全 7 件のコメント

[–]_Rory_T.K. Whitaker's Ghost 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Questions should be directed to the Sticky Threads, not individual posts.

Read the sidebar, Rule IV.

Also, try the search function first in future: https://np.reddit.com/r/badeconomics/comments/2twaoe/is_a_basic_income_badeconomics_no_not_really_but/

[–]CatFortune 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

/u/wumbotarian- If you're not going to delete threads that violate Rule IV, maybe adding a link flair next to violating threads so people don't follow their example would be a help.

[–]Classically_Liberal2Reactionary Shill 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

No but I fail to see how it is superior to an NIT (achieves similar results but costs much less, although contains a bit more work disincentives) or expanded EITC (improves work incentives.)

[–]wackyHair 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It might be easier to divided the money into smaller chunks than with a NIT? (monthly vs yearly, for example)

[–]HealthcareEconomist3Krugman Triggers Me 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

NIT has fewer labor discouragement effects then UBI, less people receiving a benefit == fewer people being discouraged.

The UBI systems that /r/BasicIncome talk about are all /be because of their scale too, the inflationary, discouragement and d-cost effects would be more then sufficient to eviscerate growth.

[–]_Pragmatic_idealistHitler was an Austrian 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I believe that while the idea of basic income is not neccesarily badeconomics, very often advocates in favour of basic income will engage in badeconomics-

[–]alexhoyerhoard plywood now for our ANCAP overlords 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

A negative income tax is probably better policy, but considering what you see on reddit basic income is far from the worst.