Occasionally the subject of a post leaves me speechless. This is one of those posts. Dildos for 4 year old girls, marketed by a “genderqueer” woman in San Francisco named Den Kirkwood Tucker. 
It would appear this project has some affiliation with Gender Spectrum, the organization involved in public school programming to elementary school children. See for yourself below. Read the article that brought this campaign to my attention here: http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/more-than-just-undies-the-smallest-details-are-the-most-important-for-parents-of-transgender-kids/story-fnet08ui-1227539339418 
..
http://www.tranzwear.net/store.php/TranZwear/ct159601/for_parents_of_ftm_childrenteens
…
Like this:
Like Loading...
Related
September 26, 2015 at 5:41 am
“TeenyBopper packer” wow. I used to be one of those women who was all “well, I dont understand being trans, but I want to respect people’s identities cause reasons and blah,blah,blah, etc” Nope, fuck it, I do not have any respect for this female hating, lesbian hating, fucked up heteronormativity literally on steroids bullshit that would give Mengele pause that is the public face of “progressive” and “feminism” and “lgbt” and dear goddess what the fuck is going on.
September 26, 2015 at 5:47 am
This is pedo grooming.
bulletbriefs dot com??
They don’t even try to hide pederasty anymore.
September 26, 2015 at 7:06 pm
Completely agree , the sick bastards
September 26, 2015 at 5:50 am
This, I think, will achieve Peak Trans if it hits the mainstream media. This is wrong on so many levels and seriously crosses a lot of lines. It’s one of the most disturbing thing I have ever seen.
September 26, 2015 at 6:06 am
Seriously ready to puke.
September 26, 2015 at 7:12 pm
Exactly my response. Beyond disgusting. The poor targeted girls.
Can anything be more clear that the trans cult wants to erase girls and women, and is patriarchy at its extreme female-hating.
September 26, 2015 at 7:28 am
I agree, if this fails to cause peak trans* in believers, I don’t know what the fuck will!
September 26, 2015 at 8:09 am
Yes. Why would someone sit and think about this and even create models of children’s genitals for kids to wear. That “pops up”, as in, simulates a sexual reaction. Holy shit. No one (except child abusers) would think this was ok if it wasn’t for the trans lingo.
September 26, 2015 at 8:13 am
More likely the build up of a massive backlash where decent LGB (especially L) will suffer yet more by association with the perv Ts.
The mainstream media take on this is no way going to be “oh look the radfems were right all along”. Instead we’re going to see a whole pile of nastiness about the gay agenda/PC gone wild/and heaps of homophobia and anti-feminist misogyny.
Look at that article that Breitbart did, after the Zoey Tur dick-waving episode: swastika imposed on the rainbow flag. This is what we’re in for.
September 26, 2015 at 2:48 pm
yep. my thoughts exactly. we see peak trans looking at this, general public looks at this and goes, “this is what gays and lesbians are doing to our kids, this is teh gay agenda” fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck, fuck.
September 26, 2015 at 9:31 pm
It’ll be the right-wing media that runs with this. They don’t give two shits about being called transphobic and won’t be shamed into silence (as opposed to liberal media). Once everyday parents learn about this, they will lose their shit.
Remember the fights all over the country about how far strip bars had to be from schools? This will make that look like a civil discussion.
September 26, 2015 at 11:22 pm
I LOVE that “normal” feminists are worried they are going to lose any semblance of power.
September 26, 2015 at 6:09 am
I thought being a boy/girl had nothing to do with genitals? Can’t they make up their fucking minds
September 26, 2015 at 1:16 pm
Very good point.
September 26, 2015 at 9:32 pm
It’s all so Orwellian. It’s about genitals only when we say it is.
September 26, 2015 at 6:13 am
I am fucking aghast at this. When I was five, I didn’t have brothers so I barely even knew what was in boys’ pants. Why would you encourage a child to feel like their anatomy is wrong?
I hate this movement. HATE.
Thank you, Gallus, for the work you do in bringing this anti-human ideology to light.
September 26, 2015 at 6:25 am
“give a natural bulge in his pants”
when do you see a bulge in a child’s pants?? JFC this is just blatant pedophilia.
September 26, 2015 at 6:27 am
Four year old girls! Holy shit!
September 26, 2015 at 8:57 am
In another post I saw about this a “concerned mother” was worried about strangers noticing her young “son’s” lack of a bulge. I’d consider this to be a major case of who smelt it, dealt it. If someone looks closely enough to be able to tell that a fully clothed “boy” is actually a girl, then questions need to be asked about why that person was staring so intently at a child’s crotch.
September 26, 2015 at 1:59 pm
If it is just about the bulge, why don’t they just put an extra pair of socks there?
I fully support the production of fake penises for women who want to crossdress to enter the military or have a career, or become pope, or whatever.
But the only use a toddler has for a fake penis is that maybe she can convince the boys to play with her if she can pee standing up. Since sexist male toddlers are really not worth anyone’s time … not an useful product.
September 26, 2015 at 6:30 am
Thank you Bea.
September 27, 2015 at 2:07 am
I am a single mom- I have an adult son. I raised him in a very open, talk to me about anything, body positive way. I can say, I have literally never even once noticed or even considered the state my son’s ‘package’. I was squicked out even typing that. the only time he ever had anything going on that would draw attention was the occasional full of piss diaper. it simply isn’t something that there is any awareness of in a normal person.
Every time I think, this is it, this is the most insane, disgusting thing I have ever heard of- I’m wrong. they manage to top themselves. I guess it needs to be said outright – can they please leave children’s genitals out of everything? I can’t even imagine how they think this is okay
September 26, 2015 at 6:22 am
Reblogged this on Stop Trans Chauvinism.
September 26, 2015 at 6:56 am
I’m speechless. The descriptions…are so pedo. Thinking about a parent reading them and choosing one for their child makes me physically sick. Imagine a kid going through this childhood and having to recover from this level of interference. Holy. Shit.
September 26, 2015 at 7:15 am
Cuz we all know, no girl is complete without a penis.
…For the Bible tells me so…
September 26, 2015 at 7:23 am
Reblogged this on tnt666 and commented:
I wish I had time to blog, but reading others is just so much more engrossing. This may be one of the grossest capitalistic commodoties yet.
CUZ NO GIRL IS COMPLETE WITHOUT A PENIS… “so the Bible tells me so”.
September 26, 2015 at 7:39 am
Well, this is… disturbing.
I’m surprised no transactivists are crying ‘transmisogyny’ over the company’s failure to provide vagina-shaped penis holders for 4-year-old boys. Unless they recognise that it’s actually child sex abuse and simply don’t care when it happens to girls, but they don’t usually seem that self-aware (and in fact like to argue that not providing children with things like this is the abuse).
September 26, 2015 at 8:59 am
Oh, no shame for the shenis. The shame is for the vulva, vagina and sitting to pee, of course. So much that it must be completely sealed in silicone! I have to wonder how healthy it would be even for a child to have their genitals covered with airtight silicone and urine all day, for years on end. (But YOU can wash it with liquid soap and water, mom!) Not to mention, how do they make the pee go up? I’m guessing it sits quite low, like a funnel. Best to not be wearing shorts, guys, it’s hanging lower than the legs of the mannequin. And don’t these kind of look like sexually mature genitalia but smaller? I can’t remember the last time I saw a naked boy who wasn’t in diapers, so I actually have no idea. Ughhhh… The expression on my face as I’m typing this is HORRIFIED. SO WRONG!! Do trans female children even get penis dysphoria? Teens, maybe, but little girls?
They can make shit like this but they can’t make brain bleach to forget we ever saw it, now THAT’S unfair.
September 26, 2015 at 2:23 pm
Anyone who has a son knows that these are miniatures of adult genitalia. Male puberty causes a “bulge” by enlarging of the genitals, so a little kid wearing this is going to look very strange.
September 26, 2015 at 4:42 pm
My husband (a man, yes, with an actual flesh and blood natural penis) sits to pee when inside on toilets, and according to him (and what I hear from others) it’s not so unusual of a thing. Never been in the boys’ room at school so not sure if there’s super pressure to always stand or what.
Looking at the pics, the thing hanging out of the undies doesn’t look like it’s coming out of the normal Y-front of the undies like regular people at all.
It’s interesting to see this “harness” too. I can imagine a regular camping style “stand to pee” device (not made to look like a penis at all, just a funnel) being handy I suppose when it’s really cold outside and the usual dropping trow to squat isn’t fun, but I can’t imagine wearing that in your pants all day?? Regular camping ones you stuff it in your pants fly to do the deed and then remove it. But these F2T can’t do that in the bathroom without “outing themselves” obviously so they gotta wear it all day long? I can’t even imagine. Just ew.
September 27, 2015 at 4:03 pm
Adrian the underwear they sell on their site, “bullet briefs” are standard underwear that have been modified with a hole at the crotch. What you inferred from the photo is correct.
September 26, 2015 at 1:53 pm
You mean, vulva-shaped penis holders? Slightly more doable, but I don’t think it’s possible.
@prozac: Oh, I am sure they get penis dysphoria as soon as they bathe with boys and their “lack” of “equipment” gets noticed and mocked. Before that … I don’t think so.
September 26, 2015 at 8:26 am
Thank you for bringing this to our attention Gallus ! this is all so sick…why are they not arrested for pedophilia is just unbelievable
September 26, 2015 at 9:07 am
Reblogged this on oopster74 and commented:
Jesus Christ! Do some research on your topic Gallus! This isn’t a dildo, it’s what’s called a packer or packy / packie (I don’t know the exact spelling). This is not paedophillia either you idiot. This is about supply and demand. If there’s demand then there’s supply, and if there isn’t, this won’t last.
For fucks sake Gallus Mag, at least do your research before criticising something, you just look like an idiot otherwise.
September 27, 2015 at 12:45 am
You are a sick man, Sarah Davis.
September 27, 2015 at 12:54 am
Like, if you call something different words, and talk about market demand, something bad becomes something good. That’s how ethics works.
I’m actually interested to see the trans spin on this. They haven’t a hope in hell of convincing people of the wholesomeness of the thing. If they double down they’re going to alienate a lot of people who hardly knew they existed last week.
September 27, 2015 at 4:56 am
To be honest, the post’s dildo headline and packer quotes confused me too, at first.
But dildo is accurate, since it’s like a groomer for a strap-on?
It’s something much odder than a funnel, since it’s worn all day despite the obvious hygiene problems.
September 27, 2015 at 4:13 pm
to australopithecene:
You just saw the tranny spin…oopster is a male who claims tranny status.
In other words, the tranny brigade is fully onboard with the marketing of pedophilic sexualization of children…
September 27, 2015 at 4:37 pm
This is “Sarah”
I encourage any mainstream reporters following up on this story to contact Oopster/ Sarah Brown for the transgender POV.
September 27, 2015 at 9:43 am
Because as we all know there are absolutely zero packers on sale that can double as dildos, none out there whatsoever that can be made to lie flat or stick out in a way that is not at all reminiscent of one of these totally awesome and wholesome devices for little girls suffering from the terrible affliction of not being ‘girly’ enough.
And of course packers are always used for practical man-costuming purposes and no-one ever has bought and worn one for their own creepy sexual sensibilities. There’s no crossover at all between packers and dildos, that’s why you definitely won’t find packers for sale at sex toy shops.
100% guaranteed true facts, brought to you by some dude who knows that women are of course stupid and couldn’t possibly know these things.
September 27, 2015 at 9:56 am
The strap-on silicone penile prosthetic doesn’t “identify” as a dildo!
September 27, 2015 at 4:43 pm
Oopster, you are an asshole. From the momma bear blog’s comments:
oopster74 on September 27, 2015 at 3:54 pm
Gallus Mag is a shameless teller of anti-trans propaganda and lies, and can’t even leave a 4 year old child out of her petty muckspreading. You should be ashamed of your behaviour Gallus Mag!
September 27, 2015 at 4:52 pm
What a compelling argument he makes…
September 26, 2015 at 9:09 am
Any decent LGB organisation (if there any left) needs to buckle up and take an explicit stand against this. It should be made clear that adults who just want to be left alone to have consenting relationships with other adults has NOTHING to do with this circus of delusional narcissists, pervs and child abusers. The T does not belong anywhere near us, and pomo queer inc is not remotely the same as “not hetero”.
September 26, 2015 at 9:11 am
Good goddess, the additional mind-fuck trauma these girls are going to have to unwind.
September 26, 2015 at 9:13 am
I just realised hir/ze/xir last name is Tucker. Den Tucker. I hope it’s not a den of iniquities! I wonder if that’s a new name or perhaps just the hand of Fate. I’m also curious about the nature of the previous enterprise “project open hand”. Especially when is adjacent to a picture of an open hand with a child size dildo in it. Ugh.
September 26, 2015 at 9:46 am
This individual’s alternate names are tagged in the post. At least three of them are. Her business is registered to an “M. Tucker” which I suspect is a fourth alias.
September 26, 2015 at 8:06 pm
I’m wondering if it eludes to tucking one’s penis, which would be a male experience… Perhaps a wish to need to tuck, or possibly even a packer Tucker. Can’t get more genderqueer than that!
Also, boisland sounds like a gay nightclub.
September 26, 2015 at 10:15 am
Reblogged this on keeva99.
September 26, 2015 at 10:45 am
As suspected, this is pedo sex toy stuff. It says on their site that their dildos “for parents of FTM children”
(http://www.tranzwear.net/store.php/TranZwear/pd7699840/masho_stp_) are made by Tomax from Japan. Japan has a strong culture of sexualizing children, so it’s no surprise that Googling them, I found out that they’re a sex toy company and make child vagina toys that men can wank into.
WARNING gross pedophile sextoy link as proof, Gallus Mag please feel free to remove it: wwwDOTqueencatadulttoysDOTcom/pillow-hole-sakuras-camel-toe/
God I need to go rinse my eyes now…I hate men.
September 26, 2015 at 2:32 pm
This is so sick I dont EVEN know what to say. And I’m not generally the anti porn bandwagon type. HOWEVER when it comes to kids, this REALLY borders on pedophilia…teach these girls THEY CAN BE AND DO ANYTHING THEY WANT IN A FEMALE BODY!!!Accept them where theyre at..how they want to dress what sports and activities they want to pursue. These are our potential brethren, Our lineage for those of us who are BUTCH. I hated myself as a young girl..but that was because girlhood limited me…but I also hated penises I thought they were horrible and ugly still do.
The ANSWER isnt making girls wear fake penises they will never be able to pee through or so they can survive a boys locker room or bathroom. The ANSWER is eliminating gender proscriptions boxes rules and limitations altogether!
First there was the dildo loving dyke crowd in SF..and thats fine as an instrument for lovemaking..but then ceryain Butches showed me their very realistic soft packers so they could pack all the time..and I suppose that need was one step towards transitioning. Then those who transitioned to FTM wore said soft packers to appear male in more circumstances, with no plans of the devastating bottom genital surgery.
And they were of legal age. But to convince young girls they are boys and create packers that look and almost feel like real penises is not only pornographic but pedophilic, and another way to make a buck on the deep distress females of ALL ages have with their bodies..and much of it due to the one down role ALL females are forced to take on once they pop out of the womb…
The sentiment against us Lesbians and all homosexuals will turn very rapidly because of the craziness of the trans movement.
September 26, 2015 at 2:34 pm
LEAVE THE KIDS ALONE!!!!
September 26, 2015 at 3:54 pm
I want to throw up now ;-;
September 26, 2015 at 9:05 pm
Not to mention the connotations of wearing a dildo harness all the time. Can you imagine? Definitely grooming kids for SM.
If you go watch the video it linked to about a little girl they re-named “Jacob,” they talk about “his” rock collection and collection of dead bugs, but insist it has nothing to do with his preferences…then they say “he” gave away all of “his” old girl toys to his sister. So glad I didn’t grow up in this tyrranical era…I could have a rock and dead bug collection and all that meant was I was a kid.
September 27, 2015 at 5:09 am
Okay, associating bug collections with boys is INSANE.
My downstairs neighbor’s 1 niece and 2 nephews showed me the niece’s bug collection when I was taking out the trash to the alley through the backyard this summer.
You know what I said to the niece? “Oh cool, maybe you’ll be a biologist when you grow up.”
Not, “You’re a boy!”
Funny enough, her brothers kinda hated the bugs.
Let all hobbies be for all kids!
September 26, 2015 at 11:36 pm
From the same site:
http://wwwDOTqueencatadulttoysDOTcom/tubomi-masturbator/
I’m gonna need to wash my soul now…
September 26, 2015 at 1:55 pm
Wow. I’m often disgusted by the trans movem
September 26, 2015 at 2:08 pm
But…if boys can be born with vaginas, why would this trans boy feel less of a boy without a penis? The Ts have been insisting for years now that sex organs so not define gender. If Laverne Cox can have a “feminine penis,” then why can’t transfemales have masculine vaginas?
September 26, 2015 at 2:23 pm
Sorry, my reply sent by accident.
I’m often disgusted by the constant boundary violation of the trans borg, but this is spine chilling.
This is pedogrooming, and as others in the thread have stated, we can only hope that the backlash will be directed at trans only, and not the other lgb members of the group they’ve colonized and violated.
As a mother of a boy, I often wondered exactly what my son’s pediatrician was doing at his annual physical, although I never watched, as I wanted to respect his privacy. And since from a young age my son has valued his privacy, I had no real idea of how big a boys penis usually is. So I looked it up.
Here is a diagram showing Tanner stages– the tool MDS use to gauge when a kid has entered puberty. healthvermont.gov/…/tools%5CJ-1%20CARD%20Tanner%20Stages.pdf
Note how tiny the penis and scrotum are in pre adolescent males. In the US, boys enter tanner stage 2 at an average age of 9 to 10. This chart shows average penis length by age: http://www.drgreene.com/qa-articles/penis-size/
Now look at the diagrams in the article. The measurements given are intentionally inaccurate, because penis size in kids and adults is measures from the base of the pubic bone. The dildo seller is measuring the shaft only, so the numbers are smaller. If you look at the first dildo in the person’s hand you can see that it extends from the base of the thumb almost to the end of the index finger. Assuming the person’s hand is average and female, that’s over four inches. So let’s do the math: the dildo recommended for 5 to 8 year olds is 66 percent larger than the STRETCHED penis length for an 8 year old, 60 percent larger than the average stretched size of an 11 year old, and 80 percent of the average size of an adult penis. Even the teeny bopper, which appears to be 3.5 inches, not 2.5 as stated, is 60% larger than what you’d see on an actual 4 year old boy.
So even though, in the world of trans, genitals supposedly don’t matter, little girls are being told their vaginas must be hidden by a device made to resemble the genitals of someone much older, someone who is mature enough for sexual activity. Tell me the trans movement is not about adults grooming kids to not only bear the brunt of a movement centered on sexual deviancy, but to be the subjects of others deviancy.
September 26, 2015 at 2:39 pm
I notice that form and function llc, which makes one of the “kid sized” dildos on this page, is NOT selling it on etsy, their sales platform . Gee, I wonder why?
September 26, 2015 at 3:05 pm
There is not a four year old girl in the world who even remotely entertains the notion that they need to wear a fake cock. How the fuck can we stop this? I feel like I’m going insane. This is not normal. This is so wrong on so many levels.
Look at this asshole with his big grin, promising to help your ‘gender confused’ child. When I was four I didn’t even know what dicks were. Why are we sexualizing toddlers? Why does it need to ‘pop up’ when not packed? Why are trannies so obsessed with little kids?
I’m seriously ill. Again. I keep thinking peak trans is reached and it’s not.
September 27, 2015 at 2:44 pm
I think it “pops up” when there isn’t weight against it because of the nature of the material used and the casting process. The manufacturer is using dildo silicone. It’s gonna pop up because it’s shorter length means the amount of material at the end doesn’t have enough weight to make it lay down on its own. One solution to this is to basically just cast a one part “lump” that would give the appearance of male genitals under a pair of pants. Granted, it would look like a 4 year old with adult male genitals under her pants, but I am more curious why it absolutely HAD to look like separate penis and testes. Whatever I come up with it all leads back to grooming. No 4 yo girl should have a penis in her pants, prosthetic or otherwise. This shit is triggering as fuck. I’m sitting here trying to come up with any scenario in which tucking a dildo down the pants of a 4 yo girl could in any way not turn out badly. I got nuthin. Companies are making a profit off this shit and because Tranz. Inc. says so I’m supposed to see this as something progressive? What the ever loving fuck?
September 26, 2015 at 3:10 pm
I think I’ve posted this before, and apologies if I have, but…
September 26, 2015 at 3:18 pm
This is sexual abuse. This and the recent Salon piece are just beyond disgusting and into the criminal. I hope somebody is contacting the authorities for both.
September 27, 2015 at 1:45 am
Pedos now have a PC euphemism that they use to refer to themselves: minor-attracted.
September 26, 2015 at 3:56 pm
Aside from the creepy sexualization of babies aspect, this is just horribly sad. So there are parents who think that their little girls who reject feminine stereotypes should put pretend dicks in their pants so that no one knows they are really female.
I see this trend to hide a child’s femaleness as similar to race-shaming. I have a Mexican-American friend whose father is somewhat dark-skinned. Growing up, her maternal grandma (who thought of herself as being more “pure” Spanish) constantly forced her to wear light-colored tights, long sleeves, and makeup to hide the “shame” of her dark skin. My friend says that this led to a lifetime of self-hate and confusion regarding herself, her body, and her heritage, even more than most females. She is in middle age and still sadly struggles with those feelings. It is very hard to undo that kind of damage.
September 26, 2015 at 3:58 pm
It’s almost as if vulvas were characteristic of girls and penises were characteristic of boys.
September 26, 2015 at 4:15 pm
Well if you weren’t already through with transgenderism, this would be it. The product does nicely fit the genderfluid trans-aged, though. You can pick a penis sized to how old you feel that day. I’m guessing that very few parents will feel drawn to this. The concept has an intrinsic appeal to pedophiles, who like to fantasize about being children.
September 26, 2015 at 5:52 pm
Burn it with fire
September 26, 2015 at 6:23 pm
This is disgusting. Just when you think it couldn’t get more creepy, this comes along.
September 26, 2015 at 7:12 pm
Hmm…
About a week or so ago, Slate or Salon – can’t tell them apart – ran a “sympathetic” article from a pedo, and they also happen to be one of tranny cheerleaders on the net (you may remember the time they posted a dead serious op-ed proclaiming that announcing the gender of a baby at birth is twanzphobic).
We’ve also seen and heard a number of stories coming out about predatory MtTs taking advantage of minors, especially ones hanging around in toxic “queer” circles.
MtTs are also disproportionately involved in every manner of “kink”, most of which is disgusting and misogynistic but protected under the guise of “sex positivity” and other libfem “queer” mumbojumbo.
Coincidence? I think not. Perverts and deviants are riding this new wave of transgenderism not only to infiltrate and destroy female spaces but also to gradually break down the taboo around pedophilia. And most people are either too blind or scared to call them out on it because they’re obsessed with keeping their “tolerant progressive” credit or don’t want to be harassed as a bigot and “terf”. This is thanks in large part to formerly gay and lesbian groups being taken over and catering to the transgender agenda.
Groups like GLAAD and HRC as well as state and local “lgbt” organizations only listen to money and IMO the only thing that will make them wake up and start distancing themselves from the tranny movement is when the money stops coming in from donors who make their complaints known. That so-called lesbian org was forced to recall their boycott on Michfest when their members let them know they weren’t having it. I think it’s time the major gay and lesbian groups remember who they’re supposed to be working for and who actually pays their damn bills.
September 27, 2015 at 4:12 pm
It was Salon, which had no business publishing the article, and the perv author is named Todd Nickerson. He was also on Dr Drew, the biggest apologist for degenerates on television.
I was serious when I kept saying that the authorities needed to be called on the article, and the IP addresses of the sympathetic comments needed to be investigated. NO quarter should ever be given to pedophiles.
September 26, 2015 at 7:18 pm
I thought we’re all supposed to NOT CARE what’s in people’s PANTS.
September 26, 2015 at 7:26 pm
I’ve been watching and fighting the trans cult since 1971 and didn’t think anything else they did would surprise me, but there is always more. This is beyond disgusting on so many levels, like everyone here is saying.
The girls I grew up with had no idea what pricks looked like. Even those with brothers usually never saw them since working class little boys in those days were expected to be clothed and modest. When we were told in high school what penises were and did, the girls were horrified. Of course most learned to accept it (ignoring their in- love feelings for other girls) to become proper het girls so they could fit in and be considered “normal” in patriarchy.
The little girls who did not want to be forced into frilly and silly male-identified femininity certainly would not have wanted a pretend prick to wear since they didn’t even know about penises. This would have repulsed them as much as it does us now.
So then who is this marketed for? It has to be the parents. And what kind of parents would buy such a repulsive and expensive thing for their little girls to wear? Besides the girl molester pervert types, people who are hoping for their own TV series?
September 26, 2015 at 7:28 pm
I keep hoping that women will finally realize what is going on with the trans cult, but most will dutifully accept this too, won’t they?
September 26, 2015 at 7:39 pm
What the fuck is wrong with u you nasty queer
September 26, 2015 at 8:32 pm
Reblogged this on Project Keep Staring and commented:
Reblogged from the Gendertrender WordPress blog. I am going to the bathroom now to throw up –>
September 26, 2015 at 9:27 pm
All of you are taking this extremely out of context. It doesn’t take much to click a single page to see the FAQ, which directly states what these objects are and what they’re meant for. Here, I’ll make it easy for all of you and go ahead and paste what it says.
“1. What is an STP?
STP stands for “stand-to-pee.” It is a device which allows a person to urinate in a standing position.”
If you even bothered to scroll down in the FAQ, you would also notice that they are not intended for sexual play/penetration whatsoever.
Hell, all it would take is some common sense to notice that these aren’t actually dildos. Dildos aren’t flaccid penises or are purposely hollow. Quit being dumb and falling for shitty click-bait articles that are meant to fool you and get a rise out of you.
And before people start attacking me, no, I’m not defending transexuals or pedophiles. I personally believe that any person who is identifiable as such has something wrong in their brain, or is specifically raised in a household which enables people to be like that. I don’t give a shit if you think these kinds of people should be thrown in a mental hospital, but you shouldn’t be judging them for the wrong reasons.
These products are meant for female-to-male trans who are too young to get operations done. It’s as simple as that. If anything, we should be relieved that these products exist instead of them mutilating kids genitalia at a young age.
September 26, 2015 at 11:10 pm
You don’t get it. These products are a form of child abuse. Little kids should NEVER be subject to the trans propaganda and be forced by their dimwitted parents to use these.
September 26, 2015 at 11:10 pm
Who is mutilating kids genitalia at a young age? Why would I be relieved that a three or four year old child is being led to believe their body is wrong and shameful?? We understand what they are used for, thank you. Most of us probably also believe that very young girls do not come up with the idea of packing a prosthetic penis which, as pointed out above, is oversized and more sexually mature looking than a boy’s is. A lot of children don’t really think about genitalia much at all, which is as it should be. (Beyond bathroom function, learning body parts and about what is bad touching, that is)
September 27, 2015 at 2:42 am
Even if the kid is severely sex dysphoric from an early age, and not merely the gender-nonconforming type that will say things like “I want to be a boy so I can grow a mustache” or whatever (which is the sort of thing most munchausen-by-proxy parents report their ‘trans kids’ actually saying)… “my child is really transgender” is not a decision parents should be making. Ever. (Nor, for that matter, is “my child is definitely not transgender”. Like… wait and see until the kid’s old enough to decide for themselves.) And parents definitely should not be buying plastic dicks for their children to wear, or planting the idea in their childrens’ minds. That’s completely inappropriate.
September 26, 2015 at 10:00 pm
You guys are fucking sick seriously you got issues you goddammed pedofile motherfuckers leave kids out of your shit they don’t need to be forced to follow any path bit their own
September 26, 2015 at 10:18 pm
Sick Mentally derranged pedophiles. Why aren’t people file lawsuits against them? seriously, this country’s spirit has been destroyed.
September 26, 2015 at 10:19 pm
Note that the tranzwear website entry page states the site is not suitable for those under 18, and that anyone entering the site is not to provide access to those under 18. Yet the site is marketing mini adult penises for 4 year olds.
September 26, 2015 at 10:46 pm
The 4thWaveNow blog has picked up the story and has a piece that goes into detail about the original article:
http://4thwavenow.com/2015/09/26/san-francisco-company-selling-packers-for-trans-boys-ages-4-and-up/
September 26, 2015 at 10:49 pm
you are disgusting Devils.
September 26, 2015 at 11:59 pm
Thank you Buck! <3
September 27, 2015 at 2:12 am
IMO, this is just another manifestation of trans mental illness. They are driven insane because they can’t reconcile their identities with their bodies, so they flounder around trying to reconcile the discrepancy. One coping strategy is to declare genitalia irrelevant to gender, as in “Not all women have vaginas and not all men have penises.”
When that doesn’t work, a second strategy, more deranged than the first, is to exalt the vagina as a symbol of exemplary manhood:
“[R]ather than experiencing particular genitals (e.g., a “vagina”) as limiting one’s ability to self identify as a man, internet-mediated transmasculine discourse reveals the way in which genitals may be discursively resignified (e.g., as a “bonus hole”) as not only adequate, but as an aspect of exemplary manhood.” (Making Space for Trans Sexualities by Carla Pfeffer, Journal of Homosexuality April 2014)
And here we have a third approach, which is to assert not that genitals are irrelevant or that “bonus holes” are a manly trait, but that being a boy necessitates having a penis, and a “trans boy” shouldn’t be without one even at age 4. With unintended irony, the ad assures parents that the artificial latex add-on will make their child “feel more confident in his skin.”
So the “trans men” lurch from one approach to the other, contradicting themselves over and over again, in a never-ending quest to convince themselves that they are real men. But they aren’t, and they know it.
September 27, 2015 at 2:18 am
I actually thought of an earlier post you made of a guy incarcerated for child porn when I saw the ‘strapon for a child’:
https://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/back.jpg?w=480&h=251
Although, these seem to be about strapons- for four -year olds, the pedo film in his court record mentioned a ten year old girl with a strapon.
I wondered who made strapons that small, and if they are aware where something like this is likely to end up.
:(
September 27, 2015 at 2:26 am
https://gendertrender.wordpress.com/2014/08/22/laverne-cox-launches-media-campaign-in-support-of-transwoman-synthia-china-blast-convicted-for-the-rape-murder-and-abuse-of-the-corpse-of-thirteen-year-old-ebony-nicole-williams/
[this post]
September 27, 2015 at 2:31 am
This is just beyond. No parent should be this preoccupied with their preschooler’s genitals.
September 27, 2015 at 3:04 am
“Den Kirkwood Tucker” penis envy is showing. What a sick bitch. Hope this is picked up by the mainstream media & she gets torn to shreds.
September 27, 2015 at 3:55 am
Yeah…so, I went to their website and… oh shit! They have them with veins! Dafuq! Little boys don’t have veiny penises! (At least the ones whose diapers I’ve changed)
September 27, 2015 at 11:22 am
There are a lot of red flags here:
I baby-sat all through my teen years and changed diapers too: young males, do not have distended scrotum’s until their mature adult years.
The strap-ons and dildos [in child-size] they are selling are modeled after mature adult male genitalia.
The dildo with the suction cup is kind of puzzling, because,- this is sold for adults: that suction cup attaches to the female genitalia and is stimulating, or it can be attached to a flat surface for ‘self- use’. Yes , I took a look- This is an adult sex toy. To wear it, is to use it as a sex toy.
September 27, 2015 at 2:43 pm
This is a ridiculous, horrible product.
Why is the penis so girthy ?I haven’t spent much time looking at young boy’s penises (why would I unless I was a urologist or pediatrician?) but that thing in the photo with the hand is as fat as an average MAN’S flaccid penis. Why, why, why ?
September 27, 2015 at 3:57 pm
Yes. These are absolutely models of adult male genitals. Little boys genitals do NOT look like this.
This is just sinister, ignorant or both.
September 27, 2015 at 9:58 am
People, we are talking about developmental stages where the kid is working out the difference between fantasy and reality, here. I can remember spending a great deal of time as a small child being the Incredible Hulk, Godzilla, a T. rex, and a dragon. And I had difficulty for a long time realizing that only one of those beings had ever actually existed.
The very fact that these are marketed to 4-8 year old children is disturbing in that this shows that adults are actively interfering with the process of sorting out “what I want” from “what is real” and not by simply reminding the kid of inconvenient realities. (I was also at one point convinced that if I could just make some party invitations, my mom would be happy to throw a party for my kindergarten class, just because I wanted some punch and cake. It didn’t end well.) I’m absolutely certain that my stomping around the house growling got very tedious for adults long before it lost fascination for me. I’m so happy that my mom’s reaction was on the level of “Even dragons have to carry their dishes to the sink, and then you should go next door and see if any knights want to play with a dragon over there.”
Anyone suggesting that my interest in all things big and stompy, my tendency to dig in the backyard, my disdain for dresses I couldn’t run or play in the mud in meant that I was not a girl would have gotten short shrift. Anyone further suggesting that I ought to even see, never mind wear, plastic male genetalia would have been having some very uncomfortable conversations with the cops.
September 27, 2015 at 12:31 pm
This is kind of strange. The reporter that authored the original story which uncritically reported the pediatric dildos is Ginger Gorman. Ginger famously authored an article in 2010 that profiled two pedophiles who posed as a gay couple and purchased a Russian baby to rape. At their trial, video showed the men performing sex acts with the child starting at two weeks old. They toured the world for years selling the baby to other pedophile male rapists before their final arrest in 2011, a year after Gorman ran her piece on ABC News Australia.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/2-convicted-adopted-son-porn-article-1.1385895
Ginger Gorman’s profile served as an apologia for the men prior to their arrest. In her article she framed the investigation of the men as anti-gay discrimination.
I had a hard time finding a copy of Ginger Gorman’s original article so I am going to archive it here.
——————————————————-
[start]
Headline: Two dads are better than one
Date: 14 July, 2010 5:04PM AEST
Author: Ginger Gorman
A shiny child’s bike lies on its side on the front lawn of an immaculate garden.
Around the back gay dads Pete and Mark chase their son’s pet chickens around, trying to catch them.
Drake, 5, exclaims that the little birds are too fast for him.
It’s a happy, relaxed family scene. But it wasn’t an easy road to get there. After many hurdles Drake was born by surrogacy in Russia.
“We decided that we would have a child, that it was time for us to have a family. We wanted to experience the joys of fatherhood and we started our surrogacy over in the United States back in 2002,” Pete said.
At the time, Pete and Mark were living and working in the US.
“Surrogacy rules and laws are much easier in the United States,” Mark said.
While not everybody was comfortable with the idea of surrogacy, Mark said the couple felt their options were limited.
“We knew that there were certainly plenty of women willing to do it so if it OK with them, then I guess it was OK with us,” he said.
Mark and Pete used the internet to find prospective mothers for the child they longed to have. Apart from the woman’s health, Pete said one of the big concerns was how genuine the candidates were.
“We have heard about a lot of scams and certain people who represent themselves as so-called surrogate mothers who are really out there just to make money,” he said.
Pete said the couple also wanted to make sure that any woman they employed as a surrogate fully understood the commitment she was making.
There was also the issue of whether the mother would actually give up her baby, Mark added.
After many failed attempts in the US, the cost was becoming prohibitive. The pair decided to try Russia as cheaper alternative.
That decision presented its own problems. Language was the main one. The couple took on a private Russian tutor and Pete gave up his job in Australia to oversee the process.
“We were very dedicated to making this work….we decided that at some point we didn’t have a budget. Our budget was anything that we had earned, anything that we had saved, anything that we could borrow to make this happen,” Pete said.
In the end Pete said they found a woman who they ‘clicked with personality-wise’.
“She was very quiet. She didn’t have a lot of demands or conditions that some of the other woman that we had met had. She seemed like somebody we could work with,” he said.
At the first attempt, Drake was conceived via artificial insemination using Mark’s sperm.
When asked why it was Mark’s sperm and not Pete’s, Mark laughed.
“A flip of the coin I think,” he said.
During the pregnancy the couple stayed in limited contact with the mother via a translator. Mostly they were in touch just when there were practical things to care of such as visiting a doctor or getting an ultrasound.
“We made it clear to her that we wanted her to take vitamins, that we wanted her to eat well. We provided the money to do that and we just had to hope that she would do it,” Mark said.
Neither man was at Drake’s birth because they felt it was important to protect the mother’s privacy.
When their son was five days old, Mark and Pete were handed their child. To their surprise, Drake’s mother gave them the baby and walked away.
“I think she had resigned herself to this much earlier on and was trying not to let emotions get in the way,” Mark said.
In fact, it wasn’t the mother who got in the way of Drake coming back to Australia with his two Dads. What followed was two and a half years of bureaucracy before the child received permanent Australian residency and another year before he got citizenship.
On arrival in Australia customs quizzed Mark and Pete for hours. Police were also sent around to their house on a Sunday morning to investigate.
“When people see two guys together, you know it’s like, ‘Where’s his mother?’ We’ve had a lot of people ask that,” Pete said.
“I think that even if one of us was a woman, we wouldn’t have had the same suspicions and problems that we went through.”
Thinking back to the police visit, Pete said the police seemed to want reassurance that the situation was ‘right’.
They checked if the couple had equipment to raise a child like a bed, clothes and bottles.
Mark said he’s sure that they were under suspicion of paedophilia. But despite the difficulties, he said the couple would do it again with no hesitation.
“We’re a family just like any other family,” he said with pride.
——————————
[end]
September 27, 2015 at 12:42 pm
http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/being-a-paedophile-is-not-a-choice-why-a-lack-of-treatment-for-paedophilia-is-wrong/story-fniym874-1227390016310
September 27, 2015 at 12:57 pm
“Virtuous Pedophiles” ? What? Ginger Gorman published this in June?
September 27, 2015 at 12:52 pm
Gorman attributed criticism of her reporting, namely her failure to fact-check the pedophilia accusations- to the homophobia of her critics.
“Some of the hateful tweets and blog posts have questioned my journalistic integrity and accused me of assisting these paedophiles. My story went to air in July 2010. It was not until August 2011 that Newton and Truong came to the attention of New Zealand police. Until now, neither Newton or Truong had prior convictions. Unless you frequented paedophilic chat rooms online, there was no way to know that Newton and Truong weren’t the pair of loving dads they presented themselves as.
When Caro Meldrum-Hanna’s report on this story went to air on ABC TV’s 730 program on Tuesday July 2, a friend of mine in Melbourne sent me a text message. “Wow. They look so normal”, he wrote of Newton and Truong. And that’s the uncomfortable truth about a case like this: hateful crimes can be done by people who look just like you and me.
For me, there is another truth to be salvaged from this quagmire. If I went back to June 2010 and I was faced with the same situation, would I do anything differently?
The answer is no, I wouldn’t.”
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-07-10/gorman-second-thoughts/4809582
————–
“Unless you frequented paedophilic chat rooms online, there was no way to know that Newton and Truong weren’t the pair of loving dads they presented themselves as.”
Except that the men reported that they were under active investigation for pedophilia to Gorman. She cited the investigation in her piece. Wtf.
September 27, 2015 at 1:46 pm
What the hell? Wtf? Hope you guys get arrested! This is pure pedophilia! Sick and twisted!
September 27, 2015 at 2:00 pm
This is absolutely disgusting.
September 27, 2015 at 2:00 pm
[…] Baby’s First Dildo -courtesy of the Transgender Movement | GenderTrender […]
September 27, 2015 at 2:04 pm
what is wrong with nowadays society, they’re children… They don’t think nor realize abput their sexuality untul puberty.
in order to this, i can inmediayely relate it to pedo men… I mean, WHAT THE FUCK???
September 27, 2015 at 2:39 pm
Why would any young girl want a penis
September 27, 2015 at 2:45 pm
And this is yet another piece of evidence for why i have believed that the “Trans” movement is VOMIT INDUCING filth.
September 27, 2015 at 3:50 pm
Absolutely perverse. Just perverse.
I am sad that that site owner and so many of the people promoting and lauding this are female. : (
Also, I have to loudly agree with this commenter:
“Why would any young girl want a penis?”
Indeed. They want to play with trucks or climb trees or collect bugs; as a consequence of their improper desires, they will be made to wear a strap-on or suction cup dildo.
Disgusting, child abuse, perverse, damnable.
September 27, 2015 at 4:11 pm
Shits’ fucked up…
September 27, 2015 at 4:45 pm
almost all of you dont have any idea of what this is all about. like if a penis doesnt work for anything else than sex, is for peeing! as a transman i would had been so happy if i have had the opportunity to transition in an early age and peeing in a urinal like any other boy, all you say its a “female hating” thing but dont you think its a “male hating” thing to think than anyone with a penis only thinks in sex, flesh or plastic, even with a plastic penis i wouldnt think in sex more than the usual. making a boy use this against his will obviously its wrong, but if somebody goes to back in time and ask if i wanted this i would have say absolutely yes. i used to put some toilet paper in my pants, not for sexual arousal or anything similar, just like an anguish palliative for the missing thing, all this subconsciously. not every trans in the male shade needs or wants something like those, and are ok with their bodies… but some of us dont, and its not like i hate my body or doesnt accept it but i need something there because my brain says it should be there. and btw this web store is old, the kid packers where out of stock but is not a new thing.
September 27, 2015 at 4:56 pm
“..the kid packers where out of stock but is not a new thing.”
Did you attempt to purchase a “kid packer”?
Can you show us any other sites selling “kid packers”?
“..if a penis doesnt work for anything else than sex, is for peeing!”
In what way does a “kid packer” assist with urination?
How old are you?