8
9

7 differences between 0 and nothing (philosophyplus1.blogspot.com)

Intophilosophy が 投稿

全 38 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]possibly-necessaryPhD in pizza trisection 11ポイント12ポイント  (9子コメント)

I'd like to point out that /u/Intophilosophy himself is the author of the linked article.

[–]gwtkof 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's in the right subreddit ironically.

[–]WaytfmModerately Ineffable 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

I gave the goat guy a goat flair, so I'll also give this guy a special flair, so we can better recognize them.

[–]Intophilosophy[S] -5ポイント-4ポイント  (3子コメント)

😂😂😂 - I know my my motives. - You dont even know my race. - I came up with that joke and thought hay ...... - I removed it and is now instead in mean jokes - What does that have to do with this post in this sub???

[–]WaytfmModerately Ineffable 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Wrong comment to reply to. The comment where I pointed out the racist joke is a different one.

[–]Intophilosophy[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

A person who believes in beaing logical can not be racist because it would be highly illogical as everything we have is because of chance. Starting from the way we look, think, act, moral strengths, weaknesses etc. Because we had nothing to do with it even if it may seem different at times.

It would be illogical to be proud of or think less of another because of one's or the other's chance.

But Im just saying.

[–]With_a_G 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You don't know his race, and he "thought hay"...

His race is "horse."

[–]WaytfmModerately Ineffable 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Look at all of their excellent contributions to reddit.

[–]Elcyc 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't understand. Is he being self ironic or why is he linking his own article here?

[–]ExomniumA ∧ ¬A ⊢ 💣 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

>'nothing' can't be conceptualized.

>Writes a blog post about it

[–]arnet95∞ = i 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nothing does not and can not be defined since it does not exist.

They said, right after linking to a definition of nothing on Wikipedia.

[–]Intophilosophy[S] -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is the op's quoting wikipidea suppose to be a counter argument?

Ok. Now I see clearly that the logic was wrong all along. Thanks for the insight.

[–]GodelsVortex 3ポイント4ポイント  (7子コメント)

Numbers aren't real becuase they don't have wavefunctions.

Here's an archived version of the linked post.

[–]Intophilosophy[S] -4ポイント-3ポイント  (6子コメント)

A number is a mathematical object used to count,measure and label. The original examples are thenatural numbers1,2,3, and so forth. wikipidea.

But yah. Ther are naturally ideological.

[–]gwtkof 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's a bot that quotes the best lines used in older posts

[–]WaytfmModerately Ineffable 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Did you just cite wikipedia by literally only saying the word, wikipedia?

[–]down2a9 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, he cited wikipedia by literally only saying the word "wikipidea".

[–]GodelsVortex 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

But do they have wavefunctions? Real things have wavefunctions.

[–]Intophilosophy[S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Numbers are naturaly ideological. Dont you think so?

[–]edderiofer 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What the fuck do you mean by "naturaly[sic] ideological"?

[–]CatBernd 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Head over to /r/sql and ask them the difference between 0 and NULL :)

[–]shortbitcoin 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you rephrase the statements it starts to resemble a Who's-on-First routine:

• Nothing is undefinable.

• Nothing is unimaginable.

• Nothing is incomprehensible.

• Nothing is unmeasurable.

[–]ttumblrbots 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

SnapShots: 1, 2, 3 [huh?]

doooooogs: 1, 2 (seizure warning); 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; if i miss a post please PM me

[–]Intophilosophy[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

I dont understand why all the downvotes?

[–]junkmail22infinitely effable 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Because your mathematics are really bad and you write poorly and you're kinda racist.

[–]WaytfmModerately Ineffable 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Hey, you don't know his motives. You don't even know what race he is. It's unfair of you to call him racist for calling black people and monkeys cousins.

[–]Intophilosophy[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes black people are related to monkeys. Atleast according to the evidence that is available to me at this time.

But so are white people. So is all human race. Why can't we just chill and let a joke be a joke. The white biologist would say the same if that is how people normaly greet eachother in a white neighborhood and the joke would still be the same as most biologists believe in evolution. Cant we see it from that angle.

You know what, it just shows how narrow mnded the interpreter is. Relax. I am of a race that is at the recieving end of racism. Im still making jokes about it. Infact many comedians do the same.

[–]junkmail22infinitely effable 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

All mathematics aside, this guy's gratuitous use of that emoji is frustrating.

[–]Intophilosophy[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

There isnt even one reasonable argument that incountered. I am really laughing now cause u dont even know my race. Do I have to post a pic or something?

[–]WaytfmModerately Ineffable 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you're going to post overly defensive comments about your racism, at least attach them to comments that call you out for being racist.

[–]TotesMessenger 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)

[–]edderiofer 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

So... all seven arguments boil down to the following:

"0 exists. "nothing" does not exist. Therefore "0" and "nothing" are different."

By which I mean that if this argument were false, then your claim would be completely baseless.

However, contrary to your argument, "nothing" exists as a word. Therefore, the two are one and the same, and your claim is completely baseless.