Ok, did you even READ that article you linked?

Or better yet, the article that linked to that specified what was in the videos?

"The trio discusses Planned Parenthood’s work donating fetal tissue to researchers."

Donations. Not sales.

"The Center for Medical Progress, the group that recorded the undercover video, edited it and posted it on the group's Web site, has accused Planned Parenthood of profiting from the sale of fetal organs, although Nucatola is not shown explicitly talking about selling organs."

That should be a pretty open and shut case. At least in this video.

“In some instances, actual costs, such as the cost to transport tissue to leading research centers, are reimbursed, which is standard across the medical field.”

It isn't like you're sending these things FedEx. It's cellular tissue, which has to be preserved.

And that's not even going into it's actual budget. Here's a report from Fox News that says it's received $4.3 billion from the federal government over the last 10 years, or about 430 million a year. About a third of it's budget. The rest seems to come from Medicaid and other state and private sources. It's not like they're trying to make money off of this. They're a non-profit organization. You think they're making anything at 50 to 100 dollars a pop? If you took away the costs of just transport, let alone the other costs of prepping the samples and other expenses, how much would you even be making exactly? Enough to impact a billion dollar budget? At all?

If you want to make a case that they shouldn't be donating fetal tissue at all, or that abortions are wrong in particular so any activities we do with it are wrong, or that the entire concept of Planned Parenthood should be done away with, by all means have at it. But making arguments with evidence that refutes your primary point isn't going to do it.

P.S. I hate you on principle for sending me to a website that has autoplaying audio ads.