/
    Skip to main content
    Advertisement

    Why can straight white men have sex with men without social consequences?

    Zach Stafford
    White men have more room to push sexual boundaries without being immediately being treated like they have a pathological problem
    lgbt
    “But why are all these straight men vying to take a swim in the rainbow pool?” Photograph: David Levene for The Guardian
    If I have learned anything in my life so far, it’s that the only group of people more obsessed with touching a penis than gay men is straight ones. Promise.
    I began noticing this all the way back at my very white elementary school, when boys would roughhouse and grope each other on the playground while always making sure to punctuate their grabs with gay slurs that called the receiver of that grab a homosexual.
    As I got older, those grabs evolved. And over time – especially once I got to my very white college – the grabs from straight men became caressing or kissing or, for the bold, sex. And during all of this, these men, these straight men who were always my bully growing up or even in college classrooms, maintained their straightness while I was constantly reminded of how they despised my gayness even as I entertained their episodic gay-interests.
    And I am not alone in being the object of ambivalent, conflicted desire by men who identify as straight.
    “I think homosexual desire and homosexual contact are staples of the human experience,” professor Jane Ward, University of California, Riverside, recently told me. “But are also subject to incredible cultural baggage.”
    But why are all these straight men vying to take a swim in the rainbow pool?
    Ward, who recently published her latest book, Not Gay: Sex Between Straight White Men, asked herself a similar question years back after hearing from a man she went on a date with about how ‘gay’ his straight fraternity had been.
    From her research, she has arrived at an interesting conclusion: straight men – specifically white men – are having sex with other men to affirm just how straight they are, because to be straight and still be able to perform ‘gay sex’ – while always remaining uninterested – is the height of white masculinity. And they are the primary group doing this, because they can.
    “Sometimes white people, and men in particular, bristle at the concept of ‘privilege,’” she says, speaking more broadly about the term that many use to describe inherent advantages white people have due to skin color.
    “But in the context of [my] book, recognizing privilege isn’t about denying what is unique about individual straight white men; it’s about recognizing that straight white men have some unique cultural resources they can draw on to explain away and justify their presumably discordant sex practices.”
    According to Ward, this behavior is very much tied to their white privilege, heteronormativety and male privilege to create a nexus in which straight white men can have sex with one another and face no repercussions.
    “White men have more room to push sexual boundaries without being immediately pathologized [due to their privileges],” she continued.
    And she’s right – and I am annoyed that she is on a certain level.
    So far this year, LGBTQ people of color – especially transgender women of color – have faced record-breaking amounts of violence – a 20-year-old transgender woman was murdered in Dallas this week. Her name was Shade Schuler.
    The group that faces less violence, while perpetuating it the quickest in our current moment, is straight white men.
    I don’t have an issue with straight men having sex with other men and not calling it gay or having it change their identity. People can and should do whatever they desire as long as it’s consensual. But what I find annoying is how this game called life is so unevenly stacked – with one group holding all the cards.
    We see that with the disproportionate ways in which people of color face police violence, poverty, health disparities and this list could keep going.
    As a gay man, who has faced violence for being gay, to see evidence that shows the very men that perpetuate this violence are doing the same sexual acts as me to show just how ‘straight’ they are is absolutely gross - and homophobic at best.
    (Or how problematic is that white straight men get a whole book in many ways defending their straightness, but black men are most of the time demonized with words like ‘down low’ in books about their lives.)
    Being gay is still not easy, especially as a person of color. And thanks to the help of the marriage equality movement, being gay is becoming less and less gay, and much more straight – with many seeing ‘us’ as finally close to being straight. This thought has even led to our gayborhoods beginning to disappear as acceptance of LGBT people rises.
    In 2015, gay seems to be less gay than it ever has been. And while I want acceptance of us in the world at large, I still want us. I want us queer, I want us to have individualistic characteristics as a group, I want us to have something that is ours and not something that a straight white man can play with to prove just how much of a man he is.
    But what I don’t want is to hear that white privilege not only lets straight men get paid more than me, face less violence than me, live longer than people like me, but also have sex with other men and not facing any of the violence people like me face – because that is incredibly infuriating.
    • This article was amended on 13 August 2015. The article has been amended to reflect the fact that Shade Schuler was killed in Dallas, not Detroit. An earlier version also misspelled Schuler’s name and been corrected.

    comments (724)

    Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
    This discussion is closed for comments.
    We’re doing some maintenance right now. You can still read comments, but please come back later to add your own.
    Commenting has been disabled for this account (why?)
    1 2 3 4 12 next
    Loading comments… Trouble loading?
    • 0 1
      This is of joke! Man having sex with other mans is of homosex, not of straight! Period. Stop being of denial!
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      This comment is intended to give everyone an idea as to the level of "scholarship" that went into this "research" by professor Jane Ward, University of California, Riverside. Brace yourself.
      Ward opens with a story about a fraternity ritual called "the elephant walk" involving a group of male pledges standing in a circle, each sticking one thumb up the ass of the person in front of them and the other thumb in their own mouth, and then walking like that in a circle. The author claims this is "well documented by other scholars" as per the quote below.
      I began this book with the example of the elephant walk not because it is my most convincing piece of "data"; regrettable, I have never witnessed it (though it has been well documented by other scholars[2]).
      When one looks at the citation so referenced (link to screenshot below), what does one see?
      Well, there is a reference to one other author (Michael Kimmel) writing about this, in addition to a reference to (get this!) URBANDICTIONARY.COM. Yes, that's right. This author cites URBANDICTIONARY.COM as evidence that this "elephant walk" is "well documented by other scholars." No kidding.
      So yeah, just so everyone is aware, Jane Ward considers urbandictionary.com a scholarly source for her "research."
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      Frankly, anyone over the age of ~15 still fooling around with/interested in the same sex may as well get over it and acknowledge that they are at least bi. "Identifying straight" in such circumstances is simply what we commonly refer to as "in the closet". Denial is not just a river in Africa.
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      I rate this article Guardian/10.
      Reply |
    • This comment was removed by a moderator because it didn't abide by our community standards. Replies may also be deleted. For more detail see our FAQs.
    • 2 3
      Life is too short for any of us to palaver over hideous academic words like "heteronormativity."
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      Can straight men have sex with straight men?
      Can green be yellow (or at least red) ?
      Reply |
      • 0 1
        It can if we say so. It has the freedom to identify as red whenever it likes and doesn't need your permission. It's the patriarchy, don't you know? You have to stop oppressing me with your subspectral norms. Love , hugs and kisses, Ochre xx
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        Of course not, It's impossible for a person to have sex with someone they are not sexually attracted to. That is a thing that has never happened once in the entire history of our species.
        Reply |
    • 4 5
      Straight white man here, nearly 60 years old. I've never touched another man's penis, nor had the slightest desire to do so.
      The "straight" men the author talks about seem to be just old-fashioned closeted gay men.
      Reply |
    • 4 5
      I began noticing this all the way back at my very white elementary school, when boys would roughhouse and grope each other on the playground while always making sure to punctuate their grabs with gay slurs that called the receiver of that grab a homosexual.
      As I got older, those grabs evolved. And over time – especially once I got to my very white college – the grabs from straight men became caressing or kissing or, for the bold, sex.
      What the ever-loving fuck? This is the most bizarre description of "roughhousing" I've ever seen. Certainly nothing I've ever experienced or heard about before. The author is clearly either playing a joke on all of us, or else insane.
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      Straight male here- and former fraternity ritualist. I don't remember seeing any of this- and occasionally a fraternity brother/friend would come out (in both cases- no surprise).
      I guess a horny gale male can see any straight activity as homoerotic. I get turned on when the female intern changes the paper in the copier.
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      because they can't?
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      As a straight whit male psychiatrist who hears intimate details of other people's lives on a daily basis, my basic reaction as I read this article is "what?"
      There are no statistics here and absolutely no tangible information to go on. I'm very skeptical that this article represents the nature and behavior of the majority of straight white men in a substantial way.
      Reply |
      • 1 2
        It looks like an attempt at bi-erasure dressed up as a polemic against cultural appropriation.
        Reply |
      • 1 2
        The statistics and 'tangible information' you seek is the research covered by the book mentioned, by an Associate Professor of Women's Studies at the University of California, Riverside.
        Neither the article nor the book claims to discuss what 'the majority of straight white men' are doing. There is no implicit 'all' or 'most' when 'straight white men' are mentioned.
        Reply |
      • 1 2
        If they have sex with other men, why are they straight? Why aren't they bisexual or homosexual? How do you define "homosexual" anyway? It's ridiculous.
        Reply |
    • 0 1
      Didn't Nathan Barley cover this story in episode 5?
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      From the book website:-
      "Jane Ward is Associate Professor of Women's Studies at the University of California, Riverside. She is the author of Respectably Queer (2008)."
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      But what I don’t want is to hear that white privilege not only lets straight men get paid more than me, face less violence than me, live longer than people like me, but also have sex with other men and not facing any of the violence people like me face – because that is incredibly infuriating.
      Only The Guardian could turn a situation in which bisexual white men face less violence than bisexual ethnic minorities into a shameful case of white privilege instead of a story about homophobia among ethnic minorities.
      Reply |
      • 0 1
        Only The Guardian could turn a situation in which bisexual white men face less violence than bisexual ethnic minorities into a shameful case of white privilege instead of a story about homophobia among ethnic minorities.
        The former doesn't necessarily lead to the latter either.
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        I never claimed there was a causal connection between a (comparative) lack of violence towards white men who experiment with the greater violence directed towards minority ethnics who experiment.
        It's not a zero sum game where gay-bashers decide to transfer the violence they would hitherto have directed at white men to ethnic minorities.
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        No, I meant that you were suggesting that the logical focus of Stafford's complaints would instead be homophobia amongst ethnic minorities, but I don't think it follows that this is the source of what he is complaining about.
        Although in any event, we would need to establish that white men do experience less violence for experimentation than ethnic minorities do, and I'm not convinced that's necessarily the case.
        Reply |
    • 0 1
      According to Ward, this behavior is very much tied to their white privilege, heteronormativety and male privilege to create a nexus in which straight white men can have sex with one another and face no repercussions.
      This sounds like a roundabout way of dressing up sexual experimentation among white men as 'privilege' rather than admitting less experimentation among ethnic minorities might be down to homophobia.
      Reply |
      • 0 1
        Only if there is less experimentation. I don't think that's being argued (as I understand it, the book provides for no comparative rates) but that the experimentation or sexual contact is considered differently.
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        Let's assume, for argument, that there is an equal amount of experimentation across cultural groups.
        Why is this greater acceptability among white men characterised as 'white privilege' when the lower acceptability among ethnic minorities could more sensibly be characterised as homophobia?
        Reply |
      • 0 1
        Why is this greater acceptability among white men characterised as 'white privilege' when the lower acceptability among ethnic minorities could more sensibly be characterised as homophobia?
        I suppose because white gay and bi men are not exempt from experiencing homophobia, that doesn't suggest any greater tolerance of homosexuality.
        But in some ways the article distorts the point. There isn't comparative evidence of the relevant tolerance of otherwise of those who have same-sex activity, but rather the author was initially noting that there are certain forms of same-sex activity, such as during frat initiations and the like, which remain unexamined and do not attract claims as to repression or bisexuality in a way that other forms do.
        Reply |
    • 1 2
      Female professor from Cali telling white men of whatever persuasion how they are doing it wrong.
      Jeez, can't even have a man2man dabble without some feminist academic finger wagging.....
      On t'other hand there are several hilarious reviews of this "research" work.
      Reply |
      • 0 1
        Female professor from Cali telling white men of whatever persuasion how they are doing it wrong.
        Only via Stafford's interpretation of it. In the interviews I've read with her, she doesn't seem to be suggesting anyone's doing anything wrong, or that there's a right way to do it. Some of her stuff seems to over-reach, but there are some sound points within it.
        Reply |
    • 0 1
      Hey Zach: Since penis touching does not result in negative social consequences you will have to look for another reason for the negative social consequences you are feeling.
      Reply |
    • 10 11
      I've decided to cancel my subscription to The Onion.
      The Guardian is supplying all the absurdity I need.
      Reply |
    • 5 6
      'straight' men who chase after gay men are as straight as Rachel Dolezal is black.
      Reply |
    • 1 2
      It is tenderness and vulnerability than conservative men fear, not wrestling and f**king and dominating.
      Reply |
    • 3 4
      The Greeks used formal pederasty to enforce a patriarchal culture that held women in contempt, intellectually. But the pederast was expected to 'grow up', marry and procreate and become a patrician, passive 'womanly' sexuality was always considered humiliating and the men who persisted in homosexuality were likewise mocked and reviled.
      There is no wall between homosexual acts and reactionary masculinity. The one can enforce the other.
      Reply |
    • 0 1
      That explains why Republicans are so homophobic.
      Reply |
    • 2 3
      The article has also been amended to reflect the fact that Shade Schuler was killed this week in Dallas, not Detroit. The original also misspelled Schuler’s name and has since been corrected.
      You tried to hang this entire 'article' on this horrific murder, and you got neither the city or the person's name right? Ok then.
      Reply |
    1 2 3 4 12 next
    SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
    SECURITY WARNING: Please treat the URL above as you would your password and do not share it with anyone. See the Facebook Help Center for more information.
    desktop
    0%
    10%
    20%
    30%
    40%
    50%
    60%
    70%
    80%
    90%
    100%