because the original point is so ridiculous

Let's see. The post from OP says

"Instead of leaking girl's nudes, why don't you leak the screenshot of you begging for them?"

And this is described by OP as a "burn".

"Instead of leaking girl's nudes, why don't you leak the screenshot of you begging for them?" implies that the same person who leaks the nudes had begged for them before leaking them. This is evidence that the leaker's strategy to acquire the nudes (begging) worked, otherwise he would not have anything to leak in the first place. Therefore there is no "burn" here, because exposing a strategy that obviously worked is not a "burn".

Now, please give me a rational explanation why this logic is "ridiculous".

I imagine it was more rhetorical, also.

I like answering rhetorical questions :)