552
553

/r/MensRights users explode when one user challenges them to provide "corollary examples of events where a woman has killed many men out of pure misandry". (np.reddit.com)

suchsmartveryiqLiterally Hoodoo が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]delta_baryonAccidentally creates drama [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Hmm, OK Knave of Heart, let's debate.

Racism is not just racism, or all racism is equal but some kinds of racism are more equal than others. Why? Because the consequences are far worse when they come from a position of power. Someone might be able to make my life quite unpleasant for a short period of time, by being racist towards me, but is unlikely to be in a position to lose me earnings or opportunities. It's no big deal because the people in power are white, like me.

Your example where you talk about women molesting men is also interesting. It's not a perfect analogy, but you still have to consider positions of power here. Being molested being someone who is physically stronger than you are is far more dangerous than being molested by someone you could conceivably fight off. Both are bad, both need to be discussed, both need to stop, but they aren't equally bad. Wouldn't you agree?

[–]KnaveofHeart [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Okay, it's 10:40 anti-meridian, I haven't slept, and I've only had 2 cups of coffee, let's fucking debate Delta Baryon.

I see your point, and I will go as far as too say that racism from a position of power is more harmful to people individually. I've been through this myself, however, not what you think. I'm white, and I had a black principle, who was a steaming pile of shit racist. I and other white students, would get suspended, detention, and other forms of punishment for the most minor infractions. Running in the halls. Arguing with staff. Etc. While black students would get let off with warnings for more serious offenses, skipping class, jumping people, etc.

However, this stems from a singular cause. Racism. Which bleeds into a positions of power, not just whites, as you say, but every race. It's a venom to our society, and it all comes from the same snake of seething hatred for one race or another.

It's no wonder you view white racism as more powerful, because you tend to see it more often, because it's covered more often. While other races being racist, yes even while in a position of power, and yes, even when not. Isn't. Because of your viewpoint on the subject. It's BECAUSE of this "We need to look at racism in power, while putting other forms of racism on the back burner because they don't matter" view, that we have racism in power positions. We let it simmer. We let it stew. And eventually, it burns and boils over to positions of power BECAUSE we as a society view one side of things as more detrimental, or worth our time fixing, that other, more benign forms of racism, get to position of power.

Racism as a whole, is a venom to our society. One we can't cherry pick one form over another, if we ever want to solve. Every form of racism. Whether it be my ex-principle, or the white employer who doesn't like Asians, or the old man on his porch talking about how much he hates the coon-man. It's all the same poison. Just because the poison effecting the liver is of more detriment now, doesn't mean you ignore the poison in the leg. You have to treat it as a whole, and as equal threat other wise the poison from the leg, will get into the blood stream, and effect the heart, lungs, and kidneys. Ya sa'avy?

[–]ArchangelleTheRapist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

But, if the person being racist toward you is physically threatening you and you perceive that they have the ability to make good on that threat, do they not sit in a position of power in the context of the situation?

[–]mr_egalitarian [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Being molested being someone who is physically stronger than you are is far more dangerous than being molested by someone you could conceivably fight off. Both are bad, both need to be discussed, both need to stop, but they aren't equally bad. Wouldn't you agree?

I don't agree with that at all. That's basically victim blaming. Men who are raped by women are often:

-Shocked

-Trained from birth to never harm a woman

-Afraid that if he fights off his attacker, she will accuse him of assaulting or trying to rape her, and her story will be believed over his.

-Too drunk to resist

To say that it's not as bad for a man to be raped is to imply, "he could have fought her off, so he must have wanted it on some level." That is victim blaming. It's just like saying that if a woman did not try to fight off her rapist, she must have wanted it, so it's not as bad. In fact, many she could have stopped it, meaning it's someone she could "conceivably fight off" as you put it. Does that mean if a woman doesn't try to physically fight off her rapist, it's not as bad?

I see that you're from SRS, which explains your position. SRS style feminism is a large part of the reason that male rape victims are not taken seriously. That's why it's so important to fight against SRS style feminism.