We often talk about how equality is a myth here and on the right but yes fortunately feminism WILL blow itself out. But let's not fall into the naturalistic fallacy, that feminism will fail because of human nature. I find this argument to be a little bit weak and it involves a great deal of speculation on the person making the argument. This is a general post and is not meant to attack the article.
The fallacy of things being natural or unnatural is meaningless, everything in a real sense, especially ideas, are natural. Because we are the the ones that create them. Now ideas that go against human nature may be relevant to the masses but certainly to people pushing feminism they think that what they're pushing is human nature.
After all, they're claiming now that we are like the "gentle bonobo" and that we lived in matriarchal tribal structures. If this is true (might be, various chimps are matriarchal) then truly this would be the most inferior system ever created. As an "unnatural" traditionalism went further in a few thousand years than 190,000 years of matriarchal domination (modern anthropologists believe modern humans lived for about 200,000 years).
The question should not be what is natural or whether feminism will come to end because of nature. It should be whether or not feminism is sustainable and looking at historical examples we can see this is monstrously false. Many empires including but not limited to the Ancient Greeks, Ancient Romans, and various Islamic empires (late 1100's) improved women's rights right before their collapse. Similarly America is doing the same thing, improving women's rights before their collapse. These "rights" should be in quotations because in reality they are more like massive privileges afforded by endless white-knighting.
Feminism will either be drowned due to the collapse or the feminist empire will collapse due to an outside force. In any case it's a fast and hard descent downward. A good example is like Russia, look at how profoundly anti-feminist they became after their fall. Feminism will be destroyed but only if the nation undergoes a great shock to it's own core.
One last thing, modern feminism is dependent on both the internet and the prison industrial complex. Without the internet feminism would probably be a small shell of what it once was and people would stop giving a shit. The problem for feminists now is one of constant reinforcement, they go onto the same blogs pushing them in that same tunnel vision worldview. I think we're all guilty of this but they are among the worst sufferers.
The most outrageous claim I've ever heard is feminists that are for prison abolition. At face value this is a ludicrous claim because their system of throwing any men in jail they don't like would be immediately smashed. But without the convenience and money to pay for modern jailing the prison complex would shut down. Instead feminists should ask how many large industrial sized prisons were there in the pre-industrial times. Not many at all. They simultaneously call for outrageous punishments for harassment, sex now needs consent, rape, assault while being against prisons? (Which I know is a more extreme view) This my friends, is doublethink, holding to conflicting viewpoints but holding them both equally.