use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
9,961 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
How does reddit work? Click here to find out.
Welcome to /r/AdviceAnimals Sound advice from animals anything!
Rules Follow all Reddit rules. This includes not asking for upvotes and not revealing personal information. We're here to have a laugh. Hate speech, bigotry, and personal attacks are not allowed. Death threats and telling others to kill themselves will result in a ban. Follow the general Advice Animal format: Two line joke over a re-usable character. Don't repost. Report reposts by messaging the mods. No Cake Day Posts. No Verticals, Opinion Puffins or Batman Slaps. 2 Advice animals in a vertical are OK. Link directly to your image. Don't make memes with pics of people that you saw in real life. Ever. Witch-hunts are forbidden. Shortened links, Facebook, Tumblr, Blogspot, etc, will be automatically removed. We reserve the right to remove posts, remove comments, and ban users at our own discretion.
Making Memes Visit: Memegur MakeAMeme MemeGen Wuzu Memedad WeKnowMemes MemeCaptain MemeCreator LiveMeme Diylol DropMeme Memesly Captionday Trollme MiniMemes or try one of these: Imgflip Iomeme Free iPhone App Free Android App 1 Free Android App 2 OS X meme generator Please keep the 'advice' relevant to the character. Not sure? go to knowyourmeme.com. Want AdviceAnimals in your comments? here's how.
Please keep the 'advice' relevant to the character. Not sure? go to knowyourmeme.com.
Want AdviceAnimals in your comments? here's how.
Message the mods We are always happy to help. Please attach a link to the comments of your submission and a description of the question/problem you are having. If you can't see your submission in the new queue, please double check that your new queue is ranked by new and not rising. If you still think it is in the spam filter, don’t delete your submission, message the mods instead. Deleting it will make the spam filter more likely to filter you next time you post. click here to message the moderators
We are always happy to help. Please attach a link to the comments of your submission and a description of the question/problem you are having.
If you can't see your submission in the new queue, please double check that your new queue is ranked by new and not rising.
If you still think it is in the spam filter, don’t delete your submission, message the mods instead. Deleting it will make the spam filter more likely to filter you next time you post.
click here to message the moderators
You may also enjoy: Our Family /r/ADHDMeme /r/AdviceAtheists /r/AdviceHell /r/AnimalsBeingJerks /r/AnnoyedPicard /r/awwducational /r/BatmanSlap /r/ConfessionBear /r/DucksAndBears /r/Kelloggs /r/LibertarianMeme /r/Memes /r/MemesIRL /r/MetalMemes /r/RealAdviceAnimals /r/shittyadviceanimals /r/SlothMemes /r/SpideyMeme /r/TVMemes /r/Vertical /r/MarvelMemes and... /r/gaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyy /r/AdviceAuthoritarians /r/TournamentOfMemes
and...
This logic always annoyed me (imgur.com)
albatross49 が 2時間前 投稿
[–]keedro 111ポイント112ポイント113ポイント 54分前 (11子コメント)
Unless you're driving.
[–]RedxSmoke 32ポイント33ポイント34ポイント 25分前 (9子コメント)
or black
[–]rent-a-cop 37ポイント38ポイント39ポイント 23分前 (8子コメント)
Or white.
[–]Skitspel 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 22分前 (2子コメント)
https://youtu.be/tyBs6-cmFvQ
[–]rent-a-cop 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
I love that song!
[–]Tolmos 644ポイント645ポイント646ポイント 59分前 (281子コメント)
It's an odd concept that I can't really get behind; it basically views women as inferior to men, and unable to retain their senses in the same situations in which men are capable of doing so. It is literally treating women as children, and men as the consenting adult supervisors of those children, responsible for making sure to protect the women not only from themselves but also from those around them.
I can't get behind that. My definition of equality doesn't really jive with that way of thinking.
[–]Jmunnny 116ポイント117ポイント118ポイント 37分前 (43子コメント)
That don't jive, turkey.
[–]houndofbaskerville 64ポイント65ポイント66ポイント 24分前 (17子コメント)
Oh, stewardess! I speak jive.
[–]Jps1023 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 17分前 (4子コメント)
Cut me some slack, jack.
[–]hennelly14 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 11分前 (1子コメント)
Chump don' want no help, chump don' get da help
[–]Uralyah 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 8分前 (0子コメント)
Don't call me mustache, clown.
[–]LOADING_REDDITOR_1 32ポイント33ポイント34ポイント 17分前* (11子コメント)
I can't believe I'm saying this again within a week.
It's "excuse me Stewardess, I speak jive."
Edit for quotation error.
[–]beachexec 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 16分前 (1子コメント)
You must live a hard life. :(
[–]LOADING_REDDITOR_1 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 10分前 (0子コメント)
It's been rough. :/
[–]Let there be plight.acromulent 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 11分前 (1子コメント)
Your quotation mark game needs work.
[–]raceover 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 12分前 (1子コメント)
*It's "Excuse me Stewardess, I speak jive."
[–]G3N3Parmesan 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 12分前 (1子コメント)
Are you sure it isn't, "Excuse me Stewardess, I speak Jive."
[–]N3rdLink 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 23分前 (11子コメント)
Woah woah woah. Who u callin' a jive turkey?!
[–]leredditmaymays 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 19分前 (9子コメント)
He called you a cock sucker I swear!
[–]BigSeth 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 17分前 (7子コメント)
I remember the quote but I can't remember the movie, source?
[–]Dynam1k 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 11分前 (0子コメント)
Semi Pro.
[–]GoddamnitReggieRay 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 10分前 (0子コメント)
It's from Semi Pro.
[–]Champs27 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 10分前 (0子コメント)
The "I speak Jive" is from Airplane. The "Jive Turkey" is from Semi-Pro.
[–]capnuck 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 26分前 (2子コメント)
[–]zissou149 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 14分前 (0子コメント)
Yes I too took an introduction to women's studies class
[–]pHitzy 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 18分前 (0子コメント)
You got to sass it!
[–]Sjcolian27 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 16分前 (0子コメント)
jive-ass turkey!
[–]mrhooch 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 16分前 (0子コメント)
It ain't cool bein a jive turkey so close to Thanksgiving...
[–]darwin2500 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 13分前 (0子コメント)
If you can't understand the logic of this position, it's because it's not an actual a real position that anyone or any group holds. Men and women are both liable for criminal actions while drunk; men and women both are unable to consent to sex while drunk under the law. The fact that men more often get charged for rape when alcohol is involved has everything to do with legal definitions of rape and biases in how likely a man vs a woman is to press charges in such a situation, and how likely people are to take them seriously if they report and go forward to prosecution. No one in the world is actually saying there's a difference in responsibility.
[–]comrade-jim 89ポイント90ポイント91ポイント 30分前* (35子コメント)
My definition of equality doesn't really jive with that way of thinking.
Watch out you're about to get called an ignorant racist sexist misogynist as your accuser sits upon a moral high-horse of self-righteousness while pushing an authoritarian ideology under the guise of "social justice".
In reality the SJW's are just as bigoted as the people they claim to be against. They go around bullying people and making fun of people and think somehow they're the righteous ones.
SJWs are fanatical members of a fad religion, extremists.
SJWs are the saddest group of losers on the internet and by far the most delusional. It's fascinating to watch them contort their ideology and do mental gymnastics to justify their hypocritical bigotry.
It's not about "equality" for them, it's about forcing everyone to obey their authoritarian rules and using powerful words like "racist" and "misogynist" to squelch anyone who might disagree with them and control the narrative of the conversation, after all no one wants to be called racist.
[–]aStarving0rphan 39ポイント40ポイント41ポイント 21分前 (15子コメント)
Actually, if you go to the top posts of /r/feminism and read the comments, a lot of them would agree with you and the guy above
Specifically this post http://www.reddit.com/r/feminism/comments/1t7b8d/_/
[–]SayAllenthing 31ポイント32ポイント33ポイント 19分前 (4子コメント)
Just because SJWs label themselves as feminists, doesn't mean their views represent feminism.
[–]BrilliantDynamitesNe 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 13分前 (1子コメント)
something something loudest ones in the room...
[–]TheMarlBroMan 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 10分前 (1子コメント)
But they get WAY more traction than "real feminists" do whatever that term means nowadays.
We're getting into "No True Scotsman" fallacy territory here.
[–]beachexec 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 14分前 (0子コメント)
/r/feminism isn't so bad. It's /r/feminisms and other SJW affiliates that are bad.
[–]da_pudz 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 14分前 (0子コメント)
I think SJW has developed into a term almost separate from feminism and the other various causes they are associated with. They have become the extremist outliers of good movements. It's sort of like the difference between a Muslim and a Jyhadist, the one is a minor subset of the other but does not determine the entire religion.
[–]szthesquid 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 11分前 (0子コメント)
You can say that, but an alt account of mine was called a rape apologist and banned from that sub for trying to have a discussion about where the line is between "had a sip" and "too drunk to consent".
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 14分前 (0子コメント)
Now if that level of reason was only applied to our totally sexist "justice" system.
Come on feminists, men need equality too. It's hard to fight for fairness when being villified by other feminists though.
[–]khaeen 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
Which is why he stated that SJWs are extremists. SJWs are the ISIS/Westboro Baptists of the feminist cause.
[–]hardcoreufoz 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 13分前 (1子コメント)
10 bucks this is all over SRS within the hour
[–]IllustratesYourShit 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4分前 (0子コメント)
No, they will cherry pick an obvious joke and conveniently forget to discuss the difficult questions. I'm not exaggerating, that is exactly what they do every time.
[–]CireArodum 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 11分前 (0子コメント)
It's funny that you warn him he's going to be attacked for what he posted and then go on to attack people for things that you suspect they will post.
If someone says something shitty call them out on it. Don't poison the well by saying hey people will disagree with you but it's okay because they're all disingenuous. Are you trying to have a real discussion or win at the internet?
[–]stichery87 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 20分前 (1子コメント)
Carefull comrade. The sjw intencity is echoed in your well reasoned responce.
[–]faustless4 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 13分前 (0子コメント)
http://i.imgur.com/zZmygHh.gifv
[–]bendovergramps 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 19分前 (4子コメント)
I'm inclined to think that less than 1% of of 1% of those vying for social justice think this way. I always see comments (and posts) like this, and to me, it's like scraping the very bottom of the barrel and using it to represent the entire barrel. Most of the time, we don't give them any attention.
[–]BrilliantDynamitesNe 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 12分前 (1子コメント)
Laws that are passed seem to reflect otherwise. Like the new one in California that a women cannot consent to sex while intoxicated but men aren't covered in that law.
[–]TheGoldenFruit 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 29分前 (0子コメント)
You could flip it the other way too saying that women have a social advantage to men. I agree with you, it should be changed to accommodate both, just sayin you could flip it like that.
[–]bipolarrealist 47ポイント48ポイント49ポイント 42分前* (80子コメント)
Superficial feminists aren't looking for equality, they're looking for advantages/benefits over men.
[–]quickdrinkthis 85ポイント86ポイント87ポイント 39分前 (58子コメント)
Those are not actual feminists
[–]INGSOCtheGREAT 112ポイント113ポイント114ポイント 37分前* (29子コメント)
No true Scotsman, yadda, yadda.
You find people of any group that can have wacky ideas. That doesn't make them not part of the group.
[–]ImperialPsycho 45ポイント46ポイント47ポイント 28分前 (7子コメント)
Being part of a group and representative of a group are not the same thing, though.
[–]magmasafe 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 17分前 (2子コメント)
They're trying to be representative though and that's the issue. Feminism typically forms a new wave when these things occur and I think a lot of people feel we need 4th wave feminism to get the movement back on track and away from the superficial posturing that's arisen. Otherwise there's a real danger of feminism being discredited by these people and we'll need to build all this momentum up again.
[–]AverageUnknown 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 13分前 (0子コメント)
Perhaps not, but considering the amount of direct harm feminism has done lately (and the number of their members who are complicit or in agreement with it, whether through ignorance or malice), the "not real feminists" argument doesn't hold as much weight with me.
[–]lateralus124 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 20分前 (0子コメント)
Damn Scott's, they ruined Scottland!
[–]Bay1Bri 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 14分前 (1子コメント)
But what if the group is defined by their ideas? If someone says "I'm a feminist but I don't think women should be allowed to vote" would you still consider them a feminist?
[–]beverlycrushher 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 23分前 (2子コメント)
I actually think that fallacy doesn't apply here, as the Scotsman falacy tends to apply to instances where an auxillary behavior does not ostracize a person from a group that conforms on a separate and unrelated reason.
This is the original excert (according to Wikipedia, so take what you will): Imagine Hamish McDonald, a Scotsman, sitting down with his Glasgow Morning Herald and seeing an article about how the "Brighton (England) Sex Maniac Strikes Again". Hamish is shocked and declares that "No Scotsman would do such a thing". The next day he sits down to read his Glasgow Morning Herald again; and, this time, finds an article about an Aberdeen (Scotland) man whose brutal actions make the Brighton sex maniac seem almost gentlemanly. This fact shows that Hamish was wrong in his opinion, but is he going to admit this? Not likely. This time he says: "No true Scotsman would do such a thing".
"Sex maniac-ing" someone and being born in Scotland are unrelated. They did not "sex maniac-ing" because they were from Scotland, and being from Scotland did not make them a sex manic.
In this case, Feminism by definition and most practices, is "the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men."
In this case, wanting women to have advantages more than men directly conflicts with what makes them part of the "feminism" group. So they really aren't feminists and the fallacy doesn't apply.
[–]EggsNbeans 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 29分前 (1子コメント)
No, only the good examples count.
[–]fati_mcgee 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 11分前 (0子コメント)
DOES NOT COMPUTE
[–]Pomguo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 13分前 (0子コメント)
It's equally No True Scotsman to say that feminists are the ones who want superiority to men, btw.
[–]3rdweal 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 33分前 (0子コメント)
They are not true scotsmen either.
[–]bipolarrealist 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 37分前 (4子コメント)
Those are people who use feminism as an excuse.
[–]CalvinDehaze 38ポイント39ポイント40ポイント 36分前 (3子コメント)
Let's call them "Gender Extremists". They do exist on both sides.
[–]Hazzman 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 26分前 (0子コメント)
I just call them twots.
[–]thatgirlwithbigboobs 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 28分前 (0子コメント)
It's called misandry
[–]nyrp 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 27分前 (2子コメント)
I actually would argue that the ones who promote that thinking ARE they real feminists. They are the activists who are getting laws changed: "enthusiastic consent", "don't teach women not to drink, teach men not to rape", and giving women weeks and months to decide whether the sex they had was rape or not. We hear about these social changes because they are the public service announcements, new rules, and new norms that the most powerful segments of this group are able to make a national storm over. Therefore, they ARE the real feminists, they hold feminist power, they are making feminist changes to society.
Even if you claim they are not feminists, they hold the microphone and they say they are feminists. So, to them they are feminists, to the public they are the face of feminism, and responsible for the new social attitudes about women. So, to them, you are just a woman-hater who tells other women who is and who isn't a feminist, when they claim to be one and they've convinced everyone they are such. And they're making feminist new rules, their version anyway, so how could you say they're not feminists. If they're not feminists, what are they?
[–]jeanduluoz 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 25分前 (1子コメント)
No true feminist would do that!
From wiki:
No true Feminist is an informal fallacy, an ad hoc attempt to retain an unreasoned assertion.[1] When faced with a counterexample to a universal claim ("no Feminist would do such a thing"), rather than denying the counterexample or rejecting the original universal claim, this fallacy modifies the subject of the assertion to exclude the specific case or others like it by rhetoric, without reference to any specific objective rule ("no true Feminist would do such a thing")."
[–]PussyWhistle 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 36分前 (4子コメント)
Those are misandrists. They're the ones that make real feminists look bad.
[–]JesterMarcus 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 22分前 (1子コメント)
The problem is, if those people are now the voice and face of your movement, that's not everyone else's fault or job to fix it.
[–]PussyWhistle 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 15分前* (0子コメント)
Yeah, I don't really have a strong opinion on it one way or another. I just think people should know the difference between feminists and radical man-hating psychos.
[–]agha0013 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 34分前 (1子コメント)
There's feminists, and then there's "feminists"
Just like everything else in life, there are people who hide behind certain causes to try and push their own agendas.
There's environmentalists, then there's PETA and Greenpeace...
[–]beachexec 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 6分前 (0子コメント)
I love when feminists commit the "No True Scotsman" fallacy then immediately try to dismiss it it out of hand.
[–]Mortress 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 31分前 (2子コメント)
Feminists want men and women to be treated with equal respect. Seeing women as irrational children to obtain some sort of advantage over men is the opposite of that.
[–]DrKronin 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 27分前 (1子コメント)
Ya, I'm gonna have to see as much discussion about the lack of women in construction jobs as STEM and government before that seems even remotely true to me.
[–]gordonv 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 24分前 (0子コメント)
Agreed. I've decided to identify as an egalitarian. Actual equality.
[–]Cthulu2014 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 29分前 (0子コメント)
Well in situations rife with drinking where inhibitions and social norms are lowered you can almost view it through a cavemen-style lens of "if push comes to shove most men can overpower a woman on a purely physical level to do what they want"
which creates a dicey situation when women and men are both hammered in each other's company, and results in this ostensible double standard of making men 'more responsible' for their actions than women when drunk
Modern society complicates it with additional dynamics, but women are generally the weaker sex and at more risk of being taken advantage of by a man who is drunk than vice versa. Not always, but in general it holds true.
[–]UneasySeabass 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 30分前 (51子コメント)
I don't think you understand drunken consent laws at all. I kind of think you don't want to, but I'll try to explain it anyway.
Having sex with ANYONE too drunk to consent is rape. Guy or girl. You have the legal right to not be raped while you are drunk.
If someone commits a crime while drunk (robbery, rape, assault) while drunk, you can be prosecuted even though you were drunk. If two people are drunk but one of them has sex with someone else to drunk to consent, you can still be prosecuted.
Does that make sense?
[–]I_Am_The_Mole 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 26分前 (8子コメント)
Is it possible for both parties to be "too drunk to consent" or is it a binary "one person was quantifiably more sober than the other and therefore is held responsible"?
[–]PeterGibbons316 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 23分前* (1子コメント)
So if two drunk people have sex they are raping each other?
[–]wiifan55 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 21分前 (6子コメント)
In reality, the law is not applied that way. Also you can't ignore the historical evolution of the law, which for the longest time didn't even recognize male rape by a female as possible because penetration was a required element. The issue comes up when both parties are allegedly too drunk to consent. In this instance, it's the male that still likely gets charged.
[–]UneasySeabass 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 20分前 (5子コメント)
Well you can thank feminists for getting the definition of rape changed so that men can be raped in the eyes of the law.
[–]wiifan55 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 10分前 (2子コメント)
That's not what's being discussed at all, so I have no idea why you felt the need to bring it up. You very clearly have a terrible grasp of the law in this topic. I was providing a historical context as to why prosecution when both parties are unable to consent is still skewed towards one sex. Also, I notice you keep repeating a line about "whoever initiates the sex" in these instances is the rapist. That's entirely incorrect for a number of reasons: (1) practically speaking because initiation can be mutual; and (2) legally speaking because the law just isn't written that way. Essentially, it seems you're just making things up as you go.
[–]shrekter 36ポイント37ポイント38ポイント 26分前 (12子コメント)
You're leaving out the part that only men are prosecuted in the event that both parties are drunk. There was even a poster about it.
[–]CIthrowAway 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 22分前 (4子コメント)
Men are significantly less likely to come forward and admit to being raped. That is one of the reasons why the statistics are so skewed.
[–]DiluvialAscension 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 15分前 (0子コメント)
Or maybe they don't think having sex while drunk and regretting it the next morning is rape.
[–]shrekter 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 18分前 (0子コメント)
One of them.
[–]RedRing86 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 15分前 (0子コメント)
That's because it's not really rape. If someone is drunk and says they want to have sex, and they have sex and they are awake the entire time and do not change their mind. It's consensual.
Drunken laws are stupid. Is it unethical to have sex with someone you barely know who is goofy off their ass drunk? Possibly.
Should it be a crime? Hell no.
[–]cantaloupe5 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 24分前 (3子コメント)
What if both the guy and girl are too drunk to consent but one side claims rape?
[–]zephyrtr 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 23分前 (4子コメント)
If two people are drunk but one of them has sex with someone else to drunk to consent, you can still be prosecuted. Does that make sense?
Is there a situation where both parties are too drunk to consent, but sex still happens?
[–]cain3482 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 18分前 (0子コメント)
Why is it that only one of them has sex with someone else too 'drunk' to consent. Legally they both can't consent as they are both drunk, it wouldn't matter if one was more 'plastered' than the other.
So if both of them are drunk, meaning they can't consent, yet both willingly partake in the event while drunk then who is really raping who? I'm not saying that one is passed out as when you are unconscious you also cannot provide consent (alcohol or no alcohol), I am saying they are both awake, drunk, and providing consent to the other (though that consent cannot legally be given).
Following this through it would be that both of them raped someone.
[–]entwined82 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
I think the problem is that its not just as clear cut as one person having committed a crime. If two drunk people agree to have sex, neither can technically give consent. Based on that, both are sort of rapists and rape victims at the same time. Will both be prosecuted? Probably not.
[–]FarkCookies 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 34分前 (17子コメント)
No sane person endorses this "odd concept", this is total straw man argument.
[–]Youareabadperson6 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント 26分前 (3子コメント)
The policy is endorsed by law and popular culture.
[–]crustalmighty 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント 33分前 (10子コメント)
No true Scotsman is a straw man.
[–]YOU_ARE_A_TOY 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 34分前 (1子コメント)
I wish more people promoted true equality like this. A lot of people are too busy pointing fingers at feminists to realize they can actually become activists of the change we need.
[–]gordonv 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 9分前 (0子コメント)
I think most people look for others who "already understand" rather than try to attack others by building an army.
Instead of talking about people, we should be talking about ideas.
[–]bold_truth -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 30分前 (6子コメント)
What if I told you affirmative action is essentially that same flawed concept?
[–]rj20876 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 16分前 (0子コメント)
You would be wrong. Not arguing for or against it, but it's not close to the same. Since men are more likely to be predators, they are unfairly prejudiced in thus case. Actions of a few are applied to the over all.
In affirmative action, it is set on leveling a playing field in a system that has, in the past actively and passively been designed to supress minorities. This supression has led to real world affects that are still present today and reflected in areas such as socioeconomic status making it harder for a poor inner city black kid, which if you're black you're more likely to be than if you are white, obtain social mobility. Whether you participated in, or agree with it, past views and actions towards minorities have benefitted white people, much in the same way male dominance made it harder for women. Once again, I'm not arguing that affirmative action is a way to correct this, but it's a fact that these past actions have a causal relationship today and affirmative actions goal is to correct that.
Accusing a man of being in control and a woman of not having it is tossing out a deck of cards because a few are marked. Affirmative action is reshuffling a stacked deck.
[–]NonsenseAndVerve 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 22分前 (4子コメント)
I can't really agree with you on that. AA comes from the idea that forces external to the individual make it harder for certain people to find work, not that the individuals themselves are less capable.
[–]aStarving0rphan 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 19分前 (0子コメント)
Actually, if you go to the top posts of /r/feminism and read the comments, a lot of them would agree with you
[–]Sayuu89 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 16分前 (0子コメント)
Sounds like a day in the life of a Mennonite.
[–]sarcasmcannon 65ポイント66ポイント67ポイント 43分前 (4子コメント)
There's an old saying, I can't remember it exactly but it goes something like "Drunk men wake up in jail cells, drunk women wake up in stranger's beds".
[–]OldmanChompski 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 9分前 (3子コメント)
But that doesn't rhyme.
[–]Dfunkhizzle 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 4分前 (0子コメント)
Drunk men wake up jailed, drunk women wake up...nailed?
[–]Drink_Clorox_and_Die 169ポイント170ポイント171ポイント 1時間前 (13子コメント)
Anyone have that pic of "Jon got drunk, Stacey got drunk, they hooked up, Stacey couldn't consent. RAPE." Or however that went? That's what this reminded me of.
[–]King-Dingus 70ポイント71ポイント72ポイント 20分前 (2子コメント)
Here you go :)
http://imgur.com/eGPhwEU
[–]Slut_Nuggets 122ポイント123ポイント124ポイント 46分前 (8子コメント)
I remember during orientation freshman year of college, they told us that NY state law states that if a woman has consumed any amount of alcohol, she is incapable of giving lawful consent and any sexual interaction with her could be considered rape. So that's why I never had sex with any girls
[–]Daman26 46ポイント47ポイント48ポイント 44分前 (6子コメント)
The only reason?
[–]Slut_Nuggets 83ポイント84ポイント85ポイント 43分前 (4子コメント)
THE ONLY REASON
[–]mgr86 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント 33分前 (2子コメント)
WELL?
[–]KaribouLouDied 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 29分前 (1子コメント)
His fuckin face.
[–]KeepEmCrossed 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 19分前 (0子コメント)
That's just his goofin' around face.
[–]PM_Me_Your_PEWPEW 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 30分前 (0子コメント)
https://i.imgur.com/0LV6ygX.jpg
[–]AntManMax1 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント 30分前 (2子コメント)
Most laws state that whoever initiates sex if both parties are drunk is responsible. Which, in most cases, are guys.
That being said, you then run into the issue of it being a he said she said of who initiated sex. Sometimes "yeah I kissed her first so what" is enough to get someone convicted of rape.
[–]woowoo293 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 24分前* (3子コメント)
This is due to the intersection of two legal principles that on their own sound perfectly reasonable, but produce a questionable result in rape cases. The principles are:
A drunk woman (or person) cannot consent to sex. Seems perfectly fine. We don't want creeps taking advantage of intoxicated woman.
People are liable for any criminal acts they perform as a result their from voluntary intoxication, at least for crimes of general intent.
Because rape is typically a crime of general intent, principle 2 applies. Because consent is a defense to a rape allegation, principle 1 applies. That's how we end up in the quandary.
Perhaps a more equitable way to look at it is to understand that the same outcome should apply if a drunk male accuses a drunk female of raping him. This situation is far less common and unfortunately not handled well by society, such as police. But in that case, the woman should absolutely be found guilty of rape.
Edit: changed some wording.
[–]LaterGatorPlayer 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 17分前 (1子コメント)
Well then if a drunk person cannot consent to sex, and a drunk man and a drunk woman has sex; how come they aren't treated the same in the eyes of the law? And especially on college campuses.
[–]TowerOfKarl 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 3分前 (0子コメント)
Yeah. I honestly consider myself a (male) feminist on most issues, but the issue here isn't what feminists think. It's what the law is.
Most states are run by Republicans (and rape is generally a state not a federal legal issue), and although rape law isn't really at the forefront in politics at the moment, I don't think they're so much concerned about feminism as they are about being old fashioned: "Rape is something men do to women, and rape is criminalized to protect women from men (who aren't their husbands)."
[–]biblosaurus 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 29分前 (2子コメント)
Example.
[–]NoFunHere 49ポイント50ポイント51ポイント 59分前 (25子コメント)
According to a post I saw earlier today, drunk men who get fucked are not responsible for their behavior but the drunk man who fucked him was a rapist.
Maybe it has to do more with position than gender.
[–]Mclively 45ポイント46ポイント47ポイント 57分前 (5子コメント)
The one on their back is innocent. Got it.
[–]houssc 39ポイント40ポイント41ポイント 43分前 (4子コメント)
Insist on cowgirl, have her ride you and you're always safe!
[–]SchlitzTheCat 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 37分前 (3子コメント)
Also she can't get pregnant that way because of gravity, right?
[–]GIGA255 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 33分前 (2子コメント)
What does George Clooney have to do with this!?
[–]the_corruption 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 27分前 (0子コメント)
He said she, you dolt. We're talking about Sandra Bullock!
[–]el_zilcho321 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 25分前 (0子コメント)
The sperm will be too busy watching Sandra Bullock floating around to fertilise the and then BAM they're dead.
[–]sidestreet 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 48分前 (4子コメント)
There is a difference between drunk and blackout drunk/unconscious.
[–]Desoge 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 33分前 (3子コメント)
Not according to the law. Many laws are written with the wording that one drink makes it impossible for a woman to give consent.
[–]gerritvb 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 23分前 (1子コメント)
Example of such a law?
[–]TheGoldenFruit 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 22分前 (0子コメント)
Still kinda fucked up. Many people just don't know how the legal definition of rape works, especially if someone is drunk. I've only seen ads when they push the idea that women Arn't responsible for there actions when drunk, when the people who try to make people socially aware should be informing that men can also be in this situation.
[–]clykyclyk 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 20分前 (0子コメント)
May be dumb and not the same... But as a gay guy I agree with the "equal rights. I've been drunk with an ex and not quite remembered it all... I've been drunk at a club and not remembered how long I've been making out with someone, or more... I always understood " if I'm that drunk... It's MY fault "
[–]richardleosimones 53ポイント54ポイント55ポイント 1時間前 (18子コメント)
Well that's because society expects men to be more accountable for their actions than women. That's why for the same crime men get larger sentences.
[–]YouWontBelieveWhoIAm 43ポイント44ポイント45ポイント 29分前 (14子コメント)
That's what's wrong, women should be held to the same standards of accountability.
[–]badsingularity 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 11分前 (0子コメント)
When a woman rapes an underaged boy, it's because they are in love.
[–]Titleist_Drummer 26ポイント27ポイント28ポイント 22分前 (9子コメント)
Believe it or not, feminists aren't the hypocrites many would like to make them out to be, and they're actually in support of equal sentences for men and women.
[–]Lacasax 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 18分前 (0子コメント)
Yes, but they aren't as loud and outdpoken as the crazy ones.
[–]PM_QUIL0N_SPAM 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 19分前 (1子コメント)
Believe it or not, the world doesn't work exactly as reddit believes it to.
[–]Zachariahmandosa 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 11分前 (0子コメント)
Not to be inflammatory, but where is this the case? The only instances I've heard this ever addressed by feminists doesn't call for lesser sentences for men, or longer sentences for women. In fact, I've never heard this issue ever mentioned in feminist conversations; occasionally the "vocal minority" calls for lesser sentencing for women, regardless of the crime.
Again, I'm not trying to be inflammatory, do you have any sources?
[–]FuckOffMightBe2Kind 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 19分前 (1子コメント)
You got it all wrong. There are things that are positive and negative about being a women. Third wave feminism is about getting rid of the negatives and keeping as many positives as possible. Lower wages? Let's protest. Less jail time? Let's get back to the topic.
[–]241410 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 22分前 (0子コメント)
At least we get paid more! /s
[–]copper_chicken 32ポイント33ポイント34ポイント 58分前 (5子コメント)
A staggering level of stupidity. Adults are responsible for their own choices.
[–]shrekter 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 25分前 (4子コメント)
But women aren't adults, don't you see? They're scared little children that need big strong men to protect them from the big scary world.
[–]xTRYPTAMINEx 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 20分前 (2子コメント)
Feminism seems to want to give all of the benefits of responsibility, with none of the actual responsibility. At this point it's just manipulation.
[–]gummz 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 6分前 (0子コメント)
It's not actually feminism anymore. Why does every good thing have to boomerang into its dark version? It's happened all throughout history.
Post-Nazi era tolerance was good, but this 2015 accept-all-the-everything era is going off the other end. If the end result is racism towards white males instead, then what fucking progress have we made?
[–]swareonmemum 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4分前 (0子コメント)
One of the reasons I don't like feminism. Objectively, their philosophy for equal rights is sound. It's just that a large portion of feminists aren't willing to give up the freedoms they have currently
[–]SuperJo 94ポイント95ポイント96ポイント 44分前 (43子コメント)
Feminist here (yeah, I know. Down vote.) I have never heard this logic, and it certainly goes against everything I believe regarding consent. Hell, I've been in more than my fair share of "What the Hell did WE do last night" situations.
[–]dreckmal 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
[–]Lacasax 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
I don't know of its really a feminism thing, but they do teach this at many college orientations.
[–]FuckOffMightBe2Kind 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 16分前 (0子コメント)
Law says rape.
[–]beeeemo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7分前 (0子コメント)
Reddit gives insane weight toward hypothetical situations where women get to screw over men, and then they say it's okay because they're promoting "real equality" in doing so.
[–]RocinanteOfLaMancha 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント 26分前 (11子コメント)
Don't expect young men on the internet to have actually taken the time to understand feminism and to know that there is plenty of bad feminism floating around.
[–]dgbaker93 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 21分前 (1子コメント)
Well when you only hear about the bad crap (because it is the only interesting stuff) you tend to believe the vocal minority is the majority. But it doesn't fail when there are cases like this that go through (and more common than the opposite). So i think it still highlights a problem.
[–]kegor 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 13分前 (1子コメント)
I'm pretty sure a lot of young men know that. It doesn't have anything to do with the OP. And it's not just "bad feminists" that see things this way. There are guys out there that share this obviously flawed view.
[–]KaribouLouDied 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 24分前 (6子コメント)
This is modern feminism. If you don't believe it, then instead of fighting men, fight the women that give feminism a bad name.
[–]SuperJo 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント 19分前 (1子コメント)
I don't fight men. In fact, I think the best way forward for women in the U.S. right now is to push the men's lib agenda. Women can't have the flexibility in lifestyle that we want unless men have the same.
[–]Beneneb 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4分前 (0子コメント)
Actually, this is what redditors think modern feminism is, not what it actually is. You gotta feed that persecution complex somehow.
[–]Pomguo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 9分前 (1子コメント)
Not at all. Believing that this in any way represents modern feminism is just swallowing the bullshit angry anti-feminists on the internet spew. Feminism has become a generic label ("wants women's position in society to come to an equal place with men") that can be misused, same as Christian or Liberal or Conservative or Socialist.
[–]killjoie 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 20分前 (0子コメント)
Tell us more about modern feminism!
[–]badsingularity 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 13分前 (0子コメント)
[–]akornblatt 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 34分前 (2子コメント)
I would say that there is a big difference between a situation where both parties are equally inebriated and one where one party is taking advantage of the other.
[–]l4mbch0ps 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 28分前 (0子コメント)
But the point here is that they are viewed the same in the eyes of the law .
[–]MarkNutt25 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 18分前 (0子コメント)
Yeah, that would make sense. But then again, when has the law ever made sense?
[–]Desecr8or 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
The reality is a lot more complicated. Legally speaking, it is possible for someone (whether male or female) to be convicted of rape if both parties are drunk. However, it's a case-by-case sort of thing and oversimplified crap like this misrepresents the actual complexities of the issues.
[–]xfinchx21 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
What about if they literally can't even?
[–]shrekter 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 24分前 (0子コメント)
Then they're very odd.
[–]CrystaljDesign 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 11分前 (0子コメント)
This happened to a guy I knew. The woman felt guilty about cheating on her boyfriend so she pressed charges even though they were both intoxicated and he was unaware of the boyfriend's existence in the first place.
[–]ktstarchild 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 10分前 (0子コメント)
See, to a certain extent I can agree with this. A woman is responsible for her actions, if you choose to get blackout drunk without a caretaker/friend looking after you then that's just irresponsible and you are putting yourself in a vulnerable position . I'm a woman and I consider myself a feminist but not in the sense I think most people think of when they hear feminism. I think the whole idea of saying men and women are the same is stupid. We are not. Men and women In general have different physical and mental strengths . Should we be treated with fairness? Yea. Should women be allowed to make her own decisions, the right to vote, the right to work? Yes we should. Is it wrong to take advantage of someone when they are intoxicated ? Yes it is. For both sexes.
I think women however are particularly vulnerable when intoxicated because unfortunately a lot of people see a drunk woman and try to take advantage of that situation and due to the nature of women and their physical capabilities they often are the victim (so to speak) in these situations l.
[–]alorian 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 5分前 (0子コメント)
I've thought about this for quite a while. Treat women like children. Women want to be treated like children, and act like children, until it hinders what they want to do. They want to be spoiled children with tons of attention and no supervision.
At least, that's what this kind of behavior teaches us. Whether it's true or not, that's the subtext to this sort of thing.
[–]StormwindHero 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 5分前 (0子コメント)
It's called female privilege. Women are always assumed innocent and the male is always assume guilty. The worst example of this is "rape" allegations. A women how the power destroy people lives with the accusation of rape and man is always guilty until proven innocent.
Same with sexism accusations, they always take the word of a women as gospel.
[–]FarkCookies 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント 36分前 (14子コメント)
Reddit circlejerking over made up picture at its best. I never ever heard anyone saying this in real life even from people who I would call SJWs. Perfect strawman.
PS: If anyone says wait wait, what about that leaflet about drunk sex, read this.
[–]TheGoldenFruit 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 20分前 (3子コメント)
I have actually seen ads like this in my middle school 5 years ago. Not exactly the same but similar, same with highschool. Ads like this exist.
[–]kevincreeperpants 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 49分前 (3子コメント)
ALL HAIL THE GRAND AND POWERFUL PUSSYPASS!
[–]Mclively 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント 1時間前 (24子コメント)
I hate how feminism talks about women like they do no wrong. It's men that are the cause of everything that is bad in this world, point this out and get a shit storm. Hypocrisy is the reason why I can't take today's feminism seriously.
[–]verdantmiles 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント 42分前 (19子コメント)
Modern feminism has become a hate group.
[–]Uncle_Freddy 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 18分前 (2子コメント)
Those aren't real feminists man, don't confuse your run-of-the-mill angsty tumblr user with the actual feminism movement. Basically, the loud, hypocritical, obnoxiousx tumblr-angst female supremacy movement is to the entire feminist movement what the Westboro Baptist Church is to the entire Christian religion. It's definitely inappropriate to properly consider the smaller, more extreme group as a part of the larger whole
[–]TheGoldenFruit 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 25分前* (0子コメント)
"Today's feminism" isn't feminism, anything that goes against or challenges the original movement of feminism(equal right for men and women) is not considered feminism, if you wanted to be correct anyway. If I see someone who has a incorrect view of the movement I'll correct then, same with Men's Rights Activism.
EDIT:let me rephrase that. People have views that do not go along with the ideal "equal rights for men and women", which is the original idea for feminism. Some people today have misconstrued that ideal, to the point where others have misconstrued the movement which is very unfortunate, it's a great movement.
[–]Demosthenes01101 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 16分前 (0子コメント)
Welcome......to the world of an SJW!
[–]Elbie79 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1時間前 (1子コメント)
Indeed, drunk men are not drunk women.
ಠ_ಠ
[–]mijeranga 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 53分前 (0子コメント)
They can be, by the point of view of another drunk.
[–]rj20876 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 26分前 (0子コメント)
Well, everyone knows women lack agency. Duhhh.
[–]aruraljuror 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 20分前 (2子コメント)
This comment section should be filled with civil, well-reasoned exchanges!
[–]noun_exchanger 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 5分前 (0子コメント)
i'll show you some fucking exchanges
[–]darwin2500 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 16分前 (1子コメント)
Everyone is criminally responsible for criminal actions taken while they are drunk, stoned, or in any other way incapacitated. This has always been true of the criminal justice system, because if it weren't, bank robbers would just get plastered before putting their ski masks on.
If you're mad and think that people should be able to consent to sex while drunk/stoned/high/etc, then just say that. If you're mad and think the laws defining rape in many states make it easier for a man to be charged than for a woman to be charged, then say that. If you're not brave enough to make either of those arguments openly, then shut the fuck up and stop posting misleading bullshit.
[–]BrojobBrojob 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 27分前 (2子コメント)
Great, a new meme. I always thought Reddit needed a new way to bash feminism.
[–]StillbornFleshlight -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 34分前 (1子コメント)
http://i.imgur.com/hM3lHcu.gifv
[–]Witherkay 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 16分前 (0子コメント)
I hope there's a video with sound
[–]bananasarehealthy 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 27分前 (0子コメント)
Is the girl in the picture gianna micheals?
[–]ProfessorIsaiah 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 19分前 (0子コメント)
There isn't any logic in that.
[–]RedxSmoke 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 17分前 (1子コメント)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8JMGrIcUdU
[–]youtubefactsbot 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 17分前 (0子コメント)
Best Drunk Girls Compilation 2014 by Fails Attack [5:38] Best compilation of fails with drunk girls FailsAttack in Comedy 910,784 views since Sep 2014
Best Drunk Girls Compilation 2014 by Fails Attack [5:38]
Best compilation of fails with drunk girls
FailsAttack in Comedy
910,784 views since Sep 2014
bot info
π Rendered by PID 11989 on app-56 at 2015-08-06 15:34:20.666630+00:00 running 556e64c country code: JP.
[–]keedro 111ポイント112ポイント113ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]RedxSmoke 32ポイント33ポイント34ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]rent-a-cop 37ポイント38ポイント39ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Skitspel 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]rent-a-cop 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Tolmos 644ポイント645ポイント646ポイント (281子コメント)
[–]Jmunnny 116ポイント117ポイント118ポイント (43子コメント)
[–]houndofbaskerville 64ポイント65ポイント66ポイント (17子コメント)
[–]Jps1023 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]hennelly14 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Uralyah 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]LOADING_REDDITOR_1 32ポイント33ポイント34ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]beachexec 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]LOADING_REDDITOR_1 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Let there be plight.acromulent 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]raceover 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]G3N3Parmesan 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]N3rdLink 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]leredditmaymays 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]BigSeth 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]Dynam1k 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]GoddamnitReggieRay 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Champs27 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]capnuck 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]zissou149 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]pHitzy 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Sjcolian27 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]mrhooch 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]darwin2500 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]comrade-jim 89ポイント90ポイント91ポイント (35子コメント)
[–]aStarving0rphan 39ポイント40ポイント41ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]SayAllenthing 31ポイント32ポイント33ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]BrilliantDynamitesNe 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]TheMarlBroMan 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]beachexec 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]da_pudz 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]szthesquid 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Terminal-Psychosis 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]khaeen 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]hardcoreufoz 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]IllustratesYourShit 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CireArodum 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]stichery87 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]faustless4 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bendovergramps 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]BrilliantDynamitesNe 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]TheGoldenFruit 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bipolarrealist 47ポイント48ポイント49ポイント (80子コメント)
[–]quickdrinkthis 85ポイント86ポイント87ポイント (58子コメント)
[–]INGSOCtheGREAT 112ポイント113ポイント114ポイント (29子コメント)
[–]ImperialPsycho 45ポイント46ポイント47ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]magmasafe 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]AverageUnknown 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]lateralus124 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Bay1Bri 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]beverlycrushher 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]EggsNbeans 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]fati_mcgee 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Pomguo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]3rdweal 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bipolarrealist 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]CalvinDehaze 38ポイント39ポイント40ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Hazzman 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]thatgirlwithbigboobs 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]nyrp 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]jeanduluoz 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]PussyWhistle 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]JesterMarcus 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]PussyWhistle 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]agha0013 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]beachexec 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Mortress 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]DrKronin 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]gordonv 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Cthulu2014 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]UneasySeabass 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (51子コメント)
[–]I_Am_The_Mole 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]PeterGibbons316 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]wiifan55 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]UneasySeabass 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]wiifan55 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]shrekter 36ポイント37ポイント38ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]CIthrowAway 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]DiluvialAscension 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]shrekter 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RedRing86 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]cantaloupe5 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]zephyrtr 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]cain3482 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]entwined82 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]FarkCookies 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (17子コメント)
[–]Youareabadperson6 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]crustalmighty 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]YOU_ARE_A_TOY 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]gordonv 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bold_truth -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]rj20876 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]NonsenseAndVerve 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]aStarving0rphan 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Sayuu89 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sarcasmcannon 65ポイント66ポイント67ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]OldmanChompski 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Dfunkhizzle 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Drink_Clorox_and_Die 169ポイント170ポイント171ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]King-Dingus 70ポイント71ポイント72ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Slut_Nuggets 122ポイント123ポイント124ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Daman26 46ポイント47ポイント48ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Slut_Nuggets 83ポイント84ポイント85ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]mgr86 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]KaribouLouDied 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]KeepEmCrossed 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]PM_Me_Your_PEWPEW 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AntManMax1 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]woowoo293 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]LaterGatorPlayer 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]TowerOfKarl 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]biblosaurus 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]NoFunHere 49ポイント50ポイント51ポイント (25子コメント)
[–]Mclively 45ポイント46ポイント47ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]houssc 39ポイント40ポイント41ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]SchlitzTheCat 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]GIGA255 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]the_corruption 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]el_zilcho321 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sidestreet 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Desoge 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]gerritvb 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]TheGoldenFruit 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]clykyclyk 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]richardleosimones 53ポイント54ポイント55ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]YouWontBelieveWhoIAm 43ポイント44ポイント45ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]badsingularity 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Titleist_Drummer 26ポイント27ポイント28ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]Lacasax 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]PM_QUIL0N_SPAM 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Zachariahmandosa 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]FuckOffMightBe2Kind 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]241410 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]copper_chicken 32ポイント33ポイント34ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]shrekter 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]xTRYPTAMINEx 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]gummz 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]swareonmemum 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SuperJo 94ポイント95ポイント96ポイント (43子コメント)
[–]dreckmal 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Lacasax 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]FuckOffMightBe2Kind 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]beeeemo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RocinanteOfLaMancha 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]dgbaker93 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]kegor 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]KaribouLouDied 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]SuperJo 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Beneneb 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Pomguo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]killjoie 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]badsingularity 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]akornblatt 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]l4mbch0ps 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MarkNutt25 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Desecr8or 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]xfinchx21 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]shrekter 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CrystaljDesign 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ktstarchild 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]alorian 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]StormwindHero 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]FarkCookies 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]TheGoldenFruit 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]kevincreeperpants 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Mclively 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント (24子コメント)
[–]verdantmiles 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]Uncle_Freddy 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]TheGoldenFruit 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Demosthenes01101 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Elbie79 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]mijeranga 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]rj20876 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]aruraljuror 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]noun_exchanger 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]darwin2500 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]BrojobBrojob 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]StillbornFleshlight -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Witherkay 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]bananasarehealthy 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ProfessorIsaiah 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]RedxSmoke 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]youtubefactsbot 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)