all 59 comments

[–]TeOr2419Bratushki-Soldatushki 105 points106 points  (25 children)

You got two salt, Marple and coast! And you are even asking for more?

ADD: you can move your settler to the eastern hill and settle there

[–]WhyAmIMrPinkJust f*ckin' watch me! 60 points61 points  (8 children)

And two deer and a sheep. OP is greedy as fuck.

[–]Apocareddit9 im so clover 18 points19 points  (1 child)

people these days, amiright?

[–]pooroldedgar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Venetians have always tightfisted.

[–]Pidgey_OP 5 points6 points  (0 children)

hill on a river or settle on the salt on the coast next to the river.

kids got options

[–]jb_gShip of The Line coming to kill ya 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Not to mention a huge Dance of the Aurora potential!

[–]SultanOfSantosIf it ain't Dutch, it ain't much. 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Some food and production tiles would be nice too.

[–]balanceofpower 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But are those resources enough to compensate for all that tundra and ice? isn't there a risk of having a stunted capital that can't grow to fruition because of those tiles?

[–]scully645and YOU get a harbor and YOU get a harbor! 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah man! You got MARPLE!

[–]dontnormally 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marple

teehee

[–]SViceDines in Hell 30 points31 points  (2 children)

The Game confused your civ with Sweden, It seems.

[–]Grandpocalypse 3 points4 points  (1 child)

More like the Hansa.

[–]XxLokixX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking Russia

[–]oblisk 13 points14 points  (1 child)

Save? I'd be interested in seeing how this plays out.

[–]bandrami[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Give me a sec... I did save it, and I'll put it up on civsaves

[–]jamesabeChu-Ko-Nu Apocalypse 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This thread is the exact opposite of no Petra 0/10

[–]avieor1 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I dare you to play this save... With raging barbarians

[–]bandrami[S] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Well I can't add raging to the save, but I am interested in trying this save.

[–]avieor1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you can if you edit the save file. If you send the file to me I will add raging barbarians in for you if you want.

[–]G00BY_PLS 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You won't ride it out. No balls.

[–]PossibilityZero 1 point2 points  (1 child)

1st thing, move your warrior to the patch of forest NE of your settler to get a better view. There might be coast within 2 or 3 moves. Maybe follow the river.

[–]L0ngp1nk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There will be coast all right, coast blocked off on both sides by ice!

[–]ugubriat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Salt 10/10 would settle

[–]Eldis 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Wtf? This is pretty good. Just move two tiles east on top of the salt and you have river, deer and sheep on top of the two salts. You miss one mine, but that's not a big loss in any way.

[–]seemedlikeagoodplan 4 points5 points  (4 children)

The problem is that it looks like there will be very few growth tiles. There are 6 or 7 pretty nice tiles and the rest are crap. The two salt tiles will have 3 food with mines, and the deer will have 3 food with a granary (or 4 with Goddess of the Hunt, but that seems unlikely). Beyond that, it'll be Civil Service before there are any 3 food tiles, and you'll never get any 4 food tiles. Also there's no coast. Venice's shtick is getting one huge city with a bunch of trade routes, preferably ocean trade routes, to make lots of money. But here there is very little in the way of gold from the terrain. Marble and 2 salts... that's it. And very little food and production.

[–]nokei 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Isn't the north end of that river ocean?

[–]seemedlikeagoodplan 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Looks like it might be, actually. But tundra + coast often means an icebound sea.

[–]nokei 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The sad truth, most of the games I've played Venice as in this situation I would at best get one coastal city state in my section of the ice blockade.

[–]WeaselSlayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do it.

[–]Lunatic49Chairman Mao is our savior and he will BURN YOU ALL! 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least you didn't start in the snow.

[–]beeblez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still winable. Venice is OP. Coast helps but is in no way required. Settle on river and you're off to the races.

[–]tomjim04 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's your coastal bias. Have fun using caravans.

[–]EnigmaticChemistNothing like a Militia Winning a Naval Battle, wait huh? 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Helping some friends who are new to the game and insisted on playing on settler. I took venice, thinking at least i can be back up if needed and control the economy.

I am not able to trade with any Civs, they are all too far away. The city states that we are near are poor as hell. And then i remembered why Venice on settler is not a good idea, the other Civs AIs are well retarded and therefore broke as hell so no luxury trading is going to happen for GPT.

I am just lucky i am good at tall and settler is a joke.

[–]SnipeCity73 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I actually laughed when the imgur loaded