/gamergatehq/ - #GamerGate and #NotYourShield

So he opposes harassment of individuals regardless of whether they're transgender or not, yet somehow he's a harasser because he has some differing opinions on things?

Guess this is what a cult does to a person.

>>257247

Well said anon.

Though I think OP meant well, since this is about a hitpiece with an archive provided. Still, fuck this focus on TB we've been having lately, he doesn't have to be pro-GG, and if he considers pro-GG he doesn't have to be 100% for all the goals we had. Few of us even are 100% committed. Any well meant help is welcome.

Totalbiscut is a flip flopper, he doesn't give a shit about ethics when it hurts him or his terrible rotten friends who will ruin an innocent man's life for shits and giggles.

Don't give him attention.

>>257258

Totalbiscut considers himself a journalist when convenient and he is corrupt, clearly favoring his friends (who, again, tried to ruin an innocent man's life for attention) and doing massively unethical things for them (ban/censor/block anyone who dares disagree). He shouldn't be excused because he pays us lip service.

Having an opinion about transgender science is not the same as believing people shouldn't be harassed for doing something you might believe is not right.

He's been morally consistent since day one and this is not a flip flop.

>>257276

>censorship is wrong

>but i'll censor anyone who dares say stuff about my friends (and no on else)

>consistent

John Bain is a corrupt journalist, stop thinking otherwise.

I don't even get why this is an issue, GG isn't inherently anti-trans. A large amount of people on 8chan believe being trans is a mental illness, but that isn't some core tenant of GG. If TB was to ban all discussion around it on his videos and in any place of discussion he had control of I could see it being a related issue but as far as I know that's not the case.

>>257279

Are you one of those people who believe that censorship is any time someone tells a person what they're saying is not appropriate? Because it really isn't. I don't see him actively seeking out people to brigade on, just the people who were harassing one of his guests.

Anyone have the image of him and dying orangutan?

>>257281

Weren't we like… against censorship? The guy is banning people on his subreddit for misgendering ffs. He also banned someone from his youtube channel because he said "not more of this feminism shit". AND he supported Intel's diversity bullshit. The guy is an SJW, he is just smarter than the rest of them.

>>257279

>TB is a corrupt journalist

I'm going to be that twat, [Citations needed]

You want me to condemn a man for defending his business you're going to have to show me the corruption, the ethics breaches and the COIs. Please, if you are correct then you must have the evidence to back it up. Assume I'm simply ignorant of it and bring it to my attention.

You don't have to agree with him on everything, I sure don't, but calling him corrupt because you don't like him in the hope people agree with you makes you no better than the SJWs.

>>257236

You are a moron

>>257263

>>257268

>>257279

So much salt.

>>257288

It's his subreddit and he doesn't have the market power to quell your speech outside of it. So, no, I really don't care that he banned you.

You're going to give us your address so we can come over and freely express ourselves without the fear of censorship, aren't you, Leader?

John Bain is a shitlib faggot and always has been. The rest of socjus turned against him because he's wasn't pure evil like them and their monstrous ideology. So it makes sense that he's kissing their asses now to try to avoid accusations of heresy.

"phobic"

>>257296

First of all, I never used his subreddit, I'm talking about him banning anyone who "misgendered" his guest. How is what he did different than NeoFag or other sites banning discussion on GG? Also, do you think it's ok for him to disable youtube comments? If yes, do you think it's ok for Anita to disable youtube comments?

>>257279

>TB is a journalist

You're literally retarded. Like him or not he is not a journalist and as far as I know he's never claimed to be.

>>257263

Nigga i've tracked you across three different boards and you fucking NEVER

POST PROOF

OF WHAT YOU'RE CLAIMING

show me his roten friends ruining an innocent man's life

>>257312

Don't bother, anon. This is the same shit some faggot was doing a little while ago with Sargon. They'd make claims of them doing something wrong but never providing evidence. Same shit, different day and target. You know how these people are, "no bad tactics."

>>257258

>>257247

I posted this mainly because im sure gamerev is on a GG support list

>>257302

I think it's acceptable for all of them to weed their own gardens. I have no expectation of being able to dictate Anita's YouTube settings.

>>257317

If that is the case then it is probably the "COINTELPRO"fags.

>>257312

Why don't you look up what he falsely claimed about Fraser Millward yourself?

>>257310

https://archive.is/Qm6JU

Even if he never had, it's still the same shit as claiming your a "blogger" so you can be as unethical as possible. It doesn't work that way.

>>257312

Here. Let me spoonfeed your ass

https://archive.is/CQXBk

>It has now been made clear that Fraser did not refer to Laura as an 'it' or a 'thing' or a 'he', and these claims have now been fully retracted by Laura and she is sorry for the hurt this caused

>>257351

>Fraser caused offence to Laura on stage when he publicly misgendered her by addressing her as 'this person'. Laura was also upset by statements which she saw as suggesting that she was not female. Fraser is sorry he said this, and for the pain he inadvertently caused Laura.

So he admits to making non-specified comments that triggered le transmeme in their joint statement.

I have been unable to find any interviews of witnesses, but plenty of copy pasta of this story.

>>257351

But referring to transfags as "he" is the morally and intellectually correct thing to do.

>>257365

Read the line quoted. He only refereed to the cutter as "this person" (which the presenter did to avoid offensive because he couldn't know if "laura" was actually mentally ill or just a shitty cosplayer and used gender neutral language) while "Laura" lied and claimed the presenter called him "it".

>>257376

>Laura was also upset by statements which she saw as suggesting that she was not female.

Stop selectively reading.

>>257379

Irrelevant. "Laura" was never called "it", but claimed he was (though from his actions he's clearly enough of subhuman garbage to be called that)

It's funny how you cucks are all about freedom of expression and anti censorship until some mentally ill or desperately socially parasitic dude comes along and demands that you treat him like a woman.

Don't you faggots get it? Trannies have become the SJW trump card that succeeds in making you fold your hand.

>>257380

It isn't irrelevant. Fraser says unspecified things that Laura misunderstood as the laundry list of words that are retracted. You accept the joint statement in total to obtain the retraction or you reject it in yoysl, and with it the retraction.

Why aren't you annoyed that you can't tell what he actually said so that you can judge the level of scrutiny warranted or that no one apparently bothered to ask anyone else what happened?

>though from his actions he's clearly enough of subhuman garbage to be called that

If you decide to do that, then don't be surprised when a trans reporter tells their audience that you called them "it" and those people make fun of you.