An Open Letter to the Wesleyan Community from Students of Color

The following is an open letter to the Wesleyan community from a group of students of color. It appeared earlier today on The Ankh‘s Facebook page and has been published here with these students’ permission. The views reflected here are the writers’ own.
photo by Jacob Seltzer ’17
To the Wesleyan Campus Community:
To be black in an anti-black society is to be a commodity fit for liquidation, it is to be already evidenced as not befitting of life, it is to live under surveillance and always positioned as a potential threat, it is living under the conditions of imprisonment (of our senses of self, expressions, bodies, gender articulations, and sexualities).
So when we say that Black Lives Matter, we are not implying that other lives do not matter. We are reaffirming our existence in a country that continues to do everything it can to demolish and obliterate black and brown lives. By speaking out against institutional, structural, and systemic racism, by affirming Black Lives Matter, we are liberating ourselves from these systems of oppression.
We do not have the time, nor luxury, to be caught up in this smokescreen of free speech. Let us be clear: this is not an issue of your free speech. This is an issue of our voices being silenced, our communities under attack. Free speech is not a one-dimensional highway—white, cisgender, heterosexual men are not the only ones with the right to free speech.
When students of color speak our lives into existence, our speech comes under attack. When we defend our lives, we are harassing you. When we demand safety, we are attacking you. Our unapologetic voices are deranged screams; our open hands are clenched fists; our cellphones, weapons, our pigment, targets.
Centering this conversation on free speech, without the context of the voices historically censored and misrepresented, is the very manifestation of systemic and structural racism that continues to silence and murder people of color.
Institutionalized racism is found in the media and the education system at large. One of the most dangerous lies of the century is that we live in a post-racial society. Institutionalized racism is not only present at Wesleyan University—it is festering in the DNA of our coded language. The Argus is an institution whose history of devaluing people of color in our community proves that it plays a role in the perpetuation of institutionalized racism.
Further, within the microcosm of Wesleyan University—the lack of response from the administration on behalf of concerned students of color is reprehensible, inexcusable and indicative of its role in supporting institutionalized racism. The administration only publicly acted in defense of a privileged voice.
White Press has not and will not work for black and brown people. White Protest has not and will not work for black and brown people.
Freedom of speech, in its popular understanding, does not protect Black Lives Matter advocates who are trying to survive in a racist world, but instead protects the belief systems of dominant people—despite the extent of their heightened ignorance.
The debate has become whether members of our community even deserve, not only to exist on this campus, but simply to live. By focusing on the freedom of speech instead of students’ lives and ability to safely exist on this campus, you are practicing censorship and you are partaking in racism.
This is yet another moment that defines our resilience as black and brown people. We remain hopeful that this will be an opportunity for growth and a reminder that there is much work to be done to ensure that this is an inclusive campus.
Signed,
A Group of Concerned and Unapologetic Students of Color
We were unable to load Disqus. If you are a moderator please see our troubleshooting guide.
Avatar
Join the discussion…

  • in this conversation
⬇ Drag and drop your images here to upload them.
        Media preview placeholder
        Log in with
        or sign up with Disqus or pick a name
        ?

        Disqus is a discussion network

        • Disqus never moderates or censors. The rules on this community are its own.
        • Your email is safe with us. It's only used for moderation and optional notifications.
        • Don't be a jerk or do anything illegal. Everything is easier that way.
        By signing up, you agree to the Disqus Basic Rules, Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy.
        By posting, you agree to the Disqus Basic Rules, Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy.
        • Reythia a day ago
          Did you guys even READ the original article that theoretically prompted this? http://wesleyanargus.com/2015/...
          You might note the place where the author laid it out simply: "If vilification and denigration of the police force continues to be a significant portion of Black Lives Matter’s message, then I will not support the movement, I cannot support the movement. And many Americans feel the same. I should repeat, I do support many of the efforts by the more moderate activists."
          Sorry, but when BLM decides to do idiotic things like block the runners of a marathon from crossing the finish line (http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/..., they're not being responsible people speaking for their cause. They're just being bullies.
          I'm all for reducing the very real problems of institutionalized, largely-unconscious racism and police brutality. YES. But you don't do that by becoming an unruly mob who blocks innocent marathon runners, or by raising criminals up as heroes. You fix things by acting like mature, rational, impassioned adults. You work WITH those others who sympathize with you, rather than turn them against you via these childish tantrums.
            see more
            • KiteFlyer89 2 days ago
              Jesus christ kids, sometimes people have different opinions than you. The editorial you're complaining about was stupid, I agree, but the only reason to feel sympathetic to it is that this guy has absolutely every single right in the world to voice his opinion and a newspaper SHOULD be showing different points of view.
              Write a counterpoint editorial, write a blogpost, hand out pamphlets about the need for BLM, but this is the equivalent of a 6-year old's hissy fit.
                see more
                • Avatar
                  POC not POS 3 days ago
                  I'm a person of color and I'm sick of this hyperbole. You know nothing about politics. If you did, you'd understand the importance of building coalitions. Instead, what we get from you is activism for the sake of activism. A fucking performance. Fuck you and your movement.
                    see more
                    • Avatar
                      gary 4 days ago
                      "When students of color speak our lives into existence, our speech comes under attack. When we defend our lives, we are harassing you. When we demand safety, we are attacking you. Our unapologetic voices are deranged screams; our open hands are clenched fists; our cellphones, weapons, our pigment, targets."
                      Well, when I try to talk about free speech, I get called a racist.
                      This statement be well-placed in some locations, but this is Wesleyan, not the streets of Ferguson. I'm not saying institutionalized racism doesn't exist at Wesleyan, but you most certainly DO have the community's ear.
                      The question is, will the group who posted this article continue to engage in the paranoid tactics of (1) calling any disagreement w/ their position "manifested racism," (2) insisting that the entire world is against them and "doing everything it can" do obliterate their lives (see the wikipedia article on state-sponsored genocide for perspective) (3) mistaking the ever-present circulation of power (which certainly IS racist) for intentional support of racist intentionality (4) cut and dry separation between White elements of society and Black elements (isn't that also racism?). Or will this group engage the community and build a coalition that can embrace both freedom of speech and racial equality. If the two are mutually exclusive, you're going to have some problems.
                        see more
                        • Wickedwebsweunweave 4 days ago
                          "By focusing on the freedom of speech instead of students’ lives and
                          ability to safely exist on this campus, you are practicing censorship
                          and you are partaking in racism."
                          I mean....I just....I....do they really not see how insane this statement is? By focusing on FREE SPEECH we are practicing CENSORSHIP? Nobody is censoring you, that's the whole fucking point. Everybody on the left is putting his or her head in their hands because your whole argument is symbolic of a dangerous political extreme. But because WE are more thoughtful than you and understand the true concept of liberty, we defend your right to publish these asinine statements that claim the University should go out of their way to suppress opinions you find objectionable. You rail against how we suppress your voice, when every platform is surfeit with your whiny, poorly thought out arguments. The fact is that we're not suppressing your voice: we're disagreeing with it. But of course, to disagree with you must mean we're racist.
                          Fuck this so hard. Its embarrassing, it's shameful, and worst of all it harms the very community you say you want to protect.
                            see more
                            • Avatar
                              anon 4 days ago
                              please stfu -an actual student of color
                                see more
                                • johnwesley 4 days ago
                                  By handing the mainstream press something else to write about, it was almost as if you deliberately chose a tactic out of the House Republican playbook. Doubling down on your mistaken tactics by issuing an unrepentent manifesto isn't going to do you much good either. You all owe BLM and Campaign Zero an apology for setting back the movement many months, if not years. Nothing less will do.
                                    see more
                                    • NooneUno 4 days ago
                                      Just when you think that it is impossible to make Wesleyan look more ridiculous this comes out. This piece is so rife with logical fallacies an entire course could be taught from it. The authors have reason to disagree with the original opinion piece, but pulling an Ann Coulter and taking absurd positions in order to get attention solve the problems.
                                        see more
                                        • Vince Staples > NooneUno 4 days ago
                                          Ann Coulter? What is this, 2005? Also dude proofread your last sentence, your second clause ends sort of awkwardly.
                                          Also if you're gonna defend white supremacy at least do it with some semblance of competence. "Logical fallacies"? What are you even talking about? No polemicist worth their salt is gonna act like "logic" isn't a wholly subjective, historically contingent, rhetorically useless concept. Try again.
                                            see more
                                            • Avatar
                                              gary > Vince Staples 4 days ago
                                              Agree with the point that logic is historically contingent. But is it really "rhetorically useless"? What are our alternatives?
                                              Secondly, your implied position: "logic" is white supremacist. if we accept your implied position that "logic" is latently white supremacist (which is a much stronger claim than historically contingency), isn't the other implication that the argument for racial equality can't be justified on "logical" grounds?
                                              My head is spinning.
                                                see more
                                                • Wickedwebsweunweave > Vince Staples 4 days ago
                                                  By focusing on free speech, you are restricting our voices.
                                                  Yet, say we didn't publish a BLM support article because a group of students on campus rejected the movement? And then we claimed that by focusing on their right to publish, they were supporting a movement that's a "terrorist organization". By hiding behind the smoke screen of free speech, they were not protecting the white students who's lives might be threatened by black nationals. In fact, supporting the BLM support article was the same as saying that white policemen should be killed in the streets.
                                                  I don't believe any of that. But see how easy it is for extremism to thrive once you propose that supporting free speech is dangerous?
                                                    see more
                                                • Avatar
                                                  Beige person 4 days ago
                                                  How in the world do you think the Argus "works" for anyone other than those who write articles for them? You could write 2000 articles championing BLM if you so wished. Your baseless claims against the Argus do nothing more than advance your personal cause and make the group look like bullies who are attacking a group simply standing up for a basic tenet of journalism.
                                                    see more
                                                    Disqus helps you find new and interesting content, discussions and products. Some sponsors and ecommerce sites may pay us for these recommendations and links. Learn more or give us feedback.

                                                    Also on Wesleying.org

                                                    0%
                                                    10%
                                                    20%
                                                    30%
                                                    40%
                                                    50%
                                                    60%
                                                    70%
                                                    80%
                                                    90%
                                                    100%