全 196 件のコメント

[–]edisonlbm 160ポイント161ポイント  (7子コメント)

27 - No matter how many times the word "Landlocked" appears in the title of a post, it's not an update from that guy and you are going to be disappointed.

[–]wouldthewolves 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

wait, which guy?

[–]MiaFeyEsq 72ポイント73ポイント  (2子コメント)

Oh honey. Are you really sure you want to know? It's like a really good TV show that gets cancelled on a cliffhanger.

If you're really sure that's what you want: https://np.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/2ooy1x/update_my_neighbors_caused_themselves_to_be/

[–]Werewolfdad 20ポイント21ポイント  (0子コメント)

Landlocked properties is like legal advice crack.

[–]Tyr_Kovacs 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why did I have to follow that link? Now I'm hooked on that sweet sweet landlocked trip and I already (6 hours later) need a fix.

[–]jennybean42[S] 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm sorry I didn't think of that one myself. Also, Happy Cake Day!

[–]Caffine1 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

I searched news sites for hours trying to find out what happened with that last week.

[–]sisterstigmatic 100ポイント101ポイント  (0子コメント)

There's no such thing as a souvenir cheque.

[–]Hokie95 93ポイント94ポイント  (6子コメント)

23 - Don't omit material facts or (worse) lie about them. Lawyers (and many in /r/legaladvice) tend to have finely tuned BS detectors and will start asking questions if they suspect there is more to the story than your narrative.

[–]frisian2 59ポイント60ポイント  (2子コメント)

24 - listen to advice if r/legaladvice tells you to get an attorny and discuss with him how to aproach the police then don't do that on your own.

25 - Without notice or going to court a landlord cannot evict you.

26 - Witholding rent without consulting a lawyer gets you evicted.

[–]skulldan 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

*attorney

I'm sorry

[–]frisian2 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks for correcting me, my spelling isn't always what it should be.

[–]P-01S 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

23b: you have no client-attorney pro ledge with /r/legaladvice, so don't tell the internet about the crimes youve committed.

23bII: but it's really damn entertaining.

[–]Malort_without_irony 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's bigger than that, really. It's not even about bullshit. It's that a one-sided fact pattern is as rare as a slutty unicorn. There are negative details that you are downplaying because you are on your own side.

[–]MovkeyB 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

tend to have finely tuned BS detectors

lolno so many troll posts

[–]WtfIsWrongWithYou1 50ポイント51ポイント  (1子コメント)

  1. A hastily drawn MS Paint diagram is an essential legal document for any cases involving landlocked property and easements.

  2. When giving out souvenir checks, remember to write "Souvenir" on the check so the teller knows it's just a souvenir check and to not cash it.

[–]P-01S 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think you mean "remember to write 'VOID' on it in huge letters using permanent, wash-proof ink."

[–]ExpiresAfterUse 31ポイント32ポイント  (1子コメント)

31 - If you see a gold fringed flag, it is an illegal court operating under admiraliry law. Feel free to ignore the judge or him. Your call.

32 - Always invest in Bitcoin.

[–]dailyapple 17ポイント18ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is good for maritime law.

[–]Septothorpe 23ポイント24ポイント  (3子コメント)

Nth. The victim doesn't press / drop charges, the prosecutor does. The victim can't really control (but they can influence) what the police decide to do with the evidence presented to them - if they feel like they should arrest the person / go to the prosecutor to have charges filed it can get done even against the victim's wishes.

[–]jennybean42[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes! I meant to include this one. Good call.

[–]Urgullibl 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Careful, there are jurisdictions where the prosecutor needs the victim's consent to prosecute certain (low level) crimes.

[–]P-01S 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

s/prosecutor/district attorney/

[–]LogisticMap 19ポイント20ポイント  (15子コメント)

23. You can drink in public as long as it's out of a muffler or oven mitt. Other car parts or appliances may also work, but you probably shouldn't risk it.

[–]IDontKnowHowToPM 3ポイント4ポイント  (12子コメント)

Oh god, I forgot about muffler guy...

[–]BarackSays 7ポイント8ポイント  (10子コメント)

I loved the thread where the muffler guy showed up to call the OP an idiot.

When the guy who was DRINKING BEER OUT A MUFFLER calls you a moron, you know you've fucked up.

[–]P-01S -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Calling /r/RGFFake! We miss you, Muffler Man. Are you well?

[–]mizmoose 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't forget -- if you use a muffler, you MUST also use a straw!

[–]TheHoundsOFLove 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You guys, last week I saw a guy drinking out of a coffee pot. Not mug, but pot, and I'm pretty sure it wasn't coffee. I thought of this place...

[–]DukeMaximum 15ポイント16ポイント  (19子コメント)

I really really wanted to go to law school, but elected to go to business school instead due to hiring rates, cost, and time. But reading this subreddit nearly daily makes me kind of regret that I didn't go the other way.

Thanks for the summary, OP. It's all good information!

[–]SensibleMadness 31ポイント32ポイント  (11子コメント)

As a lawyer friend once told me: You don't want to be a corporate lawyer, you want to be the guy who hires corporate lawyers. Unless you graduate at the top of your class from a good law school, your career prospects are likely going to be better going into business rather than law.

[–]DukeMaximum 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

I know, that's why I went the way I did. I just wonder. The road not taken and all of that, you know?

[–]paratactical 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Frost's poem is actually about being old, realizing that making a decision was nearly impossible based on what was known, and wanting to (in old age and in stories told to others) justify the results of ones life as the result of a personal choice or aspiration or worth, rather than admitting that it was luck that guided ones life.

Basically, "The Road Not Taken" is the perfect version of "BOOTSTRAPS."

[–]xaxers 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

Actually, he's making fun of one of his wishy-washy friends who pulled that shit with every single choice.

[–]IDontKnowHowToPM 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sarcasm doesn't come across very well in poetry.

[–]PM_ME_YOUR_CHURCH 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

His friend misinterpreted it too - he assumed that "the road less travelled" meant joining the military, and promptly got killed in WWI.

[–]CongressmanDonYoung 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

True. Law is, by its nature, a service profession. We provide a service to customers and we get paid for it; we can potentially make pretty decent money on those fees, but it's hard to get fabulously wealthy in customer service.

In the type of work I do, we serve as legal counsel to issuer of and buyers of tax exempt debt securities. We get our fees, but I've realized that the people making the real money are the investment bankers who underwrite these deals. We, as attorneys, are just a cost of doing business.

It's an interesting trade, but attorneys are not the ones in charge. We work for the guys who make the decisions.

[–]Malort_without_irony 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

We work for the guys who make the decisions.

The counterpoint is that, as the not-in-charge service provider, there's not skin in the game. The client loses their house or goes to jail or crashes the business. The lawyer gets paid all the same.

[–]CongressmanDonYoung 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's very true. It's a good profession for the risk averse. My boss is one of the most cautious people I know. She is happy to let others take the risk.

[–]Caffine1 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Most of the attorneys that I know that are really really wealthy have a business on the side.

[–]King_Posner 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

it isn't a bad idea to invest in such when you are able to, using the constant attorney stream to live on while the buisness slowly chugs to life. then, invest again, and again, and so on.

[–]Caffine1 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Having knowledge of the law helps a lot, especially when setting up a business. Knowing what type of entity to create, how to properly protect your intellectual property (even if it's just knowing to go talk to a patent attorney), and knowing how to access and apply the applicable laws puts you at a major advantage, especially during the early stages where having to hire an attorney might not be possible because of the cost. IP issues are especially costly if not set up properly from the start.

[–]8337 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

The only good reason to go to law school these days is because you love law. But isn't that a good enough reason?

[–][削除されました]  (3子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]chaosakita 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Isn't it even harder to get into a good MBA program than a good law school? It's like top 6 MBAs vs t14 law schools.

    [–]DukeMaximum 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yeah, but given my undergraduate record, I wasn't going to be going to Harvard School of anything.

    [–]A_Crazy_Canadian 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I think its lower risk. Almost any MBA will give you at least some benefits, while a lower quality Law degree is likely to be worthless.

    [–]silverrain64 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It's a good enough reason to go to law school. The question is, is it a good enough reason to take on undischargeable debt?

    [–]dothemath 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I'm with you - was accepted to law school then got a job offer from a global consulting firm and couldn't say no.

    Still - the law amuses me, and there are so many sarcastically written opinions out there that I wonder why anyone ever buys a work of fiction. /r/legaladvice amps that up to 11.

    [–]Felinomancy 55ポイント56ポイント  (23子コメント)

    27. if stopped by a state-sponsored jackbooted thugs cop, loudly ask, "am I being detained?". Enjoy seeing him wilt and stutter "n-no" before walking away like a boss.

    28. all legal documents are not valid unless if spells your name in CAPITAL LETTERS.

    29. if forced to go to court, loudly ask the judge about how "you never consented to the laws that you are charging me with". Drop the mic and yes, again, walk away like a boss.

    [–]OneRedSent 24ポイント25ポイント  (4子コメント)

    And if your name is misspelled even by one letter, you're scot free.

    [–]Azuranski 33ポイント34ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Well no, you're still Scott Free, but your name is just misspelled and it just won't fly in court!

    [–]Muspel 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

    It's a miracle, mister.

    [–]utnapishtim 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I wish I could upvote that harder.

    [–]Urgullibl 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Especially if your name has gold fringes.

    [–]Flywolfpack 10ポイント11ポイント  (7子コメント)

    Everything is legal if there's gold fringes on the flags.

    [–]Felinomancy 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Unless of course if you're in the Navy, in which case Admiralty law does apply to you.

    (probably)

    [–]King_Posner 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    there was once a soverign in actual maritime court arguing it was actually an admiralty law court instead and didn't apply. he was actually literally on the stream of commerce as a river fisherman in a coastal state but argued against the UCC as well (not that it mattered in the case). or so a professor once told me.

    [–]ENG-eins -2ポイント-1ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Context? I don't get the reference.

    [–]aaanderson89 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Hey, I know you! You're the "Can I wear a cross to an interview and sue for religious descrimination when I don't get hired" guy!

    [–]dothemath 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Sovereign citizen "admiralty get out of jail free card" bs.

    [–]gsfgf 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Google sovereign citizens. It's like the worst shitposts on here but the people are serious. It's hilarious.

    [–]Malort_without_irony 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Be glad that you don't; it's part of the more random sovereign citizen malarkey.

    [–]machine667 11ポイント12ポイント  (3子コメント)

    27.1. you're not driving your car you're travelling. driving is for business and you're not doing business so you're not driving and don't need a driver's license.

    [–]ENG-eins -3ポイント-2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Sources or is this trolling?

    [–]alexa-488 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It might be referencing the many people driving without licenses, including one recently that was pretty much "what can I do to prevent this cop from targeting my mom when she drives because he knows she doesn't have a license?"

    [–]ivantheteriblespeler 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

    The people who fall for those things must be the same ones who make clickbait ads profitable. You wonder who could possibly fall for those things, until you look around at just how gullible some people can be.

    This one weird trick keeps you out of legal trouble every time. Police hate it!

    [–]Neveronlyadream 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I think it's less gullibility and more failure to learn your damn lesson. The same people who fall for those things fall for them over and over, and then complain about it when they're misled or scammed.

    [–]P-01S 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Actually, as I learned in /r/legaladvice, sometimes legal documents do need to have parts written in ALL CAPS to be legally valid.

    [–]CeruleanTresses 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    if forced to go to court, loudly ask the judge about how "you never consented to the laws that you are charging me with". Drop the mic and yes, again, walk away like a boss.

    Or take the Hank Rearden approach. Spend an hour explaining to the judge that you refuse to defend yourself, because that would lend legitimacy to the proceedings and you don't acknowledge the court's authority. They'll panic and let you go while the crowd applauds wildly. I'm pretty sure this would get you out of most traffic tickets.

    [–]PLeb5 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    1. all legal documents are not valid unless if spells your name in CAPITAL LETTERS.

    Is that a Santos Bonacci reference? Cause that dude is hilariously crazy.

    [–]Kanthes 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

    15 - If you have a neighbor who has done something crazy or has threatened to do something crazy, get a security camera for your property. For that matter, get a dashcam as well.

    Fixed that for you. So many cases solved by magical camera evidence. <3

    [–]aceshighsays 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    yess and post your videos to reddit.

    [–]Sorthum 10ポイント11ポイント  (5子コメント)

    You can almost never sue a dog.

    [–]jennybean42[S] 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

    And since I have you tagged as "dog lawyer" I know that's true!

    [–]chaosakita 5ポイント6ポイント  (8子コメント)

    Full grown trees are worth more money that you imagine and you shouldn’t cut them down unless you absolutely have to.

    Could anyone explain this to me? And how much are they really worth?

    [–]jennybean42[S] 6ポイント7ポイント  (6子コメント)

    It depends, but a mature tree on a property can be worth between $10-20K . So when there are disputes at property lines about trees and someone suggest to "just cut it down" it usually isn't that simple. Your property value can really take a hit.

    [–]Smartare 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    $10-20K

    wow. thats alot

    [–]HideAndSheik 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Sorry, I'm still not understanding...do you mean it's a bad idea to cut it down in case it belong to your neighbor, and therefore you could be liable for decreasing their property value? I ask because I recently bought a house on 1.5 acres of land, but at least .75 acres of it is covered in dense trees and brush that makes that part of our property unusable. We were planning on cutting most of them down over time, but I don't want to do something I regret...especially since the property lines aren't that clear with our neighbors.

    [–]zifnab06 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I'm assuming they mean "You live in a suburb, you have a tree in your yard, it makes your property worth more"

    Get someone to verify your property lines, and don't cut anything down outside of them.

    [–]P-01S 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Not exactly. If you cut down a neighbor's tree, you owe them damages equal to the cost of replacing the tree. That means potentially replacing a 50 year old oak with a 50 year old oak: Not a sapling. The tree is actually part of their property.

    So yeah... You can see how that is expensive.

    [–]P-01S 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Not as legal policy but as useful life advice: talk to your neighbor about it. They might agree with you about removing the brush. They might get pissed if you cut it down and create lines of sight between your property and theirs. It's good to know beforehand.

    Also, if you plan on building so much as a shed, get a survey done to make sure there are markers on the property line.

    [–]HideAndSheik 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Thank you, that sounds like really good advice...I didn't even think about creating lines of sight. The brush definitely gives their backyard and our backyard some privacy and it's certainly something to consider. They seem like really friendly neighbors so far so it wouldn't hurt to at least ask!

    [–]P-01S 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Sure! That is not the value of the tree per se. It is the value of replacing the tree with an equivalent tree. A pine tree sapping might be cheap, but replacing a 50 year old pine with another of roughly the same age and size is going to cost tens of thousands of dollars.

    If you cut down someone's tree illegally, you owe them the cost of replacing the tree with an equivalent tree—not just the same species of tree. So yeah... Expect to pay tens of thousands of dollars so your neighbor can have a mature tree transplanted in their yard.

    In summary: don't fuck with other people's trees.

    [–]qlube 13ポイント14ポイント  (21子コメント)

    A few of these are not quite correct.

    In the United States, you can basically be fired for anything at any time (unless you live in Montana or signed a contract.) Even if you are a member of a protected class, discrimination has to be really fucking egregious for you to have any case.

    Doesn't have to be that egregious to file a suit and hope to get a settlement.

    If you are making a serious and major decision in your life (buying property, writing a will, getting a divorce, filing for custody, immigration etc.) get a lawyer in RL. No matter how clever you are, no amount of reading reddit, googling, or otherwise soliciting opinions on the internet is going to get you the best result. If you are poor, find a local legal clinic.

    You don't need a lawyer to buy property if it's just a relatively simple transaction like a home purchase. For certain immigration issues, getting a lawyer is probably a bit overkill.

    Also, there's lots of major decisions that don't require hiring a lawyer. Getting married, having a child, going to college, switching jobs, moving to a different country, etc.

    If someone says “I’m gonna sue you!” they are more than likely talking out their ass. People who are actually going to sue you don’t bother with the threatening first.

    If it's literally someone saying, "I'm gonna sue you!" then yeah, you're probably right, but there are plenty of situations where the norm is to notify well in advance that you're planning to sue the person unless they remedy the situation. Patent litigation for example (so as to begin the period of time the person has notice of the patents).

    That pop-up while you were watching porn was a scam or a virus. Seriously.

    Not legal advice, but porn pop-ups are often links to other porn sites, which aren't necessarily scams. Actually, I'd say pop-ups to illegal streaming sites are often much more likely to be nefarious than porn pop-ups. They frequently ask you to install plug-ins which probably are adware or spyware.

    The police are not your friends. If they “just want you to come explain things to them at the station” or "just talk to you for a minute" do NOT do it. No matter how innocent you are, it won’t go well. Refuse to answer any questions without a lawyer. Seriously, I know you think you have nothing to hide but--trust me--better safe than sorry on this one.

    I think this is generally good advice, but in my opinion, /legaladvice tends to go a little overboard with it. For example, if you're a witness to a crime, and the police want to ask you what you saw to put in a police report, you don't always have to refuse until you speak to an attorney.

    Avoid living places with HOAs and easements whenever possible.

    This one I would probably say is outright bad advice. Easements and HOAs are fairly typical. I wouldn't say either of them should be inherently a deal-breaker when buying a house. It of course depends on what you're willing to live with.

    [–]alexa-488 8ポイント9ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Avoid living places with HOAs and easements whenever possible.

    This one I would probably say is outright bad advice. Easements and HOAs are fairly typical. I wouldn't say either of them should be inherently a deal-breaker when buying a house. It of course depends on what you're willing to live with.

    I grew up in a neighborhood under a HOA and it was literally hell with all the old busy bodies and their BS. But I'm looking at buying condos that have HOAs and in those cases it makes perfect sense to have a HOA when there's so many shared walls, ceilings, floors, etc. involved. Put in an offer on a place and the CC&Rs were almost identical to large sections of my apartment lease and seemed completely reasonable for what basically is an apartment complex.

    [–]Mdcastle 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

    If you don't mind being told what color to paint your house or how long your grass can be, a HOA can put a stop to your neighbor fixing junk cars in his lawn and maintain neighborhood swimming pools and tennis courts.

    [–]alexa-488 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

    We had more issues with the HOA president flipping out over kids in the neighborhood using chalk on driveways (privately owned) and who was and was not allowed to park RVs on the road than house colors or property upkeep. As we were leaving there was also a big fiasco about a "fence" that was mostly motivated by the golfers in the HOA being upset about their shortcut being blocked off by new land owners.

    [–]Malort_without_irony 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    The uniform rule with HOAs is that you have to be willing to get involved and stay involved. 9 out of 10 problems that I see aren't somehow core to the HOA itself, but because the loons are the ones driving the bus and no one else knows their rights.

    [–]alexa-488 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yeah and that works if the loons are a small faction, but if the HOA is split in half between loons and non-loons who actually do know the CC&Rs and their rights, then there's drama. And when the loony side loses a battle and decides to go outside the HOA to try and get their way and/or punish a house, then things get really awful.

    Like one time the HOA president flipped his shit about chalk marks on our driveway and tried to have it classed as "vandalism" but the HOA as a whole rejected that shit. So then he tried to get the police involved. And when that didn't work he'd try bullying me and my sister (10-13 at the time) to get us to feel guilty for the "vandalism" in the neighborhood.

    And then there was the whole "fence" drama.

    [–]evaned 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

    If you don't mind being told what color to paint your house or how long your grass can be

    Or whether you can fly a flag, or park in your driveway, or park in front of your house, or a bajillion other things.

    I'd guess I'd pay 20-30% less for a house in an HOA that had the power, or could "unilaterally" get the power, to regulate my house and it's use (as opposed to one that can just maintain common areas, if there is such a thing) if there was a reasonable choice not in one.

    [–]gsfgf 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    My parents' neighborhood has a weak HOA that operates the pool and park. You can build whatever you want on your property though. I don't know if it could increase its power, but that's how things have stood my entire life, so I think it's probably expressly limited in the covenant.

    [–]Malort_without_irony 5ポイント6ポイント  (4子コメント)

    You don't need a lawyer to buy property if it's just a relatively simple transaction like a home purchase.

    "It's just a simple home purchase" is just like "oh, it's a simple bit of programming." It's entirely possible that it is, but, as a rule, you are not the one who's got the skills to make that judgment.

    And while a lot of decisions don't require hiring a lawyer, a lot of them get a lot better off if you loop in a lawyer, just for having that person who's paid to tell you that you're wrong.

    [–]rebthor 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Seeing all the issues that have been posted to legaladvice about "simple home purchases" which could have been easily avoided or mitigated with a lawyer makes me glad to be in a state that basically requires a lawyer for any real estate transaction. Your real estate agent doesn't really care about your interests, just like the car salesman doesn't; they just want to close the deal and move on to the next deal so they can get paid. Your lawyer on the other hand is getting paid whether you close or not.

    [–]evaned 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Seeing all the issues that have been posted to legaladvice about "simple home purchases" which could have been easily avoided or mitigated with a lawyer

    Any references? What kinds of things can go wrong like that where a lawyer would help?

    [–]jennybean42[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Closing paperwork, tax abatements, title issues, easements, mortgage paperwork....

    For people who are knowledgeable about real estate maybe these things aren't big deals, but having someone on my side who I was sure worked for me (unlike the real estate agents) was a great help.

    [–]rebthor 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I was at a closing for my first home where the seller wasn't going to compensate me for some things that they really, really should be compensating for. Things like not paying for gas, electric, water for the week after closing that they were going to be in the house. There was also a problem with Citibank wiring the money in and we had to close in escrow. I can't say what would have happened had I not had an attorney but I can bet that when you're at the closing and these kinds of things come up that a real estate agent is not looking out for your best interests unless they align with his or hers.

    [–]mizmoose 11ポイント12ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Even if you are a member of a protected class, discrimination has to be really fucking egregious for you to have any case.

    Doesn't have to be that egregious to file a suit and hope to get a settlement.

    It really depends. I was fired twice for being disabled - both times I was told this behind a closed door with nobody else around, and then officially fired for another reason that came out of the blue. Both times, employment lawyers told me "too bad, so sad, you have no case."

    [–]RazzBeryllium 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    That pop-up while you were watching porn was a scam or a virus. Seriously.

    Not legal advice, but porn pop-ups are often links to other porn sites, which aren't necessarily scams. Actually, I'd say pop-ups to illegal streaming sites are often much more likely to be nefarious than porn pop-ups. They frequently ask you to install plug-ins which probably are adware or spyware.

    I think she's referring to a more specific situation that gets posted to /r/legaladvice about twice a week (at least).

    You're watching porn and a quasi-official popup window appears saying you've been caught accessing child pornography and will be contacted by <insert government agency>. To mitigate/protest this you must visit <insert website>, where I'm assuming they trick you into revealing personal info/paying money.

    [–]sbboard 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You don't need a lawyer to buy property if it's just a relatively simple transaction like a home purchase. For certain immigration issues, getting a lawyer is probably a bit overkill.

    Yeah immigration is relatively simple in a lot of cases. Immigration lawyers are pretty expensive, and there are step-by-step guides on things like the K1 visa all over the Internet.

    [–]Anonymoose15 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Not legal advice, but porn pop-ups are often links to other porn sites, which aren't necessarily scams. Actually, I'd say pop-ups to illegal streaming sites are often much more likely to be nefarious than porn pop-ups. They frequently ask you to install plug-ins which probably are adware or spyware.

    Pop-ups meaning the ones that specifically say something like "You are looking up illegal content, the FBI has been notified and your computer is being scanned" or "If you don't send us money we will report you to the FBI " type pop-ups. Something to note though it that encryption lock viruses DO exist (they encrypt your hardrive and extort you to sedning money to someone to unencrypt)

    [–]mizmoose 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Number whatever-the-last-is-now+1: Look into getting full (collision/comprehensive) coverage on your car. It may not be as expensive as you think, and if someone plows into you it may save your butt.

    I live in MI (state of O So High Insurance) and drive an almost-20-year-old car. It costs a total of another $200/year to get full coverage, and for that much it's worth the piece of mind to not have to deal with legal shenanigans if some asshole plows into me and decides to sue me.

    [–]Smgth 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Yeah, but what about renter's insurance?

    [–]jennybean42[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Dammit! I knew I forgot something!

    [–]newprofile15 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    1. Don't take legal advice from strangers on the internet.

    That should really be in the sidebar. Other than that not a bad list.

    [–]Swardington 3ポイント4ポイント  (5子コメント)

    That's how you ruin your credit or kill your dog.

    Mannnnnnnn, every time I'm reminded of the dog story I get a little depressed.

    [–]jennybean42[S] 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I'm still hoping it was a troll, actually.

    [–]Swardington 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I can't decide if I'd rather be depressed because the story is true, or angry that a troll toyed with my emotions.

    [–]ENG-eins -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Elaborate on the dog story.

    [–]RazzBeryllium 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Guy has a crazy neighbor. Neighbor goes to court saying that OP's dog really belongs to neighbor and that the OP stole it. OP is notified of this. OP ignores it thinking that it's too crazy to be real and/or his neighbor is just messing with him.

    As a result, neighbor is awarded the dog in a default judgment. OP then receives a court order instructing him to hand his dog over to the crazy neighbor. https://np.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/3g0aub/can_this_be_real_my_neighbor_has_a_court_order_to/

    There were 2 updates after that:

    1 - His vet called him to ask why some guy was there trying to euthanize the dog. When the OP explained, the vet took the dog but refused to euthanize it. Crazy neighbor went ballistic. OP's final comment was to say he was leaving to go get the dog and hide it somewhere safe until his attorney could file something.

    2 - Before he could get his dog, the neighbor called the sheriff and forced the vet to give up the dog. Neighbor then took the dog to a different vet. The next day, OP opened the door to find his dog's collar and some papers verifying that the dog was euthanized. https://np.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/3gra25/update_2_my_neighbor_stole_my_dog/cu0pin0

    [–]Smartare 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    :( I remember that guy. :(

    [–]asoiahats 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    23 - always check for onions.

    [–]aceshighsays 1ポイント2ポイント  (7子コメント)

    Why do you need renters insurance so bad you mention it 3 times?

    [–]mizmoose 0ポイント1ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Well, you don't if you aren't renting. But if you are, it covers a multitude of things, and not just "my place was broken into." It can cover things like "The water heater blew up and destroyed everything" to "My neighbor got drunk and peed on my door, and now my landlord says I have to pay to replace it." And other fun delights.

    tl;dr: Just like most other insurance, it's there to save your bacon.

    mmmmmmm baaaaconnnn

    [–]sooneday 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

    If I made a little more money I don't think I would need it because I could self insure. All my objects are worth 5k at most to replace. I mean my palace could burn down and I'd be fine.

    [–]evaned 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

    You get renter's insurance as much for its liability protection as replacement cost protection. Could you self-insure for tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars?

    [–]sooneday 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

    What are some things liability protection covers?

    [–]evaned 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Some things it may cover:

    And one I thought of:

    • You are responsible for maintaining the sidewalk, do not, and someone sues you after slipping and falling on ice

    I'm not totally sure how much of the water damage stuff will be covered by a typical policy, but presumably some do.

    While getting those links, I was reminded that renter's insurance will often provide compensation for moving and temporary living expenses if, e.g., someone else floods or burns down your building.

    [–]mizmoose 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Your place could burn down and it could be your fault, even through negligence (ex: overloading an outlet, falling asleep smoking, etc.), and then you'd be on the hook for paying to repair the place.

    It's not just your stuff that you're insuring. You're insuring your apartment.

    [–]NoesHowe2Spel 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Likewise, if someone’s mother is asking you for money so they don’t report pictures of your junk that you sent to their “underage daughter” to the police is probably also a scam.

    This is a modern version of a very old con game (with roots in the early 19th Century) called "The Badger Game" Wiki.

    [–]zifnab06 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    I miss Montana.

    For anyone who cares: http://leg.mt.gov/bills/mca/39/2/39-2-904.htm

    More or less, after you've finished your probation its very difficult to get rid of you without cause. Employers without valid cause must make up lost wages up until the point you find new employment or 4 years, whichever comes first...

    [–]gsfgf 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Can an employer just require a 20 year probationary period?

    [–]zifnab06 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I'm honestly not sure. I would assume that would end up in court if you were ever fired, and you'd end up winning. I have no idea where to look up previous cases (or even what to search for) to find out.

    [–]CakeisaDie 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    3x. If your employer has not paid you for a month. File for unemployment. Do not pass go, do not wait. file for unemployment and find a new job.

    3xx. If your employer fired you for any reason other than (Gender, Race, Age, So forth) and you aren't in a union or your contract doesn't say otherwise go get unemployment.

    3xxx. If you haven't gotten your final wages, report to the state government (Google Wage Claim + State)

    [–]taterbizkit 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Re: 17

    In most of the US, it's impossible to entirely avoid easements (city, power company, cable company, phone company, etc).

    What you want to avoid are the ones that give neighbors rights to your property

    [–]OneRedSent 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Regarding item 1, union employees generally have a lot more protection. Not all employment is at-will. Otherwise, great list. :)

    [–]Ramady 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Also, non-union employees still have protections for things like protected concerted activities. It's the thing I find myself correcting more than anything else.

    [–]wouldthewolves 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

    you know, I think r/legaladvice has been a real learning experience for me. if only because I'm from a country where usually people rent places through an agency, so I had never heard of anyone having landlord problems. I've never met the dude that rented my apartment for two years.

    as for the r/badlegaladvice, law school is filled with it. so it's also very amusing because I'm getting good arguments to call my classmates idiots.

    [–]Rocktone 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    It's nice that bad legal advice crosses international boundaries.

    [–]wouldthewolves 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

    it does! people in law school think they can sue over anything. even grades. given to them by people whose other job is federal judge. they think they know more about law that them.

    [–]seanchaigirl 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Heh, a guy in my first year torts class argued Palsgraf for over fifteen minutes with the professor, who was a sitting appellate court judge. His basic argument was, "well, it has to be someone's fault!"

    [–]i_pewpewpew_you 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Honestly, so true. I rent from a private landlord after securing the flat through an agency here in the UK. He just couldn't be bothered to look for tennants himself, but once I moved in I just deal with him.

    He's a nice guy, he gets stuff sorted quickly when I need it done, he leaves me alone and gives me a minimum of 24hrs notice (usually more) if he needs access, I pay my rent on time each month and look after the place. Turns out, I'm apparently the luckiest renter on earth.

    [–]Guvnah-Wyze 3ポイント4ポイント  (7子コメント)

    I take issue with #17

    /u/Zapopa sounds like a swell guy to have in your back pocket.

    [–]Zapopa 9ポイント10ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Hey thanks pal. Because you have been nice I will reserve a spot for you in my bunker when the zombie apocalypse happens or another super bowl party, whichever happens first. It's fully equipped for up to 20 people. And has more guns and makers mark than we can ever use. When it happens head west of Chicago and listen to CB Channel 11. And bring extra women! :)

    [–]mizmoose 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Zapopa is starting to get The Stand and The Walking Dead mixed up.

    All the good zombies go to Boulder!

    [–]Zapopa 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Naw. The good ones stop at my bunker, the bad ones go to LV!

    [–]mizmoose 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I guess The Walkin' Dude is the ultimate in Undead, isn't he?

    [–]Zapopa 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    He is indeed. In his rundown heels.

    [–]P-01S -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

    If I bring Scotch and a few hundred rounds of match grade .22LR, can I join in?

    [–]Ramady 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You don't want to be around /u/zapopa and scotch.

    [–]MacArthurParker 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Any specific links for context for numbers 5, 12, and 16?

    [–]jennybean42[S] 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

    5-- The sub gets that question about every two weeks.

    12-- A lot of times when people are asking about getting their deposit back, a common question is "are there any pictures?"

    16-- Any time trees come up it is mentioned.

    [–]Matthew_Cline 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Also that "am I being detained?" shit doesn't usually work.

    I thought the point of that was to prevent cops from being able to claim that they were asking you questions after they'd let you go, and thus any of your answers were voluntary and not covered by Miranda rights.

    [–]mizmoose 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Miranda

    That's what's missing! "You can be arrested and not read your Miranda rights. You can be detained and not read your Miranda rights. Miranda rights only come in to play when they want to start questioning/"interviewing" you. This is another reason why you get a lawyer and SHUT UP."

    Also missing: When in doubt, IT IS AMY'S FAULT.

    [–]Anonymoose15 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    romeo and Juliet laws need to be severely expanded

    [–]LesterBriePearson 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    23. Meads v. Meads is a wonderful thing and you should read it.

    [–]evaned 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I have one inspired by this thread and others:

    ## - use the memo line on your checks.

    [–]TacoDinosaurPower 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    1. LMAO. The dog part.

    [–]jfpbookworm 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    If you think you've discovered a loophole in a well-known area of law (e.g., tax law, copyright law, bird law): you probably haven't.

    [–]ttumblrbots -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    SnapShots: 1, 2, 3 [huh?]

    doooooogs: 1, 2 (seizure warning); 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; if i miss a post please PM me

    [–]Smartare -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

    If you are over 18, don’t fuck/sext/etc anyone under 18

    Unless you live outside the US (like most people in the world do). Most countries in the west don't have 18 as an age limit.

    [–]gsfgf 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

    It's 16 in most of the US too. Though a lot of states still need to update their sexting laws so that teenagers sexting each other no longer falls under child pornography.

    [–]Smartare 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yea, its silly that a 17 year old who sends a sext message to another 17 year old should be charge with CP. Its like getting charged with attempted murder if you fail a suicide.