use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
134 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Sports Teams:
Nearby Communities:
We love you guys. Try not to repost! We have a fairly good archive - search it before submitting. Soon to come: the most informative threads in /r/houston.
Updated Gaslamp door policy (imgur.com)
ejwolberwoodClear Lake が 9時間前 投稿
[–]QuickStopRandal 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
I get it!
[–]weezleMontrose 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
I, for one, appreciate diversity in the establishments that I frequent. Yay Houston, diversity++.
[–]McHardism 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 5時間前 (1子コメント)
I guess I can understand why non-Americans might put the "$" after a number, but I get the feeling that a lot of Americans on reddit make this mistake. How could they not know by now?
[–]QuantumBear 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
Because it's not that important
[–]SmilingDaemon 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
Hah!
[–]mcbordes 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2時間前 (2子コメント)
I'm new to Houston and had no idea this was a thing. I did find it weird the one time I went they tried to charge a cover I said fuck that, every other bar doesn't and tried to walk off until the bouncer told me I didn't have to pay it. Certainly makes sense that this is going on. I'm a white guy, by the way.
[–]sean_emery09 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
That's how bars try to make extra money. They lose if you walk so why not help you out and let you in free.
[–]mcbordes 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
There was a line and I'm a guy. That shit doesn't just happen.
[+]caffeineTX スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14ポイント-13ポイント-12ポイント 8時間前 (36子コメント)
let them do this if they want to. there are better bars to go to, if they don't want everyone's business they don't deserve to have yours if you disagree with them.
[–]Reeko_HtownHobby 26ポイント27ポイント28ポイント 8時間前 (32子コメント)
Discrimination is illegal so no, don't let them do this if they want to.
[–]caffeineTX 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 8時間前 (10子コメント)
they have the right to refuse service. $20 is simply their go away we dont want you at our bar price tag
their reputation is garbage because of their discrimination and the bar is probably going under as a result of it anyways.
[–]_soangry_ 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント 7時間前 (9子コメント)
they don't have the right to refuse service based on all the shit listed in the civil rights act of 1964, though. They can refuse service based on clothing, however, since that's not in the law. That's why people are talking about this, because clubs discriminate based on dress all the time and it's fine and legal.
[+]caffeineTX スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント 7時間前 (8子コメント)
regardless my point is let them be pricks and go broke trying to keep the club afloat. its a giant karma train that's about to hit them.
[–]PiousAugustus 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 7時間前 (6子コメント)
Although I don't necessarily agree, your comment reminded me of something I read last night on Facebook that made me think:
"Am I the only one that doesn't mind if this place stays open? Look, if douchey dudes and pretentious chicks need a place to go buy overpriced drinks, by all means, let there be Gaslamp. I won't go there. I won't support them. But it also means that all those people will be in the same place and I'll never have to deal with them."
What they're doing is fucked up, but I do like the idea of keeping all the asshole customers and owners out of the bars that I actually like.
[–]poptamalePearland 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 7時間前 (4子コメント)
It also means that other bars can open and do that as well, and we just look the other way while they openly discriminate. I've said it before and I'll say it again, a blind eye is not a solution.
[–]vetworker24 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
Amen sista!!!
[–]Tiltboy -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 3時間前 (2子コメント)
And? So what? So what if someone wants to discriminate in their place of business? If you don't like it, go elsewhere. Open your own bar. Boycott and protest but that's not enough for you.
You want to see them PUNISHED
You know, just like when the white folks passed Jim Crow laws and the supreme court upheld it. Their morality said minorities were beneath them so they passed a law enforcing it.
Youre no different. Youre just the other side of the coin
"Yea but my morality is good!" Says who? Says you? Says the majority? Who gives a shit? Not me.
Gaslamp isn't hurting anyone. They might hurt your feelings but that should never be illegal.
Christians passed DOMA because their morality said homosexuals were beneath them.
Youre no different. Youre just the other side of the coin.
Prostitution should be legal, you're a consenting adult who should be able to sleep with whoever they want, whenever they want, for whatever reason they want.
Who are you to say otherwise? Yea, some people will take advantage but that's the price of freedom. Some people do abuse their rights and as such should be punished according to the law
Drug use should be legal. If someone wants to grow a plant and smoke it or grow an opium plant and shoot it who are you to say otherwise? Who are you to criminalize that just because YOU wouldn't/don't do that?
You don't have the right to criminalize these things.
Racism sucks. Discrimination sucks but as long as they aren't lynching sometime or a government official(looking at you Kim Davis) then so what?'
If Kim Davis was a baker refusing to make a cake Id be defending her ignorant, bigoted and backwaters position till the cows came home but she's not. She's an official of the public and as such MUST SERVE THE PUBLIC because the public elected her, pays her salary DIRECTLY and she took and as such she MUST operate for ALL of the public
If she was a baker, you could fuck off.
Stop. Stop. Stop. Stop thinking government is a nanny to protect you from hurt feelings. Stop thinking government exists to impose your morality on others.
[–]poptamalePearland 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 3時間前 (1子コメント)
So you're saying we aren't gonna see eye to eye on this
[–]Tiltboy -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 2時間前* (0子コメント)
Probably not but I'm open to hearing your argument against.
I take this matter very, very seriously and have evolved quite a bit since my youth in which I was a firm believer in anti discrimination law.
One day however, I stumbled upon the preamble to the bill of rights which stated that the entire point of the BoR and the constitution was to limit the federal government in all matters and too protect the rights of the individual above all else. No matter, what.
Then we passed an amendment that made the bill of rights apply to the states as well as the federal government which limits a state government involvement in all matters and too protect the rights of the individual.
When we are discussing discrimination in this case however we must prove that the rights if the victims were infringed by this door policy.
Were they denied entry? No.
Were they CHARGED? Yes.
Now. Do you have the right to not be charged? "Yes"? Where is this right found?
Do you have the right to not be offended that the white people got in free? No.
The thing is, no ACTUAL rights were infringed upon.
Does a Christian have the right to pass a law banning abortion or gay marriage? No, they don't.
Likewise we don't have the right to pass a law banning this. It is really that simple.
Just imagine what America would be if people just took their rights seriously and didn't use the government as their moral sword...man. America would be a progressive utopia where we actually were the freest people in the land.
Our government wouldn't be able to spy on us "in the name of national security" and they wouldn't be able to randomly stop you to see if you were drunk driving or an illegal immigrant.
Homosexuals would've always had equal rights.
The drug war never would've happened.
Man....just think about it.
California could be a socialist paradise and Alabama could be a conservative heaven...
Oh well. Better luck next time America lol
[–]Libertarian_Bro 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
But the douchey guys and pretentious girls might meet each other and breed. That's how you get kardashians. Do you want to get more kardashians?
[–]_soangry_ 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
I'd prefer that the law be enforced.
[–]lajdslkasflkasdflkas 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 8時間前 (1子コメント)
Only at the federal level since HERO got overturned. The city can't do much about this.
[–]Tiltboy 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
The federal level covers all levels though.
They are in fact violating federal law with this door policy. Specifically, the civil rights act of 64.
[–]Tiltboy -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 3時間前 (18子コメント)
It shouldn't be. If a bar wants to have a ladies night Monday, Mexican night Tuesday, African night Wednesday, Japanese Thursday, German night Friday, Portuguese night Saturday and then have no Asians on Sunday, WHO GIVES A FUCK?
Christ man. Its not a public university and its not 1950. You can go elsewhere. You can open your own bar. You can protest and boycott but this shouldn't be illegal.
If a fucking baker doesn't want to bake you a cake, for whatever reason he wants, WHO CARES? "I don't like your shoes go away" and "i don't like your face go away" are no different.
Its a private business operating as they see fit. Racist people get together and buy over priced and under poured drinks and you want SO BADLY to be a part of that?
You just want them punished for having a morality that differs from you. In a free society, people are free to operate their businesses however they please and as long as they aren't infringing on your rights, so be it.
You don't have the right to force people into a contract with someone they do not wish to enter it with. No one has the right to force someone to sell them a coke.
[–]Nolat 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 3時間前 (8子コメント)
damn son. so you're saying it's perfectly ok for private businesses to discriminate on racial lines?
I disagree. I think allowing that can result in so much more damage than just 'Mexican night Mondays' and hurt egos. other types of businesses operating on racial lines can really fuck things up...what happens if the prevailing morality in an area is 'fuck X group of people, let's run them out of town?' cuz isn't that one of the main reasons this was brought up in the first place.. Yeah it's not 1950, but you'll be able to find people who are still stuck there.
[+]Tiltboy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14ポイント-13ポイント-12ポイント 3時間前 (7子コメント)
Absolutely. Its a PRIVATE business. What is the difference if they turned you away for skin color or political party affiliation or shoe choice or they just thought you were ugly?
WHO CARES? It's their business. You don't get to force them to do business with you.
You just want them punished. You don't like how they operate and it hurts your feelings so you think you have the right to shut them down.
Nope, sorry.
I disagree.
Luckily this is America and you are free to disagree. You just aren't free to criminalize the differing opinion.
I think allowing that can result in so much more damage than just 'Mexican night Mondays' and hurt egos.
How so?
other types of businesses operating on racial lines can really fuck things up...
Such as?
what happens if the prevailing morality in an area is 'fuck X group of people, let's run them out of town?'
That would be terrible but are they infringing on anyone's rights? Let's say want black people gone right?
All government agencies would have to operate for them. All grocery stores, all schools all avenues of housing etc etc
You might be able to find a small town today with no minorities if you go to the right areas and so what? They have the right to live as they please.
cuz isn't that one of the main reasons this was brought up in the first place.. Yeah it's not 1950, but you'll be able to find people who are still stuck there.
I imagine there are many reasons why it was brought up and the intentions are good, no doubt but people are, rather should be, free to operate as they see fit.
No that doesn't mean they can serve toxic food. That infringes on the rights of their customers.
You'll be able to find people to abuse any freedom they have, doesn't mean we should remove that freedom entirely.
The war on drugs is a perfect example of the devastation that mentality can cause and unfortunately, however good natured and well intended, it's the same mentality as this.
I AGREE discrimination is disgusting and horrible. I just don't have the right to punish anyone for disagreeing with me.
[–]JAT621Jersey Village 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2時間前 (3子コメント)
I was born with my skin color not with my political affiliation or shoe choice. That's.. the difference..
[+]Tiltboy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント 2時間前 (2子コメント)
And? So you think if you change your shoes you should have a right to make them serve you?
Its trivial and nonsensical. Who cares if you were born with your skin color? Still doesn't give you the right to force someone to sell you a coke.
[–]JAT621Jersey Village 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (1子コメント)
Clearly skin color matters to the bouncers/owners of this bar. If it was so "nonsensical" then everyone would be allowed into the club at the same price. And you're using the word "force" as if I'm the oppressor in the scenario. We live in a country that has laws in place against discrimination. Rather than telling me to "go to another bar" why doesn't the owner of the bar run a business "in another country"?
[–]Tiltboy -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Clearly skin color matters to the bouncers/owners of this bar.
Well yea, its they bar. lol just like if they found you ugly or didn't like your shoes. What does it matter to them? It's their bar.
If it was so "nonsensical" then everyone would be allowed into the club at the same price.
No sir. They own the bar. You just want to go play there. You want to use their toys and think it's unfair that someone else gets to play at a different price if at all.
And you're using the word "force" as if I'm the oppressor in the scenario.
Well, you are. You are trying to FORCE them to serve you. You want a law that FORCES them to serve you. You are the oppressor...
We live in a country that has laws in place against discrimination.
The law is force sir. That's why police are allowed to beat you but you aren't allowed to beat someone.
Government is legalized and monopolized force. That's WHY it exists.
We SHOULD NOT have anti discrimination law in private business if we are striving for a free society.
Rather than telling me to "go to another bar" why doesn't the owner of the bar run a business "in another country"?
Because you don't have the right to FORCE them out of the country because you don't like their behavior.
Rather thab telling me to just not attend the wedding, why dont the homosexuals just go get married in another country.
See how your mentality is toxic?
Let's try this. what makes you think you have the right to force someone to sell you a coke anyway?
If I have a coke and I list it for sale do I have the right to choose whoever I want to sell it to? Why or why not?
[–]SlofutMontrose 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 3時間前 (2子コメント)
That don't wash son.......communities and municipalities have rules you don't like them, put your business somewhere else. Gaslight knows the rules, that's why they tried to sidestep the issue with a "cover charge".
[–]Houstonredditistrash -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
Id like to see you actually respond to his points rather than just saying "That dont wash son".
[–]Tiltboy -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
That don't wash son.......communities and municipalities have rules you don't like them, put your business somewhere else.
Communities and municipalities can have all the rules they want, as long as they don't infringe on constitutionally protected rights.
A community and municipality cannot pass a law like, IDK Jim Crow for example and likewise, cannot pass one that infringes on a private businesses right to operate as they please AS LONG AS they don't infringe on the rights of others.
Thank God we live in America. Its just too bad Christians like you think government exists to enforce their bible morality. It don't. Never has and never will BUT just like in 1950 with Jim crow law you have the public on your side and as such you are more than willing to swing that moral sword.
Do you not see a problem with that? Morality is subjective, that's the problem.
Gaslight knows the rules, that's why they tried to sidestep the issue with a "cover charge".
Yea because they have to tip toe around SJWs who think they have right to not be offended.
Its a toxic mentality that brings you the drug war, DOMA, Jim Crow etc etc
[–]JAT621Jersey Village 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2時間前 (5子コメント)
But, this bar doesn't want to have any of those theme nights. They essentially only want white people. You haven't learned from history much have you? Of course we can go somewhere else and they might lose business. But, it's the principal of the matter. Let's say you allow this business to discriminate against non-whites on the principal that they're just going to lose business anyway. But, wait, they actually don't go out of business. Then, let's say, other businesses begin doing the same. Next thing you know, you have numerous of businesses that are allowed to discriminate because "they might lose business".
[–]Houstonredditistrash -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 2時間前 (1子コメント)
YOU havent learned much from history considering there are no WHITES ONLY clubs around today. Just whites (& blacks with $20) only clubs.
[–]JAT621Jersey Village 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
Actually, the fact that there aren't any current white only clubs doesn't have anything to do with history as much as it does with the present. Anyway, I never said there were white only clubs. I was giving you historical context to show that allowing discrimination for one business could theoretically allow every single business in American to discriminate.
[+]Tiltboy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント 2時間前 (2子コメント)
But, this bar doesn't want to have any of those theme nights.
It doesn't matter what they want to do. They should be allowed to do it if it doesn't infringe on your rights. If they wanted ONLY Mexicans or white people it would be no different.
That's the point.
They essentially only want white people.
And? They should be able to do so.
You haven't learned from history much have you?
Excuse me? IIIII haven't learned from history? Your using government to impose your set of morals on others, just like the racists did with Jim Crow and the Christians did with DOMA and you have the audacity to claim IIIIII didn't learn from history?
Wow...wowza wowza. Alright, continue..
Of course we can go somewhere else and they might lose business.
They will.
But, it's the principal of the matter.
I know it is. You want them punished. Your feelings are hurt.
Let's say you allow this business to discriminate against non-whites on the principal that they're just going to lose business anyway.
We don't need to allow it on any principle other than, they have the right.
But, wait, they actually don't go out of business.
So what? I can hear your rage building. BUT THEY DESERVE TO BE PUNISHED!!!
That's not for you to decide Mr. Christian man.
Then, let's say, other businesses begin doing the same. Next thing you know, you have numerous of businesses that are allowed to discriminate because "they might lose business".
GASP! What if...people actually exercised the freedoms they were given?! OH THE HORROR!!!
What if we legalize weed and then other people start smoking weed too?! Oh god. Think about the children!!! If we legalize prostitution people might have sex for money!!!!
AAAAAAHHHHHHHH IF YOU CAN'T EXERCISE YOUR RIGHTS BASED ON MY SUBJECTIVE MORTALITY YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE RIGHTS AT ALL!!!
Calm down Mr. Christian. No one is forcing you to discriminate or smoke weed or have sex for money.
BUT I DON'T LIKE IT!!!
Im very sorry to hear that Mr. Christian but this is America and the law is designed to protect us all equally and the racists, whores, drug addicts, homosexuals and everyone else has the right to be anything they want to be and live that lifestyle without infringing on the rights of others.
Does that really bother you so much? Are you SOOOOO offended that racists will gather together and pay extra for shit drinks?
Crazy.
My Friday night isn't changing.
[–]JAT621Jersey Village 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
1) But, wanting only Mexican or white people is infringing upon my rights. My right as an equal citizen. Just a heads up, there's a huge difference between having a Mexican themed night where ANYONE can attend and having a Mexican themed night where only Mexicans can attend.
2) Wait, you're comparing me (someone who wants equal treatment) to racists (people who wanted segregation and discrimination)? What you're defending: The right for businesses to choose who they can refuse business to based on skin color is exactly what Jim Crow Law was.
3) This is not a guarantee. Let's say there's a black couple living in a racist town. The owners of every business in this racist town wish to only serve whites. What does this black couple do? Your answer would be to move towns, most likely. But, let's say the town over does the same thing. Then the next town. Then the next state. Hell, the whole country. We're only talking about a bar here. What if it were a grocery store? A gas station? A pharmacy?
4) My feelings aren't hurt. This was not a personal attack on me. It's funny how you think my feelings are hurt possibly because you're assuming I'm one particular race. You don't need to be black to be outraged about injustice.
5) Aaaand, no they don't have the right. It's literally in the constitution that you are not allowed to discriminate based on race, nationality, creed, religion, gender, etc.
6) I'm actually pretty calm. This business is receiving flak as they should. To me, justice is being served. I think you're experiencing conjecture. You think I'm angry probably because you yourself are angry. You're the one who has decided to respond with an essay. I'm only replying to be nice.
7) Again. Discrimination isn't a right. What constitution are you reading?
8) Now that I've reached the end of your rant I have to say I'm confused. On one end, you're preaching about our rights and how we should be treated equally. Then, you go and defend the very same people who want to treat people unequally and want to discriminate.
9) You can respond to this and all of reddit will see but it won't matter to me because I'm only typing this out of boredom. Peace.
[–]Tiltboy -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1時間前* (0子コメント)
1) But, wanting only Mexican or white people is infringing upon my rights.
How? Be specific. Your right to what?
My right as an equal citizen.
Wow...You think you have a right to equality in the world? No sir you do not. You have a right to equal protection under the law. That's it.
Just a heads up, there's a huge difference between having a Mexican themed night where ANYONE can attend and having a Mexican themed night where only Mexicans can attend.
Sure is and all of it is illegal. Why? Because of people like you.
2) Wait, you're comparing me (someone who wants equal treatment) to racists (people who wanted segregation and discrimination)?
Yes. A racist forcing segregation is simply the tails to the SJW who wishes to force "equality".
You are two sides to the same coin.
Your morality tells you everyone is equal and you will use the force of law to impose that on people like them who disagree.
Likewise, their morality tells them that we are not all equals and as such used the force of government to impose Jim Crow law which forced segregation upon those who disagreed.
Do you understand? I don't know how else to say it.
What you're defending: The right for businesses to choose who they can refuse business to based on skin color is exactly what Jim Crow Law was.
Yes. I am defending the rights of racists and homosexuals and drug addicts and all the other people you might not like.
They ALL have rights. ALL of them.
Also, no, Jim Crow was a law FORCING segregation. It was not the same thing.
3) This is not a guarantee. Let's say there's a black couple living in a racist town.
Ok.
The owners of every business in this racist town wish to only serve whites. What does this black couple do?
Probably not shop there.
Your answer would be to move towns, most likely.
That's what I would do but how does just one black couple end up in a racist white town? This scenario is illogical from the start.
Two 30 year old black people just magically appear one day in a racist town? How did they grow up there? How did they buy the house? How did they get groceries to eat?
But, let's say the town over does the same thing. Then the next town. Then the next state. Hell, the whole country.
Oh Jesus Christ. The slippery slope fallacy. Hahaha if gaslamp is allowed to discriminate then the entire country is going to fall into a 1600s mentality?
Hahahahaha no sir and I'm not even going to entertain this nonsense.
We're only talking about a bar here. What if it were a grocery store? A gas station? A pharmacy?
Grocery stores are necessity services and bar is not. A pharmacy is a necessity service and a gas station is not.
If a gas station is a necessity in your eyes then driving must be a right and not a privilege so...good luck with that.
I don't assume you are anything sir. Are you trying to make this personal because everything I've stated has been targeted generically, not personally.
Im not saying YOU as in you personally. Im saying YOU as in you who might get turned away.
Im sorry you didn't understand that.
No sir. That is NOT in the constitution.Hahahahahahaga wow.
If that was in the constitution we never would have had slavery or a ban on gay marriage. Hahaha holy shit. Are you for real?
6) I'm actually pretty calm. This business is receiving flak as they should.
I agree. They should. Its a shit establishment operating with a shit door policy.
Too bad we don't have the right to force them to close their doors.
To me, justice is being served.
No its not. You won't see justice served till they close down.
I think you're experiencing conjecture. You think I'm angry probably because you yourself are angry.
That would be projection. ;)
You're the one who has decided to respond with an essay. I'm only replying to be nice.
Well yea. I take this subject very seriously as it effects us all. Any law you pass effects me sir. What don't you get about that?
When you start banning behavior you personally find inappropriate there is a problem and people should worry.
Again, it is a right. I have every right to be a racist, bigoted piece of shit if I want.
If i want to sell cakes, I have the right to decide who to sell them to based on WHATEVER criteria I choose.
That's what individual rights are. That's what the constitution protects above all else.
Prostitution, incest, homosexuality, discrimination, abortion, drug use etc etc.
All constitutionally protected rights.
8) Now that I've reached the end of your rant I have to say I'm confused.
Im not surprised but happy to help.
On one end, you're preaching about our rights and how we should be treated equally. Then, you go and defend the very same people who want to treat people unequally and want to discriminate.
Yes because you have a right to discriminate dude. We strive for a FREEEEEE SOCIETY here right? So the right to choose who you do business with is a right to defend.
In a free society not everyone acts as we like. Not everyone believes the same but everyone SHOULD have the understanding that its part of life and if we begin to make subjective morality the basis of law it gives way to many, many very real and serious problems like DOMA and the drug war. If allowing a bar to operate a racist door policy prevents things like the drug war, I'm all for it.
Cool. You should probably take these things more seriously though.
[–]PissNmoaN 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
Is it possible to discriminate aginst discriminators?
[–]Houstonredditistrash -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 3時間前 (1子コメント)
Long time lurker here, made an account so i could up vote this comment. Houston sub is full of yuppies hopping on the PC band wagon patting themselves on the backs for getting a shitty bar shut down. Like they want a black person to see their keyboard crusade and go "Oh those are the good white people! Thank you for fighting for our rights! What would we do without the houston redditors!" Fuck outta here fam
[–]schulenburg 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
Also mostly a lurker - this idea that people are PC to alleviate white guilt or look good - it's bullshit. If I think it's wrong that people get overcharged due to the color of their skin, it's called empathy. I feel bad for others because I know it hurts to be mistreated for something beyond my control. That isn't some "bleeding heart yuppie shit" - it's what makes people decent. Golden Rule and shit.
If you think people are only decent to look good to others, you have some cynical views on humanity.
[–]_soangry_ 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
good god, did you miss the civil rights part of history in school?
[–]PruWaters -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
If you don't like it go somewhere else.
[–]vetworker24 -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
The might as well put up a sign that says, ONLY GOOD LOOKING WHITES!!
[–]Zchavago 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Going there this weekend. Looks like I'll be getting in free.
[–]Houstonredditistrash -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
Social justice one two three
woo woo
I wanna be PC
It's just the way to be for me
And you
Your hateful slurs are through
I call woo woo on you
We'll fight until you're PC black and blue
We are language police Fighting bigotry
Hurtful words can suck our turds
Coz it's PC for me
And You
YYYEEAHH
FUCK YEAH PC BRO
[+][削除されました] 8時間前 (1子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]steelsunWestbury 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
But so right.
[+]BrotyKraut スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13ポイント-12ポイント-11ポイント 6時間前 (1子コメント)
I for one am all for it. Price should be $40.
[–]150407East End -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
Oh hey
π Rendered by PID 25431 on app-98 at 2015-09-26 02:27:05.829680+00:00 running 72eab47 country code: JP.
[–]QuickStopRandal 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]weezleMontrose 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]McHardism 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]QuantumBear 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SmilingDaemon 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]mcbordes 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]sean_emery09 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]mcbordes 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]caffeineTX スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14ポイント-13ポイント-12ポイント (36子コメント)
[–]Reeko_HtownHobby 26ポイント27ポイント28ポイント (32子コメント)
[–]caffeineTX 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]_soangry_ 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント (9子コメント)
[+]caffeineTX スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]PiousAugustus 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]poptamalePearland 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]vetworker24 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Tiltboy -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]poptamalePearland 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Tiltboy -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Libertarian_Bro 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]_soangry_ 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]lajdslkasflkasdflkas 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Tiltboy 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Tiltboy -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]Nolat 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (8子コメント)
[+]Tiltboy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14ポイント-13ポイント-12ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]JAT621Jersey Village 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (3子コメント)
[+]Tiltboy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]JAT621Jersey Village 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Tiltboy -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SlofutMontrose 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Houstonredditistrash -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Tiltboy -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]JAT621Jersey Village 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Houstonredditistrash -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]JAT621Jersey Village 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Tiltboy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]JAT621Jersey Village 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Tiltboy -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]PissNmoaN 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Houstonredditistrash -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]schulenburg 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]_soangry_ 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]PruWaters -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]vetworker24 -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Zchavago 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Houstonredditistrash -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (0子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (1子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]steelsunWestbury 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]BrotyKraut スコアが基準値未満のコメント-13ポイント-12ポイント-11ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]150407East End -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (0子コメント)