Saying that Germany had superior weaponry and the US had totally inferior weaponry. I was watching a Red Orchestra 2 USA vs. Germany mod video last night. In the comments someone was saying the Springfield rifle was a copy of the Mauser K98 so that means the Springfield was bad. Wouldn't that also make the K98 bad by extension? The Thompson had too high of a ROF and the MP40 was a slower firing weapon so that = better in every way. They conveniently forgot the M2 Grease Gun, pretty much the US MP40. The M1 Carbine was horrible because it didn't have "stopping power" (stopping power doesn't exist). The M1 Garand is inferior compared to the Gewehr 43 (when the M1 is standard issue and the Gewehr 43 is for "elite" troops then that doesn't matter). The Walther P38 and Luger had more rounds in the magazine compared to the M1911 so they were better (.45 ACP back in those days was better than 9mm Luger, nowadays it is just preference). Germany had the STG-44, the US didn't have an assault rifle so Germany wins in that regard. But the US used the M12 Shotgun, I don't think Germany used a shotgun in large quantities. Then he got into the usual Panzer V and Panzer VI is better than puny Sherman. I wonder why the they always forget the M26 Pershing?