あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]archon810Android Police [スコア非表示]  (32子コメント)

  1. I don't care if I have to buy the review unit or not (not everyone knows this but most review units are loaners). It's not about that. It's about timing. Those with review units will get weeks, sometimes months to come up with a review. Those without are at the mercy of the invite system to get a unit.

  2. Embargoed pre-briefings, like the one we had for the OnePlus 2. I highly dislike embargoes, but when some get it and some don't (which ultimately is always the case, it's the definition of an embargo), things become unfair. So publications try to stay in the good graces no matter what so they could continue getting first dibs on the embargoes. Case in point for why embargoes are stupid: everyone with the embargo was forced to sit on their asses twiddling thumbs till 8pm, pretty much half an hour after the announcement was done.

  3. We were promised hundreds of priority invites to give away to the community. These were cut off.

[–]JeezJeezJeez[🍰] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Thumbs up for standing up and telling the harsh truth for all of us. Don't waste your time replying to those Oneplus fans though.

[–]winryNexus 5 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

We were promised hundreds of priority invites to give away to the community. These were cut off.

That sounds like a huge conflict of interest to me. Why would you do that? You definitely need to review a popular device like this but getting free stuff from them to give it away? Why?