use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
157 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
English language content relating to Germany. Postings in German will be removed, please post them to /r/de for example.
Englischsprachige Inhalte mit Bezug zu Deutschland. Beiträge auf Deutsch werden entfernt, bitte poste diese beispielsweise in /r/de.
Upcoming subreddit exchanges on /r/de:
- Friday, 14th of August: Israel
- Sunday, 27th of August: Denmark
Studying in Germany? Read this NOW! Got a question? Check the WIKI! DACH Chat (German)
Other German-related reddits: DACH Portal /r/de Learn German /r/German /r/GermanPractice /r/GermanImmersion /r/GermanFacts Our neighbours: /r/europe /r/austria /r/belgium /r/czech /r/denmark /r/france /r/luxembourg /r/poland /r/thenetherlands /r/switzerland Other related reddits /r/buecher /r/de_IT /r/de_podcasts /r/de_punk /r/DEjobs (new!) /r/deutsche_queers /r/DFB /r/Dokumentationen /r/erasmus /r/fahrrad (new!) /r/fernsehen /r/filme /r/filmemacher /r/fitnessDE /r/fragreddit /r/germanmovies /r/germanvideos (new!) /r/germantrees /r/germanyusa /r/germusic /r/germanrap /r/GermanyPics (new!) /r/kochen /r/recht (lawyers!) /r/rocketbeans /r/SCHLAND /r/tu_chemnitz /r/wirtschaft /r/wissenschaft /r/witze /r/zocken /r/Interrail /r/MyCountryVsYours
DACH Portal
/r/de
/r/German
/r/GermanPractice
/r/GermanImmersion
/r/GermanFacts
/r/europe
/r/austria
/r/belgium
/r/czech
/r/denmark
/r/france
/r/luxembourg
/r/poland
/r/thenetherlands
/r/switzerland
/r/buecher
/r/de_IT
/r/de_podcasts
/r/de_punk
/r/DEjobs (new!)
/r/deutsche_queers
/r/DFB
/r/Dokumentationen
/r/erasmus
/r/fahrrad (new!)
/r/fernsehen
/r/filme
/r/filmemacher
/r/fitnessDE
/r/fragreddit
/r/germanmovies
/r/germanvideos (new!)
/r/germantrees
/r/germanyusa
/r/germusic
/r/germanrap
/r/GermanyPics (new!)
/r/kochen
/r/recht (lawyers!)
/r/rocketbeans
/r/SCHLAND
/r/tu_chemnitz
/r/wirtschaft
/r/wissenschaft
/r/witze
/r/zocken
/r/Interrail
/r/MyCountryVsYours
/r/aachen
/r/augsburg
/r/berlin
/r/bonn
/r/braunschweig
/r/bremen
/r/cologne
/r/chemnitz
/r/darmstadt
/r/dortmund
/r/dresden
/r/duesseldorf
/r/erlangen
/r/frankfurt
/r/freiburg
/r/hamburg
/r/hannover
/r/heidelberg
/r/karlsruhe
/r/kiel
/r/leipzig
/r/magdeburg
/r/mannheim
/r/muenster
/r/munich
/r/nurnberg
/r/regensburg
/r/stuttgart
/r/trier
/r/tuebingen
/r/wiesbaden
Guests drive neo-Nazi from Munich beer garden (thelocal.de)
kaltesterne が 1日前 投稿
[–]VaikEurope 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 21時間前 (0子コメント)
I love how people talk about mob mentality and how free speech was restricted. They didn't read the article. One guy recognized the Neo Nazi, said something to him and then went to the manager who did nothing. Some time later the Neo Nazi left. That is not a big headline. There was no mob. Nobody was restricted. One guy got told by another guy that he was a shit person and left without being forced. Don't make this into something that it's not. Read the damn article!
[–]new_DooM_Vet 21ポイント22ポイント23ポイント 1日前 (16子コメント)
First: I have zero, zip, nada, no liking of Nazis what-so-fucking-ever.
But that customer was breaking no laws (at the present) or even wanting to be noticed. Some dude coming over and yelling at him to get out because [they don't like his beliefs] is wrong IMHO.
This wasn't a debate, the nazi scumbag wasn't trying to stir up trouble here. He was just hanging out at a beer garden.
What if this was someone from Pegida?.... AfD?..... Die Linke?.... when is it ok and when is it not?
What if this was a muslim and someone was telling him to leave as they didn't like what he stood for?
What if... what if... what if..... where to draw the line. Everyone should have same rights and take care of matters under the law.
EDIT:
Way off topic but... woo, I have had this fake account for a year today haha.
[–]elgubbo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
its ALWAYS okay to state your opinion.
[–]ballsinyourm0uth 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
As long as it doesn't constitute an insult
[–]I-fuck-horses 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
That is counter to anything children are taught by reasonable parents and grandparents about acceptable behavior in public.
[–]new_DooM_Vet 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
I am no disagreeing. I just want to know what you mean.
1) Should you be able to yell at someone you think is a nazi who is eating in a restaurant?
2) Should you be able to walk over to someones table and tell them to get the fuck out of a restaurant?
3) Should you be able to start an argument with a stranger in a public place? A private business?
4) How "rude" should you be allowed to state your opinion?
5) If someone does not want to have a discussion with you, can you ever overstep trying to get them to discuss something with you.
I also believe in free speech.
[–]elgubbo 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
None of the above are acceptable and yes you can overstep boundaries.
Judging by the video - the only evidence we have - the guy did nothing of the above. The nazis where standing - and he was talking to them with a loud voice. he didn't even insult them in the video.
[–]Bristlerider 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 20時間前 (0子コメント)
Yes you can state your opinion.
But you cant go around shout people down and harass them.
That can in fact get you picked up by the police, and rightfully so.
[–]coolsubmission -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 1日前 (6子コメント)
soo what you are saying is i'm not allowed to tell nazis my opinion of them? :thumbsup:
[–]new_DooM_Vet 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
i'm not allowed to tell nazis my opinion of them
I am not a lawyer. I think that would really depend on the circumstances.
If you walked over to a nazi standing on the street and said in a reasonable tone of voice that you thought what he was doing was wrong.... I think that would be ok.
If you walked over to nazi and said that he is a lowly piece of goat shit and you hoped he and all his friends and family were destroyed.... I think that would be crossing the line... at least in Germany where (I believe) there are laws about actions taken if you insult someone.
Is anywhere the right time and place for yelling at someone to leave/telling them you disagree with them or is there a time and place where it is unacceptable?
[+]coolsubmission スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
I'm not talking about legal circumstances but ethical. But i think that either way it should be my right to tell people whose "beliefs" it is to murder me and millions others that they are assholes and they should leave.
[–]new_DooM_Vet 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
it should be my right to tell people whose "beliefs" it is to....
So, it doesn't have to be based on current actions but only beliefs that you feel strongly about?
Here I am playing the "what if" game again...
What if you saw someone a in a restaurant who was a known opponent of <fill in controversial topic here>? If you went over and called them an asshole.... who is actually being the asshole? The guy eating dinner or the guy calling people assholes?
[–]coolsubmission 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
nazism isn't a controversial topic. This guy wasn't some pegida-hobby-racist. He's a state-wide known violent nazi cadre.
[–]new_DooM_Vet 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
pegida-hobby-racist
hahah. That made me really giggle. I am going to start using that phrase!
Have a good day. =)
If you start to deal with every dangerous asshole you see on the streets, you'll never get anywhere.
[–]jagermo 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/1357/
[–]Sarkaraq 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 23時間前 (0子コメント)
Relevant for the USA. Munich is in Germany, though, which has a different approach to free speech.
[–]xkcd_transcriber 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Image
Title: Free Speech
Title-text: I can't remember where I heard this, but someone once said that defending a position by citing free speech is sort of the ultimate concession; you're saying that the most compelling thing you can say for your position is that it's not literally illegal to express.
Comic Explanation
Stats: This comic has been referenced 2250 times, representing 2.9565% of referenced xkcds.
xkcd.com | xkcd sub | Problems/Bugs? | Statistics | Stop Replying | Delete
[–]scorcher24Bayern (Fürth, Mittelfranken) 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント 1日前 (116子コメント)
The problem with this mob mentality is, where does it stop? At Nazis? Or do we continue with people we are just not comfortable with too? Like Muslims or because someone looks like a Salafist?And is driving nazis out of society really what we need and want? As long as they just sit there and talk to each other I don't see much of a problem.
No matter how you look at it, it is discrimination of a political belief. That they are extreme right winged, does not matter. Every belief is equal and we should not start this. Because if we do, we are just like them. Freedom and free speech has it's price. To sit next to someone who has a political belief you don't like is one of them.
[–]cyberdork 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント 1日前 (26子コメント)
Did you even watch the video? 2-3 people simply started to argue with them, the vast majority of the guests didn't even react to the scene. There was no shoving or anything like that. The neo nazis then just left, because they were sick of arguing. How on earth can you call that 'mob mentality'? So a group of 2-3 people is a mob to you? Anyhow, the only reason this is news is because some guy filmed this rather harmless scene with his mobile.
And that neo nazi is not simply some dude with an opinion, he was multiple times convicted of criminal assault (gefährliche Körperverletzung).
[–]Paedda 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
The problem is the implication that the owner of the beergarden should have thrown him out. Why on earth? The Nazi was not demonstrating, not screaming propaganda or something, not even quietly displaying offending symbols. Just his person being there.
Even if he is a criminal, the justice system is (or should be) dealing with that. If he has paid his fines or done his time, I'm not to apply some additional persecution on my own.
That BILD twists this into "courageous citizen expels neonazi" is annoying. What's courageous about that?
[–]elgubbo 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
where exactly is the implication in his comment that the beergarden should have thrown him out?
[–]ballsinyourm0uth -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
The headline at Bild.de contains the implication that the owner of the beer garden should have thrown him out: "Wirte sollen entschlossen reagieren" http://www.bild.de/regional/muenchen/nationalsozialismus/hasselbach-fliegt-aus-biergarten-hirschgarten-wirt-redet-42144576.bild.html
[–]Paedda -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Not in his comment, but in the original BILD news alert:
In einem Münchner Biergarten sitzen bekannte Neonazis: Der Wirt reagiert nicht. Was nun?
Known Neonazis sit in a Munich beergarden, the host doesn't react. What to do?
And in the article:
"I hope that in the future, others will react and say they won’t accept neo-Nazis in their restaurants, beer gardens, and so on.
Starting a discussion is fine, albeit a bit impolite. But I grant you, you do not have to be polite to nazis. Especially if you were assaulted by their kind in the past. I think I would just have left myself, though.
[–]Sarkaraq 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1日前 (20子コメント)
And he received his sentence, didn't he? So, why would you feel superior to the German jurisdiction and apply your own punishment?
[–]elgubbo 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 1日前 (19子コメント)
they are just talking to them - they do not punish him in any way. they use their right of free speech in telling him that they think he sucks
[–]Sarkaraq -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 1日前 (18子コメント)
they do not punish him in any way. they use their right of free speech in telling him that they think he sucks
That's not how free speech works in Germany. "You suck" is an insult, isn't it? That's not
just talking[...].
[–]elgubbo 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 1日前 (17子コメント)
Okay let me reword that. Telling someone that you think bis political belief sucks is free speech. The guy talking to him does not insult him
[–]I-fuck-horses -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Harassment is not free speech. It's harassment. I'm sure I would have participated, but at least I'm aware that's my lowest instincts ruling my behavior.
[–]alayne_ 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 22時間前 (1子コメント)
They didn't fucking harass him.
[–]Sarkaraq -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 22時間前 (0子コメント)
I'd feel harassed if somebody shouts at me in rage.
[+]Sarkaraq スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 22時間前 (13子コメント)
Stocker (the guy talking to Hasselbach) talks in a loud and aggressive way, calls him "Nazi" (to me, that's an insult, to Hasselbach it might be a compliment), admits that he is enraged and even wants the innkeeper to throw Hasselbach out which violates the AGG.
That's not just polite small-talk.
[–]elgubbo 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 22時間前 (3子コメント)
"Nazi" in this context is not an insult. he sees himself as a neonazi so you cannot insult him with that word. It would not violate the AGG - not at all. You don't know what you are talking about.
[–]Sarkaraq -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 22時間前 (2子コメント)
"Nazi" in this context is not an insult. he sees himself as a neonazi so you cannot insult him with that word.
As I said, Hasselbach may consider it to be a compliment.
It would not violate the AGG - not at all.
How?
§1 AGG: "Ziel des Gesetzes ist, Benachteiligungen aus Gründen der [...] Weltanschauung [...] zu verhindern oder zu beseitigen."
§ 2 AGG: "(1) Benachteiligungen aus einem in § 1 genannten Grund sind nach Maßgabe dieses Gesetzes unzulässig in Bezug auf: 8. den Zugang zu und die Versorgung mit Gütern und Dienstleistungen, die der Öffentlichkeit zur Verfügung stehen.
That's pretty clear. The innkeeper isn't allowed to expel guests from his Biergarten because of their world view. That's what free speech means.
Let's ask the Bundesverfassungsgericht: "In einem pluralistisch strukturierten und auf der Konzeption einer freiheitlichen Demokratie beruhenden Staatsgefüge ist jede Meinung, auch die von etwa herrschenden Vorstellungen abweichende, schutzwürdig."
http://www.servat.unibe.ch/dfr/bv033001.html#015
You don't know what you are talking about.
No reason to use ad hominem.
[–]elgubbo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 22時間前 (1子コメント)
the key here is "die der Öffentlichkeit zur Verfügung stehen." - the owner has every right to expel anyone for (almost) any reason he likes. thats why bouncers exist. Look up "hausrecht" and "privatautonomie".
[–]audaxxx 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 22時間前 (8子コメント)
Now we have Social Justice Nazis arguing that we should treat those hateful people, who stand against everything that is good, nicer. Oh, and we shouldn't call them Nazis, we need a political correct term that hopefully won't insult them. We have to let them know that the society welcomes them, that their behavior is totally fine!
/s
[–]Sarkaraq -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 22時間前 (7子コメント)
Did you just call me a Nazi? Interesting. I wasn't aware that defending the Grundgesetz was considered to be right-wing extremist. Today I learned, I guess.
We have to let them know [...] that their behavior is totally fine!
No, but we shouldn't attack people because of their world view. It's totally fine (and suggested my be) to tell them that their (former) behavior is not fine, at all.
[–]audaxxx 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 22時間前 (6子コメント)
I did call you a Social Justice Nazi, which is more or less the same than a Social Justice Warrior, but for Nazis. You care for their feelings. You want to create save spaces for those poor discriminated persons.
This is so naive. The last time that people didn't stand up (enough) against Nazis something very bad happened.
Also, do you think that an immigrant could eat and drink in peace in a Nazi-pub?
[–]elgubbo 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
No matter how you look at it, it is discrimination of a political belief. That they are extreme right winged, does not matter. Every belief is equal and we should not start this.
And i have every right to tell him that i think his political belief sucks. its not discrimination. he was not thrown out. he left on his own accord.
[+]I-fuck-horses スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
And i have every right to tell him
And I have every right to tell you what the parent commenter told you. Righteous people like you won't stop with Nazis. If you are successful it will become part of your repertoire whenever you dislike someone/something.
[–]audaxxx 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 22時間前 (1子コメント)
Indeed, people who stand against Nazis are bad persons who do that only for personal gain and that sweet, sweet state sponsored ANTIFA-money.
[–]Arvendilin 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
As a student, I could need some additional money, where do I sign up? =D
[–]elgubbo 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Yes that is your right and i won't say it is wrong to do so. But parent commenter does say its wrong.
[–]Luett_un_Luett 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Every belief is equal and we should not start this.
No, every believe is not equal. The believe that human dignity shall be inviolable (as stated in our constitution) is clearly superior and not equal to the believe that there is a worldwide jewish conspiracy and that we should eliminate the jews (as believed by e.g. the Nazis).
[–]I-fuck-horses -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
So the Nazi tried to spread that world view in the Biergarten? This must be missing from the video.
[–]audaxxx 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 22時間前 (0子コメント)
There are moments when they don't spread that bullshit, yeah. For example, when their mouth is full of Currywurst they have to stop talking until they swallowed.
[–]tmaster7331World 32ポイント33ポイント34ポイント 1日前 (26子コメント)
It's really easy: no tolerance for intolerance. Nothing against free speech, but if there are people that actually argue AGAINST free speech, they deserve to be shut down.
[–]alper 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
Not at all, tolerance means also tolerating intolerance.
[–]tmaster7331World 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7時間前 (2子コメント)
It would, but that is no good tolerance. Tolerance isn't always the thing you aim for. Or would you tolerate your neighbour you know to be a murderer? (Extreme example)
[–]alper 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 6時間前 (1子コメント)
Tolerating intolerance, not tolerating crime.
The case is for lassitude with resolve. Quashing intolerance usually breeds more of it and usually it's not that harmful. Even if it is harmful it can be withstood without too many ill consequences. But if it becomes threatening it should be destroyed with all means.
[–]tmaster7331World 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
Well, as hate speech is a crime and those neo-nazis are neo-nazis, because they actually do give hate speeches.. The line is really thin, and I'd rather get rid of that disgusting, intolerant and hateful people than preserving those extreme forms of "free speech". The concept is great, I just don't think it does always work.
[–]Arvendilin 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
There are some things you just can't tolerate, I'm not saying get forcefull or anything but stuff like the guys did here, which is stating that they think his ideology is wrong and stupid is completely okay.
Nazis did thrive and still do thrive on people tolerating and not acting and not caring =P
[–]dexter_sinisterUSA 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 1日前 (14子コメント)
Why should arguing against free speech be shut down? If you're harassing, intimidating, or assaulting people in addition to arguing against free speech, then there are plenty of laws against the former.
[–]Luett_un_Luett 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 1日前 (11子コメント)
Because he isn't just some random guy with a disgusting opinion but one of the leading Nazis in southern Germany. He isn't just someone with a different opinion but he is someone who is actively fighting and leading the fight against the very basics of our society. He's fighting our constitution, our country. He is an inner enemy. That's why he should be treated as shown in this article.
[–]Mr_C_Baxter 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 22時間前 (0子コメント)
You are wrong. Living in a Democraty implies that you have to deal with other opinions, whether you like them or not. He didnt do anything wrong in the beergarden so he has a right to stay there. And i am saying this while believing that nazis are wrong. But i also dislike your opinion, so should i be allowed to throw you out whereever i please?
[–]plspiritBayern 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
and who determines who is the enemy? in my world it's still the law not some random mob
[–]Luett_un_Luett 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
and who determines who is the enemy?
He himself
[–]I-fuck-horses -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 1日前 (6子コメント)
He is an inner enemy.
I wonder who the Nazi is here.
[–]Thaddelᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 22時間前 (5子コメント)
The one that is actively working in the Neo-Nazi scene, probably.
[–]Mr_C_Baxter -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 22時間前 (4子コメント)
Why not both?
[–]Thaddelᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 22時間前 (3子コメント)
Are both active in the Neo-Nazi scene or desire a society based on National Socialism?
[–]Mr_C_Baxter 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 22時間前 (2子コメント)
Well where i come from, beeing a nazi also means beeing intolerant, so at least where i come from it still applies to both.
Edit oh nice we downvote even questions now, gotta lova reddit
[–]Thaddelᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 21時間前 (1子コメント)
Well National Socialism isn't known for its tolerance. :D
I admit though, i was mostly being a pedant, because I don't like how inflationary (?) terms like that are used. Also because I'm a pedantic asshole.
[+]ThirdMostAverage スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
This sounds so... Nazi
[–]alper -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Free speech exists less in Germany than it does in many other nations.
[–]LawL4EverGermany 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 17時間前 (0子コメント)
I'm not sure I'd say "many other nations", but that's mostly because I don't really know much about free speech laws in countries other than the USA and Germany, but you're right that arguing against free speech is probably illegal in Germany (not an expert on this but afaik it is, at the very least it should be an edge case). I don't get why you're being downvoted tbh.
[–]plspiritBayern 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
how ironic, if you shut down people arguing against free speech, you yourself are arguing against free speech and according to you deserve to be shut down.
no, that's not how it works, free speech is for everybody.
[–]tmaster7331World 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
That's not ironic at all...
[–]plspiritBayern -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
i·ro·ny1 ˈīrənē/ noun noun: irony
the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite, typically for humorous or emphatic effect.
so speaking out to get yourself shut up is not ironic?
that's like arguing for weapons to bring peace by shooting yourself.
[–]I-fuck-horses 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Was he being intolerant? Or was he "just there". You should punish actual behavior, not (someone's) existence. Can you tell me what you are trying to accomplish? Make him change his mind? Or just pure terror, to make him/them afraid? Which of course won't work because you are unable to do enough terror. So it's just mutual escalation.
I would not mind if you had a working thought-out strategy, but you don't. All you have is righteous anger and force without thought.
[–]tmaster7331World -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Well, I don't know. I personally would not have him kicked out. But I don't mind if others do.
[–]hondaaccords -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
... That is effectively banning free speech
[–]elgubbo 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 1日前 (23子コメント)
this was not mob mentality.
https://www.wikiwand.com/de/Philipp_Hasselbach
this guy is not someone that "looks like" a nazi but is a nazi leader in southern germany. He is violent and promotes hatespeech.
He was confronted verbally.
This is not mob mentality but free speech in action.
[+]Sarkaraq スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント 1日前 (22子コメント)
This is not free speech, but discrimination because of somebody's world view.
[–]elgubbo 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 1日前 (14子コメント)
it was not discrimination. they left because they wanted to (they said so themselves) not because they where thrown out.
[+]Sarkaraq スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 1日前 (13子コメント)
Did they wanted to leave regardless or was it because of the people who were "just talking to them"?
[–]elgubbo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
They said themselves they wanted to leave
[–]Sarkaraq -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 23時間前 (2子コメント)
On their website. The guy who was "just talking to them" said that he made them leave.
So who is lying? Stocker because he want to brag about him attacking Hasselbach or Hasselbach to save his face? I don't know.
[–]audaxxx 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 22時間前 (1子コメント)
Don't worry, Stocker will probably get what he deseverses when Hasselbach visits him at home!
[–]Sarkaraq 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 22時間前 (0子コメント)
I don't see the connection to my post, at all.
[–]ballsinyourm0uth 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
Doesn't matter, the "just talking" is protected by law. If Hasselbach thinks his rights were infringed then there's legal action he can take, but neither him nor anybody else has an explicit or implicit against other people telling them what they think of them
[–]Sarkaraq -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 22時間前 (2子コメント)
Doesn't matter, the "just talking" is protected by law.
To me, it's more than talking.
If Hasselbach thinks his rights were infringed then there's legal action he can take
So, in your point of view, you are morally free to do everything as long as nobody takes legal action against you?
but neither him nor anybody else has an explicit or implicit against other people telling them what they think of them
There is a noun missing, isn't it? If not, I don't get the sentence. What's the word "an" is connected to?
[–]ballsinyourm0uth 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 6時間前 (1子コメント)
There is a noun missing, isn't it?
Sorry, I a word. Should have been: but neither he nor anybody else has an explicit or implicit right against other people telling them what they think of them
you are morally free to do everything as long as nobody takes legal action against you?
No, but I fail to see the moral argument against person A telling person B what he thinks of them
[–]Sarkaraq -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 6時間前 (0子コメント)
There is no moral argument, I guess. But in my opinion, there is a moral argument against person A shouting at person B enragedly.
[–]HereForTheFish 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
If so, where's the problem with people "just talking to them"? That's freedom of speech, ain't it?
It's about the way of talking if it's okay or not. Germany doesn't have the American freedom of speech, but a rather limited one.
To me, the way Stocker acts - loudly and aggressively - isn't "just talking" anymore. He even admits that he is enraged. Stocker also says that he asked the innkeeper to throw Hasselbach out of the Biergarten. That would have been a violation of the AGG.
Just imagine the same scene with roles reversed. Just insert "Judenfreund" or whatever instead of "Nazi". That's freedom of speech, aint it? To me, that's not okay.
I don't agree with limiting the Grundrechte of anybody.
[–]VARNUK 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 20時間前 (1子コメント)
That would have been a violation of the AGG.
Nope, no one has to serve Nazis if they don't want to. Hausrecht.
[–]Sarkaraq 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 17時間前 (0子コメント)
Yes, you are right. My mistake came from the different use of "Weltanschauung" in different laws. Once it refers to the political view, which would have caused that you have to serve Nazis. But in the AGG, it's only referring to the cultural view which allows the discrimination of Nazis.
[–]I-fuck-horses -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
[–]RobbyLee 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 23時間前* (6子コメント)
So what. They are in favor of discrimination being a valid tool to make the world a better place. If I opt to make a nazi leave the Biergarten I'm in, then I'll play by their rules.
BTW: you guys shouldn't downvote Sakaraq for his opinion. He makes me think, that's a good thing.
[–]Sarkaraq 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 22時間前 (5子コメント)
Are you also in favor of robbing robbers and assaulting bullies, torturing terrorists and murdering murderers? After all, it's just playing by their rules and if it serves a noble cause, it's fine, isn't it?
I'm glad our law system has universal rules and doesn't play by your rules.
[–]RobbyLee 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 22時間前 (4子コメント)
It doesn't feel the same, sorry. I can't really express why. A robber getting robbed would be hilarious. Of course the robber and the robber's robber robbed, so both would have to be punished.
Assaulting bullies.. that especially feels strange, because I know a bit about bullyism and I know that many of them don't know better. Also I think that self defense against a bully is always valid, just not attacking them for no reason.
What I would do, is ignoring them. I wouldn't invite them to fun things, I would talk nice to them, because I don't like the person. I don't have to like a person.
I hate violence in general, so assaulting, torturing and murdering is always off limits for me.
I think the problem is that I really hate nazis. I am a gay, half Spanish, half German man and had to witness, how 8 of my best buddies (all my buddies back then) got pulled into the nazi scene. Also we were surrounded by nazi neighbors when I was little, one gave my brother a copy of Mein Kampf when he was 16, and the neigbors flipped the finger when I biked on the street, and they wrote Spanish curse words on the cigarette dispenser at the corner, when we had a family party.
I really want nazis to be gone, so I don't have to deal with them and I can't ignore them, when they are sitting in a pub or a café with me. All my life I had to deal with those racist people, making my life a bit more miserable. I really want them to be gone, and I am in favor of discriminating them. I wouldn't sell them anything at work. I wouldn't let them in my hotel if it was mine.
I would also not let my imaginary pub become a place, where hate against peaceful people forms. I wouldn't let it become a place of hate or fear. It also meant, that peaceful immigrants would fear to enter the pub, because of the nazis.
Your examples are nothing like making nazis to leave a pub.
[–]Sarkaraq 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 21時間前 (3子コメント)
Also I think that self defense against a bully is always valid, just not attacking them for no reason.
Does this also apply for verbal attacks? If yes, then it's like the case with Nazis, isn't it?
Same for me. To me, insults are also a part of violence, though.
how 8 of my best buddies (all my buddies back then) got pulled into the nazi scene.
Out of interest: For the bullies you said that they "don't know better". Do you think that's also the case for your (former) friends?
I would also not let my imaginary pub become a place, where hate against peaceful people forms. I wouldn't let it become a place of hate or fear.
Is a pub that is visited by 5 Nazis and 100 ordinary people a place of fear? I'm sure, 99 wouldn't even notice that there are Nazis in the room. Maybe it's my lack of experience with Nazis, but I think that the vast majority isn't full-time openly attacking immigrants and communists.
It was the same logic used for exaggerated cases. It was just "playing by their rules". When I was younger, I was actually a fan of "playing by their rules" as basic point of jurisdiction. But that's more like a medieval point of view.
[–]RobbyLee 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 20時間前 (2子コメント)
I don't really blame my former buddies, they were just stupid, or naive. I blame the guys pulling them, playing nazi music when we were at their place, talking about immigrants being bad for the country.
No, nazis don't openly attack people around them. Are you from Germany or another country, because I would explain more if you were not from Germany.
Thing is, that we as the German folk really want to let go of our nazi past. Our predecessors did terrible things to foreigners, Germans and to their offspring, because we live with the shame. Nazi Germany is a really big issue in Germany. Our history classes in school are about Egypt, then comes Greece and Rome, bit of France and then a whole load of German history.
A huge part of German history is about nazi Germany. Who did what when, all the nasty details you would love to forget, but you can't because you read texts, watch movies and hear your teacher talk about nazi Germany and what our ancestors did to the world. We nationally remember the deaths of the jews in the Konzentrationslager, build statues and parks to show, that we still remember. And that we definitely do not want Germany to become nazi Germany again. There is fear. The rather intelligent, good people among us fear, that the people start to rise against refugees. What do I say start, they already do. In the alte Bundesländer (old federal states, former GDR, east Germany) nearly every week there is a refugee home burning. The pegida is a collective of frustrated douchebags, hating on imigrants, which aren't even there. Sachsen is the federal state with the least percentage of imigrants, and those people are revolting.
Then the media, especially the BILD "Zeitung" tries (and manages) to polarize the people. Hate is in advance and I fear it getting greater and greater. There are more and more political parties and groups, pretending just to be people with common sense, and then they hide their fascist mindset in their agenda, but many people don't care for politics. They read one or two statements everybody would accept. "More money for families" or "save the environment". And they don't read, that German families should get more money, and Turkish families can go back to Turkey if they want money.
And this is why most people get so unbelievably angry at nazis. This is why you can't compare nazis to robbers, bullies, even murderers. There will always be crime, and our law is there to bring justice.
Nazis on the other hand.. people who like the idea of racism, of discrimination, of killing people who are not like you, of thinking solely about themselves and making Germany "pure", the idea of Aryans being the "better human".. I can't bring myself to respect them in any way. In my eyes they are the pure evil. Not all of them of course. There are guys being pulled into the scene, yes. Like my ex boyfriend. Got bullied in school by Turkish people and the nazis helped him, and consolated him, brought him back on his path. He ascended pretty much and somehow he realised that he was a real dick. He quit the scene and joined a church. So yes, I know that some nazis don't mean to be mean, but they can't be the little lamb forever. At some point his or her thinking is the extremist thinking and then they're just another nazi.
And yes, if someone is a known nazi. If you know that he demonstrates for the NSU terror cell, if he gets a pohoto in front of a nazi flag with the Hitlergruß, then he should realise, that he made himself an enemy of the general public. And I am in favor of making them leave the Biergarten. They shouldn't be followed, they shouldn't be physically attacked, and probably not insulted. But they also shouldn't be served or appreciated in any way.
[–]Sarkaraq 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 17時間前* (0子コメント)
I'm from Germany.
In the alte Bundesländer (old federal states, former GDR, east Germany)
You mixed something up.
[–]audaxxx 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
Good post! As an explanation for /u/Sarkaraq's behaviour: He is from Hanover and we don't have a big Nazi scene here. People here are also much more passive than in other regions and just mind their business.
Not a city to start a revolution in.
[–]eean 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 23時間前 (2子コメント)
The old "First they came for the Nazis and I did not speak out" argument, lol.
Freedom and free speech has it's price. To sit next to someone who has a political belief you don't like is one of them.
Sitting silently by someone who you disagree with politically is absolutely not one of the costs of freedom and free speech! Your argument is amazingly counterintuitive: "Freedom means being required to stay silent".
This reminds me of the right-wing folks who campaign against what they see as the tyranny of political correctness in the US. They make freedom of speech arguments as well, but really they are making freedom-to-not-be-criticized arguments.
[–]scorcher24Bayern (Fürth, Mittelfranken) -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 22時間前 (1子コメント)
Go ahead, push me into the right corner even though I don't belong there. It is so convenient isn't it? To label someone who you disagree with as a right winged Person. So easy to dismantle any argument with it, without actually listening to it first. Go ahead, have the easy way. Because that is not what I said and you are just interpreting what you want to read.
[–]eean 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 14時間前 (0子コメント)
That wasn't what I said either. I was making a comparison to where I've heard this anticriticism argument before. I'm sure you aren't the only person on the left (or where ever you are) that finds political speech distasteful.
[–]labbeduddelFrankfurter Bub 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 1日前 (13子コメント)
you realize that his political affiliation is 1 hair away of being a crime. This guy has had issues with the law before.. He is not just a guy that just talks. We don't need people like him, and, I don't see why we have to keep Nazis in society... I think the country fought hard to get rid of that, to see it coming back
[–]dirkt 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
And that's why we leave prosecution of crimes to the police, and not to the mob. And if he commits a crime by expressing his beliefs, that has no connection to his right to sit in a Biergarten and drink beer.
Yes, I don't like neonazis. Yes, I'd rejoice if he left. Still, if I start overstepping my bounds in actually molesting people like these, I'm no better than they are.
[–]coolsubmission -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
no you are. But nonetheless it's your right to tell them your opinion. If they decide to leave it's their problem. If they whine about it later on it's pathetic.
[–]dirkt 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Of course it's your right to tell them your opinion. I never said otherwise.
[–]sebiroth 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 1日前 (7子コメント)
you realize that his political affiliation is 1 hair away of being a crime.
Well whenever he what he says /does is criminal, there are ways to deal with it, right? If not, who are you to judge? You'll find enough people in this country who would argue that following the Qur'an is "one hair away" from undermining our constitution.
He is not just a guy that just talks
Fine then. Let's treat him appropriately for that.
I think the country fought hard to get rid of that
Which country? Germany? When exactly?
I think we DO have a significant problem with law enforcement (police, verfassungsschutz) turning a blind eye to actual right-wing crime.
The thing about "Freedom of speech" is that it is pretty worthless as soon as you make it "Freedom of certain speech". There are laws against certain transgressions such as slander, personal insults and even things like §130(3) (which is actually problematic as it already constitutes a form of censorship). These really suffice.
I find it irritating how many superficially liberal-minded people take this "no tolerance for intolerance" talk for granted.
[–]labbeduddelFrankfurter Bub 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
so are you a fan of §130? Should we let people talk freely about the wonders of Nationalsozialismus, just because they can?
It is no censorship in anyway, because there is no sane discourse about it. People who usually whine against §130 hide under the excuse of "having a healthy debate about what happened", but we know what happened, it's very well documented. A shitty excuse to justify a bunch of holocaust deniers... As long as people who were in a freaking KZ live, this paragraph should still be valid. These people don't have the balls to go in front of a holocaust survivor to explain them how we misunderstood Hitler.. no?
BTW... I am also for branding any form of extremism illegal, Salafism must in my opinion be named an extremist organization with terrorist groups. This doesn't mean I'm painting all muslims with the same brush, because not all of them agree with extremism. There is though, NO FUCKIN NPD member that can have a sane view of society.
[–]sebiroth -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Thanks for illustrating my point. Did you know that Salafism per se is not necessarily an extremist view that leads to extremist action? At least no more than orthodox judaism, communism or whatever -ism you choose. Also, it is not an organization. Yet you in your ignorance would decide that these people must be persecuted.
It doesn't matter what laws I'm a fan of or not, and it is not my intention to defend holocaust deniers by any means. But it's no wonder that there's hardly any "sane discourse" because you can't have any discourse if one of the positions is prescribed by law.
And regarding your last sentence (since this discussion has been Godwin'd from the start): declaring people insane and arguing that we don't have to "keep them in society" is exactly the way to the dark side, dude.
[–]labbeduddelFrankfurter Bub 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
but what discourse could be had with holocaust deniers or nazi sympathisers that is sane?
[–]sebiroth -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
but what discourse could be had with ______ that is sane?
Fill in the blank with something different. Jews, Christians, "Putinversteher", whatever you like. Maybe you get the point. The possibility of discourse will always be a good thing, if only to show that the arguments of one side are false/idiotic/"insane"/whatever.
[–]I-fuck-horses -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Strange, I didn't see them do any of that. They were just there o drink beer, not to spread their propaganda.
[–]Luett_un_Luett 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Are you serious? So we should just have a jolly good time with a leading and proven violent Nazi around? We should shut up and let the Nazi be because in this very moment he isn't smashing up someone innocent as he uses to do?
The thing about "Freedom of speech" is that it is pretty worthless as soon as you make it "Freedom of certain speech".
What are you people even talking about? The article is a about a f'cking Nazi and a brave Guy standing up against that Nazi by using his "Freedom of speech".
[–]I-fuck-horses -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
[–]plspiritBayern 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
not a crime means not a crime, no matter how far away from crime it is.
if you miss the goal by 1mm it's still not a goal
I think the country fought hard to get rid of that, to see it coming back
and that's exactly why you can't have shunning of beliefs, mob justice and free speech not applying to a subset of the population.
that is what the nazis did, what the communists did, what it's like in north korea and the islamic state today (in extreme forms) i don't want any of that, and if the price is to tolerate an intolerant asshole, so be it.
[–]alper -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
The German state intentionally reinstituted the nazis after the war. They could have also shot them all but they didn't.
[–]m4xin30n 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 1日前* (3子コメント)
Because if we do, we are just like them. Freedom and free speech has it's price.
Sooo... How do you plan to counter people who try to undermine and exploit freedom of speech? Waving your finger and saying "dudududu, dass darfst du aber nicht, du boeser Mensch?"
It is called 'civil courage', and is well in the rights of every citizen who wants to defend the basic democratic laws in Germany.
'Freedom of speach' does not mean 'Freedom to hate'.
[–]dirkt 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Zivilcourage bedeutet nicht, sich die Aufgaben der Polzei anzumaßen und anfangen, selbst Gewalt auszüben. Das ist strafbar, und zwar aus gutem Grund. Man kann ihm gerne die Meinung sagen, aber das ist auch alles. "Aus dem Biergarten rausschmeißen" kann ihn nur der Besitzer oder die Polizei, kein Möchtegern-Mob.
Ja, du kannst also nur mit dem Finger wedeln. Du kannst das laut genug tun, dass er von selbst geht, aber das ist alles.
Ich hasse Neonazis auch, aber man muss die Grundlagen unserer Gesellschaft selbst respektieren, sonst ist man wirklich nicht besser als diese Gesocks.
[–]HereForTheFish 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Und genau das ist hier doch passiert, wo liegt dein Problem?
[–]dirkt 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Dass der Vorposter behauptet hat, man müsse mehr tun.
[–]coolsubmission 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
Because if we do, we are just like them.
wtf?! Don't you relativize a bit too much? Your opinion is really "If i sit next to a violent neo-nazi and tell him that i don't like him and he should fuck off" then i'm just like him?!
[+]scorcher24Bayern (Fürth, Mittelfranken) スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 1日前 (4子コメント)
No, I am no trivializing. Quite the opposite actually. He was sitting in a public Biergarten and minding his own business. He wasn't running around in a Nazi Uniform propagating the Endlösung and Total War. Why interact at all? Just ignore and have your beer.
I am taking a problem with this whole "you can't be here" thing. Nazis are often Nazis because they don't find their place in society. With this kind of reaction we just reinforce their belief. It is actually counter-productive. And yes, we behave like them. They want all Ausländer raus because they don't like them. So if we start to throw Nazis out, then we are just as intolerant as them. Tolerance is a door that swings into both directions. Being tolerant does not mean you have to like it. So, yes we should tolerate their beliefs to a certain extent. Of course, if it becomes physical and they do harm, that is not appropriate. But sitting in a Biergarten and having a Maß is hardly offensive or a political statement.
And as I said, Ausgrenzung starts with Nazis, but where does it end? I am not defending their belief. I myself are a leftie in most topics, hell, even Die Linke is sometimes not left enough for me. So I really don't agree with NPD or AFD etc.
But I am defending their right to speak their mind and to have a beer unmolested at any time.
It is summed up in this video very well, even though it is about a whole different topic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VDbrvJ848Y
edit: Can you guys please stop down voting people that disagree or agree? Let's upvote good discussion, not opinions. Thank you.
[–]coolsubmission 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
the integration of neonazis only leads to a stronger nazi movement. That's the quintessence of the 80/90/00s. Every city which downplayed and ignored them only had a bigger problem afterwards. I don't see why it should've changed in the last years.
So if we start to throw Nazis out, then we are just as intolerant as them.
No. If we start to build industrial genocide complexes for nazis THEN we are just as intolerant as them.
[–]scorcher24Bayern (Fürth, Mittelfranken) -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Oh come the fuck on. Don't polemise what I said..
[–]coolsubmission 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
?? No you were trivializing nazi ideology. It's not a little Meinungsverschiedenheit. These are people who wants to see me dead. I can't relax and chill in a beer garden while nazis sit on the next table. And it's my right to speak my mind to them. Perhaps you had to be attacked in the past to accept that there is no flowerpower-peace-and-harmony possible with nazis.
[–]scorcher24Bayern (Fürth, Mittelfranken) -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1日前* (0子コメント)
No you were trivializing nazi ideology.
How? I didn't. This is not about if Nazis are good or bad, this is about harassment. As long as they are just sitting there and drinking beer, nobody has the right to start a mob against anyone.
Can you even see the difference? Or do you just turn on rage mode if you see someone who does not have your beliefs?
Oh and btw, I am half turkish and half italian, they want me gone too, so stop to victimize yourself. That is just awful.
And it's my right to speak my mind to them.
Yes, but just as they, you have to be respectful and respect their rights too. And that includes sitting in a Biergarten. You can ask them for a discussion, but if they want to be left alone in that moment, you have to respect that. You can't just force an interaction with you down their throats. Asking the Wirt to make them leave, is not okay. That is mobbing. But we are turning in circles here.
absolutely, vigilante justice is not good, ever. this guy, even if he's the biggest asshole in the universe, has the same right to be in that beergarden than anyone else.
and no it's not suddenly ok if the guy is a nazi a communist or a muslim
No matter how you look at it, it is discrimination of a political belief.
yes. it works both ways, with people you agree with and disagree with, and as long as nobody breaks any law, the people forming the mob are in the wrong.
that's the basis of our Rechtsstaat, the basis of democracy, the basis of freedom and liberty. We can't throw that out of the window for anyone.
[–]MartianSkyBayern -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
I agree. As long as they don't exhibit any hateful or inappropriate behaviour, language or demeanor, they should be left alone - as long as people behave like decent human beings, they should be treated accordingly. For all you know, they might be trying to get out of the scene. OTOH, in my view, brandishing any typical nazi "dress code" - combat-boots with white laces, pertinant clothing-brands, etc. makes them fair game for public shunning and pillorying because that dresscode is intended to intimidate and expose hateful political viewpoints. (especially when they appear in groups) But AFAICT this was not the case here.
[–]TotesMessenger -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1時間前* (0子コメント)
I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:
[/r/subredditdrama] A Neo Nazi sparks drama over free speech in /r/germany. I wonder who the Nazi is here. "I wonder who the Nazi is here."
[/r/subredditdrama] An article about a Neo Nazi sparks drama in /r/germany over free speech. "I wonder who the Nazi is here."
If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)
[–]Wykin 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 1日前 (18子コメント)
This harassment wasnt okay. If this Nazi does something he shouldnt do... tell the manager about it so he can get him to leave. If this Nazi does something that is against the law.. call the cops.
Just because you dont like someone for whatever reason doesnt give you the right to harass this person.
[–]ballsinyourm0uth 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
I watched the video and didn't see anything I'd call harassment, TBH
[–]Yoda_Holmes -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 1日前 (16子コメント)
He's a fucking nazi. To harass him is the least thing you should do. Nazis should not feel safe and comfortable in public. They need to feel as unpleasant as possible so they have to reconsider their pathetic life.
[–]Sarkaraq 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
So, you want to act against the Grundgesetz rights of a Nazi to defend the Grundgesetz. I wonder if that's the correct way.
[–]coolsubmission -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 21時間前 (4子コメント)
Tell me, which right does he violate or act against?
[–]Sarkaraq -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 20時間前 (3子コメント)
Art 1. Abs. 1 GG
Die Würde des Menschen ist unantastbar.
To be shouted at/the exposal to public shame qualifies in my opinion.
Art. 3 Abs. 3 GG
Niemand darf wegen [...] seiner [...] politischen Anschauungen benachteiligt oder bevorzugt werden.
That's obvious, isn't it?
Art. 11 Abs. 1 GG
Alle Deutschen genießen Freizügigkeit im ganzen Bundesgebiet.
This applies for your place of living and for your detention. Exceptions: private room/Hausrecht. That doesn't apply for Stocker, though.
[–]coolsubmission 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 20時間前 (2子コメント)
you do know that the GG limits the power of the state, not of the individual? That would be the StGB and other laws.
No. Hasselbach is a public political person. His beliefs are known. Being exposed to critics does not violate your dignity. If he feels otherwise he can press charges for e.g. § 185 StGB Beleidigung.
yeah and nobody was benachteiligt. No state-actor pressed any actions against Hasselbach for his "beliefs". If you qualify every criticism of your belief as discrimination against you, you have a really skewed view on the intentions of the GG.
Again, it's for limiting of state power, but however: He wasn't limited in his freedom of movement. He was declared persona non grata by the other guests. He could've stayed if he wanted.
By your interpretation of the GG and the application of it you can also argue that it was violated the other way round:
His beliefs are diametral to Art 1. Abs. 1+2. You want to deny the rights of the other guests:
Art. 5 (1) Jeder hat das Recht, seine Meinung in Wort, Schrift und Bild frei zu äußern und zu verbreiten
Oh Hasselbach, take note:
Art 18 Wer die Freiheit der Meinungsäußerung, insbesondere die Pressefreiheit (Artikel 5 Abs. 1), die Lehrfreiheit (Artikel 5 Abs. 3), die Versammlungsfreiheit (Artikel 8), die Vereinigungsfreiheit (Artikel 9), das Brief-, Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis (Artikel 10), das Eigentum (Artikel 14) oder das Asylrecht (Artikel 16a) zum Kampfe gegen die freiheitliche demokratische Grundordnung mißbraucht, verwirkt diese Grundrechte.
Art 18
Wer die Freiheit der Meinungsäußerung, insbesondere die Pressefreiheit (Artikel 5 Abs. 1), die Lehrfreiheit (Artikel 5 Abs. 3), die Versammlungsfreiheit (Artikel 8), die Vereinigungsfreiheit (Artikel 9), das Brief-, Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis (Artikel 10), das Eigentum (Artikel 14) oder das Asylrecht (Artikel 16a) zum Kampfe gegen die freiheitliche demokratische Grundordnung mißbraucht, verwirkt diese Grundrechte.
[–]Sarkaraq 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 17時間前* (1子コメント)
You are correct. My previous post was just stupid and the list of GG Artikeln was just a even more stupid way to save face.
I'd argue that there is some kind of moral point for the individual in the GG. However, I should've probably went with Kant instead of the GG. My bad.
Is Hasselbach really a public person? I never heard of him before and some quick research showed that there is no reason to know more about him, in my opinion. The only thing that is remarkable is that he was already a Nazi leader at age 16.
[–]coolsubmission 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
didn't expect such a reply. kudos to you.
yeah, Hasselbach is a public person. Here's the wiki page. There are already eight press articles about him as sources. If you follow the neonazi scene a little you will see his name every now and then in south germany. He's also political active in party politics?! (parteipolitisch) as he is currently Regional Chairman (Landesvorsitzender) of the party Die Rechte
[–]Wykin 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (8子コメント)
And what would the nazis do if the roles would be the opposite. Exactly what he did or worse. I actually want to be better then a nazi.
Its the same with religious people. Let them be as long as they act within the law and it doesnt hurts others it needs to be tolerated. In the end racism is kind of a religion.. a believe. And yes racism does hurt people but so do religious extremists. So in the end we shall only judge the individual person for what the person does and not for what others with the same believe do.
[+]coolsubmission スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント 1日前 (7子コメント)
Did they wanted to kill him? No? Congratulations! They are better than Nazis. Really, what you are demanding is that no one is allowed to tell nazis their opinion. Freedom of speech goes both ways.
[–]I_Clean_HereHessen 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (6子コメント)
Did they wanted to kill him? No? Congratulations! They are better than Nazis.
Stop using the same dumb rhetoric nazis use. Overexaggeration! Strawman arguments! Unfounded accusations (the nazis in this case weren't about to kill anyone)! Yay!
Be better. Come on.
[–]coolsubmission -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 1日前 (5子コメント)
It's in their ideology. According to their beliefs probably 10+% of the other people in the beer garden should be killed. They don't act on it because they aren't strong enough to do it against the other people and the state.
[–]I_Clean_HereHessen 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 21時間前 (4子コメント)
You're a lost cause. Grow up.
[–]coolsubmission -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 21時間前 (3子コメント)
du mich auch.
[–]I_Clean_HereHessen -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 21時間前 (2子コメント)
Look who chooses to use insults. It's not me. That's a hint.
[–]coolsubmission 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 21時間前 (1子コメント)
erm.. where do i use insults?
[–]Paedda -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Oh? And maybe leftist extremists should not feel safe and comfortable either. On second thought, I think Islamists are pretty much against the constitution, too. And maybe Jews? Well, I don't think they are a problem now, but there was a time when everybody just knew Jews were the problem and should absolutely not "feel safe and comfortable" in public.
Who the hell are you to say to whom the freedom of our constitution applies to and to whom it doesn't?
[–]jagermo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
If you think back, the Nazi movement formed within beer pubs (cellars) in Munich. Based on that alone I think we should be more vigilant than other cities. Good work.
[+]I-fuck-horses スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
What an amazingly stupid comment, you dimwit. If you only prevent Nazis from going to Biergartens then you prevent Naziism!
[–]jagermo 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
First of all, nice tone you have there. Do you fuck your horses with that mouth?
Second: If you read my comment, I said we have to be vigilant against these kinds of things. I meant Germany as a country, but especially in Munich, since we know what happens, if you let these people have their way because you don't say anything when they start to group together.
You might want to read these things here: Beer Hall Putsch and/or this
I might not have been at that Beergarden. But if some fuckwits think they can re-live their historic fantasies in my city, I say go to hell.
.
[–]ArancaytarBerlin 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
You know, it's pretty iffy to have a list of people who are categorically forbidden to be seen in public - not just when representing a group or behaving in a particular way, but ever.
[–]LukasBoersma 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
The thing is: Nazis believe they are speaking for the majority of Germans. They think they are the ones who are bold enough to speak up against the foreign-controlled government, and that everybody else is just too afraid of repressions to support them.
Showing them that the vast majority of people is not on their side is very important. These assholes have to know they are not speaking for the people.
[–]Paedda 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
I'm not comfortable with all these people (and media) appointing themselves the judges of Neonazis, just because. And on top of that, the beergarden is probably evil now by association and may await leftist "retaliation" or something. Hopefully it won't go that far.
Please, please advocate, protest, discuss, stand up against Nazi worldviews, opinions, policies, but do not condemn the person unless for specific crimes he has been convicted of. Otherwise you are doing what looks pretty suspiciously like the Nazis were doing themselves: Outlawing people for their political opinion, however extreme.
[–]Steppdeckenwolf 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 23時間前 (1子コメント)
do not condemn the person unless for specific crimes he has been convicted of
The man in question has been convicted multiple times. Watching the video made me very uncomfortable, too, though.
[–]Wykin 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 15時間前 (0子コメント)
When he was convicted he had to deal with the consequences. If you dont like those consequences, you are not happy with the law in Germany.
If so you got 3 options: 1. Do your part to get the law to change (a legal way of course) 2. Dont do anything and suck it up 3. Leave the country
[–]RedditForFreeSpeech -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
Doesn't the "Neo-Nazi" have the right to a meal with friends? I don't find this to be very courageous, considering that 90% of Germans don't like this guy. Seems like bullying
[–]audaxxx 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 22時間前 (2子コメント)
Show your support and give that Nazi a hug.
[–]RedditForFreeSpeech 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 13時間前 (1子コメント)
So intolerant, you are a bigger hater than this guy who was cajoled out of the biergarten
[–]audaxxx 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
I do not tolerante Nazis, if that means that I am worse than Hitler, so be it. I can live with that.
[+]Uskoton スコアが基準値未満のコメント-34ポイント-33ポイント-32ポイント 1日前 (13子コメント)
Give it a year and Germany will ban the Beer Festival to keep all the 'immigrants' happy anyway
[–]LaoBaNetherlands 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
Actually they have Oktoberfest (with beer) in Turkey now.
[–]Uskoton 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
That's ace!
[–]LaoBaNetherlands -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
Not that there aren't people protesting against it in Turkey as it being incompatible with their culture.
[–]inakzeptabelSchleswig-Holstein 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 1日前 (9子コメント)
Nope, find something new to make refugees look bad..
Or better yet, realize that they're not
[+]Uskoton スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14ポイント-13ポイント-12ポイント 1日前 (8子コメント)
So closing University sports halls to house them and advising women how to dress who live close to these 'refugees' is ok in free Germany?
[–]HokusSchmokus 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
Yes imo it is ok to close sports halls to house them. That this only(or mostly) is done in the summer breaks and the like helps though. At least that's how it is in NRW.
Do you have sources for the latter? I am asking because until last month the go-to anti immigrant to say was that they rape "our women", pointing to the alledged rape in Freital, which has now turned out to be a lie.
Please note that I am not writing this to critique you. You seem to have an anti immigrant opinion (which does not make anyone a Nazi, dear fellow commenters)and I am sure you have your reasons for that. I am just asking you to elaborate further on those
[–]Uskoton -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
I appreciate the mature response. If they are only closed during the summer breaks, sure. However the person who posted the story (German guy from Dresden Uni) explained that "all sports facilities closed and sports related courses stopped" which would obviously be outrageous to even think about! As for the other topic.. let me find the article again
[–]HokusSchmokus 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 1日前 (1子コメント)
Well I am an adult, and I usually presume the same about my discussion partners. As such, there is always the possibility to respectfully disagree. For example, even if a Uni's sport facilities were closed down permanently to house asylum seekers, I still think that's a reasonable thing to do. But then again, I am hugely biased pro-asylum because I would not even be alive if the rest of the world had refused German Asylum seekers post WW 2. (Also my pro stance is solely for actual asylum cases, not economical refugees)
[–]Uskoton -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
I think a lot of the issues stem from that one problem. Actual aslyum vs Economical. I'm all for helping people who need the help.
[–]inakzeptabelSchleswig-Holstein 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1日前 (3子コメント)
Jetzt komm nicht an mit 'free germany', hirntoter nazi
[+]Uskoton スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 1日前 (2子コメント)
So you resort to the typical Nazi insults. Very good. "I am right. Anybody else is a Nazi" wait, what year is it again? Anyway not wasting anymore of my time.
[–]Steppdeckenwolf 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 22時間前 (0子コメント)
You're regularly detailing your apocalyptic fantasies of how there'll soon be "no Europeans left" because we're getting oh so overrun - of course specifically in the context of African and Arab people, not immigrants in general. You seem very worried about not everyone around you being white and it seems you want to preserve some kind of status quo ethnic mix in Europe. If that doesn't sound racist to you, you need to look up definitions.
Take another exemplary gem from your posting history:
Who cares? Denmark is Denmark. Free to makes its own laws. If minorities don't like it then they can always go to somewhere they'll be in the majority and enjoy their lives there.
It seems that in your world, someone cannot be Danish and belong to a minority at the same time. And either way, they better not expect to have any say in the legislation (even though they may be Danish citizens and have lived there all their lives). Most importantly, you seem to be ignorant that precisely this stance of yours is in conflict with human rights and a fundamental principle of democracy. Majority decisions cannot be used to discriminate against any societal group. Yet you request that "minorities" in Denmark get no say in the democratic process. Defining some majority in-group and attempting to cut the rights of any other out group, is a core principle of fascism.
You can take issue with being called a Nazi, and most likely you're not quite there yet on your journey down the right wing rabbit hole. But you have a promising mix of racist and fascist ideology in your posts, and spending some more time in the echo chamber that is /r/european, you might just get there.
[–]inakzeptabelSchleswig-Holstein -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 1日前 (0子コメント)
same, go die
π Rendered by PID 3981 on app-108 at 2015-08-14 15:00:54.944652+00:00 running 76a938d country code: JP.
[–]VaikEurope 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]new_DooM_Vet 21ポイント22ポイント23ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]ballsinyourm0uth 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]I-fuck-horses 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]new_DooM_Vet 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Bristlerider 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]new_DooM_Vet 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (5子コメント)
[+]coolsubmission スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]new_DooM_Vet 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]new_DooM_Vet 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Bristlerider 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]jagermo 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]xkcd_transcriber 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]scorcher24Bayern (Fürth, Mittelfranken) 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント (116子コメント)
[–]cyberdork 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント (26子コメント)
[–]Paedda 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]ballsinyourm0uth -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Paedda -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (20子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (17子コメント)
[–]I-fuck-horses -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]alayne_ 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Sarkaraq スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]audaxxx 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]audaxxx 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]I-fuck-horses スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]audaxxx 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Arvendilin 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Luett_un_Luett 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]I-fuck-horses -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]audaxxx 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]tmaster7331World 32ポイント33ポイント34ポイント (26子コメント)
[–]alper 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]tmaster7331World 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]alper 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]tmaster7331World 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Arvendilin 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]dexter_sinisterUSA 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]Luett_un_Luett 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]Mr_C_Baxter 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]plspiritBayern 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Luett_un_Luett 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]I-fuck-horses -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Thaddelᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Mr_C_Baxter -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Thaddelᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Mr_C_Baxter 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Thaddelᕙ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ᕗ 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (1子コメント)
[+]ThirdMostAverage スコアが基準値未満のコメント-7ポイント-6ポイント-5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]alper -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]LawL4EverGermany 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]plspiritBayern 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]tmaster7331World 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]plspiritBayern -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]I-fuck-horses 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]tmaster7331World -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]hondaaccords -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (23子コメント)
[+]Sarkaraq スコアが基準値未満のコメント-8ポイント-7ポイント-6ポイント (22子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (14子コメント)
[+]Sarkaraq スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]elgubbo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]audaxxx 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ballsinyourm0uth 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]ballsinyourm0uth 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]HereForTheFish 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]VARNUK 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]I-fuck-horses -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RobbyLee 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]RobbyLee 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]RobbyLee 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]audaxxx 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]eean 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]scorcher24Bayern (Fürth, Mittelfranken) -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]eean 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]labbeduddelFrankfurter Bub 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]dirkt 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]dirkt 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sebiroth 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]labbeduddelFrankfurter Bub 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]sebiroth -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]labbeduddelFrankfurter Bub 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]sebiroth -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]I-fuck-horses -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Luett_un_Luett 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]I-fuck-horses -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]plspiritBayern 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]alper -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]m4xin30n 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]dirkt 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]HereForTheFish 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]dirkt 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (5子コメント)
[+]scorcher24Bayern (Fürth, Mittelfranken) スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]scorcher24Bayern (Fürth, Mittelfranken) -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]scorcher24Bayern (Fürth, Mittelfranken) -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]plspiritBayern 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MartianSkyBayern -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TotesMessenger -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Wykin 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]ballsinyourm0uth 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Yoda_Holmes -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Sarkaraq 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Wykin 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (8子コメント)
[+]coolsubmission スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]I_Clean_HereHessen 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]I_Clean_HereHessen 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]I_Clean_HereHessen -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]coolsubmission 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Paedda -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]jagermo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[+]I-fuck-horses スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]jagermo 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ArancaytarBerlin 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]LukasBoersma 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Paedda 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Steppdeckenwolf 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Wykin 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RedditForFreeSpeech -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]audaxxx 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]RedditForFreeSpeech 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]audaxxx 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Uskoton スコアが基準値未満のコメント-34ポイント-33ポイント-32ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]LaoBaNetherlands 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Uskoton 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]LaoBaNetherlands -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]inakzeptabelSchleswig-Holstein 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (9子コメント)
[+]Uskoton スコアが基準値未満のコメント-14ポイント-13ポイント-12ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]HokusSchmokus 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Uskoton -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]HokusSchmokus 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Uskoton -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]inakzeptabelSchleswig-Holstein 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (3子コメント)
[+]Uskoton スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Steppdeckenwolf 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]inakzeptabelSchleswig-Holstein -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (0子コメント)