I've literally never seen reds with anything against gays. We've even got a sub for LGBTs. It's not popular but that's hardly our fault. It's not like we know queer sexual strategy to contribute and it's not like we advertise the red pill network in general. Near as I can tell though, the only talk we really have of gays is to say positive things about Milo. We certainly have nothing homophobic in the sidebar.
Blue pill though, isn't like that. They spend a lot of time saying shit like making jokes about how many TRPs must still be in the closet or about how gay we are for admiring alphas and muscles and shit. Other than deap seated homophobia, why would blue pill even think that's an insult?
I haven't seen good evidence that there's a strong gay population on the red pill but it's not like we'd reject gays if we found out that they're there. Even if there were a bunch of them, we'd have more or less the same discourse, maybe with slightly more varied points of view, and continue onward. There'd be nothing shameful or insulting about it. Some dudes like dudes and some dudes who like dudes might also like our philosophy. So what?
So blue pill, why do you think that's an insult, or funny, or whatever? I literally cannot come up with ANY explanation other than that BPs a bunch of homophobes who think it's inherently shameful, ridicule worthy, or mockable to be gay.
Inb4: "But RooshV..."
Response: Red pill hates RooshV, RooshV made a video disavowing RP, and blue pill knows that by now.
[–]dundundundonenon-red pill [スコア非表示] (2子コメント)
[–]CisWhiteMaelstromEndorsed Contributor[S] [スコア非表示] (1子コメント)
[–]dundundundonenon-red pill [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]prodigy2throwBreaking Bad oppresses women [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]belletaco [スコア非表示] (3子コメント)
[–]CisWhiteMaelstromEndorsed Contributor[S] [スコア非表示] (2子コメント)
[–]belletaco [スコア非表示] (1子コメント)
[–]dakruNeither [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]dakruNeither [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]SmallSubBot [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)