上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 259

[–]gawkershillNeutral [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Shut down the sub and go play video games. Reconvene after two or three weeks and have everyone vote on what should happen then.

There's too much drama and negative energy going on to make a good decision now.

[–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah![M] [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

I like this idea

[–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Jokes? In green text? You think you can add some levity to this discussion in an official moderator capacity? My father will hear about this.

[–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

A mod is using greentext to express their opinion!

MOD ABUSE.

[–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Burn him? Burn him. So says Brad Wardell

[–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

After going, I dunno, months without playing a game (maybe 2 hours of FTL as my only gaming since March), I finally got around to A Wolf Among Us.

Great game. Tempted to play again, as an asshole instead of a nice guy, but I don't have that kind of time...

[–]Teuthex [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

After going, I dunno, months without playing a game

:O

YOU FAKE GAMER GIRL!

[–]MrWigglesworth2I'm right, you're wrong. [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

go play video games.

But what are antis going to do during this time?

JOKES PEOPLE

[–]Bitter_one13Angry1sixthprimenumber [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Do I hit the reset button, nuke all the content, implement new rules and start over with a blank slate?

No, I don't think that's necessary.

Do I continue as is, and hope that this post is enough of a spotlight on responsibility that people change?

No. Hokes has been called out as a bad mod lots of times, and it hasn't worked previously. Hell, Spawnzer is a mod for Ghazi as well, and has managed to maintain a modicum of civility.

Do I take a hard line and pre-emptively ban those I see as the worst of the shitposters...those that toe the line and are clearly not here for any sort of conversation? (This is a group that includes both pros and antis, FWIW)

I think that's a good idea.

Or do I simply set the sub to private, and demod everyone but myself?

I'd be more comfortable with Youchoob as the one supreme mod.

If we (and by we, I mean the mod team and the users) don't do anything and just try to business as usual our way through this, the sub is toast.

Agreed.

where does the sub go from here?

Where the controversy called Gamergate goes.

[–]takua108Neutral [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Look, okay, this is the long and short of it:

Most people who post here are not interested in a discussion; they just want to "get one up on" their ideological "opponents."

Nearly everyone, including mods like Hokes, ignores the description in the damn sidebar:

We have two main goals here.

First and foremost, this should be a place where healthy discussions can be had without the flinging of talking points and rhetoric.

Secondly, this is a place where you can hopefully start to see people not as the labels that have been assigned to them, but as actual people.

And of course, this is not limited to just the "anti-" "side". Both "sides" are guilty of the same shit, because the problem is that we have "sides" to begin with.

Having different opinions, or sides, on an issue is one thing. Conflating several opinions under gigantic fucking umbrellas like "GG" and "anti-GG" is hopelessly fucking stupid.

If I want to ask what people think about an issue, and I admit take the side that "GamerGate" takes on that issue, I get called a gator, and I inherit every sin that GamerGate has committed.

The same goes for the inverse, but to a lesser extent. It's fucking stupid both ways and doesn't foster communication and discussion, it just gives everyone ammunition to snipe at each other with.

It's a waste of fucking time for all parties involved. I honestly don't know how you moderators remain as moderators; if I was moderator, I would've either pushed for massive reform or stepped down long ago.

Basically, I don't see any point in keeping this subreddit going in its current incarnation. You might as well shut it down. No good comes from it, just a lot of outrage, anger, and drama. I only keep coming here because I keep deluding myself into thinking it'll get better.

It really won't.

[–]surfpro [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Dust off and nuke this subreddit from orbit. it's the only way to be sure.

[–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (51子コメント)

My take on all this?

Our mod team was broken. We invited people because we wanted dissent, but we didn't get the dissent we wanted, or productive dissent. This isn't blaming Scarlet or Bash, or Hokes. We all made this error.

Our modding didn't get more fair. It didn't get more thoughtful. It got slower and less decisive, detrimentally so. And the mod talks became less like people working together for the good of the sub and more like people picking battles that don't go away. It, frankly, felt like a lot of conversations on this sub. Mods were becoming less available because modding became like slamming your face against your keyboard. Everything was slowing down.

Being a good mod here means being able to separate your opinions of GG from your opinions on how a sub should run. This is why we often feel like it's hard to get a good pGG mod - it's easier to see the lackadaisical attitude in aGGers and the passion in GGers, and harder to determine who can turn that passion off. Modding isn't about winning, it's about putting your ego aside and making the forum run better.

We want GGers here. We want that interaction. I've argued in the past we should get a KiA mod, which would probably be a disaster but it may make GGers trust us more. I've argued we should shut the sub with a redirect to one with a better name. And, of late, I've thrown out that maybe we should just call this "discuss a topic with an aGGer" rather than a true debate sub, giving in to the name and current staff. I don't want to do this.

Listen, a lot of you do not trust us. It's an equal mix, given mod mail, but some GGers are much more vocal about it on the sub. Dissent is contagious, and it becomes a "thing" to voice it. One thing to do is try to change. Another is to cut out the dissent and keep the people that are happy before those that aren't spoil them. In truth, we often vent about the people we would love to cull from this forum. It's not the people you think first. And it's an equal mix - for a mod team that is so heavily aGG you'd be surprised how many aGGers we think make our jobs much, much harder. Even ones we interact with well here we discuss bans about, objectively, on the forum.

We want this place to run well. It's hard to make that happen. You guys hate each other. You hate us. It's really hard keeping this place running, and keeping anyone trusting, when everyone hates everyone. It's been going decently thus far. I'd love to keep it that way.

[–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Our mod team was broken. We invited people because we wanted dissent, but we didn't get the dissent we wanted, or productive dissent. This isn't blaming Scarlet or Bash, or Hokes. We all made this error.

and this seemed to bleed out into the wider sub amplifying sub nuking feelings

[–]MalkyThe fuck did I do? [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It's probably the other way around.

[–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

i would argue it's a mutually reinforcing cycle we were (are?) stuck in.

There was a fairly steady leakage of mod talk/discontent which served as official justification for increasing criticisms.

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

You know what? This is 100% right. We all do share some blame in how things wound up, from people being apathetic about problems, people causing problems, people not taking responsibility for problems, and people not dealing with problems the right way.

[–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

I said some things in chat last night after you'd left. The last words I saw from you were "ooo, delicious," and then you were gone. Also unsure if I missed something there.

I do not blame you exclusively, or you and Scarlet. Hokes has as much blame. The straw that broke the camels back was a fine hill to die on, to mix metaphors.

But I think the whole thing could have been handled better by all however many of us there are/were. A big part of it was that everyone knew Hokes and Scarlet would clash, and thought we could get it out of the way quickly. You joining in was a surprise. It emboldened Scarlet and it made Hokes feel more attacked. It escalated faster than anyone could respond.

Which, again, isn't blaming you for doing what you thought was right, and isn't taking blame off of people not doing anything - everyone shares it equally. It's how I view things, not how I assign blame.

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

I said some things in chat last night after you'd left. The last words I saw from you were "ooo, delicious," and then you were gone. Also unsure if I missed something there.

The moment I saw them defending what happened to Rainey, I asked Mudbunny to remove me, but I figured out how to do it myself before he could or would do something about it.

But I think the whole thing could have been handled better by all however many of us there are/were. A big part of it was that everyone knew Hokes and Scarlet would clash, and thought we could get it out of the way quickly. You joining in was a surprise. It emboldened Scarlet and it made Hokes feel more attacked. It escalated faster than anyone could respond.

That's where I'm not going to agree. Mudbunny was the head of things and could have stepped in at any time to say, "We need to solve this." That didn't happen. Just, any effort at all would have helped. From anyone. Anyone at all. There never was. You can always respond to it, just as we could have, which I would assign myself blame for.

Not equal blame for everything, but not nothing.

[–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

The moment I saw them defending what happened to Rainey, I asked Mudbunny to remove me, but I figured out how to do it myself before he could or would do something about it.

Was that before or after "ooo, delicious?" Was it in General?

You have no idea how confused I am. Banana told me to scroll up more, but I didn't see much beyond that. Just casual conversation about, I think, a milkshake. I noticed you were gone only because I opened up the user list to see who we still had, as I wasn't sure.

Again, I think this is my failing. I should have been more aware. I'm willing to take all blame for someone that happily looked aside because being ignorant to what happened isn't any better.

. Mudbunny was the head of things and could have stepped in at any time to say, "We need to solve this."

I think all this happening as a new leader came up was also an issue. I think Mud, being new, didn't want to throw authority around before he'd felt he'd earned it. You see it often. People getting employees for the first time often screw up by thinking they haven't earned it, particularly when promoted over peers.

Again, not a defense. He should have. I just understand why he didn't.

Not equal blame for everything, but not nothing.

I'm willing to take plenty for being quiet.

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Was that before or after "ooo, delicious?" Was it in General?

I don't even remember. The moment I saw it, I was blisteringly furious and just wanted out. I wanted noting to do with any people who would even THINK about saying things like that.

Again, I think this is my failing. I should have been more aware. I'm willing to take all blame for someone that happily looked aside because being ignorant to what happened isn't any better.

Alright, thank you.

I'm willing to take plenty for being quiet.

That makes one of the mods willing to take responsibility. How many of you are left, eight? Forgive me if that doesn't instill confidence.

[–]GhoostP [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

All this makes me want to face palm so bad.

Our mod team was broken. We invited people because we wanted dissent, but we didn't get the dissent we wanted, or productive dissent.

Your idea of how to mod is broken. You wanted dissent but were unhappy when that dissent disagreed with you. You were hoping it would be a soft dissent, where at first they held a different opinion but then they saw the judge light and understood how you were right all along. When they didn't agree with you and somehow you couldn't win them over, it ended up being frustrating for you.

Our modding didn't get more fair. It didn't get more thoughtful. It got slower and less decisive, detrimentally so.

That's because you think your opinion is the fair one and anyone else's thoughts are misguided. Its an obvious attitude through your posting. Being decisive because the entire team is biased in one way isn't a better method, its just what you think is fair.

This is why we often feel like it's hard to get a good pGG mod - it's easier to see the lackadaisical attitude in aGGers and the passion in GGers, and harder to determine who can turn that passion off.

What? Were you picked for your lackadaisical attitude? You were one of the most emotional and constantly riled up Anti posters, and you aren't the only one who is a current mod. Its like you wanted a mod team of 75 %extreme Antis and 25% moderate GG and thought it would even out somehow, but that's simply not how it works. Anyone who can champion diversity in the work place should be able to see how the lack of equal diversity in a mod team will naturally be biased.

It's really hard keeping this place running, and keeping anyone trusting, when everyone hates everyone.

You very commonly throw out group based insults to evade breaking the rules while also immediately creating creating a negative environment that hurts further discussion. Why?

[–]adnzzzzZ [スコア非表示]  (34子コメント)

We want GGers here. We want that interaction

Then you shouldn't remove comments because they contain the word "retard"

[–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (26子コメント)

We want respectful, polite GGers that understand that this is part of society at large, not a chan.

Sarah Silverman had a great interview the other day where she discussed how she used to hate "PC," then realized that her calling things "gay" or "retarded" hurt people other than the ones she was intending to hurt, and how removing those uses from her vocabulary took little time, little effort, and made her words more meaningful, because she only insulted those she meant to, not those caught in the crossfire.

You don't need to be respectful to people you're arguing with, but it doesn't hurt to be respectful to those you aren't. For a group so desperately hurt by not being respected, they show so little to people not involved.

[–]adnzzzzZ [スコア非表示]  (25子コメント)

We want respectful, polite GGers that understand that this is part of society at large, not a chan.

Please keep filtering the types of people you want in here and then keep wondering why no one's coming. GGers don't trust you because you can't even see what's wrong with your own reasoning

[–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The only reason they remove posts that include the word "retard" is because your side whines unendingly if anyone calls them anything negative at all.

[–]namelessbananaBye Felicia [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

I almost quit multiple times because of the fighting between Hokes, Scar, and bash. It eventually got to the point where I wouldn't participate and just vote on issues because I didn't want to get in any more yelling matches about what ever procieved microagression that scar and bash had decided was the horrible Hokes action of the week.

[–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Everyone hit that, except Mud, who was in the middle, and those three.

I hold all three to blame, and something needed to give. In the weeks prior, our mod team had been running pretty smoothly. It had issues, but it was running pretty smoothly.

[–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

So what you're saying is your shitty backchannel chatroom ruined the modding of the sub, and the solution is to get rid of your shitty backchannel chatroom?

Good stuff.

[–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Thanks for creating this post

Do I take a hard line and pre-emptively ban those I see as the worst of the shitposters...those that toe the line and are clearly not here for any sort of conversation? (This is a group that includes both pros and antis, FWIW)

that's my two cents but i'm not sure if it would work.

[–]ryargerAnti/Neutral [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I think you solicit new mods to restore the balance of Pro/Anti and move on. Drama is inevitable and turnover is high for mods on debate subs.

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (46子コメント)

Bullshit.

Hokes actively tried to get me to apologize for not liking their moderation the moment I got there. There wasn't a day that went by that Hokes said Scarlet, I, and occasionally Unconfidence were part of an conspiracy to bring them down whenever we said that we disagreed with Hokes.

You want to throw out that Hokes did minor things? You want to say that the rest of the mods did the same things? Be prepared for me to tell everyone what actually happened then, because you're lying, and I expected better.

  • Hokes would deliver speeches about mod solidarity whenever they were questioned or someone said something that they didn't agree with on this forum, trying to shame and guilt and yell them into line. Do you know why we did that? Because Hokes would use greentext to deliver their own opinions under the guise of official moderator response. Frequently, Hokes would try to get us banned from voting on mod decisions, from daily business to top mod.

  • Hokes drove off RaineyJ this was, the most polite, unassuming, soft-spoken person on the team, left crying, resigning without a word, and leaving this sub, because they felt the atmosphere was so oppressive, that they couldn't express their own opinion without getting beaten down.

  • You want to know what the rest of the team did yesterday? They justified what happened to her, and Mudbunny said, "How was I supposed to know?" instead of taking responsibility. Yeah, because when you have a mod that is repeatedly allowed to go outside of the rules and calls conspiracy on anyone who disagrees with them or shames them for having opinions, who could feel unwelcome, eh?

  • Hokes went outside the rules. They claimed to have executive power and would remove posts that other moderators voted to approve, only saying that "I couldn't allow this thread to stand." or, "I can't trust you to enforce the rules, so I have to do it myself." They tried to enforce the moratorium before all votes were in, which is what the last removed post was about.

  • They repeatedly insulted other users personally in mod mail and were never punished, with only one incident yesterday being the real crackdown, and even then, it was just a stern comment. Yeah, moderator accountability my fucking ass. Oh, and Hokes got warned for personally insulting one person in a thread months ago. Progress!

  • As soon as Hokes figured out that I was close to a certain person (my boyfriend), he continually insulted him and insisted I was leaking things to him, on top of a variety of other people with zero evidence, along with anyone else he disagreed with, including Scarlet and Unconfidence. Yeah, an actual witchhunt against people Hokes didn't like from someone who constantly cried 'WITCH' when it came to people Hokes didn't like disagreeing with them.

  • Hokes pushed an effort to allow no one to comment on the rule change (6), and not post the rules to the sidebar, insisting on a list of banned topics to be updated. Did I mention that Hokes pushed for the moratorium to protect someone after we'd have CP discussions continually without anyone objecting? Because, hey, what's an open discussion forum for both sides without a list of banned topics banned for questionable reasons whenever it's convenient for one side?

  • After Mudbunny said that Scarlet and I could stay in the off-site mod talk board in the non-mod topics, Hokes banned Scarlet for hosting a tell-all AMA where he exposed Hokes' behavior. Mudbunny didn't see the problem. More than that, the justification Hokes used for banning Scarlet wasn't even something that he said, but another user, and was merely about Judge stepping down. Yeah, not even on the scale of what I've told you guys, but Mudbunny wouldn't DARE try to do any of that shit to me in my thread, because deep down, he knows it's wrong.

  • The best part? Mudbunny just didn't check who had said what had gotten Scarlet banned. Hokes was just allowed to ban one of his critics for no reason, and Mudbunny saw no reason to be suspicious and never apologized for doing it. None of the other remaining mods gave a shit either. Hey, why should I be surprised?

You're fucking kidding me, Mudbunny, if you want to say that any mod did ANY of what you're claiming they did. Take some damn responsibility. Because you seemed to eager to do so here:

http://imgur.com/a/mK1GD

Yeah. No one did what Hokes did, and no one cared because they had no interest in holding anyone to account. What they did was deplorable, and the only crackdown was on anyone speaking out. You said that you would take responsibility, and you're still covering up for Hokes.

It's despicable.

I should have stopped Hokes from accusing those who disagreed with them as being part of a witch hunt. Sometimes, disagreement was simply a disagreement.

Yes, only sometimes, and Hokes only accused those who disagreed with them as being part of a witch hunt, not him creating an environment of constant baseless accusations of conspiracies, including continued efforts to name his critics as people leaking modmail content or doing the work of other users to the point where RaineyJ felt so beaten down and afraid to speak that she left silently, crying and feeling like no one ever cared about her contribution to the team. Oh, and only sometimes a disagreement was a disagreement.

You'll say to my face that I tried so hard to work with Hokes and that you failed as a top mod to let things happen this way, that you didn't step in and solve the problem, but around here, you're content to shove it under the rug, downplay it, and blatantly lie about what happened.

Fuck you.

. I should have stopped people trying to get Hokes disciplined for every minor thing that they do a lot sooner.

Oh yes, all of those things I listed? Minor things that everyone did, apparently. Not even remotely true, but hey, feel free to parrot what Hokes said in Slack yesterday and say it's your own opinion, despite it being entirely false.

[–]woxxon [スコア非表示]  (15子コメント)

For real, do you guys not realize how pathetic this vendetta looks? Jesus, you're leaking PM's and all, fucking deplorable. Like, consider the stakes, and the scope of what you're talking about, for one second.

[–]cha0sPro-GG [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

So what you're saying is you're making a big deal over nothing. Oh wait, double standards, right? Double standards.

[–]woxxon [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm making a big deal over nothing? I don't really follow..

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

I don't give a damn. When someone gets hurt and people JUSTIFY the hurt, defend the people who hurt them, those people deserve what's coming, and I'm going to do whatever I can to make sure everyone knows it.

[–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

I'd argue you're hurting your argument by straying from the more reserved but still very forceful initial resigning statement and diving headlong into a full bitter war over this.

that's been my reaction at least.

point where RaineyJ

this isn't the type of information i'd be comfortable sharing without their explicit agreement

[–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

They posted about it on my thread, and honestly, I'm caring less about being nice or polite or reserved when people get hurt and other people make excuses for it, cover it up, and refuse to take responsibility for it.

I know what you're saying, and I'm really not holding back anymore only because I've lost all respect for the staff and where the sub is going--censorship city--and the only reason I'm here, really, is to make sure that everyone knows what really went on. Because Mudbunny talked about how they would do that and take responsibility and all of this, and then blatantly DIDN'T.

Because you know what? I trusted Mudbunny to say shitty things about me that were true, admit the massive problems that went on, assign blame to where it belonged, and lay it all out there. I was going to come in here to say that yeah, I'm not blameless for fighting so hard or being so loose with my thoughts the other day, and that I'm happy that he decided to make an effort to be more open and honest.

But here I am, with that not happening, and with another person that I thought would be a good person turning out to just do this, and so why should I care?

[–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I'm caring less about being nice or polite or reserved when

I didn't actually say "I want you to be nice and polite and all that good stuff." I said "you're hurting your argument" at least in my eyes. That's important as i take your goal to be to convey information effectively (cue generic citation of yale professor kahan at culturalcognition) not simply vent. This additional stuff gives it more of a venting vibe which makes me more likely to discount it. my honest opinion.

obviously we can counter with concern troll allegations.

[–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]theonewhowillbeAmbassador for the Neutral Planet[M] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Rule 2.

    [–]TusconOfMagebathtub with novelty skull shaped faucets [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Fine. Edited.

    [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (14子コメント)

    You want to know what the rest of the team did yesterday? They justified what happened to her,

    Honestly, I still don't even know what happens, and I do consider that a problem.

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (13子コメント)

    Judge, you were there when it happened. I saw you talk. Why didn't you say anything? I know you, and I know this is a problem for you, but why not solve it?

    [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    I literally have no clue what you're talking about.

    Here's the thing with me and slack - it doesn't work on my work PC. Nearly all of my posting is done at work, which is why I make maybe 5 or 6 posts most weekends.

    So I have to slack on my phone. A Windows Phone, which means the Slack apps don't work much. And it's obvious when I'm not doing work, since my phone is in my hand.

    As a result, I miss a lot of stuff in slack. Sometimes I pop open the app and there are 200-300 unread messages in General. And the app starts me at the bottom without telling me how far up to scroll.

    On top of this, during redundant drama unlikely to get resolved my eyes would glaze over.

    So, honestly, no clue what happened. None. I thought Rainey was just a quiet mod, like so many others we've had. Or uninterested.

    This isn't an excuse, just an explanation. I reached out apologizing. Even not knowing what happened is awful and inexcusable enough.

    [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I like that when I say "I was wrong," someone comes in and calls me disingenuous.

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

    And you did something? You talk a HUGE GAME for someone that did fuck all to stop the toxic cesspit when you had a chance. Just flounce the fuck off already.

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

    Yeah, I did. I tried every day. That's what people complained about, that Scarlet, unconf, and I did what we could constantly to solve this, but we never could.

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

    Right, you tried so hard that you will be unable to point to a single public statement you made trying before you flounced the fuck off.

    Go ahead, show me.

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

    Why would it be in public?

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    So your "try[ing] so hard" was limited to whining in private?

    Why the fuck would anyone out here in the actual sub give a shit what was going on in your private toxic cesspool if it had no impact on this sub at all?

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    I'm not saying that it didn't. It certainly did have an impact on this subreddit, but public statements aren't the way for mods to resolve private issues. I'm not a mod anymore, so I don't care. Hell, I just want people to know what's going on, is all, so they're all on the up and up, because I VERY much think that this subreddit is about to go downhill fast.

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    What impact? Be specific, by pointing to any example. Any example at all. Go ahead.

    [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    The best part? Mudbunny just didn't check who had said what had gotten Scarlet banned. Hokes was just allowed to ban one of his critics for no reason, and Mudbunny saw no reason to be suspicious and never apologized for doing it. None of the other remaining mods gave a shit either. Hey, why should I be surprised?

    is scarlet banned?

    [–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    From our mod chat on slack, not from here

    [–]Mnhjk1 [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    I thought you'd left? If you're gonna flounce, flounce - if you want to stay and air your grievances, don't get our hopes up by telling us you're leaving. Your drama mongering has been far worse for this sub than 1000 Hokes'.

    [–]macinnebAnti-GG [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Your drama mongering has been far worse for this sub than 1000 Hokes'.

    To be fair I don't think Hokes gives a fuck, as where Bashluff very clearly cares very much.

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    And not giving a fuck is the worst sin of all, apparently.

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Mudbunny got my collaboration on this post because he asked and said that he was sorry and would be taking responsibility for all of the awfulness, as you've seen. I feel like it's worth weighing in, given that. I'm not participating in any other threads and this meta stuff related, because I'm telling you it's all bullshit.

    [–]razorbeamz [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    /u/Mudbunny, you're clearly being manipulated, if what Bash said is right. You should probably take some time to think about that.

    [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Razorbeamz, stop. No one is being manipulated. Mudbunny...I'm not pleased with Mudbunny right now, but Mudbunny's only fault is that he was too busy to do what he should have done, and hoped that people could resolve it themselves.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    OR you got no fucking clue what's going on and should stop backseat moderating. You should probably take some time to think about that.

    [–]razorbeamz [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    should stop backseat moderating

    Oh the irony of you saying that.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    You want me to go into the armchair psychology of your comment too?

    [–]Teuthex [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Did I mention that Hokes pushed for the moratorium to protect someone after we'd have CP discussions continually without anyone objecting? Because, hey, what's an open discussion forum for both sides without a list of banned topics banned for questionable reasons whenever it's convenient for one side?

    So much this.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (17子コメント)

    My only idea is make /u/Malky top mod.

    [–]MalkyThe fuck did I do? [スコア非表示]  (16子コメント)

    Who the fuck upvoted this.

    [–]HMRandCSOLOMON GRUNDY WANT FLAIR TOO [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I did. Drama Queen Extraordinaire, at your service. ;-)

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

    Not only did I upvote this, I'm going to break my extended hiatus to throw my support behind /u/Malky for top mod.

    Dunk gifs for everyone!

    [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    I don't think Dunk gifs should be banned, I think we should have a complex system to mitigate their damage.

    • If you only post a Dunk gif, you can't comment in that thread again or you will get a temporary ban of 32.7 hours.

    • If you post a Dank meme it must be in response to a Dunk gif.

    • Only 1 Dunk gif per thread is allowed, other Dunk gifs will be deleted unless they are actually Dank memes, then appropriate banning will be enforced.

    • Posting 3 Dank memes and no Dunk gifs will result in a 2 year temporary ban.

    • If you post a Dunk gif after a comment chain of 11 posts, you are exempt from these rules.

    • If you post a Dank meme after a comment chain of 7 posts, you will be permabanned for 3 hours.

    u/Malky is exempt from all rules except this one.

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Too many loopholes, these rules are ripe for abuse.

    Before posting any Dunk Gifs or Dank Gifs you have to disclose your gif-posting history, including any and all interactions with /r/DunkGifs, /r/DunkGifsInAction, and /r/DankGifs.

    Only after approval by a supermajority of mods should will you be allowed to post gifs, and only on a provisional basis until a period of no shorter than a fortnight has passed.

    It's the only way to prevent gif abuse.

    [–]HokesOneAnti-GG Mod | Misandrist Folk Demon [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    ilu bb

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Uh oh, you're gonna get me put on a list of Hokes-supporters.

    (Keep up the good work! HokesOne for President of Anti-GG!)

    [–]MalkyThe fuck did I do? [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    I thought we were friends.

    [–]Janvsanti-pickle [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Hey man, the ~24 hours when you were mod were the best this sub ever had.

    I believe in a thing called /u/Malky.

    [–]macinnebAnti-GG [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Wait... they made Malky a mod? And this sub wasn't replaced with a dunk gif?

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I think it was pre-dunk gif. It was like November or December last year.

    [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    people who think you're secretly nouri al maliki

    [–]ashye [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Looks like everyone who wanted a public mod fight is getting their wish.

    [–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Oh god, SRD here we come again

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    You need to stop having a secret backchannel unending mod discussion. You have a toxic cesspit back there that no one knows about. Perhaps stop doing that?

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    I like it better than the public cesspit that happened before it.

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Not that I think you're full of shit, but where exactly was that? Modmetadiscussions were never had in public.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Just the occasional flare up really, it was not a consistent toxic cesspit, but the cesspit showed toxicity in public often enough in like little slap fights between mods and what gets brought up in feedback threads.

    [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Those fights, held in public, dissipate, as everyone looks at you and says "flounce the fuck off, already."

    Those fights, held in private, fester, because no one has the balls to tell people to put up or shut up to their face on the garbage mod team here except for the witch hunt target of the day.

    [–]Predicted [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

    Remove all mods, add an even number of mods from both sides that have proven to argue intelligently for their side without ad hominem or hyperbole.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

    Remove all mods, add an even number of mods from both sides that have proven to argue intelligently for their side without ad hominem or hyperbole.

    You want stalemates? This is how you get stalemates. Because the 2 people that fit that definition probably still won't agree on a lot.

    [–]ashye [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    Mod a random number of users every day based on something random. Let Chaos Reign!

    [–]ALLAH_WAS_A_SANDWORM [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Why half measures? Give mod powers to everyone and anyone who has ever posted here. Then sit back, and enjoy the fireworks.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Let Chaos Reign!

    My first suggestion already covered that. :P

    [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    In my darker moments I suggest a day without mods, or a Butts topic that is wholly unmoderated (except for doxxing or threats.) Chaos indeed.

    [–]cha0sPro-GG [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Oh hell no, I'm washing my hands of this shitshow D:

    [–]BabaXIII [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    They aren't meant to agree, they are meant to debate. At the end of the day most debates aren't about the debaters themselves, but about the audience.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Debate? What? They need to enforce rules. They need to make decisions about what are the rules and when they enforce them. They need to work together to agree on the direction the sub should take. They're not mascots to do a little dance battle with each other for both teams to clap at, they're forum moderators. They talk in modmail or third party programs; they don't have an audience unless you want a thread for every "Does this violate rule 2?" with like 30 comments by mods and a bunch of nerds eating popcorn over "modfights".

    [–]BabaXIII [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Misread the comment and thought you were saying it would cause stalemate in the sub, as in the discussions. My bad.

    [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Oh, then sorry for being rather abrasive, I thought you were like in favor of turning this sub into like a panel of people to be watched debating instead of just being a normal forum which was terribly confusing and rather annoying as someone who hates how anyone treats this as more than a subreddit.

    [–]GhoostP [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Ban GamerGate discussion.

    Ban social justice discussion.

    Only imgur posts of empty cans of Pringles and further discussion of how good those Pringles probably tasted before they were gone.

    [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    If we have PringlesTM we need to allow the dunk gifs back for justice.

    [–]theonewhowillbeAmbassador for the Neutral Planet [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Pringles are shit tier crisps.

    [–]Cadfan17 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Honestly... I think everything is fine.

    Forum moderation seems reasonably effective given the situation. You know, acknowledging that perfect parity on a post by post level isn't possible when unreported posts are rarely reviewed and when multiple mods are applying subjective criteria.

    There doesn't seem to be any notable moderation bias. In that, very little is moderated away, and you can say pretty much whatever you want as long as your comment has substance.

    I couldn't care less about what the mods do on other subreddits as long as what happens there stays there.

    I also can't care less about mod on mod drama that doesn't affect actual moderation decisions in a way significant enough to notice.

    I think everything is pretty much fine, and those whining just want special privileges for their side, or special penalties for their enemies. So fuck 'em and keep on keeping on.

    [–]woxxon [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    I for one am all for shutting it right down. Most of the shit that comes up here is barely worth talking about, at least certainly not with the significant number of people that come here to stick their fingers in their ears and repeat their tired, horrible bullshit every day. Or at the very least, some ignorance-based rules should be enforced, where that kind of shit can't happen anymore and the people who make that their bread and butter won't be welcomed.

    *e: Actually, you know what

    We can cater to one side, and lose the other, or cater to none and lose both.

    I kinda can't believe this is being presented as a dilemma. I always forget that there's actually people who seem to legtimately think there's two equally valid sides to this thing. Like I'm actually taken aback sometimes, when faced with the realization that certain people actually think some kind of important or fruitful discussion is taking place here, with the kinds of people that overwhelmingly make up one side of the constituency. And they still constantly whine about how they get treated here, in a place that gives them faaaarrrr more consideration than is actually fair. The mistake this place makes is earnestly thinking gamergate points are worth addressing. I really don't think I can frequent or support a place that does that, anymore. It's been fun sticking my foot out in front of the toddlers running around throwing their tantrums, but if we're going to actually pretend like they have a point, I think I'm out.

    [–]Teuthex [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    Good, get gone. No one wants you here if all you're going to do is claim your side is right and demonize the people who disagree with you.

    [–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

    [removed]

      [–]TusconOfMagebathtub with novelty skull shaped faucets [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      No one wants you here

      Wrong.

      Have a nice day.

      [–]razorbeamz [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

      Do I take a hard line and pre-emptively ban those I see as the worst of the shitposters...those that toe the line and are clearly not here for any sort of conversation? (This is a group that includes both pros and antis, FWIW)

      Don't beat around the bush. Give us a list.

      [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

      Are you sure you want one?

      [–]razorbeamz [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

      I don't care if I'm on it or not. I'm done with this place, as we all should be.

      [–]BashfluffWonderful Pegasister [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

      Then go. Can you leave? Do you have it in you? I'm not sure.

      [–]razorbeamz [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      I'm still in this thread, but I'm certainly not going to participate outside it.

      If they want to ban me, more power to them.

      [–]HMRandCSOLOMON GRUNDY WANT FLAIR TOO [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      /u/Saint2e leaves, sub goes to shit. Who'd have thunk it? Thanks for going out with a bang, though!

      [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

      how about also a renewed dedication to getting rid of stuff that looks kinda like shitposts

      [–]razorbeamz [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

      The thing is, the mods here absolutely love shitposts, so long as what's being said meshes with their opinions.

      [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

      so long as what's being said meshes with their opinions.

      We allow shit posts on both sides, and we mod shit posts on both sides.

      The thing is, the users here absolutely love overanalyzing mod decisions, so long as what's being decided upon doesn't mesh with their opinions.

      [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

      We allow shit posts on both side

      waaaay to many shit posts on both sides

      Actually it reminds me of H.O.P.E. and Kleinman's book "when brute force fails"

      a semi-review http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/magazine/10prisons-t.html

      Classical deterrence theory has long held that the threat of a mild punishment imposed reliably and immediately has a much greater deterrent effect than the threat of a severe punishment that is delayed and uncertain. Recent work in behavioral economics has helped to explain this phenomenon: people are more sensitive to the immediate than the slightly deferred future and focus more on how likely an outcome is than how bad it is. In the course of implementing HOPE, Alm discovered another reason why the strategy works: people are most likely to obey the law when they’re subject to punishments they perceive as legitimate, fair and consistent, rather than arbitrary and capricious. “When the system isn’t consistent and predictable, when people are punished randomly, they think, My probation officer doesn’t like me, or, Someone’s prejudiced against me,” Alm told me, “rather than seeing that everyone who breaks a rule is treated equally, in precisely the same way.”

      without clear consistent enforcement of no shitposts rules people are going to feel the one time in a hundred their post is deleted is due to an unfair mod action.

      [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

      I'm coming around to that.

      While I tend to let R1s pass if they continue the conversation, or if it is ignored by the person it is aimed at and doesn't escalate things, I let it pass. Maybe we need a hard crackdown.

      I tend to let R2s pass when they're still making a point, just poorly. I'll sometimes make people flesh them out,but usually I'll let people make their points.

      Maybe it's time to stop that. I can think of one user who will never have a post get through. Maybe it's time to crack down.

      At the same time, while it may make people shape up, I think a huge amount would instead decide to ship out.

      [–]TusconOfMagebathtub with novelty skull shaped faucets [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

      Maybe we need a hard crackdown.

      Yes. And better rules, like "No trolling with PRATTs".

      [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      what are pratts? I haven't seen andy dwyer Burt Maclin around here.

      [–]TusconOfMagebathtub with novelty skull shaped faucets [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Points Refuted a Thousand Times, like "sex for reviews" or "dem SJWs want to censorsheep your games!!"

      [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Oh come on now. You turned shit posting into an art. This would hurt all of us.

      [–]DanyLektro [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      /u/mudbunny,

      Regardless of where you go from here and regardless of what your opinion on the matter is, I think that bringing the positions of the major players in this to the sub in what is clearly a problem that at least some, if not a majority of the community feels it should be involved with discussing, was a good decision.

      As for your opinion and regarding what should be done, I think the two best options that you've suggested might end up polarizing the community.

      I like this:

      Do I continue as is, and hope that this post is enough of a spotlight on responsibility that people change?

      ...because I like to think that people can generally be open-minded and interested in discussion.

      But I like this:

      Do I take a hard line and pre-emptively ban those I see as the worst of the shitposters...those that toe the line and are clearly not here for any sort of conversation?

      because I don't trust them to be.

      The worst part about the first option is that it allows those who ruin discussion but bring just enough to the table to justify sticking around to roam free.

      The worst part about the second option is that sometimes discussion blossoms in adversity. Some of the best discussions I've had here came from pointing out that I had some issues with somebody's crass and overgeneralizing statement (though not always from the person themselves).

      I don't know what you're going to do, I don't know what the community wants to do and the thread is still kind of blowing up with discussion about the situation rather than the solution, but those are the two best options I see, with pros and cons to each of them.

      [–]YourMomsRedditAccout [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      where does the sub go from here?

      I think Jim Sterling (thank god for him) said it best:

      "Grow up...and fuck off."

      [–]Exmond [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Its been very difficult to have good discussions in this sub. Especially with the recent implementation of Rule 6, in which one of the mods said it was in direct response to what has been going on with Nyberg.

      Thats terrible and very.. reactionary. I don't think the sub can operate like that when one side is very sensitive to claims of censorship (And it gets worse when one side can bring up examples of when Rule 6 could of been implemented earlier)

      There are a few trolls in this sub and when I see their responses (OH am i hurting your GG fee fees) I am amazed as how they haven't been banned yet.

      I think this sub needs to take a hard line and implement their rules. I am against pre-preemptively banning people but I think if people break the rules (and break them often, like 3 times) they should be given a temporary ban.

      As for the mods we need mods on both sides of the spectrum but also mods that will don't demonize the other side. Hokes in particular seems to be proud of the way they demonize GG. Either get all netural mods that are not invested in GG in the slightest, get mods that know how a debate structure work or get the extremist mods out (From both sides)

      I have learned a lot of things in this sub. I just wish it was a lot easier to get a reasonable discussion happening.

      [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (40子コメント)

      There is no good option.

      Boot Hokes and the pro-GG people will find a new witch-hunt, it's the modus operandi of gamergate.

      Keep Hokes and the pro-GG people will continue their witch-hunt until Hokes does something actually worthy of demodding in the eyes of the whole community, not just the blatantly biased witch-hunters ,and that will justify the witch-hunt in those peoples eyes like every other situation where they throw shit at the wall until something sticks.

      both options leads to more shitting up this sub with witch-hunting bullshit.

      This topic was never going to have healthy debate, because "gamergate" itself is unhealthy obsessive level garbage on all fronts. People are losing their god damn minds over the mod drama in a sub with 50 active uses on average. It's so ridiculous all I can do is laugh at it and all the people who take it as seriously as they do.

      So I say either say fuck it, let the whiners leave and leave the sub as is, no one is ever going to be satisfied and this was never going to be a serious place for discussion anyway, not with this topic, and not with this sub name. The people who want to argue will come back, the people leaving are "to scared for debate" anyway.

      Or shut it down and start a sub unrelated to GG that you guys can mod, and nothing of value will be lost.

      where does the sub go from here?

      The net is vast and infinite. What ever happens, it's been "fun" so far.

      [–]namelessbananaBye Felicia [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      Will Hokes be our Pao?

      [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Hokes was actually trying to save us all along!

      [–]woxxon [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

      It's so ridiculous all I can do is laugh at it and all the people who take it as seriously as they do.

      I really wouldn't believe it, if I wasn't watching it unfold in front of me.

      [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

      We are breaking 90 users right now, and that's only because all the whiners are running to KiA and posting about this sub. This place is just another platform for GG to either spout it's bullshit, or pretend to be victimized by.

      [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

      Weve become the new focus of gg it seems. Ghazi almost moved onto mostly non-GG content at this point so yelling at them doesnt get gg anywhere. So we are the new target. I mean ffs we have a sticky on kia. What is wrong with people

      [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      Ya that washed away any respect I had for Scarlett whatever. I mean i never really respected their opinion on GG, but i thought they were a fine mod. That post was literally "hey yall go brigade this sub I am mad at" level crap tho.

      [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Oh look we are the #1 KiA post again. What the fuck is going on?

      [–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      This is the reason why I've been barely active the last month and a half (well I'm also back to school & still working full time, but still)

      [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Everyone backed away for a bit, and users noticed how much slower we got.

      [–]beethovens_ear_horn [スコア非表示]  (18子コメント)

      It appears two mods have been driven out by the toxicity in the mod team.

      [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (15子コメント)

      Two mods who already had a bias agaisnt another mod for some time before and during modding.

      [–]namelessbananaBye Felicia [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

      You have no idea! They made it pretty clear.

      [–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      Yea that was even explicitly part of the reason why they agreed to join the mod team

      [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      I remember all that, it was dumb idea. Either they would get rid of Hokes like they wanted, or this debacle would happen.

      [–]beethovens_ear_horn [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

      Just as likely is one mod who is paranoid and sees enemies in the mod team.

      [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

      No, I mean I was there watching the witch-hunting as it happened time and time again, and remember who was involved. This isn't a case where these things are mutually exclusive, there were witch hunts and Hokes is paranoid, just more justifiably since there were actual "enemies" or whatever involved.

      [–]beethovens_ear_horn [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

      If paranoia were justifiable by the witch hunt, could the witch hunt be justifiable by similar reasoning like there being actual instances of rule breaking by the mod?

      [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

      No, because breaking the rules doesn't justify a witch-hunt. It might have caused the witch-hunt, but it doesn't actually justify it.

      Paranoia isn't actually justified either, if my point didn't get a across. It just makes sense for someone who is actively being witch-hunted to be paranoid.

      [–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      Make that 3

      [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Make it 4, I got out because I saw this toxicity happening from a mile away, I just had the good sense to get out before the storm.

      [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      50

      though the past week or so has seen about double that on average.

      [–]ShodenOne Man Army [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Due to mod drama and the Sarah stuff mostly. It spikes and mellows.

      [–]HylarV [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Boot Hokes and the pro-GG people will find a new witch-hunt, it's the modus operandi of gamergate. Keep Hokes and the pro-GG people will continue their witch-hunt until Hokes does something actually worthy of demodding in the eyes of the whole community, not just the blatantly biased witch-hunters ,and that will justify the witch-hunt in those peoples eyes like every other situation where they throw shit at the wall until something sticks.

      We should take a page from the Anti playbook. You guys are so much more elegant in this. :(

      [–]IronShoggoth [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Due to the nature of the conflict around the whole subject of GG, nobody in this sub wants a debate, they want to chew out the opposing sides. Either relax the rules so that people can take their gloves off or just close it.

      This sub won't be cleaned up until the whole situation around gamergate suddenly becomes cordial. Until that happens the fallout will end up here.

      Which was fine until one mod decided that one of their favourite topics in regards to "things GG dun" was off limits once one of their buddies was implicated. So apparently it's both useless as a discussion forum and as thunderdome.

      [–]middlekelly [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      I'm probably not one to talk, as I've never posted here before. I've lurked and read a handful of posts here, and the users come off as aggressive. I've said this before- specifically to the moderator Unconfidence- that this subreddit has a pair of noble goals, in being a place for healthy discussions and seeing people as people, not as just another cog in a hivemind.

      Reading some posts here, it doesn't look like that would actually happen, and my solution has been to just stay away. I'd very much like to have an honest discussion, but as an outsider, it doesn't seem like people would take my posts in good faith nor does it seem like anything could be actually accomplished by talking.

      Part of that is due to timing: this has been going on for over a year, and people very much have made up their minds, and unfortunately, this paints both sides as walking stereotypes repeating the same tired arguments over and over again.

      But again, this is just me commenting as a total outsider. I like the idea of the sub, but it's execution has kept me away.

      [–]SenouNeutral [スコア非表示]  (15子コメント)

      There is no silver bullet in this case.

      I've said it before but I think a good first step is to cull the posters that just post snark and point scoring one liners. Give them a warning and ban on the first repeated offense no questions asked.

      EDIT: I mean for god's sake there are even jokes about the posting of dunk gifs.

      [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      I've said it before but I think a good first step is to cull the posters that just post snark and point scoring one liners. Give them a warning and ban on the first repeated offense no questions asked.

      Then nobody comes here. This topic is entirely focused on by people who love shitposting and gotchas and emotional arguments and pseudo-intellectuals who are "above" a lot of the emotions and love to ponder the politics of it all and then variations on those two themes. Pseudo-intellectuals got nothing if the other people don't show up, and we get /r/outofgaming which, sadly, is a practically dead sub.

      [–]SenouNeutral [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      I agree that doing this would decrease the population of the sub significantly but disagree that it'd be a total wash. If you ask around the people that regularly post/lurk the sub they'd be able to identify most of the key shitposters/gotcha-seekers because they're beyond obvious & consistent (albeit with a fair amount of bias depending on the "side" they're on).

      Similarly - I'm fairly sure there are a selection of posters that the majority can agree are reasonable and participate in discussion in good faith. (Again - albeit with bias)

      [–]razorbeamz [スコア非表示]  (12子コメント)

      Then there would be no mods left here!

      [–]SenouNeutral [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

      Ha!

      Seriously though I really don't get why they have a rule 2 if it's not actively enforced.

      There's so much shitposting and its ruining the quality of the sub

      <several minutes later>

      Someone reported this for rule 2 but I'm letting it slide

      [–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Seriously though I really don't get why they have a rule 2 if it's not actively enforced.

      I wish I could enforce it the way I want, everything would be gone in this thread except for Bash's comment tree

      [–]StolenHodor2 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      rule 2 if it's not actively enforced.

      Rule 2 is only actively enforced against people who are opposed to GamerGate.

      [–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

      ಠ_ಠ

      (but seriously, let's try to keep this thread serious)

      [–]baaliscoming [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      how do you make that face?

      [–]SpawnzerReSpekt my authoritah! [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      &#3232;_&#3232;

      You can also install RES and add it as a macro for quick shitposting

      Alternatively there's the "source" button (added by RES I think) that let's you see the formating of my post

      [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

      Razor, I know you believe I think you're one of the worst posters here. I don't. I think you refuse to listen and endlessly fight demons that only exist in your head, and you'd have a much better go of things if you listened instead of trying to "put 2 and 2 together," something that seems to keep you constantly fighting.

      But, how many times are you going to "quit" for a few days, or tell us all how terrible we are? It gets tiring. The drama.

      I would like to cull all the annoying low effort snark and one liner people. Yes, a good majority of them are AGG, but a lot of the AGGers accused of this also make lengthier posts. A good chunk of GGers, though, fall into that.

      GGers, in particularly, seem obsessed with the drama. Obsessed. It's what fuels you guys. You came to GG to be angry. You come here to be angry. You just need the drama. Some of those people are terrible and need to go.

      Razor, you don't have to be terrible. I think you often choose to, but I'd prefer you instead stop imagining people are saying things and instead just pay attention to what they say. You'd be a great contributor if you did this. A great one.

      [–]jabberwockxenoPro-GG [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      I haven't been here in like 2 months, can I get a tl;dr of what this is all about? I can gather bits and pieces from the post, of course, but I feel like i'm missing a lot.

      Anyways, my views have always been that rules 1 and 2 need to be enforced better. There's far too many posts that are just insulting or sarcastic or are just making a hostile statement, or aren't actually responding to the points of the person they are responding to. In short, they aren't actually discussing anything or are open to back and forth discussion.

      Also, last time I was here, there were a lot of topics/posts being submitted and accepted that were poorly made and extremely biased. I say be stricter about what you guys approve.

      [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSMakes Your Games [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Long and short of it this has been going along for a long ass time.

      Hokes is very strong in their opinions. A lot of people here didn't like the fact that their is mod that thinks GG is pretty much the Anti-Christ (eggageration for effect). So for as long as i can remember there has been a decent sized group of people trying to get hokes removed from the mod possition. Well a few of these people were on and joined the mod team and all hell broke loose. Hokes seeing this whole collective effort to remove them became kind of paranoid (from what I understand) and became more inflammatory and confrontational, which only served to rial up the anti-Hokes brigade. Which fired up Hokes more, which fired up the brigade and on and on and on.

      And here we are. The breaking point I guess.

      Its all stupid.

      [–]MrWigglesworth2I'm right, you're wrong. [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      To be blunt, they feel that it is almost entirely (to the point the exceptions prove the rule) made up of pro-GG people who are unhappy that Hokes is not in the slightest bit shy in sharing their opinions on Gamergate and gamergaters.

      Neither is /u/judgeholden72. But his posts don't usually break the rules by consisting of nothing but insults. And on the odd occasion that they do, he doesn't go around warning people for responding to him kind, rigidly enforcing the rule he just broke himself. I also am not seeing multiple former mods talk about judge's totalitarian behavior behind the scenes... ostensibly because it doesn't happen.

      And wouldn't you know it, I haven't seen anyone calling for judge's head here, despite him very clearly being no fan of GG. I'm sure it's happened, but it doesn't appear to be popular idea, and I would personally oppose it. In fact, I'd say he and the other anti-mods, as much as I may disagree with their opinions, generally do a good job given the circumstances. If anyone starts calling for their heads as well, I'll oppose it. You can screen cap that. I'll oppose it because this place requires good moderators from both sides to function. If I wanted an all pro circlejerk I'd go to KiA... but I probably make 100 comments in here for every comment I make in KiA, because I generally dislike circlejerks.

      But this why I don't buy /u/HokesOne 's witch hunt defense. If my, or others, interest were merely in chasing off the most vehemently anti-gg mods, then hokes would not be the sole target of this supposed witch hunt. And yet, here we are. Hokes is a target because they regularly and repeatedly and flagrently breaks rules. Every other mod has broken rules too at some point. Hell, every regular poster here, myself included, has broken rules. But no other mod does it so habitually and brazenly... and frankly, most rule 1/2 violations I've seen come at the tail end of a long and heated argument, not in the opening salvo. This behavior is bad enough on its own, but the fact that it comes from someone who is supposed to enforce rules against it... and who rigidly does so with people other than themselves... makes it particularly unacceptable.

      I don't know if hokes needs to go altogether, but they certainly need some sort of censure, because this behavior coming from a mod needs to stop.

      [–]Teuthex [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      You need to start over with a new mod team.

      [–]petey1214 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      This sub is done. You've lost any notion of good faith when you slanted the rules one way. Good luck.

      [–]beethovens_ear_horn [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

      • Top mod should be a recruited neutral with no postings in KiA/Ghazi or related subs
      • Guidelines for mod removal should be defined clearly
      • Mod impeachment, voting procedures, as well as veto powers should be outlined

      "Recruited" means instead of taking applications from people who are enthusiastic to get the power to do something here, you go out and asking parties uninterested in GG -- for example asking someone from a wildlife or sports subreddit.

      As for impeachment, I'd be happy with something like: 1) Impeachment brought forward by any mod, 2) Decision made through public vote in thread 3) Neutral top mod has power to veto.

      [–]apinkgayelephantThe Worst Former Mod [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

      "Recruited" means instead of taking applications from people who are enthusiastic to get the power to do something here, you go out and asking parties uninterested in GG -- for example asking someone from a wildlife or sports subreddit.

      "Get someone who doesn't give a shit about this mess but is totally gonna care about the sub." is not the best or most probable advice for shaking up the mod team, just saying.

      [–]judgeholden72 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

      I'd give people with no stake in GG 2 days before they quit.

      You need someone with a stake but no strong passion, or capable of berlin walling themselves.

      [–]beethovens_ear_horn [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

      Someone who acts like the Supreme Court. They don't need to actually spend time moderating any topics, they would be called upon to decide the constitutionality, if you will, of behavior or decisions made by lower mods.