あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]MeanOfPhidias 2ポイント3ポイント  (9子コメント)

It absolutely does not. Your point was that the community supports neither.

The community has been pushing for the raise in block size. The fork would be accepted. The technical lift is apples to apples. The community support is apples to oranges.

[–]dyzo-blue -2ポイント-1ポイント  (7子コメント)

The community has been pushing for the raise in block size.

When did Mircea Popescu cease to be part of the community?

http://trilema.com/2014/usgavin-the-lolcow/

[–]MeanOfPhidias 1ポイント2ポイント  (6子コメント)

I'm not going to pick through some link. Make your point yourself.

[–]dyzo-blue -2ポイント-1ポイント  (5子コメント)

Your claim was that the community is pushing for a change in the block size.

I proved your claim was wrong by linking to a prominent part of the community stating that he is 100% against a change in the block size.

What part of my refutation of your claim is confusing to you?

[–]MeanOfPhidias 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

You're putting Mircea Popescu up as 'the community?' Because the question was not about his opinion or you finding a part of the community that does not disagree. Or because Andresen is actively developing it? Because not every member of the community runs an exchange and securities market and shares the motivations of Popescu?

I don't know his argument. The faintest reasoning I recall from this irrelevant crack pot is letting economics dictate the cost of block real estate. It's your job to make the point. Not to point to someone you recognize as an authority like some kind of small child.

Do you need me to use smaller words?

[–]dyzo-blue -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

You're putting Mircea Popescu up as 'the community?'

No, I'm naming Mircea as a prominent spokesperson for a large enough segment of the bitcoin community that his very existence refutes your claim that the entire community is in favor of increasing the block size.

Or because Andresen is actively developing it?

How long do you think his development will continue after the Bitcoin Foundation goes under?

I don't know his argument.

His argument, itself, doesn't matter a lick. What matters is that he is representative of a segment of the community that will fight tooth and nail against an increase in the block size.

Their existence is an inconvenient truth, which proves the argument that increasing the block size will be trivial is utter bullocks. Not only is increasing the block size not trivial, it isn't going to happen. Mircea and his crew will prevent it. They have made that perfectly clear.

[–]MeanOfPhidias 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'm naming Mircea as a prominent spokesperson for a large enough segment of the bitcoin community

He represents no segment of the community?

How long do you think his development will continue after the Bitcoin Foundation goes under?

I think he's been working on Bitcoin for about three times as long as the Foundation has been in existence. Probably until he finds a more interesting hobby? It's not charity that he works on Bitcoin and it's not for me to tell you his whims.

Be an adult and ask him yourself if you care. It has no point.

What matters is that he is representative of a segment of the community that will fight tooth and nail against an increase in the block size.

Substantiate any of that.

Their existence is an inconvenient truth,

Who?

which proves the argument that increasing the block size will be trivial is utter bullocks.

No? It doesn't.

Not only is increasing the block size not trivial, it isn't going to happen. Mircea and his crew will prevent it. They have made that perfectly clear.

Yeah, I'll go get my tinfoil hat. I'm this will make sense after a few hours of stewing in the microwave.

[–]dyzo-blue -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

Cool. Everyone who argues that increasing the block size will be an easy and in fact trivial task, can prove that I'm wrong in arguing that it will be a difficult, if not impossible, task, by simply increasing the block size.

Let me know when this supposedly easy-to-do thing takes place. Thanks.