Homosexual prevalence in culture

tryanather · 2ヶ月前

The point is not homosexuality in itself, but deconstruction of a civilization by attacking and removing its prohibitions and its institutions.

If you look at moral specializations in European people, these can be divided into liberal, libertarian and conservative. Of these three only the conservatives have the moral intuitions to put limits on behaviour: this far, but no further. They are the only ones who impose a "membrane" on the culture (cell) and when nobody is providing this function (as today the conservatives are demonized, prohibited from acting), the cell eventually dies.

Curt Doolittle has done work on this and it's quite interesting. here is his most recent interview. Joe Biden tells us that Jews are behind it :).

Elliot_Loudermilk · 2ヶ月前

America is obsessed with identity.

American culture today can be summed up as "Be true to yourself." This translates to, "redefine and reshape your identity by pursuing your ever changing desires."

In the process, people revolt against the structures and institutions that previously defined them, and purchase goods and services that symbolize this transformation to the rest of society.

So religion, sexuality, gender roles, and even biology are on the hit list.

This is why all the hype exists around Bruce Jenner's transformation. "You think he is a he? Well you're wrong- he's a she. Look, she looks fabulous in that outfit ($), with those cosmetics ($), and those new plastic boobs ($$). So take note, she isn't defined by her biology and neither are you. Welcome to the 21st century."

This is why we see the crazies on tumblr calling themselves animal-kin. No reason to believe you were a fox in a previous life other than your own desire that it be so. It's madness-but it's all about identity.

In the absence of the institutions that previously defined man, we are free to pursue our desires, which are much more complicated than we currently understand, and sadly much less fulfilling.

Atavisionary · 2ヶ月前

I feel bad for conservakins who believe that this is what is going to destroy marriage. I mean, I agree with them that marriage is between a man and a woman. Marriage only exists because it has a purpose of supporting intact families. Gays aren't intact families, thus marriage for them isn't legitimate. However, even if a small number of gays marry I doubt that would have much impact. Even if it did, marriage was destroyed already in the 70s with the anti-male laws that were enacted. You can't destroy an institution that has already been destroyed.

MisterKlaw · 2ヶ月前

Congress signs permission to "fast-track" controversial trade bill.

Media goes ape-shit over confederate flag.

Supreme Court gets off their collective ass and issues multiple historic rulings in the span of a week.

Our government is better at sleight-of-hand than David Fucking Copperfield.

trphardmode · 2ヶ月前

I just think it's interesting how prevalent it is in our media and culture, especially when it's accepted only 5-10% of the population are gay or bi. There's something else going on here.

The number is closer to 2-3%, the 10% claim was complete fiction.

xwm · 2ヶ月前

I want to go out on a tangent in order to bring up something significant. Today's result attests to where the court stands on the political rainbow. Cthulhu always swims left.

Experts suggest that President Clinton will have the opportunity to appoint four new justices. The effects will be profound.

Randouem · 2ヶ月前

Just wanted to share this survey that shows just how dominant the prevalence in media is: "Out of 147.5 hours of original programming on ABC Family in the 2013-2014 season, 62.5 hours—42%—featured LGBT characters or story lines."[1] They aren't the only ones: MTV and FX were ahead with 49%, and behind were NBC at 37%, Fox at 36%, ABC at 34%, etc.

[1] http://qz.com/274639/why-abc-family-is-a-leader-in-lgbt-inclusion-on-television/

Guomindang · 2ヶ月前

I think the answer is more political than cultural.

Homosexuality is celebrated by the Left because it's an affront to their increasingly feeble enemies. The repudiation of "heteronormativity" represents a radical victory over traditionalism, so of course they would gloat about it. And by spreading this crusade to all aspects of society, they are further consolidating and signalling their dominance over it. And they have no shortage of status-obsessed allies who will constantly bring up the issue to signal how cool they are, as marketers have noticed.

nyrp · 2ヶ月前

only 5-10% of the population are gay or bi.

More like 2-4%. And they're not all lifers.

RunawayGrain · 2ヶ月前

It's going to be interesting to see if this starts to swing the US courts overall bias towards women back a bit. Generally all a woman has to do in a divorce is claim spousal abuse to win. So what happens when two women get a divorce, and both claim spousal abuse, since that has traditionally been the silver bullet?

Edit: clarity.

Scott555 · 2ヶ月前

You touch on it referencing feminization. Women drive this, as evidenced by the percentage of Bravo viewers that identify as straight and male.

I have a hard time with seeing these trends as conspiracy. I think women recognize this intuitively as an effective sorting mechanism. A kind of oblivious self-interest.

It's another way for them to say, "just be yourself." They're not attracted to feminine males, and this is one way to get the less suitable mates them to out themselves.

balalasaurus · 2ヶ月前

I've seen some interesting comments here but so far I've been surprised that no-one has touched on how this action and the prevalence of homosexuality aside is part of the destruction of the family unit and thus society as a whole. You can bet that soon homosexual couples will be pushing for the same spousal benefits that hetero couples receive. Following that the burden of providing these benefits will become the providence of the state thereby increasing social dependence on it.

What will come next will only be the erosion of civilization as we eventually regress into a police state. It seems far out but that doesn't mean it's not possible or even probable for that matter.

karen_na_reishou · 2ヶ月前

It is about slowly breaking down the once holy marriage.

The basis of the modern world is the nuclear family. A Father, a mother and their children. Children from a nuclear family tend to have been instilled good morals and have had a proper childhood. They rarely fall into degeneracy.

Divorce is pretty bad for children.
Being raised by a single parent is pretty bad.
Being raised by gays is pretty bad.
Being raised by parents of different races can be pretty bad (if the races are dissimilar enough).

I suspect the next step will be to normalize polygamy. It is not a big secret that many gays are polygamous even those officially married. In a few years the cathedral will tell us how much we can learn from gays and their "open-mindedness".

Maybe after that the cathedral will try and legalize peadophillia and beastiality.

ildiz · 2ヶ月前

I personally don't have an issue with homosexuals, I have a friend that is one. I do have a problem with homosexuality being used as the flagship to break down traditional ideals of family, by helping to bolster support for other deviations from norm such as hypergamy, polyamory which draw support from the same base.

Lastly, It was first about legalising homosexuality, then civil partnerships, then marriage next it will be adoption of children. When all is won in this area out they shall go forth to the next, for we all know animal-kin require skin transplant from an otter to live in harmony.

This ever conquering blitzkrieg of lunacy will keep going forward, until people like you and me say enough is enough.

ChiThrowawa · 2ヶ月前

Good that you and other people are starting to realise that gay propaganda is very much a real thing. In the UK we now have show hosts hired for no reason other than they are gay and gay characters added to dramas/cartoons where previously there were none. It is quite deliberately trying to brainwash people of all ages into thinking that a significant proportion of the population are gay.

Think of any other minority and how much attention they receive, or propaganda they spread. I am not anti-gay either but I find the promotion of it disgusting and irritating. Why is orthodox Judaism not promoted in the same way? Why must this particular minority (gays) be treated as special? Why can't this particular minority just keep to themselves and live their lives in peace like all the other minorities?

http://library.gayhomeland.org/0018/EN/EN_Overhauling_Straight.htm

I suspect there are number of old gay guys in the media now, who grew up in an environment hostile to gays, that basically want revenge. They want to turn the tables, normalise gay 'culture' and alienate normal people. And because they're gay and have no family, they can save a ton of money, work hard at their jobs, at gaining power and influence in the media, and what you have today is the media playing government by promoting it's own pro-gay agenda, including trying to destroy the careers/repuations of anyone who doesn't echo the pro-gay rhetoric, but disguising it all as "the voice of the people".

I feel everything points to the existence of pro-gay versions of Rupert Murdoch running the show.

vakerr · 2ヶ月前

What a sad sight, a people that turned from rebels into faggots.

i-raped-aaron-swartz · 2ヶ月前

This is an uninformed OP.

Male homosexuality is not feminine in nature, it's hyper-sexual in a distinctly masculine sense.

Changing a man to basically be a woman, at least in terms of sexual strategy.

Male homosexuals exhibit 0% of anything remotely resembling female sexual strategy.

I also think this is why feminism is so comfortable and 'in bed with' homosexual culture.

Sometimes, but also sometimes not. Many feminists condemn male homosexuality as inherently misogynistic.

Why is homosexuality such a big topic in today's society? It seems to be everywhere in our media, and a major force shaping policy. ... I just think it's interesting how prevalent it is in our media and culture, especially when it's accepted only 5-10% of the population are gay or bi. There's something else going on here.

If you want to learn about the homosexual PR machine a good start is to read After the Ball

bluedrygrass · 2ヶ月前

One additional reason, too often overloocked, is that pervertions and deviations like homosexuality and pedophilia are extremely more diffused between the elites than the masses. It's not clear why, but it's like the more high-functioning an individual is, the more probabilities he has to develop deviations.

As an example, notice how the almost totality of homosexuals are generally smarter than the average population.

[deleted] · 2ヶ月前

Our society is egocentric. Everyone wants to be heard, and everyone's too sensitive to tell someone else "go fuck yourself" when they are attacked. Religion seems to play a big part in it too, which is why feminists are backing the gay movement; religion tends to look down on homosexuality. Feminism and homosexuality go hand in hand in destroying any sense of unadulterated male authority.

Sex is something that's hardly ever spoken about among the masses, just sort of hinted at in small groups, and that kind of mischievous association with a completely natural phenomenon shared by literally everyone leaves it unexplored and, inevitably, feared. In other words, men and women are so afraid of their desires that they need to associate their sexuality with something outside of themselves, yet similar to them: the same sex. It's sort of like an unconscious projection.

That's fine though. It just goes to show that we're not proud to be human anymore.

NeoreactionSafe · 2ヶ月前

Male Homosexuality = Fascism -------- Female Homosexuality = Feminism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Röhm

The two most left wing socialist philosophies are the Fascists and the Feminists. The only thing they have in common is socialism. (manipulation of public opinion) The goals are entirely different, but the indoctrination techniques are the same.

The opposite is the reactionary who is at the rightmost place in the spectrum. To be pure right is in a sense to know god in the fullest expression of Absolute Truth. (to know nature)

Generally things like Monarchy or Aristocratic Republics are pretty close to the natural forces and are therefore closest to Truth.

"There are no enemies to the right."

.

2ヶ月前

[deleted]

2ヶ月前

[deleted]

TiredUnicorn · 2ヶ月前

I think the solution is a lot simpler. I think we live in a culture where we don't ever want to hurt any body's feelings or offend them in any way. Hence political correctness, giving "participation" trophies, playing along with gender pretenders, and the like.

AutoModerator · 2ヶ月前

[deleted]

AutoModerator · 2ヶ月前

[deleted]

hairaware · 2ヶ月前

It seems like a failure overall though for those powers wishing to control men. Gay men are firstly not attracted to women and thus women lose their power over men. Second the gay community is far more tightly linked then the general heterosexual community allowing for more protests even with a smaller force. It also seems like gay males in general take better care of themselves then their straight counterparts allowing them to be more able to fight or protest if need be.

NecroticFury · 2ヶ月前

Some of the most attractive men out there are gay. Meaning that its women that lose out most when it comes to today's decision. Actually, now that I think about it, gay people were always homosexual, meaning nobody looses out in the first place.

Its prevalent in our media because gay people are sick and tired of the bullshit. Now that its socially correct to support homosexuality, everyone does. Its a new generation now with new ideas - less ridged than their parents thats for sure. Its only when a group gets angry enough to take action that everyone else notices there was a problem to begin with.

vakerr · 2ヶ月前

[deleted]

DarkEnlightenment

調停者

Male Homosexuality = Fascism -------- Female Homosexuality = Feminism