全 19 件のコメント

[–]GrovyOne 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Why are they comparing a nuclear blast to a gasoline one? What was the "target" of this explosion? The article seems scant on details.

[–]GelPeNNieS 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Would anyone outside a government agency know the target without throwing guesses out everywhere?

[–]GrovyOne -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Anyone who lives in the area.

[–]5triangles1pentagon 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Jesus. No matter how idiotic the theory is, this place will humor it.

[–]DaneelR 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, if this turns out to be true, we're heading for a nuclear holocaust after all. I just hope it comes a few months AFTER the release of Fallout 4.

[–]KeyserSaySo 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

they left out the part about the reason all the people who say it couldnt be a nuke are wrong is because it wasnt a normal nuke as our science understands it - it was a nuke from mars, theyre fed up with all the junk we keep sending their way

or maybe it was from pluto, folks there arent happy that we said theyre not a real planet

[–]mralstoner 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Tianjin was an inside job. The stock market crash shattered confidence in Xi and the Communist Party, who responded in the only way they know: a massive distraction campaign.

[–]youfuckingslaves -1ポイント0ポイント  (7子コメント)

Except nuclear bombs are fantasy it is merely tnt albeit tons of it, Geiger counters will pick up radioactive levels after a tnt Blast.

[–]Kabukikitsune 5ポイント6ポイント  (6子コメント)

Even a tactical nuke in the 1 kiloton range, while it could produce the same devastation, would leave radiation behind. So yes, no nuke here.

[–]GelPeNNieS -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

Tell me why you think what you said discredits a nuclear explosion.

[–]Kabukikitsune 7ポイント8ポイント  (4子コメント)

First and foremost, EMP. The EMP blast from a nuclear explosion would have prevented any video of the blast being recorded. While a 1 kiloton blast wouldn't have leveled the area flat like Hiroshima or Nagasaki, the EMP from it would have traveled upward of 20 miles away from the blast. Knocking any and all cameras out LONG before the actual light of the blast would have been seen.

Second reason: There were debris and containers around the crater. Again, if we're talking nuclear, the flimsy (relatively speaking) materials that containers are made of would have meant they would have been vaporized by the detonation. Yet within only 20 feet or so of the crater, you have over turned trucks and trailers.

Third: No reports of mass blindness. The light from an atomic bomb is VERY bright. Enough that if you look at the explosion without protective visors, you will go blind. It burns your retinas out in an instant. Yet there are reports of people in the nearby buildings who saw a fire, followed by a blast. Those people are still able to see, thus their eyes weren't burned out.

Do you want me to continue?

[–]TheSpiceMustAirflow 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

TIL EMPs travel faster than the speed of light.

Seriously though, we have no reason to believe tianjin was a nuke (and the article talks about nukes in 9/11, lol)

[–]GelPeNNieS -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

All this is dependent on "yield". Why didn't you read the article?

Edit: This is for your EMP you like so much.http://www.askamathematician.com/2011/11/q-why-do-a-nuclear-weapons-cause-emps-electromagnetic-pulses/