Bitcoin Magazine

Show Menu
bitcoin-atm

Andreas Antonopoulos Thinks Bitcoin ATMs Need to Be Completely Redesigned

Mastering Bitcoin Author Andreas Antonopoulos recently gave at talk at Harvard’s i-lab, spending much of his time in front of a small audience describing the various issues with Bitcoin as a brand. He noted many problems with the terminology used in Bitcoin, and he also focused on specific products or services in the Bitcoin space that seem to be doing a disservice to potential users.

At one point during the presentation, Antonopoulos turned his attention to Bitcoin ATMs, asking the audience how many of them had used one of the machines in the past. While a few people raised their hands, those hands went down when Antonopoulos then asked how many of them enjoyed their experience with the Bitcoin ATM.

How Traditional ATMs Work

To explain the user experience issues with Bitcoin ATMs, Antonopoulos first talked about the setup of traditional bank ATMs:

“When you interact as a person with an ATM, 1. you have a pre-existing relationship with the bank or financial institution; 2. you have a pre-existing balance; 3. your primary objective is to get in, get cash, [and] get out. Twenty seconds is too long. Three clicks is too long.”

In other words, there is no need for long explanations or user-onboarding with traditional ATMs. Everyone who uses them already has a debit card, and they’ve already interacted with the corresponding bank in the past. The process can be simple because the user already has his or her bank account setup.

Bitcoin ATMs Have Nothing in Common with Traditional ATMs

According to Antonopoulos, many Bitcoin ATM developers have been looking too closely at how traditional bank ATMs work when designing their own machines. He noted that Bitcoin ATMs have “absolutely nothing” in common with the ATMs that are currently used by banks, and he went on to describe the experience an average person has when attempting to use a Bitcoin ATM for the first time:

“The average user of Bitcoin ATM is someone who has never seen bitcoin before. It is a person who doesn’t understand what bitcoin is, and the ATM is their first introduction to this currency. It is a person who does not have a pre-existing relationship with anyone in the Bitcoin space. It is a person who does not currently have a wallet because they didn’t know they needed one – because they don’t know what a wallet is (it’s a keychain). And so they walk up to this machine, and this machine has been designed by engineers to simulate the experience of an ATM, even though the experience shares absolutely nothing with the use case we’re putting it to. So you walk up and the ATM tries to give you bitcoin in as few clicks as possible with a minimum amount of interaction. Is that a way to build brand loyalty? Is that a way to build user experience? Is that a way to introduce new users? I mean, it just throws it at you, and you’re not ready for that. But, ‘Please open your phone and display your QR code.’ Like, what? What’s a QR code?”

In an effort to solidify the point that Bitcoin ATMs should not be operating in the same manner as traditional bank ATMs, Antonopoulos then went through a long list of questions that a user would likely have while attempting to use a Bitcoin ATM for the first time.

The Right Model for a Bitcoin ATM

After describing the problems with currently available Bitcoin ATMs, Antonopoulos explained how he would design such a device:

“If I was designing a Bitcoin ATM, first of all, I’d put it in bodegas. Secondly, it wouldn’t have a lick of English on it. It’d be all-Spanish because I’m going to really push the remittance model. Thirdly, the first function on the ATM would be ‘Send money to Mexico City.’ That’s it. Because I want people to use the bitcoin for something. [Fourthly], I’d have a big button on the front that says ‘Talk to a human.’ I’ve got an Internet-connected device with a forward-facing camera and a tablet screen, and I’m not using it to do video customer service? Are you kidding me?”

It’s clear that the device Andreas Antonopoulos is imagining is completely different from a traditional ATM. In addition to the focus on international remittances, Antonopoulos also expanded on the idea that the Bitcoin device needs to teach the user about the peer-to-peer digital cash system:

“I don’t want to interact for fifteen seconds. I want to interact for two hours . . . And it tells me where I can spend [bitcoin]. It gives me suggestions on wallets, and it can send them directly to my phone. It’s building loyalty, brand and experience. That’s not a 15-second interaction.”

This is a perfect example of how sometimes simply applying the old ways of doing things to Bitcoin will not work. The most impactful innovations in the Bitcoin space have been the ones that created something completely new rather than thinking about how things worked in the past. Developers and entrepreneurs should try to avoid simply replacing the carriage with an automobile. It’s time to get rid of the horse.

 

Photo BTC Keychain / Flickr (CC)

Get Top Stories Weekly

We respect your email privacy

  • c4p0ne

    Users should have a choice whether they want the “15 second experience” or the “2 hour experience.” I choose 15 seconds with 0% fees and 0% draconian-Orwellian KYC/AML.

  • http://www.daboloskov.com/ Alex

    At La Maison du Bitcoin there’s always someone to explain how to buy bitcoin with the ATM. But he’s kinda right. Hows about building a network with Home Agent Homeworking at the end of the line!?

  • http://JonnyTravels.com/ JonnyTravels

    Andreas has lost me on this one. The “A” in ATM means “automatic” and nobody in their right mind is gonna go to a bodega and stand in front of some kiosk while they receive a 2 hour crash course on Bitcoin. That’s what google and your home desktop are for. Also, who’s gonna pay for that human being on the other end of that tablet conversation? ATM fees? Have fun paying a 20% premium so you can have a human explain how Bitcoin has almost no fees only to get hit with a massive fee for human services. Human labor costs WAY more money than robot labor. That’s why ATMs exist in the first place. They are a massive force multiplier. 

    Also, The reason people are designing terminals like existing ATMs is because that’s what people are already familiar with. It’s what they are comfortable with. It’s what they already know. If you don’t know what a QR code is then Bitcoin is not for you. You should probably stay at home and write snail mail to your other old friends and family. Bitcoin is for those who are looking to push forward with what is new and innovative. The idea behind ATMs is to REDUCE THE FRICTION to Bitcoin acquisition. His ideas are the opposite of that very ideal. 

    I think Andreas is a smart guy but his views on this are pure nonsense. Lamassu and Skyhook terminals are as good and frictionless as it gets. 

    • J GT

      Yes, I run a few genesis coin BTC ATMs. Most people have wallets and no exactly what they are doing. I think you are right for the most part. Other than Lamassu and Skyhook terminals working well. I tried them in the beggining They are junk and can’t really function on a business level.

      • http://JonnyTravels.com/ JonnyTravels

        The Skyhook is just a glorified toy and absolutely not scalable at all for business so I agree but the Lamassu is awesome. I think the interface is the best for cash to BTC. But I think that’s its just better for the consumer end and not the business end.

        BitAccess and Genesis coins are god for two-way transactions, and from the business perspective, you’re totally right because they make it easier to comply with KNC/AML laws but for the consumer there is more friction with those machines than with a Skyhook or Lamassu.

        Glad to hear you are helping to get more BTC into the hands of more people. Keep it up!

        Just out of curiosity, Will companies like Brinks, service your Genesis coins terminals or do you have to do that yourself/ have an employee do it?

    • inpips

      Andreas was basically describing a remote remittance kiosk, with this model it would be possible for one “teller” to man multiple locations, obviously as users become more familiar with the ATM the less interaction they would need.

  • Elwar

    The video part makes sense for a help line. Most of these ATMs have a person designated to stand there and answer peoples’ questions. That’s a lot of time wasted that could be done over video.
    Different language options is a given. Most actual Bitcoin users don’t go to Bitcoin ATMs though since the fees are usually around 10%. Low traffic plus cost of the BTM plus the time to change out the money requires high fees.
    Then the whole KYC/AML stuff just makes it so much easier to just go to localbitcoins. THAT’s where you can either have your 2 hour session (if the person isn’t busy) or 15 second transaction (shake hands, get the money, click on the “release bitcoins” button, confirm, transaction processed in 3 seconds).

  • TheOneLaw

    Guys and gals, get a grip:
    Bitcoin ATMs are cool, but the real killer app is litecoin,
    let bitcoin be the investment and litecoin be the currency.

    • hughht5

      Please explain? I don’t see any reasoning behind this?

  • acharn

    best place to site bitcoin ATM’s would be airports, and other transport terminals where people have time on their hands. Airports are ideal for this.. change your local cash into btc before heading home.

    • inpips

      I like that, chuck in all your notes and or change and get a printout of your btc keys.

  • Thomistic Cajetan

    Andreas does make a good point, I think every single ATM should have a offline airgapped printer right next to it. In order to make a fresh wallet address that is not connected to the internet. I had this problem once, whereby I did not set up my QR code before hand, took me quite a bit with a shoddy internet connection. An ATM should always have a wallet generator with multi sig available on the spot. That is a small price to pay given the sort of premiums you pay for the ATM’s.

    His point is that he wants to reach new audiences, who might need all the hand holding. And they don’t have someone else to teach them about it, or someone they know. All you should need is click once, print wallet. Put QR code generator, done. Also have some printed literature, or the possibility of receiving an email with more information. if the user wishes to do so, the option should be there. To get out of there in 15 seconds, if you want to, or get information + plus help if they want for a small premium. Since for the most part someone goes to the ATM not to put all their wealth into it, but rather as a way of getting some quick coin and out of curiosity too. We are getting there slowly but surely. At the very least we have options now, its no longer impossible to get your hands on BTC now as it used to be. At this point, BTC users, are willing to put up with anything. However, mass adoption is where all the hand holding needs to be done.

    Edit: added a few things and corrected something.

  • http://daviddire.com/ David Dire

    I’d hate to be the one waiting behind whoever’s using a Bitcoin ATM for 2 hours! I can barely control myself when it hits the four minute mark. All I need from a Bitcoin ATM is for it to send me Bitcoin when I put cash in, that’s all. Although he does have a very good point about it being a different technology to ATM’s/banks.