全 8 件のコメント

[–]babydocnorman 8ポイント9ポイント  (1子コメント)

A bubble implies a short term market anomaly where asset values are inflated because of irrational exuberance. Market bubbles always pop at some point, bringing values back to normal levels.

Everything you described is a result of rampant, unchecked female hypergamy, which isn’t a short-term condition, a bug if you will, but a FEATURE of the current sexual marketplace.

Bro don’t expect the “pussy bubble” to burst anytime soon. For the foreseeable future, market prices will continue to be higher than in previous generations. We better be in the top echelon of “buyers” if we want to play in this game.

[–]Sawagurumi 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Women do what blue pill men do: projection. Women don't lower their standards for short-term affairs or ONSs. It would be foolish of them to do so, since the point of such things is to collect high-quality sperm (not consciously, at least usually). So they assume that men do the same, and therefore a high SMV man who fucks her sees her as equally high quality, if not higher (because she looks for higher). But that is not the case. Men have quite a different strategy for short-term mating vs long-term mating. They lower their standards for a quick fuck, but have high standards for the prospective mother of their children. Their sperm costs nothing; their parental investment over 20 years is enormously costly. So, it isn't actually simple foolishness for women to think their SMV is higher because Chad fucks them, it is just projection, which men are prone to as well, unless we are conscious of it.

[–]Lashlarue123 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I disagree. Actual value is the same, perceived value is higher. It just takes more negotiation to get to the actual value, hence better game and more effort are needed.

[–]Toucan_Play_At_This 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Idk that this is anything new.

1)Alpha's grabbing a lower SMV woman wehen they need a hole to fuck isn't new, that's static and part of the machine that keeps lower SMV women thinking highly of themselves.

2)I think this too is part of the natural machine within any modern society.

3)this is totally on point, FA is causing fat bitches everywhere to think they have a higher SMV than they do. Personally I don't think they have any SMV but that's me. This will often be supplemented and increases when an alpha uses one as a fuck hole.

4) artificial inflation of female attraction definitely adds to this.

But thanks to the unchecked hypergamy of Western culture, the abandonment of traditional marriage, the encouragement of women to ride the cock carousel, the family courts biased against men; in short, thanks to the removal of constraints on female hypergamy, the price of pussy has risen far beyond its actual value and continues to rise.

While I don't think the price of pussy is really rising as much as the quality has drastically dropped in reference to the societal pool as a whole I agree with some of your points but I think some are a simple product of civilized society.

[–]BuffaloSoljah 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Previous post I saved from quite a while ago in TRP regarding natural selection and Chad going dumpster diving. Wish I could remember the author.

This post will probably have a lot of controversy in here, but it needs to be said. There is no point in fighting against one's natural nature, since there is an exceedingly good reason why nature intended said creature to be that way. Healthy men are attracted to feminine, submissive, beautiful, and young women. We men are horny by nature, for it is intended that we compete to spread out genes far and wide. Healthy young women are attracted to confident, assertive, masculine men. From here I will move into my argument that hypergamy should be tolerated in women. If you are messing with the natural state of evolution, you are messing with the human race itself.

The main reason why humanity and mankind has flourished to become the most powerful species of animal is because of the hypergamous selective nature of women. Women are attracted to strong alpha high testosterone males because these men have a higher chance of survival than their beta counterparts. If women breed with these males, they ensure that their sons will also be alpha males.These sons will go on to dominate and thus progress the human race through the sheer level of intellect and strength brought on by high levels of testosterone. They will have a higher chance of spreading their genes as well as surviving any combat from lesser men. As the "alpha genetics" are spread through the population, more alpha males will be born. More men with the will to dominate and change things will be born, more men who can lead their societies to a better and more prosperous future when competing against other human societies. The human race will continously improve as women pick better genetics in men. Women are sexually competitive for a reason, and it's not for sport, it's ingrained in their genes, the drive to push humanity forward through sexual selection.

If women were to be encouraged to give unconfident, weak, unmotivated, beta men second chances, the evolutionary process of nature will be ruined. they should not coddle these men's weak nature, Women preferring to carry the children of beta men will inadvertently cause a human society to become weaker in general. No more would the power of testosterone and "alpha genetics" be spread among the population, no more would society prosper because of the efforts of motivated and power seeking alpha males. It may be worthy to note here that countries where women are extremely restricted in their sexuality are or were considered third world countries. Look at how India is, due to arranged marriages. Due to a lack of alpha males who take initiative and charge, it did not progress much in the 20th century. I've been to India many many times, and the beggars line the streets in most cities. A ton of money is put into religious reasons, including the building of useless temples and Hindu cults. In fact the politicians there squabbled about what temples should be built and so on. Only recently, due to the the Westernization spreading there, have things improved. Due to a fall in people doing arranged marriages and women being able to select who they wnt to reproduce with, has there been an influx of alpha males being born. Less money is put towards temples and other bullshit things, more money is being used to establish huge businesses and enterprises, things that alpha males are interested in establishing.

People might think that I'm advocating women divorcing men and ruining children's lives in exchange for pursing their hypergamous nature. I am somewhat,to an extent, doing exactly that. Evolution does not look favorably at the sons of beta men, they do not carry the optimum genetics for gaining influential power and directly improving society. They are not born leaders. A human society needs a good number of strong leaders to flourish, and those leaders are born through Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks. The process of a woman fucking an alpha male behind her children's and beta husband's back, and then getting pregnant and tricking said husband that the Alpha male's children are his, is all part of evolutionary process. But my argument does not negate the purpose behind The Red Pill. It is better to be aware of the nature of the women who are in your life than to be blissfully ignorant of them, so that you can understand their subconscious motivations. Thus you can be aware at what is your part in the evolutionary game, or if you choose to play the game or not. It is better to live life with eyes wide open. But it is also of paramount importance that you do not mess with the natural process of evolution, unless you wish to seek Mother Nature's wrath.

[–]dancingforthemirror -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I did some checking, and there is no relation between female waist circumference and male erection length. As far as I can tell, no studies have even been done on such a thing. Many studies have been done comparing a male's waist ratio with his erection length. The link I include is from the International Journal of Impotence Research and details a study done in Iran.

http://www.nature.com/ijir/journal/v19/n3/full/3901532a.html

[–]Funk54daba 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think he just means dudes get better erections when they're having sex with slimmer women. I've done some "checking" of my own and I concur with his statement.