If you really believe that the official story of 911 will come to light; that enough people will believe in 911truth that we will be able to make a successful reinvestigation of the event, then we owe it to ourselves to consider what happens when we prove it didn't happen the way they said.

Should this be the case, there will be large scale prosecutions in what would be a very large class action lawsuit naming multiple defendents. We will want to be clear whether the buck stops at the original perpetrators, or to include those people/institutions that continued to support them by covering up evidence, marketed their false reality model, or despite having knowledge of contrary and incriminating evidence continued to undermine efforts to bring criminals to justice.

We are going to need to make this decision prior to starting an international tribunal.

I believe we should start amassing a list of names of public figures, people, groups, businesses that have participated in the initial act of 9/11, as well as those transporting or recycling the steel and other evidence involved in 9/11, and those who work within the media to brainwash the public. They cannot hide behind the cloaks of 'employment', 'being part of a corporation', 'government contracts', 'the media generally' especially in the case of government wrongdoing. Hiding behind larger groups as a means to escape responsibility does not fly. Obviously, it's better to go after each individual. It's not "the police" at fault, it's "officer pike badge 322" who shot that unarmed black teenager--that kind of thing.

Maybe we should start a 911truth culpability list on the wiki?

Additionally, I personally believe those who intentionally continued the false reality model of 9/11 in the media are cupable co-conspirators, not simply "misled people who don't know science". Most culpable are scientific and standards orgs like NIST, who used not science and a false process to make the conclusion of the event of 911 fit their science instead of actually running valid simulations that discover that what happened was impossible according to given variables in the illusion. In other words, they made a highly implausible 'explanation' rather than an actual investigation.

Surely, there are also people who are not experts, but if we can prove they have and continue to willfully ignore, suppress, smear, defund, denigrate or otherwise attack in a negative way the real experts (architects, engineers, firefighters, pilots, police witnesses, expert witnesses, foremen, etc) that are trying to expose the truth, then clearly they've a set agenda of siding with the establishment making them culpable as well.

Because the argument holds, "what if you are wrong and by not listening to your experts you are giving tacit consent to high treason?" They can't respond to that other than being mentally abused into conformity to an overwhelmingly powerful authority who--in the backs of our minds--is most certainly willing and able to use violence against its own people as it was proven on 9/11.

What I am proposing is not a witch hunt, because a witch hunt uses flimsy evidence. I'm proposing a hunt hunt. Real refrences, written and video evidence.

Also, since we dont know the original perpetrators (we have an idea), we can list them, but certainly we can list those people who vanguarded the original story of 9/11 and those who actively trolled 911 truth movement.