•
•

BadEconomics Discussion Thread, 29 September 2015 (self.badeconomics)

AutoModerator[M] が 投稿 - stickied post

Welcome to the consolidated automated discussion thread. New threads will be posted every XX hours! You praxxed and we answered!

Chat about any bad (or good) economic events. Ask questions of the unpaid members. Remember to use the NP posts and whatnot.

全 4 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]HOU_Civil_EconLunch break is the opium of the masses 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

What group of one economic Study/Theory are the most obviously/consistently /r/badeconomics?

[–]HealthcareEconomist3Krugman Triggers Me 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

C21.

ducks

[–]besttrousers"Then again, I have pegged you for a Neoclassical/Austrian." 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Anything specific in mind?

The biggest problem with C21 is that people keep saying it says stuff it doesn't. It's just not relevant to income inequality in the contemporary US.

I also don't think C21 is badeconomics - yeah, th growth model is weak, but getting the American public to purchase a book that has THREE! ENTIRE! EQUATIONS! is a big step up.

[–]CatFortuneにゃんぱす! 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The final question from my series of questions earlier:

When people talk about the economic damages of piracy, how do they address the fact that many of the things pirated would not have been purchased anyway if they hadn’t been pirated? Is it still considered a loss? Is it an equal loss to someone who pirates things they would buy? How is it all figured?