4030
4031

Hypocrisy at its finest. (imgur.com)

piss_sprinkled_tits が 投稿

上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 255
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]kaalaaaa 608ポイント609ポイント  (57子コメント)

It's not even hypocrisy, gawker's bussiness model is manufactured outrage.

[–]sleepy55 75ポイント76ポイント  (15子コメント)

God help you if you get your news from any site in the Gawker network. I think at that point even /r/news would be an upgrade.

You're right though, they know rage sells so they try to make you mad to get clicks.

[–]PowerStarterYour now breeding manualy 29ポイント30ポイント  (6子コメント)

But Jalopnik is a nice place...

[–]brolix 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Diamond in the very very very very VERY rough.

[–]FluxComplex 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

and io9!

[–]shift4338 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah thats the only site in the gawker network I regularly visit.

[–]ArcticKid 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Jalopnik is amazing. Best/funniest group of writers out there. Io9 is alright too content wise, but i dont care for the editors. I really wish Jalopnik wasnt apart of Gawker.

[–]ILikeSugarCookies 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

was apart* or wasn't a part*

[–]ILikeSugarCookies 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't mind Deadspin either. They tend to call out sports bullshit without fear of backlash.

[–]Iamessar 0ポイント1ポイント  (6子コメント)

Wait what's so wrong with r/news?

[–]DrobUWP 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

(Like many subs) it's an echo chamber of people shouting one side of issues. comments and posts breaking the Circlejerk are quickly relegated to downvoted obscurity. showing holes in the narrative through presenting alternate sources is not welcome.

90% of stories is a repeat of some variation of:

  • anti cop. there are no good ones. every police officer should be put down.

or

  • anti large company. profits are evil.

[–]palsc5 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

What? You think anti-cop and anti-business stories make up 90%?

Together they make about 50%ish. Bernie Sanders is a god posts make up the rest.

[–]Cpr196 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's usually anti-cop, unless it's a big news story about a cop and race, then things get really racist.

[–]lecherous_hump 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

The mods delete stories arbitrarily, for one. I didn't know about the Ashley Madison hack for 16 hours after the story broke because the mods were deleting stories about it. I was pretty pissed, because that was juicy and Reddit is where I get my news. I think I finally found out about it from an Advice Animal.

[–]Iamessar 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

LOL finding news from advice animals memes. Why would they want to conceal news about such a hack though?

[–]lecherous_hump 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have no idea, but they did. It wasn't until later in the day, like I said 16 hours after the story originally broke, that they started letting posts through.

[–]blindcolumn -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Gizmodo is actually pretty good for gadget-related stuff.

[–]awFirestarter 92ポイント93ポイント  (35子コメント)

Why Gawker is so Awful

[–]snoharm 45ポイント46ポイント  (22子コメント)

I was super interested, but I don't have 40 minutes to watch moral outrage in the middle of the day. Anyone got a more concise video?

Edit: or an article, it might go faster if I don't just have someone read for me

[–]HealingCare 24ポイント25ポイント  (7子コメント)

Just remember these 2 words:

FUCK KOTAKU

[–]the_recluse 7ポイント8ポイント  (6子コメント)

what does kotaku do? i've read articles there every now and then that seemed decent, but i dunno enough about them

[–]iamtheyeti311 8ポイント9ポイント  (5子コメント)

Pretty much the whole reason for the gamergate backlash. /r/kotakuinaction

[–]TheWatersOfMars 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

I bet this comment section's gonna be filled with thoughtful, insightful commentary on feminism and the gaming industry.

[–]Noble6 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Actually it's about integrity in gaming journalism /s

[–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]TheRighteousTyrant 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

    BuzzFeed (owned by Gawker)

    Pretty sure it isn't.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BuzzFeed

    [–]sample_material 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I was super interested, but I don't have 40 minutes

    http://i.imgur.com/ZnbxI1H.png

    Speed that shit up!

    [–]SoldierOf4Chan 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Do you have five minutes?

    [–]snoharm 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Heh, this I've seen. Just wanted to hear more about the general nastiness of the site. Obviously Gawker Stalker was insane.

    [–]iamtheyeti311 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    for later

    [–]Im_a_wet_towel 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Jesus, she acts like she's in middle school.

    [–]Arctic_Fax 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Nothing basically, just standard loose morals journalism.

    [–]Trazac 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It's actually only about thirty minutes long (the last ten or so minutes is an extended clip after some black). At 2x speed you can watch it in 15 minutes!

    [–]slacker87 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    That is a decent clip, but my god that guy speaks slowly.

    [–]iamtheyeti311 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    for later

    [–]Arctic_Fax -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    meh. Based on this gawker are no worse than thousands of other media outlets. I mean its all shit, but I don't think its fair to single out one turd, particularly a small rather inoffensive turd (in the scheme of things).

    [–]anonveggy -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    hheeey a 40 Minute commercialized Rant about why Hashtag-Something is bad.

    isnt that guy also the one who feels that "straight white christian males" are persecuted in todays america? im sure Fox News is about to file a lawsuit for having competition.

    I mean fuck gawker... but there really is no morale highground between these 2 parties.

    [–]kinnaq 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Had to read this three times. /r/mildlyinfuriating

    Please, for the love of dog, punctuate.

    [–]Taj_Ramos 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yes, and everyone on this thread is the consumer. They aren't going to change just because Reddit throws hissy fits. In fact they'd get much more revenue if people constantly share it in order to show how terrible they are.

    [–]C2B3 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    555

    [–]ligerzero459 130ポイント131ポイント  (4子コメント)

    It's Gawker. Best to shrug, ignore them and move on. They're not a real news group anyway.

    [–]shoziku 24ポイント25ポイント  (2子コメント)

    No such thing as real news anyway, it's all garbage and lies. Unless it's a friend saying, "Dude, guess what YOU did last night".

    [–]capitalDOOM 22ポイント23ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Dude, guess what YOU did last night

    This is always my least favorite news.

    [–]ligerzero459 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Point of the day right here. Mainstream media is useless

    [–]Andy_B_Goode 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    No! We're going to repost this image every few months for years to come!

    [–]piss_sprinkled_tits[S] 700ポイント701ポイント  (97子コメント)

    Because if men's nudes get leaked it's fucking hilarious but when women's nudes get leaked it's a crime againt humanity.

    [–]carrayhayBLUE 182ポイント183ポイント  (7子コメント)

    Also the aspect of Hulk's being filed under Hulk Hogan and J-Law being filed under Nudes

    [–]kymmiijii 142ポイント143ポイント  (6子コメント)

    The first Hulk Hogan image was filed under "NSFW" and the second under "Hulk Hogan."

    The first Jennifer Lawrence image was filed under "Jennifer Lawrence" and the second under "Nudes."

    Their inconsistencies in filing appear to be laziness, not hypocrisy.

    [–]JustAlexander 18ポイント19ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Or sensational "journalism" at its finest.

    [–]Snoozeybutton 82ポイント83ポイント  (12子コメント)

    The grand majority of people did not think leaking women's nudes was a crime against humanity. Whereas most people don't give a shit about the Hulk Hogan tape.

    You don't see people circulating the Hogan tape, nor do you see anyone defending -- really the only people who think about it at all are people using it as evidence that men's bodies are unfairly exploited compared to women's. Meanwhile, when Jennifer Lawrence's nudes were leaked, huge subreddits were circulating them, everyone was talking about them, and the prevailing opinion was that she had no right to be upset and that it was her fault.

    You'd be hard pressed to find someone jerking it to Hulk Hogan's sex tape. His was also released by someone who hated him in an effort to slander him -- which didn't really work because no one gives a shit -- whereas Jennifer Lawrence's were released by popular demand.

    [–]ButtLusting 15ポイント16ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Is that a challenge??

    [–]krackbaby -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I bet you won't blow me

    [–]Versec 23ポイント24ポイント  (1子コメント)

    We are not discussing if one of the two things is better than the other. We are not even discussing the importance of the people involved, who leaked the pics or for what reason. We are discussing the way a sensationalistic, hypocrite, click-baity website tries to pass a violation of one's privacy as news and defence of free speech, while condemming the other. To both J. Lawrence and Hulk Hogan, their life was affectedby those events.

    Gawker is known for outing people and calling it news:

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gawker-conde-nast-david-geithner_55a90c56e4b0c5f0322d0b2c

    If pictures of me were leaked by someone for whatever reason, I have the same right to justice, even if it is only important to me.

    [–]Snoozeybutton 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Gawker and Jezebel have different editorial staffs, so trying to make a point about their hypocrisy doesn't work. I agree that Gawker is a bunch of shit heads, but OP is trying to make a point about gender double standard that simply doesn't hold up in context.

    [–]teleekom 73ポイント74ポイント  (1子コメント)

    While this is all true, this behavior is still hypocritical. The editor can eat a bucket of bees for the "We won't take it down" line alone.

    [–]-_God_- 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

    True. I think the above post was just trying to point out a realization that not a lot of people would have about this situation.

    It's always nice to get a little perspective.

    [–]DiogenesTheHound 40ポイント41ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Ah so it's okay because Hogan is unattractive.

    [–]Snoozeybutton 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Who said he was unattractive? And who said it was okay?

    [–]superwinner 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    DiogenesTheHound did, right above your comment

    [–]BrocanGawd 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    They are clearly downplaying Hogan being exposed vs Female Celebs.

    [–]candygram4mongo 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You don't see people circulating the Hogan tape,

    You mean, other than Gawker?

    [–]Wallace_Grover 9ポイント10ポイント  (8子コメント)

    They're all by different authors?

    [–]lithedreamer 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    4 different people wrote these articles.

    [–]superwinner 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    women's nudes get leaked it's a crime against humanity

    Catering to their target market.. women. I do not know a many men who gives the much of a fuck about celebrity news of any kind.

    [–]modernbenoni -3ポイント-2ポイント  (1子コメント)

    They are all different authors though. These are not the opinions of one person.

    [–]MonsterBlash 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It's all material paid by Gawker and publish in Gawkers name.
    If an actual newspaper would print a slandering piece, they would still be held responsible, no matter who on their staff wrote it.

    Are you saying those pieces weren't actually published on Gawker? Or that Gawker aren't getting a profit from those pieces? I don't see a disclaimer saying "While we present those pieces, these piece do not reflect the view of Gawker Media" or anything of the sort.

    [–]A_BOMB2012 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It's not hilarious because he's a man, it's hilarious because it's Hulk Hogan.

    [–]Orlitoq -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Its almost like there is more than one standard to which each gets held.....

    コメントをもっと表示する (60 返事)

      [–]SirCrest_YT 63ポイント64ポイント  (4子コメント)

      I'm eager to see "Gawker files for every form of bankruptcy and explodes"

      [–]terrestrialoctopus 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Kill it and five more will just spring up in its place.

      [–]newdoctah 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

      If we want to see that happen we need to stop talking about Gawker to begin with

      [–]im_eddie_snowden 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

      I'm convinced Gawkers gets a good percentage of its shares and views are by its haters. I used to like IO9 (gawkers sci fi pub) but as of late its just one over the top soapboxy outrage article about gender equality in sci fi after another.

      [–]comicsandpoppunkORANGE 11ポイント12ポイント  (3子コメント)

      Bear in mind, Jezebel advertises itself as a feminist blog and Gawker is just your stand shitty gossip site.

      [–]Pudgy_Ninja 232ポイント233ポイント  (29子コメント)

      Different writers, different editors. I mean, I know that they have the same parent company, but you're being kind of silly.

      This is like calling Conde Nast a hypocritical company because Wired has a different take on social media than Teen Vogue.

      [–]katubug 90ポイント91ポイント  (11子コメント)

      This was my reaction as well. However, it does highlight a double standard that's worth being angry about.

      My personal take is that it's because it's more "okay" for guys to be sexual and sexually active. People are more likely to assume a man will be okay with having his "virility" or ability to get laid showcased than a woman would be to have her nude body seen. This is, I think, the same social phenomenon that stigmatizes male rape victims: guys love sex, right? So he must have wanted it. Hulk Hogan was probably proud, rather than dreadfully embarrassed! It's a phenomenon that hurts both sexes, in the end.

      Anyway, sorry for ranting. I do agree that the point of the post is a bit of a stretch, it's just the topic it highlights that I feel strongly about.

      [–]VonFrig 41ポイント42ポイント  (3子コメント)

      You're hitting on something important here: a culture of latent sexism hurts both genders.

      [–]Snoozeybutton 17ポイント18ポイント  (4子コメント)

      I agree that sex double standards are absurd, but to claim that society was up in arms about the Fappening and that everyone took Jennifer Lawrence's side is disingenuous, especially looking at this site.

      The vast majority of people saw no issue with jerking it to Jennifer Lawrence's stolen pictures

      [–]DuckTapeHero 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

      I don't think he was referring to the actual people but the way media was portraying the scandal. No one batted an eye when everyone was spreading lebrons wardrobe malfunction but Jennifer has nudes leaked and its a national scandal

      [–]Snoozeybutton 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Right but the reason it was a national scandal is because so many people were defensive of it.... If her nudes were leaked and we all just agreed that it was fucked up, it would've been a non-issue. The reason it blew up is because so many people were supporting and circulating it. So many people didn't realize, and still don't realize, that having these images was wrong.

      No one batted an eye at Lebron's wardrobe malfunction because no one cared. No one was defending it, no one was fitting for the right to jerk off to it.

      [–]SunriseSurprise -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Women's nudity is valuable. Halle Berry got a mil to show her tits in Swordfish. Show me any guy getting anything remotely close to that for showing his junk. People don't really value seeing dicks.

      So at the most basic level, removing all the intangibles, JLaw's nudes being leaked potentially cost her a lot of money.

      [–]x817 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      "People don't value seeing dicks"

      News reported everywhere about Lebron James' accidently flashing his dick during game and Lenny Kravitz accidently flashing his during concert.

      [–]Pudgy_Ninja 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Totally fair and I don't disagree. If this had just been about the double standard that's held pretty much everywhere across our society, I wouldn't have blinked. But to call out a company for having different opinions across different writers, editors and publications struck me as pretty silly.

      [–]aDAMNPATRIOT -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Lol no

      [–]VonFrig 17ポイント18ポイント  (1子コメント)

      One other thing too is that Gawker DID remove the Hulk Hogan video. What they didn't take down was the post it was embedded in.

      [–]MonsterBlash 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Before or after a judge forced them to do it?

      [–]pixiedonut 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Exactly. Bill O'Reilly has somewhat a noticeably different voice than The Simpsons.

      [–]IIIbrohonestlyIII 5ポイント6ポイント  (3子コメント)

      Don't they have an editor who okays articles, though?

      [–]Pudgy_Ninja 25ポイント26ポイント  (2子コメント)

      Sure, they both do. They aren't the same people though.

      Jezebel has its own editorial staff separate from Gawker.

      I actually double checked this before posting.

      http://jezebel.com/about

      http://gawker.com/about

      [–]IIIbrohonestlyIII 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Makes sense that they seem to have conflicting agendas then.

      [–]yesacabbagez 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      As a long time reader of Deadspin I can assure that there isn't really a conflicting agenda, that's just the way Gawker operates. If I am correct AJ Daulerio was the Gawker editor at the time of the Hogan shit and he had served as Deadspin editor prior to that. This is just how they operate.

      Michael Sam is another recent example of what they will do. When Sam was drafted late, they had multiple articles about how him being gay dropped him int he draft. When the Rams released him it was all about how he deserved to be on the team. He signed with the CFL and was finally going to get him chance to prove he could play, but once again didn't. At the end of the day what he did on the field wasn't justifying him getting more time. WHen he did walk away a couple weeks ago there was basically no mention of it on Deadspin who had been championing him. They had lost any chance of actually convincing people that he was an NFL player because in the actual game time he had, the performance wasn't there. They picked up the story entirely because he was gay and ran with it just to be the ones covering it.

      [–]arahman81YELLOW 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

      And posts about a subreddit's hypocrisy about any subject is already rebutted with the "different people" argument.

      [–]anschelsc 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Highly upvoted posts on a given subreddit were probably voted on by the same people. This is a bit more like complaining about "reddit hypocrisy" by pointing to top posts in two different subreddits.

      [–]justsyr 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

      Was about to comment on this.

      They even have their users hate each other.

      Before the kinja thing I got banned from Jezebel because I had a different opinion. Even some of the most know Kotaku users at that time got banned from Jalopnik and stuff like that.

      They do work like different "companies", at least that was years ago when I read stuff from them.

      [–]An_Lochlannach 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

      It's less about attacking "Gawker media" and more about attacking the mentality on show here, which is prevalent amongst many media outlets and social media types.

      At least that's how I believe it should be viewed, anyway.

      You're right though, Ricky Gervais and Donald Trump have both been employees of Rupert Murdoch media... I somehow doubt their views are consistent.

      [–]Random_Tangent 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

      It's only about attacking Gawker media.

      [–]supyonamesjosh 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

      And different audiences. Of course Jezebel is going to hire editors and writers that are pro women. This would only be hypocrisy if they were on the same site, not the same parent company.

      [–]ColdBlackCage 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Not surprising, people like to nail Gawker for things that don't even do (and yet, ironically cry about 'manufactured outrage'...)

      Gawker is a collaboration of many, many writers that all post their thoughts and finding onto the same website. Yes, contradictions exist due to this method - but that is not hypocrisy.

      I distain Gawker as much as the next guy, but be sure to dislike and denounce for the right reasons, people .

      [–]Moviecommentforyou 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      What are editors? This is why Gawker is flat out unethical and amateurish. Their various networks take no responsibility.

      [–]Ransal 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      It's like expecting motherjones to write about white people without being racist towards them.

      [–]anschelsc 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      They're not even just different editors--they pretty actively dislike each other.

      [–]fat_genius 37ポイント38ポイント  (2子コメント)

      A tabloid aimed at women takes a different view on women's privacy issues that a general audience tabloid, and they're owned by the same commercial conglomerate? Say it ain't so! What happened to the integrity of the gossip press?

      コメントをもっと表示する (1 返事)

        [–]witehare 24ポイント25ポイント  (0子コメント)

        To be fair, they are different sites with different editorial policies and different audiences. Just because they're both owned by one business that makes money through advertising doesn't mean shit about what they'll print.

        [–]REDNOOK 27ポイント28ポイント  (4子コメント)

        Gawker also loves shitting on everything Reddit. They take jabs at it every chance they get, which is ironic considering it's their #1 source for content. Even the commenters get in on the bashing. The irony just fucking kills me.

        [–]12342134536 21ポイント22ポイント  (2子コメント)

        Not like Reddit isn't a deserving target though.

        [–]Flashbomb7 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

        Hell, Reddit takes potshots on itself constantly. It's fun. Reddit has a lot of shit to mock.

        [–]po_toter 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Like the time the guy pretended to be a girl dying of cancer for an article.

        [–]krispness 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Gawker is shit, what a surprise.

        [–]Waddupp 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

        they were all written by different people who have different views

        [–]PixyFreakingStix 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

        But hardly anyone cared about the Hulk Hogan sex tape, and "The Fappening" was one of the biggest events on the internet that year, and one of the biggest events on the internet ever.

        How could you possibly want to compare the two? Had there been a reaction to Hogan like there was to Lawrence, you can bet their headlines would have been different. Or maybe if Lawrence had been a racist piece of shit.

        [–]Sloshy42 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

        So, what makes one okay over the other is whether or not people care? That doesn't sound sketchy at all...

        [–]NorwegianWood28 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Are you implying its okay if someone has opinions you disagree with, it's okay if their nudes get leaked?

        [–]PixyFreakingStix -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I didn't say one was okay, I said one was worse.

        [–]Snoozeybutton 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

        It shouldn't surprise anyone that Gawker is hypocritical -- they are low-grade paparazzi. If you're looking to Gawker as your moral compass, thats a you problem. It should be obvious that circulating stolen and embarrassing images of people who have no affect on you is wrong. It doesn't change the fact that tons of redditors continue to see no wrongdoing with the Fappening.

        To be fair, reddit is perfectly capable of hypocrisy. The same people who point out that Gawker is trash hate Jennifer Lawrence for her audacity at wanting to keep her personal pictures private.

        [–]im_eddie_snowden 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

        IO9 Too

        [–]moeburn 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Yet I've seen the very same users in threads like these who are infuriated at Gawker, post a link to a Gawker article like a week later.

        [–]srios90 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Somebody listened to thebiggestproblemintheuniverse episode 17

        [–]anon0210 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Sauce?

        [–]Aqua-Tech 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Meh. It doesn't matter. JLaw and her lawyers can send all the takedown notices they want. Those pics will never go away. They're out there forever.

        [–]slap_shot_12 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Gawker accused of hypocrisy?? You won't BELIEVE what happens next!!! Click here to find out....

        [–]Blitz_Dat_Anus 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        So? This doesn't seem any more bias towards or against women or males, but rather just pandering to public opinion.

        Popular opinions at the time of Jlaws leak was that they need to be taken down and that it was petty.

        But sure, this is reddit: The male equivalent of the ridiculous feminism movement and that means actual investigation doesn't matter.

        [–]XxALTANxX 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I wouldn't call that 'mildly' infuriating. I'd call it 'fat feminist' level infuriating.

        [–]ColdFire86 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        And hey, if you point out this hypocrisy you're a fat neckbeard loser that's sexist somehow.

        [–]Rekuja 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I feel this belongs in mensrights

        [–]BrocanGawd 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        "Mildy Frustrating"

        And that's why they get away with this kind of shit.

        [–]tm0g 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        yeah these gawker authors are total hypocrites because they don't all share the same opinion.

        [–]THE_MAN_OF_THE_YEAR -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

        This isn't just mildly infuriating.

        [–]sakkara 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        /r/MensRights

        [–]0j0s 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Ridiculous double standards like this are everywhere.

        [–]arahman81YELLOW -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Different sites (under the same conglomerate) posts articles different views- hypocrisy.
        Two posts on the same subreddit with conflicting views- different people.

        Huh?

        [–]duffstoic -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Hogan (probably) made and leaked the tape on purpose to get fame though, whereas Jennifer Lawrence had her iCloud account hacked and her private photos stolen without her permission.

        Source

        [–]lostinthestar -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Redditry at its finest

        https://www.reddit.com/r/TumblrAtRest/comments/3axslz/double_standards_anyone/

        title points age /r/ comnts
        Gawker Media on men vs Gawker Media on women: the strange case of Hulk Hogan 725 2mos KotakuInAction 55
        The media's double standard on naked celeb leaks is laughable. 1555 10mos funny 87
        Reminder that Gawker posted Hulk Hogan's sex tape and then complained about the iCloud leaks 3876 10mos TumblrInAction 713
        "Equality" 1144 10mos funny 195
        Gawker Media: Hulk Hogan sex tape vs the fappening leaks. 267 11mos funny 27
        x-post from TiA. gawker media treatment of hulk hogan sex tape vs the fappening leaks. double standard anybody? 424 11mos MensRights 29
        Gawker media - outraged at nude leaks, but only if they're of women 282 11mos SRSsucks 40
        Oh Gawker Media. You so silly. 4060 11mos TumblrInAction 1062
        Gawker media gender bias 2664 11mos funny 578

        [–]skeletorcares -3ポイント-2ポイント  (1子コメント)

        The truth of the situation is the one exposed major Apple security issues. The other did not. Care to take a guess at which is which?

        [–]crowthateatsgarbage 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I can't conceive of why you're being downvotes for this.

        [–]dellintelbitcoin -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Who the hell hosts a video of someone having sex, that was recorded without his consent. Thats fucked up!

        [–]SecretSnack -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

        Wasn't only the audio of the Hogan sex tape released?

        And doesn't that make kind of a lot of difference?

        [–]Benn_The_Human -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

        To be fair, it's on one Man and one Woman, but yes it's completely inconsistent. I used to love gawker, but now it makes me wretch to think of it.

        [–]Elementium -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

        We should call this post Mildly Overreacting.

        I read through it a few times before I had to come to the comments to figure out what the hell I'm supposed to be outraged by.

        [–]Uhhbysmal -3ポイント-2ポイント  (2子コメント)

        Gee I guess men are the TRULY oppressed ones in society right? Better upvote this to the top /s

        [–]attacktei 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

        Isn't it about equality?

        [–]Uhhbysmal 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I'm just really apathetic to reddit's idea of equality. Posts like this which point out (justified and legitimate) double standards about men get a shit ton of upvotes and support.

        But any article that dare mentions women at a disadvantage is immediately argued against, downvoted, and dismissed.

        [–]Expand_dong420angry feeemale -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

        I'm pretty sure the media beats down women more than men, this is a shit example. Gawker is laaaame.

        コメントをもっと表示する (6 返事)