1793
1794

Content Policy Update (self.announcements)

spez[A] が 投稿

並べ替え:
Q&A (提案されたアイデア)
ベストトップ新着論争中古い順
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Briggykins -15ポイント-14ポイント  (7子コメント)

Psychologists say it normalises child abuse material, it makes it more acceptable in the mind of the viewer, and lessens the leap required to start viewing 'actual' child abuse. That's why it's banned here in the UK.

[–]SexTraumaDental 13ポイント14ポイント  (3子コメント)

Yeah just like how "rape" porn normalizes rape and violent video games normalize murder.

[–]Kind_Of_Kind -2ポイント-1ポイント  (2子コメント)

They do, but maybe not necessarily to a degree meaningful outside of a study, and probably not for a prolonged period of time. At least from studies I've read over the years.

[–]SexTraumaDental 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yeah, I don't doubt it. My point is that this talk about normalization is dangerous because it makes a bunch of big assumptions and feels like a way to justify thought policing. Video game violence desensitizes me to video game violence, I'm pretty sure if I went into a war zone and saw real people getting shot and blown up, I'd be pretty traumatized. I'm willing to bet that most people who view lolicon would be disgusted at the idea of hurting a real child. No matter how much something fictional may be normalized I think it's a pretty basic component of humanity to not apply the same normalization to real people.

[–]Kind_Of_Kind 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Totally agree, I just have a burr in my ass about people disregarding valid research. Nothing I have seen could possibly serve as a basis for enacting a law, like so many weird laws in the UK.

The argument for them is almost always based on slippery slope arguments and scared old people.

[–]eoliveri 28ポイント29ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, some psychologists say utter crap.

[–]sleepyafrican 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Source?