Thanks for responding. Neither of those solutions address the issue of accountability. Due to the current controversial nature of
/r/Europe, there should be some type of transparency placed on the mods. The flair, while a nice addition for notification, does not resolve this issue.
Comments on the thread made by the mod themselves have led to harassment of individual mods
That's unfortunate, but all the individuals volunteered for this position. The candidates knew that there would be a large amount of attention drawn to their actions. The initial candidate thread was a clear example of this. Furthermore, a few negative instances should not limit the ability for transparency.
in your specific case it was a matter of Google translate making a bad translation which significantly altered the title of the story you were submitting.
I understand that my submission to
/r/europe was removed due to a bad translation. The submission to europemeta was a different situation entirely. That submission was removed without warning and I was threatened of being banned for voicing my concern.
Questions about removals are of course first addressed in modmail, although we already explained to you why we removed your post, we're nice and patient people and don't mind explaining it again. But none of that explanation is then found back in your Meta post. That's very dishonest of you, to say the least, and it will get you banned next time. I'm very tired of this whole 'censorship' tone when you are the one submitting stuff you can't even properly understand.
Like I explained in my response "I had submitted the Europemeta post at the same time when I messaged mods. I wasn't too sure if the mods were going respond. You're right, it would have been disingenuous to leave the post as is, but I was going to update it after messaging the mods. If that was your concern, you should have just messaged me before removing it."