全 119 件のコメント

[–]SpawnPointGuard 152ポイント153ポイント  (6子コメント)

If it's GG or at all gaming related then I'm fine with it. If it's something like Clinton's email scandal or Trump's immigration policy then it has no business being here.

[–]mgod19http://i.imgur.com/nigrDxc.jpg 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

As an American the less shit about the election I see here the better. I think most of it is pretty irrelevant to this sub, even the ones involving socjus issues and whatnot.

[–]MonkeyFries 33ポイント34ポイント  (2子コメント)

Agreed. As a non American I can read /r/news to see the latest ridiculous thing trump has said.

[–]MrRexels 24ポイント25ポイント  (1子コメント)

I concur, as another non-American I can always check the rest of reddit if I want to engage in Sandersjerking.

[–]RedStarDawnAsk me about #GGinRVA - 28 August 2015! 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I might include Social Justice related posts, as Trump seems to piss off the SJWs all the time.

[–]Asha108 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Which is the purpose of subreddits and rules for relevancy.

[–]burnercomenter1000 comment get on Rule Megathread 42ポイント43ポイント  (35子コメント)

Needs to be related to nerd culture, or needs to be gamedropping gamergate, and needs to be explained why it is related to gamergate. The new people probably aren't aware of the nerd culture requirements. Respectful peace should be maintained as to not come off as partisan but let them defend their thesis and gave them a chance to explain their reasoning.

[–]Piroko -3ポイント-2ポイント  (34子コメント)

Trump gamedropped in a positive way.

People are just mad that Sanders hasn't given them anything to post about.

[–]plasmacutter 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Actually, Sanders did give them something to post about.

SJW's have been shutting down his stump speeches, and he's had the patience of a saint with them. It has shown up here under the SOCJUS tag.

In other words, the bleed-through has been pretty even from both partisan sides of the campaign so far.

[–]cha0stat tvam asi 31ポイント32ポイント  (27子コメント)

This is exactly the kind of divisiveness that we see as a potential problem.

[–]Meowsticgoesnya0018-1877-0794 3DS Friend code, remember to give me yours 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Trump didn't do anything like that, he just reposted a postive thing someone said of him, who just happened to have GG in their name. Not even the word gamergate, they just had GG in their name. (Although said person was a gamergate supporter, I doubt Trump even knew that).

[–]RavenscroftRaven 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

People are just mad that Sanders hasn't given them anything to post about.

The partisanism, YOUR partisanism, amongst others, is the problem, not what either one is saying themselves. It is what you're saying. Trump did something? Cool, note it. Sanders did something? Cool, note it. Don't whip out cocks and start comparing sizes of your political opponents in a place not meant for such.

[–]theone89944k and /r/Gawker GET 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Trump did not gamedrop. He re-tweeted some random GG account which jerked off Trump. He doesn't know what GG is and he doesn't care.

[–]brody3060 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Not to mention commisar is a satirist I thought he was being sarcastic until everyone started running with it tbh

[–]frankenmine/r/WerthamInAction - #ComicGate 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's a satirist in general, but he's also hardcore anti-SJW, and it's reasonable to assume that his support for Trump would be genuine on that basis.

[–]solid_razorbill 13ポイント14ポイント  (1子コメント)

What about Filipino politics?

[–]Vukith 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wish I could give you more upvotes for this.

[–]shemmie 28ポイント29ポイント  (1子コメント)

Trump RTing a GGer wasn't political. Because Trump probably has no fucking clue what GG is, nor will he ever likely care.

It was just a funny "Famous person RTed a GGer" thing.

The end?

And so to further that, I'd like to see as much GG / US election cross over in KiA as I did with GG / UK election crossover.

In as much as, fucking none - as one's about who'll lead a country after an election, and the other's GamerGate.

Unless - unless - UNLESS - for some fucking insane reason, a potentially future President of the USA actually wades into GamerGate as a topic.

Then all bets are off.

[–]SomeThrowAwayForKiA 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fully agree with this. Keep the partisan shit out of it.

Politics are the D&C shills' wet dream. Don't give it to them on a silver platter.

[–]g-divA nice grandson 66ポイント67ポイント  (3子コメント)

If it's directly relevant to GG, I don't see an issue.

But honestly, there's been a ton of primarily political, barely GG related posts that I've rolled my eyes at. Would love to see KiA remain primarily apolitical in the sense of "picking sides" or having discussions devolve into petty presidential election squabbles. Moving the more political less GG related posts to /KiAPolitics seems like a good solution.

[–]Runsta 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Even if it is tangentially relevant, such as an issue of free speech, the press that has slandered us for the past year slandering someone else, or something to that extent i'm fine with it here. I'm not sure where to draw the line though and I don't envy the task.

[–]TheWheatOne 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Doesn't even need to be political, I've seen posts here that basically have nothing to do with GG. Mods get yelled at if they are deleted though, so basically they have their hands tied.

[–]JesusPimpHand -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ron Paul 2014

Statist mods removin' my super important super relevant ideas. Fuckin'... fascist statists, 1984ing me.

[–]13thmeerkat 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

Needs to be related to gamergate/gaming and a self-post with a bit of explanation. If not this subreddit will be flooded with posts every time a candidate makes a stupid remark.

[–]AlseidesDD 21ポイント22ポイント  (0子コメント)

One needs to be mindful that a significant portion of KiA, and to an extend the rest of the GG movement, are not American.

Thus I hope others would consider why there needs to be election generated political discussion to come up unless there's relevance to GG itself.

[–]GOU_NoMoreMrNiceGuy 12ポイント13ポイント  (2子コメント)

it should follow the same guidelines we've established - if it's about SJW rad fem fuckery culture war and games / games journalism then it belongs.

but imo, something should only be booted if it doesn't even make any attempt to link it to GG. if the post somehow links it to GG's interests, it should stay because there are a lot of things that indirectly affect us.

but if it's literally just about benghazi, why is it here?

[–]RavenscroftRaven 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Downvote it, don't contribute in it, and move on. We don't need bannings to regulate content.

[–]plasmacutter 14ポイント15ポイント  (2子コメント)

Anything associated with ethics, socjus, gaming, or GG should be fine here.

If it strays beyond that, into the trash it goes.

In other words, I vote for a combination of proposals 3 and 4.

The only places i've seen the election come up with any strength so far:

  • when "#blacklivesmatter" SOCJUS cultists stormed and shut down Sanders' stump speeches in the past week or so. (widespread approval of his infinite patience)

  • when "the Trump" shut down Fox's attempt to socjus-shame him in Sargon's debate stream, then re-tweeted a GG account last week. (widespread approval of his shitlording)

These were both firmly related to GG and socjus censorship/shaming campaigns and made sense.

Anything beyond this level of intersection with this sub's topics should not be here.

It's one thing to sit back and comment on politician behavior when it intersects with the interests of this sub, but we should avoid going any further than that, this includes AVOIDING creating a "kiapolitics", as my biggest nightmare is a sub like that somehow pushing a "consensus endorsement by GG".

[–]HandofBaneShitposter Extraordinaire 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

The only places i've seen the election come up with any strength so far: when "#blacklivesmatter" SOCJUS cultists stormed and shut down Sanders' stump speeches in the past week or so. (widespread approval of his infinite patience) when "the Trump" shut down Fox's attempt to socjus-shame him in Sargon's debate stream, then re-tweeted a GG account last week. (widespread approval of his shitlording)

I just want to point out, from a moderation perspective - the reason you haven't seen that much so far is because til this point, we have been treating political threads about any of the candidates as if they were Misc/Socjus posts of an extreme off topic nature. I can show you an inbox full of bitching about having removed several Sanders related posts as evidence of that.

Users currently do not make much, if any, attempt to link said political posts to GG/KiA beyond "well this is tangentially something SJW-related, so therefore it belongs!!" That kind of response has been treated, at least by myself, as zero-effort to show the connection.

[–]plasmacutter 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think it's the correct approach.

So far, those posts which have made it to the sub have belonged here. I think the current standards should continue.

[–]gargantualis 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'd like to add to that. As we may have seen, there have been worse spergfights in the history of gamergate, but at the end of the day we are all still gamers, or at least sympathetic interested in preserving free expression, there are many principles which unite us.

Its like Louis Le Vau said in one of his videos, his politics, his way of perceiving the world, his personal philosophy all of those things have changed or evolved over time.

But he like many of us have ALWAYS been gamers.

So....no matter what happens...settle your differences, agree to disagree. If you feel you can only work mutually at a distance, then fine.

Be patient. Do NOT let these seeds of political division take root. Its like reprogramming a terminator into reclassifying a friendly as a prime target.

The trick is to spread confusion make it so that no one can come to sensible conclusion about goings on, or sociopolitical parasites In the interest of defending their past times, their shared experiences, their choice of entertainment, subcultures, memes and chosen self identity.

Because some people are going to keep using stuff like this, to purge through our apathy until they find a crack, or excuse to rally folks. Remember the other friends online some of you may have lost over this whole political media frenzy, and those you have made.

No matter what happens.... hold the line.

Hold the line.

[–]ShadistsReddit 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I need to see this done with you in some form of armor holding a sword while the sun rises behind you before leading the forces down the hill to the waiting hordes.

[–]RavenscroftRaven 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Holding, sir, yes, sir! I'm inspired. Are you inspired? I'm inspired.

[–]Agkistro13 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Whatever rules there are, we need to make sure they don't head off the possibility of active political engagement, as opposed to observation. So for example, if a candidate says something awful about video games or something wonderful about SJW's, it might be come in our best interest to hijack their hashtag or otherwise try to get a response or some recognition. I don't want such efforts of organization to be headed off because of some rule. Tie ins to political issues are also potentially great ways to get KIA on the front page and get more people into GG.

[–]HexezWork 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

If the politics have nothing to do with nerd culture and/or corruption with journalists it should not be posted here.

I get enough Bernie and Trump circlejerk on the reddit frontpage I don't wanna see that shit spilling into here unless you can make a case for why its related to GG in your post.

[–]Thegreatbear21 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

politics will kill gg that simple once you pick a side the other side is the one your fighting thats how it works

[–]GOU_NoMoreMrNiceGuy 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

i disagree. i'm a lib and i KNOW there are plenty of conservatives here but whenever their political allegiance shows up, i just ignore it.

because as i always say, "the enemy of my enemy".... and for sure as fuck the radfemsjw nutjobs are my enemy.

[–]crystalflash 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've said it before, but i feel that discussing politics here should be done as objectively as possible. That said, an individual's bias will show through occasionally, and we need to respect that person's political beliefs. We're all individuals with our own set of personal beliefs outside Gamergate, and our unity despite our differences has been a major strength of ours. It's a shame that US politics can be so destructive, but so long as we can establish that we all have our own opinions in regards to US politics and "agree to disagree" on certain political topics, discussing politics on KiA should go fine. That said, I think we should implement the flair idea first and see how things play out before making a whole new subreddit.

[–]White_Phoenix 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I only care when it's related to censorship and political correctness. As much as I hate Trump, he's the only one who's basically being a misanthrope to everyone and talking about how silly political correctness is, because fuck you he has money.

That's the only reason why I even mention him, because he's causing butthurt for EVERYONE, including the Republicans. If another politician comes up and mentions how social justice and/or feminism and/or political correctness is fucking with our civil liberties, then I'm more than happy for it to be featured here. Or if they gamedrop in a positive way, regardless of the candidate.

Otherwise - any other policy? Keep that shit out of here.

[–]augmentedwangs 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I am in favor of 2 and 3. The political noise that happens isn't even important to most Americans, more people shouldn't be forced through such nationalistic bullshit.

In the past there have been other topics, especially around when FPH was removed, that outsiders started posting about that were only microscopically framed as being GG related because of censorship or somewhat but were championed as the stance of KiA. National politics are an even grimier subject that would attract unsavory types and I don't like seeing things as silly as party lines infiltrate this sub to divide us.

[–]Funkgalaxy 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not trying to tell everyone else how to live their lives but if KotakuInAction becomes some campaign hub I'm probably going to tune out till after the election.

Honestly I think it would kill the subreddit, but what do I know?

[–]throwaway_6787 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Everybody outside of America couldn't give a shit about your dumb arse president. GG is a GAMER revolt about GAMING journalism. By discussing Trump your're giving the enemy exactly what they want, to turn GG into a political entity which we are not.

[–]jammer170 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree with the idea of a "politics" flair, but it might also be a good idea to have a separate "US election" flair. There are politics that actually seriously effect GamerGate, whereas the election is something many people are interested in, but will have actual limited impact.

[–]ShadistsReddit 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd like to see the same system used for SJW posts, self posts with an explanation as to how it's relevant (I am very in favor of this in general) with a side of "go to KiAPolitics" upon removal if it's too far afield to fit here.

But then I've been told that I'm a super secret authoritarian SJW shill so disregard. :)

[–]shillingintensify 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't want politics beyond SJWs being retarded in gaming on KiA.

[–]DelAvaria30FPS triggers me 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well I think people are going to want to discuss certain things about it. GG as a whole will probably still be apolitical but I could obviously see certain political canidates making social justice/feminism a core part of their campaign platform. That said, the new sub might work but the problem is the amount of overlap.

Is Doanld Trump mentioning something on twitter about blocking people GG related? I would say yes, relevant. However, others will say it is more political than gamergate related and use that as a reason to not want it here.

The problem is there will be a greyscale of where a particular headline might fall. It is difficult to label something as "politics" therefore it does not belong because many front page posts in the last year could loosely fall under that.

Therefore I am against removing posts based on a "politics" category. I think having a flair on it and being able to sort it off should be enough.

[–]BaddoSpirito 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hmm this is indeed a tough question. As someone who thinks banning certain topics should be a last resort, I would prefer either doing nothing or politics flair. I might change my stance if the sub gets too overwhelmed with political posts but I haven't seen that happen yet.

What we absolutely must not do imo is organize a political GG operation. It is fine to discuss and argue without cluttering the sub too much but it is absolutely not fine to support or attack a certain candidate in an organized manner.

[–]randomname19029 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

As a left-wing European, this stuff is obnoxious as fuck. I vote for moving out US presidential stuff as off-topic unless directly related to gaming or online censorship.

[–]kaeim 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank christ someone finally said what I've been thinking. As a brit-fag I've been feeling bewildered by these political arguments, so let's back to the real work

[–]EliteFourScott 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

As long as this isn't used as an excuse to remove "culture war" topics that are and always have been and always will be relevant to Gamergate, I'm cool with it. i'd really hate for the '16 election leadup to be the downfall of Gamergate.

[–]princess_y_fronts 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

I am not an american so for me, the american elections are like a really long episode of the daily show.

[–]brody3060 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

IMO we may aswell be talking about the political climate of a certain chain of islands in south east Asia.

[–]bobcat/r/AfterlifeEmpire 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Only Gamergate kids will get this reference.

[–]IAMPOUNDCAKEIs also 0.453592 kilogramcake 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

[–]Wraith978 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Canadian (though I follow US politics relatively closely) I think we should allow it with a tag.

I know it's divisive and people hate it (the two party system encourages some outrageous tribalism) - i do as well, but it's important to talk about among people that hold different views and I think we usually try to keep civil here. A large group of people talking civilly can get to interesting conclusions.

One of the things I love about GG is I follow some right wing people that make me rethink my views (though not usually change them) on issues and we try to talk it out rationally, and hopefully that's gone the other way a too.

This may be unpopular with a lot of GG folks that want to keep a narrower focus, but hopefully you see where I'm coming from.

[–]Tarrock 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

You gotta remember that the whole bernie sanders blacklifesmatter circus that happened the other day, those are the type of people you'd see on social media screaming that GG is misogynist, and zoe quinn is the virgin mary.

[–]theone89944k and /r/Gawker GET 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

We DON'T need a flair; and remember that this election shit is only relegated to US, not non-US Gamer-Gaters.

Politics doesn't belong on this sub.

[–]mnemosyne-0000#BotYourShield / https://i.imgur.com/6X3KtgD.jpg 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Archive links for this post:


I am Mnemosyne, goddess of memory. I remember so you don't have to.

[–]unprivilegedminority 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think a combination of 2 and 3 would work best for the sub, but if there is something actually related to GG, it could be ok to post it here for discussion.

[–]ThatFacelessMan 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Can we take a minute to just appreciate the fact that we're diverse enough to actually have a problem? When it comes down to it we're all gamers here, regardless of the other facets of our lives that make us who we are, especially political leanings.

That being said, I'm for a Politics flair, as long as it's tangential to GG.

[–]johnyann 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah lets let give Bernie Sanders' campaign another place to astroturf the fuck out of.

[–]Feel_Free_To_Downvot 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

if shit is pure political and has no connection with gg, ethics, gaming and censorship then remove post and offer to the author to post on /r/KiaPolitics ?

[–]HBlight 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've stomached Escape Velocity for a year. I think I can make it through this.

[–]HolyThirteenRule34K get! 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'll trust Supernova's judgement on this one, I would be SHOCKED if there was something even vaguely on-topic coming out of this election. I'm all for peripheral politics bullshit usually... just not quite this much. :)

The hissy-fits thrown over this by a couple of people (who are likely far too burnt out to begin with) are frustrating, so I hope everybody is prepared for the kids who are gonna keep derailing things with election crap.

Its been shown to be effective for dividing us, expect more of it.

[–]Taylor7500 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think anything to keep it apparent that it's political would be good, but perhaps a good suggestion would be to keep it relevant (no politics posts which have very little to do with us), and maybe avoid opinions about who is good to support. My suggestion would be that links about real, relevant events should be fine, but opinion pieces on why one candidate is better than another shouldn't be.

[–]FoolsErrend 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Please keep Politics OUT of KIA.

There are strong advocates of KIA where I 100% disagree with their political position. KIA is about ethics, consumer rights, etc- Politics can bring a very negative spin into our discussions.

Please lets agree to disagree on politics and keep it out of here.

[–]CrazyInAnInsaneWorld 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

As much as I dislike the idea of bringing politics unrelated to GG into KiA, the fact remains that not only is the term "Politics" so greyscale that it's difficult to tell where the related ends and the unrelated begins, I think we would do more damage, in the long run, by quashing political discussion.

As an entity, KiA is, and should remain, officially neutral, even if it's members do tend to lean one way or the other. This hooks back into establishment of a certain opinion, and why it is so bad for a community that highly values the concept of Freedom of Speech. Any political opinions held by members, are their own opinions alone, and should expect to have to defend those opinions using facts and logic. The Market of Ideas only works when outmoded and obsolete ideologies are cycled out of the market by more innovative and successful ones, after all.

[–]handrubber -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

CAN'T STUMP THE TRUMP

[–]Angle_of_the_Dangle 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

My votes:

  • No new flair

  • No discussion of the election season, candidates and policies unless it is somehow related to #gg. The topic is not relevant, it is very divisive and a significant portion of KiA is not from the US.

  • Deleted posts are directed to r/kiapolitics.

[–]Wolphoenix 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Can we at least get a Dr. Doom/Sideshow Bob 2016 banner?

[–]Binturung 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

All hope lies in Doom.

[–]IAmSupernovaCosmic Overlord - @SupaNovaKiA[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes.

[–]DeathBattleFan1238===D 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If somebody is just in here campaigning, sure, block their posts. But if it's even remotely discussing media ethics, censorship, collusion, etc, then let the votes decide relevance.

[–]todiwan 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

Shows just how different post-Hat KIA is. Mods ACTUALLY taking user input and, I presume, taking it into consideration instead of ignoring it. You're doing a really good job earning back the users' trust, I think.

[–]kamon123 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (6子コメント)

Read the comments. That's exactly what they are doing so I don't get your sarcasm. This post was after a user already made a post close to this and everyone agreed. Keep the presidential debate out of this unless it connects to sjws or gamergate.

[–]todiwan 1ポイント2ポイント  (5子コメント)

??????????????????????????

What fucking sarcasm? Did I miss something? I'm so confused.

[–]kamon123 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

My apologies. I misread your comment. Commence the downvotes. I'll start it.

[–]todiwan 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

I have no idea how you could have possibly concluded that it was sarcasm, lmao. What gave you the idea?

[–]kamon123 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

I drunkenly misread it and at this point don't remember how. My apologies. I misread shit when drunk and make an ass of myself.

[–]todiwan 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I don't mind, I'm just curious. It didn't look like sarcasm at all, I think.

[–]kamon123 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It didn't trust me. I'm just an idiot who apparently scan reads when drunk. Again. I'm just an idiot. If I didn't hate reddits admins I'd give you gold as an apology for how stupid I was and how confused I've made you. I feel like a grade a jackass.

[–]BrimshaeSun Tzu VII:35 / Survived #GGinDC 2015 / Dined #GGinNC 2015 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You should uh, you should put asterisks before the options. It makes them stand out more.

[–]kvxdev 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

As someone who was heavily downvoted for a political opinion emitted in reply earlier?

-Not doing anything and trusting that the votes and topic discussions will be handled accordingly.

or

-Adding a flair for "POLITICS" and requiring the self post feature in order to give readers more insight into why a particular post would be relevant here.

[–]RavenscroftRaven 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I encourage people to downvote whenever possible anything that seems egregiously off-topic, even if it is something you agree with politically, if it does not belong here in discourse.

I don't want to put more effort on the mod team, because I don't like censorship of an authoritarian nature, and technically, it is such. So instead, I ask people don't make them in the first place. If it's linked, it's linked. But even then, Americanos love their politics like they hate quality beer, so it had best be really linked to make up for the inevitable pissing contest.

When Argentina has its elections, I'll make sure to flood the board, so they don't feel left out, either.

[–]frankenmine/r/WerthamInAction - #ComicGate -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

GamerGate necessarily has a political side, has had one since Literally Who bought herself a Rep. So some political content should be allowed. But we shouldn't officially endorse any presidential candidate, which will both push people out and go against our principle of not having leaders.

A POLITICS flair seems like a good idea.

[–]Romney2008button masher -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you're not going to to outright delete them then just move them to the Kia politics sub.

[–]IAMPOUNDCAKEIs also 0.453592 kilogramcake -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have long been a proponent of splitting off the more 'off topic' posts to their own sub. Though I understand that i am a minority in that regard.

Also, shouldn't your flair be 'Nova Prime' rather than Commander Nova? :P

[–]Ricwulf -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

That being said, the reason for this post is to ask you all how you feel about these issues rising up on KiA.

Adopt a rule akin to TiA, where basically politics isn't forbidden, just frowned upon. Try to keep it to a minimum, unless it is directly related to us.

EDIT: Apparently my idea isn't too popular. Anyone want to explain why?

[–]LeerooooyGaaaankins -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Let the votes decide, and use a flair so it can be filtered out.

As an aside, thank you for consulting the community before implementing policies instead of after it simultaneously. It gives me new hope for the mod team.

[–]totlmstrBanned for triggering reddit's advertisers -5ポイント-4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just wanted to say great work to you moderators!

[THIS POST HAS BEEN EDITED TO FIT THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBREDDIT. USER HAS BEEN BANNED FOR TRIGGERING.]

[–]ElzevirAuxiliatrix -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I have the solution to ALL of your problems. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4d_FvgQ1csE