I'm finally feeling better and I've decided to and write about some borderline Neo-Nazi, Hitler idolizing, Nazi Germany apologizing, Jew conspiring, hash singing garbage from Stromfr...., I mean /r/conspiracy. Let's start out with this post,

Was Adolf Hitler really as bad as history books make him out to be? (Genuine question, explanation in text Link

Now lets look at the top comment.

Hitler was an extraordinary leader. He completely reformed and restored the German economy over the span of only a few years. He took Germany from a pathetic basket case to the strongest industrial nation in Europe. Until the outbreak of WW2, he was acclaimed all over the world by many leading intellectuals. I don't believe most people today really comprehend the power of negative propaganda. Since the 1930s, even before the outbreak of the War, the Jews ceaselessly attacked and smeared and demonized and mocked and reviled Hitler and the Nazis in the numerous magazines and newspapers they controlled. As the decades rolled on, Jewish control over Western media only became more pervasive, and their demonization of Hitler never stopped. We see it every day even today, seventy years or so later. Every day, on the Internet, on television, in newspapers and magazines, Hitler is presented as (paradoxically) a bumbling clown and a joke, but also as the most dangerous maniac and monster of all human history. People, it's propaganda. It's black, negative propaganda. Hitler was a man. He wasn't a perfect man, because there are no perfect men. He was a better man than many who have been idolized and exalted by the history books. Look at Stalin. He murdered millions of his own people, and until recently he was good old Uncle Joe in the media, and all the liberal leftist intellectuals loved him. Anyone today who thinks they understand Hitler, be aware that all you think you know about him has been planted in your head by unrelenting media and school propaganda, every single day of your life. Unless you have deliberately stepped back from the media propaganda, and researched Hitler in alternative history texts -- texts that do not automatically parrot the media propaganda line -- you will have no way to evaluate Hitler the man in any rational or fair manner. You will simple accept the image you have been brainwashed to accept.

Well I shouldn't be surprised, this is the kind of insane, anti-Semitic poppycock (heh) I've come to expect from /r/europea..., I mean /r/conspiracy. I won't even bother to break it down, it speaks for itself.

Take a look at this.

The jews wanted to subjugate the german people by using banking cartels and by owning the biggest enterprises. with the protocols of the elders of scion the jews created a plan to rule all of europe and the world. hitler saw this happening and fought back against it. his methods were very deplorable, but he did have good reason.

This was sitting at +2 at time of writing.Let's take a look at the replies.

^ This type of shit is why people accuse this sub of being anti-Semitic. EDIT: I think it's funny that the mods clearly agreed with me (since they deleted the comment), yet I'm still being blindly downvoted by people who can no longer even see the commen that I was replying to (Hint: it was anti-Semitic as fuck). +1

---

Dude this shit is anti Semitic lol almost every post involves Israel and how they are behind all the bad shit in the world lol -6

---

So what you are saying is "Hitler had good reason to hunt an entire religion" because they wanted to "subjugate the german people through banking." First of all germans and jews are not 2 seperate peoples, a person can be both. Also, even if the jews in banking were doing this, which you fail to evidence, how does that make it ok to kill/imprison all jews even those not involved with banking? -3

Lets look at some other replies shall we.

http://rense.com/general17/bushhitler.htm[1] Some theories have Hitler as a CIA operative. The more you look into the entire situation the more it actually makes sense. -2 Link

Okay that's enough. Lets check out this other thread.

Is there really any solid evidence behind the gas chambers? Many scholars, including Jewish ones, say no. Why would they incinerate bodies pumped full of explosive gas? Why would they spend so much on lethal gas when they could have just stopped food or water rations? Millions of people did die in concentration camps, however 6 million Jews? No. The number is closer to between 100-200 thousand. There were not even 6 millions Jewish persons living in Europe at the time. Was there an extermination of the Jewish population? Likely not. As you said, there is no evidence. Most of the Jewish lives lost were from the Allies bombing the railroads and halting the flow of food into the camps, thus causing the prisoners to starve to death. In this light, did the "holocaust" really happen? Being objective, not really, but it depends how you define it. Were a lot of innocent lives lost in a horrible set of events set in motion by an evil dictator? Absolutely. Were one group of people singled out on top of other groups? Yes. Was it awful? Yes. +7 Link

I've never, ever in all my years on the Internet heard someone say that 6 million Jews couldn't have died in the Holocaust because they weren't enough Jews in Europe. The rest of it is just uh.

Okay last one.

"I'm not prejudiced or Antisemitic at all but aside from, "Anti Semitism" the Third Reich actually was very progressive for their time."

......

Really the Antisemitism myths are very overblown, the Holocaust did on some level happen but not as dramatic as the Jewish community tried to say it was. I honestly think they try and mention it to get pity and then try and use it as a trump card it gives them the advantage of looking like a victim.

Honestly, Adolf Hitler was freely elected by the German people, and he did actually help propel Germany into an era of some of the best unity and technological advancement Germany ever had. Adolf Hitler started the autobahn which helped Germany immensely. He also started one of the first animal cruelty bans on a national level in Europe. Not to mention a very effective anti-smoking campaign which was very progressive at the time because smoking wasn't seen as that bad of a thing.

He actually did believe he was doing the right thing for Germany. One famous story told of Adolf Hitler eating dinner with the other Axis leaders. The other Axis leaders ate very posh dinners usually associated with the higher class while Hitler actually chose a relatively modest dinner, when asked about this by one of Axis leaders Hitler replied that eating a big dinner while many of Germany went hungry would make him a hypocrite.

If you actually read, "Mein Kampf" also known as, "My Struggle" it's actually a very interesting historical account of Adolf Hitler's life, some very interesting things. I actually think it should be required reading for High Schoolers studying World War II because it is essentially a historical account.

By reading the book you'll actually find out Adolf Hitler really did have a rough time of it, before the war he was a dispossessed artist who made little money if any. This was not uncommon, Germany at that time was in shambles, the military was almost nonexistent, the Treaty of Versailles really was making Germany at full blame for the war even though technically they didn't start the war.

To be honest, the Allies actually did do a lot of war crimes that are often ignored because all the blame is deflected onto the losers, history is written by the victors. I honestly don't hate Jewish people, I just think Israeli culture can be very toxic.

Let's break it down guys. :[

Really the Antisemitism myths are very overblown, the Holocaust did on some level happen but not as dramatic as the Jewish community tried to say it was. I honestly think they try and mention it to get pity and then try and use it as a trump card it gives them the advantage of looking like a victim.

Huh.

Honestly, Adolf Hitler was freely elected by the German people, and he did actually help propel Germany into an era of some of the best unity and technological advancement Germany ever had.

No he wasn't and no he didn't.

Adolf Hitler started the autobahn which helped Germany immensely.

He started no such thing. He did invest more resources into it, but it was more for it's military benefit than anything else.

He also started one of the first animal cruelty bans on a national level in Europe. Not to mention a very effective anti-smoking campaign which was very progressive at the time because smoking wasn't seen as that bad of a thing.

Well holocaust forgiven then.

He actually did believe he was doing the right thing for Germany. One famous story told of Adolf Hitler eating dinner with the other Axis leaders. The other Axis leaders ate very posh dinners usually associated with the higher class while Hitler actually chose a relatively modest dinner, when asked about this by one of Axis leaders Hitler replied that eating a big dinner while many of Germany went hungry would make him a hypocrite.

Hold on guys, I've got to make a call. From wikipedia

The chief leaders were Benito Mussolini of Italy, Adolf Hitler of Nazi Germany, and Emperor Hirohito (alongside his Prime Ministers, Hideki Tojo and Fumimaro Konoe) of Japan. Unlike what happened with the Allies, there was never a joint meeting of the main Axis heads of government, although Mussolini and Hitler did meet on a regular basis.

---

If you actually read, "Mein Kampf" also known as, "My Struggle" it's actually a very interesting historical account of Adolf Hitler's life, some very interesting things. I actually think it should be required reading for High Schoolers studying World War II because it is essentially a historical account.

Not even going to bother.

By reading the book you'll actually find out Adolf Hitler really did have a rough time of it, before the war he was a dispossessed artist who made little money if any. This was not uncommon, Germany at that time was in shambles, the military was almost nonexistent, the Treaty of Versailles really was making Germany at full blame for the war even though technically they didn't start the war.

Come on guys, haven't we all been in that rut were we start a war of aggression and end up killing 12 million people because of a racist ideology. I know I have. Now about this Treaty of Versailles hogwash (heh). Completely untrue.

To be honest, the Allies actually did do a lot of war crimes that are often ignored because all the blame is deflected onto the losers, history is written by the victors.

What aboutism and history written by the victors. It must be my birthday again because I can't stop crying.

I honestly don't hate Jewish people, I just think Israeli culture can be very toxic.

Oh you.