use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
170 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
About /r/Fantasy is a subreddit dedicated to news, discussion, AMAs, charities and interaction related to the greater Fantasy genre. Rules Please Be Kind. No Memes. Follow the Self-Promotion Guidelines. Follow the Referral Links Policy. Connect Signup: The Fantasy Writer of the Day Past Fantasy AMAs Show Us Your Books Book Bingo Reading Challenge Stabby Award Winners Goodreads Group /r/Fantasy_Bookclub Live Chat on Snoonet @ #Fantasy Get Answers to Writing Questions Create Spoiler Tags With: [description](#s "the hidden spoiler text") description
/r/Fantasy is a subreddit dedicated to news, discussion, AMAs, charities and interaction related to the greater Fantasy genre.
Create Spoiler Tags With: [description](#s "the hidden spoiler text") description
Fantasy Recommendations Recommendations Guide Read the /r/Fantasy "Top" Lists Women in Fantasy Table & More Spanish SF&F Week Fantasy Comics Speculative Fiction Websites Fantasy-Related Subreddits /r/Fantasy Exclusives Upcoming Book Releases
Switch to Night Mode
Switch to Day Mode
Past Fantasy AMAs
2015 Hugo Winners (locusmag.com)
unconundrum が 9時間前 投稿
[–]undo-undo-undo 57ポイント58ポイント59ポイント 9時間前 (11子コメント)
No Award had a big evening!
[–]unconundrum[S] 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント 9時間前 (1子コメント)
Apparently, No Award had only won five times in the history of the award, and tonight's awards matched that.
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
Color me unsurprised...
[–]KristaDBallAMA Author Krista D. Ball 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント 9時間前 (3子コメント)
I did like how people kept calling it "Noah Ward" on Twitter :)
[–]shadowsong42 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Not only that, but David Gerrold (the emcee this year) has published some stuff under the pen name of Noah Ward.
[–]wardsalud 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 53分前 (1子コメント)
Noah Ward sounds like an excellent author name. Very authory.
[–]KristaDBallAMA Author Krista D. Ball 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 47分前 (0子コメント)
It's excellent.
[–]Ankari 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間前 (4子コメント)
Why were there so many No Awards?
[–]gailosaurus 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (3子コメント)
Here's a link, or you could google "Sad Puppies" (not joking) to read more.
http://www.npr.org/2015/08/22/432881261/everyones-likely-to-be-sad-at-this-years-hugos?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20150822#commentBlock
[–]Ankari 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Thanks for the link. Now I'm interested in how they plan to adjust their voting structure.
[–]ChickenOverlord 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
The coalition argues that conservative, straight, white (and mostly male) writers are being shut out by "affirmative action" voting. So for three years running, they've mounted a campaign to take over the Hugos and fill the ballot with their preferred brand of nominees.
A slate that includes a bunch of women, gays, and minorities was how they sought to keep sci-fi and fantasy exclusive to white men? How does that work exactly?
[–]gailosaurus 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
I don't pretend to know the mind of crazy people, but I think if you compare their slate to likely nominees in absence of it, you'll find it dominated by the straight-white-male comparatively. As I understand it, there's also some kind of "politics" thinking behind it as well, whatever that means.
[–]Hypercles 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 9時間前 (3子コメント)
http://www.thehugoawards.org/content/pdf/2015HugoStatistics.pdf
This years statistics for anyone who wants them.
[–]Lanodantheon 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント 8時間前 (2子コメント)
Reading the pdf....The Slow Regards of Silent Things was 22 Votes short of getting on the Ballet. Now I'm sad...
Looking at the numbers... The Slates knocked off a lot of good works in the nomination phase. Most by a wide margin(like over 100 votes), some by smaller margins.
[–]Hypercles 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
That is sad. It so deserved to win a Hugo, it was brilliant.
Edit: I also see Jackalope Wives missed out for best short story (by about 60 votes), which is also a shame as that was a fantastic short.
[–]KristaDBallAMA Author Krista D. Ball 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2分前 (0子コメント)
I know, right? Only 22 votes. Geez. That was close. :(
[–]unconundrum[S] 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント 9時間前 (5子コメント)
Also, as some folk on twitter are saying, kudos on Marko Kloos, who withdrew his slate-nomination for Lines of Departure and let The Three-Body Problem onto the ballot.
[–]ydeliane 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 3時間前 (3子コメント)
What was his reasoning for doing so?
[–]deathtotheemperor 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
“It has come to my attention that Lines of Departure was one of the nomination suggestions in Vox Day’s ‘Rabid Puppies’ campaign. I cannot in good conscience accept an award nomination that I feel I may not have earned solely with the quality of the nominated work. I also wish to disassociate myself from the originator of the ‘Rabid Puppies’ campaign. To put it bluntly: if this nomination gives even the appearance that Vox Day or anyone else had a hand in giving it to me because of my perceived political leanings, I don’t want it. I want to be nominated for awards because of the work, not because of the ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ politics.”
From his blog
[–]Jota-Pe 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
This is the biggest travesty of what the puppies did to me. They usurped others works for a cause and robbed them of the chance to actual win the award legitimately, which is ironic because from what I understand that is one of the things their cause was trying to prevent albeit with the skew this was excluding fun fantasy and scifi from winning in the name of social justice.
[–]ydeliane 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Ahh okay thanks, I had no idea it was related to the puppies thing.
[–]Eko_Mister 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 19分前 (0子コメント)
He's the real MVP.
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 26ポイント27ポイント28ポイント 9時間前 (22子コメント)
This is ... about as good as could be hoped for? I still think City of Stairs was robbed though.
[–]devotedpupa 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 9時間前 (4子コメント)
Ñeeeee I would've preferred if Guardians of the Galaxy didn't win. Winter Soldier was better and both were more superheroe than sci-fi/fantasy when compared to Interstellar or Edge of Tomorrow, even if they are arguably better.
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 21ポイント22ポイント23ポイント 9時間前 (3子コメント)
Yeah that's definitely a matter of personal taste. I voted for Edge of Tomorrow, but GoG was good, I'm not sad to see it win.
[–]devotedpupa 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 9時間前 (2子コメント)
I'm more surprised than sad. Thoroughly enjoyable movie, just not award darling material.
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 9時間前 (1子コメント)
The Hugo Dramatic Long Form is usually quite populist -- almost always big-budget blockbuster-type stuff rather than the kind of thing that wins movie awards.
Like the last few were Gravity, Inception, GoT Season 1, and Avengers.
[–]klyberess 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
I thought Gravity won a ton of awards.
[–]7Pedazos 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 9時間前 (11子コメント)
Absolutely. I read that shortly after the nominations, and my first thought was, if not for the slate voting, this would be nominated.
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 9時間前 (6子コメント)
We'll see when the nomination totals are released, but I suspect that may be literally true.
[–]jeremyteg 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 8時間前 (4子コメント)
They've been released, and at least according to Tobias Bucknell's analysis it would have been. http://www.tobiasbuckell.com/2015/08/23/what-the-alternate-hugo-ballot-would-likely-have-been/
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 8時間前 (3子コメント)
Yeah. The Martian would also have been a strong contender for the award.
[–]Hypercles 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
The Martian would have been disqualified, as it had previously been self published back in 2011.
[–]relentlessreadingWorldbuilders 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
I think the Martian would have been disqualified due to previous publication. Shame about City of Stairs.
[–]jeremyteg 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
For sure, not that The Three Body Problem wasn't deserving.
[–]Gamethyme 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
City of Stairs is the fourth one below the "On the Ballot" line.
Page 18 of this PDF.
[–]devotedpupa 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 8時間前 (3子コメント)
Would "The Martian" have been allowed to get in?
[–]Hypercles 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
It might have had the nominations, but it would have been disqualified as it was first self published in 2011.
[–]7Pedazos 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Looks like "The Martian" received 6.9% of the nominations and was tenth highest nominated.
So it likely would have been one of the final five, but it would have been close.
[–]jeremyteg 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Quite possibly, as least according to Tobias Bucknell's analysis: http://www.tobiasbuckell.com/2015/08/23/what-the-alternate-hugo-ballot-would-likely-have-been/
[–]eean 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 7時間前 (1子コメント)
Yea if we just remove the Puppy nominations it would've been on the ballot, albeit in fifth place.
Of course Three Body Problem won and it was in seventh place in the nominations!
Regardless remember that Hugo is a scifi award that occasionally rewards fantasy. I think Three Body Problem winning 2649 v 2449 over Goblin Emperor is a good example. It's close, Goblin Emperor certainly could've won, but it didn't.
[–]Hypercles 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
No it would have been third. Scalzis Lock In, would have been 4th on the ballot and Bennett's City of Stairs would have been 5th.
[–]MattieShoes 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
SON OF A BITCH! I've been trying to remember the name of that book for a week now. I could remember the entire plot, but only in generalities so I couldn't turn up anything with google. I even wrote a whole TOMT post, then deleted it because it felt like endless spoilers.
Thanks :-)
[–]unconundrum[S] 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 9時間前 (1子コメント)
I agree, and love Bennett's books. Thrilled it's nominated for World Fantasy, though I'm suspecting VanderMeer's got that one.
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
You may be right; in fairness, I still need to read those. But CoS blew me away.
[–]photonlongsword 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 9時間前 (4子コメント)
So happy that Three Body Problem won. Not my favourite book this year, but it is definitely encouraging that a translation won best novel. Hopefully this encourages more publishers to bring non-English work to the fore.
[–]csuzw 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 6時間前 (2子コメント)
I agree that it's encouraging to see a non-English work win, however, I honestly thought it was 1 of the worst books I read this year. I'm at a loss to see what people see in it other than the fact it's non-English. It starts off decently but it declines into nonsense science and absurdly unrealistic behaviour and dialogue on every characters parts.
[–]EltaninAntenna 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
nonsense science and absurdly unrealistic behaviour and dialogue
To be fair, this isn't an obstacle to success by most SF...
[–]photonlongsword 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
As I said, it wasn't my favourite work this year either. However, it clearly got enough people excited for them to want to vote for it. I wouldn't put it down to the book being of non-English origin.
[–]gmrm4n 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
I read an article about the Three-Body trilogy and other Chinese Sci-Fi in an old Wired magazine. Are they any good? Where can I find translations of them?
[–]Lanodantheon 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント 9時間前 (53子コメント)
My personal take on the awards this year(I watched the Live Stream):
Great ceremony.
Only one Puppy-related win: Guardians of The Galaxy.
But that movie was really really REALLY good so, meh...
The Award for most annoying presenter (for some people on my twitter feed) went to Dalek Rainier. Some people don't like fanmade Daleks I guess...
The Award for Best Presenter and Most Epic Presentation of an Award went to the Astronaut from the ISS giving Best Hugo to the Three Body Problem which was ten kinds of awesome. I'll need to read that book now...
Top Winner of the Night was No Award. He/She had a speech prepared, unfortunately it consisted entirely of foul language, rude gestures, obscene signage and was covered up by a lot of applause and some booing.
[–]SecondaryHammerSmith 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 9時間前 (10子コメント)
Guardians of the Galaxy is puppy related ? It seems odd for them to signal out one that had such a good chance of winning.
[–]Lanodantheon 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 8時間前 (9子コメント)
It was on the Sad Puppies slate. I'm not sure about the Rabids. Otherwise the night followed this guide to a T: http://deirdre.net/the-puppy-free-hugo-award-voters-guide/
[–]SecondaryHammerSmith 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 8時間前 (8子コメント)
Do you know their reasoning for claiming the movie as their own ? It just seems like such an odd choice.
[–]Hypercles 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 8時間前 (1子コメント)
They liked it and nominated it. The dramatic presentation categories were just about them nominating what they liked. But after looking at the stats, it looks like it would have made the Hugos regardless of puppy votes.
[–]eean 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Yea 'no award' didn't rank at all for both dramatic presentation categories.
[–]mallamp_ 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
It's non-leftist space opera, I guess that's reason enough
[–]EltaninAntenna -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 3時間前 (4子コメント)
Since it was probably going to win anyway, they score a "free" win.
[–]relentlessreadingWorldbuilders 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間前 (3子コメント)
It gave them ammo when some of the question qualified editors on their slates didn't win.
[–]Koppenberg 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 47分前 (2子コメント)
It also gives them human shields against criticism of their attitudes. By choosing nominees with huge fan bases, they get to say "Are you calling Guardians of the Galaxy and Marvel bigoted? <faux outrage>"
I half suspect the Butcher nomination was an attempt to goad their critics into insulting the Butcher/Dresden fan base. Thankfully, Butcher's fans (like Annie Ballet) didn't like being cast in the roll of the ball in someone else's game.
[–]relentlessreadingWorldbuilders 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 38分前 (1子コメント)
Annie Bellet and Kary English seemed to be on there to deflect the White-male arguments as well.
[–]Koppenberg -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 16分前 (0子コメント)
One of the big outcomes of all this for me is that I'm now a huge Annie Bellet fan. I can totes see why the Puppies chose Goodnight, Stars as a beard. It's about a Latina college student who rebels against her parents with Conservative politics and uses a handgun as a personal protection weapon to protect her soldier boyfriend and herself.
It's also a damn good story. I would have voted it above No Award on merit if she'd stayed on the ballet, but she withdrew with wit and grace. So, as a consolation prize, I've bought a stack of her books and have been enjoying.
(It's also worth noting that Goodnight, Moon is an even better story than Goodnight, Stars and that John Joseph Adams is the short-form editor who put out the anthologies that both were published in. Adams was the first short-form editor to miss the ballot after the puppies slate. It's a travesty.
[–]devotedpupa 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 9時間前 (11子コメント)
So sad many authors now have that ugly spectrum above them. I like Skin Game even if assholes did too. Hope this newspaper roll up slap make the puppies behave.
[–]Hypercles 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 7時間前 (8子コメント)
I think the only authors with the ugly spectrum above them, will be those who actually got involved in the drama. I can't see most (there will always be people who are willing to do anything) people holding it against say Butcher.
Others like Wright, Antonelli and Kratman, I think will have being a puppy stuck to their reputation for good or bad from now on.
[–]Tekomandor 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Kratman had a reputation to tarnish?
[–]eean 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7時間前 (6子コメント)
it casts something of a shadow that they didn't turn down the nomination like Kloos did.
[–]Hypercles 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 7時間前 (5子コメント)
I mean I kinda agree. I think it was cool of Kloss to turn down his nomination. But you can't really blame someone for not wanting to turn down a nomination for an award, particularly a Hugo.
Especially when they stayed out of the drama. I mean I have gone out and read Kloss lines of departure (and rather enjoyed it) because of what he did. But at the same time the only authors I will actively avoid after this puppy drama, are those who got involved in the drama.
I don't think this is a great loss as authors like Wright are not that great, if his short fiction is anything to go by. Nor is it that big of a loss to the puppy authors as I somehow don't think that I am their target audience.
And Antonelli is the only one I think will have issue finding people to publish his stories in the future. And that all comes down to him publishing a email (with contact ingo) by a publisher rejecting a work of his, after he sent a letter to the police about David Gerrold being 'violently insane'. It doesn't help him either that it all ended up with said publisher receiving death threats over their decision.
[–]eean 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7時間前 (4子コメント)
Yea for sure there won't be any shunning, outside of the authors you mention. I went to Kevin J. Anderson's reading at WorldCon, it was fine, and I'm sure he will be welcome in the future as well.
Maybe less GoHers etc until people forget this happened. Which hopefully won't be long. :)
[–]Hypercles -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 6時間前 (2子コメント)
I went to Kevin J. Anderson's reading at WorldCon
Lucky. I wish I had been able to attend worldcon this year (or any year). But living in New Zealand makes these things hard to do.
[–]eean 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 6時間前 (1子コメント)
Middle Earth 2020 has been promised for years now. Do not disappoint us.
[–]Hypercles 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
That would be the best thing ever. Even if Australia could get a worldcon. 2020 also gives me enough time to finish the book i'm writing so I could attend as both fan and writer.
It was cool to hear that Helsinki won its bid.
[–]Temptime19 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
I just read Monster Hunters International and I really liked it, but then I realized who the author was and don't plan on reading any more of it.
[–]Lanodantheon 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント 8時間前 (1子コメント)
It won't. The puppies declared victory under all conditions months ago.
If the no award swept the ballet, they win. If their picks win, they win.
Anything in between is still a win to them or so I have read and personally hypothesize.
The Puppies will continue to cry foul and do the same crap until they just do the American thing and....make their own award for goodness sake. That is their best option truth-be-told. They could call it the "Puppy Award." or "Trufan supercoolawesomeness Award" I don't care. I'd probably vote on it too.
Note: I also liked Skin Game...but it wasn't Award worthy. It didn't break any new ground. It didn't take chances. It was not better than anything else on the market. It was a "regularly scheduled episode of The Dresden Files." Comparatively speaking it was just an okay episode of the Dresden Files. Which I will still happily read and play the RPG of same like I have played for for the past 5 years.
In fact, I'll even go as far as to say that Skin Game was a let down for this Dresden fan. Spoilers: Spoiler
I seriously doubt Jim was like some behind-the-scenes Puppy mastermind, but even if he was I'd probably still read his books because he's built up a lot of Fan Good Will.
Dresden won't win a Hugo until the Apocalyptic Trilogy.
...or a "Musical Episode" complete with sheet music. I'd vote for that one.
[–]Fistocracy 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Yeah as far as they're concerned, this year's result has "proved" that the big scary left wing conspiracy was real all along and that it's not just a bad dream conjured up by Theodore Beale having too much spicy food before bedtime one night.
[–]bazhip 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 9時間前 (29子コメント)
I haven't been following this. What do you mean by Puppy?
[–]Hypercles 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
A group (of mostly conservative authors) created a slate for their followers to vote for. They called themselves the sad puppies.
They basically are of the opinion that affirmative action and message are the only reason anything wins in the Hugos anymore.
Because they were organised the managed to get almost everything on their slate into the Hugo ballot. Thats why no award won a few categories this year. People decided they would not support an organised campaign for the Hugos. So categories they swept went to no award.
[–]unconundrum[S] 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 9時間前 (4子コメント)
There were two sorta-overlapping slates run this year. Slates aren't technically against the rules, but no one's really done them before. Slate-voting is getting a number of people to all vote the exact same way.
One of these called itself the Sad Puppies, and it suggested that 'fun' science fiction isn't allowed anymore, only academic, elitist, and progressive science fiction. (This is pretty easily disproved by looking at the recent Hugo wins, but whatever.)
The other puppy group were the rabid puppies, who are led by Vox Day, aka Theodore Beale, aka the only guy to get kicked out of the Science Fiction Writers of America for being extremely racist in their public feed.
Oddly enough, Brad Torgersen, one of the two Sad Puppy leaders, and Vox Day were constant commenters on John Scalzi's blog years ago, and now both hate him and blame basically everything on him.
Uuuuuh I didn't know this. Do you have more? I need more popcorn.
[–]unconundrum[S] 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 8時間前 (2子コメント)
Eh, for a lot of it you'd need to read the comments from posts that are probably at least four years old.
Here's Vox Day getting a Big Idea piece on Scalzi's blog though:
http://whatever.scalzi.com/2008/04/08/the-big-idea-vox-day/
[–]relentlessreadingWorldbuilders 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 7時間前 (1子コメント)
There was also some flap on a blog in 2006 or so (Making Light, maybe?) where Scalzi was passionately defending VD.
[–]Hypercles 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Yea people were not happy that Day was on the jury for the Nebular awards. And Scalzi defended his right to be on the jury as he was a SFWA member.
But then Scalzi was in president when the SFWA kicked Day out for using their twitter feed to tweet a racist attack against another author. I get the feeling that Day blames Scalzi.
[–]chonggo 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 6時間前 (6子コメント)
It's kind of weird, because nearly all of their complaints don't make much sense. They seem to be a bunch of angry people looking for an excuse to be angry, and cherry-picking examples to indulge their rage.
[–]Hypercles 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 6時間前 (4子コメント)
cherry-picking examples to indulge their rage
And that even that many. The only works they ever named as examples of what was wrong with the Hugos was, the short story 'If you were a dinosaur my love', Scalzi's Redshirts and Ancillary Justice.
[–]chonggo 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 5時間前 (3子コメント)
Good point. And a lot of their rage seems to be directed at bloggers who seem to be opposed to their opinions.
[–]Hypercles 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 5時間前 (2子コメント)
Particularly Scalzi. They really hate him. I think personally its the biggest thing that shot the puppies in the foot. If they had talked about works they did not like and explained how their tastes were different from worldcons. They might have been more welcomed.
[–]chonggo 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 5時間前 (1子コメント)
That I don't get. Personally, I really don't care for care his books, or literary SF(not really the same), but so what? Lots of other people enjoy it and there's plenty of other stuff that suits me. Why bother getting excited because there's a book you don't like?
[–]Hypercles 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
Oh yea, it has nothing to do with his books. It's all down to his blog and him being president of the SFWA when Vox Day was removed (for using the offical twitter to tweet racist comments at a fellow author).
Almost every mention of redshirts boils down to 'Scalzi wrote it, has to be shit'.
Yea I mean i'm not going to out of my way to read John C Wright, as I think he says horrible things and I don't enjoy the stuff he writes. But at the same time i'm not going to use the fact that people like what he writes to make an argument about genre fiction. Its just stupid, people have different tastes.
[+]GetMeOffReddit スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11ポイント-10ポイント-9ポイント 9時間前 (14子コメント)
A group of people think that the awards have been... rigged in a way. That only people who are of a certain political standing/opinion and are, in short, some form of minority or modern day "Victim" are winning the awards.
This assumption is that basically this competition is rigged and isn't actually an award for best work, but rather the award for best "insert social justice movement content/author politics" award.
So this group of people chose to get involved in the competition in the same way everyone else had previously been. They voted with their wallets and got several of their favorite books chosen. Some of these authors are hated among this subreddits crowd. Some are good, some aren't.
The backlash was phenomenal. People started accusing this group (The puppies) of trying to threaten women from getting published.
A lot of lies were spread and it made the hugos look very bad, not necessarily because a group of people worked together to nominate books that they liked but rather because of how much drama was caused by these actions.
I've seen several people threaten Butcher, for example, about what they would do to his "Cis sexist ass" if he accepted the award if he had won.
Even reading through these comments its clear that people weren't hoping that certain books would win based off of their own merits... but instead that they hoped that certain books would lose simply because of their personal political views and how much they hated the people that nominated those books in the first place.
That, to me, is depressing and shows what a mess this truly is.
Edit: Oh, and odds are that I will be downvoted for giving this shakedown of the events in this way. I'm not following the common trend on this subreddit where everyone and everything has to be following the exact same political agenda. So, as they say around here, bring on the downvotes, I guess.
[–]MaesterCat 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 8時間前 (3子コメント)
Something that I found interesting is that the "slate" manner probably took away from the possibilities of those nominees challenging the "No Award." It seems to me that it backfired in that it split all those possible votes, beyond even whatever hard feelings arose.
Just shows a bit of a difference between wanting a particular work to win, or ensuring "No Award" would win. If you just want to make a point about the voting, this works. But if you have a work that you think should win on its merits, it's best not to crowd the field. I'm thinking like how some people see Donald Trump, without winning the GOP nomination and running as an independent, would probably take enough votes away from the regular candidate so the Dems would win.
Just a thought I have about the tactics, not the motivations.
[–]Hypercles 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 8時間前 (1子コメント)
It still wouldn't have been enough, nor in the end does the splitting of the vote matter. As votes are counted in a runoff system.
Take novella for example. No Award received 3495 votes, the combined vote of the nominated novellas only came out to 2112 votes.
[–]MaesterCat 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
Truth, it would not have change the final outcome, just the margin of victory. But the idea is more of a change from the "slate" of nominees, to a more head to head judgement.
Plus I have learned that there is no such thing as a perfectly disciplined electorate. Unless we are talking about how Stalin and Saddam Hussein had those near perfect elections.
[–]GetMeOffReddit 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
To be honest, that's a fair way to look at it though. Obviously nobody won tonight, and the people celebrating "No Award" don't seem to be getting how much of an issue this is.
Tonight wasn't a victory for anybody, instead it's just a clusterfuck. The tactics weren't great, and I say that about both sides in all honesty.
I hope that next year more good books win. Without the politics and the tactics. Without the agendas and rubbing elbows. Just... good books, judged fairly, and voted on.
[–]Ketomatic 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 9時間前* (9子コメント)
For the record I wasn't going to downvote you till your edit, get off the cross.
That aside, I mostly agree with you! The main problem I had with the puppies was how massively negative they were. You can support your picks without being an asshole or acting the martyr. They did neither of those things.
Nobody won tonight and I agree 100% that people should just vote on merit and merit alone.
[+]GetMeOffReddit スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント 8時間前 (8子コメント)
I'll keep my cross, thanks. I've seen the voting trends on this subreddit enough times to be willing to tell people off for the way they vote.
But beyond that, yeah. Tonight was nobody's win. I'm no fan of Vox Day, and I'm certainly not a fan of the judges of this competition at this point. I just want books to be judged for what is contained between their own pages.
Maybe next year we'll get a more fair run. I certainly hope so.
[–]Hypercles 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 8時間前 (7子コメント)
I just want books to be judged for what is contained between their own pages.
Thats the same argument made by those who No Awarded the slated nominees. There argument is that the slate got works onto the ballot via means other than merit.
[–]GetMeOffReddit -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 8時間前 (6子コメント)
Both sides are accusing the other side of the same thing. And instead of books getting judged, then and there, for what was inside of them people instead chose to vote based off of their own political leanings and knee-jerk reactions.
The end result was this sorry mess.
[–]MaesterCat 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
One consideration: the use of "Slate" nominating drove those choices to constitute the whole of some categories. That left those who opposed the tactic with the same argument that you use. Other works weren't able to make it through nomination because bloc voting. Some people see those works as being more deserving and refuse to cast a ballot on what they see as a tainted field.
[–]shhhhquiet 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Why are works that don't deserve to be there in the first place entitled to due consideration by voters who know how they got on the ballot? Why I should play along with the puppies and read and rank a stack of fiction I already know isn't worth my time when I know the nominees crowded out work that is worth my time?
And for the record, I too downvoted you purely because of your edit.
[–]flickering_truth 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 8時間前 (3子コメント)
Drives me crazy when people put 'i guess this will be downvoted' or other comments like 'late to the party but...' i am so busy focusing on these whiny attention seeking comments that i don't care how valid the rest of their comment is. If you expect to be downvoted then just say your opinion and like an adult expect to wear that it won't be popular. People don't have to agree with you just because getting downvoted annoys you.
[+]GetMeOffReddit スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント 8時間前 (2子コメント)
A. You responded to the wrong comment.
B. Downvote away.
C. Considering that people misuse the voting system as an "I agree, I disagree" system, I'm going to call them out on their behavior. If you don't like it then that's fine, you do you.
[–]TheManWithNoHair 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
I don't post on reddit much myself but one thing I have noticed about /r/fantasy is Hugo and other similar ideological dramas invite a lot of outside traffic. I think the sub tends to be more centrist when that's not happening so I wouldn't get too bent out of shape about voting trends. A lot of people have grown wise and just avoid these threads.
[–]flickering_truth 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
I responded to the correct comment. It took several holier-than-though judgement comments by you to motivate me to comment. People can downvote you for whatever reason they want to. It's their reddit too. Deal with it. Leave it to the mods to police how a thread will be managed. The best thing you can do is say your piece and then let it go. You can't control reddit, and quite frankly it's not that important. It's just reddit. I agreed with what your original point was, along with many things said on this thread. But i will not listen to your message if you are stamping your foot.
[–]blalien -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
https://www.opendemocracy.net/transformation/miles-schneiderman/sad-puppies-rabid-chauvinists-will-raging-white-guys-succeed-in-hi
[–]TheManWithNoHair 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント 8時間前* (13子コメント)
Hugo has turned into such a shitshow and it's not just the puppies, but every single one of these little Hugo cliques that are all about turning things into a brawl rather than working with people. You guys are kidding yourselves if you think the Puppies aren't going to double down next year.
Maybe you can't talk with someone like Vox Day and his fandom. Everything I've seen from the Brad Torgerson and Larry Correia side of things however suggests that working/talking with them rather than going on the offensive might actually work out. I'm really fed up with staunch ideologues from all sides and I know I should just stop paying attention. To me, no awarding doesn't seem any more gracious than dominating the nomination slate, you are both keeping your declared 'enemies' from having any chance at an award.
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 8時間前 (3子コメント)
I don't disagree that the Puppies are going to double down. The thing is, it's pretty clear that Vox's fandom is the core of the puppy thing -- going by the stats, they account for 200-250 votes, most of the 300 that is the puppy high water mark.
To me, the difference is that with the puppy nominations, a minority triumphed over a majority, whereas the No Award wins are the other way around. In the Novella category, for example, Puppy votes account for ~300 people out of ~1000 voting, yet they took all five slots on the ballot. In the final vote, OTOH, "No Award" got ~3500 of ~5400 votes, easily more than half the total. So while it may not be more gracious, the final No Award is more indicative of the will of the voters.
What really needs to happen is the nomination rules need to change. The final vote uses an instant runoff system, but the nomination is simple totals and vulnerable to manipulation.
[–]Hypercles 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
The final vote uses an instant runoff system, but the nomination is simple totals and vulnerable to manipulation.
That is up for debate tomorrow during the business meeting. I think it has a good chance at passing. But it won't come into effect till Helsinki (if it gets ratified next year as well).
I see what you're saying about the numbers, they all just really seem like a drop in the bucket to me. I've never been a Hugo target myself and if the fandom groups I identified with showed up at worldcon... kindle authors would be winning left and right. I just don't see the situation getting any better by No Awarding, and I don't think it's something to celebrate. I guess if worldcon ostracizes more and more fandoms just to spite the puppies, then that might bring up attendance as more people gather to defend what they love. Certainly won't make things any more civilized though.
[–]stephencrawford 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Will be interesting to see how the future nomination process plays out. I'm sure WorldCon has had many months to come up with a solid solution. Hopefully this makes the awards even better in the future. Would be nice to see strong nominations along with strong final votes with zero "No Awards" next year.
[–]shhhhquiet 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 7時間前 (8子コメント)
Why do they deserve to be 'talked to' and 'worked with' any more than the creators of the award-worthy works they crowded off he ballot? Why should people vote for drek just because there's nothing but drek to vote for?
If they want more of their brand of genre fiction nominated, they should be encouraging people who like what they like to sign up and vote for what they enjoyed, not exploiting the process with a slate of mostly not-very-good nominees.
[–]TheManWithNoHair 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 7時間前 (7子コメント)
I actually don't agree that many of the Puppy nominations over the past few years have been any worse than previous winners. It's just fandoms, tastes and cliques that aren't normally represented at Hugo.
[–]shhhhquiet 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
The word 'clique' is so overused in this discussion as to be essentially meaningless. The puppies use it as code for 'people who enjoy fiction I don't.'
This is all about 'taste.' If the only way one 'taste' can be represented on the ballot is by slate voting, that 'taste' does not merit inclusion on the ballot. Nobody should be expected to vote for fiction they didn't like, because if people don't like a work of fiction and wouldn't re comment it to others, that fiction isn't doing it's job.
[–]Hypercles 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 7時間前 (5子コメント)
But how do you define wider fandoms tastes? Should the Hugos become a who sold the most books this year award? If 50 shades has proven anything its that sales does not equal quality. Also worth noting that the best selling Scifi or fantasy book of last year was one of the books in the Divergent series. I forget exactly which one, but all three sold over a million copies each, far out selling anything else Scifi or fantasy.
If its about what people are talking about. Well then that all depends on community. For example if you look over at Goodreads and the number of reviews books get, then YA would swept the Hugos. Not even massively popular series like the Dresden files can compete with YA numbers.
And if it is just about community, then the community that is worldcon are the only people who matter. And the Hugo nominees and winners reflect what worldcon likes.
[–]TheManWithNoHair 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 7時間前 (4子コメント)
So what if Vox Day shows up with a few thousand hardcore fans and outvotes everyone else? Would we be alright with them No Awarding multiple categories because Lord Day isn't on the list? Every year people are denied the author/book they REALLY wanted to vote for, do they not still vote?
I am not convinced that No Awarding isn't anything more than a lot of vindictiveness. I've seen how people have treated authors on the Sad Puppies slate even when they had nothing to do with being nominated by them in the first place. You're not denying the Puppies anything by No Awarding, you're just giving them more ammunition to work with. It's practically their victory condition.
[–]Hypercles 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 6時間前 (3子コメント)
If Vox Day organises a campaign to no award. Which is what he is currently doing, because he thinks the only solution to things now is to burn down the Hugos. I am sure people will be pissed.
If he can actually do it because he has the numbers, well people will be pissed but he would be a majority.
Its not just that people could not vote for things that they wanted to, like a normal year. The no awarding was meant as sending a message that worldcon wont tolerate campaigns for the Hugos. As if that becomes an accepted and normal things the Hugos will change for the worse. Most people who I have seen say they no awarded all slate nominees, have said they would have done the same no matter who organised the slate.
Any outcomes was going to be a victory condition for them. No award means they were right all along, if they won awards it proved that what they said about the Hugos going to shit fiction was true and they have superior tastes. Theres no way tonight could have gone down with out the puppies getting more ammunition.
I mean I do agree personally with what you say about no award. I share Martins view on it, that it was not the best option. Which is why I personally only no awarded when I felt works did not deserve to win.
[–]Ralod 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Why not just remove nominations totally. Make the awards 100% write in. The most popular work wins. Remove No Award totally.
There would have to be a list of works eligible of course, but if every author is competing against the others maybe there will be less of these damaging cliques formed.
[–]ChickenOverlord 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
The no awarding was meant as sending a message that worldcon wont tolerate campaigns for the Hugos.
Yet GRRM himself confirmed that campaigning has been happening for years. It seems to only be an issue now that the "wrong" sort of people are campaigning.
[–]stephencrawford 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
GRRM has many good thoughts on the situation and I enjoyed reading his commentary on the matter leading up to the Hugos. Campaigning is one thing, especially when many voters have not been exposed to an author, etc., but having "slates" to force a skew in results is something totally different. I hope that future slates continue to get smacked down.
[–]Millennium_Dodo 28ポイント29ポイント30ポイント 9時間前 (29子コメント)
Not gonna lie, I enjoyed seeing the puppies get shut out so completely, hopefully this sends a clear message and the same thing doesn't happen again next year. Although it's sad to see some deserving people get caught in the crossfire, so to speak. Hopefully some of the new people who voted this year will continue participating, ideally nominating and voting for the works they consider the best, instead of someone dictating their choices to them. At least that way something good would come out of all the drama this year.
Three Body Problem and Orphan Black were surprises, I expected Dr. Who or perhaps GoT to win and either Ancillary Sword or Goblin Emperor to take home Best Novel. I was rooting for Saga, Rat Queens or Sex Criminals to take the graphic story award, but I guess I should finally check out Ms. Marvel. Congratulations to all the winners!
Now I'm off to make Robert Silverberg singing Hare Krishna my new ringtone.
[–]UnsealedMTG 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
A glance at the statistics show that it was not only a rout throughout the categories, each individual category was pretty overwhelming. As in, the votes for No Award were double the total votes for all individual nominees.
[–]unconundrum[S] 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 9時間前 (7子コメント)
Ms Marvel is aimed at a pretty young audience. My seven-year old niece borrowed my copy. It's really well done, just: aimed young.
[–]devotedpupa 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 9時間前 (1子コメント)
I really liked her interactions with Wolverine.
The only thing I know about that comic is a) New Ms. Marvel is Muslim and b) that one page where she fangirls over Wolverine is hilarious.
[–]Millennium_Dodo 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 9時間前 (4子コメント)
Thanks, I assumed it was more in line with the rest of the Marvel Universe (although I've admittedly only read one or two titles from it, so I'm far from an expert). But I also liked Lumberjanes a lot more than I expected, which I suspect is also not really aimed at me, so we'll see. It seems pretty much universally liked (even before the Hugo), so it deserves a chance.
[–]photonlongsword 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 4時間前 (2子コメント)
Ms. Marvel is really fun and definitely not exclusively readable to young audiences. I'd say it is one of the most thematically complex and interesting books Marvel is publishing (alongside Hawkeye.) Way better than most of the books they put it these days (I read mostly Image these days.)
[–]Millennium_Dodo 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 3時間前 (1子コメント)
I just ordered the first volume! The main reason I never got into the Marvel universe (DC as well), is the history and sheer size of it. As a completionist who ideally reads everything in publication order, going through several decades worth of comics is a somewhat daunting task (not to mention prohibitively expensive). I've tried some acclaimed titles here and there, but not knowing the histories of the characters or missing references tends to annoy me quickly. Also, Image has been soaking up my comics budget lately as well. From what I gather, Ms. Marvel seems to be deliberately intended to capture new readers, so we'll see how that goes.
[–]photonlongsword 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
It is a great way of getting into Marvel as G Willow Wilson has really created her own microcosm within the wider comics universe. I hope you enjoy it!
[–]eean 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Her book Alif the Unseen is pretty fun I thought. It's YAish, but (as someone who doesn't really like YA) not annoyingly so.
[–]Hypercles 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 9時間前 (3子コメント)
hopefully this sends a clear message and the same thing doesn't happen again next yea
If twitter is anything to go by its not. Puppy supporters on twitter are claiming this as a win for the puppies. And Vox Day is already threatening to run a campaign to make sure No Award wins everything next year.
I was slightly sad to see Three Body Problem win, I was hoping it went to Goblin Emperor. But it helps that Three Body Problem was a fantastic read. I wonder if anyone expected Orphan Black to win, thats one that I am looking forward to seeing the stats around.
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
It's really easy to "win" when you bet on all the numbers.
[–]Millennium_Dodo 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 9時間前 (1子コメント)
They would have taken any result as a win, so that's not really unexpected. But judging from the backlash against them, the overall mood at the ceremony and the results themselves, they don't really have as much power as they think they do (I'm also curious about the exact numbers though). For better or worse, people will be more aware of the nomination process next year, so right now I'm cautiously optimistic. Partially because this is pretty much the best result I could have hoped for, partially because I refuse to believe that there are too many people who would willingly associate with people like Day and partially because it's 8:30 AM here and I'm somewhat sleep deprived.
[–]Hypercles 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
Numbers. From a quick look puppy nominees in round one of voting make up about 1500 to 2000 votes (Between nominees). No award in the categories it won, make up about 3500 votes.
Yea I think next year nominations will go better. Day seems to be well into just No Awarding everything. And the Sad Puppies have stated they don't plan on putting a full slate, aiming for more than five nominations in categories, so people will have to pick.
Add to that the hope that more people will actually get around to nominating stuff this year.
[–]Col_Volkov 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 6時間前 (4子コメント)
...hopefully this sends a clear message and the same thing doesn't happen again next year...
What clear message did it send? "It's OK when some authors with loud voices campaign for their works, but not OK if other authors do the same and better"? Because that's all I am getting out of this...
Lots of excellent authors got damaged by this. And the fact that a public vote on something like artistic criticism does not work well just got illustrated amazingly well. Hopefully the public component of the Hugos will be dropped in the future. As it stands, this year is a joke.
[–]Hypercles 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
Hopefully the public component of the Hugos will be dropped in the future
Why? Then how would it be any different than say the Nebula. Also if they drop it, it will stop being a fan award, which is its big thing.
[–]mossmaal 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2時間前 (1子コメント)
"It's OK when some authors with loud voices campaign for their works, but not OK if other authors do the same and better"?
That's not what happened here. They weren't campaigning for their works. They were campaigning for ideology.
This sent a clear message that the Hugo voters reject the kind of hateful anti-inclusive campaign that the puppies tried to run. It shows that the voters reject the kind of bloc voting that was going on. The voters were smart enough to pick up on that.
There's a difference between an author saying "vote for my work" and an author trying to control the entire nomination process.
[–]Col_Volkov -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
No there is not. It's just different scales of campaigning. Especially for a famous author.
[–]Eko_Mister 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 22分前 (0子コメント)
This is what I don't understand. How is Scalzi's political agenda any more tolerable than Sad Puppies?
Why can't we have voting without propaganda from either side?
These authors, most notably Vox Day and Scalzi, are so obnoxious on their blogs and Twitter that I have vowed to never buy or recommend another one of their books. I've never even seen a Day book in person, so it's not a big deal with him, but I used to recommend Old Man's War to a lot of first-time sci fi readers.
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント 7時間前 (10子コメント)
lol puppies quite clearly and publicly weren't in this to win awards, only to prove voting blocs exist, which they did in spades
as of 2015 the Hugos clearly have nothing to do with merit, but for me at least will serve as a handy guide of authors to avoid since I care more about being entertained by great writing and big ideas rather than Correct OpinionsTM
[–]Hypercles 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 7時間前 (8子コメント)
only to prove voting blocs exist, which they did in spades
How? No award as at best a reaction to the puppies actions. The voters of worldcon just were not willing to put up with campaigning on the level the puppies did.
Also you're saying that for example you will ignore say books like the Three Body Problem? Despite Torgersen saying he would have put it on the sad puppy slate if he knew it existed before he complied it, or Vox Day saying it was his favourite of the nominated works.
I think everyone involved in this drama agrees that Three Body Problem got its win on merit. Its silly and doing exactly what you are saying others are doing to ignore all hugo winning works for this year on.
[–]Col_Volkov -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 6時間前 (5子コメント)
Which is why they campaigned on a greater level than the puppies did. Thereby horrendously clearly illustrating that:
(a) campaigning clearly exists, always existed, and damages the awards (this year, to the point of them not being given out),
(b) some authors are allowed to campaign, others are not,
(c) campaigning will happen at a worse level next year.
This was awful. Puppies are hard to respect, sure - but the issue they pointed to was illustrated in spades. The award system needs to change, and the possibility for campaigning has to be removed. As of right now, it's present, and it's the reason for plenty of talented nominees getting shut out.
[–]Hypercles 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 6時間前 (4子コメント)
There was not really anything in the way of campaigning for no award. The closest thing I could see was that puppy free list, which just removed sad puppy nominations from the ballot list.
It was more just an idea floated around by various people and in various blogs.
The closest thing to campaigning that's allowed is the Dr who fandom. But the difference with the dr who fandom is they make up a majority of numbers every year at nomination time. And their campaigning is more fans talking about what episodes they like at Hugo time. That and getting behind fans who make dr who related works - like the chicks dig time lords thingy.
Other than that its at most authors talking about what they like each year at award time or reminding fans about what they wrote in a year. Its gossip and talk more than an organised campaign like the puppies were.
As for next year, who knows. The sad puppies are dropping the whole full slate thing. The rabbids are seeming just going to campaign for no award. Will there be a 'happy kitten' campaign, possibly. I think given the fact that the puppies lost this year it will be unlikely. But if it happens I expect it to suffer a similar fate to the sads.
As for changes, they are in the work. Tomorrow at the business meeting there is a proposal to change how nominations will work. If it passes it limits the power any campaign can have to control the Hugos. It will make the nominations more a run off type system. It will however take a few years to come into effect, if passed.
[–]Col_Volkov 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 6時間前 (3子コメント)
There was not really anything in the way of campaigning for no award.
You are horrendously disconnected from reality if you believe this to be the case. It was very, very clearly coordinated and campaigned for.
Aka campaigned for by various people and various blogs. That's literally how campaigning works.
[–]Hypercles 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 6時間前 (2子コメント)
To me campaigning requires some level of organisation. It needs more than just a lot of people sharing the same view. For example, sad puppies 3 that was pushed and organised by multiple authors (Correia, Torgersen, Hoyt, ect).
A bunch of people all coming to the same conclusion, that the guys who are shouting about how shit the Hugos did the wrong thing, is not as organised enough to be a campaign.
[–]Col_Volkov 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 6時間前 (1子コメント)
Which is exactly how the anti-puppies campaign worked: multiple authors coordinating their fans, via their blogs, to vote No Award. It was highly organized, in exactly the same way puppies campaign was.
A bunch of people all coming to the same conclusion, that the guys who are shouting about how shit the Hugos did the wrong thing, is not as organized enough to be a campaign.
Of course it's organized enough to be a campaign. Pushing fans toward a conclusion, which is exactly what was done, IS campaigning. The individual authors may have arrived to the conclusion independently (and even that's questionable, as one can easily argue - although not prove - that GRRM's authority and history in the field dragged other authors, who otherwise would have remained neutral and would not have expressed a public position, into it), but their fans sure as hell followed their shepherds. Which is the definition of campaigning.
I am actually OK with public votes... but not when authors express public positions on the subject. As it stood, campaigning was a routine component of Hugo, and an important author with a lot of fans saying, on their blog, "Vote for X", DID constitute campaigning... then, when puppies came and did it better, the same authors that have been doing it for years cried foul.
And that's bullshit. If there is a public vote, campaigning is bound to happen. So there shouldn't be a public component to it - or, what we observed, is a logical conclusion.
[–]Hypercles 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
Which authors? I know there is the puppy free slate website that has been floating around. And I think an editor associated with Tor (Maybe TNH or PHN) said no award was not a dumb idea. But the big authors who have weighed in on the puppy drama (Flint, Martin and Scalzi) have not been supporting the no award everything.
Martin, was not pushing no award. If you had read any of his blogs on this, you would know he has been vocally against no awarding everything.
But the puppies did something different to what was normally done. Lets say I agree with you, that something like Scalzi's pimpage posts are campaigning. Previous campaigns have a) never been to the same scale as the sad puppies and b) never been as successful.
I think if Scalzi had in the past come out with a 'recommendation list' that comprised of the majority of categories and never discussed the nominated work. And then that list became the Hugo ballot, the outrage would have been the same and it would have been no awarded.
There is a difference to an author talking up what they like occasionally, and campaigning. I mean for example here's Martins recommendations for the 2013 Hugos.
http://grrm.livejournal.com/262170.html
Leviathan Wakes, The Wise Man Fears and 11/22/63 make up his recommendations.
http://www.thehugoawards.org/hugo-history/2013-hugo-awards/
Not one of those stories made it to the Hugos that year. Despite Martin being the biggest author in the industry at the moment. Him recommending something does not have that much of an impact on things.
Sure campaign will happen. But the voting electorate can also take a stand against that campaigning when it happens. As we saw this year.
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 7時間前 (1子コメント)
How?
the voting data has been released, go take a look
[–]Hypercles 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
I did, I was the one that posted it to this thread. It just proves the majority of fans did not like the tactics used by the puppies.
[–]Indenturedsavant 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
since I care more about being entertained by great writing and big ideas rather than Correct OpinionsTM
Which is exactly what Three Body Problem is... It's sad that you have let yourself be so easily manipulated because it's going to prevent you from reading some extraordinary stories but then again you're only hurting yourself lol
[–]benpeek 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 5時間前 (2子コメント)
Interesting.
I think, from the stats, that we can argue that the SP/RP stance that they are a large, unspoken collection of people who are not being represented in the genre is not likely true. It took but three hundred votes to get a nomination, but it took two to three thousand to win, suggesting a larger element of the genre who are happy with its direction.
I'm sure there will be a lot of arguing over it, and a lot of different views put forward, but that's perhaps the most interesting take of it for me.
[–]Ralod 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
I don't think this year is really an accurate measure. A lot of people went out of their way to vote this year, many who never would have considered doing so in the past. I love to see the numbers on first time voters this year.
This years numbers are going to be massively skewed due to the controversy. I don't think you should be drawing those conclusions from these results alone.
[–]benpeek 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 50分前 (0子コメント)
I think you can, for exactly the controversy. This was a year where both sides of the SF culture war got up and voted and made noise. I think it's reasonable to reach the conclusion, though I am sure you can reach a more nuanced one through bringing together all the years - but as a blunt tool and as a statement, it said what it said.
(Remember, for the SP/RP side, it was meant to be a statement about taking SF back to its roots.)
[–]DavisAshura 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
I'll have to check out the work of this 'NO AWARD' writer. Sounds awesome, but probably not as good as my personal favorite, 'SIMULTANEOUS DISQUALIFICATION'.
[–]Ketomatic 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 9時間前* (12子コメント)
The Nuclear option won. Happy the puppies lost overall (they are so whiny) but you can't argue that these awards were all handed out (or not handed out) entirely on merit. I really think there will need to be some rule changes going forward, and I have no idea what they should be. Good luck con people!
The ustream chat was a good laugh, and for an awkward gathering of SF/F nerds, the show was pretty good! CHUCHU, Connie and the Austrian(?) fan-presenter were the standouts for sure.
[–]relentlessreadingWorldbuilders 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Connie killed! I was disappointed when she said she wasn't going to present, I was so happy to see her on stage tonight.
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10ポイント-9ポイント-8ポイント 7時間前 (10子コメント)
you can't argue that these awards were all handed out (or not handed out) entirely on merit.
this is what the puppies quite clearly and publicly said they wanted to accomplish, not win awards from a worthless rigged game
[–]Hypercles 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 7時間前 (9子コメント)
Yea they said that, but then they rigged the awards so only their nominees appear for most categories.
That annoyed people and something that many people thought was wrong. Which is why they no awarded puppy nominees as a blanket, we won't put up with you pushing your politics and message into the hugos.
Personally I disagreed with that strategy, but still ended up no awarding categories like Novella, just due to nothing being award worthy. Or just not voting in categories like editor as I have no reference to tell how good of an editor each was.
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 7時間前 (7子コメント)
well, describe another way they could have accomplished what they set out to do without voting for people considered politically undesirable by the Tor bloc
[–]Hypercles 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 7時間前 (6子コメント)
lol Tor bloc. I wish people would stop with that nonsense. I mean Tor hasn't needed to rig the Hugos to get wins. Well unless you think Vinge (3) and Card (2) did not win their awards on merit. And those two others make up the majority of Tors wins.
They could have just asked people to vote for what they thought was the best book of the year. Reminding people that the Hugos was a fan voted award. They did not have to create a slate, or bring in all the 'affirmative action' and 'liberal message fiction' arguments.
[–]Bergmaniac 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 6時間前 (1子コメント)
The Tor bloc is one of the dumbest thing the Puppies has come up with. Tor is by far the biggest publisher in SFF and has a very large portion of the most popular writers in the genre publishing with them (Card, Jordan, Sanderson, Vinge, etc, etc). Tor.com pays the best rates for short fiction in SFF and employs some of the best editors (Ellen Datlow for example), and you can read the stories for free. So they win and get nominated quite often. Nothing is more normal than that.
What's dumber, is they are not the most successful publisher at the Hugos. Well they are for best Novel. But Asimov's Science Fiction and Fantasy has historically (from the early 80s to the early 2000s) dominated the best editor and all the shorter fiction categories.
Also one of the puppy nominated works was published by Tor, and John C Wright one of the most vocal puppy authors, has all his novels published by Tor.
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-21ポイント-20ポイント-19ポイント 6時間前 (3子コメント)
lol Tor bloc
it doesn't matter what you call it, but tonight it was proved it exists and it controls the Hugos totally, giving lie to the "fan voted award" conceit
[–]Hypercles 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント 6時間前 (2子コメント)
How does it prove it exists. No award was a reaction to the puppies campaign. Its still a fan voted award. It just so happens the puppies did not have as many fans as they thought.
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-21ポイント-20ポイント-19ポイント 6時間前 (1子コメント)
go see the voting data
I see downvotes have triggered the 10 minute timer, I'll take my wrongthink elsewhere
[–]Hypercles 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
I did see the data. The puppies just did not have the numbers. Most fans decided that they would not support the puppies tactics this year.
[+]Celestaria スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
Their strategy worked too well. If you're asked to choose between a, A, a, b, and a but a's aren't your cup of tea, you're essentially only getting 1 choice. Even if 70 % of the voters like a's, b might end up winning because 70/4 is less than 30/1.
[–]Daemon_Targaryen 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 9時間前 (2子コメント)
I've never heard of the winner for best novel :/
[–]unconundrum[S] 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
It's the first translated work to win best novel.
[–]Hypercles 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Its a good work of scifi. I liked Goblin Emperor more personally. But Three Body Problem was still an awesome book that's well worth the read.
Its also as unconundrum said, a work that originally was written in chinese. Its author being one of the biggest writers of Scifi in China.
[–]Jeakel 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
Personally I don't pay a lot of attention to the Hugos nor much attention to the brouhala about the "Puppies"...
I vote with my wallet for the authors I like and want to read, I'm pretty sure those authors sincerely appreciate all the 'voters' like me.
[–]fiif 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 6時間前 (4子コメント)
Can I get a Til on puppies, I assume some super intelligent dogs aren't trying to stage a coup d'état on the awards?
[–]Hypercles 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 5時間前 (3子コメント)
A group of mostly conservative authors, felt that the Hugo awards had become an award given out to books with the right message or for affirmative action reasons. They believe this has been the case going back ten, twenty years. Despite two of the authors involved Correia (who started it) and Torgersen (who ran it this year) getting nominations for the Hugo (and campbell award).
They in a move to counter this 'right message clique' created a slate and campaigned to get all the works on it nominated for the Hugo. They succeed.
This upset people who did not see an issue with the Hugos (those who run the award, nominated for it and vote for it) and upset people who did not like the campaigning for the award.
In the end there attempt to dictate who won the award failed. With worldcon telling everyone that it will not support organised campaigning for the award.
[–]fiif 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 5時間前 (2子コメント)
Ty for the answer.:)
[–]Fistocracy 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
For a bit of extra depth, what Hypercles described was just the Sad Puppies, who've been doing this for a couple of years now without much success.
What made this year different is that a much more outspoken author called Theodore Beale started a second group called the Rabid Puppies, and he drew on his own fanbase within the Gamergate and Neoreactionary communities to organize some bloc voting instead of just talking about it.
And where the Sad Puppies are just a bit bitter and a bit conservative, Beale is a lot bitter and a lot... well, conservative isn't really the right term. What do you call someone who thinks democracy is a mistake, black people are inferior, and womens' education should be banned because it leads to social decay? Because that's where the guy who runs the Rabid Puppies is coming from.
[–]KristaDBallAMA Author Krista D. Ball 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 5分前 (0子コメント)
But I thought it was about ethics in Hugo voting? /s
[–]the_bewildered_beast 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Saga should have won for graphic novel!
Stayed up last night watching the live stream and following Twitter. It was quite enjoyable to see what happened and it couldn't have gone any better for the future of the Hugo Awards, in my opinion. Not that it is preferable to have 5 No Awards, but it shows that slates are not going to be viewed kindly, especially if the works in those slates are not considered in the league to be award-winning. Was disappointing to see those that were on edge of being nominated getting left out, but that's the luck of this year. Hopefully the large amount of No Award votes means we'll have more people nominating next year and Puppy slates will be an afterthought. Will be interesting to see if the Rabids can build enough of a following to go scorched-earth. Hard to imagine anyone wanting to dedicate the time to follow Vox Day down into his cavern of miserableness just to destroy the Hugos.
Also, I don't really think anyone should consider Guardians of the Galaxy a Puppy win. That was a movie for all of us to enjoy. Not once did I ever relate the two.
Adding "Three Body Problem" to my TBR list. Enjoyed Ken Liu's acceptance speech and humbleness. Also, Wes Chu cracked me up in his acceptance speech for the Campbell! Congrats to all! Seems like the Hugos are going to be stronger than ever now.
π Rendered by PID 11526 on app-106 at 2015-08-23 15:28:33.029899+00:00 running ce2b5b1 country code: JP.
[–]undo-undo-undo 57ポイント58ポイント59ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]unconundrum[S] 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]KristaDBallAMA Author Krista D. Ball 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]shadowsong42 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]wardsalud 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]KristaDBallAMA Author Krista D. Ball 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Ankari 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]gailosaurus 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Ankari 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ChickenOverlord 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]gailosaurus 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Lanodantheon 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]KristaDBallAMA Author Krista D. Ball 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]unconundrum[S] 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]ydeliane 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]deathtotheemperor 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Jota-Pe 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ydeliane 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Eko_Mister 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 26ポイント27ポイント28ポイント (22子コメント)
[–]devotedpupa 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 21ポイント22ポイント23ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]devotedpupa 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]klyberess 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]7Pedazos 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]jeremyteg 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]relentlessreadingWorldbuilders 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]jeremyteg 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Gamethyme 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]devotedpupa 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]7Pedazos 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]jeremyteg 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]eean 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MattieShoes 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]unconundrum[S] 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]photonlongsword 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]csuzw 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]EltaninAntenna 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]photonlongsword 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]gmrm4n 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Lanodantheon 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント (53子コメント)
[–]SecondaryHammerSmith 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]Lanodantheon 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]SecondaryHammerSmith 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]eean 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]mallamp_ 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]EltaninAntenna -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]relentlessreadingWorldbuilders 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Koppenberg 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]relentlessreadingWorldbuilders 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Koppenberg -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]devotedpupa 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Tekomandor 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]eean 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]eean 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Hypercles -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]eean 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Temptime19 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Lanodantheon 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Fistocracy 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bazhip 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (29子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]unconundrum[S] 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]devotedpupa 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]unconundrum[S] 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]relentlessreadingWorldbuilders 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]chonggo 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]chonggo 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]chonggo 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]GetMeOffReddit スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11ポイント-10ポイント-9ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]MaesterCat 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]MaesterCat 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]GetMeOffReddit 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Ketomatic 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (9子コメント)
[+]GetMeOffReddit スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]GetMeOffReddit -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]MaesterCat 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]shhhhquiet 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]flickering_truth 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (3子コメント)
[+]GetMeOffReddit スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]TheManWithNoHair 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]flickering_truth 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]blalien -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheManWithNoHair 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheManWithNoHair 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]stephencrawford 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]shhhhquiet 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]TheManWithNoHair 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]shhhhquiet 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]TheManWithNoHair 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Ralod 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ChickenOverlord 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]stephencrawford 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Millennium_Dodo 28ポイント29ポイント30ポイント (29子コメント)
[–]UnsealedMTG 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]unconundrum[S] 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]devotedpupa 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]gmrm4n 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Millennium_Dodo 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]photonlongsword 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Millennium_Dodo 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]photonlongsword 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]eean 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]DjangoWexlerAMA Author Django Wexler 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Millennium_Dodo 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Col_Volkov 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]mossmaal 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Col_Volkov -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Eko_Mister 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Col_Volkov -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Col_Volkov 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Col_Volkov 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Indenturedsavant 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]benpeek 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Ralod 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]benpeek 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]DavisAshura 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Ketomatic 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]relentlessreadingWorldbuilders 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10ポイント-9ポイント-8ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (9子コメント)
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Bergmaniac 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-21ポイント-20ポイント-19ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント (2子コメント)
[+]urection スコアが基準値未満のコメント-21ポイント-20ポイント-19ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Celestaria スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Daemon_Targaryen 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]unconundrum[S] 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Jeakel 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]fiif 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Hypercles 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]fiif 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Fistocracy 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]KristaDBallAMA Author Krista D. Ball 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]the_bewildered_beast 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]stephencrawford 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)