4330
4331

This keeps getting weirder (i.imgur.com)

PussyWhistle が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]scumbag-reddit 825ポイント826ポイント  (138子コメント)

They're all funbois

[–]xsoulfoodx 713ポイント714ポイント  (131子コメント)

Ladyboys. Guys with tits. Chicks with dicks.

[–]smithee2001 119ポイント120ポイント  (11子コメント)

One ladyboy, two moneyboys.

[–]CosbyTeamTriosby 18ポイント19ポイント  (8子コメント)

moneyboy? Like from the gameshow?

[–]steaktruck 36ポイント37ポイント  (7子コメント)

the fuck are all these names

[–]thekidchew 17ポイント18ポイント  (5子コメント)

I dunno man but if youre ever in Thailand its a safe bet to not have sex with strangers, unless you know that's your thing

[–]SgtSlaughterEX 24ポイント25ポイント  (1子コメント)

http://41.media.tumblr.com/a9524e5647a9645792dbea36c5163737/tumblr_mq5zpmfyq01sqx2nvo1_1280.jpg

[–]ars_x_machina 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is actually a new boyscout medal. You win it by non-participation.

And, before anyone goes there... boiscout as well.

[–]untrustableskeptic 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Fourteen year old prostitutes and chicks with dicks. If you take a vacation to Thailand we all know.

[–]ShaneDAWS0N 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well how else would you know though, if that's your thing?

[–]PacificRimming 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ladyboy or Ladyboi is basically a guy w had a gender change, some, SOME of them are pretty, not going to lie

Moneyboy or Moneyboi sometimes refers to a Sugar Daddy or boyfriend maybe even a pimp or customer(prostitution). basically anyone willing to spending money on said Ladyboy

[–]SynthPrax 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't... what? Nevermind. Stop.

[–]i_admit_everything 369ポイント370ポイント  (62子コメント)

There are no chicks with dicks, only guys with tits!

[–]Ibarra08 73ポイント74ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dammit Ted!

[–]Devanismyname 62ポイント63ポイント  (15子コメント)

I prefer chicks with dicks. Makes it less gay for me when I jerk off to shemale porn.

[–]Smailien 31ポイント32ポイント  (7子コメント)

It's all about minimizing shame!

[–]gormster 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Gay men don't jerk it to shemale porn. Source: gay man. Also Dan Savage who is more of an authority of the subject than me.

[–]dirty_porn 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

jerking off to shemale porn is normal, as long as the ladyboy is the one doing the fucking

[–]Who-or-Whom 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

You can't have that username and then say jerking it to a video of a shemale taking a dick is weird. It gets way dirtier and far weirder than that.

[–]dirty_porn 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

in good ladyboy porn everyone gets a creampie

[–]Devanismyname 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I just jerk off to whatever. I usually feel really weird after though. Kinda dirty and regretful.

[–]Whatthefuckamisaying 19ポイント20ポイント  (16子コメント)

Dudes with boobs?

[–]Jmersh 53ポイント54ポイント  (12子コメント)

Thugs with juggs.

[–]Borba02 18ポイント19ポイント  (11子コメント)

Mans with cans

[–]HiimCaysE 10ポイント11ポイント  (5子コメント)

Fellas with melons.

[–]LinkUnseen 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

Boys with toys

[–]Helios-Apollo 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Males with tails?

Sorry, I'm new at this.

[–]AverageTheJam 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nah, that can work; I've seen big-assed shemales before.

[–]Jmersh 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

That bloke's a hoax.

[–]serpentofnumbers 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

muffins with stuffins

[–]rarely-sarcastic 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I wish my bros would get boobs.

[–]EmbersGame 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Denises with penises

[–]SpermWhale 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Princess with testes.

[–]maxxfarrell 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sick reference bro, everyone knows your references are out of control

[–]mikerakabit 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What about Caitlyn Jenner?

[–]Strangely_quarky -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow, what a funny and unique joke :^)

[–]dietmoxie -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nah dude

[–]mewantcookie83 34ポイント35ポイント  (42子コメント)

I thought the one in pink was hot at first. Am i gay now?

[–]Dreadedsemi 116ポイント117ポイント  (16子コメント)

I have a bad news for you. Since she looks very much like a female. You are still straight and can't use that as excuse to leave your wife.

[–]browwiw 3ポイント4ポイント  (10子コメント)

I'm OK with myself finding convincing transsexual women attractive, but upset with myself for not finding this one attractive because she's Asian. Being a self-aware, progressive person can be problematic.

[–]Tomiix 20ポイント21ポイント  (3子コメント)

There is nothing wrong with not feeling a sexual attraction to a race. Since humans vary so widely in shape and color, you are bound to have preferences, and if you don't find asian attractive that is fine. The difference is wether or not your a douchebag about it.

[–]GetMeOffReddit 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hell, you can even know that someone is attractive but still not be attracted to them. I mean, man, I can look at a really pretty black girl and know that she's drop dead gorgeous and still not want to have sex with her.

Or, better yet, a guy knows when another guy is good looking. I think. Unless if I'm bisexual and don't realize it yet.

[–]just_some_Fred 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

don't worry about it too much, it only counts if you're racist above the belt

[–]So-Cal-Mountain-Man 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because she is Asian, or because you did not want to be typical and like an Asian Lady?

[–]GetMeOffReddit 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't think it's racist to not be attracted to someone because of their race... Or, if it is, then I think most people are racist since almost everyone has their preference.

[–]TranshumansFTW -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

Most trans people dislike the term transsexual. Transgender or just trans is a better term. However, this isn't a hard and fast rule, so "trans women" is best.

Also, I know what you mean, but "convincing" is kind of not OK as well. Again, I know you don't mean to offend or anything, but "convincing" makes it sound like trans people aren't "real" women or men, and it sets up a system by which only passing trans people are considered "worthy" of equal treatment.

However! Thanks more than all the rest for using the right pronouns! I know it can be confusing for peeps who haven't been exposed to it before, so it's great to see more people these days making the effort. Hope you have a good day!

[–]Lantro 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Interesting. Is there anything less offensive to describe a trans woman who easily passes as a conventionally attractive cis woman (you know, aside from just "an attractive woman")?

[–]epicflyman 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

There is a huge difference between being transsexual and transgender. Neither is mutually inclusive, and it is unwise to assume so.

For someone apparently so dedicated to the Trans members of society, I would think this would be reasonably basic knowledge.

[–]cthulhubert 41ポイント42ポイント  (16子コメント)

This is an interesting question. (I'm working under the assumption that that is, as people have assumed, a "ladyboi".) I think it clarifies somewhat to realize that it's—probably—not honestly a sexuality question (unless your attraction really was based on hidden cues of maleness provoking a latent attraction to other males), but rather an essentially linguistic one, that is, "Is it reasonable for others to call me gay because I am attracted to a male that presents passingly as a woman?"

I think when framed that way, the answer is pretty strongly indicated as "No."

It's a little more complex a consideration if the fact that the attractive woman-passing person has a penis is part of the appeal. But I'd still say "no". Words, including the word "gay", are tools of information exchange. In information theory (as well as common sense), the efficacy of communication is how little surprise you have by an actual situation after it's described to you. If your buddy told you they were gay, and had just scored a super hot date, you'd probably expect somebody that looks like this, not like this.

On the other hand, if this is what turns ones crank, that's something else yet again.

[–]spookyttws 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm straight and very much appreciate the manly man's beauty. Good for him, but really shouldn't be wrangling cattle without a shirt on. He's going to get soooo sunburnt.

[–]GoochKnee2000 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

Thanks. OK, who is #2...

[–]dontnation 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Or this

[–]danzey12 2ポイント3ポイント  (4子コメント)

It's a little more complex a consideration if the fact that the attractive woman-passing person has a penis is part of the appeal. But I'd still say "no".

Homosexuality is defined as, "sexually attracted to people of one's own sex." Sex Differentiation is the process of developing sex differences in Humans, part of this process is the development of basically the testes and ovary, thus if part of the appeal to the "woman-passing" person is the presence of the male reproductive organs then it is accurate to say that person is homosexual, or at least bi-sexual as they are attracted to what can be determined as "their own sex".

Edit: Just to clarify this isn't my actual opinion, I was just continuing with the over-analysis.

[–]cthulhubert 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sure sure. And yet, actually using the word "homosexual" for that person still generates some surprise. That's essentially the argument I'm making: with the exception of technical jargon, definition should follow useful usage. Now it's true, trying to adhere to dictionary definitions can aid in clarity by referring to a common basis for meaning; but there are going to be edge cases (like this) where a handful of words in a book was insufficient to delineate an entire slice of actual existence, and we, as language using humans, should step past the boundaries of the dictionary to use words meaningfully.

[–]danzey12 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Then why not, if we're already deviating from the books, generate an entirely new word to define this phenomenon, the implication of it not being homosexual is that it's a heterosexual act which, by strict definition or otherwise, doesn't aptly describe the occurance.
Simply saying "it's not gay" isn't really using words meaningully, it's more a lack of words and a lack of ability to attribute the case to any current definitions. Maybe we need something new to give a name to the attraction to a person who, on the outside appears to be a woman but has the genetalia of a male and the knowledge thereof being part of the attraction.

[–]kx2w 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Ah, it's the old quantum gay paradox. It all depends on when exactly one perceives an attraction. Does it precede the definitive genital awareness based on mere looks alone, or is it in fact a direct result of it, enhanced by the underlying, less apparent truths? And what if learning the knowledge itself determines the very outcome? To an objective observer, at any given moment it's both.

[–]tnethacker 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not bi, but I'd fuck both of them at the same time. /s

[–]RalfieBear 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You... I like you. ...

[–]TranshumansFTW 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Also, here are a few things to remember:

  1. If you're attracted to a trans woman, you're attracted to a woman. She's not "male passing as female", she's female. You don't "turn gay" just because you're attracted to a woman who happens to be trans. It's totally OK to like trans people!

  2. A lot of trans people who present as female or mostly-female in Thailand do not identify as female. Many identify as phet thi sam, or a variety of other terms, which have no direct translation into English but which would be closest to third gender. They do not identify as either male or female, but as something else and who happen to like presenting as femme.

  3. It's not transphobic to not be attracted to trans people. If you're a straight male who does not like penises, it's totally OK to say you're not attracted to a trans woman who's pre- or non-operative. Transphobia is hating trans people just because they're trans, and treating trans people as different or lesser because of that. In the same way that I'm not attracted to men but that doesn't make me misandrist, you can not be attracted to a trans person and not be transphobic.

  4. A lot of the terms in the modern language used to describe trans people (mostly trans women) are considered pejorative. Ladyboi/y is a pejorative term, and whilst some people in SE Asia are OK with the term people in the west consider it offensive. Additionally, the "S-word" slur for trans women is totally unacceptable, as is the "t-word" slur (you know the one, it ends in "-ny" and I'm not going to say it because it makes me feel sick). Do not use these to describe trans people, OK? Just call trans people the term they identify as, like male, female, neutrois, third gender etc. Just accept that there are more genders than you realise, and that it's not your place to decide what to call others.

[–]Tacsol5 -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

Woah..."not like this" is a dude? I have a thing for pin up girls though. Not fair.

[–]fuzzyperson98 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, AJ Bailey is a pre-op transgender who probably prefers being referred to as a woman in daily life.

[–]LikeGoldAndFaceted 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

No.

[–]StinzorgaKingOfBees 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't have the relevant information to answer that fully and accurately.

[–]Xezlec 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Not only no, but also after knowing her biological gender you're even allowed to continue to think she's hot and/or engage in a relationship with her without being gay. In fact, you can even have occasional sex acts with cis males without identifying as gay. Sexual identity is a wonderfully fuzzy thing!

[–]master_dong 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

or engage in a relationship with her without being gay.

If you're a guy having sex with another biological guy you are not "heterosexual." There isn't anything wrong with it but if someone's tallywacker is dangling between their legs while you bang them in the butt it's a little silly to try to convince yourself you are straight.

[–]Xezlec 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't agree. First of all, a hetero man can definitely be attracted to a feminine-looking trans woman, and act on that attraction while just choosing to overlook that one detail. Second, a post-op trans woman might not even have that detail. Third, a single same-sex experience doesn't make you automatically gay anyway. When someone calls themselves "gay" or "straight", they're referring to their own image of themselves -- which gender they generally think of themselves favoring. You don't have to hand in your straight card just because you get one blow-job from a guy one time or something.

[–]Agent_Classy 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Did you say no homo?

[–]DownvotesAdminPosts 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

yea

[–]opspearhead -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're only gay if you were "born this way".

So, no.

[–]winstrol_cycle 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I was kinda hoping so.

[–]ttboo 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dolls with Balls

[–]Kutchyx 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dickie-doos, they ain't 'sposed to have dicks but they do.

[–]ConfuzedAndDazed 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Heros

[–]ShinyWisenheimer 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Chicks with dicks that put mine to shame

[–]Targaryen-ish 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Chixie Dix

[–]mkul316 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

And cobra whiskey.

[–]underdog_rox -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Best of both worlds!

[–]Rad_Reddit_Rando 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

well, this whole gif is contradictory and they dont look like fun at all

[–]RyGuy_42 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Is that anything like a dubois?

[–]johnbanken 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

They're all furious.

[–]possibLee 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wait, really? With that ass?

[–]e-wrecked -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

doot