Picture a rich kid driving around in a top-tier BMW, snorting molly off a cheerleaders tits, with both middle fingers raised in the air toward his parents. He would be dog shit without them, but that doesn't matter very much, because he's not. He hates them because he can- after all, why doesn't he have two BMWs?
This rich kid has a lot in common with your modern Progressive (aka, Feminist, aka SJW- it's all the same), only the modern Progressive is sitting on a pile of infinite corpses, holding an iPhone and tweeting about the stench.
The modern Progressive and the rich kid only understand the result of struggle, they have no mind to think about the hardship; he knows he's holding an iPhone, but the prior thousand years that it took to end up in a world where an iPhone can be produced is boring and irrelevant. The Progressive believes that the finished product- the iPhone, or more broadly, the modern world- would have been the result of any methodology used... and thus, the old ways, the traditional methodology, is unsightly and archaic.
The initial fallacy of the Progressive is that the modern world was inevitable.
Progressives misunderstand and exploit what was built before them; they nitpick the methodology. They are deconstructionists, they are destructive; they don’t need to build, they only inherit. The Progressive believes in a fatalist destiny; that the successes of the human race were an inevitability; the more unsightly portions of the former methodology were hateful and unnecessary. The Progressive believes that traditional values existed only to oppress; they were for those living at a time of ignorant superstition and embarrassing naivety; they were uneducated; they are to be pitied.
The Progressive is superior.
Stanley Kubrick's "2001: A Space Odyssey" was made at the tail-end of the 1960's- a decade characterized by optimistic spirits fueled by Progressive victory. Thematically, 2001 is about Progressivism:
Kubrick’s stunning “2001: A Space Odyssey,” made at the tail-end of the 1960s, carries with it a presumption that is often taken for granted: the evolution of human nature is possible to guide, and can be commanded at will. While Kubrick is correct in the assertion that Western culture has had its share of monolithic moments, I can quite clearly imagine a shrieking monolith standing at the gates of the All Saints’ Church, this assertion is inseparably tied to the idea that these moments were architectured by an inherent intellectual superiority and are of unquestionable morality.
The 1960s were a decade that Feminists truly won.
No one knew what the new landscape would look like, or what the future would bring, after casting out the social contract- that men and women would marry young and build a family together. Reliable birth control meant that female sexuality had no consequence. It was proposed at the time that this would engender a mutually beneficial Male Sexual Utopia; think of this like a never-ending Woodstock festival where sex was easy and free.
You see, for men to go along with this, they had to bite on the line that men and women were fully equal- that women had only kept their legs closed in the 50s because of unmarried pregnancy fear. If men were to believe that women were their equal, and men understand that they'd be willing to fuck 80% of women, why wouldn't women feel the same way about them?
Only it didn't work out that way in the long run; it only ended up excluding an increasing majority of men from the dating game.
A strong civilization relies on men who have a reason to want a prosperous future beyond their lifetime. An unmarried, involuntarily celibate man has no stake in the future- he will grab at and exploit whatever he can without thought of a future world without him. Traditional methodology wasn't ignorant or childish- it ensured that he would be married, with a family, and a reason to work himself to death for a future that he will never live to see.
The Progressive sits on his mountain of corpses, holding his iPhone, and thinking that it can only get better once we stop criticizing women on the Internet, once masculinity is dead, once white people are extinct... and that it would have always been this way... that the modern world was always destined for greatness, so lets destroy all the different things that made it great.
READ THE FULL BLOG: "2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) and the Nature of Evolution"
[–]fundude12 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]Endorsed ContributorLastRevision[S] 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]fundude12 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]1oldredder 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]fundude12 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Dravous 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Dangerestdrag -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]themanwhosaid 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]fundude12 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]themanwhosaid 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]fundude12 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]themanwhosaid 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]iLLprincipLeS 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]1moodyprism 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (22子コメント)
[–]Piroko 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]lycanthr0py 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]Piroko 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]lycanthr0py 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Piroko 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]lycanthr0py -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Piroko 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]lycanthr0py -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Piroko 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]2 Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Piroko 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]2 Endorsed Contributorvengefully_yours 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Piroko 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]larrythetomato 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Ladd_MaccAodh 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]sir_wankalot_here 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RedPharaohRising 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Freddy_Fedora 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]sir_wankalot_here 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]themanwhosaid -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[+]I_Smoke_Crack_Daily スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]mugatucrazypills 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]2Red_August 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]1oldredder 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)