上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]logicalnoise 2015ポイント2016ポイント  (1127子コメント)

He said it himself that he took a clock apart and was messing with it.

[–]Consloe_Prot 879ポイント880ポイント  (927子コメント)

The point this video is making is that he didn't "mess with it" at all beyond putting the insides into an awkward case.

[–]ToeTacTic 664ポイント665ポイント  (776子コメント)

Someone said in the original thread that he did exactly that and got downvoted for it

[–]most_low 52ポイント53ポイント  (3子コメント)

It was like the third or fourth top comment when I went there.

[–]0fficerNasty 323ポイント324ポイント  (765子コメント)

Of course they did. Because Reddit already painted him as a victim of "the man" who wants to keep smart muslims down.

[–]mynameisalso 714ポイント715ポイント  (190子コメント)

Of course they did. Because Reddit already painted him as a victim of "the man" who wants to keep smart muslims down.

How is he not? No shit he didn't invent a digital clock. He put clock bits into a different case. He said himself it took him 20 minutes to do it. That isn't the issue. The issue is that they illegally questioned a minor. And let's not pretend Texas gives two fucks about safety. They put ammonium nitrate factories right next to schools.

There is nothing bomb like about this. Any adult should know that. It has nothing in it that looks like explosives.

[–]Fuckzeltasgarden 215ポイント216ポイント  (70子コメント)

Having messed with improvised explosives while serving in Iraq, I can say that you never know what they're going to look like. A quick examination of the clock would reveal that it was harmless, but you can't say that there is nothing bomb like about it.

[–]Edril 263ポイント264ポイント  (27子コメント)

And yet the teachers didn't evacuate the school or call in the bomb squad. They put the "bomb" in their desk drawer, continued classes as usual and just called regular police officers who took the device with them in their police car and kept it in the evidence locker.

These are not the actions of people who think this is a bomb.

[–]twogreenvials 12ポイント13ポイント  (3子コメント)

They said they thought it was a 'hoax bomb'.

[–]mrpoopybutthoe 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yeah.... however by their definition, anything electronic is a hoax bomb.

[–]I_RAPE_CAT_RAPISTS_ 52ポイント53ポイント  (8子コメント)

These are not the actions of people who think this is a bomb

Not a legitimate bomb, after opening the case. What it does look like however, is a fake bomb. Kids have been fucked over for far, far less. While it's true that the rights violations shouldn't have happened, you can't think that a fake bomb (regardless of whether that was Ahmed's intention or not) is something that will slide in zero tolerance places.

[–]Goonred 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

The anger here on reddit is zero tolerance policy based.

People are angry that zero tolerance has led to this and it's only made worse because it's not just a popsicle gun shaped suspension or a finger shape gun it's a kid that brought in his own 'invention' wearing a NASA shirt.

Now that the argument has turned to whether it was an invention or whether it looked like a clock or not, the anger for zero tolerance policy has been pushed aside.

[–]lackofcommitme 3ポイント4ポイント  (6子コメント)

The most nonsense things I've been seeing is people saying how bombs never have timers or tick, that it's only a Hollywood thing.

[–]mbibbles 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

If you never know what a bomb is going to look like, then how is everything not bomb-like.

[–]TwoJointJaxon 48ポイント49ポイント  (33子コメント)

I laughed out-loud when I saw the clock, because it looks like the stereotypical hollywood bomb in my opinion. I am not saying the schools actions were justified and frankly I dont know enough..buuuuut it seems suspicious, as if it was supposed to look like a bomb to just enough people to cause a scare.

[–]Impune 43ポイント44ポイント  (29子コメント)

I am not saying the schools actions were justified and frankly I dont know enough...

The thing is, even if Ahmed meant for it to look like a bomb, the school reacted in a way that suggests they knew it wasn't a bomb, but put him through hell anyway.

When I was in 5th or 6th grade there was a bomb scare at my school. Someone called, said there was a bomb, and do you know what happened?

  • Every single class was evacuated.

  • All students and staff were lead away from the building, to line up in a nice, orderly fashion across the football field -- putting us a safe distance between us and the school.

  • The police and (I presume) the bomb squad were called.

What happened in Ahmed's case:

  • He was pulled into the principal's office -- with the "bomb".

  • The police came to the school to arrest him. No staff or students were evacuated.

  • No bomb squad was called.

  • He was taken to the detention center, and the cops took the "bomb" with them in their squad car.

Shit just doesn't add up. I don't care if the kid put on a turban, grew a beard, and shouted "Allahu akbar!" as he presented his clock. The school either (a) knew it wasn't a bomb and put the kid in jail, or (b) handled what they perceived to be a legitimate threat in the most negligent way possible.

[–]nrubin999 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

Nobody thought that the device was a bomb. That isn't why he was detained. He was detained for a "hoax bomb offense", or someone who "knowingly manufactures, sells, purchases, transports, or possesses a hoax bomb with intent to use it to intentionally cause alarm or reaction." Texas Penal Code 46.08. They didn't evacuate the building and call the bomb squad because they never saw it as a threat... So yes, the school "(a) knew it wasn't a bomb and put the kid in jail" for the hoax bomb offense.

[–]koraido 20ポイント21ポイント  (8子コメント)

I thought that he didn't get in trouble for making a "bomb" but because he brought a fake bomb to school. Which a clock on a case like this could easily be understood to be. Even one of the officers said it looked like a "movie bomb". So I had no problem with him getting taken into the office and it confiscated but the whole suspended and Juvenal detention time is not needed. Also the illegal questioning. Did you guys actually read the stories?

[–]PatrickPlan8 23ポイント24ポイント  (2子コメント)

its the two hours of an police interrogation at school and then at the police station without his parents when he asked for his parents and denying him the right to call his parents that is the real problem beyond school fear mongering.

[–]Heartless000 22ポイント23ポイント  (6子コメント)

Dude if I came to a school with a bag of oregano and got arrested would you feel bad because I was a poor misunderstood foodie? Some diamond in the rough castoff Master Chef that the school just didn't understand?

What everyone is trying to say, is that he did something that looked suspicious as fuck, and not as to his race, but just in general really shady.

[–]TotallyHarmless 12ポイント13ポイント  (6子コメント)

If I needed to make a bomb prop for a Halloween costume, I'd mount a digital count-down clock into an attache case. You know, like this or this

[–]elsparx 1738ポイント1739ポイント  (542子コメント)

Are people seriously looking for reasons to shit on a kid who got a bullshit "fake bomb hoax" slapped on him, cuffed and questioned by police?

This fucking website sometimes.

Edit: You people are insane.

[–]rumpumpumpum 775ポイント776ポイント  (200子コメント)

I don't think anyone is trying to shit on the kid, they're trying to shit on the media who called him a "genius" like as if he'd built this clock from scratch.

[–]sugarlich12 395ポイント396ポイント  (70子コメント)

I don't think anyone is trying to shit on the kid, they're trying to shit on the media who called him a "genius" like as if he'd built this clock from scratch.

The very video we're discussing flat out claims that the device was deliberately constructed to make it look suspicious. That isn't a criticism of the media, it's a conspiracy theory. And it's shitting on the kid.

From that, numerous highly up-voted comments in this thread are claiming that it shows or implies that the kid's father basically set him up to be a victim in order to further...some nefarious agenda. It's a bit vague, but the important point seems to be that this can't possibly be an example of anti-Muslim bigotry in America, therefore it must be something that is exploiting the belief that such any thing exists.

[–]rundmcarlson 55ポイント56ポイント  (29子コメント)

Well it would be a little less legitimate if it didn't turn out that his father is part of an activist group and has perpetrated many public stunts for his cause.

The kid also states that he put a cord on it to make it look less suspicious, so he knew it looked suspicious. He was also told my one of his teachers not to show the device to other teachers and he proceeded to.

The local PD is likely making a big stink to prevent kids from bringing anything that could cause alarm to schools, just like when they try to charge a kid with child porn for having naked pictures of himself on his phone. Its not meant to actually charge the kid, its meant to scare kids away from doing stupid things that can get them in trouble. Its not a racial thing. I have been in trouble with the police several times for home experiments, and have even been harassed by TSA for things in nice 3D printed cases and I am as white as they come. Authorities are very sensitive to potential mass killing devices because of our country's history, and why anyone would question that seems nuts to me. Having experienced this type of police reaction myself, I can say it seems to be a sensitivity to any unknown dangerous looking object. Cops are also incredibly aggressive and harsh when people may have a weapon. Watch an episode of cops and see how loud and rude sounding they get shouting at people to get down and put their hands on their head. Its because they are in a dangerous situation unless they can prove otherwise. Once they saw that the thing was harmless, the next question was why the hell would someone make something like this, and why would a normally developed teenager not realize it looked suspicious. The answer is either that the kid is very naive or that he purposely did it (whether under his own decision or someone's instruction). They want kids to know this is not something that will be tolerated.

[–]fpsfreak 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

So the kid is not saying he's genius, but the media does. Right. I'm sorry but that's not what the video seems to be pointing at.

[–]TripleSkeet 10ポイント11ポイント  (11子コメント)

Would building a clock from scratch make you a genius?

[–]sighinide 15ポイント16ポイント  (4子コメント)

Depends on how "from scratch" you mean. But generally something like a digital clock is "basic" enough to be covered in a high school microelectronics class (my brother took one such course and made a stopwatch).

That being said, most kids don't do stuff like this on their own.

[–]Liberteez 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

ONe tiny bit of mitigation for the overreaction by authority: there had actually been a bomb scare the Friday previous (9/11) at a Plano high school. That threat actually did scare quite a few people and cause disruption.
They never thought Ahmed had an actual explosive device. The interrogation was an attempt to intimidate into admitting he brought in the device to get a rise out of people...

[–]acidfreepaper 40ポイント41ポイント  (0子コメント)

"i'm the special genius, me! How dare he." -reddit

[–]Supernyan 106ポイント107ポイント  (101子コメント)

Supposedly this is politically charged because his dad is running for office. His dad's supposed intention was to have his son play victim, so the father could appear persecuted.

[–]natmccoy 16ポイント17ポイント  (4子コメント)

You're all wrong. The father is actually Richard Heene, this is his latest media-oriented performance art, he's gotten a lot better since the 2009 balloon boy hoax.

[–]btr154 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

The fact that this video got so many upvotes is cringeworthy...

[–]PBanimation 44ポイント45ポイント  (7子コメント)

Wait, so its ok that he was arrested for bringing his clock to school because he didn't build it from scratch? Who cares? That's never been what this is about. No one is questioning his engineering skills. People are questioning why he got arrested for bringing something as basic as a god-damn clock to school. How does the fact that the clock was more of a case for the internals of a regular clock mean that he isn't a victim for being arrested for bringing it to school? Or in your words "Because Reddit already painted him as a victim of "the man" who wants to keep smart Muslims down.". I honestly trying to think of a way you could have come to that conclusion, but I'm at a loss.

[–]most_low 329ポイント330ポイント  (71子コメント)

That is messing with it. Jesus! If a 9th grader unscrews the back of an electronic device and fucks around with it, rearranges the parts, and it still works, that's great!

And no, he's not a FRAUD for calling it an "invention". He's a teenager using the word wrong. Just like you aren't a FRAUD when you say to your kids "let's do a science experiment" before making a vinegar and baking soda volcano, even though it's really a "demonstration" and not an experiment at all. It's ok to use words leniently when you are trying to make science interesting to children.

It's ok that his dad says "wow what a cool invention" even though all he did was take a clock apart and put it back together in a different case.

[–]konaitor 28ポイント29ポイント  (3子コメント)

This (thinking that tweaking something = inventing it) is what happens when you watch too many Apple product launches.

[–]jessicamshannon 56ポイント57ポイント  (6子コメント)

But, that's still messing with it. Anyway that's beside the point. Kid got arrested for bringing a 2 dollar clock to school. I feel like saying it's a "fraud" is misleading because it's implying that the stuff that happened to that kid didn't actually happen. He did get arrested for a clock and he never made it out to be some kind of threat- that all happened. It's not as if people are outraged that they arrested a genius. People are outraged because they arrested a kid for bringing a clock to school.

[–]34679 88ポイント89ポイント  (22子コメント)

He's 14. Kids that age call drawings inventions.

[–]KingWithoutBurgers 230ポイント231ポイント  (99子コメント)

Here is the clock in question: a MICRONTA 63-765A Digital Alarm Clock with Battery Backup. The circuitry inside A.M.'s device matches perfectly with what you would expect from this clock; aside from the obvious red four-number seven-segment display:

  • There's a blue 9V DC 'Battery Backup' snap clip connector (visible to the left of the smaller PCB in the image of the device; the connector looks like this)

  • The larger PCB has a fairly visible set of buttons on its top face (looking like silver circles or bumps) matching the control buttons of the clock (one on the far left = large 'snooze' button on clock; four smaller buttons offset-left from mid = 'hour', 'time', 'min', and 'alarm' buttons on clock, etc.

  • The size of the clock, about 8" in length, matches the size of the 'metal briefcase'-style pencil cases that they sell cheap in department stores; this one on Amazon is pretty standard at a little over 8" in length, and matches the features pretty closely, minus maybe the clasp (although that was brought up in at least one interview with A.M. as having been modified anyway).

[–]Gfrisse1 94ポイント95ポイント  (79子コメント)

What precisely is your point here?

[–]Cidician 181ポイント182ポイント  (78子コメント)

He didn't even take it apart to do anything with it. He just took a clock out of its case and went around showing it to everyone.

[–]Rainblast 363ポイント364ポイント  (61子コメント)

aside from the obvious red four-number seven-segment display:

Sounds like he replaced the display part?

That may sound trivial to all the geniuses here, but to a high schooler getting that minor tinkering to work is probably something he was proud of.

[–]Sgt_ROFLcopter 217ポイント218ポイント  (5子コメント)

Everyone starts somewhere.

[–]Fuzzy_Coconut 31ポイント32ポイント  (2子コメント)

150 project electrical kits from Radio Shack is where I got mine.

I have never been prouder of tinkering than when I built a working AM radio from kit parts.

[–]taterbizkit 22ポイント23ポイント  (0子コメント)

My brother already had the "99-in-1" kit when I got the "150-in-1" for my birthday.

Fucker stole all my long connectors.

[–]AFuzzyLion 23ポイント24ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'm pretty sure he's listing that as a similarity. As in, no need to point this one out, because it's so obvious it would be redundant. I think you're just reading it wrong, it doesn't seem like he replaced anything.

[–]Rainblast 13ポイント14ポイント  (1子コメント)

Upon rereading it, I think your interpretation is correct.

[–]pelvicmomentum 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, the display is the same.

[–]Jak2Rich 115ポイント116ポイント  (19子コメント)

yea, he was 14. have you meet most 14 year olds? I once took a battery and a speaker to school (at 13 so a little younger) and i kept touching the terminals back and forth to watch the diaphram move with the reveresed polarity. Everyone who sat near me thought i was a genuious and it was kinda sad. It is still september, so the kids in their freshman year are basiclly 8th graders.

[–]Simplefly 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

When I was 14 I took a disposable camera apart and thought it was so cool that I could make the flash go off by touching two pads with a wire and pushing the button. Then not knowing was a capacitor was, I shocked the shit out of myself when I accidentally touched it.

[–]GoTuckYourbelt 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Before you guys continue to get your reddit detective hats on, I'd like to point out the ludicrous amount of clock models out there, that many clocks can share the same internal circuitry whilst differing from outside appearance, and that the schematics for internally printed circuit cards can be shared across models and even manufacturers.

This seems to be the article that first brought the issue up, but just because he links it to that model doesn't mean it actually has to be it.

[–]EdwardFMA 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

thats the thing..there was no tinkering..like the guys video says, he just took the plastic case off. perhaps he had to use 2 screws to secure the display to his pencil case but that is the only effort put into the device's production. functionality wise, the clock works with or without its plastic cover

[–]John_Barlycorn 47ポイント48ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's how you get started in electronics. That's how I started, and a few years later I was building guitar amps for my friends.

The best analogy to this I can make, is... imaging a teenage boy shows up with a new guitar he just bought and strums a chord for you. Then some bitter 50yr old man in the room starts yelling "That's not a song! That's barely even a chord! You're a fraud! This is how you play a song!" and then yanks the new guitar out of the kids hands and starts playing a shitty rendition of Stairway to heaven. That's exactly what you people are doing to this kid.

[–]TrudeauReich 31ポイント32ポイント  (6子コメント)

Okay.

So... ?

You know the story here is that he was violently arrested, right? Not that he made a shitty clock, or took apart a clock?

I mean, who gives a shit whether or not he's the prodigy people seem to want him to be. That's just people being supportive. Why would you be against that?

[–]LiquidLogic 18ポイント19ポイント  (1子コメント)

The first thing you do when learning (electronics) is take things apart.

The very next thing is you put it back together, and hope to understand how it functions.

Sure the kid didn't 'INVENT' the clock. But to him, he probably learned a few things about the pieces of electronics that go into one by taking it apart and putting it back together in a new case.

[–]T_T_O_P 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I didn't find any articles using the word "invent" and definitely no direct quotes from Ahmen using the word "invent". The word he used was "made". He made his pencil case clock by pulling the innards of a clock and installing them in the pencil case.

This Thomas Talbot, whoever he is, has an agenda.

[–]TheWiseMountain 88ポイント89ポイント  (59子コメント)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mW4w0Y1OXE

"I made a clock"

"They took MY invention"

[–]Jamator01 144ポイント145ポイント  (52子コメント)

He's a kid. To him, this is an invention.

[–]Roller_ball 21ポイント22ポイント  (1子コメント)

I ran a Maker Camp this past summer. 14-year-olds constantly talked about their 'inventions' which were just them taking stuff apart. It is totally what a normal kid would do. People are way overreacting in every direction on this kid.

[–]TheWiseMountain 53ポイント54ポイント  (20子コメント)

As Chuzzy said, he's 14, not 10, he's not stupid.

[–]John_Barlycorn 42ポイント43ポイント  (11子コメント)

I did this exact thing at his age. I took a clock apart, figured out how the buttons worked, rewired the display. I sure as fuck thought I'd built something... and I certain think this kid did as well.

What have you built lately?

[–]Axist 82ポイント83ポイント  (7子コメント)

14 year olds misuse words.

EDIT: Often unintentionally.

[–]Squabbles123 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not just that clock either, all the stuff he's talking about "building" was also all purchased hardware, that USB hub to start with, holy shit can you be more obvious?

[–]sciamatic 1629ポイント1630ポイント  (501子コメント)

This is a weird video.

We don't think the kid invented the clock. He even said it was just messing around and made the thing in twenty minutes the night before.

So what if it's just a bedside clock with the housing removed? One of the first steps in learning how electronics work is just...taking off the housing and looking at how something is put together.

He's fourteen. He's not a trained electrician or even a devoted hobbyist. How "good" the clock is is deeply not the point.

[–]Baron-Harkonnen 694ポイント695ポイント  (137子コメント)

I think the guy in the video is implying he thinks the kid designed it to appear nefarious.

[–]ModernPoultry 401ポイント402ポイント  (71子コメント)

Ya, its certainly a possibility. I can picture a 14 year old with his buddies "Hey guys Im brown. Lets see if I can make a suspicious case and see if people will assume Im building a bomb. This will be funny".

[–]utnahpishtim 93ポイント94ポイント  (9子コメント)

When I was still a Muslim at 14, angry at the world and very misinformed, I would have thought this was funny. We did similar edgy pranks to scare White people, we thought it was hilarious.

[–]ModernPoultry 34ポイント35ポイント  (5子コメント)

I had black friends that did the same thing. They'd troll the shit out of general store managers by walking around all hood

[–]RG_Kid 75ポイント76ポイント  (14子コメント)

When the news first arose on reddit, I didn't see a picture of the said clock. I just assume it's a normal clock and everyone was overreacting. Then I saw on another news days later that the clock was a suitcase.

Edit : okay, so the clock only looks like a suitcase, but the size is small-ish?

Edit2: not a suitcase, but a clock in metal casing.

Really?

The whole school made a mockery of themselves for arresting the kid. But, this raises the question whether the kid intentionally doing this.

[–]beelzeflub 21ポイント22ポイント  (9子コメント)

As much as I'm pissed about institutionalized racism and everything other injustice you could manage to twist out of this... I've got to say this does make me raise my eyebrows a little bit.

[–]hymen_destroyer 57ポイント58ポイント  (5子コメント)

Ah, so the reddit contrarian pendulum begins to swing the other way....

Let's see how this plays out.

[–]redditaccountlogin 13ポイント14ポイント  (3子コメント)

I don't understand why this isn't everyone's assumption…. even without the being brown bit, 14 year old boys just live to do stupid things without thinking through consequences. I'm actually surprised that I'm alive after all the stupid crap we did growing up.

"this'll be awesome"

….

"oh, shit. Run!"

[–]Tylerjb4 80ポイント81ポイント  (5子コメント)

For real. I was exactly this way in middle school and so was everyone else. This kid just didn't realize he crossed a line

[–]jonnyclueless 27ポイント28ポイント  (0子コメント)

In my school we were not allowed to have portable music devices. So I just walked around with headphones not connected to anything. The school wasn't having any of it. Didn't matter that I technically didn't violate any rules. It was about trying to be a smart ass. We all did such things at that age. I suspect he's leaving little bits out that while still innocent might show he did a little provoking as is standard for most 14 year olds.

[–]Keoni9 98ポイント99ポイント  (14子コメント)

Because nothing says nefarious like a holographic tiger image.

[–]GoombaSmile 75ポイント76ポイント  (10子コメント)

I have seen this said many time before. But if I were making an IED, not a bomb, I would put that shit in a Hello Kitty lunch box because according to reddit if it looks cute then i cant be dangerous.

[–]MoarVespenegas 16ポイント17ポイント  (3子コメント)

Well if I was making an IED I know for damn sure one thing I wont put on it is a giant LED display as a timer.

[–]thebitter1 411ポイント412ポイント  (40子コメント)

Well, the media sure said he made the clock. The White House and that Canadian Astronaut used Ahmed's "ingenuity" to talk about how schools are trampling innovation. I was fooled, at least.

For reference (emphasis mine):

Muslim teen Ahmed Mohamed creates clock, shows teachers, gets arrested (CNN)

Handcuffed for Making Clock, Ahmed Mohamed, 14, Wins Time With Obama (New York Times)

This 14-year-old was arrested after bringing a homemade clock to school that 'looked like a bomb' (Business Insider)

14-year-old Ahmed Mohamed arrested for bringing homemade clock to school (The Verge)

Ahmed the Clockmaker Wants to Go to MIT (Time)

This Talented 14-Year-Old Made a Clock. So His School Got Him Arrested and Suspended. (Mother Jones)

‘They thought it was a bomb': 9th-grader arrested after bringing a home-built clock to school (The Washington Post)

Here's how a Texas school explained arresting a 14-year-old Muslim boy for making a clock (Vox)

Texas police have decided not to charge a 14-year-old Muslim boy arrested for bringing a homemade clock to school. (BBC)

No Charges For Ahmed Mohamed, Teen Arrested After Bringing Homemade Clock to School (NBC News)

"Ahmed Mohamed is an American teen who made headlines for his indefensible arrest at his public school in Irving, Texas, for the egregious crime of having brought a clock he made to school" (Forbes)

Texas schoolboy handcuffed for bringing homemade clock to school (The Guardian)

This Teenager Was Arrested for Making a Clock His Teachers Thought Was a Bomb (Gizmodo)

[–]fizikz3 114ポイント115ポイント  (0子コメント)

"never let the truth get in the way of the narrative" - nightcrawler

[–]Schmich 37ポイント38ポイント  (6子コメント)

The majority of the people think he created it. Don't you remember when he was showing all that hardware he was apparently playing with? Pretty sure he also said he invented that clock in an interview.

[–]brundlefly004 99ポイント100ポイント  (160子コメント)

Actually it was the kid who referred to it as his invention.

[–]Gragx 167ポイント168ポイント  (155子コメント)

Are we really going to judge a 14 year old based on his choice of words? He's messing around with electronics, which is cool. What's the problem

[–]snackies 27ポイント28ポイント  (1子コメント)

Honestly, a 14 year old kid wearing a nasa t-shirt that's a complete nerd and likely a social outcast? His one thing is that he might actually know electronics but doesn't have anything to show off. He's a middle school kid that might have been bullied or just ostricized socially it's the first week of high school, he wants to impress his engineering teacher. Fuck man then he gets arrested, now he has fuckwits on the internet pointing out that he may not actually know that much about electronics

Which let's all be honest we don't know if maybe he actually can do like some wiring for some hobby like building RC cars maybe, but maybe he was nervous about showing his hobby was building what some people would perceive to be 'toy cars' He's just trying to get noticed / impress a teacher.

Come on. Nobody deserves to be treated like that.

[–]darkh0ur 88ポイント89ポイント  (132子コメント)

He didn't mess around with the electronics at all, that is the point. The only thing he messed with is the shell of the alarm clock he took off of it before shoving the internals into a pencil box.

There are a lot of more impressive things done by kids half his age that doesn't get any recognition from fucking MIT, Zuckerberg, POTUS.

[–]dlh412pt 115ポイント116ポイント  (13子コメント)

I find MIT's response interesting considering MIT's treatment of a sophomore at their school who got arrested by a SWAT team at the airport and charged with disorderly conduct and possession of a hoax device for having a sweatshirt with LEDs on it. MIT released a statement calling her reckless among other things and basically let the media crucify her as weirdo nerd. You could argue that she should have known better going to an airport etc., but this kid was told by his teacher not to carry his clock around school and he did it anyways. So in a strikingly similar situation, this kid gets praised on national television and called an ideal student. Makes no sense.

[–]antihexe 43ポイント44ポイント  (4子コメント)

If you're familiar with MIT, at all, this shouldn't at all be surprising or interesting. Super hypocritical leadership at MIT.

[–]dlh412pt 24ポイント25ポイント  (2子コメント)

Well I am an alum. I still find it odd. And I realize that the "representative" was just a postdoc and it wasn't an official statement from the university, but it still immediately brought the Star situation to my mind.

[–]sciamatic 95ポイント96ポイント  (36子コメント)

There are a lot of more impressive things done by kids half his age that doesn't get any recognition from fucking MIT, Zuckerberg, POTUS.

And you're still missing the point.

He didn't get that attention because of his clock. He got that attention for being arrested, and a bunch of adults very kindly stepped in to give him positive reinforcement in hopes of counteracting what must have been a spectacularly shitty week for a fourteen year old. Regardless of what I think of any of those individuals or institutions, it was a nice gesture.

Jesus, Reddit. Do you really feel the need to be this obtuse and hipstery?

[–]mug3n 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

seriously. some of the comments feel like I'm reading /r/conspiracy. why does everything have to have an ulterior motive? the kid didn't ask for this attention.

it also sounds like there is a lot of saltiness over the fact that famous organizations and personalities were reaching out to him with offers and internships.

[–]thesilent30 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

Jesus, Reddit. Do you really feel the need to be this obtuse and hipstery?

The answer, by reading these threads, is for many people a resounding 'yes'.

"It just looks too weird for me not to think he and his father didnt plan this out."

That's an actual comment on this thread.

Which in my head is being read with the voice of the guy who asked Trump about getting rid of all the Muslims.

[–]snackies 3ポイント4ポイント  (28子コメント)

Right but even if you assume he was a nerd that didn't actually know very much if anything about electronics. He doesn't deserve to be arrested for ostensibly, being a fucking 14 year old nerd in no social circles trying to show off.

[–]riightsure 37ポイント38ポイント  (33子コメント)

When I was a kid Ahmed's age I actually built clocks out of kits (no big deal but actually something -- it took me hours to accomplish). I honestly thought he did something like this and took it to school. Opening a plastic case and taking the electronics out and putting it in another box is not novel enough to take to school and show it to your teacher if you ask me.

[–]PeterMus 357ポイント358ポイント  (26子コメント)

So, they suggest a possible motive for this reassembly of the clock was to manufacture a suspicious looking device. The device would set off alarm bells at the school. The stunt would give the child's father a platform to speak to muslims and aid his political ambitions.

I think this is entirely plausible.

But... intentions don't matter when the reason people are upset is still entirely valid. The police and administration still made a lot of mistakes and outright ignored Ahmed's rights.

[–]Patastrophe 74ポイント75ポイント  (3子コメント)

This has been my exact feeling since this story broke. I'm not going to pretend like I know Ahmed's motives (though political stunt seems far fetched), but ever since I saw the clock and recognized that he didn't invent or even tinker with anything, I was immediately reminded of my own pre-teen angst and desire to antagonize authority figures/see what I could get away with. I was interrogated by a police officer and principal in the 8th grade for vandalism I ACTUALLY did, fervently denying the accusations until the bitter end. This is all just to say 14 y/os are perfectly capable of malicious intent. The way this was handled was ridiculous, and I do believe it was racially motivated, and that's where the conversation should begin and end. Zuckerberg and MIT know perfectly well he didn't make shit, they are hitching a ride on the bandwagon, Ahmed knows he didn't make shit, he's no STEM martyr.

This rant brought to you by an extremely jealous EE grad student.

[–]IAM_Deafharp_AMA 23ポイント24ポイント  (4子コメント)

I think we should throw out the "plausible" scenario where this was all set up for political gain. The presidential elections in Sudan isn't until years from now. I really doubt this was at all politically motivated IMO.

[–]fanthor 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

If the stunt itself is an act to be a Muslim victim, doesn't it actually prove what they're trying to say anyway?

[–]ZenRain 179ポイント180ポイント  (34子コメント)

Let's assume that this was all manufactured.

It still doesn't change the fact the police handcuffed a fourteen-year-old boy and refused to allow him to contact his parents, the fact his school administration didn't evacuate the building, and the principal and mayor of the city were revealed to be the racist cockbags they are.

Even if the act was manufactured and Ahmed Mohammed deliberately baited a "Islamphobia trap", the end result is that they treated a fourteen-year-old boy with a clock he soldered to a pencil case as a fucking criminal and patted themselves on the back for doing so.

Even in the worst case scenario of Ahmed Mohammed deliberately engineering this situation to be as bait as possible for the administration, the fact of the matter is they grabbed that bait like it was fucking gold: They handcuffed a fourteen-year-old, refused to let him talk to his parents, and outright bullied him into signing a statement with threats no fourteen-year-old would reasonably be equipped to deal with.

At worst, he exposed what racist dickbags everyone in a position of authority in his hometown happens to be. Even if he set everything up in advance, I'd still shake the kid's hand and praise him.

There is nothing praiseworthy about how anyone in a position of responsibility handled the situation whatsoever. It was a textbook example of how to treat a minority in the worst, most lawsuit-inducing manner possible. I'd be giving shit to the people involved even if i was a KKK Grand Dragon because holy shit, you handed this fucking kid a softball lawsuit that iron-tight?

Even if this was all manufactured on Ahmed's part (which I don't believe, for the record), everyone involved with Amhed's illegal detention and every other civil rights violation deserves every lawsuit coming to them, because holy shit they violated ALL the rights with this one.

[–]3RGT 405ポイント406ポイント  (162子コメント)

Maybe he intentionally made it look malicious?

[–]NorthBlizzard 609ポイント610ポイント  (36子コメント)

WOOWOO CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE BRO!

[–]ATX4DayzBrah 181ポイント182ポイント  (30子コメント)

Whoa you're PC bro? I'm PC Univ of Texas, bro.

[–]russell_m 114ポイント115ポイント  (17子コメント)

FUCK YEAH BRO I'M PC CAL STATE BRO.

[–]BlackCandlesBurn 125ポイント126ポイント  (3子コメント)

DID I HEAR SOMEONE SAY AHMED MUHAMMAD ISN'T A SHINING EXAMPLE OF AMERICA'S FUTURE? BECAUSE IF I HEARD AHMED MUHAMMAD ISN'T A SHINING EXAMPLE OF AMERICA'S FUTURE I'M READY TO THROW DOWN BRO.

[–]tomdanksthethird 53ポイント54ポイント  (10子コメント)

HEY UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX HERE

[–]rojoeso 46ポイント47ポイント  (8子コメント)

WOOWOO WAIT - YOU GUYS PC TOO?!

[–]TheSandyRavage 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

YEAH BRO! WE SHOULD ALL HANG OUT TOGETHER BRO!

WOO WOO!

[–]Masenkoe 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

WE SHOULD ALL GET A HOUSE TOGETHER AND UNITE OUR TOLERANT VIEWS

[–]Corwinator 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

PC at OU checking in, bro.

[–]WigginIII 53ポイント54ポイント  (10子コメント)

Maybe he intentionally made it look cool to 14 year olds?

"Hey man, nice watch...too bad I carry around my clock, in this cool little briefcase."

[–]wenzela 24ポイント25ポイント  (6子コメント)

Yup, this is exactly what I dislike about all these comments that start with "maybe". You can always say the exact opposite with a "maybe" as well.

[–]primo_mellon 20ポイント21ポイント  (31子コメント)

What's what they arrested him for, somehow this got lost in the noise: "They arrested me and they told me that I committed the crime of a hoax bomb, a fake bomb,"

Which it does resemble pretty much every suit case bomb ever seen in a movie: http://i.ytimg.com/vi/6CCLM94pJSg/hqdefault.jpg

[–]RenobMan 337ポイント338ポイント  (131子コメント)

Interview "My hobby is to invent stuff and I do a lot of stuff for example inventing this type of stuff, right here transformers, you get what im saying, but I made a clock.."

He doesnt want to show or talk about his other inventions which is strange, you think he would want to show off actual inventions he made but he always goes back to his clock bomb. I think he knew it looked like a movie bomb and thats what he wanted. Not because he wanted to do a bomb threat but just because it was cool looking. When I was young I wouldve thought it would be cool to make a bomb looking clock and play at home with it with my friends pretending it was a bomb. I wouldnt be an idiot and bring it to school and show it off. You can get in trouble for bringing a butter knife or a water gun, did he not think that was a stupid idea ?

Good Morning America Interview At 1:08 he just has a mess of random computer parts and wires, he never shows any of his inventions. The random motherboard of a "media player" probably a DVD player he brings is strange. Why was the clock apart of his future plan? Was he planning on trying to sell the clock on shark tank? What does he want to pitch on shark tank? I bet they asked him to bring a invention and he didnt really have any real inventions so he just brought a motherboard so it appears "smart" and "techy" to people who dont know anything about tech.

The screen is also on the inside, my guess is he was inspired by COD bombs because it would look all "bomby" with the wires and everything looking exposed. If he was just trying to make a clock, thats one ugly, messy clock

Edit: His engineering teacher warned him about it prior to it beeping in his English class. I find it interesting his clock beeped randomly in English class, like what are the odds of it a alarm randomly getting set in his backpack and then getting turned on and then being set for the same time he is in class. Why would he just disconnect power after his teacher warned him. Not a smart kid.

[–]SharpTenor 252ポイント253ポイント  (15子コメント)

Ahmed is going to be spending a lot of late nights learning electronics to catch up to his reputation! Fake it 'til you make it.

[–]Trynottobeacunt 48ポイント49ポイント  (3子コメント)

Dont worry. The media and all those companies who sent him tweets will make good on that for him. Then he'll be painted as an entrepeneur and us peasants will be told what it's possible to do with just a 'little hard work and determination'...

I fucking hate this planet.

[–]Sugreev2001 48ポイント49ポイント  (10子コメント)

If that "clock" is anything to go by, it's gonna be extremely hard for him to make even beginner's stuff.

[–]dadoodadoo 215ポイント216ポイント  (54子コメント)

I think in the rush to defend the kid, people were painting him as some kind of "genius" and symbol of all "makers" and so on. From all I've seen he's just a kid without much knowledge who likes to take things apart and play with wires.

Who cares! That's a good enough place to start!

His skill with electronics is irrelevant to the question of whether he intended it to look like a bomb, whether he threatened anyone with it, whether the police were right to interrogate him without his parents present and take him out of school in handcuffs.

[–]cathartic_caper 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Who cares! That's a good enough place to start!

Absolutely. He doesn't have to be a genius. Most of the most productive engineers we have aren't geniuses, they're just hard workers with an interest.

[–]sumguy720 6ポイント7ポイント  (12子コメント)

he could have been using the 9 volt battery backup.

[–]h4boxer 6ポイント7ポイント  (6子コメント)

The battery most likely didn't turn the clock on, instead it probably just keep the time function working so when the clock lost power and was plugged back in it would have the right time. So if the power went out at night the clock would have the same time and alarm setting so it will wake the person up at the right time.

[–]EquiFritz 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Wait...so...if there's not a battery and it's not plugged in...how is it beeping? It sorta seems like he would have to go out of his way to make it beep in that English class.

This story and the reaction are completely incredible. It's like a nation of zombie people just repeating whatever the media tells them to be upset about.

[–]h4boxer 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think it means it was plugged in like another comment said, and the kid might have gone out of his way to make it beep.

It really is amazing how fast people will pick up pitchfork and react, don't really know why but it seems to be a common thing that humans have always done in some form or another.

[–]BevoGenocide 57ポイント58ポイント  (49子コメント)

Yeah, what good is that clock if the screen is inside the case?

[–]iamacannibal 44ポイント45ポイント  (22子コメント)

This is my guess. This kid likes to tinker with stuff. He maybe had an old alarm clock and took it apart and thought it looked cool inside...electronics look cool to some people...so he wanted to put it into a new housing. He says in the interview he likes to invent things and he invented a clock but I think he was just using the wrong word.

When I was his age I would do similar things...I would take stuff apart and put it in different things or cut a hole in the housing and put plexiglass there so I can see the insides...

I don't think it was malicious like the guy in this video thinks...I think it's just a kid trying to learn how stuff works.

I could be wrong but I don't think I am.

[–]FunkyPanda 92ポイント93ポイント  (6子コメント)

I don't think he has any idea what he is doing. If you look at some other pictures of his, he's holding random circuits with a soldering iron, that are way too complicated for him to solder himself and are clearly industrially made, with Google Images search results for "motherboard" in the background.

He's just trying to look like a young 'inventor' now, but he isn't, in my opinion.

[–]arclathe 14ポイント15ポイント  (3子コメント)

But all of reddit decided he is a genius because he made a clock. Please ignore all the videos of people of all ages making simple clocks, on youtube.

[–]PoutchMan 568ポイント569ポイント  (86子コメント)

His father has has twice declared himself a presidential candidate in Sudan. When Florida pastor Terry Jones put the Quran on trial and later burned it in 2012, Mohamed was the Muslim holy book's defense attorney.

So the father has intentionally put himself in the media spotlight before, as a defender of Islam.

The clock was not an invention, the clock (which looks like a movie trope bomb) was shown to a teacher for no reason (was not a homework assignment or class project), and in another video Ahmed shows off his other works (a motherboard with random wires), so he is clearly not a wunderkind.

So this is probably another publicity stunt like balloon boy from a few years back, created by his father.

[–]TTT_33333 16ポイント17ポイント  (1子コメント)

balloon boy

Holy... shit. I had completely forgot about that! lol

[–]fvtown714x 47ポイント48ポイント  (14子コメント)

[–]nicolauz 37ポイント38ポイント  (1子コメント)

What the fuck did I just watch.

Edit: Wow read that story. Really tragic for those kids that dad sounds like someone who would end up killing someone.

[–]ItsNeverSunnyInCleve 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

SOME TWELVE YEAR OLDS SHREDDING IS WHAT YOU JUST WATCHED.

edit.. I didn't know either and I was just goofing.. but the balloon boy was the singer. huh

[–]Justmetalking 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Kids not bad actually.

[–]WaitForItTheMongols 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

was shown to a teacher for no reason (was not a homework assignment or class project)

I mean, hold off there because this isn't a valid criticism. At one point when I was 14 (coincidentally the same as this kid) I converted a wireless mouse to wired because I didn't want to deal with batteries. When it was done I thought it was super cool so I took it to my comp sci teacher to show him. As you said, it "was not a homework assignment or class project",but it was something I made that I was proud of, and I wanted someone with relevant understanding of it to be able to see it. I know this sounds fake but I'm going to finish the story: That teacher that I showed my creation to? I had him write me a letter of recommendation. It is directly a result of that letter that I am now typing this comment from my dorm at MIT. School isn't all about doing things because of an assignment. It's also a melting pot for people's interests. Don't be so quick to accuse everyone of everything.

That's all, hope I didn't come off too strong. Didn't mean to attack you or anything.

[–]chewee123 27ポイント28ポイント  (3子コメント)

So basically this is a "Oh look at us, we're Muslim and we're being persecuted!" sort of thing?

[–]ToeTacTic 65ポイント66ポイント  (2子コメント)

It was a bit perfect when he had the NASA shirt on

[–]sensitiveinfomax 28ポイント29ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, especially since it was his sister who leaked that image to the media.

[–]newtry 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

This guy offers proper evidence that Ahmed made a kinda shitty clock, and then makes wild assertions that he was conspiring to cause problems. Kid's 14, dude.

[–]Ubernam 100ポイント101ポイント  (55子コメント)

Regardless of everything, I believe the box he put this in looks like a cliche bomb box you'd see on a movie. Nowadays with schools being strict on guns to where you cannot even bring in a fake gun, and sometimes even make a gun sign with your HANDS, I'm pretty sure bomb replicas go for the same kind of punishment. No need to be arrested, but punished for sure if his intentions were indeed to provoke something.

[–]evadcobra1 57ポイント58ポイント  (24子コメント)

That box is a pencil box sold at staples for $10. Vaultz pencil box

[–]sunshineinboxerino 21ポイント22ポイント  (15子コメント)

Yes it looks like a bomb that a person sees on TV. He might have been trying to make a joke or who knows maybe he was passing it off as his own.

[–]jamaicanmefap 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

Social engineering at its finest.

[–]Happyneb 53ポイント54ポイント  (15子コメント)

He even admitted that he knew it looked like a bomb before he went into school. He said "That's why I put it in a Nintendo briefcase". Also he didn't make the clock or reprogram it or anything, just took it out of the housing. Why would you bring something to school you know looks potentially like a bomb. His father obviously knew he made the clock. I think they intended on something like this happening to gain sympathy and show how persecuted the Muslim community is given the fathers status. I don't think it is just a coincidence that someone who works for the civil rights of Muslims at a high level had their son falsely arrested for bringing in something that looks like a bomb to the majority of people.

[–]Planetariophage 78ポイント79ポイント  (14子コメント)

I think anyone who's done anything with a microcontroller smelt that something was fishy. The first thing I saw in the picture was a circuit board that he didn't make himself, and probably didn't even solder himself. And then a transformer connected directly to mains?

Seriously, a clock a 14 year old would make would involve a breadboard, a microcontroller (most likely an Arduino), and batteries. Something like this: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/LT1BVhRJPio/hqdefault.jpg (he did say he invented it, and made the clock. Not take apart a clock and put it in a different "bomb-like" box)

I'm sure other people who dabble around in these things would be downright embarrassed to show of something they didn't understand/make as something they made themselves.

Edit: for the record, I don't blame the kid. I blame the media for making this a whole racism thing and making it a huge deal. But I can see why the EE teacher didn't give the "response he was hoping for" (“He was like, ‘That’s really nice,’” Ahmed said, as quoted by the Dallas Morning News. “‘I would advise you not to show any other teachers.’”), because he probably saw immediately that the kid made 0% of this.

[–]xXNuclearTacoXx 124ポイント125ポイント  (12子コメント)

I wish I was discriminated against so I could meet the president and join NASA.

[–]Fakeaccount234 92ポイント93ポイント  (2子コメント)

reddit in a fucking comment

[–]teapot112 23ポイント24ポイント  (0子コメント)

Its literally discrimination against me because I didn't get all the goodwill out of the discrimination I didn't get in the first place!

[–]LifeIsBullshitMiroki 30ポイント31ポイント  (2子コメント)

dem MIT connections and invitations probably won't hurt either. I can take clocks apart... thinking about re-applying

[–]Trynottobeacunt 136ポイント137ポイント  (42子コメント)

as you can see from this thread- people are too heavily emotionally invested in this story to not shit all over whoever points this out...

I mean the kid was being offered jobs at nasa, facebook etc and having shitloads in donations/ electronics equipment sent to him for apparently being some aspiring creator. Now that it's revealed that he simply unscrewed an alarm clock from the casing and glued it to a box that he bought the public cannot take it and are reacting really pretty violently to what amounts to just the 'reality' of the situation...

Also note that there's a very heavy sort of 'troll racism' going on in this comment thread and that is then being used by people to tarnish anyone who can see the fraud as some sort of racist/ islamaphobic themselves (when really they're just pointing out the insane public and media reaction).

I'll probably be ruined for this comment, but fuck it. I should be able to exist in reality even if it does harm the bubbles of a bunch of easily lead, emotionally fueled knobends.

EDIT: In reply to all the prematurely emotionally invested people who deny evidence in search of something more 'religious'... Kinda extreme really, it makes me feel like an evolutionary biologist attempting to talk to a creationist about fossils! ...In reply to all of you and for all future replies: 'Yes, you are correct. None of this was planned in order to create a media shitstorm. There's absolutely no way at all that has ever/ or could ever happen. ESPECIALLY SINCE HE WAS ARRESTED BY THE REAL LIFE ACTUAL POLICE (added layer of legitimacy to the story that's so powerful that it is beyond question, right guys?)... Everyone who doesn't believe the story or questions it is a racist, Islamophobe, or HATES CHILDREN and just wants to no longer allow them to be creative. 'Nobody called him a genius' ever. Nobody gave him loads of items or offered him jobs/ internships/ places at major companies (I just imagined that). Aaaaand have a really great day.'

[–]fabulousprizes 141ポイント142ポイント  (22子コメント)

no one offered him a job at NASA or Facebook. He was invited to stop by for a visit if he could.

[–]stackinpointers 65ポイント66ポイント  (7子コメント)

I mean the kid was being offered jobs at nasa, facebook etc and having shitloads in donations/ electronics equipment sent to him for apparently being some aspiring creator

That's completely wrong. You're confusing PR with charity. Facebook didn't actually offer him a job. They just made a point of saying "we support you."

Now that it's revealed that he simply unscrewed an alarm clock from the casing and glued it to a box that he bought the public cannot take it and are reacting really pretty violently to what amounts to just the 'reality' of the situation...

Where is the public violently reacting to this shocking revelation?

All I see is a special breed of neckbeard that's offended by a miscategorization (read: hyperbole) by the media, and feel compelled to make youtube videos "debunking" the feel-good story of the year.

But they're missing the point.

The point is that Ahmed exhibits some of the most important traits that are missing in American youth; technical curiosity and an aptitude for engineering. It's just not common to find school children who are genuinely fascinated by math / science / engineering.

Let me know when Facebook revokes their invitation because he maybe wasn't as impressive as some media outlets originally portrayed him.

[–]Murgie 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean the kid was being offered jobs at nasa

it makes me feel like an evolutionary biologist attempting to talk to a creationist about fossils!

http://i.imgur.com/T66CfLK.gif

[–]hotprof 26ポイント27ポイント  (2子コメント)

This kid is trolling America so fucking hard right now.

[–]bobartig 28ポイント29ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'd assumed that he'd taken apart a clock in order to build a different kind of clock, i.e. a stopwatch, or maybe counting in some alternate fashion. It hadn't dawned on me that he just wired a clock into a briefcase like a bomb, and nothing more. I mean, you can clearly see the printed circuit board and cabling that was part of some other commercially manufactured product, but I hadn't otherwise given the project much thought.

What it really reminded me of was the stupid props we used to build for our video projects in middle school. Our school projects always involved spys and secrets, dastardly inventions that were just a few household items strung together, people getting murdered, and blowing stuff up (i.e splicing in scenes from Star Trek). And, it all looked like garbage poop because it was cut together on two VCRs and no mixers or anything. We would have built a "bomb" like this, but with more wires, and a duct-taped mass to represent some sort of charge.

[–]spergery1 36ポイント37ポイント  (17子コメント)

You know what? The kid was curious. He took something apart, got it down to its working components, and put it in a case.

Is he a genius? Is he an inventor? No. He's just a curious kid. He's neither a hero nor a villain.

So what if it's just taking apart an existing product and rearranging it? My first experience with programming was making a boot disk for Ultima VI by copying autoexec.bat and config.sys line for line from the manual. I wrote a "virus" when I was 8 that simply consisted of modifying autoexec.bat to delete all word perfect files on startup because I thought my mom was spending too much time on school and not enough on me. Now I'm a programmer.

My point is, everyone starts somewhere. This kid doesn't have to be a genius for his treatment to be unfair. His clock doesn't have to be anything more than a disassembled alarm clock for it to be a worthy first step. What matters is the mindset, not the output. It matters that he's curious and likes to make things.

For someone who makes things for a living this looks childish, and it is--but that's the whole point. This is building a model rocket from a kit or putting a cold air intake on your first car. It's the ember that sparks the flame of lifelong curiosity.

So kudos, Ahmed. You took apart a clock and caused a commotion. Never let that spirit die.

[–]robofunk_ 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm think the reason he put it in the case was because he couldn't put the original clock it back together after taking it apart. I can't count how many times I ruined some electronic plastic housings as a kid taking it apart and couldn't reassemble. At least he saved it and it is somewhat functional. The alarm probably also reset to a 12:00AM, making it unpredictable, as anyone after a blackout can attest to.

[–]Flemtality 16ポイント17ポイント  (5子コメント)

He's absolutely right about one thing, it's a manufactured clock with the plastic housing removed. However, I don't think there was any malicious intent by the kid or his family here. That's conspiracy theory level shit.

At the same time, all of the people calling this kid some kind of genius child like something out of a movie need to shut the fuck up. He took a clock apart. Nothing more. The arrest obviously never should have happened and the media blitz should have been more truthful.

[–]Gizmeow 14ポイント15ポイント  (3子コメント)

Sounds to me like he knew he shouldn't have brought it to school. He said he added a cable so it wouldn't look "that much suspicious".

[–]digitaljohn 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

Seriously... If I were tasked to create a movie prop that looked like a plausible, hidden bomb, it would probably look exactly like that.

Get a clock, take it apart and hide it in a case of some sort.

Its ridiculous that some people cannot see this.

Maybe, just maybe if he did actually engineer the clock itself, then it could be an innocent story. But he got an off the shelf clock, put it inside a case and it looks like a cliché bomb.

[–]Crulo 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Except there is no big block of PlayDo to look like C4... there is no container of "suspicious liquid"... nothing about that jumble of electronic components looks like a bomb. It could be a timer for a bomb... but bombs aren't just circuit boards and wires. You need something to go "boom!", and this was missing anything that resembled that even remotely.

If you people think that looks like a bomb, then please NEVER OPEN YOUR COMPUTER because you will immediately think "OMG BOMB!!"

[–]IRageAlot 21ポイント22ポイント  (5子コメント)

My kids "make" shit all the time too; most of it is garbage. It's important garbage, but still garbage. I "made" things as a kid too. I made "robots" which were PVC pipes, cut with mitered ends and taped together in a hand shape; pulling the yarn that ran down the inside of the pipes would make the hand close. I "made" a head for it that could "speak" which was taking a styrofoam head and putting a phone receiver in it and speaking into the mic. It was a bunch of taped together garbage. I'm giving it way too much credit with my description too. I also made "pocket warmers" which was nothing but a 9V battery with wire wrapped around the terminals to short it out and make it get hot--I carried that shit in my pocket next to my nuts like a moron... Because I was a moron, I was 9.

But, now I'm a software developer with my own team converting large scale applications; that is related in a myriad of ways to the junk I made as a kid. An interested child doesn't make breathtaking And useful projects, they make junk, but in that junk you find a sense of curiosity. If a kid is making a mind blowing project that 99% of adults can't do then you don't have a curious child you have a fuckin prodigy.

Makers don't just make, they also take things apart and tinker with it, and sometimes put it back together. Like people who "make" wireless charging desks by hot-gluing the guts of a wireless charger to a poorly chiseled out gap in the bottom of their desk. And, when a kid does that kind of thing, it's barely able to be distinguished from a pile of taped together garbage.

This isn't indicative of him not being interested in science, electronics and engineering. This is just indicative of him not being a prodigy; that's a fairly unremarkable fact.

Edit: I want to be clear, I'm not on the kids side. I'm on the fence in regard to this issue. I think a little understanding on both sides is probably the right course of action, but this video is a complete tangent.

[–]gandalfblue 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

I also made "pocket warmers" which was nothing but a 9V battery with wire wrapped around the terminals to short it out and make it get hot--I carried that shit in my pocket next to my nuts like a moron... Because I was a moron, I was 9.

Shit man you just made an inductor you were doing better than most 9 year olds, and I doubt it was all that hot(would be dangerous though), you have basically 0 or minimal resistance(R). The formula for heat given off would be IR2 or basically nothing.

The real danger is the chemical battery exploding or you getting a surge of current through your balls.

[–]robofunk_ 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

One of my most notable inventions at 11 or 12 was a "speaker phone". I attached an old 80's boombox with a bunch of exposed wires to the internals of an old phone through trial and error (looking back I could have really used a soldering iron and shouldn't have played with live phone jacks that are 48V). This kid while maybe not as inventive (though to be honest it just connecting wires) is doing similar things, it's really sad this is now a conspiracy. I hope he finds someone to nurture his curiosity if not a school (lol) somewhere extracurricular. I'm now an electrical engineer.

[–]most_low 40ポイント41ポイント  (25子コメント)

The kid said himself that he put the thing together in like 20 minutes. If anyone thought he invented anything in that amount of time they are delusional. It seems like quite a stretch to claim that he was being intentionally provocative. It seems more likely that he wanted to take a clock apart and put it back together in a way where you can see all the insides while it's working. Or that he wanted to just fuck around with some cool looking electronic stuff and show off a circuit board to his teacher.

Sure, the kid calls all his things "inventions" but that's obviously just because he doesn't know exactly what an invention is. I tell my little brother that we are doing a "science experiment" when we build a baking soda and vinegar volcano but I guess I'm a big FRAUD because it's really a "demonstration" and not an "experiment" at all.

People use words wrong with kids sometimes to get them excited about science. I don't blame anybody for not saying "quit calling them inventions; all you're doing is taking a perfectly good clock and putting it in a less functional form".

[–]jhangel77 37ポイント38ポイント  (23子コメント)

Did I accidentally walk into /r/conspiracy?

[–]mugicha 10ポイント11ポイント  (6子コメント)

No. I think what's interesting for me about this is that in all this media shitstorm the obvious point the guy in this video is making was lost. Forget your agenda or politics for a moment and just reflect on the fact that even though we keep hearing about this kid as an inventor and that he is now a cause celeb in the maker community, he didn't actually make or invent anything. I have a degree in Electrical Engineering, trust me everything thing the guy in this video is saying is true. There is nothing about this "clock" that is similar to what a hobbyist or tinkerer would create. That whole narrative is bullshit. Come to your own conclusions about what that all means, but the narrative that we're being fed about this in the media is total bullshit.

[–]JacoMescudi 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

Seriously!! Has everybody lost their fucking minds in this thread??

[–]shaqalicious 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

hey man did you see that epic south park episode this week

[–]ikescurvy 19ポイント20ポイント  (13子コメント)

Yes, let's debate about whether or not the kid invented a clock instead of focusing on the overreaction of the school or the racist cop.

I mean, totally asking the right questions here.

[–]GDMDG 56ポイント57ポイント  (76子コメント)

I posted a philosophical(-esque) critique of the whole situation in /r/philosophy. It was removed, but I want to repost it here for anyone interested.


I aim to show here that the universal response to the treatment of Ahmed Mohamed (and its implications) is misguided. For one, it presupposes ethnic or religious discrimination where there is none. It also presupposes an idealistic level of knowledge that his teachers should not be presumed to possess, which brings an element of prejudice to the story that does not exist in reality.

The thought experiments:

(1) An elementary teacher is at his desk while class is recessed. A student comes up and presents to him a gadget. This is the gadget. It is a gun-shaped object: that is, it's physical characteristics are remarkably similar to those of a gun. When you ask the student if it is a gun, he claims that it is a camera. You know nothing about cameras, and little more about guns, but you do know that this has the properties of what you consider to be a gun. Knowing that you nor any school authority can make a proper judgment as to the nature of this object, you phone the police, who then question the student in a room for an hour or two.

(2) You're a teacher, eating at a McDonald's on a Saturday evening. A man comes up to you and asks you why you're eating alone at McDonald's on a Saturday evening. Before you begin to answer him, he interrupts you: "no matter, no matter. Tell me, sir: which of these devices is a suitcase bomb? And which is a clock? Would you risk your life on the inference that one is a clock and the other a bomb?" You answer yourself.

These two thought experiments suffice to show that the school administrators are not at fault in their caution regarding Mohamed's device. It is important here to remember the charge levied against them: racial and religious discrimination. This is reasoned that, because Mohamed is of Muslim descent (from an area largely Muslim), that the authorities presumed it was a bomb because of his descent. Of course, that Mohamed is from an area that does have a lot of bomb-related violence does not mean that he made a bomb (or brought one to school); but more importantly neither does it mean he did not. The list of students who have been searched, detained, and even apprehended because of a threat or perceived threat of an explosion device in a school is not limited to Middle Eastern students. I would even say that the majority of students who have been victim to such things have not been Middle Eastern.

This thought experiment has been narrow thus far. I don't want to conclude anything about the other factors surrounding the situation, such as whether Mohamed was granted parental supervision during interrogation, or whether the principal acted rationally in all aspects of judging Mohamed's case. What I wanted to show is that we can conclude beyond reasonable doubt that the actions of the authorities were not due to color or creed.

One last point: if it is so bad to inference, based on a person's color or creed, that they commited the worst of those who are also thatcolor or creed, why then is it not just as bad to inference based on a person's color or creed (not Muslim) that they committed such a discrimination? Because discriminating against someone for his lack of properties is just as bad as discriminating against someone for his definite properties. If it is bad to assume a Muslim committed a terrorist act because he is a Muslim, then it is just as bad to assume a non-Muslim committed an act of discrimination because he is non-Muslim. Both are cases of discriminating (with no evidence), the difference being (a) is labeled violent and (b) is labeled racist, neither of which being significantly worse than the other.

[–]ThePARZ 88ポイント89ポイント  (33子コメント)

Except they didn't ever act as though they thought it was a bomb. They didn't evacuate the school, they didn't call in a bomb squad or explosive experts. They asked him what it was and he said a clock, and they treated it as such, even keeping it with them on the way to the police station where it remains. They never acted like it was a bomb.

[–]brundlefly004 24ポイント25ポイント  (3子コメント)

They never did think it was a bomb. They called the cops because they thought it could used in a bomb hoax.

[–]GDMDG 40ポイント41ポイント  (24子コメント)

Actually, the police have said so far that he was uncooperative and wouldn't explain what the gadget was. It seems their fear was not that it was a bomb, but that it was a bomb hoax: an apt example would be a student bringing a fake gun to school to scare people.

This seems likely, given the fact that in the interview he claimed he brought it to school to show his engineering teacher. And he did show his engineering teacher, who said "don't show anyone else as this looks just like a suitcase bomb".

What did he do? He took his beeping, locked, metal suitcase bomb look-a-like to his English course.

So you tell me...

[–]Machismo01 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

My first "robot" was a damned RC car that I tore apart. I changed nothing about it, but it was a start for my junior high mind. By my senior year, I was with a group of students that built a 150 lb robot for a national competition. 14 years later I've built half a dozen electromechanical system that can be called "robots" in some way or another (the term is too broad for the industry in my opinion) and those are the less interesting bits of my engineering career. This guy is an internet troll. The kid is a budding engineer or scientist and should be encouraged and challenged (TECHNICALLY, not with this BS) every step of the way.

[–]Iamadinocopter 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even the engineering teacher dismissed it. He knew it was a clock but also told him not to show anyone else because 1) he didn't invent shit and 2) it actually does look suspicious as fuck.