I know this is the shittiest effort in the justification olympics ever, but this STILL doesn’t make any senseLegs are generally big open surface areas. She’s wearing tights. She could pretty easily swap top with bottom and wear a perfectly normal shirt with a skirt and still have just as much bare skin.Why is she wearing tights? Why are they partly ripped? If she was taking this seriously, ie, As Much Visible Skin As Possible, why not short shorts?? Why one huge glove, covering up most of one arm? That is clearly not ‘as little as possible’ by their own design. Shorts would make sense, ripped tights and a bikini top make her look like a gritty stereotype sex worker.Why the goddamn fancy bra? Like for real? There’s a ribbon on it? Isn’t she a spy or some shit? She could be wearing a comfy sports bra with no difference to surface area of skin levels. That bikini is not something you could move in even slightly without your boobs flying out. The only thing she could reasonably do is sit quietly in the corner.Just the immediately obvious alternatives to this - she could wear something perfectly functional and STILL HAVE THE SAME AMOUNT OF BARE SKINShe could even wear a fucking floor-length skirt. Do men realise that just because you can’t SEE parts of a woman’s body, they still exist and are still in contact with the air??? You know what’s LESS condusive to that? TIGHTSThe sheer amount of bullshit to this like they didn’t go ‘okay fuck whatever we said about her photosynthesizing, put her in a really tiny fancy bra and ripped up sheer hosiery, cover half her arm with a long-ass glove, don’t hire a voice actor bc she’s literally only there for me to get off to. ok I can jerk to this now, start producing the squishable boobie figurines’Fuck dude, we’re used to video games being sexist, we already know this. We sigh and reach down inside ourselves and steel our resolve to TRY and enjoy gaming when we see the new depths and the amount of money and wasted talent that goes on Titty Physics and all besides. But actually putting forth this justification as if it means ANYTHING, like ANYONE will see this as somehow acceptable now, it’s a new level of insulting. Fucking hell, even that fake leak from 4chan that said ‘it’s because of nanomachines housed in her boobs’ made more fucking sense.

I know this is the shittiest effort in the justification olympics ever, but this STILL doesn’t make any sense

  • Legs are generally big open surface areas. She’s wearing tights. She could pretty easily swap top with bottom and wear a perfectly normal shirt with a skirt and still have just as much bare skin.
  • Why is she wearing tights? Why are they partly ripped? If she was taking this seriously, ie, As Much Visible Skin As Possible, why not short shorts?? Why one huge glove, covering up most of one arm? That is clearly not ‘as little as possible’ by their own design. Shorts would make sense, ripped tights and a bikini top make her look like a gritty stereotype sex worker.
  • Why the goddamn fancy bra? Like for real? There’s a ribbon on it? Isn’t she a spy or some shit? She could be wearing a comfy sports bra with no difference to surface area of skin levels. That bikini is not something you could move in even slightly without your boobs flying out. The only thing she could reasonably do is sit quietly in the corner.
  • Just the immediately obvious alternatives to this - she could wear something perfectly functional and STILL HAVE THE SAME AMOUNT OF BARE SKIN
  • She could even wear a fucking floor-length skirt. Do men realise that just because you can’t SEE parts of a woman’s body, they still exist and are still in contact with the air??? You know what’s LESS condusive to that? TIGHTS
  • The sheer amount of bullshit to this like they didn’t go ‘okay fuck whatever we said about her photosynthesizing, put her in a really tiny fancy bra and ripped up sheer hosiery, cover half her arm with a long-ass glove, don’t hire a voice actor bc she’s literally only there for me to get off to. ok I can jerk to this now, start producing the squishable boobie figurines’

Fuck dude, we’re used to video games being sexist, we already know this. We sigh and reach down inside ourselves and steel our resolve to TRY and enjoy gaming when we see the new depths and the amount of money and wasted talent that goes on Titty Physics and all besides.

But actually putting forth this justification as if it means ANYTHING, like ANYONE will see this as somehow acceptable now, it’s a new level of insulting. Fucking hell, even that fake leak from 4chan that said ‘it’s because of nanomachines housed in her boobs’ made more fucking sense.

Tags: usually I'd just reblog the funny parodies and whatever but just the arrogance of expecting people to believe she's 'naked for the plot' msg v quiet fucking ''quiet'' go to hell