that were doing well were completely excluded from.

And suburbs when built would have rules written into the deeds saying that they could not be sold to blacks. Racism really was part of the rule of law for ~70% of the 20th century.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:m--mqQRIjOIJ:www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/the-racist-housing-policy-that-made-your-neighborhood/371439/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

[–]catmoon [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Oh, it goes so much further than just not selling to blacks.

FHA had a rating system for neighborhoods and could not underwrite a loan in a neighborhood with a bad rating. "Inharmonious racial groups" was one of the main risk categories. In practice, the mere presence of a "foreigner or negro" would make a whole neighborhood ineligible for FHA loans.

So if a singly black person moved into your neighborhood it would be very difficult to sell your home because the buyer would either need to pay in cash or use private financing. This is one of the primary reasons why the US is so segregated today.

[–]msfayzer [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

My mother was told as a child in the 1960s to never tell anyone that her father was a Jew because they would lose their home. They had signed off saying that they would never sell their home to Jews. 'Merica.

[–]TW-Luna 107ポイント108ポイント  (21子コメント)

Off topic but...

 

I can no longer see the name Yonkers without thinking about World War Z. (The book)

[–]dangerkart 12ポイント13ポイント  (3子コメント)

I can't see it without thinking of that song from Hello, Dolly!

out there, there's a world outside of Yonkers, way out there beyond this hicktown, Barnabyyyy, listen, Barnabyyyy

[–]2SP00KY4ME8 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

...Wow, me too. That was such an oddly specific thing I never even bothered mentioning it because I didn't think anyone would share it.

[–]King_elessar 80ポイント81ポイント  (127子コメント)

Is it fair to say that society is implicitly racist ? A similar thing is happening in my neighborhood but it's the influx of Muslims that's driving the house prices down .

[–]BaronECM 82ポイント83ポイント  (20子コメント)

we are getting a bunch of middle easterners and indians. The amount of notices the apartment complex sends out reminding people of leaving trash out and other problems has skyrocketed.

[–]Crioca 14ポイント15ポイント  (4子コメント)

Is it fair to say that society is implicitly racist?

Implicitly racist? No because racism is not an essential feature of a society.

But it would be fair to say that humans are inherently inclined towards racism. It's one of those legacy behavioral mechanisms we have to train ourselves to overcome.

[–]OverweightGamerGril 13ポイント14ポイント  (1子コメント)

Humans are resistant to change. Regardless of the implications, if you see someone who doesn't fit what you grew up with, you'll notice. That doesn't make someone inherently racist, that's just noticing a difference in a pattern. The actions that come AFTER that realization may be racist, but acknowledging someone's skin color or background isn't.

[–]Crioca 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Right, and I didn't say that humans are inherently racist. I said that we're inherently inclined towards racism. i.e that in the absence of external factors (such as education, experience) we're more likely to make negative assumptions about people who we don't identify with based on their appearance. It's a pretty safe bet that this is an evolved trait.

It's not just race though, so maybe racism isn't the right word, xenophobia is maybe a better fit. There's not really a good word for "instinctive wariness of people whose appearance is outside what we identify with.

[–]macabre_irony 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

I think it's fair to say that nearly everyone is guilty of some degree of prejudice and stereotyping. This doesn't make it right but it's just the reality of the world we live in. The socio-economic lines get blurry especially when they bleed over into race. Most people, if they can afford it, want to move away from areas of higher crime and violence, regardless of their ethnicity. So, this leads to phenomenons like blockbusting or white flight but it also leads to gentrification of once affordable, higher crime areas. So all of these things derive from a nasty blend of stereotyping, racism, elitism, xenophobia, the perceived idea of wanting a better and safer life...but at some level, when it comes to choosing where we reside, and aspire to reside, most of us are all guilty of it to varying degrees.

[–]Stockguy777 10ポイント11ポイント  (4子コメント)

White flight is actually still a thing. Just not as bad as it used to be. I don't remember the exact number of the last study I read but I am pretty sure it was 12%. If you get an all white neighborhood, no one goes anywhere if 1 or 2% black or brown moves in.

Once it gets to a threshold percentage (once again, I think it is 12%). The white people start leaving. Its not just America either, its happening in Ireland right now as well. Immigrants move in, whites move outside of the city and build a suburb that never existed. Wash, rinse, repeat.

[–]SpeakLikeAChild04 48ポイント49ポイント  (16子コメント)

Show Me A Hero was an excellent miniseries that gets a 10/10 from me. It was made by David Simon, the creator of The Wire and directed by Paul Haggis, the director of Crash.

I've been following racial and housing issues in America and in Europe over the past year and found the miniseries to be very timely and informative because the same battles are still playing out in America over and over again. If you want to learn a bit about racial housing issues and issues of segregation then you should check out these links here.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/15/opinion/edsall-who-will-pay-the-political-price-for-affordable-housing.html?_r=0

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/421389/attention-americas-suburbs-you-have-just-been-annexed-stanley-kurtz

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-fair-housing-rules-20150708-story.html

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-fair-housing-20150709-story.html

Spoilers for SMAH in this NY Times link. It talks about the actual events that inspired the miniseries so it gives things away.

The well-off county of West Chester in New York state has the Obama Administration demanding that they build affordable housing projects in the county. They're refusing to do so and the fight over it has been going on for years now and is still going on. It's basically a repeat of what happened in Yonkers in the 80s and early 90s.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/08/business/economy/housing-program-expansion-would-encourage-more-low-income-families-to-move-up.html

Be sure to read the comments in the NY Times links. It's gotten pretty interesting lately to see the subscribers revolting against the Times's blatant pro-diversity and pro-immigration bias in the editorial section. This has been very apparent since the immigration/refugee crisis took shape and got major attention. This isn't an opinion, this is just how it has gotten in the Times and a lot of commenters have noticed.

Everyone should be interested in this stuff. People are deciding what your neighborhoods are going to look like in the future and you're not exactly being given much of a say in it. If you don't pay attention, you'll wake up in the not-too-distant-future and see that your community doesn't look like your community anymore.

[–]socsa [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

If you don't pay attention, you'll wake up in the not-too-distant-future and see that your community doesn't look like your community anymore.

Holy dog whistle batman.

[–]aescolanus 13ポイント14ポイント  (7子コメント)

If you don't pay attention, you'll wake up in the not-too-distant-future and see that your community doesn't look like your community anymore.

I'm sorry, did you mean to sound like Cartman complaining about minorities at his waterpark, or are you just oblivious to how much of a racist douche you come off as?

[–]JB_UK 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's interesting to see the increased sophistication of racists on reddit.

The guy moves from advocating for a David Simon documentary about racism in public housing, to advocating for racism in public housing, within five paragraphs of text.

[–]socsa [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This has been going on for a while. The only thing which has changed as of late is that these posts don't get buried like they should anymore.

[–]Neo_Techni 330ポイント331ポイント  (631子コメント)

Lol. I don't pity anyone stupid enough to fall for it.

[–]Bardfinn30 1582ポイント1583ポイント  (598子コメント)

We should. Most of the people who fell for this were people who had invested a large amount of their labour into building their family's futures, and were reliant upon society to not victimise them.

The "Oh shit the negroes are coming" rhetoric of the 1950's and 1960's victimised white people as well as black people — by persuading poor white people and white people of modest means that black people were their enemy, they spent a huge amount of resources and time and effort in fighting black people — including fighting them from attaining equal social status and equal rights.

Guess where all that capital spent on fighting flowed to.

No man is an island — we are all interconnected. Imagine how much better America and the world could be today if shitty racism were not being perpetuated then, and were not being perpetuated now.

[–]VCUBNFO[S] 402ポイント403ポイント  (445子コメント)

No man is an island — we are all interconnected. Imagine how much better America and the world could be today if shitty racism were not being perpetuated then, and were not being perpetuated now.

That is actually how I found it. I was wondering why my city had gone down in population since the 1970s .... and it turns out this is why.

As someone who despises the suburbs and loves the city, it was interesting to see that racism/segregation was the a contributing cause of the suburbs.

It looks like we're now going through "gentrification."

[–]Nacho_Average_Libre 148ポイント149ポイント  (65子コメント)

Racism was certainly a driving force in the suburbanization of America. But it's important to remember it want the only force. Returning GI's wanted space for families and in all honesty, it was cheaper and easier to throw up some wood frame construction three miles outside the city center. The highway act followed, which is the origin of exurban sprawl. White flight only started once the tax base of the inner city collapsed. The supermegahardcore racism came with the destruction of the city itself to make way for more highways and the relocation to the projects.

[–]fuckemthrowaway 127ポイント128ポイント  (34子コメント)

also, the no interest loans, and low interest loans white GIs used to move their families to the suburbs were denied to black soldiers.

[–]revisionist 51ポイント52ポイント  (31子コメント)

It's crazy to realize that despite everything reddit says about how "the baby boomers had it easier", there has never been a better time economically to be black than within the last 25 years. It's kind of encouraging and also kind of sad.

[–]Hautamaki 22ポイント23ポイント  (1子コメント)

nobody who pines for the 'good old days' is likely to be gay, a visible minority, or a woman.

[–]Jackpot777 46ポイント47ポイント  (4子コメント)

"Here's how great it is to be white — I can get into a time machine and go to any time and it would be fuckin' awesome when I get there! That is exclusively a white privilege! Black people can't fuck with time machines. A black guy in a time machine is like, 'Hey anything before 1980, no thank you, I don't wanna go.'"

— Louis C.K.

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/NoEqualOpportunityTimeTravel

[–]snarpy 58ポイント59ポイント  (8子コメント)

Whether it really was "cheaper" is a bit of a fudge there, as the government absolutely poured money into suburban housing and highways... egged on by very large-scale contracting corporations.

I'd like to see a source for your assertion that white flight only started "when the tax base of the inner city collapsed", since that's certainly not the assertion of a lot of major historians on the issue. Racism, and classism, was at the forefront of the trend towards suburbanization as far back as the mid 1800s.

[–]noworryhatebombstill 17ポイント18ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'd say that the trend towards suburbanization goes farther back than modern concepts of racism. I've just finished reading Robert Bruegmann's Sprawl: A Compact History, and while the book is far from perfect, he argues fairly convincingly that decentralizing forces have existed in cities since, essentially, urbanization itself. The downsides of density (disease and pollution, mostly) have driven the wealthy to establish exurban residences or estates for millennia-- think Roman villas, the English Lakes District, or summer manors in the colonial Chesapeake. The concentration of people and industry that pulled populations in from the hinterlands simultaneously pushed those who could leave, even if just seasonally, to suburban/exurban areas. In essence, you have inmigration and outmigration existing simultaneously due to largely the same factors. By the 1600s, London's density curve had flattened out, inmigration and outmigration hanging in balance. By the 1700s, most other developed European cities followed suit. The expansion of affluent classes in the Industrial Revolution, followed by new transit technologies, simply tipped the balance in decentralization's favor in both the US and Europe. The rise of the industrial city (which we typically imagine as an engine of urbanization) actually coincided with the start of a steady decline in core density from the beginning of the 19th century.

I don't mean to diminish the role of racism in determining the form and financing of American suburbs (and, on that token, I think Bruegmann is less convincing as he starts discussing the 20th century US). But I do think that it's important to remember that suburbanization is not a solely American or even a modern process.

[–]VeggiePaninis 25ポイント26ポイント  (1子コメント)

The reason part of it was cheaper was because the government heavily subsidized construction of suburbs with laws stating that only whites could move in. For example FHA loans (which had ~0 down payment and subsidies to make them cheaper than renting) from their inception in the 1930s until 1968 had language in them banning them from being issued to blacks or in black neighborhoods.1

Most of the newly built suburbs as well had explicit laws written into them saying the could not be sold to blacks. A lot of the growth of suburbs was more directly tied to racism than your post implies. A well document example is Levvittown, NY; considered the model and birth of suburbanization.2

There were still other factors, but it was one of the most significant factors in the growth of suburbs from the beginning.

[1] http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:m--mqQRIjOIJ:www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/the-racist-housing-policy-that-made-your-neighborhood/371439/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levittown,_New_York#History

[–]captainthataway 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Returning GIs after WWII were given housing loans. Black GIs weren't. All the neighborhoods outside of NYC and on Long Island are proof of this.

[–]jrobelen 27ポイント28ポイント  (27子コメント)

As someone who despises the suburbs and loves the city, it was interesting to see that racism/segregation was the cause of the suburbs.

This is a damnable generalization.

[–]VCUBNFO[S] 11ポイント12ポイント  (25子コメント)

You're right. I should have said "a contributing cause"

[–]willmaster123 29ポイント30ポイント  (20子コメント)

It was probably the major cause however. The more I study the subject the more I realize how much race had to do with it. In the span of 5-10 years many neighborhoods demographics were RAPIDLY changing. Black people were moving in very fast, and in an almost knee jerk reaction, white people would leave just as fast. In almost every single city, the moment the black population begins rising, the white population slows or declines (in the 40s-60s, not today). If it had less to do about race and more to do with other factors, the white population leaving would have happened a lot more gradually, but instead there is an almost direct correlation.

Then, in the 1964-1969 era, the race riots accelerated white flight. 1968 specifically was the year when whites left cities in spades, almost as a direct result of the MLK riots. After that, the process more or less evened out. There was another minor era of white flight from 1977-1982, then another in the late 80s and early 90s in Italian Irish neighborhoods in the northeast in response to the crack epidemic, but besides that most of our cities have been gaining white populations.

People were really racist back then.

[–]fillingtheblank 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

This whole story is a perfect illustration of our system. How very smart people with no ethics capitalize on spreading fear and irrationality to ignorant hateful masses while dividing them and making them unable to see the larger con behind.

[–]Big_Baby_Jesus_ 98ポイント99ポイント  (14子コメント)

The "Oh shit the negroes are coming" rhetoric of the 1950's and 1960's victimised white people as well as black people

Come on. Black people had it way, way worse. If you sold your house at a loss due to the sight of black people, then you made a bad business decision and I don't feel sorry for you.

[–]Bardfinn30 25ポイント26ポイント  (11子コメント)

Yes, black people had it worse; the people who sold at a loss, sold at a loss because of a co-ordinated campaign teaching them that black people were inhuman.

[–]iIOxqdKDgoC6R0Jj 12ポイント13ポイント  (3子コメント)

Surely there's some moral responsibility to resist and call out that kind of brainwashing?

[–]Alienm00se 73ポイント74ポイント  (10子コメント)

No, we shouldn't, these people drank the Ku-Klux-Koolaid and made the decision to sell their homes at a loss just to avoid being around black people. They're grown ups, for God's sake, nobody forced them to be racist assholes.

[–]Muppetude 38ポイント39ポイント  (8子コメント)

It's possible that not all of them were racist. Keep in mind that most of these people had invested the bulk of their net worth into their homes. If they were tricked into thinking that something was about to happen that would lower the value of their single most important investment, one can hardly blame them for selling, even if they personally thought it was ridiculous that a black family moving would lower property values. Ultimately they had a family to provide for.

[–]theageofnow 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Guess where all that capital spent on fighting flowed to.

Small crappy unethical neighborhood real estate brokers and agents who were all mostly living commission-to-commission and spent money like a sailor when they got it.

[–]Ariadnepyanfar 14ポイント15ポイント  (3子コメント)

Today Muslims are the 'threats' that we are fearful and fighting 'back' at.

[–]Polandski 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nah man, it's bigger than that. Arabs, Mexicans, and even Black Americans are still treated worse in American society. It's quite sad.

[–]McJBeck 38ポイント39ポイント  (13子コメント)

You honestly have to be the biggest fucking dumbass to believe that white people were victimized at all during the 1900s. Who do you think started the hate against black people, the black people? No, white people became racist on their own accord, and the real estate agents were only capitalizing off of the racism and stupidity of society. Based on this post, it doesn't appear as though they added to the stereotypes given to black people, they literally just made it look like a black person was moving in. Not the real estate agent's fault if white people were scared simply by the thought of a black person just living near them.

[–]SerLava 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

"White people" isn't a team, man. It was rich mostly-white fucks stepping on all kinds of people.

Yes - I also acknowledge the previous poster said "oh it was samesy samesy for white people and black people"

[–]Pipthepirate 65ポイント66ポイント  (8子コメント)

Even if a person isn't racist it can be a scary idea to think the property you have invested in is going to go down in value.

[–]maharito 25ポイント26ポイント  (3子コメント)

But it was fiendishly smart of the realtor: If enough stupids fell for it, everyone on the block lost no matter how smart they were.

[–]avenues_behind 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

A black person moving into the neighborhood absolutely killed property values back then. You aren't stupid for trying to protect your money.

[–]trowawufei 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

Except not because black people were clearly willing to pay good money for those houses.

[–]Geminii27 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

The black people lost because the houses were being snapped up and onsold to them at much higher rates. If they'd been white they'd have been able to find properties at far lower prices - they were being effectively penalized for being black.

[–]Yglorba 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

They're not stupid. Like I said above, that's the worst part. Once a property agent has set this up, homeowners who realize what is happening are basically screwed, because if you refuse to move, but all your neighbors sell all at once -- bam, property values will collapse from the rush of sales, and there goes all the money you invested in your home.

The belief that black people living in the neighborhood lowers your property values (and even the belief that they're going to move in) leads to a self-fulfilling vicious cycle; it's easy to say "oh, I wouldn't be stupid enough to fall for it", but if your neighbors are, and you aren't, then guess what? You're going to get screwed anyway. Nobody wants to be the last one to sell, so everyone jumps ship. Even if you're not racist at all, the worry that your neighbors might be puts you in a position where you have to sell to avoid losing everything, which makes the pressure even worse on everyone else. As a result, you end up with the entire system becoming heinously racist, even if the individual people are mostly just mildly racist at worst.

(Granted, sometimes they're a lot wore than that -- but it doesn't take an entire population of complete monsters to set it off. And because it's focused on people's reactions as a group, you can be screwed even if you see exactly what's going on.)

[–]hokeyphenokey 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't get it. Black women have been taking care of white babies for hundreds of years. It was a non-paying job at first and then it was a paying job later.

[–]peetie_p 956ポイント957ポイント  (51子コメント)

After attracting both national media attention and government scrutiny, "Blockbusters" were eventually forced to abandon the practice and resigned themselves to running a video rental franchise.

[–]VCUBNFO[S] 541ポイント542ポイント  (39子コメント)

Yet, again, they refused to accept that change was coming.

[–]TruthFromAnAsshole 114ポイント115ポイント  (36子コメント)

Blockbuster didn't refuse to accept. They acually developed a Netflix style Internet rental program. However, they developed it in concert with Enron and got fucked.

[–]Deto 78ポイント79ポイント  (11子コメント)

Yeah but it was pay per view instead of subscription based like Netflix. And they spent like no money advertising it. It's too bad because at the time I believe they had more deals in place with major studios than Netflix I think that they were too afraid to out-compete their brick and mortar stores and so Netflix just did it for them.

[–]digitaldeadstar 51ポイント52ポイント  (5子コメント)

Blockbuster had insane deals with studios. It was quite often that when a film was released for the home market, Blockbuster would get it a week before it was on shelves at stores. That's why they had so many "Rent it now at Blockbuster or buy it on August 5th!" type commercials. Studios were more willing to work with physical rental stores because they charge a lot for rental copies of films. I guess that's also why the physical side of Netflix still gets brand new films but streaming doesn't.

[–]trashability 7ポイント8ポイント  (4子コメント)

The US has a physical side of Netflix?!

[–]maxcitybitch 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's how Netflix started. They originally offered movies shipped straight to your mailbox before they started the streaming service. You can still get new release films that are not offered online via mail.

[–]TruthFromAnAsshole 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

They didn't advertise because it didn't really work. Enron fucked them

[–]iamclarkgriswold 28ポイント29ポイント  (17子コメント)

Being able to exchange my mailing rentals in store was enough to make me choose blockbuster over Netflix. I think I'm the only person in the world to be sad blockbuster is gone.

[–]8cr13mov 54ポイント55ポイント  (11子コメント)

You're never the only one. I miss seeing kids from school at the video store on Friday nights - you never knew who you would run into. I miss renting 2 DVDs, getting a take and bake pizza, and coming home for a long night in. You had to commit to movies back then. And when they were over, you could watch the special features and discuss the film before going to bed.

...and now I feel like an old person.

[–]unrealdonnie 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

This actually reminds me of when the Blockbuster down the street was still up where there was a Little Caesar's right next door, so on Fridays my dad and I would stop by on the way home from school, pick up one absolute shit B-movie and one well-reviewed film, and a pizza, go home and watch em. After six years of doing this the store finally closed down and since then my dad and I rarely hang out anymore.

[–]RemCogito 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

Start doing it again. sure you won't go to the store to get the movie but order some pizza and watch some movies with your dad.

[–]MightyMetricBatman 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Actually they did refuse to change, depending on your department.

Their corporate structure set it up so that the digital side was competing with physical stores with the inevitable internal insanity that resulted.

Being able to return rentals from the digital store to physical - the physical department got to charge from the budget of digital for that. And as anyone knows from corporate politics, this is all phony money, the real money is what comes from the customers. And this causes all sorts of internal political stupid.

From the outside, it looks like leveraging their physical locations for better customer convenience.

It was really those political wars and stupid internal structure that really stopped them from making the transition correctly and sunk them completely.

The corporate board never really cracked down, or knew hot to stop this petty politics as the board long stopped being entrepreneurs to petty rich people sitting on a board to collect a nice rich salary.

[–]toeofcamell 197ポイント198ポイント  (26子コメント)

Racial steering refers to the practice in which real estate brokers guide prospective home buyers towards or away from certain neighborhoods based on their race. Racial steering is often divided into two broad classes of conduct; 1.Advising customers to purchase homes in particular neighborhoods on the basis of race 2.Failing, on the basis of race, to show, or to inform buyers of homes that meet their specifications

In the United States, redlining is the practice of denying services, either directly or through selectively raising prices, to residents of certain areas based on the racial or ethnic makeups of those areas. While some of the most famous examples of redlining regard denying financial services such as banking or insurance,[2] other services such as health care [3] or even supermarkets,[4] can be denied to residents to carry out redlining.[5] The term "redlining" was coined in the late 1960s by John McKnight, a sociologist and community activist.[6] It refers to the practice of marking a red line on a map to delineate the area where banks would not invest; later the term was applied to discrimination against a particular group of people (usually by race or sex) irrespective of geography.

more fun real estate sleaze ball tactics: http://www.chicagonow.com/getting-real/2011/08/11-of-the-sleaziest-real-estate-practices/

[–]tomdarch 86ポイント87ポイント  (18子コメント)

And the end effect of this is that "white" people overall gain more as property values increase, and because "black" Americans are "steered" to weaker/marginal real estate markets, they, as a whole, don't gain wealth (or if there is some gain, it's much, much less than for "white" Americans.) Real estate and the ability to leave valuable property to your kids is a huge deal for "average" American families.

Our system of racism is largely "the death of a thousand (little) cuts." Steering a "black" family to a crappy market in order to simply close a deal is one of the much larger cuts.

[–]Skunky9x 63ポイント64ポイント  (15子コメント)

This is probably what bothers me the most.. A house is the single most expensive piece of wealth any of us will own in their lives. Skewing this away from minorities diminishes not only their short-term wealth/utility, it actually destroys the future prospects of their entire offspring. Piling these together in neighborhoods that are now labeled 'the getho' naturally causes instances of anger, dissatisfaction, etc.

[–]Natsume21 12ポイント13ポイント  (6子コメント)

This is precisely why American ghettos are seen as violent and thus feed into more racism

The cheap pricing are also near areas also includes far fewer economic opportunities to climb up the status ladder legally. Due to scarce resources, the majority of the country hating you, and absolute frustration from moving up, many of them turn to more illegal means to move up or get by.

In many early hip hop songs, they address this heavily. This isnt in just black america, the Ghettos were originally labeled as run down places Jews in Eastern Europe were placed in. Similar results occurred.

Here in Good Old America though, the middle class saw these people on tv, and maybe either out of guilt or a sense of "I don't want that happening to me, it can't happen to me." They assumed they, or those who appear like them either deserved that fate or were cursed with inferior genes, washing the middle class clean of the act to do something for them.

Replace black with poor, disabled, or homeless, and it's the same mindset.

[–]nosamiam28 20ポイント21ポイント  (5子コメント)

This is why I get so pissed off when people say, "Slavery ended hundreds of years ago. No one alive today was a slave and no one alive owned any slaves. Black people need to get over it. Look at the Irish! They were slaves (?) and they are doing just fine!" MF, what?? Yes, legal chattel slavery ended, but the effects of the racism that sustained it are still being felt for sure.

[–]stillhasmuchness 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

As an agent I get buyers all the time that openly discuss what type of neighborhoods they want to live in and what types they don't want to live in. I explain that I can only give them factual information about the properties they are viewing and cannot comment on the neighborhood. I also explain why.

I will also say that this behavior is not exclusive to caucasian races and the majority of the time it is my black clients that say they do not want to live in an all black neighborhood. In 10 years of real estate I've only had one white client that openly stated and was adamant and extremely racist about neighborhood make-up. But for everyone else it usually just boils down to crime and school ratings. No one wants to live somewhere that is violent and most people want to be sure their kids have a good education.

The best thing I can do is I direct them to the city web page and there they can look up crime data and decide for themselves about areas. Everyone has a different levels of what's ok and what's not ok and what's not ok for me might be fine for someone else. So it would be a fucked up thing for me to steer someone from a house based on my personal opinion. I don't care what color my clients are, I would never want anyone to come to harm but they are adults and have to make their own decisions.

There are a lot of times that builders come in and rehab homes or tear down old houses and build new in those neighborhoods. The first ones in are usually a great value for someone wanting to get into a home. Enough good people move in and it starts pushing the bad out, sometimes it doesn't work out as well, just would depend on the area I'm sure.

tl;dr: Giving the perspective of an agent trying not to steer even when folks ask me to.

[–]VigodaLives 147ポイント148ポイント  (12子コメント)

This American Life, in conjunction with ProPublica, explored this practice, its roots in federal government policies in the '30s, the devastating effect it had on neighborhoods, efforts by Mitt Romney's dad to stop it, how he was thwarted by Richard Nixon and the long-lasting impacts it's had to today. It's really shocking, and one of the best, most informative hours of radio you can listen to.

[–]CricketPinata 41ポイント42ポイント  (10子コメント)

Everytime I hear a story about George Romney it's about him being awesome.

[–]HBombthrow 23ポイント24ポイント  (8子コメント)

Right, how did Mitt not run on a platform of, "Hey, here's another thing my dad did..."

[–]ExtrasolarEarth 49ポイント50ポイント  (5子コメント)

His dad would have been promptly booted out of today's Republican party.

[–]ssandrigon 10ポイント11ポイント  (2子コメント)

Check out the Whistlestop podcast episode about George Romney's presidential run, he did a tour of poor neighborhoods. Also, he was born in Mexico (to Polygamist Mormons) so I'm not sure how he would have qualified for president.

[–]iamaManBearPig 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

Same way Ted Cruz is technically able to run for president. At least one parent has to be an American citizen.

[–]VCUBNFO[S] 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Cool, thanks for sharing.

[–]-7FORTY2- 50ポイント51ポイント  (8子コメント)

There's an episode of 'All In The Family' about this.

[–]wildcatsnbacon 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Howard Stern has described this happening where he grew up in Roosevelt, NY.

[–]Cr3X1eUZ 415ポイント416ポイント  (67子コメント)

Keep the Poors and the Almost Poors fighting, to distract away from the people who are actually fucking them over.

[–]Hail_Mosley 451ポイント452ポイント  (53子コメント)

The Jews.

[–]TheVegetaMonologues 205ポイント206ポイント  (26子コメント)

THE JEWS CONTROL ISRAEL! WAKE UP SHEEPLE!

[–]PunkPenguin 27ポイント28ポイント  (8子コメント)

The guy you're responding to thinks he's being serious though. Not sure he's being satirical lol

[–]Alphaetus_Prime 21ポイント22ポイント  (5子コメント)

I just checked out his comment history. Either he's serious or he's a very dedicated troll.

[–]Centaurus7 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah look at his comment history he is 100% serious.

[–]M4rkyboy 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oswald Mosley was the leader of the British Fascists. I think the dude's being serious.

[–]MisterBergstrom 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Rand Corporation, in conjunction with the saucer people, under the supervision of the reverse vampires, are forcing our parents to go to bed early, in a fiendish plot to eliminate the meal of dinner. We're through the looking glass here, people.

[–]cC2Panda 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

It wasn't 100% rhetoric. I live in Jersey City and one of my old co-workers is from West Orange. His family used to own a few Italian delis and grocers in Newark. During the Newark race riots a few of the shops were looted and destroyed. So they packed up and rebuilt a little further west. Once a substantial number of business owners moved the areas would devalue. When you don't have a bank, groceries, hardware and other basic stores to make living possible the property value drops. So everyone else cut losses and moved if they had the means.

Race riots happened in lots of cities all over and the end result tended to be the same, a loss of business and everyone but the poor moving, with the people moving last losing your most money. People were already considering the suburban dream and the chance of a losing money on your current home made the dream more attractive. The suburbs everywhere were skyrocketing in value and the dense urban areas weren't. If your current home was a potentially going to go under water and you were offered an interest free loan to move where the market was soaring wouldn't you be a fool not to move?

Newark still hasn't recovered from the race riots. Then you can look at other places like Camden where anyone with the means to move out does leaving a perpetual poverty stricken area. After a while people just accept that Newark is shitty and police in scissor lifts is normal and worse the police are understaffed in Camden so the city goes to the criminals abandoning the good people.

[–]radome9 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Divide and conquer.

[–]trexrocks8 70ポイント71ポイント  (34子コメント)

Blockbusting was most prevalent on the West Side and South Side of Chicago.

This and other tactics is why Chicago is one of the most segregated cities in America. Segregation map

[–]DrSandbags 31ポイント32ポイント  (4子コメント)

May I present to you the #1 ranked segregated city in terms of dissimilarity score from the 2010 Census, my former residence of Milwaukee, WI: http://censusscope.org/dev/sites/default/files/images/salon_mar2011/Milwaukee.png

[–]karlheiden 20ポイント21ポイント  (6子コメント)

Reminds me of Kansas City. The bottom left is Johnson County, Kansas, which is full of the affluent suburbs. The top left is Kansas City, Kansas and the right side is Kansas City, Missouri.

No legend...blue is Caucasian, green is African American, orange is Hispanic, and that small red concentration is Asian.

[–]nshaffer4 23ポイント24ポイント  (1子コメント)

My great-grandmother did something similar to this. She built and sold houses for a living. A white man, who lived on the same street, wanted to buy one of her houses for less than her asking price of $40,000, so she paid a black couple to look at the house one day. After seeing the black couple tour the house and thinking they were going to buy the house, the man suddenly had an offer higher than $40,000 to show he could pay more than the black family.

[–]wstrngnnt 26ポイント27ポイント  (6子コメント)

So you watched "King of the hill" today on cartoon network also.

[–]Reaper948 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Came here to make sure I wasn't the only one that caught this.

[–]steamboat_willy 16ポイント17ポイント  (4子コメント)

I've often wondered how you might play a chaotic neutral character...

[–]yes_its_him 37ポイント38ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks for clearing that up. I thought it referred to having an empty former video rental store in every strip mall.

[–]BUSean 147ポイント148ポイント  (29子コメント)

"This sounds terrible, and I'm glad I don't live in a time like that," he said, moving to another thread to upvote a joke about black people.

[–]MoleMcHenry 47ポイント48ポイント  (12子コメント)

I might get shit for this but this bothers me a bit about people. I look at subs like /r/BlackPeopleTwitter and feel like people are more so laughing AT black people and not with us. It's weird. It's like one second people are all about defending black people and then the next they're like "lol black people."

[–]LicenceToBill 21ポイント22ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's a difficult distinction, because whether or not something is racist often depends on the intent of the speaker, not just their words...but you don't always know their intent.

How many "white people" gifs have you seen of some white dude awkwardly dancing? I don't take any offence to those because I'm pretty sure 99.9% of the people posting them don't hate white people. I had a jewish ex and cracked plenty of jew jokes at the time but she knew that I had nothing against jews (obviously, since I was in love with one) and found the jokes funny, not offensive. So you can have jokes about race that aren't racist, but unless you are close to the person making the joke then their intent isn't always clear.

[–]Phathom 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

TIL this is still happening now, especially in Chicago. The projects were known to do this. Now they are rich white home condos!

[–]CylonbabyLiam 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Couple this with redlining, and you have systematic economic segregation!

[–]thegreatgazoo 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

It happened to my grandparents. They lived in an all white neighborhood on the north side of St Louis near 70 and McArthur. They were offered something like double for their house but liked the house so they didn't take it.

Long story short when they got to the point where they couldn't take care of the house anymore, they were one of 3 white families left. The property values had plunged and they were one of the few houses that hadn't been robbed (frankly they didn't have much to steal). They then moved close to where Michael Brown was shot, which was another poor but mostly white area at the time (mid 70s).

Even today real estate agents in St Louis only show houses on the north side to black residents and the white people who live there are running out to St Charles. My parents lived in far north county and their neighborhood had a few houses that were rented to section 8 renters and they were trashed pretty quickly, which takes down the rest of the property values. The gay couple with the nicest house was chased out because of crap written on their garage door. It basically went bad in a year or two.

[–]bold_facts 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

White flight is still a thing.

[–]blomqv 13ポイント14ポイント  (1子コメント)

And then the whole community blamed all of it on black people.

[–]mattkrueg 37ポイント38ポイント  (17子コメント)

This tactic is still used, by the way.

[–]jdub3132313 20ポイント21ポイント  (5子コメント)

Evidence? Not that I doubt you, but it would be some interesting reading.

[–]LOHare5 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sounds like a solid American capitalist story.

People are racist... how can we make money off of this?

[–]tintinreddits 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

TIL black people moving into a neighborhood is a good way to rid all of the white people of a neighborhood.

[–]cjb630 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Learned that today?

[–]is_it_fun 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

When a black family moves in somewhere, even to this day, some non-black neighbors get weirded out. Real estate agents smell blood and capitalize on it.

[–]mandiblebutt 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oak Park Illinois is a suburb just west of Chicago. Kinda fancy, home of Hemingway and Frank Lloyd Wright Studios.

Just east of Oak Park is Chicago's Austin Neighborhood. During the 50s and 60s Austin went from a white ethnic enclave to almost all African American. Oak Park did not want that to happen.

Oak Park banned real estate signs and adopted a "black a block" strategy. Literally, only one house on each block could be sold to black folks.

Oak Park calls herself desegregated to this day.

Next town west is River Forest. African Americans could not live there, period. Realtors were not allowed to show houses to black folks. Tony Accardo, the head of the Chicago Outfit, lived in River Forest.

[–]John_Barlycorn 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

When we were looking for a house about 10 years ago, we walked into a house and there was this great... I mean, really really well done... photo of the previous owners when they were young (1940/50s maybe) with the wife getting a piggy back ride on some boardwalk somewhere. It was a really impressive photo, poster size, and I stood there stairing at it, impressed for a while. Our Realtor took my pause to mean the wrong thing and said "Don't worry, they're the last Jews in the neighborhood."

Talk about cold water in your face. I just glared at him and walked out. Honestly, I don't even know how you can tell if someones Jewish just by looking at a 60yr old picture.

[–]socsa [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Holy. Fuck. ITT: reddit excuses racism.

[–]jrm2007 11ポイント12ポイント  (6子コメント)

Related to this were covenants for homeowners associations that made them promise not to rent orsell to non-Wasps or at least not to Jews in addition to Blacks and probably Asians. These were in place in La Jolla as late as the 1960s when the new UC needed to provide housing for faculty and so these rules were overturned.

The USA was not so different from nazi Germany -- a difference of degree but not kind. Different leadership in the USA could have led to a more nazi-like nation. Roth writes about this in his pretty good (what the fuck do I know, maybe great) book set in an America where Lindbergh gets elected.

I keep posting and getting shot down for expressing the idea that our treatment of Blacks in the USA made the treatment of Jews in Germany less shocking to us (to those of us who didn't already think it was a good idea) and maybe that led, no kidding, to the Holocaust of non-Aryans and others the nazis found disagreeable.

You can't do what we did to Blacks and Asians and Indians in the USA and think that has no connection to what happened during WW2. Why is that so crazy of an idea?

[–]pangelboy 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Is this the book you mentioned? It does sound like a good read.

Why is that so crazy of an idea?

I've never heard of the connection before, but it's really not that crazy of an idea to me now that you bring it up.

Read this:

So Hitler's plan was for Germany to emulate the United States, first by seizing large tracts of productive land by pushing the indigenous populations out. If those natives could not be pushed out, they were to be killed. And then slave labor was to be employed to produce the food necessary to support industrialization and militarization, just as the United States had done.

Nazi ideology embraced virulent European anti-semitism, but not originally with the intent to exterminate the Jews. Nazi planners hoped to deport European Jews to the remote island of Madagascar, or alternatively after the defeat of Stalin's Soviet Union, to push Europe's Jews east of the Ural mountains into Soviet Asia.

Britain's surprising resistance to the Nazi conquest of continental Europe meant that the Royal Navy kept control of the seas, preventing deportations to Madagascar. Russia's surprising resistance against the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union meant that deportations east of the Urals wouldn't work either.

Plan B then was to kill Europe's Jews, the greatest concentration of whom were in central Europe under German occupation, along with any other perceived obstacles to German occupation and exploitation of the conquered lands.

New scholarship supports Hitler's understanding of how the American republic came to industrialize and prosper through expulsion of indigenous people and, especially, through the institution of slavery, which is now understood to have been central to America's economic development.

As Edgar E. Baptist concludes in his 2014 analysis of American slavery "The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism", "(C)ommodification and suffering and forced labor of African-Americans is what made the United States powerful and rich." The book has been praised for taking "apart the myths that our society has created to make us more comfortable with our slave-owning past."

So Hitler's model was in fact the U.S.A.

[–]hbgk10 12ポイント13ポイント  (2子コメント)

Real estate brokers - sleazeball egomaniacs. This surprises me not at all.

[–]tomdarch 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

Always remember: "The agent is not your friend. The agent cares about only one thing: getting paid at the closing. The agent will say and do anything to get the situation to the closing. Nothing else matters. No, your agent is not different, and is not special."

[–]cyberslammer 27ポイント28ポイント  (49子コメント)

White flight era? It never ended.

[–]Cable_Car 49ポイント50ポイント  (22子コメント)

It did in my city, DC. The inverse is being seen, actually. Many black families are leaving for suburban locales like Prince George's & Montgomery county. Also consider this new brazen generation of white yuppies, who really don't give a shit about living near dodgy areas. They just really want to live in the city. Percentage of blacks in DC is declining rapidly, predicted to decrease 5-10% every census starting with 2000-2010, when the black share went from 60% to below 50%. On top of this the white population is growing steadily. Should regain majority status at some point if trends stay constant. Interesting stuff, the ebb and flow.

[–]TonyzTone 30ポイント31ポイント  (5子コメント)

That's gentrification and is basically the pendulum swinging back. In the old days, the poor were in the city slums while the rich were on rural estates. Then the rich moved to the city because it was posh and close to jobs while the poor were relegated to working shitty farm jobs. Then the rich moved out to the suburbs which at this point was basically where the farms used to be. Now the rich are flocking back to the center of the city where the service jobs are.

[–]lasyke3 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Europe is kind of like this. They tend to have more affluent central town locations with low income suburbs that are linked to the city by trains. That's the reverse of the inner city rot you see in a lot of the American rust belt.

[–]VCUBNFO[S] 16ポイント17ポイント  (11子コメント)

Also consider this new brazen generation of white yuppies, who really don't give a shit about living near dodgy areas.

I'm in Richmond. I think the same thing is happening here. I'm one of those white yuppies.

Honestly, I don't want the black people to leave. I just want more people to live in the city. I want everyone to live in the city.

[–]AKfromVA 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I live in the middle of you two and want to move back the city.

[–]TheBawlrus 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Southside used to be the nice area, now it's all about being closer to down town. Hilarious.

[–]robotjosh 13ポイント14ポイント  (6子コメント)

People underestimate how many white people would in no circumstances live somewhere that has homeless black people wandering around.

[–]King_of_Shade 25ポイント26ポイント  (2子コメント)

I wouldn't wanna live in a place where there are homeless white people wandering around either (even though I currently do).

Of course people will choose nice neighborhoods over dirty ones, that's common sense. It shouldn't be bad that affluent people choose to live in an area with no vagrants.

[–]themadxcow 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nobody wants to live around homeless anybody, because the homeless have nothing to lose. That makes them a risk to everyone. No, it is not their fault, but it is reality. It has nothing to do with their skin colour, either.

[–]Nowin 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

An old coworker of mine moved out of her neighborhood of 20 years because a black family moved in across the street. She said she wanted to go back to a "nice neighborhood".

[–]fullofwind 31ポイント32ポイント  (18子コメント)

Gentrification is what they call the reverse and you will find plenty of examples of it.

[–]nintrader 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well then, I'm certainly glad Blockbusters went out of business.

[–]RossD123 9ポイント10ポイント  (4子コメント)

Thats freaking genius. Totally morally wrong and horrible, but genius.

ahh capitalism

[–]growls 7ポイント8ポイント  (11子コメント)

Do blacks actually lower property values by just living in a neighborhood?

Very recently a black family moved in down the street and my Asian neighbor said "there goes our property values." I think he was joking but I r heard people say that before but never asked if there was really a correlation.

So, is it true? Are people still that backwards?

[–]anschelsc1 27ポイント28ポイント  (0子コメント)

Are people still that backwards?

The thing about property values--like other potentially speculative markets--is they depend not just on opinions but opinions about opinions. If you think the property values will go down soon, you'll feel under pressure to sell early before that happens, which of course makes prices lower. Likewise, potential buyers who expect prices to go down will place lower bids.

So for changing demographics to lower property values, you don't need any actual racism; just a prevailing belief that some other people are racist.

Note: I'm too lazy to look for statistics, so I don't actually know how much this still happens (and I don't trust my own anecdotal experience). Also, the fact that the effect can happen without racism existing doesn't mean racism doesn't exist.

[–]studentofsmith 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

Could be a self-fulfilling prophecy.

[–]VCUBNFO[S] 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Now it is generally more dependent on income level.