use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
9,571 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Other Subs: Related /r/News /r/PoliticalDiscussion /r/WorldPolitics /r/WorldEvents /r/GeoPolitics /r/InternationalPolitics /r/InternationalBusiness /r/Business /r/Economics /r/Environment /r/History /r/WikiLeaks /r/HumanRights /r/NSALeaks /r/doctorswithoutborders /r/Features /r/UpliftingNews /r/globalhealth /r/modded /r/NewsOfTheWeird /r/Insidernews N. America /r/Politics /r/USA /r/USANews /r/Canada /r/Cuba /r/Mexico /r/PuertoRico S. America /r/argentina/ /r/Brazil /r/Chile /r/Colombia /r/vzla Europe /r/Armenia /r/Bosnia /r/Bulgaria /r/Denmark /r/Euromaidan /r/Europe /r/France /r/Germany /r/Greece /r/Ireland /r/Italy /r/TheNetherlands /r/Poland /r/Portugal /r/Romania /r/Russia /r/Scotland /r/Serbia /r/Sweden /r/Switzerland /r/Turkey /r/UnitedKingdom /r/UKPolitics /r/Ukraina /r/ukraine /r/UkrainianConflict Asia /r/Afghanistan /r/India /r/IndiaNews /r/NorthKoreaNews /r/Pakistan /r/Philippines /r/Singapore /r/Turkey Middle East /r/Iran /r/Iraq /r/Israel /r/kurdistan /r/LevantineWar /r/MiddleEastNews /r/MideastPeace /r/Palestine /r/Syria /r/SyrianCivilWar /r/Yemen /r/YemeniCrisis Africa /r/Africa Oceania /r/Australia /r/NewZealand /r/Westpapua
Other Subs:
Related
N. America
S. America
Europe
Asia
Middle East
Africa
Oceania
Display FIFA/Qatar submissions
Filter FIFA / Qatar
Display Iraq/ISIS submissions
Filter Iraq / ISIS
Display Ukraine/Russia submissions
Filter Ukraine / Russia
Display Israel/Palestine submissions
Filter Israel / Palestine
Display all submissions
Filter all dominant topics
See gilded /r/worldnews comments
Message the moderators
Welcome! /r/worldnews is for major news from around the world except US-internal news / US politics
/r/worldnews is for major news from around the world except US-internal news / US politics
Worldnews Rules See the wiki for details on each rule Disallowed submissions US internal news/US politics Editorialized titles Misleading titles Feature stories Editorials, opinion, analysis Non-English articles Raw images, videos or audio clips Petitions, advocacy, surveys All caps titles Blogspam (if stolen content/direct copy) Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr Old news (≥1 week old) articles Disallowed comments Racism Sexism Homophobia Other offensive content Unlabeled NSFW images/videos Memes/GIFs URL shorteners Personal Attacks on other users Continued violation of the submission or commenting rules will result in your being banned from the subreddit without a warning. Please don't ever feed the trolls. Downvote, report and move on. What Moderators Do and Can't Do
See the wiki for details on each rule
Continued violation of the submission or commenting rules will result in your being banned from the subreddit without a warning.
Please don't ever feed the trolls. Downvote, report and move on.
Sticky Posts • A list of all recent stickied posts.
• A list of all recent stickied posts.
Tension builds between Canada, U.S. over TPP deal (theglobeandmail.com)
CarrollQuigley が 2日 前 投稿
[–]tripwire7 233ポイント234ポイント235ポイント 2日 前 (18子コメント)
Trust me, Canada, if you get out of this trade deal somehow, you are the real winners.
[–]banfromallsubreddits 124ポイント125ポイント126ポイント 2日 前 (12子コメント)
American here, most of us want out of this trade deal just as much as you guys, but sadly we're being forced into it by a bunch of fucked-up bureaucrats and corporate interests disguised as politicians.
[–]Pillowsmeller18 35ポイント36ポイント37ポイント 2日 前 (4子コメント)
yeah it should be treason to give up one's country for corporate interest.
[–]bloodklat 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
Treason? No way, that's just freedom!
[–]CP70 35ポイント36ポイント37ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
Freedom™
[–]bobaimee 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 2日 前 (4子コメント)
There's no way our government isn't going to get on board with this. I refuse to get my hopes up because my government consistently disappoints me, so why would this be any different?
[–]meowman9000 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 1日 前 (3子コメント)
Alberta at least recently voted NDP when PC screwed them. So I have higher hopes for Canada than I do the states.
[–]bobaimee 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日 前 (2子コメント)
Nope, still not getting my hopes up. And I'm from the NWT where it's been NDP for as long as I can remember.
[–]loyalone 554ポイント555ポイント556ポイント 2日 前 (164子コメント)
I hope we have and take the option of not being part of this travesty. I can only imagine our courts being flooded with corporate lawsuits filed because they didn't agree with laws enacted by our duly-elected government, simply due to their perceived loss of potential profits.
[–]VROF 212ポイント213ポイント214ポイント 2日 前 (117子コメント)
The Republicans are fighting hard for this but I read where one representative said the calls to his office were 100-1 against. He voted for it.
My representative is from a very conservative district. The people here are very much against it. He will vote for it and still get re-elected
[–]Five_inches_of_taint 241ポイント242ポイント243ポイント 2日 前 (69子コメント)
Isn't Obama also pushing hard for this? I know Reddit likes to hate Republicans, but can't we at least pretend to be objective?
[–]theillien 266ポイント267ポイント268ポイント 2日 前 (16子コメント)
I told Obama, on Twitter, that he is failing us in this topic. I'm pretty sure we're safe now.
[–]sge_fan 69ポイント70ポイント71ポイント 2日 前 (4子コメント)
Thank you. You saved the world. It was close, but we won!
[–]ImPinkSnail 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
You are the hero America needs.
[–]AmusingGirl 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
paragon of justice and everything good int he world
[–]VROF 105ポイント106ポイント107ポイント 2日 前 (39子コメント)
He is. It appears to be the only thing Republicans agree with. I cannot comprehend why Obama wants this so desperately. The people don't want it. Neither side supports it. At least the Democrats in Congress pretend to be against it but a few crossed the aisle to fast track it. Notice the media silence.
[–]yakatuus 48ポイント49ポイント50ポイント 2日 前 (15子コメント)
I think it's because a lot of US industry is intellectual design. Aerospace, pharma, medical tech and other 21st century industry that needs intellectual property right are theoretically protected by this. All the media companies would be benefitted.
[–]VROF 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 2日 前 (13子コメント)
We elect congress to work for what is best for the people. It seems like everyone has forgotten that.
[–]JamesColesPardon 77ポイント78ポイント79ポイント 2日 前 (6子コメント)
We elect Congress largeley on who spends the most money, like everything else.
Don't kid yourself.
[–]MightySasquatch 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Well Yea but that's not how it's supposed to work.
[–]Rules_are_for_fools 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 2日 前 (3子コメント)
I can see how its possible that there would be some benefit to Americans if the rest of the world is forced to toe the line on intellectual property, most of which is produced in the US.
[–]romancity 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
shut up with facts, this is reddit
[–]JamesColesPardon 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Ding ding ding
[–]redherring2 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Why? Because the big corporations want it, that's why.
[–]Ob101010 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 2日 前 (14子コメント)
Its because they literally think the masses are literally retarded.
[–]Nyefan 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前* (5子コメント)
Are they not? It's been over a decade since citizens united, and most people still couldn't tell you what the ruling was or how it's affected our economic and political climate.
[–]misyo 21ポイント22ポイント23ポイント 2日 前 (4子コメント)
Citizens United was decided in 2010
[–]ShadowBannned 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
Oh, that sweet, sweet irony.
[–]misyo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日 前* (0子コメント)
Right? I even smiled to myself while I typed that out
[–]Ketelbinkie 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 2日 前 (38子コメント)
Typical well informed voters who have not the slightest inkling what and who they are voting for.
[–]manachar 37ポイント38ポイント39ポイント 2日 前 (30子コメント)
Eh.
A lot of people thought Obama was a liberal messiah, when he's been fairly consistent about being a moderate conservative with a desire to build on commonalities.
Upshot: most people vote on if they "like" their rep or not. And that "like" factor is influenced more by identity politics than anything else.
[–]Galeharry_ 34ポイント35ポイント36ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
As i understood it, it wont even be your courts. They will have their own courts where they probably have some say over the outcome. Which is more shady than the blackest black. Source
[–]neotropic9 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Well, it would be great if Canada didn't get on board with what promises to be a great travesty of a trade deal. But what I've learned form politics is that hope leads almost inexorably to disappointment. Hope is redundant to the political process, and may be a liability. Progress doesn't come from hope. It comes from steadfastly defending your principles because it's the right thing to do, not because you think you will change the world for the better. Most people who are idealists and set out to change the world on their own will be beaten down by reality so hard that they might just become conservatives.
[–]girlygrill 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Fuck the NAFTA chapter 11. I don't want more of that shit.
[–]serael 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前 (5子コメント)
A top comment in a thread that refers to harpers gov as legitimate, never thought I would see the day. Thank you for that
[+][削除されました] 2日 前 (4子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]InqGeist 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
The funny part is that this slow down is not over that of the tpp , its about poultry and dairy.
[–]WirelessZombie 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
Myth 4: ISDS allows companies to sue for lost profits
This is a very reductive description of what ISDS does, presumably done for simplicities sake to explain a complex mechanism that exists in more than 3400 agreements agreements across the globe, including some 50 that the US is already party to, and has been around since 1959. ISDS doesn't allow a company to sue for 'lost profits'. It only allows companies to sue and win for the violation of any of the four fundamental protections of the investment protection chapter. This will be a simplification, but if I called you a pervert and you lost your job as a result, you wouldn't sue me for 'lost profits'. You'd sue me for defamation/libel, and seek lost profits in damages. Similarly, companies can't sue in ISDS for 'lost profits', they can only sue for the violation of those protections, and can be awarded lost income as a result. I go into considerably more detail on the subject here.
This is from this post
[–]lukeyflukey 953ポイント954ポイント955ポイント 2日 前 (333子コメント)
You know the sad thing about the TPP is? Legally, there isn't a thing you can do about it. Sure you can protest, you can lobby, you can write letters, you can spread the word but ultimately one company with a few million is worth a billion votes.
That's why I won't judge if I hear about a nailbomb being dropped in the lap of a TPP author.
Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent revolution inevitable.
[–][deleted] 366ポイント367ポイント368ポイント 2日 前* (176子コメント)
CEOs of worldfucking corps are sure going to be in for a shock when joe extremist realises they're as explodable as any other corrupt leader. Somehow they've gotten away with everything being "just business" all this time.
edit: commenting on the news; this user brought up something I'd been showerthinking about... nobody should want this to actually happen.
[–]99drumdude 179ポイント180ポイント181ポイント 2日 前 (149子コメント)
I dont understand how something like this hasnt happened yet. Every time something ass-backwards is approved like the TPP i think "damn, some loon is gonna do something horrible to whoevers idea that was"
[–]Manadox 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
Because most people have something to lose.
[–]amnes1ac 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Exactly. Eventually it will reach a tipping point where a large number of people are willing to risk it all because they have so little. And that's when it will happen.
[–]gelinrefira 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Because of the bootstrap propaganda. Convincing Americans that there is still such a thing social mobility and the American Dream for all is the greatest propaganda campaign ever waged.
[–]boredguy12 80ポイント81ポイント82ポイント 2日 前 (114子コメント)
Theyre not loons and neither are we. We're angry!
[–]cmonpplrly 78ポイント79ポイント80ポイント 2日 前 (103子コメント)
The amount of people here seemingly supporting terrorist acts is unsettling
[+][削除されました] 2日 前 (27子コメント)
[–]chowderbags 43ポイント44ポイント45ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
This is not in any way an endorsement, but I fully expect to see a billionaire get guillotined in Times Square within my lifetime.
Sadly I doubt it'll be an actual billionaire. Probably some low to mid level Wall Street trader making 6 figures who may not be as pure as the wind driven snow, but who also doesn't really have any more real power than anyone else on the street.
[–]Fake_William_Shatner 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 2日 前 (3子コメント)
Though Marie Antoinette did not actually say; "let them eat cake" -- I've heard too many billionaires say something that is equivalent.
The bubble they inhabit is more and more shared by the politicos, the pundits and the media. In 2008, we had a 2nd Great Depression, but since the pain was not felt for the .1% -- their media didn't recognize the problem.
[–]Nathan1266 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
She was also like 16 at the time and was being manipulated by her uncle. The present Billionaires will not have that excuse.
[–]lordofthejelly 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前* (1子コメント)
The people do not have jobs that pay a living wage? Well, then let them find other jobs!
I've seen Dave Ramsey say that almost verbatim
[–]Fake_William_Shatner 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日 前 (0子コメント)
I've trained to do almost every job on a computer.
Last time I talked to a recruiter he said; "My resume shows that I lack focus."
There goes the concept of "retraining" to adapt to change.
[–]The_FatGuy_Strangler 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント 2日 前 (6子コメント)
Yea but the billionaires will use the media to pin the general population against itself (like demonization of the poor by people slightly better off). And most people are dumb enough to fall for it, just go on any Facebook of a major local news network (like your local ABC station), most people commenting are fucking morons.
[–]Odditys 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 2日 前 (5子コメント)
but the billionaires will use the media to pin the general population against itself (like demonization of the poor by people slightly better off).
The future tense is necessary. Just look around you... There is an incredible amount of middle- and even lower-class people who think like this guy (for example).
[–]Rinpoche8 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
That guy is truelly a lost cause. He quoted Fox news word by word
[+][削除されました] 2日 前 (1子コメント)
[–]sick__and__tired 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日 前 (0子コメント)
No hope for the future if there are a huge majority of people who think like that. People in power have everyone fighting with each other over ideological nonsense while they take everything from everyone and blame each other for doing it.
[–]gatsby365 40ポイント41ポイント42ポイント 2日 前 (7子コメント)
It is interesting to consider the growth of the printing press in the 17th/18th centuries leading to an era of revolutions as a forerunner to the internet leading to the 21st century being another era of revolutions. If we can launch a Western "Arab Spring", shit will get violent, and then shit will get better.
[–]deadaluspark 34ポイント35ポイント36ポイント 2日 前* (6子コメント)
shit will get violent. , and then shit will get better.
FTFY.
There is abso-fucking-lutely zero guarantee it will get better (Arab Spring is actually a great example of it getting worse.). A power vacuum is a great place for despotism to begin. Beyond this, people with power tend to worm their way back to power, because not everyone else is a fucking sociopath.
Just saying, revolution isn't all sunshine and fucking happiness. You, and many people you love, will likely die in such a situation. Either from violence or from starvation, exposure to the elements, or thirst. Revolution involves destroying current power structures, which in many ways can disrupt food, water, and shelter supplies.
[–]Wanhope 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Better is relative I think, revolution is a fight or die mentality so thr "better" becomes simply:: "not them."
[–]BetterWithSteroids 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
This, sure u might be happy the people in government are gone...but someone has to take their place. Unless you create some sort of intellectual league of fine folk before such revolution, ready to take charge, it will just be a bunch of powerful armed monkeys.
[–]AntiJournalist 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
The belief things will get better is a central tenet of anarchocapitalism, the belief that through the destruction of government, truly free trade could blossom beyond the TPP.
The government should be our instrument to use for protection against corporate tyranny, not enabling it.
[–]gatsby365 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1日 前 (0子コメント)
dear god that's about the best way of explaining it.
[–]boredguy12 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
i'd give power to an AI that learned how to run the country on its own.
[–]gatsby365 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日 前 (0子コメント)
until it decides to drop a city from the sky to wipe us all out, man.
[–]Mantisbog 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I think a large group of independent cells committing acts of mild annoyance would be far more effective than going to the dark side of murder.
E.G. everyday the CEO of monsanto gets hit by a waterballoon filled with dog urine.
[–]boredguy12 435ポイント436ポイント437ポイント 2日 前 (32子コメント)
the TPP is the terrorist act
[–]SlaminYou 119ポイント120ポイント121ポイント 2日 前 (5子コメント)
You have no clue how fucking right you are. Free trade deals always cost the highest wage earners jobs. Why overpay for a service in Canada/US when you can do it through cheaper alternative and ship the results. Mid class jobs are almost all wiped out and this will exponentiate the job loss. Competing with countries that don't have labour laws like our own; for a wage most can't live on is unacceptable. I can't upvote you twice so enjoy the gold.
[–]BirdSkull 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I'm sure he has SOME clue about how fucking right he is
[–]thriron 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
Isn't one goal of the TPP to enact and enforce labour laws in those countries?
[–]bluewolf37 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
They already started when the dimwits in office allowed H-1B visas to be used they way they are. Disney fired a entire division of white collar jobs and replaced them with cheap labor and they aren't the only one. If this passes every big business will get cheap labor and tank the economy.
[–]Bert-Goldberg 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
The discussion regarding the TPP has now reached moronic levels
[–]2rio2 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 1日 前 (0子コメント)
What, a bunch of keyboard warriors threatening to murder the writers of a multinational trade agreement on reddit doesn't strike you as a savy plan?
[–]somethingsomethingBS 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
It oddly places corporations above the sovereignty of States (i.e., countries). Parties privy to TPP are beholden first to other TPP parties and must hold TPP's allegiance above those defined in any other document. Why such peculiar language...?
[–]reallyGUYScomeON 75ポイント76ポイント77ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
you wouldn't have liked 1776
[–]gemini86 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I've never actually thought about it that way.
[–]Gylth 24ポイント25ポイント26ポイント 2日 前 (5子コメント)
To be fair all violent revolutionaries could be considered terrorists. The rich have shit on us time and time again. They have started the class warfare using their weapons, money and power, so I wouldn't regret if someone used the only other weapons available that seem to make any impact. I don't condone any violent action, but at this point I wouldn't be surprised if some happened and I definitely wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
[–]CHAINMAILLEKID 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
I don't think that would necessarily be terrorism. I mean, a terrorists goal is to affect as many people as possible. Directly through violence, or rumors, through media, whatever. A terrorist attack is an attack for the sake of impact.
If somebody were to do something horrible in order to send the message that they disapprove of the TPP, that would be a terror act.
Thats why war and assassinations aren't always acts of terror.
[–]Rinpoche8 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
How many people do you think will get affected by this? I would say this is an excellent example of terrorism. Albeit the explosion is slow and not as fast with a bom
[–]thr_sockpuppet_1 48ポイント49ポイント50ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
TPP is also unsettling.
[–]Akesgeroth 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Democracy, rights, protesting, petitions, writing letters to your representatives and all these other methods you can think of exist for the sole purpose of allowing people to avoid violence. If they get ignored by the government, one has to be a fool not to expect violence sooner or later.
[–]UrethraX 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
"The amount of people in here willing to let an evil person die for the good of millions is disturbing"
[–]tablesix 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
More unsettling is the number of people who are readily promoting terrorism from an account which is most likely traceable to them quite easily. Welcome to the list.
[–]99drumdude 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (8子コメント)
Go and shootem up or something. Take one for the team here, bud
[–]Murgie 28ポイント29ポイント30ポイント 2日 前 (7子コメント)
I dont understand how something like this hasnt happened yet.
Ah, allow me to explain:
Taken as a whole, in the specific context of political involvement, the American populace is both comfortable and lazy as fuck.
They can't even bring themselves to see to it that the people in there own government responsible for the systematic abduction and torturing of people are held in any way accountable for it. If they can't get their collective act together over something as unquestionably black and white as that, what chance do you think they have of sitting down, examining the implications of a trade agreement they're not allowed to see, and taking action for or against it as a group?
[–]invitroveritas8 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 2日 前 (6子コメント)
You think Americans haven't (more often) resorted to violence and terrorism just because we are too "comfortable and lazy? Really?
[–]MrTurkle 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Welcome to reddit!
[–]MilkManEX 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
The "comfortable" part is the important bit. We're not so bad off yet that destabilizing ourselves seems worth it.
[–]snackwater 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 2日 前 (7子コメント)
The potential loons are identified and isolated way before they can do anything. There are people that pay attention to this stuff.
[–]TripleSkeet 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (6子コメント)
Um...have you seen the news lately?
[–]gatsby365 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前 (5子コメント)
dude, this is america. they'll basically let you kill all the poor brown people you want; hell, wear a badge and you can actually make a shitload of money doing it.
but don't you think about touching a rich white person.
[–]dwarfHamPlanet 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (4子コメント)
hell, wear a badge and you can actually make a shitload of money doing it.
Love 'em or hate 'em, fact is cops get paid shit.
[–]itsthematrixdood 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
It really varies. In NYC they start at like 35k-45k. In many NJ towns it's not uncommon for police to make 6 figures with OT. I don't know what the national median is though.
[–]jzuspiece 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Depends on the location and the role. A tenured cop that got promoted can make more in 10 years than the average citizen in mid-level, non-executive management (80-120K).
[–]shillsgonnashill 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
But they still get paid, regardless of killing innocents, or killing a k9 partner.
[–]SHIT-NOBODY-SAYS 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
For the same reason you don't do it
[–]brakk53 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
"damn, some loon is gonna do something horrible to whoevers idea that was"
Those that do shit like that are usually only interested in the crazy planet they live on
[–]sickofallofyou 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bread_and_circuses
[–]sabbathrules 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Which is why populists are the biggest demagogues of them all.
[–]SerCiddy 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
YOU HAVE FAILED THIS CITY.
[–]Iam_TheHegemon 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
arrow drawing sound
[–]BigTimStrange 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
CEOs of worldfucking corps are sure going to be in for a shock when joe extremist realises they're as explodable as any other corrupt leader.
They know. they've been planning their escape when shit hits the fan for years. Hidden airstrips in rural farmland, fortified private islands, the whole nine.
[–]Akesgeroth 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
The fact that people are no longer shy about discussing it publicly and that this sort of discourse receives praise should be a wake-up call for people in positions of power to change their ways. They likely won't, and it's likely too late either way.
[–]TeaDrinkingRedditor 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Same with TTIP in Europe. It's purely pro-corporations and anti-citizen. If it wasn't, we'd be able to read it and vote on it.
[–]LurkerSurprise 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
You're fucking delusional, I have actually done some work on the topic of TPP and talked with someone who is actually part of negotiations. Things are terrible and horrifying when you don't understand the complicated details or the interest of other countries involved.
[–]UncleMeat 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
Legally, there isn't a thing you can do about it.
That's true of literally all legislation. If its popular in the legislature then your only options are lobbying and voting. Nothing special about a trade deal.
[–][deleted] 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
It's not a trade deal.
[–]Padatr 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント 2日 前 (29子コメント)
To play devil's advocate a bit, isn't that what everyone who loses a major political setback feels?
People should be persuaded about the effects of any legislation/treaty, and if enough people are persuaded then either the politicians will change their stances or the politicians will change.
And if enough people cannot be persuaded about a certain issue one feels strongly about, well sadly there's nothing about democracy that promises everything will be nice and lovely. Guess the work needs to continue to further spread the information to the people.
The people as a whole get the government they deserve in a democracy.
[–]Trollashnikov 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント 2日 前 (3子コメント)
they just passed the opposed bill c 51, i know almost noone that agreed with it, yet all the liberal and conservative mps voted for it.
[–]Akesgeroth 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Question is, do we still have a democracy?
[–]lukeyflukey 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
Well torture is illegal, immoral and widely condemned by even the President yet it still goes on. As I say, it wasn't impossible to change I'd feel less inclined to hope for a nailbombing of those liars.
[–][deleted] 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント 2日 前* (20子コメント)
Since huge amounts of money and effort are spent on keeping people divided and their opinions controlled as both voters and consumers, this is pure bullshit.
Even if voters managed to unite enough to repair the game, the parasites will merely change tactics... which they can do much faster than the system can react to (between bureaucracy and terms of office) even if people were allowed to be educated (constantly undermined) or have access to reliable information (shills and propaganda fuck SNR) or means of organisation (systematically infiltrated).
[–]ImInterested 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 2日 前 (14子コメント)
Even if voters managed to unite enough to repair the game
The2014 Election had 36.3% of people vote. If people simply voted things would change.
[–][deleted] 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 2日 前* (4子コメント)
Australia has compulsory voting, yet the US, UK, Canada and Australia are all suffering from the same hypercapitalist authoritarian creep, which kinda proves it's an anglosphere thing and/or the same language-bound actors/influences behind it all.
Ultimately the economy is an environment in which competitive economic entities are allowed to evolve, and one of the things an organism can do in order to improve its net fitness is to alter its environment. Lack of regulation and greed have allowed our culture and political systems to be thusly altered.
If voting had the power it's supposed to then it'd be fucking illegal at this point.
[–]entotheenth 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Gotta love how its all discussed behind closed doors to the extent that the shadow ministry is excluded from the details. Thats ridiculous, how can that be to anyones benefit bar the actual draftee's.
[–]Eyekonz 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (3子コメント)
So everyone else's fault, except the citizens, huh?
[–][deleted] 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
Yes.
Don't make the mistake of thinking the playing field is level. At this point we're a couple generations into a (poorly) engineered society created almost whole cloth by early industrialists.
Controlling people is a science perfected by marketers, even if you discount the government's (matter of public record) long-term interest in literal mind control (note that only the failures have been declassified).
How many more decades of corruption, poverty, dangerous contaminants/disruptive hormones in your air/furniture/clothing/food/water, environmental destruction, war crimes and incessant political scandals will it take to convince you that the system is stacked against the people? Hm? How is any of this your fault exactly and why can't you do anything to change it?
[–]GaiusSherlockCaesar 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
Amen, the more I read and hear about TPP the more I'm convinced that in time, it can cause a very big, bloody revolution, which actually might be good for humanity in the long run
[–]fredmratz 117ポイント118ポイント119ポイント 2日 前 (33子コメント)
If only the government officials actually knew what they were bargaining. US officials are only allowed to review it a secret room, making no notes. Clearly an industry written agreement designed to trick governments into signing away the power of citizens to corporations.
[–]ManBMitt 59ポイント60ポイント61ポイント 2日 前* (30子コメント)
Once it's finalized the deal will be able to be read by the public for two months before the final vote.
[–]oboedude 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 2日 前 (27子コメント)
Source?
[–]ImInterested 33ポイント34ポイント35ポイント 2日 前 (22子コメント)
A good post that clears up some myths about TPP
The minimum 60 day period is for US, other countries have different time periods before their legislators vote up/down.
[–]janethefish 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 1日 前 (3子コメント)
I like how it completely neglects to cite anything against the myths.
[–]kerosion 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (13子コメント)
This one strikes me as an incomplete document. The actual details regarding the TPP being made available for 60 day review before an up or down vote is from a section of the 2015 fast-track agreement for the TPP. The particular section pertains to obligations the President has to Congress before the up or down vote. This section does not explicitly state that the public must be granted access to the document as well, nor details to the process under which the text must be made available. There is nothing stating that it wouldn't be made available under intense security, barring political staffers, electronic devices, or notes on the matter.
The particular PoliticalDiscusion link is interesting in the questions it raises but it leaves a large amount of information to be desired on how they are reaching conclusions about these 'dispelled myths'. I was left unsatisfied after taking the time to work through the source material directly.
It would be foolhearty to not remain active and wary given the lack of explicit language stating the full text to be made public.
[–]kerosion 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
This comes from the Fast Track agreement which was passed a month ago or so. I recommend taking 20 minutes and skimming through it. There are only a couple locations that explicitly discuss the text being made available 60 days before the final up or down vote.
The sections that do address this describe the obligations the President has to representatives making the final up or down vote. It does not explicitly state the public will be let anywhere near the text of the thing.
My understanding from those who are better versed than I is that historically fast-track agreements have been made available to the public to read as well, however I have not fact-checked this point. I believe this is where claims that it will be made available to read are coming from, however the lack of explicit language has me not so sure. This would be a good next step item to check on.
The 2015 fast-track agreement for the TPP may be read here. Interestingly, note the language that also grants fast-track for the TIP and TISA in it as well. This was a bit of a 'THE FUCK??' moment for me.
TPA-2015 (fast track) may be used to consider potential agreements resulting from several ongoing negotiations, including The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a regional FTA the United States is negotiating with 11 partner countries in the Asia-Pacific. The Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP) being negotiated with the European Union (EU). A Trade in Services Agreement (TISA), a plurilateral trade negotiation to seek expanded commitments in services trade. An Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA), a plurilateral agreement being negotiated at the World Trade Organization (WTO) to reduce or eliminate tariff and nontariff barriers on goods to promote the environment.
TPA-2015 (fast track) may be used to consider potential agreements resulting from several ongoing negotiations, including
The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a regional FTA the United States is negotiating with 11 partner countries in the Asia-Pacific.
The Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (T-TIP) being negotiated with the European Union (EU).
A Trade in Services Agreement (TISA), a plurilateral trade negotiation to seek expanded commitments in services trade.
An Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA), a plurilateral agreement being negotiated at the World Trade Organization (WTO) to reduce or eliminate tariff and nontariff barriers on goods to promote the environment.
[–]herpberp 43ポイント44ポイント45ポイント 2日 前 (32子コメント)
there is just no way that Canada won't be included in the deal. What we're seeing is yet another Walkback by the Harper government. Mark my words.
[–]69Bandit 40ポイント41ポイント42ポイント 2日 前 (30子コメント)
Hes trying to stall till he can get voted in again, then he will sink canada into 3rd world status.
[–]harpyson11 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 2日 前 (10子コメント)
then he will sink canada into 3rd world status.
Can't we talk about this without hyperbolic language? These kinds of ridiculous statements do nothing to further the discussion.
[–]69Bandit 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (5子コメント)
discussion seems to be overwhelmingly in favor of canada getting the fuck out of the TPP.
[–]Mi11ionaireman 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
From what i understand, it wouldn't benefit Canada all that much. We're really protective of our goods and to lower our standards would do more harm than good.
[–]iamlogris 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Plus the last time we signed on to a big trade deal with the USA, they stole a lot of money from us.
[–]Smoovemammajamma 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (3子コメント)
lol if everything can be purchased elsewhere for cheaper, then it really will become a third-world economy (resource-extraction). don't you wonder where the manufacturing jobs went?
[–]iamthecaptaincrunch 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前* (1子コメント)
Our manufacturing jobs went to China and Mexico because the price of our unskilled labour is not competitive on the global market. This was exacerbated by the high dollar we had due to high oil prices. The same thing happened to American manufacturing. What is your point?
[–]NotObviousOblivious 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
only partially correct. To cheap labour you can add: low environmental standards, low safety standards, no welfare or healthcare, no pensions, etc. There are many costs that must be internalized by companies who manufacture in Western countries to maintain our standard of living. Other countries forgoe these. It is a race to the bottom and Western countries are losing. we will continue to lose until we scarifice these things which underpin our societies, or until we refuse to trade with those who do not have similar standards as us. I prefer the latter but I feel we're heading towards the former.
[–]iamlogris 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
That's not what a third-world economy is/means, and you should be ashamed for furthering that rhetoric.
[–]Konker101 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント 2日 前 (15子コメント)
i just cant wait until the boomers are gone (sorry grandma).
[–]yaypal 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (9子コメント)
I'll have you know my gran votes Green! ...which is just about as useless. At least her heart is in the right place.
[–]Gaulbat 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (3子コメント)
fuck grandma. i want all of these old xenophobic quacks to die so we can start fixing our idiotic world.
[–]herpberp 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
yeah, he's trying to make it seem like he's doing what's best for citizens, but it's just a show for election time.
[–]PastaArt 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I wonder if there are other industries angles that can be attacked by saying "you're not going to get your fair share", or "if the deal goes through, your competition from the other country is going to put you out of business". Basically, if we can pit companies against each other or against the governments and the TPP, perhaps we can sink this thing. The old adage "divide and conquer" would become "divide and and stay free".
[–]Afa1234 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I still don't really even know what that is.
[–]ycnz 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント 2日 前 (4子コメント)
Uh, are the US dropping their subsidies of agriculture in exchange? Since it seems like that'd be a pretty big news item.
[–]BSEXSS 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
My hypothesis is that it's in response to the new USDA guidelines revisions that are coming out later this year. The USDA will most likely be altering them to include less protein and dairy than we are accustomed to in our diet. Numerous studies support this claim for our health. Reduction in cardiovascular disease, etc. I would like to think a shift away from subsidies in meat and dairy could be in response to that...but in reality, it's probably just a money issue.
[–]ycnz 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Most of it seems to come down to the US farming populace being disproportionately represented in government, combined with some pretty epic lobbying by the big "farmers" (can't really call multi-billion dollar corporations farmers).
[–]AnalISIS 83ポイント84ポイント85ポイント 2日 前 (32子コメント)
Canada is equally frustrated with Obama's foot dragging on Keystone.
[–]lasyke3 59ポイント60ポイント61ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
Reddit hates keystone, so nobody cares here.
[–]CJKay93 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
Implying Reddit likes the TPP..?
[–]HugeRally 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 1日 前 (0子コメント)
I think what he means is:
Reddit hates keystone but it's being delayed, therefore there's no cause for outrage. Reddit hates TPP but it's being fast tracked, hence OUTRAGE.
Reddit hates keystone but it's being delayed, therefore there's no cause for outrage.
Reddit hates TPP but it's being fast tracked, hence OUTRAGE.
[–]garlicroastedpotato 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント 2日 前 (27子コメント)
And now it seems that opportunity is lost (for America). Canada's Premiers have met and have agreed to creating a pipeline from Alberta to Ontario/New Brunswick. The oil will now be refined in Canada instead of Texas and those refineries will no longer be purchasing crude.
It also means that we won't be needing the crude oil that was coming from North Dakota via rail. Obama's on his last term so he doesn't actually have to listen to voters. However whoever replaces with him will have to maintain better diplomatic relations with Canada
[–]VROF 38ポイント39ポイント40ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
KXL is bad for America. We are allowing a private corporation to use eminent domain and steal private property from citizens. Who are advised to pay for their own insurance against spills.
[–]desertdungarees 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 2日 前 (11子コメント)
The US, I believe, is okay with that. You can go and ravage your own environment with your own tar sands crude. I'm pretty sure we'll be alright.
[–]Facticity 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前* (1子コメント)
Oil is oil. What makes ours so much dirtier? The mining? Yeah the strip mining at Fort Mac is destructive, but that doesnt exactly get exported on a pipeline.
I don't support KXL because I believe we should be refining our own oil, creating more jobs and keeping profits in Canada instead of exporting them to Texas for a quicker buck. But the environmental argument is pretty weak (and this is coming from a self-described environmentalist) because pipelines are by far the safest means of petroleum transport. Road and rail transport (how it gets to Texas now) has an appalling record and spills occur every day. Pipelines are intensely monitored and built to incredibly high standards. It's similar to public opinion on nuclear power being marred by a couple huge disasters when overall it's actually one of the safest and least polluting sources there is.
Domestically we're now having issues with Northern Gateway from Alberta to Kitimat BC on the west coast. The issue isn't the pipeline itself, its the tankers that carry the oil from Kitimat to the world and their terrible safety record combined with the fucking gnarly coastline in that area.
[–]malaysian-man 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
The issue with that argument is that the value added component of the oil industry is by far the largest in the extraction process, the value added in refining is minimal, and the amount of construction and infrastructure required to build the capacity is very costly. The result is that building upgraders in canada at the cost of tens of billions of dollars puts jobs at risk limiting the profitability of the oil sands. The oil sands are profitable in a very narrow range of oil prices. First of all they sell for 5-10$ less per barrel then the standard commonly quoted on media, and they cost in the range of 60-75$ to extract. I'm all for Canadian jobs, but forcing an industry to produce billion dollar upgraders, rather then utilize ones working undercapacity is foolhardy and illogical. With the latest downturn thousands in Fort McMurray have been laid off as a result of oil falling below its profit margin, it makes no sense to increase that margin to produce some sort term construction jobs and a few long term .
Sources available if this doesn't get buried
[–]Daldidek 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
KXL was bad for both of us, I'm glad we get to keep it because the alternative industries are pretty much being shat upon.
[–]aryst0krat 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (8子コメント)
Seriously? That's actually hella awesome. I've always thought we should be refining our own product. Should help with gas prices, I'd imagine.
Hopefully they can pull it off safely and respectfully, though.
[–]malaysian-man 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (5子コメント)
Refining in the oil sector is not the same in other industries such as forestry. In forestry, the extraction of natural ressources is eAsy, and it is the artisan who turns the lumber into furniture that gets the value added bonus. This is a false comparison to oil. Oil it is the extraction of the resource that garners the greatest chuck of the value added profits, the amount for refining is substantially smaller. Therefore building Canadian refining capacity at the cost of extraction is a lost cause.
[–]amoderate 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Actually two months before debate and suggested changes and a few months for debate before a final vote, so the deal will likely be publicly available for more than 90 days before a vote is cast, but oh well this doesn't fit the narrative.
[–]ChriskiV 62ポイント63ポイント64ポイント 2日 前 (4子コメント)
God when did Twitch Plays Pokemon become so controversial....
[–]mrt90 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
Have you seen how worked up people get over Twitch Plays Pokemon? I'm pretty sure there are places where you'd get stabbed if you tried promoting the Dome Fossil.
[–]ExcerptMusic 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
Hail Helix
[–]daveruiz 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I will maintain anarchy!
[–]paulfromatlanta 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
have repeatedly publicly prodded Canada to produce a “meaningful offer” and disclose to the U.S. what kind of agriculture concessions it will make.
One of the many reasons the process should be more open - so the public in each country can judge for themselves.
[–]pixelrebel 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
“That was very clear; that was agreed upon,” a source familiar with the trade talks said.
Unnamed sources? Not identifying which country the source is from? This agreement has red flags everywhere you look.
[–]aram855 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント 2日 前* (9子コメント)
Every country that is planning to sign this piece of shit should side with Canada. NOBODY WANTS THIS. I'm not even from the States, but I will get affected by this anyway. And almost no one in my country even knows about this piece of crap, being bothered only by a lobby-scandal. This is much worse!
EDIT: Reading a little bit more, my country was one of the founders of TPP. And almost no one inside knows.
[–]farticustheelder 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
May it grind to a halt until we know what it entails.
[–]boredgenius 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
It's a bad deal, so my only hope is that Canada's holdout makes it harder to pass in the U.S.
[–]MaxSwagger 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
Well I am definitely surprised if Harper and his cronies are not asking how high to jump. All they seem to do is suck up to what ever the US tells them to. My only guess is they were paid enough to stall.
[–]laxlife5 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Election is coming and conservatives don't have the poll numbers, have to try to get votes somehow
[–]parko4 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I really hope Mulclair gets elected.
[–]callipygian1 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
hooray for canada. you're a free country, you don't need to be our bitch. reject this bad deal!
[–]Shorvok 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前 (5子コメント)
Is there some sort of organized movement to stop this? There has to be something we can do about it. There's not a single non-corporate US citizen that wants this crap.
[–]igottashare 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント 2日 前 (4子コメント)
Vote Sanders.
[–]arealbigboss 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
This is great news, maybe it will bring more media attention to this fucked up deal.
[–]darkage_raven 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント 2日 前 (16子コメント)
Can we stop exporting unrefined oil, as well as close down those pipes if this stops. I would love for Canada to refine oil so our prices can drop.
[–]kyleclements 40ポイント41ポイント42ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
so our prices can drop
HA! Good one...
[–]DrHoppenheimer 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2日 前 (2子コメント)
Once you include the cost of those new refineries, it's not going to make gas cheaper.
[–]QuantumInteger 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 2日 前 (11子コメント)
Canada doesn't have the refineries. Very few countries do. Venezuela sends its oil to Texas to be refined before being sold on the market.
[–]BloodyIron 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Is this... the New World Order?
[–]wazzel2u 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
This is so much awesomeness. Business lobbyists are stunned that they are unable to purchase the outcome that they demand.
[–]rindindin 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
This is Canada's time to shine.
Time to stay the fuck out of that "deal".
[–]KingofNordicAliens 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I am pretty sure that this tension is between our governments and wealthy elite. Also hopefully we will have someone come into office that will shut that down.
[–]looklistencreate 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Well, whatever happens with this, Canada's still a party to NAFTA.
[–]pogiface 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Surprised this isn't banned yet, didn't we get t memo that all talk about this is banned, praise Pao
[–]I_love_HowardStern 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
Why would the Conservative government in Canada have a problem with the TPP?
[–]Karrionhardt 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Great question! The Conservatives are very antsy about opening up the poultry and dairy markets because those farmers have a huge presence in eastern Canada and a lot of them have been very clear they're not thrilled with the TPP.
They have an election coming up very soon, and it's looking close enough that they realize they need every vote they can get. More Canadians are pissed about it than rooting for it, and that's why they're being so careful. They likely wouldn't give a shit if they had a clearer chance of winning the election, or if it was further off. But you'll notice they very specifically mention being pissed because details ended up in newspapers - putting the Conservatives between a rock and a hard place.
[–]tge90 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I get it, Its like star wars episode 1 how the emperor Palpatine (obama)wanted to force Queen Amidala(Canada) to sign a treaty. Makes since, soon america will invade Canada then once moooore will the Empire rule the Galaxy....then they will be peace.
[–]faployst 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Good. Lets back out of the deal I'm tired of losing my sovereignty to the USA.
Fun fact, Canada mines oil, ships it to Texas where it is refined, then buys it back as petroleum. We have the second largest oil reserve yet we import 100% of our oil. Makes zero sense.
[–]LeyfLeyf 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 1日 前 (2子コメント)
If you haven't actively been opposing TPP, then you your rights to complain about it are not there.
Im 20 years old, and ive called 6 political figures so far in opposition to TPP. It's NOT HARD! There are websites that will actually dial phone numbers for you.
TPP is the beginning of the end of the USA, if you ask me.
[–]sugarfreeeyecandy 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント 2日 前 (9子コメント)
Personally, I hope Canada drops out. OTOH, Canadians I know (farmers, coincidentally) are mad that the US has not approved the Keystone pipeline.
[–]a-wicked-dougie 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 2日 前 (3子コメント)
[citation needed]
[–]ImInterested 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (1子コメント)
Why are Canadian farmers made about Keystone?
[–]DMann420 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
“Our focus is not so much the timelines as it is the quality of the outcome for Canadians.”
As it should be. I'd much rather Canada get booted out of this shady bullshit partnership than compromise itself for the sake of putting more money into the wallets of American farmers, no offense to them.. But the small time farmers have been hurt enough by big Canadian corporations.
[–]69Bandit 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 2日 前 (3子コメント)
God damn, we have already given america the Marijuana market (let them legalize before canada, hold off for long periods to allow them to establish dominance) and now we have to give up our healthcare and allow copyright bullshit from massive american companies to come in and sue our government should we use generic drugs (rather than 200$/pill brand name shit). Ever download TV shows? Our mediatax allowed us to download material and not be charged should we not financially profit from it. That will be gone in favor of "get sued by american companies/3 strikes no internet ever", Dairy/Poultry tariff gets removed and we start eating/drinking the "This shit is illegal in Europe because of the hormones/drugs" products from america and probably about another dozen horrible fucking things that are unknown to the population at this time. This gets passed, i can promise there will be repercussions.
[–]PulsarPirate 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I canuck believe it!
[–]Phyllis_Tine 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Come on, Canada. Hang in there!
[–]dagoon79 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Canada, keep up the pressure.
[–]GaugeFOREVER 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
Canada, the people of the U.S. don't want this, from either party, it's our shit government. The people love you!
[–]iamthecaptaincrunch 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2日 前* (0子コメント)
Good, I hope we as Canadians will collectively tell these corrupt assholes to take a hike.
Hopefully we can make the TPP a big enough election issue that it has the Conservatives running scared in fear of losing to the NDP.
[–]beall49 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 2日 前 (0子コメント)
I have no tension towards my Northern brothers. I heart them.
π Rendered by PID 2083 on app-355 at 2015-07-21 16:17:16.947318+00:00 running 6464919 country code: JP.
[–]tripwire7 233ポイント234ポイント235ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]banfromallsubreddits 124ポイント125ポイント126ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]Pillowsmeller18 35ポイント36ポイント37ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]bloodklat 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]CP70 35ポイント36ポイント37ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]bobaimee 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]meowman9000 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]bobaimee 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]loyalone 554ポイント555ポイント556ポイント (164子コメント)
[–]VROF 212ポイント213ポイント214ポイント (117子コメント)
[–]Five_inches_of_taint 241ポイント242ポイント243ポイント (69子コメント)
[–]theillien 266ポイント267ポイント268ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]sge_fan 69ポイント70ポイント71ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]ImPinkSnail 23ポイント24ポイント25ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]AmusingGirl 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]VROF 105ポイント106ポイント107ポイント (39子コメント)
[–]yakatuus 48ポイント49ポイント50ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]VROF 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]JamesColesPardon 77ポイント78ポイント79ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]MightySasquatch 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Rules_are_for_fools 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]romancity 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]JamesColesPardon 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]redherring2 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Ob101010 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]Nyefan 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]misyo 21ポイント22ポイント23ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]ShadowBannned 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]misyo 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Ketelbinkie 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (38子コメント)
[–]manachar 37ポイント38ポイント39ポイント (30子コメント)
[–]Galeharry_ 34ポイント35ポイント36ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]neotropic9 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]girlygrill 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]serael 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (5子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (4子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]InqGeist 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]WirelessZombie 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]lukeyflukey 953ポイント954ポイント955ポイント (333子コメント)
[–][deleted] 366ポイント367ポイント368ポイント (176子コメント)
[–]99drumdude 179ポイント180ポイント181ポイント (149子コメント)
[–]Manadox 27ポイント28ポイント29ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]amnes1ac 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]gelinrefira 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]boredguy12 80ポイント81ポイント82ポイント (114子コメント)
[–]cmonpplrly 78ポイント79ポイント80ポイント (103子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (27子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]chowderbags 43ポイント44ポイント45ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Fake_William_Shatner 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Nathan1266 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]lordofthejelly 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Fake_William_Shatner 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]The_FatGuy_Strangler 25ポイント26ポイント27ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Odditys 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Rinpoche8 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (0子コメント)
[+][削除されました] (1子コメント)
[deleted]
[–]sick__and__tired 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]gatsby365 40ポイント41ポイント42ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]deadaluspark 34ポイント35ポイント36ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]Wanhope 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]BetterWithSteroids 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AntiJournalist 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]gatsby365 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]boredguy12 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]gatsby365 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Mantisbog 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]boredguy12 435ポイント436ポイント437ポイント (32子コメント)
[–]SlaminYou 119ポイント120ポイント121ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]BirdSkull 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]thriron 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]bluewolf37 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Bert-Goldberg 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]2rio2 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]somethingsomethingBS 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]reallyGUYScomeON 75ポイント76ポイント77ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]gemini86 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Gylth 24ポイント25ポイント26ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]CHAINMAILLEKID 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Rinpoche8 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]thr_sockpuppet_1 48ポイント49ポイント50ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Akesgeroth 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]UrethraX 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]tablesix 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]99drumdude 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Murgie 28ポイント29ポイント30ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]invitroveritas8 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]MrTurkle 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MilkManEX 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]snackwater 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (7子コメント)
[–]TripleSkeet 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (6子コメント)
[–]gatsby365 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]dwarfHamPlanet 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]itsthematrixdood 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]jzuspiece 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]shillsgonnashill 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SHIT-NOBODY-SAYS 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]brakk53 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]sickofallofyou 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]sabbathrules 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]SerCiddy 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Iam_TheHegemon 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]BigTimStrange 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Akesgeroth 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]TeaDrinkingRedditor 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]LurkerSurprise 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]UncleMeat 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (2子コメント)
[–][deleted] 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Padatr 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント (29子コメント)
[–]Trollashnikov 11ポイント12ポイント13ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Akesgeroth 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]lukeyflukey 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント (1子コメント)
[–][deleted] 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント (20子コメント)
[–]ImInterested 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (14子コメント)
[–][deleted] 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]entotheenth 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Eyekonz 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (3子コメント)
[–][deleted] 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]GaiusSherlockCaesar 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]fredmratz 117ポイント118ポイント119ポイント (33子コメント)
[–]ManBMitt 59ポイント60ポイント61ポイント (30子コメント)
[–]oboedude 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (27子コメント)
[–]ImInterested 33ポイント34ポイント35ポイント (22子コメント)
[–]janethefish 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]kerosion 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]kerosion 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]herpberp 43ポイント44ポイント45ポイント (32子コメント)
[–]69Bandit 40ポイント41ポイント42ポイント (30子コメント)
[–]harpyson11 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (10子コメント)
[–]69Bandit 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Mi11ionaireman 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]iamlogris 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Smoovemammajamma 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]iamthecaptaincrunch 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]NotObviousOblivious 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]iamlogris 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Konker101 15ポイント16ポイント17ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]yaypal 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]Gaulbat 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]herpberp 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]PastaArt 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Afa1234 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ycnz 22ポイント23ポイント24ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]BSEXSS 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]ycnz 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]AnalISIS 83ポイント84ポイント85ポイント (32子コメント)
[–]lasyke3 59ポイント60ポイント61ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]CJKay93 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]HugeRally 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]garlicroastedpotato 20ポイント21ポイント22ポイント (27子コメント)
[–]VROF 38ポイント39ポイント40ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]desertdungarees 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]Facticity 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]malaysian-man 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Daldidek 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]aryst0krat 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]malaysian-man 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]amoderate 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ChriskiV 62ポイント63ポイント64ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]mrt90 13ポイント14ポイント15ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]ExcerptMusic 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]daveruiz 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]paulfromatlanta 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]pixelrebel 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]aram855 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]farticustheelder 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]boredgenius 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]MaxSwagger 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]laxlife5 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]parko4 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]callipygian1 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Shorvok 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]igottashare 10ポイント11ポイント12ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]arealbigboss 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]darkage_raven 12ポイント13ポイント14ポイント (16子コメント)
[–]kyleclements 40ポイント41ポイント42ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]DrHoppenheimer 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]QuantumInteger 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]BloodyIron 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]wazzel2u 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]rindindin 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]KingofNordicAliens 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]looklistencreate 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]pogiface 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]I_love_HowardStern 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Karrionhardt 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]tge90 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]faployst 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]LeyfLeyf 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]sugarfreeeyecandy 7ポイント8ポイント9ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]a-wicked-dougie 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]ImInterested 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]DMann420 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]69Bandit 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]PulsarPirate 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Phyllis_Tine 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]dagoon79 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]GaugeFOREVER 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]iamthecaptaincrunch 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]beall49 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)