use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
171 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
reddit.nfo (smbc-comics.com)
pompouspug が 4時間前 投稿
[–]MrWeiner 99ポイント100ポイント101ポイント 3時間前 (43子コメント)
Thanks for using my comic. Here's it's home: http://smbc-comics.com/index.php?id=1067
[–]natalia___ 50ポイント51ポイント52ポイント 3時間前 (4子コメント)
This is one of those instances where I'm really happy to use reddit, flaws and all, because I have a chance to directly communicate with a person I admire. I'm a huge fan of your work; as a longtime reader, your commitment to diversity in your comics is some of the most seamless I've ever seen, and I fully believe it does a great deal to normalize representations of marginalized groups while telling relatable and smart jokes. Thanks for contributing a net good to society.
[–]Maxnwil 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 43分前 (1子コメント)
For real, I always use SMBC as a counterpoint when people say "well if we included a black man, it would be obvious that he's there only because he's black"
SMBC has such a flawlessly diverse cast and I'm so happy about it. Keep doing what you're doing, sir.
[–]natalia___ 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 16分前 (0子コメント)
Same with gay characters. I don't check the comic as often as I used to, but I've never seen anything where a character seems out of place due to an immutable characteristic like that. There's a real talent and deliberate skill to creating the sort of consistent environment of a lowkey equality utopia in the comics.
[–]Aethe 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 47分前 (0子コメント)
Bruh
Just kidding, I agree.
[–]Deimorz 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 7分前 (0子コメント)
This is one of those instances where I'm really happy to use reddit, flaws and all, because I have a chance to directly communicate with a person I admire.
Zach's (MrWeiner's) brother Marty is actually reddit's new CTO: https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/3hgni3/reddit_names_marty_weiner_founding_engineer_at/
So he's like reddit's uncle or something now, I don't really know how this works.
[–]pompouspug[S] 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント 3時間前 (1子コメント)
Hey, you're a cool person who makes cool comics.
I linked the direct image link for people who use RES. I'll keep in mind to add the home link next time, too. :)
[–]WorseThanHipster 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
🔔 🔔 🔔
[–]Suddenly_Elmo 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 3時間前 (34子コメント)
I enjoy your comics apart from the ones that poke fun at philosophy. I cannot take a joke
[–]natalia___ 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 3時間前 (8子コメント)
The ones that satirize nihilism hit hard :'(
[–]Suddenly_Elmo 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 3時間前 (5子コメント)
for me it was the one that has mathematicians, physicists etc "solve" philosophical problems (trolley problem, Mary's room etc) with a bit of lateral thinking and "common sense". It got me so mad
[–]Thesket 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント 2時間前 (4子コメント)
I thought those were satirising scientists who think they can solve philosophical problems?
[–]Suddenly_Elmo 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 2時間前 (2子コメント)
I am overly defensive and paranoid
[–]MrWeiner 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 2時間前 (1子コメント)
Pet theory: Defensiveness corresponds to local respect/affluence.
Economists and engineers love being mocked.
Every time I make fun of humanities, some fragile soul is affronted.
And I have a goddamn Literature BA, and you can all suck it.
[–]azmyth 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間前 (0子コメント)
As an economist, I can confirm.
[–]MrWeiner 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
Seriously, I thought it was obvious. I mean, look at the Gettier problem one.
[–]WorseThanHipster 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2時間前 (1子コメント)
They are usually nihilist straw men tho. I've subscribed to pretty hardcore nihilism moral, epistemological, existential, for a long time now, and I never say or think 99% of the stuff everyone else seems to associates with nihilism.
It doesn't exactly provide a lot of utility, but that's not the point of philosophy, is it?
[–]natalia___ 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
It doesn't matter anyway
[+]mEsjycCxNe8y7x スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 2時間前* (24子コメント)
His comics are pretty good, except for the ones that delve into durr hurr STEM is the only valuable pursuit humanities in schools are garbage
[–]MrWeiner 36ポイント37ポイント38ポイント 1時間前 (23子コメント)
Seriously, where the fuck are you getting this? I'm a goddamn Lit BA, and I wish the people in my community had some pride. The book I've most recommended this year is Beryl Markham's "West With the Night." Here's my, clearly humanities-hating, reading list for 2015:
Jan 1 - The Wal-Mart Effect (Fishman)
Jan 7 - The Island at the Center of the World (Shorto)
Jan 8 - The Iron Heel (London)
Jan 9 - The Splendid Outcast (Markham)
Jan 10 - Now I know (Lewis)
Jan 11 - The Copernicus Complex (Scharf)
Jan 12 - The Wonderful Visit (Wells)
Jan 13 - Lord Jim (Conrad)
Jan 14 - The Tao is Silent (Smullyan)
Jan 15 - The Island of Doctor Moreau (Wells)
Jan 16 - The Devil in the White City (Larson)
Jan 19 - The Swiss Family Robinson (Wyss)
Jan 21 - Robin Hanson Manuscript(Hanson)
Jan 21 - A Children’s Garden of Verses (Stevenson)
Jan 22 - Johnny Got His Gun (Trumbo)
Jan 23 - Mars Curiosity Rover (Manning, Simon)
Jan 25 - Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl (Jacobs)
Jan 26 - Ernest Hemingway Selected Letters 1917-1961 (Ed. Baker)
Jan 27 - Mathematics and Humor (Paulos)
Jan 31 - The Rush (Dolnick)
Feb 1 - The Perfect Storm (Junger)
Feb 2 - The Wizards Stay Up Late (Hafner, Lyon)
Feb 3 - Geek Physics (Allain)
Feb 4 - Rocketship Galileo (Heinlein)
Feb 7 - Heidi (Spyri)
Feb 9 - The Life and Times of Po Chu-I (Trans. Waley)
Feb 9 - My Early Life (Churchill)
Feb 14 - The Beak of the Finch (Weiner)
Feb 16 - Space Cadet (Heinlein)
Feb 18 - What the Dormouse Said (Markoff)
Feb 19 - The Bolter (Osborne)
Feb 20 - What Should We Be Worried About? (Ed. Brockman)
Feb 23 - The Story of My Life (Keller)
Feb 26 - Destined to Witness (Massaquoi)
Feb 26 - The New Jim Crow (Alexander)
Feb 28 - Tales of Soldiers and Civilians, and Other Stories (Bierce)
Mar 1 - In Defense of Flogging (Moskos)
Mar 2 - Red Planet (Heinlein)
Mar 8 - The British Sailor (Kemp)
Mar 9 - Political Order and Political Decay (Fukuyama)
Mar 17 - The Son Also Rises (Clarke)
Mar 18 - Between Planets (Heinlein)
Mar 20 - Consider the Fork (Wilson)
Mar 26 - The Wrong Stuff (Smith)
Mar 27 - The Puppet Masters (Heinlein)
Mar 27 - Huck’s Raft (Mintz)
Mar 28 - The Knowledge (Dartnell)
Mar 29 - Escape from Sobibor (Rashke)
April 3 - The Island of Reality (Gleiser)
April 5 - The Rolling Stones (Heinlein)
April 8 - Dead Wake (Larson)
April 8 - Lost Prophet, The Life and Times of Bayard Rustin (D’Emilio)
April 10 - The Residence (Brower)
April 12 - Ironweed (Kennedy)
April 13 - Dr. Tatiana’s Sex Advice to All Creation (Judson)
April 14 - Skeletons on the Zahara (King)
April 15 - Starman Jones (Heinlein)
April 16 - The Personalized Medicine Revolution (Cullis)
April 20 - The Philadelphia Chromosome (Wapner)
April 21 - The Starbeast (Heinlein)
April 22 - Mission to Mars (Aldrin)
April 25 - The Language of Life (Collins)
April 27 - Tunnel in the Sky (Heinlein)
April 28 - Asteroid Mining 101 (Lewis)
May 1 - Chinese Poems (trans. Waley)
May 2 - Thinking, Fast and Slow (Kahnemann)
May 3 - Uncommon Carrier (McPhee)
May 6 - Double Star (Heinlein)
May 9 - The Wright Brothers (McCullough)
May 12 - Waterloo (Cornwall)
May 19 - Reagan (Brands)
May 19 - The Selected Poems of T’ao Ch’ien (Trans. Hinton)
May 21 - Time for the Stars (Heinlein)
May 22 - The Arsenal of Democracy (Berkrot)
May 22 - The Wilderness World of John Muir (ed. Teale)
May 25 - The Door Into Summer (Heinlein)
May 27 - Philosophy of Law (Marmor)
May 28 - Have Space Suit - Will Travel (Heinlein)
May 29 - Buried in the Sky (Zuckerman, Padoan)
June 5 - The Autobiography of GK Chesterton
June 11 - Letters from a Stoic (Seneca)
June 20 - Action Philosophers (Van Lente, Dunlavey)
June 20 - The Power Broker (Caro)
June 25 - Podkayne of Mars (Heinlein)
June 30 - Logicomix (Doxiadis, Papadimitrou)
July 1 - Goebbels: A Biography (Longerich)
July 3 - Glory Road (Heinlein)
July 7 - Project Plowshare (Kaufman)
July 13 - The Red Flag (Priestland)
July 13 - The Railway Children (Nesbit)
July 14 - The Shepherd’s Life (Rebanks)
July 15 - Farnham’s Freehold (Heinlein)
July 15 - The War That Forged a Nation (McPherson)
July 16 - Between the World and Me (Coates)
July 22 - I Will Fear No Evil (Heinlein)
July 22 - Moral Imagination (Bromwich)
July 24 - One Man Against the World (Weiner)
July 27 - Milestones to Disaster (Churchill)
July 28 - Ragtime (Doctorow)
July 30 - Seven Years in Tibet (Harrer)
July 30 - A Guide To the Good Life (Irvine)
Aug 1 - Alone (Churchill)
Aug 4 - A Man in Full (Wolfe)
Aug 5 - Black Like Me (Griffin)
Aug 8 - The Grand Alliance (Churchill)
Aug 8 - Fabricated (Lipson)
Aug 10 - A Primate’s Memoir (Sapolsky)
Aug 12 - Skunkworks (Rich)
Aug 13 - Cell and Organ Printing (ed. Ringeisen, Spargo, Wu)
Aug 15 - Triumph and Tragedy (Churchill)
Aug 15 - Fairy Gold (Rhys)
Aug 16 - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court (Twain)
Aug 19 - Isaac’s Storm (Larson)
My lawn. Get thee off it.
[–]lilpetunia 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 12分前 (0子コメント)
Damn, that's a lot of Heinlein.
[+]mEsjycCxNe8y7x スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 1時間前 (21子コメント)
Lol. I'm getting it from the various comics where you make those jokes, pal. I'd dig them up for you if I wasn't on mobile, though you surely know the ones I'm talking about.
[–]MrWeiner 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント 1時間前 (8子コメント)
Careful. If you clutch those pearls much harder they might break.
[–]mEsjycCxNe8y7x -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 1時間前 (7子コメント)
Is that what you think I'm doing?
Could you explain this joke for me? Because I must not have gotten it--since you have a BA in Lit and read a lot of non-STEM books, you would never make a "humanities are bullshit"-type joke, right?
[–]MrWeiner 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 1時間前 (6子コメント)
I believe you're conflating the academic experience of learning non-STEM stuff with actually reading non-STEM stuff. I think you can claim the way lit theory is taught is generally bullshit without believing the humanities as a life pursuit (for instance, writing books and comics for a living) is all bullshit.
[–]FriendlyCommie 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 1時間前 (3子コメント)
I hate the way my classes are taught but I love the subject. I can relate.
[–]MrWeiner 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間前 (2子コメント)
Bingo. Hamlet reads just fine without learning some bullshit Freud made up about it, thank you very much.
[–]mEsjycCxNe8y7x -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 28分前* (0子コメント)
So what was the joke in the comic, again? That humanities in education are all bullshit, or what?
And thanks for the tweet about me, ooo la la
[–]TheInsecureGoat 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 1時間前 (11子コメント)
I don't think those would necessarily reflect his views. When a character says something it doesn't mean that the author agrees with it.
Edit: obviously it would help for you to point some out.
[–]mEsjycCxNe8y7x 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (10子コメント)
A recent one. I guess someone might say that the joke is simply the inversion of the exam nightmare trope, but that doesn't really explain what seems to be a few pretty cheap potshots. So I'm confused as to what we're supposed to laugh at here, if not that part. Especially given the extra panel. Maybe that someone thinks that theory et al is bullshit, so the trope inversion is funny? Maybe that people might tend to write confident bullshit in classes like that? I don't know. Either way, humanities isn't exactly respected here, which is different from his other comics, where-in the joke is more focused on the person.
You'll note that I didn't say shit about him personally, which makes his defense--that he would never make those jokes since he has a Lit BA and reads a lot of nonSTEM books--strange, if not grasping.
[–]pompouspug[S] 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間前 (9子コメント)
I think there is a noticable difference between taking a lighthearted jab at something and
durr hurr STEM is the only valuable pursuit
I mean, maybe you're just taking that a bit too seriously since you are probably in that field?
[–]mEsjycCxNe8y7x 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1時間前 (8子コメント)
You're right, I shouldn't have conflated the whole thought. But the joke reflects a pretty proSTEM only attitude towards the humanities.
[–]pompouspug[S] 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 52分前 (3子コメント)
You know, this isn't really a fight between humanities and STEM. Reddit loves to jerk on that, but (I can only judge from my experience here) STEM-people in the real world don't really think of humanities as lesser subjects.
I work in STEM and everybody there makes jokes about everybody else. We basically just hate everyone.
Mathematicians and theoretical physicists are often the butt of "DAE 99% USELESS" jokes, while more practical stuff (engineering, CS, biology) are often jokingly reduced to "nice how you research/do stuff you don't really understand".
If you actually ask people in STEM what they think of sociology, history, literary, theology etc. students, you will find that most people (there are always assholes) think it's important that these subjects exist and that humanity delves into these subjects.
[–]Roxinos 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 58分前 (3子コメント)
I actually think it reflects more on your perception of value than it does on Mr. Weiner's. Even if Zach is saying that the humanities are easier than the STEM fields (which he isn't), that doesn't mean that he's saying the STEM fields are better. It's only "pretty pro-STEM" if he's both stating that they're easier than STEM fields and that difficulty of a field directly corresponds to its value.
And I'm pretty fucking sure that he's not saying either of those things.
[–]drancks 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1時間前* (0子コメント)
Gonna take a moment to fanboy atcha and say I really enjoy your comics and I miss SMBC theatre. Also do you have something that tells you when someone links your comics? I don't think I've ever seen you in /r/circlebroke before.
[–]natalia___ 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Innovative new technology to rival Bitcoin and Tesla
[–]neveranerevarine 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Muh biotroofs!
[–]snitaarkeesian 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
STATISTICS ARENT RACIST SEXIST
π Rendered by PID 23607 on app-25 at 2015-08-19 17:01:21.983255+00:00 running e7ae411 country code: JP.
[–]MrWeiner 99ポイント100ポイント101ポイント (43子コメント)
[–]natalia___ 50ポイント51ポイント52ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Maxnwil 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]natalia___ 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Aethe 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Deimorz 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]pompouspug[S] 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]WorseThanHipster 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Suddenly_Elmo 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (34子コメント)
[–]natalia___ 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Suddenly_Elmo 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Thesket 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Suddenly_Elmo 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]MrWeiner 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]azmyth 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MrWeiner 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]WorseThanHipster 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]natalia___ 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]mEsjycCxNe8y7x スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (24子コメント)
[–]MrWeiner 36ポイント37ポイント38ポイント (23子コメント)
[–]lilpetunia 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]mEsjycCxNe8y7x スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (21子コメント)
[–]MrWeiner 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]mEsjycCxNe8y7x -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]MrWeiner 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]FriendlyCommie 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]MrWeiner 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]mEsjycCxNe8y7x -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TheInsecureGoat 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]mEsjycCxNe8y7x 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]pompouspug[S] 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]mEsjycCxNe8y7x 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]pompouspug[S] 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Roxinos 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]drancks 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]natalia___ 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]neveranerevarine 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]snitaarkeesian 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)