全 181 件のコメント

[–]AnalLeak [スコア非表示]  (33子コメント)

...to fill a gallon of milk? None. It's already full. Fucking plebs

[–]GenericUsername16 [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

How do you conceptually even fill a gallon of milk?

How much shit does it take to fill 650g of helium? Doesn't even make sense.

[–]nikolaibk [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Pour the milk in a bowl. Inflate a balloon. Put the balloon on top of the milk so it creates a bowl shape. Put everything on the freezer. Retrieve it once it's frozen. Pop the balloon.

Now you have a solid milk bowl which you can fill.

[–]lemonsracer [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Holy shit dude. Did you take adderal?

[–]ThatsSciencetastic [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Holy shit dude

NORMIES GET OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

[–]lemonsracer [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Normie

Don't you mean newfag? I think you're the normie faggot.

[–]ThatsSciencetastic [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Implying

No, I mean normie. Newfag goes without saying. This is fucking /r/4chan.

[–]lemonsracer [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

This is fucking /r/4chan

Holy fuck. Really? I didn't know. Who is 4chan? I guess I should go back to /r/funny

[–]ThatsSciencetastic [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

You're the one trying to be elitist with your 4chins memes.

[–]lemonsracer [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

All of my memes? You mean all one of them? I only used 1, so just singular meme, not plural memes. Plus you're the one that started all this shit.

[–]rhubarbs [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Conceptually? Making a solution is kind of like filling one thing with another thing.

[–]MarcusRivers [スコア非表示]  (14子コメント)

What if I drink the semen...wait, no. The MILK! THE MILK!! I meant to say the milk! I'm not a fag! I'M NOT A FAAAAAGGGGGG!!!!

[–]ponkzy [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

please we all know you've tasted your semen multiple times. even that one time you ate pineapple for a week to see if it changed flavor

[–]skyman724/mu/ [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

It's okay.

It's gainz either way.

[–]HornyTerminator/b/ [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Exactly. Protein is protein, we don't judge.

[–]Lurkerphile [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You gonna go pick out a pumpkin next? What are you? A FAG?

[–]290077 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

There's a little bit of space at the top

[–]funblasta [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

this guy is a philosopher and a player.

[–]jodon [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

no, I think the question is; How much semen would it take to saturate one gallon of milk? That would be a fairly complex question. We would need information about the temperature of the milk, is it room temperature or fridge temperature? I would also imagine the fat percentage of the milk in question would mater as the fat would compete with the sperm for saturation. As I have a hard time finding saturation tables for milk I think we would also have to start this with a experimentation phase to figure out the saturation properties of milk.

[–]jellyberg [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Roughly 20 seamen, which is the same as the crew on a USS Missouri.

[–]time_to_despair [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

You're forgetting about the "roughly" part. Semens is rougher than milk.

[–]gm2 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That's a very good point you have there, AnalLeak.

[–]AintCARRONaboutmuch [スコア非表示]  (52子コメント)

Normal Sperm Concentration 48 Million Sperm/mL of semen

Average Ejaculate Size = 2.5mL

1 Gallon = 3785.41mL

3785.41mL/2.5mL = 1,514.16 Ejaculations

1,514 Ejaculations x 48 Million Sperm = ~73 Billion Sperm

Normal Sperm Motility = 63%

Normal Sperm Morphology = 12%

75 Billion Sperm * 12% * 63% = 5.52 Billion Sperm

Estimation of amount of people in China = 1,393,783,836 People

5.52 Billion Sperm/1,393,783,836 People = ~3.97

1 Gallon of Semen could be used to repopulate China about 4 times

edit Now using numbers from Infertility Awareness Association of Canada

[–]Ciremo [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

implying op' sperm is qualitative

[–]zcs90 [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

If we breed everyone in China with OP's sperm will their dicks get even smaller?

[–]Tubaka [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I don't know but they will all get OP's fagotry and then china won't breed anymore and just die out

[–]konechry [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Average spermcount/ml is between 20 and 40 million, not 300 million. Of those about half aren't mobile and only about 10% are of normal morphology.

Don't know where you got your numbers.

[–]Saralentine [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Retarded sperm are still sperm, asshole.

[–]frenchhornhero [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Only a tiny fraction of the sperm that enter a woman even have a chance at fertilizing an egg, and for the most part, the first ones to go are retarded.

[–]Realkers [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yes they are, just as you yourself were once a small retarded sperm.

[–]Heterohom [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Thanks for the math solving, you spergburger.

[–]El_Dumfuco/fit/izen [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

We could repopulate China if you emptied your ass?

[–]SmartAlec105 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I once did the math and it would take about 98 men their entire lives to produce one metric ton of semen. Now whenever someone says "a metric fuckton", you'll understand how much that really is.

[–]realfuzzhead [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You did that wrong, if there are 20M sperm per nut and it takes 48M sperm to make a mL, then each nut is only .4166mL.

[–]MarcusRivers [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Or a gallon of semen could make a great facial.

[–]theblaah [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I'm too lazy to check your math. but thanks for the effort. I'll be in my corner jerking in a bucket.

[–]Patrik333 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Weird coincidence seeing this post today. I was going to do a very similar calculation earlier on, concerning the volume of ejaculate, and also the recharge time, to determine an approximate 'flow rate' so that I could work out how many people I'd need to hire for the ultimate bukkake orgy, such that there would be literal rivers of semen flowing onto my willing body.

[–]Amrealhuman [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

How long would it take to fill 1 gallon up of semen given that 2 people were jacking off twice a day, with average loads?

[–]AintCARRONaboutmuch [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

2 People

2 Loads a Day

2*2 = 4 loads per day

Normal Ejaculate Volume = 2.5mL

4 Ejaculations/Day * 2.5mL = 10.0mL of Semen/day

3785.41mL = 1 Gallon

3785.41mL/10.0mL = 378.5 Days

379 days/365.25 days = 1 Year and 2 weeks

twice a day....that's nothing

[–]crypticfreak [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

What if you had 5 gayniggers who were willing to cum in that gallon jug on the regular? That's 10 ejaculations a day.

[–]AintCARRONaboutmuch [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

4 Ejaculations/10 Ejaculations = 2.5

379 Days/2.5 = 158 Days

152 Days = ~5 Months

This is assuming that their larger penis doesn't effect their Ejaculatory Volume nor their Homosexuality

[–]pandazerg [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

You forgot to account for the high rate of Chinese female infanticide; so saying four times is a bit of a stretch.

[–]Jetmann114/fit/izen [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

impregnating 5.6 billion women

This is my fetish

[–]cranialhemorrhage [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

And this is why I made sure to check the comments this time.

[–]mastersoup [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This only works if OP is chinese, otherwise it'd be impossible for them to remake the chinese population.

[–]plaforga [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Actually it could only take one seaman.

[–]Vamking12 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Amazing I could do that if I had enough porn

[–]alienjin [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

So we could just round it off to about fifteen hundred squirts?

[–]Mogg_the_Poet [スコア非表示]  (57子コメント)

What weighs more?

A gallon of feathers or a gallon of bricks?

Wait shit.

[–]THE_BOOTY_BAMBOOZLERmars/hm/ellow [スコア非表示]  (44子コメント)

Gallons are a measure of volume, so I'm gonna say the bricks? Unless you compress the feathers?

Edit: Wow, thanks for the gold, /u/captsalad!

[–]Stonn [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

You can compress both indefinitely until they start to undergo nuclear fusion or eventually become black holes.

[–]Mogg_the_Poet [スコア非表示]  (22子コメント)

That's the "wait shit".

This is typically a "riddle" where you're asked what weighs more:

A kilogram of feathers or bricks?

The answer is they both weigh a kilogram.

[–]little_lamplight3r [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

Actually, a kilogram of feathers' weight is bigger than that of bricks. Thing is, Archimedes' principle on buoyancy works for gases as well. Feathers take more space than bricks, thus displacing more air, which makes its actual weight bigger.

[–]GaussWanker [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Kilogram is mass, weight is force of gravity on mass. Theoretical weight would not, but apparent weight would take into account the displaced air volume (thus making a kilogram of feathers appear heavier if weighed with high precision but in a non-vacuum).

Unless the kilogram of feathers is arranged in such a high stack that the force of gravity can be taken as non-constant, in which case the bricks might become heavier again.

[–]Hennyyy [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

But the feathers receive a bigger uplift/buoyancy from the replaced air, so the apparent weight of the bricks should be more, shouldn't it? That's why the apparent weight of 1kg oxygen in air is pretty small?

[–]CatDaddy5 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I feel like if it's a kilogram of feathers it'll take the variables into effect. But then again you're a faggot so who knows

[–]El_Dumfuco/fit/izen [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

'weight' doesn't take buoyancy into account, it refers to the gravitational force on the body.

[–]Harakou [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Uh, wouldn't it be the other way around? The more fluid you displace, the more upward force from buoyancy.

...Was that the joke?

[–]Phaethon42 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Gonna be that pedantic guy here I guess because I teach physics and I can't let this stand. A kilogram is a measure of mass not weight, they both weigh roughly 9.8 Newtons most places on Earth. Everything else you said is right besides that "weigh a kilogram" bit at the end.

[–]hippityhoppety [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

9.81 Mr. Cut-Rate Scientist

[–]Phaethon42 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Actually that decimal place can vary quite a bit depending on where you are on Earth, hence why I said "roughly."

[–]Blick [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

No. The riddle is

Which weighs more? A pound of feathers, or a pound of gold?

The answer being a pound of feathers because it's measured in ounces, which is 16 oz to a lb. Meanwhile, the standard measurement of precious metals, such as gold, is in troy ounces which is 12 oz to a lb.

[–]Natdaprat [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

You don't have the shiny gold sticker by your name to signify someone spent real money to appreciate your shitty comment. You're a liar!

[–]THE_BOOTY_BAMBOOZLERmars/hm/ellow [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

;))))))))) what r u gonna do about it fuccboi

[–]Cruxion [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

What weighs more?

A pound of feathers or a pound of gold?

[–]MerryMacattackwee/a/boo [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Since the mass isn't set, the answer could be anything

[–]TylerTJ930 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The mass is set you fucking autist. The mass of a feather and brick is pretty standard

[–]RadBradBruh/trv/ [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Might be able to rub one out into a full gallon of milk without overflowing. There's usually that little bit of space in the top.

[–]riverine17 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Okay, but how many days are in a week, so you double count Sunday?

[–]plant-fucker [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

In case anyone's curious, you'd have to jack off roughly 800 times to fill a gallon.

[–]Assy-McGee/Bane?/ [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

And now you know exactly the amount of times Jizzus jerked off in a year to fill each of his two-liters bottles.

[–]Autisticus/vg/ [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

HOW MUCH DO ONE TON OF FEATHERS WEIGH?

God it must be close to like, seventy pounds or something

[–]Stonn [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Same as half a ton of twice as big feathers... but twice!

[–]dummiexx/fa/g [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

0 cause there's a gallon of milk in it

[–]xXsavagewulfXx [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

The real question is, can Anon deliver?

[–]Jameseatscheese [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

In the 1970s there was a rock band called 10cc. When pressed for the meaning of the band's name, it's said that their response was that the average volume of male ejaculate was 10 cubic centimeters.

When you consider that a gallon equates to 3,785.41178 cubic centimeters, then the answer to how many loads does it take to fill a gallon jug is just that number with the decimal point moved one place to the left.

So, by '70s rock standards, it would take 378 and 1/2 average loads to fill a gallon container. So staying hydrated and giving yourself 3 days to replenish the well (which was what my physician recommended when I was a part of a study on male fertility), you could fill this jug in 3 years and 11 days.

[–]Iinventedcaptchas [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

No, you idiots. You don't need any semen to fill a gallon of milk, BECAUSE IT IS ALREADY FILLED WITH MILK. IT'S A GALLON OF MILK.

[–]alrightcomputer [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How many semens does it take to fill a gallon of milk?*

[–]Vihtic [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Theres still milk in it so you could only top it off with semen.

[–]Doublebhn [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It takes 1 drop of cow jizz to make a cow. Then you milk the cow to get a gallon

[–]levurux [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How long would it take to fill it up? That's the real question.

[–]Pungyeon [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Surely this is physics not Math....

[–]BenWhitaker [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Well I mean, since semen has a different density, it might take more or less to fill the gallon jug. This is a perfectly reasonable question if you ask me.

[–]whatburnsnevereturns/fit/ [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Well if the gallon of milk is already a gallon of milk, it would take no semen to fill said gallon of milk. It was a trick question all along.

[–]noisesoff5 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

About as much as your mom sucked out of my cock last night

[–]Peskykin [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

How many loads though hah that's interesting

[–]watersRichard [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

4chan are a bunch idiots. why anybody care?

[–]HarleyLowSpeed [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Say what you want but at least we're banging your mom.