34
35

Thousands of Americans died on 9/11. The U.S. Government clearly doesn't mind murdering its own citizens, so can someone tell me why they would use "crisis actors" in a false flag attack? (self.conspiracy)

Ayo_Dotson が 投稿

全 49 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]terrorhawk_ 13ポイント14ポイント  (34子コメント)

So that they say the right things and push the story in the direction that they want it to go.

[–]Putin_loves_cats 15ポイント16ポイント  (30子コメント)

That mother fucker who got his limbs "blown off", then appeared at a Bruins game holding a US flag, a week or so later rings a bell...

[–]LetsHackReality 5ポイント6ポイント  (27子コメント)

Yeah that was pretty bad...

[–]Putin_loves_cats 8ポイント9ポイント  (26子コメント)

Not only bad, but completely illogical and goes against human physiology. If this isn't blatant enough, IDK what would be. Many EMS/rescue workers/doctors admit, this is impossible.

[–]LetsHackReality 8ポイント9ポイント  (4子コメント)

They wheeled him away from the scene, sitting upright, with no legs -- and HE WAS STILL CONSCIOUS!!

No blood pressure? No problem!

[–]Putin_loves_cats 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Exactly, he should've been pissing/shitting himself. Blood would be everywhere, he wouldn't of made it past a few minutes. As said by many EMS/rescue workers/doctors. Shit is a farce. This is the sole reason I question the events of that day. It defies logic and human physiology. Much like almost all these events, seems like science/physics/human physiology took a day off on these days.....

[–]WhiskeyGoSlow 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

The sole reason? The whole immediate aftermath footage is ridiculous, esp given the official injury count.

[–]Kimchidiary -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

Clearly you don't go on WTF enough. There was a chick with no leg conscious and using her phone.

[–]TheRehabKid 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Shhh...they don't like facts around here.

Just bad analysis by bad doctors and snakeoil salesmen.

[–]GrovyOne 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Why is "blown off" in quotes? He definitely doesn't have legs anymore.

[–]TheRehabKid 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

They believe around here that he never had legs to begin with. That he's a crisis actor with prosthetics lol.

[–]thedubckrons4life 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Harley Guy. That is all.

[–]Greg_Roberts_0985 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Full of cringe, for people who have not seen this obvious acting...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5y8PtfKA14

[–]overredditid [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This is funny: "Well uh, um, there's a lot of standing by."

Context: At 2:23 guy in black suit suddenly re-positions the reporter and the reporter then casually asks,

-Sir, can we talk to you for a sec, what's your role right here right now?

-Just standing by right here right now. Can't say what role I'm playing right now.

-Well uh, um, there's a lot of standing by.

And then the reporter brings up concerns about building 7 might actually come down as well.

[–]badcopnodonut2point0 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

No pesky relatives asking questions and demanding investigations.

[–]MurrueLaFlaga 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Here's a humorous take on your question:

None of this is fact, of course. It is simply conjecture; however, I find this woman's videos compelling and relatively funny/entertaining. This one is my favorite of hers (all of her sources are in the description box). Personally, I believe they use the crisis actors to keep the narrative exactly how TPTB want it.

Edit: Someone actually asked the same question (basically) that you, OP, asked in the comments section below [if you scroll down to the top of the comments section here.

[–]transcendReality[🍰] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

This should help put things into perspective for you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5y8PtfKA14&list=PL9On8wg264bzcXf2eKXHsAtr0wuSExKw1

[–]Jordan1invest 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's a single compartmentalized portion of the operation and separate from the actual event. There are theatrical divisions within certain government agencies that "sell the sizzle" so to speak. Similar to dropping leaflets, sound bites via news programming and influence in movie scripts. It's used to sway public opinion and to solidify the agenda, event or needed outcome.

Frosting on a cake.

If I needed you to believe or learn something I would say it, give you visual confirmation and then reenact it so that you were 100% sure to have been well informed.

Some people are visual learners, some can do it via text and others must live it or react on an emotional basis to get it. This is why the theatrical exists. To hammer it home.

[–]OakTable 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

To get people so distracted by the 2-3 crisis actors that they ignore the fact that there was a real bombing that took place?

[–]GrovyOne -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Isn't that what's called a "Red Herring"?

[–]otistoole -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

To save money. The 911 highjackings were relatively cheap to pull off. Also, they only use crisis actors for certain ones, and for certain uses. A lot of times, a lot of real people die. see oklahoma city and terry yeakey.

[–]Rockran -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

How are they saving money by HIRING actors?

[–]Getterxin 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Look at it like a movie production and you see the answer clear as day.

With less actual victims, or no real victims, the less people to pay off or bribe to keep their mouths shut.

Plus the cost is not literal money, but knowledge. If you have no real victims, you have no real motivation by some to seek answers like with the people who were killed on 9/11 who had families that still want answers.

With actors, you do not have to pay out money other than what was already paid out to said actors and the actors will not ask questions but push the agenda you want them to because you own them.

Costs are contained, and your "production" stays on budget.

[–]Rockran 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

With less actual victims, or no real victims, the less people to pay off or bribe to keep their mouths shut.

How the hell did you get to that logic?

Now they need to pay exorbitant amounts for these actors to keep their mouths shut. If any of these crisis actors spoke out, there'd be a shitstorm. Be safer to just blow people up.

you have no real motivation by some to seek answers like with the people who were killed on 9/11 who had families that still want answers.

Because the average working Joe who lost a family member in a terrorist attack is a real threat to government secrets? Yeah right, the real threats to government secrets are those smart enough to get access to them, such as hackers.

With actors, you do not have to pay out money other than what was already paid out to said actors

Why not? You think a crisis actor is going to play victim for a single lump sum? They're going to want a constant stream of income.

the actors will not ask questions but push the agenda you want them to because you own them.

How do they own them? You think the average crisis actor is happy with pretending to be disabled 20 years down the track?

It'd be easier, safer and cheaper to actually blow people up - Than to pay them out for life to live the lie.

[–]Illogical_Blox 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yep. What a lot of conspiracy theorists don't realise is that the more people involved, the less likely it is. Conspiracy involving 10 people? Possible. Conspiracy involving 1000 people? Highly unlikely.

[–]otistoole 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

because it is cheaper than people actually being killed.

[–]cubscout407 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

IMO crisis actors are used in events where a drill must take place in order for the plan to be carried out successfully.

[–]LetsHackReality -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Crisis actors will be wholly unnecessary soon, if not already.

I gotta think our window of opportunity is closing.