上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 418

[–]ne99ne 183ポイント184ポイント  (149子コメント)

robots would reduce demand for real women and children

Something about that sounds... interesting.

[–]TheMancersDilema 69ポイント70ポイント  (3子コメント)

[–]suugakusha 49ポイント50ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh, I should have showed him "Electro-gonorrhea: the noisy killer"

[–]raiderrash 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

First thing I thought of when I read the title haha

[–]NineFourEleven 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Came to make sure this was said. Was not disappointed.

[–]smthsmth 76ポイント77ポイント  (1子コメント)

women fear monopoly on straight male sex slipping

[–]dangrullon87 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

Boom someone said it.

[–]zstandig 30ポイント31ポイント  (3子コメント)

Good for the environment, anyway I can say the same thing about dildos.

[–]Anonymoustard 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

They are becoming a niche market.

[–]rhott 11ポイント12ポイント  (3子コメント)

But think of all those poor lucy liu bots!

[–]frewfrew 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

i foresee a lot of 15+ year old, crappy beat up cars parked in front of little tiny studio apartments with blacked out windows in our future. . . .

[–]wnose 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Happiness lies in experiences, not material objects. Well, except for a very special blonde-haired object.

[–]Not_Pictured 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I can't experience my penis in a Lucy Liu Bot without a material Lucy Liu Bot.

[–]bsutansalt 26ポイント27ポイント  (7子コメント)

Look up MGTOW and the Japanese herbivore movement. Right there are millions upon millions of men who would jump at the opportunity of having their sexual needs met without the entanglements of dealing with the opposite sex.

And then you've got the myriad of people who would use sexbots for a connection many seek. See also: people who go to prostitutes who don't have sex and just want to have close intimate talks with someone else once in a while.

[–]frewfrew 16ポイント17ポイント  (4子コメント)

"I'm not paying for the sex. I'm paying for her to go home after"

[–]RemusShepherd 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

"I'm not paying for the sex. I'm paying for her to go into sleep mode after."

[–]Sexpistolz 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Im not paying for sex. No really im not. Hence the shovel and duct tape.

[–]networklackey 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

It might finally create some demand for me however.

--future robosexual.

[–]adgflt 25ポイント26ポイント  (12子コメント)

Ladies would become nicer overnight.

[–]squirrelmonkie 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dude just imagine going out to bars, women would buy us drinks!!

[–]SeekerFaolan 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The idea that women would actually have to have an attractive personality to get a man fucking terrifies these people.

[–]KicksButtson 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

Many places across the earth are dealing with a population crisis. Maybe robot sex dolls is exactly what we need.

[–]keepitwithmine 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

Not first world countries who would actually have access to the robots.

[–]lmfaocopter 10ポイント11ポイント  (3子コメント)

but women are strong and independant! they don't need no man

[–]Paid_Internet_Troll 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

they don't need no man

Pfft. There are plenty of places with no women. Oil rigs, fishing boats, ranger units, most space flights, coal mines, arctic expeditions, etc.

I've never heard of a place that was all women, with no men, except for maybe a convent.

[–]frewfrew 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

until there aren't any. . . either way, I suspect we'll see.

[–]Khethma -1ポイント0ポイント  (55子コメント)

I think the idea they're getting at is that rapists and pedophiles would be able to abuse the robots and fewer women and children would become victims. But the suggestion in the article is that the opposite is true. The sex robots would encourage rapists and pedophiles to develop their deviant behavior further, and inevitably, many will move on from robots to live victims when, had they not indulged themselves with the robots, some of them might not have ever acted on their impulse to rape or abuse anyone.

Edit: I'm not suggesting that everyone who uses sex toys or dolls or robots is a deviant or potential rapist or pedophile, and I don't think the article is suggesting that either. I just wanted to express what I think the point of the objection to sexbots was in the article.

[–]Nebulose11 89ポイント90ポイント  (44子コメント)

And that shit has been proven wrong over and over. Videogames don't cause violence, books don't cause violence, movies don't cause violence.

This is the same bullshit being spouted at every fucking generation.

[–]rKremlin 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Its about control.

[–]Nebulose11 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Exactly. Control the language, or expression of it, control the thoughts.

[–]Res_Gestae 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

This was the primary argument against porn back in the day. Almost all supreme court precedent on obscenity came from porn theaters trying to street advertise. There was a general policy towards reducing their ability to advertise and destroy their consumer base.

The invention if home video ended all if that.

[–]malcomte 4ポイント5ポイント  (35子コメント)

I think people acting out their fucked up shit on robots that look like humans is in the same vein as psychopaths violently acting out on animals.

The problem is that a rapist's compulsion isn't only sexual, but one based in the need to inflate the rapists sense of power over other humans.

[–]AbsentThatDay 44ポイント45ポイント  (13子コメント)

I used to repair copiers and found that several of my clients had beaten their machines regularly. If human-copier relations are any indication, those same folks went home to abuse their wives and children.

[–]BovineUAlum 23ポイント24ポイント  (6子コメント)

Maybe if you had fixed the goddam PC LOAD LETTER error, that wouldn't happen.

[–]Jeryhn 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Seriously, what the fuck does that mean?

[–]Mysteryman64 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

I know Office Space reference, but for the curious, it means that the paper tray (PC = paper cassette, aka paper tray), needs to be loaded with letter sized paper.

[–]Jeryhn 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

You're like the kind of unicorn that can also set the clock on a VCR, aren't you?

[–]Mysteryman64 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fuck no. Those things run on straight up dark magic.

[–]INomYou 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Display blamer!! Its like you're violating my paper trays all over again.

[–]Geoclizhae 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Could also be one of a few ways to vent.

[–]AbsentThatDay 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sir there are sufficient fans and vents designed into the machine for it to operate properly.

[–]FFXIV_Machinist 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

to be fair, copiers are total asshats. have you not seen office space?

[–]Paid_Internet_Troll 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

That fax machine got what it deserved!

[–]autistitron 20ポイント21ポイント  (14子コメント)

Literally the same thing has been said about video games for over 10 years.

[–]Tvayumat 14ポイント15ポイント  (2子コメント)

Well, WELL over a mere decade.

There is never any shortage of people willing to blame the human condition on the latest mode of escapism.

[–]wolfofoakley 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

maybe its the fact we are fucking animals and will act like them.

[–]Tvayumat 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Frankly, it's amazing that we are even capable of concepts like morality, ethics, and culture.

They are the exception to the rule, not the rule, and they are what seem to set us aside from the animal kingdom despite our undeniable place in it.

We're capable of determining the difference between fantasy and reality, too.

Well, most of us are, at least. I think the problem is that there are some of us who get confused at the juxtaposition and proceed to project their confusion onto everyone else.

"The natural state" is indeed a brutal, violent one. Every single time we don't sink into it we're defying the odds. If we were as totally reactive and enslaved to our animal instincts as the alarmists want us to believe, culture and society would simply never have existed.

[–]TerriblyDroll 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

2254: Tensions build as Robosapiens around the world and distant colonies demand civil right protections.

[–]zndrus 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Isn't the solution to this not banishing any and all things from society that might contribute to or be abused by the malicious behaviors of the psychologically deviant/unstable, and instead focusing on treating and addressing the psychologically deviant themselves, and understanding what actually causes such behaviors to exist?

"Uh oh, a tiny fraction of the population might abuse this. Better toss this invention/progress/idea in the bin. What, you mean treat the actual problem? Nah, that's too difficult." Fucking stupid.

[–]Paid_Internet_Troll 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

The problem is that a rapist's compulsion isn't only sexual, but one based in the need to inflate the rapists sense of power over other humans.

So, give them a machine to rape at home, and a school administrator's job during the day, so they can arrest kids who made clocks to get their power fix.

Problem solved. :/

[–]YawningLittleBitch 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The problem is that a rapist's compulsion isn't only sexual, but one based in the need to inflate the rapists sense of power over other humans.

Damn straight.

[–]Maldras 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

What about little red books?

[–]Zandivya 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well Mao did screw a number of women. Maybe he would have liked to have a robot handy.

[–]bsutansalt 22ポイント23ポイント  (2子コメント)

Considering the fact all sexual crime has plummeted since the advent of internet porn, their claims are unlikely to be validated. If anything history tells us giving people an outlet for their sexual energies and kinks lowers the prevalence of crimes associated with said proclivities.

[–]capnjack78 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

So it's no more than a "please think of the children" appeal to emotion. How do you think companies will respond to that?

[–]ThreeTimesUp 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The sex robots would encourage rapists and pedophiles to develop their deviant behavior further, and inevitably, many will move on from robots to live victims

So, they're saying it's just like ''marijuana leads to taking hard drugs', huh?

[–]FFXIV_Machinist 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

sorry but according to the general feminist agenda, and the "Schrondigers rapist" argument, all men are rapists until the day they die.

[–]Trauma_Zulu 49ポイント50ポイント  (11子コメント)

She's got some serious issues if she is worried about competing with a robot.

[–]dubslies 7ポイント8ポイント  (6子コメント)

I don't know, I mean, can you imagine a robot that was nearly indistinguishable from a real woman? I'm sure it's quite a ways off, but that has the capability of reducing the dating scene quite a bit. Why spend countless hours (and money) trying to score when you can just pick up a sex bot and have it do whatever it is you want to do? Seeking a genuine relationship rather than just a fuck buddy are different.

And at the very least, we might see wealthy people having a lot less kids as they are too busy mounting their sex toys while poor/middle-class people have to do things the natural way.

[–]Trauma_Zulu 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

Actually kids are a gigantic financial burden, none of my successful friends are thinking about kids. if I had a kid I wouldn't be headed to medical school at almost 30. Also, as far as the sex bots, females can do the same thing if they wish, vibrators are probably more popular than fleshlights, I'm assuming. What I think this will mean is less kids overall, which is a fantastic thing for our planet. We're already a few billion over the limit, or at least we are compared to how many resources we use and pollutants we each create, which can be remedied by being more eco-friendly and stopping the usage of fossil fuels. What I'm trying to say is perhaps this is a good thing, sexually frustrated or abusive people will have something to calm them down without endangering anyone else and we'll have less kids. Sounds like a win-win to me.

[–]NormalBG 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

You'll need to define 'sexually frustrated or abusive people' down to the atom, especially in the south and Texas. Old farts and fartetttes who make the rules, haven't seen a naked body in 50 years want to hear all the details with 'appropriate' pictures and movies ti 'help' explain. You know..

[–]zndrus 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

That's an entirely different discussion than what we're having here though, isn't it?

It's not "An android that is functionally and behaviorally indistinguishable from an actual human", which in itself brings a whole host of concerns and discussions - see the countless volumes of discussions and concerns on the rise of artificial intelligence and manufactured sentience, and the implications of "banning" what would be a sentient and arguably living being from the right to existence or free will - but a robot whose function is to provide sexual gratification/release.

I can't help but facepalm over the basic presumption by the Author that such sex robots would exclusively exist to "service" men.

What about women? Women are not sexual objects, for sure. They're living, feeling, thinking, conscious humans as well, but they also have sexual desires and urges. In my experience and understanding, they are comparable to men in this respect, despite the stereotypes that persist in modern society. Just look at the MASSIVE industry that exists specifically to address the demand for female sex devices (and lubes and oils and outfits and erotic literature etc).

We have the real use of women and children in the real world (as sex objects)

This is true. Men (and boys) are also subject to this.

this [sex robots] kind of paraphernalia reinforces that message

Debatable, but for the sake of argument let's assume that's true. In who does this kind of technology generate or exacerbate this kind of behavior (the "use" and perception of people as the sexual objects)?

Is the presumption that this is going to turn mentally stable people into pedophiles, rapists, and other sexual deviants? And if so, why is the nature of the discussion implying that only men will be at fault/susceptible to this?

The problem is not the robots, sexual devices, or the like, but the select few that are mentally unstable. They are the ones that should be addressed as the problem, and something most definitely should be done about treating them. A good first step would be admitting that the issue is neither gender specific, or purely the fault of technology itself. And let's not immediately jump to cramming pills down their throat or tossing them in jail. Let's focus on finding actual treatment and prevention methods and determining what we, as a society, can do to address the problem of rape and other non-consensual or uncivilized sexual behaviors. We can start by not making this a gendered issue.

EDIT: fixed typos and clarified a few things.

[–]messybedhead 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

The wealthy are already having less children. How do you think they got wealthy, by spitting out 10 kids and collecting welfare?

[–]dubslies 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Bad word choice on my part. I was thinking more like the top 5% (so from wealthy to pretty well off?) and by 'less kids' I meant just even less than now.

[–]WhompWump 22ポイント23ポイント  (3子コメント)

There's a classic comic about this but I don't have it

Where there's a guy who's a loser and he's being mocked and called a creep by a girl so then he's off to the side making himself a robot and then after he makes it the girl calls screams they should be banned but he doesnt care at all and just enjoys his sexbot

lets not lie there are people out there that have absolutely no chance and if this can fulfill that human need for companionship then who is it hurting?

[–]continuousQ 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

lets not lie there are people out there that have absolutely no chance and if this can fulfill that human need for companionship then who is it hurting?

Those who need to see other people suffer.

[–]Nebulose11 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Those who need to see other people suffer.

Most women.

[–]dualplains 64ポイント65ポイント  (5子コメント)

Have you guessed the name of Billy's planet? It was Earth! DON'T DATE ROBOTS!!

[–]HookahComputer 48ポイント49ポイント  (4子コメント)

I could look up that reference, but I'd rather make out with my Marilyn Monroe-bot

[–]EightEqualEqualD 16ポイント17ポイント  (2子コメント)

Adrienne Barbeaubot

[–]benh141 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

Dwight D. Eisenhowerbot

[–]chafedinksmut 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Miyabi Isshikibot, Yulia Novabot

[–]INomYou 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

She can look it up for you...she has blonde hair but bluetooth.

[–]camelCaseOrGTFO 20ポイント21ポイント  (1子コメント)

Finally someone is talking about the real issues.

[–]Ghost4000 9ポイント10ポイント  (5子コメント)

If it's real AI could you ban it anyway? Wouldn't it be indistinguishable from a human in terms of be in self aware and intelligent. I think if we get ai like that sex is the least of our concerns.

[–]AbsoluteRunner 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

You could. But an AI may not have the same goals as a human. I doubt an AI's goals would be to be entertained, to reproduce (hopefully not), And most importantly, greed for more resources (this is money, power, food). As long as the AI cannot self edit it's primary objectives, it wouldn't be able to strive for those goals which conflict with humans.

[–]HighClassProletariat 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Damn robosexuals! Proposition Infinity will never pass!

[–]chafedinksmut 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

This entire thread is fucking awesome.

[–]LocoRooster 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why do people constantly think no one should be able to do anything they don't like themselves... mind your own business.

[–]ThePenultimateOne 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

So am I the only one who thinks that we shouldn't ban things based exclusively on moral outrage?

[–]Pinworm45 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

Women have all of the sexual power right now - they can load up tinder on their phone and instantly choose the 9+/10 they want to fuck them - and it's clear some are scared they will lose that power.

They really don't need to worry. A robot will never, ever suffice or match a real woman. They have all the power now and they'll continue keeping it in the new technological world. Perhaps it's time they had their time. It's miserable being a disgusting cripple, though! But what can you do. I can not hate women for wanting the best for themselves

However.. please don't take away my sex robots. It's literally the only way some disabled people can have sex. Not even just me, luckily I am able to generally do okay with women. But there are countless disabled and hurting people out there that just have nothing. I know their pain. This can stop it. So fuck off, yeah?

[–]zingbat 12ポイント13ポイント  (3子コメント)

Why don't they just ban sex toys that use a battery? /s

[–]angry_cabbie 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why stop at batteries? I mean, if we did that, they'd just make sexbots that plug directly into the wall, like they already have for vibrators.

[–]AlabasterBear 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Kathleen Richards is an idiot.

[–]TheMemeRepo 12ポイント13ポイント  (10子コメント)

Would someone please think of the children!

[–]piitza 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

if women are so worried about guys who only want sex buying those things, i don't get why you'd be worried. You wouldn't have those guys just trying to bang you and walking away.

Sexbots are a great idea. I hope they eventually imitate everything about sex, the feel, the sounds, etc.

I think more women are afraid they won't be desired because they don't want to compete. Sex is one of the things they control for the most part, and don't wanna lose that bargaining chip.

Just my opinion anyway.

[–]FFXIV_Machinist 20ポイント21ポイント  (9子コメント)

oh no, another extreme "feminist" who is actually a misandrist. so the counter logic to this would be : artificial insemination lowers the demand for men, therefore artificial insemination should be banned and all women should have to have children through standard coital means.

personally i couldnt care less if men move towards synthetic companions/adoptions, and women move towards artificial insemination/synthetic companions.

[–]userdrone 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you for being the first person here to recognize that this goes both ways. There are many women who would welcome a synthetic companion/sex partner.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Her whole argument seems to be "women are only useful for sex, so taking that away from them is an attack on women because they have nothing to offer a man other than a collection of moist holes."

[–]FFXIV_Machinist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

i've found that feminists dont think very highly of other women....

[–]jimmyolsenblues 27ポイント28ポイント  (8子コメント)

However, Dr Kathleen Richardson, a senior research fellow in the Ethics of Robotics, at De Montfort University in Leicester, England, wants to ban the development of sex robots, stating it is unnecessary and undesirable.

I bet $1000 Kathleen caught her guy watching porn.

[–]Bored_Office_Girl 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

robot porn, no doubt.

[–]incest_spells_nicest 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

Where is this robot porn? I want to, uh, warn my church to stay away from it.

[–]ILike2TpunchtheFB 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

google 3d cyborg porn. youre welcome

[–]egonil 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have also heard from a friend that there might be Japanese hentai porn that falls under that genre.

[–]dangrullon87 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Her BF told her quick put on this droid mask and get into bed. oooh baby

[–]PigeonsOnYourBalcony 9ポイント10ポイント  (2子コメント)

So we shouldn't be developing this technology because it will make men less likely to date real women? If you are such a vapid person that people en masse would choose a robot over you than banning the technology won't help you get any dates.

Its like the whole Uber issue, taxis want to ban them because they are a new option that is taking away their business but if taxis improved their service than they wouldn't need to worry about sex robots taking their jobs.

[–]Jeryhn 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wait, sex robots are driving taxis now? No wonder so many people want to ban Uber.

[–]angry_cabbie 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

For the most part, we don't want to ban Uber. We want Uber to play under the same rules we have to (personally, not all of rules, but quite a few). Otherwise, they're just another gypsy cab, and that's been something that we're usually against anyway.

[–]Redditadminsrbad 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I would prefer to have sex with a robot, when I'm done I can turn it off with out having to deal with any bull shit.

[–]Bored_Office_Girl 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

I mean, I've watched A.I.

If my sex robot looked like Jude Law I ain't mad at it...

[–]LEMMESMELLDATBOOTY 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

muh triggers. fuckin neckbeard.

[–]tier19345 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Because university academics are experts on having sex right?

[–]Paid_Internet_Troll 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Particularly hideous ones.

[–]SunBelly 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I've never been into sex dolls, however, if they could make them like that sexy Korean Cylon on Battlestar Galactica, I would be down.

[–]WhizWit21 14ポイント15ポイント  (2子コメント)

Why do we need sex toys with AI? Do I really need another vagina bossing me around? That's why I wanted the sex toy in the first place.

[–]Unavillafied 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well I guess it depends on what your into...

[–]johnr83 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Then you program the AI to be submissive.

[–]The_Time_Master 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

However, Dr Kathleen Richardson, a senior research fellow in the Ethics of Robotics, at De Montfort University in Leicester, England, wants to ban the development of sex robots, stating it is unnecessary and undesirable.

Why would a woman be threatened by robots?

http://i.imgur.com/UwLnBd9.gif

[–]gonnaupvote3 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't want a sex robot with AI... she would leave me for a better man

I want a subservient sex robot who thinks I'm amazing

[–]AstralD 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

I worry because as an imperfect woman, it would make it nigh impossible for me to find a partner if I ever had to again. I also would be hard pressed to buy a male version for myself. I have always dreaded loving something that is forced to - programmed to - love me back. Someone who didn't choose it... Didn't choose me.

On the other hand, there are countless people this would help. Ranging from those with social difficulties, to disabled people and those who've lost spouses - there is an enormity of good to be done here. If all that good makes me a little more uncomfortable, I believe I can overcome that.

Sexbots would have countless applications besides sex. For example, helping to care for the elderly - they would always be polite, incapable of losing patience. Helping in the house of a busy family. Caring for kids while parents are working. They'll be able to be programmed to do anything after all. I don't want me or my insecurities to stand in the way of helping many others.

[–]angry_cabbie 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

First, don't think of it as a robot, think of it as a top-of-the-line vibe almost exclusively for men. I mean, look at some of these toys. Think about a Sybian. These are just high-end sex toys. And for what it's worth, what people like this woman are saying about sexbots, a lot of people used to say about vibrators just a few decades ago.

Second, bots won't love. They may be programmed to emulate certain actions, maybe even certain words or phrases, but the Uncanny Valley, if nothing else, will make sure we don't, overall, emotionally get overtaken by these bots (....or maybe this is one of my few hopeful moments about humanity...).

Third, the hardest part of finding a partner is accepting yourself for who you are. Work on that, and a lot of the difficulty should fall away (...after a few years, I should warn).

Fourth, sexbots aren't nany-droids. Robotics, as much as we've been working on them, are nowhere near close enough (as far as I'm aware) for full-scale, mass-produced, 100% lifelike bots that can take care of any facet of the human life. These are essentially really good mannequins with built-in Fleshlights. That's all.

[–]iammandalore 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Well this explains that weird writing prompt the other day...

[–]gnovos 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

We're more likely to ban useless "university academics" first.

[–]Lylac_Krazy 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I wonder if the money shot would be 10w-30?

[–]Paid_Internet_Troll 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Finally, someone with real questions about sexbots.

[–]cajual 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

So, would robots choose to be homosexual?

[–]Nichleu 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Robophobia - calling it now, if no one else has so far in this thread.

[–]gym00p 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good luck banning away sex bots. I can't see it happening. There'll be an immense market for these things in the coming years, as the population continues to boom and more and more youth grow up socially awkward due to the overuse of social media in lieu of face to face human interactions.

Plus, no strings attached man, woohoo!

[–]QueuedeSpool 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Says a university academic

Wow. Real nice credentials there.

[–]VikingRevenant 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

This idiot needs to shut up. I'd love to have a fuckbot.

[–]leakysprockets 17ポイント18ポイント  (1子コメント)

You say university academic, I say militant feminist.

Feminists have been fighting for control of their bodies for decades only to turn around and try to control the sex lives of men. What a fucking joke.

[–]CableDogOne 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Feminists have been fighting for control of their bodies for decades in order to control the lives of men.

Fixed that for you.

[–]bsutansalt 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you're so afraid you'll be replaced by a robot, then it's time to do some serious introspection about what you bring to the table. The lack of self-awareness of these feminists is appalling, but then what else is new?

[–]bazooka_matt 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think Japan already has these. Also dating a robot way cheaper than regular dating, even if the robot is like $300k. Plus you can watch TV, drink, smoke, and it won't bitch at you.

[–]frewfrew 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

amortized, it's probably still WAYYYY cheaper than dating, and then marrying. of course, you'll need to add in the cost of a microwave and dry cleaning. . . .

[–]cipahs 4ポイント5ポイント  (13子コメント)

I'm tall, good looking, in extremely good shape, fucking aesthetic braj hell my serratus look like they were carved by the gods on mount Olympus huuuurrr hurrr

But if i had a sex robot, i'd probably not go to the gym so much, probably just do a mix of HIIT and compound movements, probably spend less on supplements, probably would buy less cloths, go out less, drink less, play more video games, i wouldnt go to grad school. Probably just find a chill job, go hiking and hunting with the boys and relax.

Bring the sex robots.

[–]WhompWump 0ポイント1ポイント  (11子コメント)

If the only thing leading you to do any of that is "gurls" thats pretty sad

[–]Dargok 8ポイント9ポイント  (7子コメント)

It's the only reason I started going to a gym again.

Everyone needs some motivation and that is a pretty standard one.

[–]TheFunBurglar 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

You could probably make a pile of money by creating a sexbot that rewarded you for completing goals like going to the gym.

[–]WhompWump 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

lifting for girls is setting sail for fail

[–]Dargok 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Whatever gets your ass out the door is better than nothing. Maybe it isn't the best leg to stand on, but if it works, good.

[–]comp2205 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

But it's obviously better than not lifting or working out at all.

[–]cipahs 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I lift six days a week for girls, body building.

If I had a sex robot I'd probably do compound lifts three days a week and pickup basketball, hiking, hiit the other days.

[–]frewfrew 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

right. because 95% of marketing to men isn't based on "chicks will dig you if you use this product".

[–]truthhurts4444 38ポイント39ポイント  (93子コメント)

Of course it's a woman calling for a ban of sex robots. Women know that if men can get sex from a robot instead of a woman, men will never need women again. The only power women have over men is through their vagina

[–]i_smell_my_poop 74ポイント75ポイント  (6子コメント)

Men wouldn't buy nice homes if they could get laid in a cardboard box.

[–]TheFunBurglar 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Maybe that hundredth robot is programmed to fuck on a pile of trash.

[–]frewfrew 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

someone would buy it. . .

[–]Kind_Of_A_Dick 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

That's not true at all. We also like to compete with each other a lot. Think of trophy wives for a moment. The trophy wife usually isn't the goal, she's just another accessory to signify status and power. You show her off to your friends and business partners so you look more successful than yesterday. They aren't the end goal, just something shiny to acquire on the way.

[–]iaruoksid 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

Women know that if men can get sex from a robot instead of a woman, men will never need women again.

You're life must be really shitty if all you want in life from women is sex.

[–]armdrag2youback 39ポイント40ポイント  (11子コメント)

As inelegant as you make it sound I agree with your core point God society would fucking explode if men all of the sudden could receive all their sexual gratification needs without having to exert the normal effort. Funny thing is when you point out the very real discrepancy in the amount of effort men have to put out compared to women it becomes a gender issue for some. I've had women straight up try and tell me it was as hard for women to find dates as men, which just shows how oblivious some women are to the advantages they get sexually based on their gender.

[–]Nebulose11 15ポイント16ポイント  (4子コメント)

Fat women complain about a one week dry spell of not getting laid by randoms.

Some men would kill to have sex once a year.

[–]Kind_Of_A_Dick 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's also the possibility of differences in mate selection. Guys are, according to a study I recall reading a few years ago here, more appearance based and women more personality based in their attraction. So the guys that aren't getting laid could be passing up many opportunities just because they don't find them attractive enough to consider. The women will drop their drawers for an attractive guy, but they might also go for the somewhat ugly funny guy if he knows how to talk to them.

[–]NimbleStorm 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because those men that aren't getting laid simply don't exist to women. They think men have just as easy of a time because the men they DO see are the top percentage of men. To a woman, If you're not attractive, then you might as well not exist.

[–]derpcaptain 17ポイント18ポイント  (0子コメント)

Of course it's a woman calling for a ban of sex robots. Women know that if men can get sex from a robot instead of a woman, men will never need women again. The only power women have over men is through their vagina

Holy shit dude. Wow

[–]SquatThot 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't forget the artificial wombs we're building either ;).

[–]Stargos 3ポイント4ポイント  (57子コメント)

Why do women need men?

[–]SunSage 19ポイント20ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sperm donors and manual labor.

[–]largaxis 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Money, sperm and validation.

[–]CableDogOne 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

To support them financially, take the fall for them legally, provide children for them, etc.

[–]Paid_Internet_Troll 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Offshore oil rig crew-ing, deep sea fishing boat crew-ing, nuclear power plant operating, chemical engineering, electrical engineering, garbage collection, carpentry, bricklaying, plumbing, lumberjacking, auto mechanic-ing, arctic exploration, coal mining, sewer maintenance, air traffic control, forest firefighting, and a few other minor tasks.

[–]NimbleStorm 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sperm, war, manual labor, validation, money, pretty much any major technological advancements.

I'd like to see a woman invent some technology while handing a man some money and a compliment while she's lifting an 80lb bag of cement into a mixer all while shooting jizz from an AR15.

[–]SquatThot 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

To die for their right to bitch about the patriarchy.

[–]GamerToons 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

My wallet would have been fatter back in the day

[–]stillclub 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The only power women have over men is through their vagina

or ya know company, companionship...that whole love thing. But apparently they are just fuck holes to you

[–]CrayonOfDoom 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Whole lotta statements that need citations in that article.

[–]SkyIcewind 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

You fucking monsters how dare you take this dream away from us.

[–]continuousQ 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's plenty of human reproduction going on, anything to reduce the default mode of accidental or careless reproduction is a boon.

And if this as a staple is 50 years away, by then we'll only have a greater need to reduce reproduction, with people living even longer lives. While robots should have humans covered on doing all the mundane tasks they need done for them.

[–]dethb0y 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

What a fucking weird thing to worry about. Guy's got way to much time on his hands.

[–]ChairfaceChip 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is just some woman who doesn't want to have to decide for herself whether or not to rent a fuckbot.

[–]Jabawocky 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

So you're saying it would reduce some of the female leverage over men? No wonder they want it to be illegal

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wonder what her response would be using the same basic logic to a proposed ban on vibrators.

[–]vegetarianrobots 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

This robosexuality is an abomination and an afront to basic programing.

[–]Loki-L 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I find it telling that this 'woman' is not primarily concerned with such things as the ethically implications of artificially created sex-slaves or stuff like that, but her main argument has absolutely nothing to do with AI or robots but is the same argument that 'people' like her have applied to ban porn and sex-toys for generations.

None of those 'is men have sex with robots they won't settle down and father children' requires some AI robot, the same argument could (and has been) made against anything from a prostitute to a flesh-light to a vintage Playboy magazine.

This 'academic' is not concerned at all by all the new stuff that sex-bots would bring but concentrates solely on moral scares that predate the telegraph.

I would be far more concerned by the ethical implications of creating robots to live out fantasies that it would immoral and illegal to live out even with a willing partner.

Of course the AI bit is thankfully rather unnecessary as sex-toys won't have to be that good at impersonating a real person anymore than porn tends to rely on good actors. You will need AI for creating companions that help against loneliness not for sex-toys.

[–]H37man 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Hopefully the robots will become smart enough and self aware enough to make that decision on there own.

[–]frewfrew 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

maybe. I guess if they can't get pregnant and blackmail a man into marriage, they'd still sell.