•
•

Who wrote the Bible ? (self.Christianity)

Blandblank が 投稿

It is obvious that the bible is the divine creation of God.The bible is far ahead of science.The bible has prophecies that are still true.The events in the bible are historical fact.The enemies of Jesus will try and claim that the word of God was edited by monks.That is a devil's lie.

全 42 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (12子コメント)

It is obvious that the bible is the divine creation of God.

I don't disagree that the Bible is divinely inspired, but the idea it is inerrant and just fell from the sky on a rainy day by the behest of the Lord is ridiculous.

The bible is far ahead of science

The Bible does not claim to answer scientific fact, and in the OT, it gives allegorical interpretation of creation. Almost every major denomination agrees that Genesis is not literal, and that Science and Religion work on different levels.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSVPZykCRyQ

The enemies of Jesus will try and claim that the word of God was edited by monks.

Yes. The Bible has been edited, and translated. Unless you are the only person in the world who has actually managed to find an original manuscript of the gospels, in their original tongue, you can not claim it is not edited.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_translations

The events in the bible are historical fact.

Not all of them. Taking the Bible at face value is probably one of the silliest things someone can do. It is a heavily allegorical compilation of texts which must be read with the guidance of those who have come before you, or your priest. Please look into some of the patristics, especially those by St. Gregory of Nyssa and St. Basil.

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

The bible is scientific fact Genesis mentions anesthesia during surgery 6,000 years before anesthesia was used God is far ahead of science

/u/versebot [psalm 119:60] The bible is meant to be taken literally

Denying the truthfulness of the bible is the silliest things you can do

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

Psalm 119:60 is in relation to obedience to God, not bibliolatry. Genesis does not mention anesthesia.

Denying the truthfulness of the bible is the silliest things you can do

Please take the time to listen to the video I linked, and read the article. Beyond that, look into older biblical commentaries.

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

Genesis does mention anesthesia.Read the bible.God put Adam to sleep while removing his ribs.I meant psalm 119:160

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

So an omnipotent entity can't put people to sleep without anesthesia?

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Anesthesia is needed for surgery.God is far ahead of science

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

Uh. You are seriously taking that literally?

God could turn the entire universe into gelatin. He didn't need anesthesia as he is all-powerful. Of course he is 'ahead of science', he's omnipresent, omnipotent, and omnibenevolent.

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

I believe God tells the truth so yes I take that literally

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

You are really poorly educated, and need to have a conversation with literally any person that isn't someone in your current parish. You are being misled.

[–]Help all humans!VerseBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Psalms 119:60 | English Standard Version (ESV)

[60] I hasten and do not delay to keep your commandments.

Code | /r/VerseBot | Contact Dev | Usage | Changelog | Stats | Set a Default Translation

All texts provided by BibleGateway and Bible Hub.

Mistake? Blandblank can edit or delete this comment.

[–]thomasxian [スコア非表示]  (12子コメント)

Warning. This looks like another account of the hit and run troll we've seen over the last few days

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (11子コメント)

I see your logic.If someone believe the bible they must be a troll

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

No. But you're also acting like a biblical literalist who leapt into a 2000 year old compilation of texts without the barest background and refuses to understand that your interpretation may not be the be-all, end-all.

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

The holy spirit has convinced me that God's word is 100% true.It is impossible for God to lie

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

I agree that it is impossible for God to lie. It possible, however, for men to be deluded.

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

So you deny the truth from God's word

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

No, I deny your cockamammy interpretation.

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

It is not an intepretation.The words of the bible are clear

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

No, they're not. It's a 2,000+ yr old religious text. Do you also read revelations literally, with Christ having seven literal swords jammed into his mouth?

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

So you are saying that the authors of the bible are not prophets of God ?

[–]United Church of Christpalaverofbirds [スコア非表示]  (10子コメント)

Any particular reason you believe monks were incapable of placing edits in the Bible? There are modern English translations that differ quite widely on some points. I see no reason to think that Greek copyists, Latin copyists, could not have made alterations if they felt a particular word or phrase conveyed an idea better.

I agree that the Bible is sacred. It is the Word of God. But it is a word carried on through human beings. I think that is an important point that you kind of seem to suggest isn't the case. One of the simplest indications I see is, if the Bible is God-speaking like the Quran, why would God address Paul's friends in the beginning of the Epistles? If Paul were writing actual letters, then it'd make sense to address his beloved friends. If God alone authors, God giving shout-outs to particular persons seems... it isn't a reasonable conclusion.

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (9子コメント)

No proof monks edited the bible

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

There is written evidence, recounts of these edits, and multiple anecdotes about them. Please look into the Venerable Bede.

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Maybe the 73 book catholic bible was edited by monks(no suprise there) but the Word of God was not

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Uh. The 'Catholic Bible' just adds the Apocrypha. It includes all other texts. The Catholic Bible includes the Word of God. Are you just a troll?

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

the catholic bible was edited.The 66 book bible was not

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

That's not true, at all. What denomination are you, out of curiosity?

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

/u/versebot [psalm 119:160]

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Psalm 119:60 is in relation to obedience to God. The Bible is not a physical manifestation of God, it is a compilation of texts compiled by the faithful to be read with a careful eye and with the guidance of a priest(or simply through the yearly liturgical cycle in church, a'la - Lectionaries), which affirm the faith.

[–]Blandblank[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

psalm 119:160

[–]ChristianSineAnima [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

"160 The sum of thy word is truth; and every one of thy righteous ordinances endures for ever."

No one disagrees on this. However, you are leaping head-first into the bible and taking it fully literally. Nobody disavows the sayings of Christ, beyond that, the psalms are devotionals to be prayed, not sources to spread an agenda, the psalms themselves written prior to Christ.

[–]Help all humans!VerseBot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Psalms 119:160 | English Standard Version (ESV)

[160] The sum of your word is truth, and every one of your righteous rules endures forever.

Code | /r/VerseBot | Contact Dev | Usage | Changelog | Stats | Set a Default Translation

All texts provided by BibleGateway and Bible Hub.

Mistake? Blandblank can edit or delete this comment.