I am not responsible for eating a cow. I may be responsible (given your assumtion) for aggravating the people who then ate the cow, but it wasn't me putting the cow up to my mouth nor did I pay for other people to slaughter a cow for me. Responsibility for something is a sliding scale. The slaughter houses have the most responsibility for the slaughtering of cows, next responsible are the people who support those slaughterhouses by paying their money. Finally you could say I am partially responsible for aggravating them. Would an argument like that hold up in court though. A made B angry and so B payed C to commit D. Therefore A holds the most responsibility. Lets look at it in terms of myself "I made this meat eater angry through my words so he paid McDonnalds to kill animals to feed him. Therefore I am equally responsible for the slaughter of the animals" Now in terms of hiring hitmen. "I made a rich Muslim so angry through this movie I put out that he decided to pay a group of terrorists to commit acts of terrorism, by bombing an embassy. Therefore I am responsible for the act of terrorism" Your logic is absurd and would not hold up in the court of law.