上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]takua108Neutral [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Look, okay, this is the long and short of it:

Most people who post here are not interested in having a discussion; they just want to "get one up on" their ideological "opponents."

Nearly everyone, including mods like Hokes, ignores the description in the damn sidebar:

We have two main goals here.

First and foremost, this should be a place where healthy discussions can be had without the flinging of talking points and rhetoric.

Secondly, this is a place where you can hopefully start to see people not as the labels that have been assigned to them, but as actual people.

And of course, this is not limited to just the "anti-" "side". Both "sides" are guilty of the same shit, because the problem is that we have "sides" to begin with.

Having different opinions, or sides, on an issue is one thing. Conflating several opinions under gigantic fucking umbrellas like "GG" and "anti-GG" is hopelessly fucking stupid.

If I want to ask what people think about an issue, and I admit to taking the side that "GamerGate" "takes" on that issue, I get called a gator, and I inherit every sin that GamerGate has committed.

The same goes for the inverse, but to a lesser extent. It's fucking stupid both ways and doesn't foster communication and discussion, it just gives everyone ammunition to snipe at each other with.

It's a waste of fucking time for all parties involved. I honestly don't know how you moderators remain as moderators; if I was moderator, I would've either pushed for massive reform or stepped down long ago.

Basically, I don't see any point in keeping this subreddit going in its current incarnation. You might as well shut it down. No good comes from it, just a lot of outrage, anger, and drama. I only keep coming here because I keep deluding myself into thinking it'll get better.

It really won't.

[–]AwesomeInTheory [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

This is gonna get lost in the deluge of comments on here, but.

I unsubscribed from this sub like a week, week and a half or so ago. I came back over here because I saw that there was a lot of "drama" and it sort of echoes why I stopped following this sub. Also, I don't really give a shit about Nyberg beyond the fact that I think they're sick in the head and that the police should be involved if there's any belief of criminal wrongdoing. No need for an Internet witchhunt or continued handwringing (from either side) over it.

I find GG interesting from a media studies/journalistic standards perspective. Everything from analyzing Sarkeesian's videos (which I find to be interesting and frustrating) to whatever else is going on with Eron's court case to what's happening in my hometown (the idiocy with the Honey Badgers.) I honestly thought that this place was somewhere I could read/participate in debate/discussion.

However, I found that this subreddit moved way too slow. I'd come in and check and see if there was anything new, and it just was all sort of stagnant. I wasn't really interested in delving into a 700+ comment thread that was fairly old...particularly given the content.

The fact that there are/were big and cumbersome threads wasn't really an issue for me -- I've gone through years old threads on /r/UnresolvedMysteries and gobbled that stuff up. It's the fact that a lot of the content was name calling, thinly veiled attacks and just general dickishness that was a turn off for me.

I don't really want or need to read a bunch of shit that goes "well, you lack reading comprehension" or "I didn't realize all Gators were out of touch with reality" or "this is just something a typical Ghazi poster would say" in a forum that is purportedly about debate and discussion. I really don't need/want to be seeing it from the moderators.

I made one report about a mod acting inappropriately (in my mind) and nothing was done about it. Nothing was done, despite similar actions being taken against non-moderators doing the same thing.

I'm not demanding that action or anything should happen -- the subreddit can be run however people want it run. I just found reading stuff in here to be a waste of time and not much different than reading stuff in either KiA or Ghazi...both of which I do read.

I'm of the opinion that this sub really isn't worth it anymore. But if you're looking for feedback, I'd argue that trying to foster discussion and discouraging petty/immature behavior should be things to gun for. Case in point: the "ironic" flair titles are stupid and are just reminiscent of KiA/Ghazi. Especially for moderators, mainly because it sets a tone that is at odds with the intended purpose of this subreddit. The call for 'more content' also shouldn't be read as a "allow topics on Nyberg" argument, but rather the fact that in terms of content on here, this sub is pretty slow at cranking it out, for whatever reason.

[–]EwindalNewest Cool Kid [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

instead of playing Destiny (on my 360)

Sooo, very little? >360 >destiny >smug_anime_face.ogg

Seriously though, just fucking remove Hokes. He does nothing that literally anyone else can do just as well. He brings nothing but shitposts and salt to this place.

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (108子コメント)

ATTENTION PEOPLE: PEOPLE HAVE GOTTEN DEATH THREATS OVER WHAT I'VE SAID. IF YOU'VE DONE THAT, KNOW THAT I THINK YOU'RE WORSE THAN ANYBODY INVOLVED IN THIS CONTROVERSY, ANY CONTROVERSY, GAMERGATE, ANTI-GG OR WHATEVER, ANYTHING AT ALL. FUCK OFF. GO AWAY, DO NOT COME BACK, AND APOLOGIZE TO WHOEVER YOU'VE DONE THAT TO. THIS IS JUST STUPID INTERNET SHIT. PEOPLE GOT HURT, BUT THAT'S NO REASON TO HURT ANYONE ELSE. THAT'S ALL. NOTHING THAT YOU THINK HAS EARNED THAT LEVEL OF IRE COMPARES TO THAT UTTER LEVEL OF PUTRID, VILE, DISGUSTING SCUMFUCKERY, AND YOU SHOULD REEVALUATE WHO YOU ARE AS A PERSON IF YOU EVEN THINK THAT COULD BE ACCEPTABLE.

Bullshit.

Hokes actively tried to get me to apologize for not liking their moderation the moment I got there. There wasn't a day that went by that Hokes said Scarlet, I, and occasionally Unconfidence were part of an conspiracy to bring them down whenever we said that we disagreed with Hokes.

You want to throw out that Hokes did minor things? You want to say that the rest of the mods did the same things? Be prepared for me to tell everyone what actually happened then, because you're lying, and I expected better.

  • Hokes would deliver speeches about mod solidarity whenever they were questioned or someone said something that they didn't agree with on this forum, trying to shame and guilt and yell them into line. Do you know why we did that? Because Hokes would use greentext to deliver their own opinions under the guise of official moderator response. Frequently, Hokes would try to get us banned from voting on mod decisions, from daily business to top mod.

  • Hokes drove off RaineyJ this was, the most polite, unassuming, soft-spoken person on the team, left crying, resigning without a word, and leaving this sub, because they felt the atmosphere was so oppressive, that they couldn't express their own opinion without getting beaten down.

  • You want to know what the rest of the team did yesterday? They justified what happened to her, and Mudbunny said, "How was I supposed to know?" instead of taking responsibility. Yeah, because when you have a mod that is repeatedly allowed to go outside of the rules and calls conspiracy on anyone who disagrees with them or shames them for having opinions, who could feel unwelcome, eh?

  • Hokes went outside the rules. They claimed to have executive power and would remove posts that other moderators voted to approve, only saying that "I couldn't allow this thread to stand." or, "I can't trust you to enforce the rules, so I have to do it myself." They tried to enforce the moratorium before all votes were in, which is what the last removed post was about.

  • They repeatedly insulted other users personally in mod mail and were never punished, with only one incident yesterday being the real crackdown, and even then, it was just a stern comment. Yeah, moderator accountability my fucking ass. Oh, and Hokes got warned for personally insulting one person in a thread months ago. Progress!

  • As soon as Hokes figured out that I was close to a certain person (my boyfriend), he continually insulted him and insisted I was leaking things to him, on top of a variety of other people with zero evidence, along with anyone else he disagreed with, including Scarlet and Unconfidence. Yeah, an actual witchhunt against people Hokes didn't like from someone who constantly cried 'WITCH' when it came to people Hokes didn't like disagreeing with them.

  • Hokes pushed an effort to allow no one to comment on the rule change (6), and not post the rules to the sidebar, insisting on a list of banned topics to be updated. Did I mention that Hokes pushed for the moratorium to protect someone after we'd have CP discussions continually without anyone objecting? Because, hey, what's an open discussion forum for both sides without a list of banned topics banned for questionable reasons whenever it's convenient for one side?

  • After Mudbunny said that Scarlet and I could stay in the off-site mod talk board in the non-mod topics, Hokes banned Scarlet for hosting a tell-all AMA where he exposed Hokes' behavior. Mudbunny didn't see the problem. More than that, the justification Hokes used for banning Scarlet wasn't even something that he said, but another user, and was merely about Judge stepping down. Yeah, not even on the scale of what I've told you guys, but Mudbunny wouldn't DARE try to do any of that shit to me in my thread, because deep down, he knows it's wrong.

  • The best part? Mudbunny just didn't check who had said what had gotten Scarlet banned. Hokes was just allowed to ban one of his critics for no reason, and Mudbunny saw no reason to be suspicious and never apologized for doing it. None of the other remaining mods gave a shit either. Hey, why should I be surprised?

You're fucking kidding me, Mudbunny, if you want to say that any mod did ANY of what you're claiming they did. Take some damn responsibility. Because you seemed to eager to do so here:

http://imgur.com/a/mK1GD

Yeah. No one did what Hokes did, and no one cared because they had no interest in holding anyone to account. What they did was deplorable, and the only crackdown was on anyone speaking out. You said that you would take responsibility, and you're still covering up for Hokes.

It's despicable.

I should have stopped Hokes from accusing those who disagreed with them as being part of a witch hunt. Sometimes, disagreement was simply a disagreement.

Yes, only sometimes, and Hokes only accused those who disagreed with them as being part of a witch hunt, not him creating an environment of constant baseless accusations of conspiracies, including continued efforts to name his critics as people leaking modmail content or doing the work of other users to the point where RaineyJ felt so beaten down and afraid to speak that she left silently, crying and feeling like no one ever cared about her contribution to the team. Oh, and only sometimes a disagreement was a disagreement.

You'll say to my face that I tried so hard to work with Hokes and that you failed as a top mod to let things happen this way, that you didn't step in and solve the problem, but around here, you're content to shove it under the rug, downplay it, and blatantly lie about what happened.

Fuck you.

. I should have stopped people trying to get Hokes disciplined for every minor thing that they do a lot sooner.

Oh yes, all of those things I listed? Minor things that everyone did, apparently. Not even remotely true, but hey, feel free to parrot what Hokes said in Slack yesterday and say it's your own opinion, despite it being entirely false.

[–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (17子コメント)

The best part? Mudbunny just didn't check who had said what had gotten Scarlet banned. Hokes was just allowed to ban one of his critics for no reason, and Mudbunny saw no reason to be suspicious and never apologized for doing it. None of the other remaining mods gave a shit either. Hey, why should I be surprised?

is scarlet banned?

[–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Did I mention that Hokes pushed for the moratorium to protect someone after we'd have CP discussions continually without anyone objecting?

Oh only like 4 of us, if not more

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Sorry, that was worded poorly. That means that we had numerous discussions on CP without any controversy and without anyone objecting to them. We had one thread that same day, and we even discussed it at length in our mod chat, and not a single person said, "Hey, maybe we should follow this moratorium."

The decision to re-instate the moratorium was controversial. That, I'll freely admit.

[–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It was a hot topic a few months ago when the 8chan fiasco was in full force, serious discussions about banning the topic were had

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Saint wound up doing it themselves. When it died down, people stopped enforcing it. Then the moment this hit, they decided to bring back the moratorium. It wasn't about, "Oh, CP content is so awful!" Because we were just discussing it and no one cared. It was, "We have to protect this person from allegations!" again, which is evidenced by the popular argument, "These are criminal accusations and they should go in front of a court, not us!"

...despite Gamergate being chocked full of them and not being an issue to discuss here.

[–]catporPro/Neutral [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

[...]DEATH THREATS[...]

Oh, lord.

Disagree with people--vehemently even!--but don't be an ass. It does nobody any favors least of all you or your argument(s).

[–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (30子コメント)

You want to know what the rest of the team did yesterday? They justified what happened to her,

Honestly, I still don't even know what happens, and I do consider that a problem.

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (29子コメント)

Judge, you were there when it happened. I saw you talk. Why didn't you say anything? I know you, and I know this is a problem for you, but why not solve it?

[–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

I literally have no clue what you're talking about.

Here's the thing with me and slack - it doesn't work on my work PC. Nearly all of my posting is done at work, which is why I make maybe 5 or 6 posts most weekends.

So I have to slack on my phone. A Windows Phone, which means the Slack apps don't work much. And it's obvious when I'm not doing work, since my phone is in my hand.

As a result, I miss a lot of stuff in slack. Sometimes I pop open the app and there are 200-300 unread messages in General. And the app starts me at the bottom without telling me how far up to scroll.

On top of this, during redundant drama unlikely to get resolved my eyes would glaze over.

So, honestly, no clue what happened. None. I thought Rainey was just a quiet mod, like so many others we've had. Or uninterested.

This isn't an excuse, just an explanation. I reached out apologizing. Even not knowing what happened is awful and inexcusable enough.

[–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I like that when I say "I was wrong," someone comes in and calls me disingenuous.

[–]BattleChimp [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You should consider reporting hokes to reddit for harassment/abuse.

[–]Teuthex [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Did I mention that Hokes pushed for the moratorium to protect someone after we'd have CP discussions continually without anyone objecting? Because, hey, what's an open discussion forum for both sides without a list of banned topics banned for questionable reasons whenever it's convenient for one side?

So much this.

[–]Mnhjk1 [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

I thought you'd left? If you're gonna flounce, flounce - if you want to stay and air your grievances, don't get our hopes up by telling us you're leaving. Your drama mongering has been far worse for this sub than 1000 Hokes'.

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Mudbunny got my collaboration on this post because he asked and said that he was sorry and would be taking responsibility for all of the awfulness, as you've seen. I feel like it's worth weighing in, given that. I'm not participating in any other threads and am in this meta stuff only because I'm telling you it's all bullshit.

[–]macinnebAnti-GG [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Your drama mongering has been far worse for this sub than 1000 Hokes'.

To be fair I don't think Hokes gives a fuck, as where Bashluff very clearly cares very much.

[–]None-Of-You-Are-Real [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Hokes mods twenty-five different subs that are indistinguishable from SRS, it's very clear that this person gives a lot of fucks. This person is obsessed.

[–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

And not giving a fuck is the worst sin of all, apparently.

[–]ashye [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

"Why don't you care and understand!?!? He wrote FIVE words about her while they were sleeping together!!"

[–]surfpro [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

You need to step away from this. What you're doing is unhealthy. This is disturbing. 1100 words just in this post alone. I don't even want to imagine how much time you've wasted on this. Step away from the computer and read a book or something. It's not worth it. This is all just bullshit internet drama.

[–]woxxon [スコア非表示]  (18子コメント)

For real, do you guys not realize how pathetic this vendetta looks? Jesus, you're leaking PM's and all, fucking deplorable. Like, consider the stakes, and the scope of what you're talking about, for one second.

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

I don't give a damn. When someone gets hurt and people JUSTIFY the hurt, defend the people who hurt them, those people deserve what's coming, and I'm going to do whatever I can to make sure everyone knows it.

[–][削除されました]  (3子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    I'd argue you're hurting your argument by straying from the more reserved but still very forceful initial resigning statement and diving headlong into a full bitter war over this.

    that's been my reaction at least.

    point where RaineyJ

    this isn't the type of information i'd be comfortable sharing without their explicit agreement

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    They posted about it on my thread, and honestly, I'm caring less about being nice or polite or reserved when people get hurt and other people make excuses for it, cover it up, and refuse to take responsibility for it.

    I know what you're saying, and I'm really not holding back anymore only because I've lost all respect for the staff and where the sub is going--censorship city--and the only reason I'm here, really, is to make sure that everyone knows what really went on. Because Mudbunny talked about how they would do that and take responsibility and all of this, and then blatantly DIDN'T.

    Because you know what? I trusted Mudbunny to say shitty things about me that were true, admit the massive problems that went on, assign blame to where it belonged, and lay it all out there. I was going to come in here to say that yeah, I'm not blameless for fighting so hard or being so loose with my thoughts the other day, and that I'm happy that he decided to make an effort to be more open and honest.

    But here I am, with that not happening, and with another person that I thought would be a good person turning out to just do this, and so why should I care?

    [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    I'm caring less about being nice or polite or reserved when

    I didn't actually say "I want you to be nice and polite and all that good stuff." I said "you're hurting your argument" at least in my eyes. That's important as i take your goal to be to convey information effectively (cue generic citation of yale professor kahan at culturalcognition) not simply vent. This additional stuff gives it more of a venting vibe which makes me more likely to discount it. my honest opinion.

    obviously we can counter with concern troll allegations.

    [–]cha0sPro-GG [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    So what you're saying is you're making a big deal over nothing. Oh wait, double standards, right? Double standards.

    [–]GhoostP [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

    Ban GamerGate discussion.

    Ban social justice discussion.

    Only imgur posts of empty cans of Pringles and further discussion of how good those Pringles probably tasted before they were gone.

    [–]tracker2208 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    As long as you disclose any paid endorsements from the Pringles company I'm cool with that.

    [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    If we have PringlesTM we need to allow the dunk gifs back for justice.

    [–]surfpro [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

    Dust off and nuke this subreddit from orbit. it's the only way to be sure.

    edit: I'm not even joking. I'm being 100% serious. Gamergate will never die unless this subreddit goes down.

    Banning everyone and deleting the forum forever would be a net benefit to society. Seriously, think about it /u/mudbunny. You have the power. With a few keystrokes you can deny yet another forum for gamergaters to spread their slanderous prurient bullshit, which is all the movement ever was in the first place. Look at this fucking mess of a thread.

    Honestly mud, you have a duty to end the madness now while you still can. Deny the obtuse shitslingers and yellow-underpantsed trolls their precious forum. DO IT

    [–]Steampunk_MoustachePro-GG [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Shut down the subreddit and replace it with a Doom 2 Invasion server.

    [–]Kyoraki [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Fuck that, better idea.

    TF2 Payload race server. Pro on one side, anti on the other. Hokes can even join in and weave conspiracies about the enemy snipers using aimbots.

    [–]RaineyJ [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Nobody will probably notice my post since I'm late here... but I do want to say that I didn't enjoy my time. As soon as I joined up, a certain someone started flirting with me and I tried to stay nice because I didn't want to ruin his time on the community since everyone else seemed to like him. I didn't want to be the person that made him take off and then people would blame me or something... But honestly, I was freaked out. I told the other mods I've had stalkers in the past and only Youchoob messaged me to make sure I was okay. I used to talk a lot more before that happened, but afterwards I felt very intimidated over everything.

    Hokes' attitude was very off-putting, especially for anyone who wasn't sure about what was going on behind the scenes beforehand. I remember trying to explain to Hokes that their "throw the baby out with the babywater" approach to modding wasn't right. I was pretty disturbed over their lack of understanding that you can't just label everyone a racist or whatever and ban them because they used a certain word. Obviously, what I said didn't make an impact.

    The CP defence stuff was something that really got to me. Hokes did seem to want to defend Sarah using the article she'd written, and the only reason I was able to get my say was because I victim of molestation as a kid. After I revealed that, Hokes didn't really respond back. I voted against the moratorium, which brought it to 4 vs 4, but my timezone probably meant I was too late for it to count. My timezone kinda meant that I was late to a few topics I wanted to add my opinion or vote to... It seemed like everyone had already finished discussing it by the time I rocked up and nobody really cared to make sure my voice was heard or consulted. Still, I made sure to read every single thing people said because I wanted to try and keep up. When everyone was arguing all the time though, it was hard to get a word in. I tried, but mostly it seemed like I got ignored. I started to wonder if people had voted me in just so I could be a doormat and I feel like maybe I was. I was just there to fill a quota the sub needed, to the point some users didn't even know I even existed at all. Nobody noticed I was gone, my leaving seemed to have dismissed and nobody asked if I was okay until I reluctantly said something, and Mudbunny didn't even bother to contact me for the OP of this thread. It's like I never existed.

    [–]middlekelly [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I'm probably not one to talk, as I've never posted here before. I've lurked and read a handful of posts here, and the users come off as aggressive. I've said this before- specifically to the moderator Unconfidence- that this subreddit has a pair of noble goals, in being a place for healthy discussions and seeing people as people, not as just another cog in a hivemind.

    Reading some posts here, it doesn't look like that would actually happen, and my solution has been to just stay away. I'd very much like to have an honest discussion, but as an outsider, it doesn't seem like people would take my posts in good faith nor does it seem like anything could be actually accomplished by talking.

    Part of that is due to timing: this has been going on for over a year, and people very much have made up their minds, and unfortunately, this paints both sides as walking stereotypes repeating the same tired arguments over and over again.

    But again, this is just me commenting as a total outsider. I like the idea of the sub, but it's execution has kept me away.

    [–]Bitter_one13Angry1sixthprimenumber [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Do I hit the reset button, nuke all the content, implement new rules and start over with a blank slate?

    No, I don't think that's necessary.

    Do I continue as is, and hope that this post is enough of a spotlight on responsibility that people change?

    No. Hokes has been called out as a bad mod lots of times, and it hasn't worked previously. Hell, Spawnzer is a mod for Ghazi as well, and has managed to maintain a modicum of civility.

    Do I take a hard line and pre-emptively ban those I see as the worst of the shitposters...those that toe the line and are clearly not here for any sort of conversation? (This is a group that includes both pros and antis, FWIW)

    I think that's a good idea.

    Or do I simply set the sub to private, and demod everyone but myself?

    I'd be more comfortable with Youchoob as the one supreme mod.

    If we (and by we, I mean the mod team and the users) don't do anything and just try to business as usual our way through this, the sub is toast.

    Agreed.

    where does the sub go from here?

    Where the controversy called Gamergate goes.

    [–]ryargerAnti/Neutral [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    I think you solicit new mods to restore the balance of Pro/Anti and move on. Drama is inevitable and turnover is high for mods on debate subs.

    [–]wharris2001Pro-GG [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    My first suggestion honestly is to kill the sub as it has failed in its essential purpose. It was a noble idea "If we get people to just talk to each other, they can learn to live with each other and see that the other side is not so bad after all." This has not happened, and I do not believe it will happen even with revisions to the subreddit.

    If you do want to make another go, then I think the most essential aspect is to create clearly worded and rigorously enforced moderation standards that are acceptable to both sides. I would also suggest moderators who do not have passionate opinions on the subject and who can refer to the 'other' side without insult. One big part of the current blowup is the sudden enforcement of a rule that many posters were surprised to learn existed at all -- and honestly I'm not at all sure why people are shocked that a moderation team with 4 anti-s and 3 pro-s would have a 4/3 split on changes to moderation policy.

    [–]gawkershillNeutral [スコア非表示]  (18子コメント)

    Shut down the sub and go play video games. Reconvene after two or three weeks and have everyone vote on what should happen then.

    There's too much drama and negative energy going on to make a good decision now.

    [–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah![M] [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    I like this idea

    [–]mudbunnyGrumpy Grandpa[S,M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I like your liking this idea.

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    A mod is using greentext to express their opinion!

    MOD ABUSE.

    [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Burn him? Burn him. So says Brad Wardell

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Jokes? In green text? You think you can add some levity to this discussion in an official moderator capacity? My father will hear about this.

    [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

    After going, I dunno, months without playing a game (maybe 2 hours of FTL as my only gaming since March), I finally got around to A Wolf Among Us.

    Great game. Tempted to play again, as an asshole instead of a nice guy, but I don't have that kind of time...

    [–]MrWigglesworth2I'm right, you're wrong. [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    go play video games.

    But what are antis going to do during this time?

    JOKES PEOPLE

    [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    *Clutches pearls* Well I never!

    [–]Predicted [スコア非表示]  (16子コメント)

    Remove all mods, add an even number of mods from both sides that have proven to argue intelligently for their side without ad hominem or hyperbole.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (15子コメント)

    Remove all mods, add an even number of mods from both sides that have proven to argue intelligently for their side without ad hominem or hyperbole.

    You want stalemates? This is how you get stalemates. Because the 2 people that fit that definition probably still won't agree on a lot.

    [–]ashye [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

    Mod a random number of users every day based on something random. Let Chaos Reign!

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Let Chaos Reign!

    My first suggestion already covered that. :P

    [–]TymaretAnti/Neutral [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Remove all mods, make /u/malky the only mod, subreddit will improve by 200%

    [–]ALLAH_WAS_A_SANDWORM [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Why half measures? Give mod powers to everyone and anyone who has ever posted here. Then sit back, and enjoy the fireworks.

    [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    In my darker moments I suggest a day without mods, or a Butts topic that is wholly unmoderated (except for doxxing or threats.) Chaos indeed.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (29子コメント)

    My only idea is make /u/Malky top mod.

    [–]MalkyThe fuck did I do? [スコア非表示]  (28子コメント)

    Who the fuck upvoted this.

    [–]HMRandCSOLOMON GRUNDY WANT FLAIR TOO [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I did. Drama Queen Extraordinaire, at your service. ;-)

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (20子コメント)

    Not only did I upvote this, I'm going to break my extended hiatus to throw my support behind /u/Malky for top mod.

    Dunk gifs for everyone!

    [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    I don't think Dunk gifs should be banned, I think we should have a complex system to mitigate their damage.

    • If you only post a Dunk gif, you can't comment in that thread again or you will get a temporary ban of 32.7 hours.

    • If you post a Dank meme it must be in response to a Dunk gif.

    • Only 1 Dunk gif per thread is allowed, other Dunk gifs will be deleted unless they are actually Dank memes, then appropriate banning will be enforced.

    • Posting 3 Dank memes and no Dunk gifs will result in a 2 year temporary ban.

    • If you post a Dunk gif after a comment chain of 11 posts, you are exempt from these rules.

    • If you post a Dank meme after a comment chain of 7 posts, you will be permabanned for 3 hours.

    u/Malky is exempt from all rules except this one.

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Too many loopholes, these rules are ripe for abuse.

    Before posting any Dunk Gifs or Dank Gifs you have to disclose your gif-posting history, including any and all interactions with /r/DunkGifs, /r/DunkGifsInAction, and /r/DankGifs.

    Only after approval by a supermajority of mods should will you be allowed to post gifs, and only on a provisional basis until a period of no shorter than a fortnight has passed.

    It's the only way to prevent gif abuse.

    [–]MalkyThe fuck did I do? [スコア非表示]  (13子コメント)

    I thought we were friends.

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (12子コメント)

    Hey man, the ~24 hours when you were mod were the best this sub ever had.

    I believe in a thing called /u/Malky.

    [–]macinnebAnti-GG [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

    Wait... they made Malky a mod? And this sub wasn't replaced with a dunk gif?

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

    I think it was pre-dunk gif. It was like November or December last year.

    [–]pornyspongeof the regrettable flair. [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    I'm out of the loop here. What is this le "dunk gif" of which ye speak?

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    It used to be that when someone anti made a rather clever reversal of an argument or some pithy remark, Malky would respond with a dunk gif to that person. Then it became a thing for other people to do and mods eventually removed as many as they could under rule 2 despite it not exactly fitting in there. Then they added it to rule 6. Now we're here. At the height of dunking, this was basically Malky.

    [–]mudbunnyGrumpy Grandpa[S] [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Yeah. We ended up getting a lot of pro-GGers whining in modmail that the dunk gifs were unfair, or mean, or insulting or something.

    Basically, it hurt their feelings.

    [–]MalkyThe fuck did I do? [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    It's like basketball but with nerds.

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    If you think this mod drama is buttery, you should have been here when they modded Malky.

    [–]macinnebAnti-GG [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    I wouldn't say 'buttery' so much as dumb =P I mean it's dumb drama involving dumb people over dumb moderation of a dumb debate over a dumb 'movement' that I'm dumb enough to hang around.

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Yeah, I can't say I disagree on any particular point. It's pretty dumb.

    But entertaining!

    [–]HokesOneAnti-GG Mod | Misandrist Folk Demon [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    ilu bb

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Uh oh, you're gonna get me put on a list of Hokes-supporters.

    (Keep up the good work! HokesOne for President of Anti-GG!)

    [–]DocileBanalBovineEthics are forged in the fires of flamewar [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Why are we still mucking about with 'president'? We need to do some despotic censoring, make them god-emperor already

    [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    people who think you're secretly nouri al maliki

    [–]Paladinlst [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

    The problem isn't Hokes's opinion, because we're here because we have strong opinions - you just can't moderate from them.

    To describe /u/HokesOne 's philosophy, I'm going to quote myself here -

    My opinion is fuck your opinion.

    Which is fine for posters, but really terrible for mods. They skirted around it, but if it were up to them, no posts from /u/Razorbeamz would have ever been allowed. They'd couch it in some very odd interpretations of Da Rulez, but all they're doing is trying to adding legitimacy to their own personal hatred.

    They removed posts because he didn't like them. It was clear they'd use whatever interpretation of the rules worked to make sure that posts and posters they liked stayed and ones they didn't left. And because it had so little to do with rules or standards and everything to do with espousing their philosophy, when they'd get caught in obvious hypocrisy or double standards, they'd try to wiggle around the rules to fit, saying it didn't apply to mods, or didn't apply to green text, or that mods with less seniority couldn't comment.

    I was told repeatedly I was part of a fucking witch hunt, when what I wanted was a uniform standard of accountability. If you take a look at the mods as they were, who was most likely to have to deal with stringent standards of mod responsibility and accountability? Hokes and I, obviously. I was the one pushing for it, fully knowing that I might struggle with said standards, because having good standards and accountability is how the subreddit gets things done and doesn't turn into drama balls. Hokes wanted no such thing.

    Now when I left, /u/Bashfluff came in. I'm not going to beat around the bush here. Bashfluff and I are dating. We started dating after she became a moderator The reason I popped my head back in was because Bashfluff said she left. I happened to notice /u/othellothewise's post and decided I'd try to insert my boot into his smug and condescending face.

    For the record, I had no idea about the mod election shit until Bashy posted it the other day and I asked her. I hadn't really asked much about the state of the subreddit except that she was clearly miserable on several occasions, and while I support everything she does, I did state from the moment she got involved that it was a bad idea and that it was a bad idea because of Hokes. I did know that Hokes was trying to squeeze her out of the decision making process, because it was frustrating the shit of her.

    The moratorium was dredged off the bottom of the lake because Hokes likes Sarah Nyberg and didn't want to deal with her being savaged, as well as the same guilt by association techniques that were used after FoldableHuman's little dumpster dive, which for the record, was one of the most deplorable fucking things aGG has ever fucking done. I fully understand not supporting Hotwheels in any way, but trying to connect the GamerGate subs to CP is like trying to connect GamerGhazi and Coontown. It was wrongheaded and meanspirited identity politics.

    Ultimately, the fact that /r/youchoob was hung out to dry for that little Dog-and-Pony show shows how little Hokes is willing to stand behind their own bullshit. If the moratorium was so important to you, you should have stood in front instead of making youchoob do it. Hokes has repeatedly made mudbuddy and saint and others apologize or outright lie to not put Hokes in front of their own behavior.

    To pretend that this is a GG takeover is to willfully disregard the facts and buy into a narrative. Very simply, as long as Hokes refuses to put aside their agenda when moderating, then there's nothing that can be done.

    All of your choices will simply circle this back around to the same point, and the only difference is how long it will take to get there.

    [Actually, on second thought, I think you should capitulate in the most fantastic way possible. Make Hokes the top mod. It's going to prove the point one way or another. Either this was a witch hunt and Hokes will usher in a new golden era for the subreddit, or Hokes will burn the place to the ground. If I had to wager a guess, Hokes will do nothing for approximately two months, and then try to slowly shift this place as far anti-GG as he can without making it look ridiculously obvious, blaming and or banning the rebellious GGs as they go.]

    [–]Kyoraki [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    So basically this pretty much confirms what I've been saying for months, that Hokes is completely paranoid, has a nasty attitude problem, and is incapable of separating attacks on his opinions from attacks on his shitty behaviour.

    How many times is it we've been through this dance now? Hokes is completely incapable of going a month without sparking some sort of massive mod drama. Now I get that Hokes likely isn't at fault for all of them, but he's still certainly at the centre of every single shitstorm this sub has ever had. It's time for him to take responsibility for once, step down, and give this sub a fresh start before it's too late, assuming we haven't already reached that point. Even if it's only to put a stop to the mod drama once and for all.

    On an unrelated note, I find the idea of you two browsing the sub together and shouting at the screen weirdly adorable. I hope you're coping well.

    [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (78子コメント)

    My take on all this?

    Our mod team was broken. We invited people because we wanted dissent, but we didn't get the dissent we wanted, or productive dissent. This isn't blaming Scarlet or Bash, or Hokes. We all made this error.

    Our modding didn't get more fair. It didn't get more thoughtful. It got slower and less decisive, detrimentally so. And the mod talks became less like people working together for the good of the sub and more like people picking battles that don't go away. It, frankly, felt like a lot of conversations on this sub. Mods were becoming less available because modding became like slamming your face against your keyboard. Everything was slowing down.

    Being a good mod here means being able to separate your opinions of GG from your opinions on how a sub should run. This is why we often feel like it's hard to get a good pGG mod - it's easier to see the lackadaisical attitude in aGGers and the passion in GGers, and harder to determine who can turn that passion off. Modding isn't about winning, it's about putting your ego aside and making the forum run better.

    We want GGers here. We want that interaction. I've argued in the past we should get a KiA mod, which would probably be a disaster but it may make GGers trust us more. I've argued we should shut the sub with a redirect to one with a better name. And, of late, I've thrown out that maybe we should just call this "discuss a topic with an aGGer" rather than a true debate sub, giving in to the name and current staff. I don't want to do this.

    Listen, a lot of you do not trust us. It's an equal mix, given mod mail, but some GGers are much more vocal about it on the sub. Dissent is contagious, and it becomes a "thing" to voice it. One thing to do is try to change. Another is to cut out the dissent and keep the people that are happy before those that aren't spoil them. In truth, we often vent about the people we would love to cull from this forum. It's not the people you think first. And it's an equal mix - for a mod team that is so heavily aGG you'd be surprised how many aGGers we think make our jobs much, much harder. Even ones we interact with well here we discuss bans about, objectively, on the forum.

    We want this place to run well. It's hard to make that happen. You guys hate each other. You hate us. It's really hard keeping this place running, and keeping anyone trusting, when everyone hates everyone. It's been going decently thus far. I'd love to keep it that way.

    [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Our mod team was broken. We invited people because we wanted dissent, but we didn't get the dissent we wanted, or productive dissent. This isn't blaming Scarlet or Bash, or Hokes. We all made this error.

    and this seemed to bleed out into the wider sub amplifying sub nuking feelings

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    You know what? This is 100% right. We all do share some blame in how things wound up, from people being apathetic about problems, people causing problems, people not taking responsibility for problems, and people not dealing with problems the right way.

    [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    I said some things in chat last night after you'd left. The last words I saw from you were "ooo, delicious," and then you were gone. Also unsure if I missed something there.

    I do not blame you exclusively, or you and Scarlet. Hokes has as much blame. The straw that broke the camels back was a fine hill to die on, to mix metaphors.

    But I think the whole thing could have been handled better by all however many of us there are/were. A big part of it was that everyone knew Hokes and Scarlet would clash, and thought we could get it out of the way quickly. You joining in was a surprise. It emboldened Scarlet and it made Hokes feel more attacked. It escalated faster than anyone could respond.

    Which, again, isn't blaming you for doing what you thought was right, and isn't taking blame off of people not doing anything - everyone shares it equally. It's how I view things, not how I assign blame.

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    I said some things in chat last night after you'd left. The last words I saw from you were "ooo, delicious," and then you were gone. Also unsure if I missed something there.

    The moment I saw them defending what happened to Rainey, I asked Mudbunny to remove me, but I figured out how to do it myself before he could or would do something about it.

    But I think the whole thing could have been handled better by all however many of us there are/were. A big part of it was that everyone knew Hokes and Scarlet would clash, and thought we could get it out of the way quickly. You joining in was a surprise. It emboldened Scarlet and it made Hokes feel more attacked. It escalated faster than anyone could respond.

    That's where I'm not going to agree. Mudbunny was the head of things and could have stepped in at any time to say, "We need to solve this." That didn't happen. Just, any effort at all would have helped. From anyone. Anyone at all. There never was. You can always respond to it, just as we could have, which I would assign myself blame for.

    Not equal blame for everything, but not nothing.

    [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    The moment I saw them defending what happened to Rainey, I asked Mudbunny to remove me, but I figured out how to do it myself before he could or would do something about it.

    Was that before or after "ooo, delicious?" Was it in General?

    You have no idea how confused I am. Banana told me to scroll up more, but I didn't see much beyond that. Just casual conversation about, I think, a milkshake. I noticed you were gone only because I opened up the user list to see who we still had, as I wasn't sure.

    Again, I think this is my failing. I should have been more aware. I'm willing to take all blame for someone that happily looked aside because being ignorant to what happened isn't any better.

    . Mudbunny was the head of things and could have stepped in at any time to say, "We need to solve this."

    I think all this happening as a new leader came up was also an issue. I think Mud, being new, didn't want to throw authority around before he'd felt he'd earned it. You see it often. People getting employees for the first time often screw up by thinking they haven't earned it, particularly when promoted over peers.

    Again, not a defense. He should have. I just understand why he didn't.

    Not equal blame for everything, but not nothing.

    I'm willing to take plenty for being quiet.

    [–]GhoostP [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

    All this makes me want to face palm so bad.

    Our mod team was broken. We invited people because we wanted dissent, but we didn't get the dissent we wanted, or productive dissent.

    Your idea of how to mod is broken. You wanted dissent but were unhappy when that dissent disagreed with you. You were hoping it would be a soft dissent, where at first they held a different opinion but then they saw the judge light and understood how you were right all along. When they didn't agree with you and somehow you couldn't win them over, it ended up being frustrating for you.

    Our modding didn't get more fair. It didn't get more thoughtful. It got slower and less decisive, detrimentally so.

    That's because you think your opinion is the fair one and anyone else's thoughts are misguided. Its an obvious attitude through your posting. Being decisive because the entire team is biased in one way isn't a better method, its just what you think is fair.

    This is why we often feel like it's hard to get a good pGG mod - it's easier to see the lackadaisical attitude in aGGers and the passion in GGers, and harder to determine who can turn that passion off.

    What? Were you picked for your lackadaisical attitude? You were one of the most emotional and constantly riled up Anti posters, and you aren't the only one who is a current mod. Its like you wanted a mod team of 75 %extreme Antis and 25% moderate GG and thought it would even out somehow, but that's simply not how it works. Anyone who can champion diversity in the work place should be able to see how the lack of equal diversity in a mod team will naturally be biased.

    It's really hard keeping this place running, and keeping anyone trusting, when everyone hates everyone.

    You very commonly throw out group based insults to evade breaking the rules while also immediately creating creating a negative environment that hurts further discussion. Why?

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

    No, he's right. There was some bias on the staff, I'll admit, but it was more fair than I thought it ever was going in. Fighting the bias there and the horrible actions of a few people did clog up the off-site mod chat, and while people should have cared and tried to solve it instead of doubling down, it shouldn't have taken over everything like the three of us (sometimes four) made happen.

    It was four people clashing, constantly, consistently, whether up front or behind the scenes, and no matter how much I think what Hokes did was abhorrent or even just wrong, Scarlet and Unconf and I and Hokes should have done what we could to solve it. Attempts were made. Mudbunny said I tried damn hard. But it was too little, too late, and everyone was just sick of it. If we all tried to sit down and discuss our own problems, things never would have gotten here, but we were all so mad or paranoid or annoyed or scared or whatever it is, that didn't happen, and people stopped caring if it would.

    Judge is fine. I've never come into a situation and said, "Man, Judge is awful." Maybe I think that on occasion that he makes the wrong calls, but not in moderation, ever. He's reasonable, polite, blah blah blah. If you want to assign blame to the staff, fine, but do your research.

    [–]GhoostP [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    Scarlet and Unconf and I and Hokes should have done what we could to solve it.

    Do you really think that was possible with Hokes? This is like the 3rd or 4th wave of mods quitting, while they are playing the victim card about a 'witch hunt' to all the antis, who are predisposed to eat it up without question. Hokes has been pretty open in the past about believing reasonable debate with GamerGate shouldn't be had because its a net negative, why would you want anyone who clearly states they are in disagreement with the mission statement to be in charge of upholding that mission statement?

    When a mod team supports the inclusion of a stick in the mud fixture who has consistently prevented reasonable discussion and flow of the sub; after a while it become their fault for allowing it to continue.

    [–]Dapperdan814 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    When a mod team supports the inclusion of a stick in the mud fixture who has consistently prevented reasonable discussion and flow of the sub; after a while it become their fault for allowing it to continue.

    This. How, after every crisis this board's mod team has had, is Hokes one of the only ones coming out of it relatively unscathed? Maybe the one fixture that doesn't change through multiple iterations is the cause of those iterations failing, every time? Why is that hard to grasp?

    [–]ZorbaTHut [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    "I just don't understand how all our sheep keep getting eaten every night! All our sheep except this one, who, every night, is covered in blood, and whose clothing doesn't seem to fit properly. How does this keep happening? Well, let's get another herd and put our sole surviving sheep in with them again!"

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Do you really think that was possible with Hokes?

    That doesn't matter. The ends do not justify the means. We should have done things better, no matter what Hokes was doing, to try to make it work. Even if it couldn't work, it was on us to try to do so.

    This is like the 3rd or 4th wave of mods quitting, while they are playing the victim card about a 'witch hunt' to all the antis, who are predisposed to eat it up without question.

    Yep. That doesn't change anything. That's only made them paranoid and frustrated, and we could have been the people to change that.

    Hokes has been pretty open in the past about believing reasonable debate with GamerGate shouldn't be had because its a net negative, why would you want anyone who clearly states they are in disagreement with the mission statement to be in charge of upholding that mission statement?

    Because they have almost never let that show in their moderation. Hokes does tend to act beyond the staff and more according to their own morality, but one thing they've never done is to willfully shut down discussion they don't like--until the moratorium, anyway. We could have solved that and prevented it, and while it doesn't excuse what Hokes has done or what any of the other staff didn't do to solve this, I'm not blameless in this. Nobody is.

    [–]the_8th_guest [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    We want this place to run well

    I laughed out loud reading this.

    You choose to keep a mod that is dedicated to making the place run poorly. Full stop.

    [–]MrWigglesworth2I'm right, you're wrong. [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

    To be blunt, they feel that it is almost entirely (to the point the exceptions prove the rule) made up of pro-GG people who are unhappy that Hokes is not in the slightest bit shy in sharing their opinions on Gamergate and gamergaters.

    Neither is /u/judgeholden72. But his posts don't usually break the rules by consisting of nothing but insults. And on the odd occasion that they do, he doesn't go around warning people for responding to him in kind, rigidly enforcing the rule he just broke himself. I also am not seeing multiple former mods talk about judge's totalitarian behavior behind the scenes... ostensibly because it doesn't happen.

    And wouldn't you know it, I haven't seen anyone calling for judge's head here, despite him very clearly being no fan of GG. I'm sure it's happened, but it doesn't appear to be popular idea, and I would personally oppose it. In fact, I'd say he and the other anti-mods, as much as I may disagree with their opinions, generally do a good job given the circumstances. If anyone starts calling for their heads as well, I'll oppose it. You can screen cap that. I'll oppose it because this place requires good moderators from both sides to function. If I wanted an all pro circlejerk I'd go to KiA... but I probably make 100 comments in here for every comment I make in KiA, because I generally dislike circlejerks.

    But this why I don't buy /u/HokesOne 's witch hunt defense. If my, or others, interest were merely in chasing off the most vehemently anti-gg mods, then hokes would not be the sole target of this supposed witch hunt. And yet, here we are. Hokes is a target because they regularly and repeatedly and flagrently breaks rules. Every other mod has broken rules too at some point. Hell, every regular poster here, myself included, has broken rules. But no other mod does it so habitually and brazenly... and frankly, most rule 1/2 violations I've seen come at the tail end of a long and heated argument, not in the opening salvo. This behavior is bad enough on its own, but the fact that it comes from someone who is supposed to enforce rules against it... and who rigidly does so with people other than themselves... makes it particularly unacceptable.

    I don't know if hokes needs to go altogether, but they certainly need some sort of censure, because this behavior coming from a mod needs to stop.

    [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Thanks for creating this post

    Do I take a hard line and pre-emptively ban those I see as the worst of the shitposters...those that toe the line and are clearly not here for any sort of conversation? (This is a group that includes both pros and antis, FWIW)

    that's my two cents but i'm not sure if it would work.

    [–]Strich-9Neutral [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    At least once, a transgression for which it was asked Hokes be demodded, Scarlet was found to be doing at the same time.

    This doesn't surprise me at all

    [–]GiveAManAFishAnti/Neutral [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    But there's no option for keeping both sides.

    I feel like this could constructively be reframed as "There's no option for keeping the two most vocal sides." Those who are out for blood, be it one one side or the other, the mod team or not, will always want someone's blood to be spilled as restitution for past wrong-doings. So, in those cases, pleasing the outraged of both groups would be banning the outraged of both groups, and neither side will be happy with it.

    However, for the users that are in the subreddit for the discussion purposes in the sidebar, those who genuinely want to debate and share points, will find the various threads a lot quieter, and will likely take significantly less offense to a wide-reaching ban like that.

    Assuming you agree with the above, the best question to ask yourself is "Are these people instrumental to the subreddit I want this to be, and if not, is it worth the subsequent fallout of banning both parties?"

    Personally, I'm fine with it as-is, but I'm also aware that many others really, really aren't.

    Do I hit the reset button, nuke all the content, implement new rules and start over with a blank slate?

    Subjective rules like those necessary for this sort of subreddit are always going to have detractors. For those who are interested in only following the strictest, most technical letter of the law, any vagueness in regulation is ultimately going to be met with teeth gnashing, anger, outrage, and ultimately, accusations of favoritism.

    Again, this will boil back to what you want as a subreddit owner. Is this the sort of subreddit you want to run? Would having a clean slate with stricter rules be closer to your ideal goal? Or would more loose, relaxed rules be better? Or is this existing ruleset fine, but with the provision that all rule violations from your clean slate point subject to harsher penalties? These are your calls to make as an owner, and as end users, it's our decision to figure out if those rules are okay with us. If not, there are other subreddits.

    Do I continue as is, and hope that this post is enough of a spotlight on responsibility that people change?

    Doubt it. Public shaming tends to be more polarizing than punitive.

    If you want my advice on how best to proceed, hire a subgroup of the mods to operate an Appeals Board. The Appeals Board doesn't handle day-to-day subreddit moderation, they are only tagged in when a mod action is disputed. The board has final say on mod actions, and can overturn mod action at their discretion. The Appeals Board doesn't answer to mods, nor do mods answer to them. Two closed groups, one that actions posts, the other that determines the validity of the action on disputed posts.

    It will keep moderation honest, is easy to police because the Appeals board can only act on committee, and are directly in contact with you for complications that arise.

    Just my two cents.

    Do I take a hard line and pre-emptively ban those I see as the worst of the shitposters...those that toe the line and are clearly not here for any sort of conversation? (This is a group that includes both pros and antis, FWIW)

    I suggested as much above, and I'm happy with this solution. Discussion is the point of this sub, and those uninterested in debate are just flooding the good content out.

    Or do I simply set the sub to private, and demod everyone but myself?

    Again, your call to make. I don't believe that this will foster a good debate environment, but that's just my take.

    [–]axialage [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Whelp, not the first subreddit ruined by petty mod drama no one gives a fuck about, won't be the last.

    [–]BattleChimp [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    /u/hokesone's response to criticism for the last year has been to dismiss it as a conspiracy against him. I made this point from the beginning and it's being repeated today. Do you all realize what kind of person ignores all criticism and immediately pretends they're being witch hunted, regardless of what's actually happening?

    Take a good look at yourself hokes. You think everyone is against you. You're just, like, so super effective at your nannying that everyone has to rally against you to fight back, right? Nah, people just don't like hypocrites who think they're moral arbiters. You've pretended from moment 1 that all criticism against you is invalid and a result of a conspiracy. It's extremely nutty. For someone who likes to talk about integrity, when you deliberately squelch pedo talk because this time it's about someone you're not against, you clearly lack integrity.

    [–]HMRandCSOLOMON GRUNDY WANT FLAIR TOO [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    /u/Saint2e leaves, sub goes to shit. Who'd have thunk it? Thanks for going out with a bang, though!

    [–]DanyLektro [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    /u/mudbunny,

    Regardless of where you go from here and regardless of what your opinion on the matter is, I think that bringing the positions of the major players in this to the sub in what is clearly a problem that at least some, if not a majority of the community feels it should be involved with discussing, was a good decision.

    As for your opinion and regarding what should be done, I think the two best options that you've suggested might end up polarizing the community.

    I like this:

    Do I continue as is, and hope that this post is enough of a spotlight on responsibility that people change?

    ...because I like to think that people can generally be open-minded and interested in discussion.

    But I like this:

    Do I take a hard line and pre-emptively ban those I see as the worst of the shitposters...those that toe the line and are clearly not here for any sort of conversation?

    because I don't trust them to be.

    The worst part about the first option is that it allows those who ruin discussion but bring just enough to the table to justify sticking around to roam free.

    The worst part about the second option is that sometimes discussion blossoms in adversity. Some of the best discussions I've had here came from pointing out that I had some issues with somebody's crass and overgeneralizing statement (though not always from the person themselves).

    I don't know what you're going to do, I don't know what the community wants to do and the thread is still kind of blowing up with discussion about the situation rather than the solution, but those are the two best options I see, with pros and cons to each of them.

    [–]prolepatriot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    this was a sub for debating?

    could have fooled me

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (16子コメント)

    You need to stop having a secret backchannel unending mod discussion. You have a toxic cesspit back there that no one knows about. Perhaps stop doing that?

    [–]mudbunnyGrumpy Grandpa[S] [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

    Slack is necessary because the modmail that Reddit provides us with is horrible. Smoke signals or emails would be an improvement. And this explosion would have happened whether we were using Slack or reddit modmail.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    I like it better than the public cesspit that happened before it.

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Not that I think you're full of shit, but where exactly was that? Modmetadiscussions were never had in public.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Just the occasional flare up really, it was not a consistent toxic cesspit, but the cesspit showed toxicity in public often enough in like little slap fights between mods and what gets brought up in feedback threads.

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Those fights, held in public, dissipate, as everyone looks at you and says "flounce the fuck off, already."

    Those fights, held in private, fester, because no one has the balls to tell people to put up or shut up to their face on the garbage mod team here except for the witch hunt target of the day.

    [–]casersatzAnti-GG [スコア非表示]  (13子コメント)

    Anti-GG see this place as KiA 2.0.

    Not this aggro. I'll still stand up for this sub any day.

    [–]DakkaMuhammedJihad [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Yeah, despite my problems with the sub I've never seen it as being comparable to KIA. I don't know where that assertion is coming from.

    [–]wharris2001Pro-GG [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

    OK, so anti-GG think the sub is just fine. Pro-GG thinks it's Ghazi 2.0 and the ones that didn't leave in droves the last shitfest are leaving now.

    In what universe does this reflect a nice balance between anti-GG and pro-GG?

    [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Shows GG cant handle anything that isn't heavily weighed in their favor.

    [–]casersatzAnti-GG [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I guess I just don't have pro-gg's thin skin. I can take a lot.

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    Is it opposite day? I thought anti-GG were the ones who couldn't hack it outside their hugbox?

    [–]Strich-9Neutral [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    This just shows that GGers prefer to be amongst people who say and believe what they believe, and don't really want to challenge their ideas. Sinec I started posting here a few months back it's consistenly been more aGGers than proGGers. And there's probably more gamergaters than people who want to argue against gamergate on reddit.

    And the rules basically prevent ANYBODY from getting banned ... so this victim complex isn't really working

    [–]Exmond [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Its been very difficult to have good discussions in this sub. Especially with the recent implementation of Rule 6, in which one of the mods said it was in direct response to what has been going on with Nyberg.

    Thats terrible and very.. reactionary. I don't think the sub can operate like that when one side is very sensitive to claims of censorship (And it gets worse when one side can bring up examples of when Rule 6 could of been implemented earlier)

    There are a few trolls in this sub and when I see their responses (OH am i hurting your GG fee fees) I am amazed as how they haven't been banned yet.

    I think this sub needs to take a hard line and implement their rules. I am against pre-preemptively banning people but I think if people break the rules (and break them often, like 3 times) they should be given a temporary ban.

    As for the mods we need mods on both sides of the spectrum but also mods that will don't demonize the other side. Hokes in particular seems to be proud of the way they demonize GG. Either get all netural mods that are not invested in GG in the slightest, get mods that know how a debate structure work or get the extremist mods out (From both sides)

    I have learned a lot of things in this sub. I just wish it was a lot easier to get a reasonable discussion happening.

    [–]namelessbananaBye Felicia [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

    I almost quit multiple times because of the fighting between Hokes, Scar, and bash. It eventually got to the point where I wouldn't participate and just vote on issues because I didn't want to get in any more yelling matches about what ever procieved microagression that scar and bash had decided was the horrible Hokes action of the week.

    [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Everyone hit that, except Mud, who was in the middle, and those three.

    I hold all three to blame, and something needed to give. In the weeks prior, our mod team had been running pretty smoothly. It had issues, but it was running pretty smoothly.

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    So what you're saying is your shitty backchannel chatroom ruined the modding of the sub, and the solution is to get rid of your shitty backchannel chatroom?

    Good stuff.

    [–]erimanPro-GG [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Seconded. Upvote not endorsement.

    [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (13子コメント)

    how about also a renewed dedication to getting rid of stuff that looks kinda like shitposts

    [–]mudbunnyGrumpy Grandpa[S] [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    The problem is that many of the posts that one side sees as "obvious shitposts" are seen by the other side as "a good point."

    [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    i don't see that. One sentence poop posts are very hard to be "good points." I think some people would be upset but that sort of post seems to be removable.

    I think id be controversial but a vague scheme could be worked out if you're willing to accept some false positives

    [–]jakezorz [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    tbqh this sub lost its relevancy at the end of last year when gamergate lost all relevancy. it was useful then, but gg has been dead for about 9 months (being generous), but it really has no purpose now other than for people to get mad at one another.

    [–]fench [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    I just want to say thank you to all the mods, past and present. You evidently do a lot of hard work keeping this place running and yeah, sometimes you fuck up, but you do it for free and that is great. I still have no idea why I still come here, but I do know that I really really like a lot of people here. I wouldn't have that without you lot, and I am grateful to you for it.

    [–]mudbunnyGrumpy Grandpa[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    I just want to say thank you to all the mods, past and present.

    Thank you.

    [–]YourMomsRedditAccout [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    where does the sub go from here?

    I think Jim Sterling (thank god for him) said it best:

    "Grow up...and fuck off."

    [–]ashye [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

    Looks like everyone who wanted a public mod fight is getting their wish.

    [–]SenouNeutral [スコア非表示]  (37子コメント)

    There is no silver bullet in this case.

    I've said it before but I think a good first step is to cull the posters that just post snark and point scoring one liners. Give them a warning and ban on the first repeated offense no questions asked.

    EDIT: I mean for god's sake there are even jokes about the posting of dunk gifs.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    I've said it before but I think a good first step is to cull the posters that just post snark and point scoring one liners. Give them a warning and ban on the first repeated offense no questions asked.

    Then nobody comes here. This topic is entirely focused on by people who love shitposting and gotchas and emotional arguments and pseudo-intellectuals who are "above" a lot of the emotions and love to ponder the politics of it all and then variations on those two themes. Pseudo-intellectuals got nothing if the other people don't show up, and we get /r/outofgaming which, sadly, is a practically dead sub.

    [–]SenouNeutral [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I agree that doing this would decrease the population of the sub significantly but disagree that it'd be a total wash. If you ask around the people that regularly post/lurk the sub they'd be able to identify most of the key shitposters/gotcha-seekers because they're beyond obvious & consistent (albeit with a fair amount of bias depending on the "side" they're on).

    Similarly - I'm fairly sure there are a selection of posters that the majority can agree are reasonable and participate in discussion in good faith. (Again - albeit with bias)

    [–]JamisonP [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Find moderators that can separate their feelings from their duties. AntiGG, ProGG - doesn't matter. Demod everyone who can't do that.

    edit: on second thought, GG drama has grown stale. Reading more about this moderator drama is tres itresante, so please continue.

    [–]Arimer [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I really just need someone to play through the entire gears of war series with me on xbox one.

    [–]razorbeamz [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

    Do I take a hard line and pre-emptively ban those I see as the worst of the shitposters...those that toe the line and are clearly not here for any sort of conversation? (This is a group that includes both pros and antis, FWIW)

    Don't beat around the bush. Give us a list.

    [–]ScarletITActually it's about Ethics in AGG Moderation [スコア非表示]  (18子コメント)

    Can you remind me for which transgression I asked Hokes to be demodded despite having done the same (which by the way would be consistent with my philosophy, If Hokes did something that deserve demodding he deserve demodding and if I did the same doesn't mean he doesn't deserve demodding, just that I deserve demodding as well, and I never tried in any way to escape judgement or punishment for anything)

    [–]mudbunnyGrumpy Grandpa[S] [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    You asked for Hokes to be demodded when they removed posts that other mods had already approved. Shortly thereafter (close enough that it could have been the same time, my recollection is kinda fuzzy), you did the same thing, and removed posts that had previously been approved by other mods.

    In both cases, the rest of the mods said (a) do not do that anymore, we have a procedure in place for when you disagree with the decision of a previous mod; and (b) neither case was worth talking about even bringing to mod discipline.

    [–]ScarletITActually it's about Ethics in AGG Moderation [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    umh no. when that happened we already established the rules for mod. now I don't remember exactly what I said (and I'm no longer there to have a reference) but I'm pretty sure I have NEVER invoked for instant demodding after establishing the procedure to demod a mod and we both know hokes (or anyone else for that matter) was nowhere near that threshold. At best I would have said something like "this happened we should probably vote on whether this warrants a disciplinary act or not" maybe in an heated way depending on the mood, but I never asked to skip the procedure we established for eventually have a mod demodded.

    When I removed post that were previously approved by other mods I had a majority of votes before doing that, the only problem was that the way we created the rules were rushed and flawed. I did exactly what we said would have been the new rule (if someone take a decision 2 mods can overrule it, then again 3 would overrule it again and so on) Then we kinda all agreed that the way we established that rule was dubious and everybody had a different idea on how would have been translated in practice and we stood there together working on a better rule. we reached the decision on a minimal number of mods needed to overrule a decision, when a simple majority is sufficient and when a bigger margin is needed and after how much time a vote should be considered effective. and as soon as anyone had a problem with the way things have been handled I believe I have been nothing but collaborative, and if I am not mistaken I also offered myself to the judgement of the other mods if they felt that my conduct deserved a reprimand even though was me interpreting some imperfect rules as Written that we agreed on.

    Of course feel free to correct my recounting of the events if you feel they are wrong somewhere.

    [–]AN4RCHID [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Just remove Hokes as mod. This is never going to be a place where civil discussion can happen, while someone who is so aggressively partisan and, frankly, an asshole, is in a position of authority.

    And please start enforcing rules 1 and 2, even when the violator is aGG. I haven't been back here in a while, but things have gotten a lot uglier and a lot more partisan since the last time.

    [–]jabberwockxenoPro-GG [スコア非表示]  (40子コメント)

    I haven't been here in like 2 months, can I get a tl;dr of what this is all about? I can gather bits and pieces from the post, of course, but I feel like i'm missing a lot.

    Anyways, my views have always been that rules 1 and 2 need to be enforced better. There's far too many posts that are just insulting or sarcastic or are just making a hostile statement, or aren't actually responding to the points of the person they are responding to. In short, they aren't actually discussing anything or are open to back and forth discussion.

    Also, last time I was here, there were a lot of topics/posts being submitted and accepted that were poorly made and extremely biased. I say be stricter about what you guys approve.

    [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (39子コメント)

    Long and short of it this has been going along for a long ass time.

    Hokes is very strong in their opinions. A lot of people here didn't like the fact that their is mod that thinks GG is pretty much the Anti-Christ (eggageration for effect). So for as long as i can remember there has been a decent sized group of people trying to get hokes removed from the mod possition. Well a few of these people were on and joined the mod team and all hell broke loose. Hokes seeing this whole collective effort to remove them became kind of paranoid (from what I understand) and became more inflammatory and confrontational, which only served to rial up the anti-Hokes brigade. Which fired up Hokes more, which fired up the brigade and on and on and on.

    And here we are. The breaking point I guess.

    Its all stupid.

    [–]mudbunnyGrumpy Grandpa[S] [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    For a single paragraph, this sums things up decently well in a very high-level overview kinda way.

    [–]woxxon [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

    I for one am all for shutting it right down. Most of the shit that comes up here is barely worth talking about, at least certainly not with the significant number of people that come here to stick their fingers in their ears and repeat their tired, horrible bullshit every day. Or at the very least, some ignorance-based rules should be enforced, where that kind of shit can't happen anymore and the people who make that their bread and butter won't be welcomed.

    *e: Actually, you know what

    We can cater to one side, and lose the other, or cater to none and lose both.

    I kinda can't believe this is being presented as a dilemma. I always forget that there's actually people who seem to legtimately think there's two equally valid sides to this thing. Like I'm actually taken aback sometimes, when faced with the realization that certain people actually think some kind of important or fruitful discussion is taking place here, with the kinds of people that overwhelmingly make up one side of the constituency. And they still constantly whine about how they get treated here, in a place that gives them faaaarrrr more consideration than is actually fair. The mistake this place makes is earnestly thinking gamergate points are worth addressing. I really don't think I can frequent or support a place that does that, anymore. It's been fun sticking my foot out in front of the toddlers running around throwing their tantrums, but if we're going to actually pretend like they have a point, I think I'm out.

    [–]erimanPro-GG [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Everyone has different standards of valuable discussion, but that does not mean we can police "value" according to one of those interpretations. For example, when someone sees what they do as the equivalent of "sticking their foot out in front of the toddlers running around throwing their tantrums" then I would consider that lacking in value, but I'm not going to enforce restriction, going instead for a principled counterargument.

    [–]woxxon [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Principled counterarguments don't mean much to people who don't appear to have any principles. But I'm not saying to enforce any particular restrictions. If anything, I almost think the restrictions currently enforced might be a bit too strict, and are preventing some thin-skinned offendatrons around here from getting much needed wake up call.

    I just can't abide by a place that pretends shit like this, or this, or this, or this, or this is any "discussion" not only worthy of respect, it actively stands in the way of the scorn, disgust, and/or ridicule such things thoroughly deserve.

    Also, I'm beginning to find it a bit... depressing, still giving gamergate any attention, even when it's negative, because it truly isn't even worthy of that. And it's just so boringly stupid. It seemed kinda fun, when I first started realizing some of the dumb and bad things certain people around here seemed to believe in, but then it did a big uncanny valley kinda thing, where it just got real sad, realizing just how much certain people around here seemed to believe in some of the dumb and bad stuff they did. A year ago, I thought gators were dumb, bad, and obstinate. Now I know that they not only are, but to degree that I could have never imagined. When it comes to interesting thought provoking discussion about videogames, gators make every thread feel like that swampy place from Mad Max Fury Road. I really just can't even take it anymore.

    [–]Teuthex [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    Good, get gone. No one wants you here if all you're going to do is claim your side is right and demonize the people who disagree with you.

    [–]DanyLektro [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    No one wants you here if all you're going to do is claim your side is right and demonize the people who disagree with you.

    I really wish this were true.

    [–]Cadfan17 [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    Honestly... I think everything is fine.

    Forum moderation seems reasonably effective given the situation. You know, acknowledging that perfect parity on a post by post level isn't possible when unreported posts are rarely reviewed and when multiple mods are applying subjective criteria.

    There doesn't seem to be any notable moderation bias. In that, very little is moderated away, and you can say pretty much whatever you want as long as your comment has substance.

    I couldn't care less about what the mods do on other subreddits as long as what happens there stays there.

    I also can't care less about mod on mod drama that doesn't affect actual moderation decisions in a way significant enough to notice.

    I think everything is pretty much fine, and those whining just want special privileges for their side, or special penalties for their enemies. So fuck 'em and keep on keeping on.

    [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    [–]Meneth [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    They're not wrong about the sub tho. The sub is doing fine.

    Obviously their internal situation was terrible, but if it weren't for them going public so dramatically, no one would ever notice.

    [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    I actually do agree with Cadfan, I just couldn't help posting that image cause him saying "everything is fine" reminded me of it.

    But ya, the only people who actually care about this stuff are people I didn't care about in the first place. None of this actually matters.

    [–]havesomedownvotesAnti-GG [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I know I'm enjoying every line of this. The sub isn't allowed to "discuss" the doxxed users de jour, and we've turned the hatred inward. Simply delightful.

    [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (72子コメント)

    There is no good option.

    Boot Hokes and the pro-GG people will find a new witch-hunt, it's the modus operandi of gamergate.

    Keep Hokes and the pro-GG people will continue their witch-hunt until Hokes does something actually worthy of demodding in the eyes of the whole community, not just the blatantly biased witch-hunters ,and that will justify the witch-hunt in those peoples eyes like every other situation where they throw shit at the wall until something sticks.

    both options leads to more shitting up this sub with witch-hunting bullshit.

    This topic was never going to have healthy debate, because "gamergate" itself is unhealthy obsessive level garbage on all fronts. People are losing their god damn minds over the mod drama in a sub with 50 active uses on average. It's so ridiculous all I can do is laugh at it and all the people who take it as seriously as they do.

    So I say either say fuck it, let the whiners leave and leave the sub as is, no one is ever going to be satisfied and this was never going to be a serious place for discussion anyway, not with this topic, and not with this sub name. The people who want to argue will come back, the people leaving are "to scared for debate" anyway.

    Or shut it down and start a sub unrelated to GG that you guys can mod, and nothing of value will be lost.

    where does the sub go from here?

    The net is vast and infinite. What ever happens, it's been "fun" so far.

    [–]woxxon [スコア非表示]  (18子コメント)

    It's so ridiculous all I can do is laugh at it and all the people who take it as seriously as they do.

    I really wouldn't believe it, if I wasn't watching it unfold in front of me.

    [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (15子コメント)

    We are breaking 90 users right now, and that's only because all the whiners are running to KiA and posting about this sub. This place is just another platform for GG to either spout it's bullshit, or pretend to be victimized by.

    [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (12子コメント)

    Weve become the new focus of gg it seems. Ghazi almost moved onto mostly non-GG content at this point so yelling at them doesnt get gg anywhere. So we are the new target. I mean ffs we have a sticky on kia. What is wrong with people

    [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

    Ya that washed away any respect I had for Scarlett whatever. I mean i never really respected their opinion on GG, but i thought they were a fine mod. That post was literally "hey yall go brigade this sub I am mad at" level crap tho.

    [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Oh look we are the #1 KiA post again. What the fuck is going on?

    [–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

    [removed]

      [–]woxxon [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Well that is what they do best.

      [–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      This is the reason why I've been barely active the last month and a half (well I'm also back to school & still working full time, but still)

      [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Everyone backed away for a bit, and users noticed how much slower we got.